View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Summary of Recent Results on Rare Decays of B Mesons from
BaBar
for the BaBar Collaboration
Lake Louise Winter Institute
Chateau Lake Louise
20-26 February 2011
Bruce A. SchummSanta Cruz Institute for Particle Physics
University of California, Santa Cruz
Searching for New Physics via Effective Flavor-Changing Neutral Currents
LLWI 2011: Rare Decays at BaBar 2Bruce SchummBaBar
Outline
Recent (past year) results are in three areas:
B K l+ l- with Missing EnergyB K (limit)B K + - (limit)
B (limit)
b (s,d) Penguins CP Violation in Penguin Decays (measurement) B→Xd and the Status of |Vtd/Vts| (measurement)
LLWI 2011: Rare Decays at BaBar 3Bruce SchummBaBar
The BaBar Dataset
54 fb-1
426 fb-1
BaBar collected 468 M BB pairs between 2000-2007 and 54 fb-1 off-resonance data
LLWI 2011: Rare Decays at BaBar 4Bruce SchummBaBar
Flavor-Changing Neutral Currents and New Physics
B+ K+ The Basic Story:
• FCNC process in SM require loops suppressed rates
• New physics can enter at same order
• Modification of BF (x10 or greater!)
• Large CP-violating effects
But always a battle against backgrounds…
For example:
Standard Model
Contribution from Extended Higgs
Sector
LLWI 2011: Rare Decays at BaBar 5Bruce SchummBaBar
B K,K Approach
Mitigate backgrounds bytagging recoil B meson
TaggingB Meson
B K
Tag with reconstructedexclusive SL decay; 1%
B K
Tag with fully reconstructedHadronic decay; 0.2%
SignalB Meson
K Selection: Cut-Based
K Boosted Decision Tree
• Missing energy• Whole-event properties• Signal kinematics• Reconstruction quality
K Selection: Multivariate Algorithm (Boosted Decision
Tree)
LLWI 2011: Rare Decays at BaBar 6Bruce SchummBaBar
B K,K Results
K Result:
Phys. Rev D82, 112002 (2010)
SM Expectation 4x10-6
W. Altmannshofer et al., JHEP 04, 022 (2009)G. Buchalla et al., PRD63, 014015 (2000)
K Result (Preliminary):
SM Expectation 2x10-7
J.L. Hewett, Phys. Rev. D53, 4964 (1996)
(But New Physics effects coupling to m2
f could approach measured limit)Momentum Transfer to +- System
Comparison of results, B+ K+
CL)%90(103.1)( 5 KBB
CL)%90(106.5)( 500 KBB
PRELIMINARYCL)%90(103.3)( 300 KBB
SM Expectation
LLWI 2011: Rare Decays at BaBar 7Bruce SchummBaBar
B
SM Expectation (Bosch & Buchalla, JHEP 0208:054, 2002)
Form B candidates from photon pairs after likelihood-based 0 rejection
B(B) = (1.7 1.1(stat.) 0.2(syst.)) x 10-7 (1.9 significance)
B(B) < 3.2 x 10-7 (90% CL)
arXiv:1010.2229; to appear in Phys. Rev. D
84.66.1 10)1.3()(
BB
LLWI 2011: Rare Decays at BaBar 8Bruce SchummBaBar
Radiative Penguins I: ACP in b (s,d)
TaggingB Meson
610CPAX
High EnergyPhoton
Inclusive Radiative Penguin Reconstruction
• Reconstruct single high-energy photon 2.1 < E*
< 2.8 GeV
• Reduce backgrounds by requiring lepton on tagging side
• Charge of lepton tags flavor on signal side
Standard model expectation:
Any signal would be an unambiguous signature of new physics.
PRELIMINARY
(Lepton fromSL decay)
)()(
)()(
XBXB
XBXBACP
syst.) stat.(063.0057.0
LLWI 2011: Rare Decays at BaBar 9Bruce SchummBaBar
Motivation and Interpretation
• (bs) leading indirect constraint on new physics (SUSY, extended Higgs, extra dimension…)
• (bd)/(bs) 0.03 Precise measurements of (bd) even more constraining?
Practicalities:
• Rate depends on hadronic effects Normalize to Vts by measuring corresponding s-quark process
• Rate depends on poorly constrained CKM parameter Vtd Play off against B mixing, which also measures Vtd sensitively
Compare effective values of |Vtd/Vts| from B mixing and radiative penguins decays (different diagrams!); discrepancy implies new physics
Vt(s,d)
Radiative Penguins II: b d (“Xd”) and Vtd/Vts
Vts(d)
Vts(d)
(d)(d)
(d)
(d)
LLWI 2011: Rare Decays at BaBar 10Bruce SchummBaBar
Radiative Penguins II: b d (“Xd”) and Vtd/Vts
Initial approach:
Reconstruct B (,) and B K* ;|Vtd/Vts| from [B(,)]/[BK*]
More current (“Xd” Analysis) :
Reconstruct “semi-inclusively” via sum of seven exclusive decay modes;|Vtd/Vts| directly from [bs]/[bd]
Use two independent hadronic system mass ranges
• 0.6 < MX < 1.0 (, “resonant” region)
• 1.0 < MX < 2.0
Together, comprise ~2/3 of total width
LLWI 2011: Rare Decays at BaBar 11Bruce SchummBaBar
B Xd Results
Result of fit to seven B Xd modes in high mass region
1.0 < MX < 2.0 GeV/c2
First observation of b d transition above resonance
(,) region
No evidence for new physics in bd transition
Relative accuracy of bd constraint approaching that for bs transition
Has impact of this constraint been fully examined?
Phys. Rev. D 82, 051101(R) (2010)
Theory Error
LLWI 2011: Rare Decays at BaBar 12Bruce SchummBaBar
Summary
New limits on B K and B KB(B K+) < 1.3 x 10-5 approaching SM expectation of B(B K+) 4 x 10-6
B(B ) < 3.2 x 10-7; consistent with expected
B(B) =
b (s,d) Penguins
No observed CP violation in b (s,d); -0.05 < ACP < 0.16 at 90% CL
First observations of bd in non-resonant region; |Vtd/Vts| from b→ d consistent with that from B mixing; relative accuracy of constraint approaching that of bs.
84.616. 10)1.3(
LLWI 2011: Rare Decays at BaBar 14Bruce SchummBaBar
Measured Regions for B Measured Regions for B X Xd(s)d(s)
K* Region
1.0 < Mhad < 2.0 2.0 < Mhad
XS
Xd
MEASURED
UNMEASURED
and Xd analyses
Xd analysis only
Mhad (MXd)
# 0
# bodies
# 0
# bodies
MEASURED
UNMEASURED
0.6 < Mhad < 1.0
LLWI 2011: Rare Decays at BaBar 15Bruce SchummBaBar
B B s s and SUSY Parameter Space (cont’d) and SUSY Parameter Space (cont’d)
Fate of “Snowmass” MSSM study points
… on some of our favorite scenarios …
LLWI 2011: Rare Decays at BaBar 16Bruce SchummBaBar
B B s s and SUSY Parameter Space (cont’d) and SUSY Parameter Space (cont’d)
C.F. Berger, J.S. Gainer, J.L. Hewett, T.G. Rizzo,“Supersymmetry Without Prejudice”, arXiv:0812.0980v1 [hep-ph]
Explore 107 points over 19-dimensional parameter space of CP-conserving MSSM
b s most effective constraint (72% of models surviving prior constraints are eliminated; better than direct searches for SUSY partners)
… and just in general.