TASK 210 - Connecticut International Airport ... constructed using standard trench excavation and backfill techniques with depths ranging from 4- ... Task 210 – Subsurface Site

TASK 210: SUBSURFACE SITE INVESTIGATION

REPORT

Bradley International Airport Sanitary Sewer Replacement/Realignment

Schoephoester Road Windsor Locks, Connecticut

ConnDOT Assignment No. 204-4333 ConnDOT Project No. 0165-0416

Prepared for: Prepared by:

State of Connecticut Maguire Group Inc. Department of Transportation 2080 Silas Deane Highway Newington, Connecticut 06131 Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067

March 8, 2012

Task 210 – Subsurface Site Investigation Report ConnDOT Project No. 0165-0416

ConnDOT Assignment No. 204-4333 Page i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page Number 1.0 INTRODUCTION………………………………………………….….……………..………….…….1

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION……………………………………………….…….……………………...........3

2.1 Background……………………………………………………………….………………....3

3.0 LOCAL ENVIRONMENT & RECEPTORS…………………………..……………..........................4

3.1 Geology…….……………………………………………………………..……………….....4

3.2 Groundwater & Topography..…….………………………………………..………………...4

4.0 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION……………………….……..…….……………………………..5

4.1 Geoprobe® Soil Borings & Soil Sample Analyses………………………..……...................5

4.2 Groundwater Sample Collection & Analyses………………….…………..….……………..6

4.3 Project Quality Assurance/Quality Control Practices………….…………..….……………..6

5.0 DISCUSSION OF SAMPLE RESULTS………………….……………..………...……………......8

5.1 Regulatory Criteria………………………………………………….…………….………….8

5.2 Results of Soil Sample Analyses..…..………..…………...….….………..….…..……...….10

5.3 Results of Groundwater Grab Sample Analyses……………….….…………………….…..11

5.4 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Samples…...…….……….…………………………….12

5.5 Data Quality Assessment and Data Usability Evaluation (DQA/DUE)…..…………..…….12

6.0 DISCUSSION OF AFFECTED RESOURCES………….………………………..………….…….14

6.1 Areas of Environmental Concern………………………………………….……………….15

6.2 Groundwater Area of Environmental Concern…………...……………….………………..15

6.3 Low-Level Area of Environmental Concern...…………...……………….………………..15

7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS……………………..………….………………………..….……………..16

8.0 LIMITATIONS………………………………..………….………………………..……………….17

FIGURES

Figure 1 – Site Location Plan………………………………………………………...………………………2

Figures 2and 3 - Task 210 - Soil Boring and Sample Location Plan

TABLES

Tables 1(a) and 1(e) – Results of Geoprobe® Boring Soil Sample Analyses

Table 2 – Results of Groundwater Grab Sample Analyses

Tables 3 – Results of QA/QC Samples Analyses

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A – Boring Logs

APPENDIX B – Laboratory Reports

APPENDIX C – DQA & DUE Worksheets


1.0 INTRODUCTION

On behalf of the Connecticut Department of Transportation (ConnDOT), Maguire Group Inc.

(MGI) has conducted a Task 210 – Subsurface Site Investigation Report in association with the

Sanitary Sewer Line Replacement/Realignment adjacent to Schoephoester Road at Bradley

International Airport (BIA) in Windsor Locks, Connecticut.

Based upon a review of the project Design Plans by others, the project will include the

installation of approximately 1,550-feet of new 12-inch diameter sanitary sewer piping and

manholes. The new sanitary sewer will be installed adjacent to existing sanitary sewer line,

which will be abandoned in place. Approximately 1,100-feet of the sanitary sewer will be

constructed using standard trench excavation and backfill techniques with depths ranging from 4-

feet to 25-feet below existing grade. The remaining 450-feet of sanitary sewer installation will

be installed utilizing trenchless excavation techniques under Schoephoester Road. This Task 210

was conducted in areas of anticipated construction activities for the proposed project. Figure 1

depicts the project area.

The purpose of this Task 210 – Subsurface Site Investigation Report is to verify the absence or

presence and location of subsurface contamination, and to assess the potential pollutant impacts

to be encountered during construction of the proposed sanitary sewer. It is anticipated that Task

310 Plans, Specifications and Estimate will subsequently be prepared to assess construction

related activities (i.e. proper storage, classification, transport and disposal of contaminated

materials), in relationship to the environmental conditions prevalent within the project limits, as

well as to specify remedial work to be included in the Contract Bid Documents.

ConnDOT Assignment No. 204-4333 Page 1


FIGURE 1 - SITE LOCATION PLAN Bradley International Airport Windsor Locks, Connecticut

Site Location




2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

2.1 Background

ConnDOT is proposing to replace and realign an existing sanitary sewer line adjacent to and

under Schoephoester Road at Bradley International Airport in Windsor Locks, Connecticut. The

project will include the installation of approximately 1,550-feet of new 12-inch diameter sanitary

sewer piping and manholes. The new sanitary sewer will be installed adjacent to existing

sanitary sewer line, which will be abandoned in place. Approximately 1,100-feet of the sanitary

sewer constructed using standard trench excavation and backfill techniques with depths ranging

from 4-feet to 25-feet below existing grade. The remaining 450-feet of sanitary sewer

installation will be installed utilizing trenchless excavation techniques under Schoephoester

Road.

