13
Summary of FY 2016 State Employee Compensation & Benefits Report Joint Legislative CEC Committee David Fulkerson, Interim Administrator Division of Human Resources

Summary of FY 2016 State Employee Compensation … of FY 2016 State Employee Compensation & Benefits Report Joint Legislative CEC Committee David Fulkerson, Interim Administrator Division

  • Upload
    buitu

  • View
    219

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Summary of FY 2016 State Employee Compensation & Benefits Report

Joint Legislative CEC Committee

David Fulkerson, Interim Administrator

Division of Human Resources

1

Base Pay & Salary Survey Analysis

Classified Employee Salary Information

Total Compensation

Classified Workforce Demographics

Retirement Forecasts

DHR Recommendation

Appendices

2

7 Comparator States – 56 Jobs Matched

State Number of Incumbents Weighted Average Salary

Oregon 5621 $51,610

Colorado 17836 $51,557

Washington 8079 $50,870

Wyoming 1561 $43,310

Montana 2190 $41,674

Utah 3413 $40,335

New Mexico 2767 $38,484

Idaho 2624 $36,877

7 State Survey Comparison

In 2014, Idaho ranked seventh in the seven state government comparator market consisting of

Colorado, Montana, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming based on our

salary survey comparisons.

Total Market Analysis

DHR’s analysis of salary survey results indicate classified employees’ salaries for 224

jobs are, on average, 19.8% below the market and the policy rates are, on average,

9.5% below the market.

3

Year

Number of

Classified

Employees

Average Pay

Rate

Average

Policy Pay

Rate Compa-Ratio

Average Years

of Service

2009 13127 $19.23 $22.87 84.1% 10.8

2010 12697 $19.08 $22.87 83.4% 11.0

2011 12604 $18.98 $22.92 82.8% 11.0

2012 12588 $19.47 $22.96 84.8% 10.9

2013 12657 $19.56 $23.03 85.0% 10.8

2014 12888 $19.86 $23.37 85.0% 10.4

Fiscal Year

Number of

Classified New

Hires

Average Pay Rate

at Time of Hire

Average Policy

Rate

Compa-ratio at

Time of Hire

FY 2009 1375 $15.44 $19.48 79.3%

FY 2010 1093 $15.33 $20.10 76.2%

FY 2011 1355 $14.94 $19.84 75.3%

FY 2012 1622 $15.47 $20.27 76.3%

FY 2013 1580 $15.65 $20.23 77.3%

FY 2014 2061 $15.30 $20.04 76.3%

classified employees’ average wage and compa-ratio for the past six years

compa-ratio for classified new hires for the past six fiscal years

The chart below reflects the value of a classified employee’s

total compensation package based on the average hourly wage

of $19.86 as of October 2014:

4

$19.86

$5.07

$3.58

$2.25

$1.52

$0.13

$0.18 $0.03

$12.77

October 2014 Total Compensation Average Classified State Employee

Wage

Medical

Time-Off

Retirement

Social Security

Life Insurance

Workers Comp

Unemployment

Benefits Wage

5

6

Within Idaho’s salary structure, 74% of Idaho’s employees are within pay grades H through M and they earn

between $29,972 and $56,846 annually.

7

Pay Grade

Number of

Employees

% of Total

Workforce

Average Hourly

Pay Rate

Average Years of

Service

H 1785 12.3% $14.41 9.1

I 2246 15.4% $15.72 8.3

J 1664 11.4% $18.35 11.0

K 1612 11.1% $20.37 10.8

L 2029 13.9% $23.40 10.7

M 1425 9.8% $27.33 12.6

Grand Total 10761 73.9% $19.59 10.2

Number of Classified Employees 12888

Number of Non-classified Employees 1683

Total Workforce - Classified and Non-classified 14571

8

Effective Date

Number of Employees

Eligible to Retire - Cumulative

% of Total Active State

PERSI Members

Number of Employees Eligible to

Retire Each Year

% of Total Active State PERSI

Members

January 1, 2015 970 6.7% 970 6.7%

July 1, 2015 1082 7.4% 112 0.8%

July 1, 2016 1447 9.9% 365 2.5%

July 1, 2017 1804 12.4% 357 2.4%

July 1, 2018 2206 15.1% 402 2.8%

July 1, 2019 2626 18.0% 420 2.9%

Total Active State PERSI Members 14581

Retirements comprised 22.9% of the total turnover for employees leaving state

employment. The average age of retirement for the past five years was 61 years.

9

DHR recommends the current salary structure is maintained.

DHR recommends continuing with the job classifications that are currently on pay line exceptions.

DHR recommends that if adequate funding is available, a 3% increase based on merit be considered.

DHR recommends that the State fund the estimated employer increase in the cost of group insurance benefits.

10

Appendix A – Agencies with Classified and Non-Classified Employees

Appendix B – Synopsis of State CEC Increases

Appendix E – Salary Survey Wage Analysis 2014

Appendix F – FY 2015 Salary Structure

Appendix P – Market Related Changes to Address Specific Occupational Inequities

Included

in

previous

years

Appendix G – Classified Employees’ Compa-Ratio by Agency, Pay Grade, and

Salary Range

Appendix K – Total Separations/ Turnover of Classified Employees FY 2014

Enhanced

from

previous

years

Appendix C – NCASG Member Directory

Appendix D – Comparator States Matched Jobs

Appendix H – Classified Employees by Agency and Pay Grade 2009 to 2014

Appendix I – Classified New Hires by Agency and Pay Grade FY 2009 to FY 2014

Appendix J – Classified New Hires by Occupational Group FY 2014

Appendix L – Workforce Demographics by Agency

Appendix M – Workforce Demographics by County

Appendix N – Workforce Demographics by Pay Grade Reflecting 74% of

Employees

Appendix O – Workforce Demographics by Gender and Generation

New

this

year

11

The Hay Group Methodology is based on three factors , each of which have sub factors. Its starts

from the premise that all jobs exist to achieve a purpose - to create value in their organization

and the methodology evaluates this by analyzing and scoring the three factors:

(1) KNOW-HOW - what the job requirements are that person has to meet in order to deliver

the value. Know how has three dimensions: Practical/ Technical knowledge; Planning;

Organizing and Integrating (managerial) knowledge; and Communicating and

Influencing skills

(2) PROBLEM SOLVING - how it is created – the use of know how to identify, delineate

and resolve problems. Problem Solving measures in two dimensions: Analyzing the

thinking environment and analyzing the thinking challenge.

(3) ACCOUNTABILITY - what is the value that is created. Measures the type and level of

value a job can add by analyzing three dimensions: Freedom to act, Scope, and Impact.

David Fulkerson, Interim Administrator (208) 854-3076

[email protected]

12