6
Supplementary Figure 1 A B C D Colorectal cancer Colon cancer Proximal colon cancer Distal colon cancer

Supplementary Figure 1 A B C D Colorectal cancer Colon cancer Proximal colon cancer Distal colon cancer

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Supplementary Figure 1 A B C D Colorectal cancer Colon cancer Proximal colon cancer Distal colon cancer

Supplementary Figure 1

A

B

C

D

Colorectal cancer

Colon cancer

Proximal colon cancer

Distal colon cancer

Page 2: Supplementary Figure 1 A B C D Colorectal cancer Colon cancer Proximal colon cancer Distal colon cancer

ERectal cancer

Supplementary Figure 1 A-E Manhattan plots for genome-wide association analysis of five subgroups. The title of each manhattan plot was shown on the top of each figure. Horizontal axis indicates chromosomal position. Vertical axis indicates -log10 P-values by Cochran-Armitage trend test. Blue line corresponds to the P-value of 2.5 ×10-5.

Page 3: Supplementary Figure 1 A B C D Colorectal cancer Colon cancer Proximal colon cancer Distal colon cancer

Supplementary Figure 2

A Colorectal cancer

=1.03

=1.05

=1.02

C Proximal colon cancer

B Colon cancer

D Distal colon cancer

=1.04

E Rectal cancer

=1.02 Supplementary Figure 2 A-E Quantile-quantile plots for the test statistics (Cochran-Armitage 1 d.f. 2 trend tests) for genome-wide association analysis of five subgroups. The observed P-values (y axis) are compared with the expected P-values under the null distribution (x axis). Genomic inflation factor for each analysis is shown upper left corner of each figure.

Page 4: Supplementary Figure 1 A B C D Colorectal cancer Colon cancer Proximal colon cancer Distal colon cancer

160.5 160.55 160.6 160.65 160.7 160.75 160.8 160.85 160.9 160.95 1610

1

2

3

4

5

6

7 rs7758229

Supplementary Figure 3-lo

g10

P

Supplementary Figure 3 Regional plot of 6q26-q27 region. The top panel shows single-marker association results calculated by Cochran-Armitage trend test. Results from the screening stage and imputation analysis by MACH1.0 are indicated by black and red dots, respectively. The bottom panel shows the pairwise linkage disequilibrium for SNPs in HapMap JPT.

Page 5: Supplementary Figure 1 A B C D Colorectal cancer Colon cancer Proximal colon cancer Distal colon cancer

OR 95% CIPulmonary tuberculosis 1.06 0.77~1.47Keloidosis 1.27 0.93~1.75Chronic hepatitis B 0.93 0.66~1.30Drug rash 1.01 0.81~1.27Peripheral artery disease 1.11 0.88~1.41Arrhythmia 0.95 0.75~1.20Ischemic stroke 1.00 0.83~1.19Myocardial infarction 1.14 0.94~1.38

Overall 1.05 0.96~1.14

OR

Pheterogeneity = 0.79

Supplementary Figure 4

Supplementary Figure 4 Stratified analysis of each disease cohort used as controls in our study.The control samples used in our study were stratified by disease type and healthy volunteer were designated as controls. ORs and 95% CIs (per-allele) are calculated from fixed-effect models. The heterogeneity was calculated by Breslow-Day test.

rs7758229

Page 6: Supplementary Figure 1 A B C D Colorectal cancer Colon cancer Proximal colon cancer Distal colon cancer

Supplementary Figure 5

OR 95% CIAge (P heterogeneity = 0.0047)

60 1.50 1.32~1.70

> 60 1.18 1.07~1.31

First-degree family history (P heterogeneity = 0.074)

Yes 1.51 1.25~1.83

No 1.25 1.14~1.37

Supplementary Figure 4 Stratified analysis by age and first-degree family history for distal colon cancer. OR and 95% CIs (per-allele) are calculated from fixed-effect models. The heterogeneity was calculated by Breslow-Day test.

rs7758229