Numerous environmental investigations have been conducted at Bradley International Airport for

various construction projects. The results of the various environmental investigations indicated

that soil and groundwater in the area has been impacted by historic site operations and “releases”

of regulated materials to the environment. The following contaminants of concern (COCs) have

been identified: volatile organic compounds (VOCs), RCRA metals, polynuclear aromatic

hydrocarbons (PAHs) and total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH).

This Task 210 was conducted in areas of anticipated construction activities for the proposed

project. The site area and sample locations are depicted on Figures 2 and 3 – Soil Boring and

Sample Location Plans included at the end of this Report.


3.0 LOCAL ENVIRONMENT & RECEPTORS

3.1 Geology

The Site is located within the Hartford Basin of the Central Lowlands, which is underlain by

Portland Arkose bedrock according to the Bedrock Geological Map of Connecticut. Portland

Arkose is described as a reddish brown arkose and is also known as brownstone. The surficial

materials at the site are classified as sand overlying fines according to the Geologic Map of the

Windsor Locks Quadrangle. These materials are composed of well to poorly sorted sands,

gravels, silts and clays with few to no boulders.

3.2 Groundwater & Topography

The CTDEEP has designated the groundwater beneath the Site and surrounding area as “GA -

May Not Meet Current Standards”. This classification indicates that groundwater may not be

suitable for direct human consumption without treatment because of waste discharges, spills or

leaks of chemicals, or land-use effects. The state’s goal is to restore the groundwater to drinking

water quality. Groundwater beneath the site is assumed to flow in southerly direction towards

the Farmington River. Groundwater was encountered at a depth of approximately 4-feet below

ground surface in boring GP-13.

The Site is located within the Farmington River Basin within the Farmington River Regional

Basin within the Connecticut River Major Basin. Rainbow Brook and Seymour Hollow Brook

are two (2) surface water bodies located near the site. Rainbow Brook is located approximately

2,000 feet, south-southwest of the site and Seymour Hollow Brook is located approximately

4,000 feet to the east-southeast. Both water bodies are classified by the CTDEEP as Class A

surface waters. This classification indicates that the surface water body has the following

designated uses: potential drinking water supply, fish and wildlife habitat, recreational use,

agricultural supply, industrial supply, and other legitimate uses, including navigation. Both

surface water bodies eventually discharge to the Farmington River, which is located to the south

of the site.



4.0 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION

Based upon the previous environmental investigations conducted at the BIA and historic site

operations, a comprehensive sampling program was conducted in the areas of anticipated

construction activities. The following subsections detail the investigation.

4.1 Geoprobe® Soil Borings & Soil Sample Analyses

Thirteen (13) borings, GP-1 through GP-13 were advanced by Logical Environmental Solutions,

LLC. under the direction of Maguire in the areas of anticipated construction activities, utilizing a

Geoprobe® direct push unit. Borings GP-1 through GP-5 were advanced to a maximum depth

of 16-feet or refusal in and borings GP-6 through GP-13 were advanced to a maximum depth of

12-feet or refusal. The proposed Geoprobe® boring locations (GP-1 to GP-13) are depicted on

the Figures 2 and 3 - Task 210: Subsurface Site Investigation, Soil Boring and Sample Location

Plan at the end of this Report.

The soil samples were visually inspected in the field for staining, and were described as to

physical characteristics and soil type. Soil boring logs were generated in the field by the on-site

qualified technician. In addition, the soil samples were screened in the field for total volatile

organic compounds utilizing a Photovac photoionization detector (PID). The boring logs denote

the types of soil encountered, the depth to groundwater and/or bedrock, the total depth reached in

each boring, and the highest observed PID reading. Copies of the boring logs are included at the

end of this report in Appendix A.

Based upon field screening results and visual observations, two (2) soil samples were collected

from borings GP-1 through GP-5 and one (1) soil sample was collected from borings GP-6

through GP-13. A total of 18 soil samples were collected, placed in laboratory-supplied

glassware, stored in an ice-filled cooler, and submitted to the Phoenix Environmental

Laboratories, Inc. in accordance with chain-of-custody procedures. All soil samples were

analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) utilizing EPA Method 8260, semi-volatile

organic compounds (SVOCs) utilizing EPA Method 8270, extractable total petroleum



hydrocarbons (ETPH) utilizing the Connecticut ETPH method, and total and SPLP RCRA 8

metals.

All Geoprobe® soil borings were back-filled upon completion utilizing clean sand and/or

hydrated bentonite. Soil borings within paved areas were backfilled upon completion and

patched with bituminous pavement (“cold patch”). All down-hole sampling equipment was

decontaminated in accordance with Maguire’s Task 210: Subsurface Site Investigation Report

Work Plan, dated February 2, 2012.

