Upload
others
View
15
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Synchronous Reluctance Motor Drives:Still a Niche Technology?Istanbul , August 28, 2019
gianmar io.pel legr ino@pol i to . i t
ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino 1
Outline
◦ Introduction◦ Politecnico di Torino and the Power Electronics Innovation Center (PEIC)
◦ The Synchronous Reluctance Motor
◦ Background: history of the SyR motor technology◦ Where we Stand◦ Today’s Challenges◦ SyR-e: Synchronous Reluctance Evolution◦ Conclusion
2ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Politecnico di Torino
Founded in 1859, as Technical School for Engineers Politecnico di Torino since 1906
Home to Galileo Ferraris, pioneer of electrical engineering. He was a professor here, and a Senator of the former Reign of Italy
35000 students, 700 PhD students
850 Faculty members, 890 Administrative Technical staff
Budget (2018): 250 M€(55% State, 12% student fees, 30% projects)
Tuition fee:1000 - 2000 € / year
3ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Galileo Ferraris(1847 – 1897)
PEIC: The Power Electronics Innovation Center
Inter-Departmental Center dedicated to Power Electronics, from Si wafer to final applications, founded in 2017
20 faculty members, 2 technicians, 25 PhD students
Key lines of application: Transportation electrification, Energy, Industry
Capability of delivering TRL4 demonstrators, support to higher-TRL prototyping
Home to SLED 2019, September 9-10 2019 https://attend.ieee.org/sled-2019/
4ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
http://www.peic.polito.it/
https://attend.ieee.org/sled-2019/http://www.peic.polito.it/
PEIC: The Power Electronics Innovation Center
Inter-Departmental Center dedicated to Power Electronics, from Si wafer to final applications, founded in 2017
20 faculty members, 2 technicians, 25 PhD students
Key lines of application: Transportation electrification, Energy, Industry
Capability of delivering TRL4 demonstrators, support to higher-TRL prototyping
Home to SLED 2019, September 9-10 2019 https://attend.ieee.org/sled-2019/
5ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
http://www.peic.polito.it/
https://attend.ieee.org/sled-2019/http://www.peic.polito.it/
The Synchronous Reluctance Motor Technology
ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino 6
Background: Synchronous Reluctance Torque
Reluctance motors operate according to the principle of magnetic reluctance ….The rotor consisting of air and iron has the least possible magnetic reluctance in one direction and the highest possible reluctance in the direction perpendicular to that. Because the system always moves toward the lowest magnetic reluctance, rotational movement results.
Source: “Dynamic Energy Efficiency”, in Advance 1/2015, April 2015, Siemens AG
7ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Excitation oflow reluctance rotor axis
Excitation ofhigh reluctance rotor axis
Advantages of SyR Motors
8ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Source: new.abb.com
1. Standard distributed-winding stator
2. Rotor simplicity
- no windings substantial loss reduction, ease of manufacturing
- no PMs cost reduction, no de-magnetization, no back-emf voltage when uncontrolled
- low moment of inertia Dynamic performance
Vs Asynchronous Motors:
- smaller frame size per continuous torque or higher efficiency
- faster speed dynamics
Vs PM Synchronous Motors:
- lower cost of production (no PM cost, ease of manufacturing)
- higher transient overload capability (no demag)
Advantages of SyR Motors
9ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Source: new.abb.com
1. Standard distributed-winding stator
2. Rotor simplicity
- no windings substantial loss reduction, ease of manufacturing
- no PMs cost reduction, no de-magnetization, no back-emf voltage when uncontrolled
- low moment of inertia Dynamic performance
Vs Asynchronous Motors:
- smaller frame size per continuous torque or higher efficiency
- faster speed dynamics
Vs PM Synchronous Motors:
- lower cost of production (no PM cost, ease of manufacturing)
- higher transient overload capability (no demag)
Advantages of SyR Motors
10ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Source: new.abb.com
1. Standard distributed-winding stator
2. Rotor simplicity
- no windings substantial loss reduction, ease of manufacturing
