Upload
cutler
View
33
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
TARGETED OCCULTATION STUDIES (WITH SOFIA & GROUND BASED TELESCOPES). Michael J. Person, MIT (Based on Poster 39.07 J. L. Elliot & S. D. Kern) DPS, Kuiper Belt Workshop 2003 September 1. EXAMPLES OF KBOS* WITH ATMOSPHERES. Pluto and Triton Similar sizes and densities N 2 (CO, CH 4 ) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
TARGETED OCCULTATION STUDIES (WITH SOFIA & GROUND BASED
TELESCOPES)
Michael J. Person, MIT
(Based on Poster 39.07 J. L. Elliot & S. D. Kern)
DPS, Kuiper Belt Workshop
2003 September 1
EXAMPLES OF KBOS* WITH ATMOSPHERES
Pluto-Charon images from HST. The bodies are separated by 19,400 km (after Albrecht et al. 1994). The Triton image (left) is from Voyager 2.
Pluto enhanced
• Pluto and Triton– Similar sizes and densities
– N2 (CO, CH4)
• Atmosphere on Charon?
*physical definition
REQUIREMENTS FOR AN ATMOSPHERE
(Data from Brown & Ziegler 1980)
Temperature (K)
KrCH4
N2
Ar
CO
Pre
ssur
e (
µba
r)
0.5 flux dropfor Triton
occultations
30 35 40 45 50 55
10 3
10
1
10 –1
10 2
10 –2
10 –3
•Right temperature
–Not too warm–Volatiles escape
–Not too cold–Not enough sublimation
–Blackbody temperature for 30AU is about 50K
•Sufficiently massive–How massive?
= (GM/k)(mµ/rT)–Mass overcomes escape (e.g. Titan)
–Kr atmosphere on less massive objects?
•Appropriate surface volatiles–N2, CO, CH4, NH3, Ne, Ar, Kr
–Primordial, or replenished
OBJECTIVES FOR KBO OCCULTATIONS
• Accurate diameters– Calibrate thermal diameters
• SIRTF
• Sub-millimeter
• Search for atmospheres– The largest KBOs may retain atmospheres
• Search for binary companions– Models differ on the semi-major axis
distribution for KBO binaries
PROSPECTS FOR ATMOSPHERES
Quoar (0.10)
Varuna (0.07)
Charon (0.40)
Pluto (0.53-0.74)
Triton (0.75)0.04
0.64
Geometric Albedo (V)
Ixion N2 Atmospheres
Atmosphere?
log
radi
us (
km)
8 6 4 2 0 –2H magnitude
CHARON OCCULTATION (Walker 1980)
(after Elliot & Young 1991)
CHIRON OCCULTATION RESULTS
Adapted from Elliot et. al. 1995 Nature
TARGETED OCCULTATIONS BY KBOs*
• Charon– 1980 April 7—South Africa
• Single chord (Walker at SAAO)
• Pluto– 1988 June 9 (P8)-southwestern Pacific
• KAO and several ground-based sites, 7 successful
– 2002 July 20 (P126A)-South America• Many attempts, only 2 successful
– 2002 August 21 (P131.1) - Hawaii and western US
• 9 telescopes successful
• (2060) Chiron– 1993 November 7 (Ch02) - western US
• Two telescopes successful
– 1994 March 9 (Ch08) - Brazil• KAO successful
• Triton– 1993 July 10 (Tr60)
• one chord with KAO; 4 ground-based stations, none successful
– 1995 August 9 (Tr148A, Tr148B)• 9 light curves from 6 sites,
including the KAO; central flash from IRTF
– 1997 July 18 (Tr176)• 2 chords with C14's; amateur
chords too
– 1997 November 4 (Tr180)• central flash with FGS on HST; 1
ground-based site miss; 2 ground-based sites cloudy; Lear jet had problems
– 2001 August 25 (Tr231)• light curve with Sutherland 1.9-m
*physical definition
CHALLENGES FOR OCCULTATIONSBody Mag
(R)Da(AU) Radius
(km)Radius(arcsec)
Occ.Obs.
Triton 13.4 30.1 1438 ± 17c 0.067 5
Pluto 14.0 30.6 1214 ± 20d 0.055 4
Charon 16.0 30.6 621 ± 21e 0.028 1
(2060) Chiron 17.1 12.1 90 ± 7f 0.010 2
(5145) Pholus 19.2 17.9 95 ± 13f 0.007 0
(10199) Chariklo 17.5 13.1 137 ± 15f 0.014 0
(20000) Varuna 19.8 43.2 450 ± 65g 0.014 0
(28978) Ixion 19.1 42.9 ~600 0.019 0
(50000) Quaoar 18.6 43.4 610 ± 65h 0.019 0
Canonical KBO 20.5 40.0 300 0.010 0
•aheliocentric distance as of 2003 May 21
• Strategy #1: Small telescopes (0.36 m; fixed or mobile?) – Limiting stellar magnitude 16.2– Set up network in western US (or Chile & Australia)– At least two occultation chords needed (m too large for
astrometry?)• Strategy #2: Chase with SOFIA (2.7 m)
– Limiting stellar magnitude 18.4– Need accurate prediction (miss is expensive!)– Second occultation chord or astrometry (from another telescope)
• Strategy #3: Large telescope (6.5->10 m ) – Limiting stellar magnitude 19.3– Initial prediction accurate to 0.025 arcsec (=> 1/5 success rate)– Single occultation chord & astrometry with the same telescope
KBO RADII FROM OCCULTATIONS
EVENTS PER YEAR
Telescope Strategy
(aperture, m)
Limiting Stellar R
Mag
Events per Year per KBO, R
Location Factor,
fl
Weather Factor,
fw
Combined Factor,
Observable Events per Yearb, Nobs
Portable (0.36)
16.2 1 0.17 0.75 0.13 ~6
Airborne (2.5)
18.4 12 0.58 0.95 0.55 ~200
Fixed (6.5)
19.3 30 0.0067 0.60 0.0040 ~4
bfor a single telescope and the current sample of 29 KBOs brighter than an H magnitude of 5.2.
KBO OCCULTATIONS
• Objectives– Establish accurate diameters– Search for close companions– Search for atmospheres
• Approach– Brightest KBOs as targets– Three strategies
(portable, airborne, large fixed)• Needs
– Discovery of more bright KBO’s in dense star fields• Star density in the galactic plane
~ 10 times the average• More events per good orbit
– Improved orbits, high astrometric precision• 17 orbits better than 0.1"; 79 better than 1"• How much large telescope time to use for predictions vs. observations?
Ch08 prediction, 1994 March 9: observations made with the KAO&
from South Africa (SAAO)