4.2 Groundwater Sample Collection & Analyses

One (1) groundwater grab sample was collected from the boring GP-13 shown on the sample

location plan, Figure 3. The groundwater grab sample was collected by inserting one-half inch

diameter, schedule 40, 10-slot, PVC well screen and riser casing into the borehole. The well

screen was temporarily installed approximately 4-feet into the observed water table depth.

Dedicated polyethylene tubing was placed into the temporary well and the groundwater grab

sample was drawn through the tubing using a low-flow peristaltic pump.

The groundwater sample was place in laboratory-supplied glassware, stored in an ice-filled

cooler and submitted to Phoenix Environmental Laboratories, Inc. for analysis for VOCs (EPA

Method 8260), SVOCs (EPA Method 8270), ETPH (CT-ETPH), and Total and Dissolved RCRA

8 metals. Groundwater samples collected for Dissolved-phase RCRA metals were field filtered

using a 0.45-µm membrane filter prior to acidification.

4.3 Project Quality Assurance/Quality Control Practices

The CTDEEP’s Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) Guidance was used to ensure

that the analytical results generated during the investigation are of known and appropriate

quality. Specifically, the Laboratory Quality Assurance Control Reasonable Confidence

Protocols (RCPs) were utilized for all laboratory analytical methods. The Laboratory Quality

Assurance and Quality Control, Data Quality Assessment and Data Usability Evaluation



(DQA/DUE) Guidance were utilized to ensure that the analytical data used is of known and

sufficient level of quality for the intended purpose. See Sections 5.4 and 5.5 of this report for a

discussion of the QA/QC procedures and data usability evaluation.

To assess the collection of samples in the field in terms of the sampling techniques and

decontamination procedures followed, quality control and quality assurance samples were

collected and analyzed. A trip blank was prepared by Phoenix Environmental Laboratories, Inc.

and a field blank sample was collected in the field. The field blank sample was prepared by

pouring laboratory supplied de-ionized water over decontaminated sampling equipment and

collecting the resulting rinsate in appropriate containers. The trip and field blank samples were

stored with the daily samples in the sample cooler until delivery to the laboratory for analysis.

The field blank was analyzed for the same parameters specified for the daily samples and the trip

blank was analyzed for VOCs.

All samples collected in the field were stored in a manner that preserves the integrity of the

sample chemistry. Samples intended for organic analyses were stored in an ice-filled cooler until

delivery to the laboratory. Chain-of-Custody (COC) forms were filled out and accompanied all

samples collected as a legal record of possession of the sample. The COC was initiated in the

field and accompanied the containers during sample collection, transportation to the lab,

analysis, and final disposal of the sample. All sampling equipment was either dedicated to a

specific sample or was decontaminated prior to and between each use. Sampling equipment was

not be placed near solvents, gasoline, or other materials that may have impacted the sample

integrity.



5.0 DISCUSSION OF SAMPLE RESULTS

5.1 Regulatory Criteria

The CTDEEP adopted Remediation Standard Regulations (Regulations of Connecticut State

Agencies, Section 22a-133k-1 to 3 and 22a-133q-1) as of January 31, 1996. The Remediation

Standard Regulations (RSRs) apply to any site undergoing voluntary remediation under Public

Acts 95-183 or 95-190, a transfer of an “establishment” under Public Act 95-183, or any site as

ordered by the CTDEEP Commissioner. The Regulations also outline the processes for

establishing alternative site-specific numerical standards for certain sites, upon approval by the

CTDEEP.

The RSRs criteria applicable to the soil and groundwater sampled during this investigation are

summarized below. The application of these RSRs to the results of the laboratory analyses from

this investigation are discussed in subsections 5.2 and 5.3 of this section.

Soils Criteria: The RSRs are organized into two sets of criteria: the Direct Exposure Criteria

(DEC) and the Pollutant Mobility Criteria (PMC). The DEC and PMC are briefly explained in

the following sub-sections, in relation to how they would be applicable to the types of analyses

conducted on the soil samples collected for this investigation. Please refer to the RSRs for a

complete explanation of the Regulations.

Direct Exposure Criteria

The purpose of the Direct Exposure Criteria (DEC) is to protect human health from risks

associated with the direct contact with or ingestion of various common soil contaminants. The

DEC are applicable to soil within approximately fifteen (15) feet of the ground surface.

Concentrations of contaminants are evaluated based upon mass-based analyses and different

criteria are established for residential and industrial/commercial properties. The use of the less

stringent commercial/industrial standards requires the placement of an environmental land use

restriction on the property.



The DEC is not applicable to inaccessible soils, including soil more than four (4) feet below the

ground surface, two (2) feet below pavement greater than three (3) inches thick, or below an

existing building, provided that an Environmental Land Use Restriction (ELUR) is placed in

effect for the property.

Pollutant Mobility Criteria

The purpose of the Pollutant Mobility Criteria (PMC) is to evaluate the potential for

contaminants to leach from the soil in concentrations that may degrade groundwater quality.