- no PMs cost reduction, no de-magnetization, no back-emf voltage when uncontrolled
- low moment of inertia Dynamic performance
Vs Asynchronous Motors:
- smaller frame size per continuous torque or higher efficiency
- faster speed dynamics
Vs PM Synchronous Motors:
- lower cost of production (no PM cost, ease of manufacturing)
- higher transient overload capability (no risk for demagnetization)
Control: Mandatory Aspects
MTPA Operation
The high efficiency at partial load is obtained viaMaximum Torque per Ampere operation
Sensorless Control (no encoder)
This keeps the variable speed SyR motor drivecost competitive respect to the asynchronouscounterpart (exception: servo applications;
11ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Well Known Disadvantages
Low Power Factor and High Torque Ripple
- low PF
- high torque ripple
Need for precise Motor Commissioning (also said non standard control)
- respect of MTPA law
- stable Sensorless Control
High Speed Applications
- rotor ribs scale with 𝑛𝑛𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚2
Low Speed Applications
- high number of poles harmed by increase of p.u. excitation current
12ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Well Known Disadvantages
Low Power Factor and High Torque Ripple
- low PF
- high torque ripple
Non-standard control, need for precise Motor Commissioning
- respect of MTPA law
- stable Sensorless Control
High Speed Applications
- rotor ribs scale with 𝑛𝑛𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚2
Low Speed Applications
- high number of poles harmed by increase of p.u. excitation current
13ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
We will discuss each point later on
History of the Synchronous Reluctance Motor Technology
ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino 14
1923: The Idea of Flux Barriers
15ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Kostko, J.K., "Polyphase reaction synchronous motors,“American Institute of Electrical Engineers, Journal of the, 1923
1972: The Synduction Motor
First exemplar for both variable speed(constant V/f) or direct online application
Cast aluminium cage in the rotor, design optimized for best trade-off between a high pull-out torque (low 𝐿𝐿𝑞𝑞) and a low critical frequency of oscillation (high 𝐿𝐿𝑞𝑞)
Adoption limited to special applications, such as textile industry (multiple motors driven with the same converter, at same speed)
16ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Honsinger, V.B., “Synchronous reluctance motor”, US3652885, 1972 (Allis Chalmers, Ohio)Honsinger, V. B., "Inherently Stable Reluctance Motors Having Improved Performance," in IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. PAS-91, no. 4, pp. 1544-1554, July 1972
1990s: Variable Speed Drives
With the advent of modern power electronics and vector control, the SyR Motor solution became widely studied and developed◦ flux barriers Vs axially laminated (ALA)◦ Motor design rules
◦ saliency maximization
◦ torque ripple minimization
◦ Vector control schemes◦ First sensorless control schemes
17ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
[*] Kolehmainen, J. (2010). Synchronous reluctance motor with form blocked rotor. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion[**] Vagati, A. (1998) "Synchronous reluctance electrical motor having a low torque-ripple design." U.S. Patent No. 5,818,140
[*] [**]
(ALA)
(Flux Barriers)
Technology Development Timeline
18ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Source: Google Scholar
The Roaring Nineties
19ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Source: Google Scholar
Milestones: 1991
20ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
1991
Lipo, T. A. "Synchronous reluctance machines - a viable alternative for ac drives?“ Electric Machines and Power Systems 19.6 (1991): 659-671Xu, L., Xu, X., Lipo, T. A., Novotny, D. W. (1991). “Vector control of a synchronous reluctance motor including saturation and iron loss”, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 27(5), 977-985.
Milestones: 1992
21ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
1992 Vagati, A., Franceschini, G., Marongiu, I., & Troglia, G. P. (1992, October). “Design criteria of high performance synchronous reluctance motors”, In Conference Record of the 1992 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting (pp. 66-73). IEEE.