Different numerical criteria are established for GA and GAA groundwater areas, versus GB

groundwater areas. Since the site is situated in a GA groundwater area, the more stringent

criteria apply for most of the site.

Groundwater Criteria: Contaminants in the groundwater are compared either to background

quality or the Groundwater Protection Criteria (GWPC), the Volatilization Criteria (VC), as well

as the Surface Water Protection Criteria (SWPC). However, ConnDOT has had numerous

discussions with CTDEEP staff with regard to groundwater encountered during “Construction

Projects” and the applicability of the RSRs to these situations. Based on the guidance provided

by CTDEEP, groundwater samples collected for “Construction Projects” are compared to the

effluent limits for the “General Permit for the Discharge of Groundwater Remediation

Wastewater Directly to Surface Water” (GP to Surface Water) and the “General Permit for the

Discharge of Groundwater Remediation Wastewater Directly to Sanitary Sewer” (GP to

Sanitary Sewer) to determine if Groundwater Areas of Environmental Concern (GW AOECs)

exist within the project limits.



5.2 Results of Soil Sample Analyses

Soil samples collected during the advancement of Geoprobe® borings, GP-1 to GP-13, were sent

to Phoenix Environmental Laboratories, Inc. for laboratory analyses. Summaries of the

laboratory results from the Geoprobe® boring soil samples are presented in Tables 1(a) to 1(e),

which are located at the end of this report, and copies of the soil sample analytical results are

included in Appendix B. The following summarizes the results of the analyses conducted on the

soil samples.

The results of the laboratory analyses did not indicate the presence of extractable total petroleum

hydrocarbons (ETPH) at concentrations above analytical detection limits in any of the soil

samples collected and analyzed.

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were not detected above analytical detection limits (ND) in

any of the soil samples collected and analyzed with the exception of soil sample GP-2 (2’-4’).

Isopropylbenzene was detected in soil sample GP-2 (2’-4’) at a concentration of 0.0064 mg/kg.

The CTDEEP has not established an RSR criteria for this compounds. No other VOCs were

detected at concentrations above analytical detection limits (ND).

Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) were not detected above analytical detection limits

(ND) in any of the soil samples collected and analyzed with the exception of soil samples GP-5

(10’-12’), and GP-13 (2’-4’). Fluoranthene (0.3 mg/kg) and pyrene (0.31 mg/kg) were detected

in soil sample GP-5 (10’-12’) at concentrations above analytical detection limits, but below the

applicable CTDEEP RSR criteria. No other SVOCs were detected in soil sample GP-5 (10’-12’)

at concentrations above analytical detection limits (ND).

Benzo(b)fluoranthene (0.33 mg/kg), fluoranthene (0.41 mg/kg), phenanthrene (0.31 mg/kg), and

pyrene (0.41 mg/kg) were detected in soil sample GP-13 (2’-4’) at concentrations above

analytical detection limits, but below the applicable CTDEEP RSR criteria. No other SVOCs

were detected in soil sample GP-13 (2’-4’) at concentrations above analytical detection limits

(ND).



Total metals, barium, chromium, lead, and silver were detected at various concentrations in the

soil samples collected and analyzed for this project. None of the detected concentrations of total

metals were present in the soil samples at levels exceeding the applicable RDEC or I/C-DEC.

Leachable arsenic, leachable barium, leachable chromium and leachable lead were detected in

the soil samples at various concentrations below the applicable GA PMC with the exception of

leachable lead. Leachable lead was detected in soil samples GP-1 (2’-4’), GP-2 (2’-4’), and GP-

13 (2’-4’) at concentrations of 0.05 mg/L, 0.022 mg/L, and 0.018 mg/L, respectively, which

exceed the GA PMC of 0.015 mg/L for lead. No other leachable metals were present at

concentrations exceeding the applicable CTDEEP RSR criteria.

5.3 Results of Groundwater Grab Sample Analyses

A groundwater grab sample, GP-13 GW, was collected from boring location, GP-13 within the

project limits. The results of the laboratory analyses of the groundwater grab sample did not

indicate the presence of ETPH or VOCs at concentrations above analytical detection limits (ND).

SVOCs, acenaphtene (0.08 ug/L), acenaphthylene (0.1 ug/L), benzo(a)anthracene (0.2 ug/L),

benzo(a)pyrene (0.22 ug/L), benzo(b)fluoranthene (0.33 ug/L), benzo(k)fluoranthene (0.11

ug/L), chrysene (0.23 ug/L), dibenz(a,h)anthracene (0.03 ug/L), indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (0.12

ug/L), and phenanthrene (0.72 ug/L) were detected in the groundwater grab sample GP-13.

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene was detected in the groundwater grab sample at a concentration of 0.03

ug/L, which exceeds the CTDEEP GP to Surface Water effluent limits of 0.01 ug/L for this

compound. No other detected SVOCs were present at concentrations exceeding the established

effluent limits in the CTDEEP GP to Surface Water. The concentration of total polynuclear

aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) detected, 2.14 ug/L, is below both the GP to Surface Water and

GP to Sanitary Sewer effluent limits for PAHs of 5.0 ug/L and 500 ug/L, respectively. No other

SVOCs were detected in the groundwater grab sample GP-13 GW at concentrations above

analytical detection limits (ND).

Total arsenic (0.019 mg/L), barium (0.148 mg/L), and chromium (0.002 mg/L) were detected in

the groundwater grab sample GP-13 GW at concentrations below the applicable CTDEEP GP to



Surface Water and GP to Sanitary Sewer effluent limits with the exception of total arsenic. Total

arsenic was detected in groundwater grab sample GP-13 GW at a concentration of 0.019 mg/L,

which exceeds the CTDEEP GP to Surface Water effluent limit of 0.000021 mg/L, but is below

the CTDEEP GP to sanitary sewer effluent limit of 0.1 mg/L for this compound. Dissolved

arsenic (0.01 mg/L) and barium (0.113 mg/L) were detected in the groundwater grab sample GP-

13 GW at concentrations below the applicable CTDEEP GP to Surface Water and GP to Sanitary

Sewer effluent limits with the exception of dissolved arsenic. Dissolved arsenic was detected in

groundwater grab sample GP-13 GW at a concentration of 0.01 mg/L, which exceeds the

CTDEEP GP to Surface Water effluent limit of 0.000021 mg/L, but is below the CTDEEP GP to

sanitary sewer effluent limit of 0.1 mg/L for this compound. No other total or dissolved metals

were present in the groundwater grab sample at concentrations exceeding analytical detection

limits (ND).

5.4 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Samples

The trip blank sample, TP-1, and field blank sample, FB-1, did not contain any detectable

concentrations of contaminants. A summary of the laboratory results from the QA/QC samples

is presented in Table 3 located at the end of this report, and copies of the analytical results

associated with the quality assurance/quality control samples are included in Appendix B.

5.5 Data Quality Assessment and Data Usability Evaluation (DQA/DUE)

Eighteen (18) soil samples and one (1) groundwater sample were collected from within the

project limits and submitted to a state-certified analytical laboratory for analyses using the

CTDEEP Reasonable Confidence Protocols (RCPs) established for VOCs, SVOCs, ETPH, and

metals. The samples were collected to verify the absence or presence and location of subsurface

contamination, and to assess the potential pollutant impacts to be encountered during

construction of the proposed roadway improvements.



A data quality assessment and data usability evaluation was performed for the data generated in

accordance with CTDEEP guidance and noted the following quality control non-conformances.

Copies of the DQA and DUE worksheets are included in Appendix C

Non-conformances related to LCS/LCSD recoveries, LCS/LCSD RPD, MS/MSD recoveries,

ICALs, and CCVs responses do not have significant bearings on the accuracy and usability of the

data for its intended purposes. In all cases the non-conformances have no impact to the data

usability and the data is considered of sufficient quality and precision using multiple lines of

evidence.

Based on the above findings from the DQA and DUE, the analytical data is of adequate quality

and of sufficient accuracy, precision and sensitivity to confirm that contaminants of concern are

present in the soil at concentrations exceeding the CTDEEP RSRs. Task 310 Plans,

Specifications and Estimate will be required to assess construction related activities (i.e. proper

storage, classification, transport and disposal of contaminated materials), in relationship to the

environmental conditions prevalent within the project limits, as well as to specify remedial work

to be included in the Contract Bid Documents.



6.0 DISCUSSION OF AFFECTED RESOURCES

Based upon the results of the laboratory analyses performed on soil and groundwater samples for

this Task 210 investigation, two (2) areas of environmental concern (AOECs) for soil have been

identified where contaminants are present at concentrations that exceed the applicable CTDEEP

RSR criteria. The results of the Task 210 – SSIR indicated the presence of leachable lead at

concentrations exceeding the applicable CTDEEP GA PMC in soils at the project site. In

addition, low concentrations of several VOCs and PAHs were detected in soils at several

locations. The contamination was detected in soil ranging from 0 to 12 feet below grade at the

project site. Also, material generated during the trenchless installations shall be considered a

controlled material requiring special management and disposal.

The results of the Task 210 – SSIR indicate that groundwater at the project site has been

impacted by total and dissolved arsenic, dissolved cadmium and dibenz(a,h)anthracene at

concentrations that exceed the effluent limits established in the CTDEEP “General Permit for the

Discharge of Groundwater Remediation Wastewater Directly to Surface Water”. However, the

concentrations of contaminants detected in the groundwater are below the effluent limits

established in the CTDEEP “General Permit for the Discharge of Groundwater Remediation

Wastewater Directly to Sanitary Sewer”. In addition, numerous other PAH compounds were

detected in the groundwater at the project site, but at concentrations below the applicable effluent

limits or for which effluent limits have not been established for the individual compounds. The

concentration of total combined PAHs detected in the groundwater grab sample is below the

effluent limits in both the GP to Surface Water and GP to Sanitary Sewer. The entire project

limits have been designated a Groundwater Area of Environmental Concern (GWAOEC).