Milestones: 1993
22ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
1993
Staton, D. A., Miller, T. J. E., & Wood, S. E. (1993, July). “Maximising the saliency ratio of the synchronous reluctance motor”, In IEE Proceedings B (Electric Power Applications) (Vol. 140, No. 4, pp. 249-259). IET Digital Library.Betz, R. E., Lagerquist, R., Jovanovic, M., Miller, T. J., & Middleton, R. H. (1993). “Control of synchronous reluctance machines”, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 29(6), 1110-1122.
Milestones: 1994
23ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
1994
Matsuo, T., & Lipo, T. A. (1994). “Rotor design optimization of synchronous reluctance machine”, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 9(2), 359-365.Lagerquist, R., Boldea, I., & Miller, T. J. (1994). “Sensorless-control of the synchronous reluctance motor”, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 30(3), 673-682.Boldea, I., Fu, Z. X., & Nasar, S. A. (1994). “Performance evaluation of axially-laminated anisotropic (ALA) rotor reluctance synchronous motors”, IEEE transactions on industry applications, 30(4), 977-985.
Milestones:1996
24ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
1996 Kamper, M. J., Van der Merwe, F. S., & Williamson, S. (1996), “Direct finite element design optimisation of the cageless reluctance synchronous machine”, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 11(3), 547-555.
Milestones: 1998
25ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
1998 Vagati, A., Pastorelli, M., Francheschini, G., & Petrache, S. C. (1998), “Design of low-torque-ripple synchronous reluctance motors”, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 34(4), 758-765.
Milestones: 1999
26ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
1999
Ha, J. I., Kang, S. J., & Sul, S. K. (1999). Position-controlled synchronous reluctance motor without rotational transducer. IEEE transactions on Industry Applications, 35(6), 1393-1398.Consoli, A., Russo, F., Scarcella, G., & Testa, A. (1999). Low-and zero-speed sensorless control of synchronous reluctance motors. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 35(5), 1050-1057.
Milestones: 2000
27ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
2000 Vagati, A., Pastorelli, M., Scapino, F., & Franceschini, G. (2000). Impact of cross saturation in synchronous reluctance motors of the transverse-laminated type. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 36(4), 1039-1046.
Bottom Line
By 2000, the technology was ready, including motor design, vector control and sensorlesscontrol aspects
However, the interest on SyR motors did not ramp again until 2013 – 2014
Enabling opportunities:
- New regulations on electric motors effy
- Price volatility of rare-earth PMs
28ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Bottom Line
By 2000, the technology was ready, including motor design, vector control and sensorlesscontrol aspects
However, the interest on SyR motors did not ramp again until 2013 – 2014
Enabling opportunities:
- New regulations on electric motors effy
- Price volatility of rare-earth metals
29ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Improve the Efficiency
30ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Note: efficiency classes IE2, IE3 defined according to IEC 60034-30 standard
Reduce the Rare-Earth Magnet Content
31ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
June 2011
Consequent Boom of the SyR Motor Technology
32ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
IE2 andrare-earth peak
IE3 compulsory
Source: Google Scholar
Source: new.abb.com
Main Players on the Market (2019)
ABBIE4 SynRM range - High output SynRM range (M3AL/M3BL), 5.5–315 kW, Frames: 132–315
SiemensSimotics GP – Simotics SD (VSD4000), IES2 (EN 50598), 0.55 – 48 kWFrames: 80 - 200
KSB: REEL SuPremE, IE4/IE5, 0.55 .. 450 kW
Oemer: QSR SincroSPE, IE4, 0.3 .. 500 kW
Bonfiglioli: BSR Series, IES2 (IEC 61800-9-2), 0.3 .. 18.5 kW
Regal Beloit (Genteq HERMETIC): 0.5 .. 150 kW
… probably incomplete
33ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Source: Google Scholar
SyR motor technology: where we stand
ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino 34
Review of Known Disadvantages
Low Power Factor and High Torque Ripple
- low PF
- high torque ripple
Non-standard control, need for precise Motor Commissioning
- respect of MTPA law
- stable Sensorless Control
High Speed Applications
- rotor ribs scale with 𝑛𝑛𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚2
Low Speed Applications
- high number of poles harmed by increase of p.u. excitation current
35ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
About the Low Power Factor
Low Power Factor and High Torque Ripple
- low PF: related to the rotor ribs width
36ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Pellegrino, G., Armando, E., Guglielmi, P., & Vagati, A. (2009), “A 250kW transverse-laminated Synchronous Reluctance motor”, In 2009 13th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications. IEEE.
𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 𝜑𝜑𝑛𝑛 = 0.79 𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 𝜑𝜑𝑛𝑛 = 0.87
Torque Ripple
Low Power Factor and High Torque Ripple
- low PF
- high torque ripple:• rules for minimization (e.g. 𝒏𝒏𝒓𝒓 = 𝒏𝒏𝒔𝒔 ± 𝟒𝟒) + skewing, same as Asynchronous Motor• Numeric optimization is widely adopted
37ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Pellegrino, G., Cupertino, F., & Gerada, C. (2014), “Automatic design of synchronous reluctance motors focusing on barrier shape optimization”,IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 51(2), 1465-1474.
Low Power Factor and High Torque Ripple
- low PF
- high torque ripple
Non-standard control, need for precise Motor Commissioning
- respect of MTPA law
- stable Sensorless Control
Flux Maps
Motor Identification and Control
38ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
a) Experimental Flux Maps of ABB M3AL 90LA4, 1.1 kW SyR Motor; b) MTPA trajectory (red) and incremental saliency contours
Measured characteristics of 1.1 kW ABB SyR Motor (M3AL 90LA4)MTPA was off-line evaluated by flux maps manipulationIncremental saliency defines the area of feasibility of high-frequency
response based sensorless control
Low Power Factor and High Torque Ripple
- low PF
- high torque ripple
Need for precise Motor Commissioning
- respect of MTPA law
- stable Sensorless Control
High Speed Applications
- rotor ribs scale with 𝒏𝒏𝒎𝒎𝒎𝒎𝒎𝒎𝟐𝟐 T and PF drop
High-speed Scalability
39ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Ferrari, S.; Pellegrino, G.; Bonisoli, Elvio (2016) “Magnetic and structural co-design of synchronous reluctance electric machines in an open-source framework”, International Journal Of Mechanics And Control, Levrotto&Bella, pp. 8, 2016, Vol. 17, ISSN: 1590-8844
Torque reduction as the ribs size is increased to withstand a larger max speed
Low-speed Applications
Low Power Factor and High Torque Ripple
- low PF
- high torque ripple
Need for precise Motor Commissioning
- respect of MTPA law
- stable Sensorless Control
High Speed Applications
- rotor ribs scale with 𝑛𝑛𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚2
Low Speed Applications
- high number of poles harmed by p.u. excitation currentp.u. airgap grows PM assistance adjusts the Power Factor
40ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Boazzo, B., Vagati, A., Pellegrino, G., Armando, E., Guglielmi, P. (2014). Multipolar ferrite-assisted synchronous reluctance machines: A general design approach. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 62(2), 832-845.