In addition, one (1) low-level area of environmental concern (LLAOEC) has been identified,

where contaminants were detected at concentrations below the applicable CTDEEP RSR

standards, but above laboratory detection limits. The locations of the AOECs and LLAOEC

within the project limits are discussed in the following sections.



6.1 Areas of Environmental Concern

AOEC#1 Samples GP-1, and GP-2 (0.0’ to 10.0’)

Analytical results from the soil samples collected from borings GP-1, and GP-2 indicated the

presence of leachable lead at concentrations above the applicable CTDEEP RSR criteria in soil

samples collected from 2-feet to 4-feet below the ground surface. Leachable lead was not

detected in soil samples collected from 10-feet to 12-feet below the ground surface. In addition,

isopropylbenzene was detected at low concentrations in the soil from GP-2 (2’ – 4’).

AOEC#2 Samples GP-13

Analytical results from the soil sample collected from boring GP-13 indicated the presence of

leachable lead at concentrations above the applicable CTDEEP RSR criteria. In addition, several

SVOCs were detected at low concentrations in the soils.

6.2 Groundwater Area of Environmental Concern

GW AOEC: Entire Project Limits

Analytical results from the groundwater grab sample collected from boring GP-13 and

designated GP-13 GW indicated the presence of total and dissolved arsenic, and

dibenz(a,h)anthracene at concentrations that exceed the applicable CTDEEP GP to Surface

Water effluent limits. In addition, numerous PAHs were detected at low concentrations in the

groundwater grab sample collected from GP-13.

6.3 Low-Level Area of Environmental Concern

LLAOEC #A: Sample GP-5

Analytical results form the soil sample collected from boring GP-5 indicated the presence of low

concentrations of SVOCs.



7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

The results of the Task 210 – Subsurface Site Investigation Report for the Sanitary Sewer

Replacement/Realignment at Bradley International Airport in Windsor Locks, Connecticut

indicate the presence of leachable lead at elevated concentrations in soil ranging from 0 to 10’

below grade. Low concentrations of one VOC and SVOCs were also detected in the soil

samples. In addition, groundwater has been impacted with total and dissolved arsenic and

dibenz(a,h)anthracne at concentrations that exceed the CTDEEP GP to Surface Water effluent

limits. Low concentrations of numerous PAHs were also detected in the groundwater within the

project limits. If groundwater is encountered during construction activities it may not be

discharged to surface water and will require discharge to sanitary sewer in accordance with

CTDEEP’s GP to Sanitary Sewer. Two (2) Areas of Environmental Concern (AOECs) and one

(1) Low-Level Area of Environmental Concern (LLAOEC) for soil have been identified within

the project limits. Also, the entire project limits have been designated a Groundwater Area of

Environmental Concern (GW AOEC). Special considerations for treatment/disposal, dewatering

activities, and worker health & safety must be given to these areas in order to ensure compliance

with all local, State and Federal laws. Task 310 Plans, Specifications, and Estimate are therefore

recommended for the areas of construction within the AOECs and LLAOEC described in

Section 6.0 above.



8.0 LIMITATIONS

All work product and reports provided by Maguire Group Inc. (Maguire) in connection with the

performance of this Task 210 - Subsurface Site Investigation Report are subject to the following

limitations:

1. The observations described in this report were made under the conditions stated therein. The

conclusions presented in the report were based solely upon the services described therein,

and not on scientific tasks or procedures beyond the scope of described services provided to

ConnDOT.

2. In preparing this report, Maguire has relied on certain information provided by State and

local officials and information and representations made by other parties referenced therein,

and on information contained in the files of State and/or local agencies made available to

Maguire at the time of this investigation. To the extent that such files are missing,

incomplete or not provided to Maguire, Maguire is not responsible. Although there may

have been some degree of overlap in the information provided by these various sources,

Maguire did not attempt to independently verify the accuracy or completeness of all

information reviewed or received during the course of this investigation.

3. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based in part upon the

data from subsurface explorations. The nature and extent of variations between these

explorations may not become evident until further explorations are completed. If variations

or other latent conditions become evident, it will be necessary to re-evaluate the conclusions

and recommendations of this report.

4. The water level readings made for this investigation were made at the times and conditions

stated on the boring logs. However, it must be noted that fluctuations in the level of the

groundwater may occur due to variations in rainfall, passage of time and other factors.

Should additional data become available in the future, these data should be reviewed by

Maguire, and the conclusions and recommendations presented herein modified accordingly.



5. Where quantitative laboratory analyses have been conducted by an outside certified

laboratory, Maguire has relied upon the data provided, and has evaluated the data in

accordance with CTDEEP DQA/DUE Guidance, but has not conducted an independent

evaluation of the reliability of these tests.

6. If the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based, in part, upon

various types of chemical data, then the conclusions and recommendations are contingent

upon the validity of such data. These data have been reviewed and interpretations made in

the report. It should be noted that variations in the types and concentrations of contaminants

and variations in their flow paths may occur due to seasonal water table fluctuations, past

disposal practices, the passage of time, and other factors. Should additional chemical data

become available in the future, these data should be reviewed by Maguire and the

conclusions and recommendations presented herein modified accordingly.

7. Chemical analyses were performed for specific parameters during the course of this

investigation, as described in the text. However, it should be noted that testing for all known

chemical constituents was not performed. The conclusions and recommendations contained

in this report are based only upon the chemical constituents for which testing was

accomplished.

The following qualifications apply to the undersigned’s opinion:

The activities described and opinions included herein are based on information gathered during

this subsurface site investigation, which was limited in scope in adherence to the terms of our

agreement. The professional opinion provided herein is based on the information described in

this report.

The information contained herein was prepared for the use of ConnDOT solely in conjunction

with the task descriptions for this assignment. The conclusions and recommendations set forth in

this report are based on site conditions at the time of the investigation. Future studies and



FIGURES



TABLES


TABLE 1(a) Results of Geoprobe® Boring Soil Sample Analyses

Bradley Airport Sanitary Sewer Replacement Windsor Locks, Connecticut

Boring I.D.: Sample Depth:

GP-1

2’-4’

GP-1

10’-12’

GP-2

2’-4’

GP-2

10’-12’

CTDEEP PMC GA Groundwater

Area

CTDEEP DEC Residential/

Commercial & Industrial

CT ETPH - (mg/kg) ND ND ND ND 500 mg/kg 500/2,500 mg/kg

VOCs - Method 8260 (mg/kg)

Isopropylbenzene

ND

ND

0.0064

ND

None Established

None Established

SVOCs - Method 8270 (mg/kg) ND ND ND ND

Total RCRA 8 Metals – mg/kg

Barium

Chromium

Lead

32.5

14.2

11.7

15.7

6.42

3.85

33.7

10.1

10.3

15.0

8.02

4.16

Not Applicable

4,700/140,000 mg/kg

None Established

500/1,000 mg/kg

SPLP RCRA 8 Metals – mg/L

Arsenic

Barium

Chromium

Lead

0.008

0.174

0.029

0.05

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.005

0.073

0.012

0.022

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.05 mg/L

1.0 mg/L

0.05 mg/L

0.015 mg/L

Not Applicable

ND Not Detected at a concentration exceeding the laboratory’s detection limit (see laboratory reports for compound specific detection limits) The compounds listed above are those that were detected - please see laboratory reports for full lists of compounds and their specific detection limits.

TABLE 1(b) Results of Geoprobe® Boring Soil Sample Analyses



GP-3

2’-4’

GP-3

10’-12’

GP-4

2’-4’

GP-4

10’-12’


Area




VOCs - Method 8260 (mg/kg) ND ND ND ND



Barium

Chromium

Lead

22.7

7.33

5.05

10.8

4.46

2.7

28.1

9.16

5.87

22.3

8.58

5.26

Not Applicable

4,700/140,000 mg/kg

None Established

500/1,000 mg/kg


Barium

0.013

ND

0.015

0.015

1.0 mg/L

Not Applicable


TABLE 1(c) Results of Geoprobe® Boring Soil Sample Analyses



GP-5

2’-4’

GP-5

10’-12’

GP-6

2’-4’

GP-7

2’-4’


Area





SVOCs - Method 8270 (mg/kg)

Fluoranthene

Pyrene

Total SVOCs

ND

ND

ND

0.3

0.31

0.61

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

5.6 mg/kg

4.0 mg/kg

1,000/2,500 mg/kg

1,000/2,500 mg/kg


Barium

Chromium

Lead

24.5

7.39

4.24

24.2

7.87

8.37

25.3

6.77

3.46

42.3

11.0

5.52

Not Applicable

4,700/140,000 mg/kg

None Established

500/1,000 mg/kg


Barium

Chromium

0.024

ND

0.019

0.01

ND

ND

ND

ND

1.0 mg/L

0.05 mg/L

Not Applicable


TABLE 1(d) Results of Geoprobe® Boring Soil Sample Analyses



GP-8

2’-4’

GP-9

2’-4’

GP-10

2’-4’

GP-11

2’-4’


Area







Barium

Chromium

Lead

Silver

43.7

11.1

4.63

ND

39.6

11.1

5.27

ND

16.8

8.17

6.9

0.37

20.7

7.93

10.4

ND

Not Applicable

4,700/140,000 mg/kg

None Established

500/1,000 mg/kg


Barium

ND

0.022

0.017

0.015

1.0 mg/L

Not Applicable


TABLE 1(e) Results of Geoprobe® Boring Soil Sample Analyses



GP-12

2’-4’

GP-13

2’-4’


Area



CT ETPH - (mg/kg) ND ND 500 mg/kg 500/2,500 mg/kg

VOCs - Method 8260 (mg/kg) ND ND

SVOCs - Method 8270 (mg/kg)