14-pole, ferrite assisted SyR motor prototype, for direct drive application
Today ’s Challenges
ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino 41
Today’s Challenges
42ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Motor Design Keys
Develop trustable design tools • Balanced use of magnetic FEA• Saturated steel properties
Find the reliable minimum width of rotor ribs • Structural FEA in the loop• Fatigue test campaigns
Have a vector controlled test-rig • Flux maps identification for design validation
MTPA Law and Sensorless Control Keys
Know the motor parameters • Download from Motor Database• On-site Sensorless self-commissioning
Challenge 1: Motor Design Procedures
43ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Motor Design Keys
Develop trustable design tools • Balanced use of magnetic FEA• Saturated steel properties
Find the reliable minimum width of rotor ribs • Structural FEA in the loop• Fatigue test campaigns
Have a vector controlled test-rig • Flux maps identification for design validation
MTPA Law and Sensorless Control Keys
Know the motor parameters • Download from Motor Database• On-site Sensorless self-commissioning
Challenge 2: Standardize Motor Identification
44ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Motor Design Keys
Develop trustable design tools • Balanced use of magnetic FEA• Saturated steel properties
Find the reliable minimum width of rotor ribs • Structural FEA• Fatigue test campaigns
Have a vector controlled test-rig • Flux maps identification for design validation
MTPA Law and Sensorless Control Keys
Know the motor parameters • Download from Motor Database• On-site Sensorless self-commissioning
Armando, E., Boglietti, A., Bojoi, R., “Electrical drives measurements and testing: Past, Present and Future”, Tutorial at ECCE 2018, Portland, USA
Challenge 3: Plug-and-play Control
45ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Motor Design Keys
Develop trustable design tools • Balanced use of magnetic FEA• Saturated steel properties
Find the reliable minimum width of rotor ribs • Structural FEA• Fatigue test campaigns
Have a vector controlled test-rig • Flux maps identification for design validation
MTPA Law and Sensorless Control Keys
Know the motor parameters • Download from Motor Database• On-site Sensorless self-commissioningPescetto, P., Pellegrino, G. (2018). Automatic Tuning for SensorlessCommissioning of Synchronous Reluctance Machines Augmented With High-Frequency Voltage Injection. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 54(5), 4485-4493.
a) Explored points in the 𝑖𝑖𝑑𝑑 , 𝑖𝑖𝑞𝑞 plane;b) Obtained current vs flux curves (fit)
SyR-e: Synchronous Reluctance Evolution
ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino 46
https://sourceforge.net/projects/syr-e/
https://sourceforge.net/projects/syr-e/
What is SyR-e
SyR-e: Synchronous Reluctance – evolution is a design tool for synchronous e-machines
Launched on September 2014 in occasion of a Tutorial presented at ECCE - Pittsburg,from a collaboration between Politecnico di Torino and Politecnico di Bari, in Italy
It runs under Matlab (or GNU Octave), using FEMM as a client for magneto-static FEA
47ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
SyR-e is downloadable at https://sourceforge.net/projects/syr-e/, under the APACHE License, Version 2.0. FEMM is at www.femm.info
https://sourceforge.net/projects/syr-e/http://www.apache.org/licenses/http://www.femm.info/
GUI
SyR-e has a Graphical User Interface (GUI) built in Matlab, for ease of data/command input
Design examples are provided:◦ mot_01.fem, mot_01.mat
(default initial design)◦ RAWP.fem, RAWP.mat
(demo)
48ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
What SyR-e can do
The key feature of SyR-e is the capability of parametric FEA modelling and fast simulation
Moreover, SyR-e includes:◦ Design Equations (x,b plane approach) FEAfix: fixing the equations with few selected FEA runs◦ Optimization of selected design goals using MODE◦ Simplified copper temperature and centrifugal stress models◦ Scripts for advanced manipulation of FEA output (flux maps, effy maps)◦ Exporting capability to other CAD environments (Autocad, Infolytica, MotorCAD)
49ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Save Machine Post Processing\Start
Machine Types
Synchronous Reluctance and PM-assisted Synchronous Reluctance machines:◦ circular barriers◦ angled barriers (called SEG)◦ fluid barriers
Interior PM rotors (V-type IPM), Surface-mounted PM machines (SPM)
Distributed and concentrated winding stator configurations, multi-three-phase
50ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Circular barriers SEG barriers Surface-mounted PMSM Concentrated Windings
syrmDesign(x,b): Design Equations
Torque and power-factor contours are evaluated via design equations as a function of the two key parameters:◦ 𝑥𝑥 (rotor/stator split)◦ 𝑏𝑏 (iron/copper split)
51ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Example of Results
Any point of the plane corresponds to one machine design: torque and PF have different trends
Left to right (𝑥𝑥 up):◦ rotor gets bigger, slots get smaller
Up to down (𝑏𝑏 down):◦ Iron paths width decreases
All the designs have the same peak flux density(stator back iron and rotor flux carriers)
Stator teeth size can be calibrated separately via the dedicated parameter 𝑘𝑘𝑡𝑡
52ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
x = 0.55, b = 0.55 x = 0.68, b = 0.55
x = 0.68, b = 0.42
FEAfix: FEA-augmented Design Equations
53ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Ferrari, S., & Pellegrino, G. (2018). FEA-Augmented Design Equations for Synchronous Reluctance Machines. In 2018 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE) (pp. 5395-5402). IEEE.
a) Torque contours; b) Power Factor Contours
Main design inputs + costraints
Torque(x,b) and PF(x,b)
Selected design
x,b = 0.68, 0.55
FEAfix1
1 FEMM run
Design equations
Flux Barriers Shift
Recently added feature for building motors with asymmetric poles, and selectively eliminating torque ripple harmonics
54ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Ferrari, S., Pellegrino, G., Davoli, M., Bianchini, C. (2018). Reduction of Torque Ripple in Synchronous Reluctance Machines through Flux Barrier Shift. In 2018 XIII International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM) (pp. 2290-2296). IEEE.
Design Optimization
The Optimization tab commands MODE (Multi-Objective Differential Evolution) optimization
Key input fields:◦ Population size and # of generations◦ Inputs are selectable◦ Goals are selectable
Fast FEA evaluation:◦ 5 rotor positions per candidate,
random current phase angle during optimization
◦ Accurate re-evaluation of the Pareto-optimal designs (30 rotor positions)
55ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Cupertino, F., Pellegrino, G., & Gerada, C. (2014). Design of synchronous reluctance motors with multiobjective optimization algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 50(6), 3617-3627.
Copper Temperature Estimate
The inputs are:◦ Copper loss◦ Target copper temperature
SyR-e evaluates:◦ Estimated copper temperature◦ Phase current i0 = 1 p.u. and
resistance (given the number of turns)
A thermal network estimates the copper temperature given the housing temperature
Target and estimated temperaturemust be equal
56ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Structural co-design
The overspeed input field determines the size of the additional radial ribs included for rotor integrity
This under the assumption that each rib supports all the centrifugal load downstream of the respective layer, and imposing a stress limit equal to the yield strength of the selected silicon steel (e.g. 285 MPa for M600-50A)
This feature is on-line during design optimization
57ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Automatic or User-defined Winding
KOIL designs the winding distribution into slots automatically, given the slot/pole/phase number
Example: p = 3 (pole pairs), q = 2 (slots/pole/phase)
Takes advantage of odd-periodic symmetry conditions = one rotor pole and 6 stator slots
Optionally, bigger portions of the machine can be modelled, for example for modifying the winding set manually (e.g. all 36 slots)
58ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
6 slots 36 slots
The user can edit the winding scheme
FEA Evaluated Flux Maps
59ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
In a similar manner, output maps are produced:◦ dq flux maps◦ Torque and torque ripple maps
d axis flux linkage q axis flux linkage
Torque Pk-pk Torque ripple
Phase angle = 1000 is an internal code to launch the flux map feature
Magnetic Curves Manipulation (syreManipulateMM)
Out of the control GUI, additional scripts are available for flux maps manipulation:◦ Torque and torque factor [Nm/A] vs current◦ MTPA and MTPV◦ Torque and power vs speed profiles
60ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Id, Iq control LUTs
[Nm] vs [A]
Conclusion
The literature on SyR motors and drives is rich and well established: key concepts were known as early as in the early 2000s. This technology has advantages and disadvantages, expectedly
However, it is consistently gaining momentum as Super Premium efficiency (IE4) solution for variable speed drives. There is potential also as servomotor and direct-on-line, constant speed applications.
Most of all, what is missing is engineering and standardization
A wider diffusion will be possible if the tight connection between motor design and (sensorless) control design aspects will be better formalized and standardized
Key points are machine testing standards, including test bed and self-commissioning procedures
SyR-e is online, to contribute to this process
61ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Thank you!QUESTIONS, PLEASE
gianmar io.pel legr ino@pol i to . i t
ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino 62
References (1/3)
1) Kostko, J.K., "Polyphase reaction synchronous motors,“ American Institute of Electrical Engineers, Journal of the, 19232) Honsinger, V.B., “Synchronous reluctance motor”, US3652885, 19723) Honsinger, V. B., "Inherently Stable Reluctance Motors Having Improved Performance," in IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems,
vol. PAS-91, no. 4, pp. 1544-1554, July 19724) Kolehmainen, J. (2010). Synchronous reluctance motor with form blocked rotor. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion5) Vagati, A. (1998) "Synchronous reluctance electrical motor having a low torque-ripple design." U.S. Patent No. 5,818,1406) Lipo, T. A. "Synchronous reluctance machines - a viable alternative for ac drives?“ Electric Machines and Power Systems 19.6 (1991): 659-6717) Xu, L., Xu, X., Lipo, T. A., Novotny, D. W. (1991). “Vector control of a synchronous reluctance motor including saturation and iron loss”, IEEE
Transactions on Industry Applications, 27(5), 977-985.8) Vagati, A., Franceschini, G., Marongiu, I., & Troglia, G. P. (1992). “Design criteria of high-performance synchronous reluctance motors”,
In Conference Record of the 1992 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting (pp. 66-73). IEEE.9) Staton, D. A., Miller, T. J. E., & Wood, S. E. (1993, July). “Maximising the saliency ratio of the synchronous reluctance motor”, In IEE Proceedings B
(Electric Power Applications) (Vol. 140, No. 4, pp. 249-259). IET Digital Library.10) Betz, R. E., Lagerquist, R., Jovanovic, M., Miller, T. J., & Middleton, R. H. (1993). “Control of synchronous reluctance machines”, IEEE Transactions
on Industry Applications, 29(6), 1110-1122.11) Matsuo, T., & Lipo, T. A. (1994). “Rotor design optimization of synchronous reluctance machine”, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 9(2),
359-365.
63ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
References (2/3)
12) Lagerquist, R., Boldea, I., & Miller, T. J. (1994). “Sensorless-control of the synchronous reluctance motor”, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 30(3), 673-682.
13) Boldea, I., Fu, Z. X., & Nasar, S. A. (1994). “Performance evaluation of axially-laminated anisotropic (ALA) rotor reluctance synchronous motors”, IEEE transactions on industry applications, 30(4), 977-985. Kamper, M. J., Van der Merwe, F. S., & Williamson, S. (1996), “Direct finite element design optimisation of the cageless reluctance synchronous machine”, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 11(3), 547-555.
14) Kamper, M. J., Van der Merwe, F. S., & Williamson, S. (1996), “Direct finite element design optimisation of the cageless reluctance synchronous machine”, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 11(3), 547-555.
15) Vagati, A., Pastorelli, M., Francheschini, G., & Petrache, S. C. (1998), “Design of low-torque-ripple synchronous reluctance motors”, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 34(4), 758-765.
16) Ha, J. I., Kang, S. J., & Sul, S. K. (1999). Position-controlled synchronous reluctance motor without rotational transducer. IEEE transactions on Industry Applications, 35(6), 1393-1398.
17) Consoli, A., Russo, F., Scarcella, G., & Testa, A. (1999). Low-and zero-speed sensorless control of synchronous reluctance motors. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 35(5), 1050-1057.
18) Vagati, A., Pastorelli, M., Scapino, F., & Franceschini, G. (2000). Impact of cross saturation in synchronous reluctance motors of the transverse-laminated type. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 36(4), 1039-1046. Pellegrino, G., Armando, E., Guglielmi, P., & Vagati, A. (2009), “A 250kW transverse-laminated Synchronous Reluctance motor”, In 2009 13th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications. IEEE.
64ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
References (3/3)
19) Pellegrino, G., Cupertino, F., & Gerada, C. (2014), “Automatic design of synchronous reluctance motors focusing on barrier shape optimization”, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 51(2), 1465-1474.
20) Pellegrino, G., Cupertino, F., & Gerada, C. (2014), “Automatic design of synchronous reluctance motors focusing on barrier shape optimization”, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 51(2), 1465-1474.
21) Ferrari, S.; Pellegrino, G.; Bonisoli, Elvio (2016) “Magnetic and structural co-design of synchronous reluctance electric machines in an open-source framework”, International Journal Of Mechanics And Control, Levrotto&Bella, pp. 8, 2016, Vol. 17, ISSN: 1590-8844
22) Boazzo, B., Vagati, A., Pellegrino, G., Armando, E., Guglielmi, P. (2014). Multipolar ferrite-assisted synchronous reluctance machines: A general design approach. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 62(2), 832-845.
23) Armando, E., Boglietti, A., Bojoi, R., “Electrical drives measurements and testing: Past, Present and Future”, Tutorial at ECCE 2018, Portland, USA24) Pescetto, P., Pellegrino, G. (2018). Automatic Tuning for Sensorless Commissioning of Synchronous Reluctance Machines Augmented With High-
Frequency Voltage Injection. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 54(5), 4485-4493.25) Ferrari, S., Pellegrino, G. (2018). FEA-Augmented Design Equations for Synchronous Reluctance Machines. In 2018 IEEE Energy Conversion
Congress and Exposition (ECCE) (pp. 5395-5402). IEEE.26) Cupertino, F., Pellegrino, G., Gerada, C. (2014). Design of synchronous reluctance motors with multiobjective optimization algorithms. IEEE
Transactions on Industry Applications, 50(6), 3617-362727) Ferrari, S., Pellegrino, G., Davoli, M., Bianchini, C. (2018). Reduction of Torque Ripple in Synchronous Reluctance Machines through Flux Barrier
Shift. In 2018 XIII International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM) (pp. 2290-2296). IEEE.
65ACEMP OPTIM 2019, Istanbul - © 2019 Gianmario Pellegrino
Synchronous Reluctance Motor Drives:�Still a Niche Technology?OutlinePolitecnico di TorinoPEIC: The Power Electronics Innovation CenterPEIC: The Power Electronics Innovation CenterDiapositiva numero 6Background: Synchronous Reluctance TorqueAdvantages of SyR MotorsAdvantages of SyR MotorsAdvantages of SyR MotorsControl: Mandatory AspectsWell Known DisadvantagesWell Known DisadvantagesDiapositiva numero 141923: The Idea of Flux Barriers1972: The Synduction Motor1990s: Variable Speed DrivesTechnology Development TimelineThe Roaring NinetiesMilestones: 1991Milestones: 1992Milestones: 1993Milestones: 1994Milestones:1996Milestones: 1998Milestones: 1999Milestones: 2000Bottom LineBottom LineImprove the EfficiencyReduce the Rare-Earth Magnet ContentConsequent Boom of the SyR Motor TechnologyMain Players on the Market (2019)Diapositiva numero 34Review of Known DisadvantagesAbout the Low Power FactorTorque RippleMotor Identification and ControlHigh-speed ScalabilityLow-speed ApplicationsDiapositiva numero 41Today’s ChallengesChallenge 1: Motor Design ProceduresChallenge 2: Standardize Motor IdentificationChallenge 3: Plug-and-play ControlDiapositiva numero 46What is SyR-eGUIWhat SyR-e can doMachine TypessyrmDesign(x,b): Design EquationsExample of ResultsFEAfix: FEA-augmented Design EquationsFlux Barriers ShiftDesign OptimizationCopper Temperature EstimateStructural co-designAutomatic or User-defined WindingFEA Evaluated Flux MapsMagnetic Curves Manipulation (syreManipulateMM)ConclusionThank you!References (1/3)References (2/3)References (3/3)