Benzo(b)fluoranthene

Fluoranthene

Phenanthrene

Pyrene

Total SVOCs

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.33

0.41

0.31

0.41

1.46

1.0 mg/kg

5.6 mg/kg

4.0 mg/kg

4.0 mg/kg

1.0/7.8 mg/kg

1,000/2,500 mg/kg

1,000/2,500 mg/kg

1,000/2,500 mg/kg


Barium

Chromium

Lead

20.7

8.22

6.65

30.8

9.79

31.8

Not Applicable

4,700/140,000 mg/kg

None Established

500/1,000 mg/kg


Barium

Lead

ND

ND

0.013

0.018

1.0 mg/L

0.015 mg/L

Not Applicable


TABLE 2 Results of Groundwater Grab Sample Analyses Bradley Airport Sanitary Sewer Replacement

Windsor Locks, Connecticut Sample I.D.:

GP-13 GW

CTDEEP GP to “A” Surface Water Effluent

Limits

CTDEEP GP to Sanitary Sewer Effluent Limits

CT ETPH (mg/L) ND 5 mg/L 100 mg/L

VOCs - EPA Method 8260 (ug/L)

Total VOCs

ND

ND

10 ppb

5,000 ug/L

SVOCs - EPA Method 8270 (ug/L)

Acenaphthene

Acenaphthylene

Benzo(a)anthracene

Benzo(a)pyrene

Benzo(b)fluoranthene

Benzo(k)fluoranthene

Chrysene

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene

Phenanthrene

Total PAHs

Total SVOCs (Excluding PAHs)

0.08

0.1

0.2

0.22

0.33

0.11

0.23

0.03

0.12

0.72

2.14

ND

None Established

None Established

0.49 ug/L

0.49 ug/L

None Established

0.49 ug/L

None Established

0.01 ug/L

0.49 ug/L

None Established

5 ug/L

10 ug/L

None Established

None Established

None Established

None Established

None Established

None Established

None Established

None Established

None Established

None Established

500 ug/L

2,000 ug/L

Total RCRA 8 Metals – mg/L

Arsenic

Barium

Chromium

0.019

0.148

0.002

0.000021 mg/L

None Established

0.342 mg/L

0.1 mg/L

5.0 mg/L

1.0 mg/L

Dissolved RCRA 8 Metals – mg/L

Arsenic

Barium

0.01

0.113

0.000021 mg/L

None Established

0.1 mg/L

5.0 mg/L

ND – Not Detected (see laboratory reports for compound specific detection limits) The compounds listed above are those that were detected - please see laboratory reports for full lists of compounds and their specific detection limits.

TABLE 3 Results of QA/QC Sample Analyses Bradley Airport Sanitary Sewer Replacement

Windsor Locks, Connecticut

Sample I.D.:

FB-1

TB-1

CTDEEP GP to “A” Surface Water

Effluent Limits

CTDEEP GP to Sanitary Sewer Effluent Limits

CT ETPH (mg/L) ND NA 5 mg/L 100 mg/L

VOCs - EPA Method 8260 (ug/L) ND ND

SVOCs - EPA Method 8270 (ug/L) ND NA

Total RCRA 8 Metals - mg/L ND NA

Dissolved RCRA 8 Metals - mg/L ND NA

ND Not Detected at a concentration exceeding the laboratory’s detection limit (see laboratory reports for compound specific detection limits) The compounds listed above are those that were detected - please see laboratory reports for full lists of compounds and their specific detection limits. NA Not Analyzed for this procedure


APPENDIX A Boring Logs


GEOPROBE SOIL BORING LOGProject:

Location:

Client:

Boring:

Inspector:

Date:

Driller:

Soil Description: and = 35-50% some = 20-35% little = 10-20% trace = 1-10%

Depth to Water:

Boring Depth:Rig:

Boring Dia.:

Page: 1 of 1

Logical Environmental Solutions354 South River Road

Tolland, CT 06084 Truck, Portable & ATV/Backhoe-Mounted Geoprobes

Dep

th(fe

et)

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

16.0

Sym

bol

Description

Dep

th(fe

et)

PID

(ppm

) Sample Interval

Bradley Airport Sewer Replacement

Windsor Locks, CT

Maguire Group Inc.

GP-1

M. Bazzano

2-13-2012

Ground SurfaceBrown SILT, trace fine Sand & Gravel

Dark-Brown fine to medium Sand, little fine to coarse Gravel & Silt

Orange-Brown fine to medium SAND, little Silt (moist)

0.00.4

4.0

12.0

0.3

0.2

0.1

Macro Core 0'-4'

Macro Core 4'-8'

Macro Core 8'-12'

W. Lineberry dry

12'Geoprobe 540U

2"

Refusal on Cobble/Bedrock? at 12'


Location:

Client:

Boring:

Inspector:

Date:

Driller:


Depth to Water:

Boring Depth:Rig:

Boring Dia.:

Page: 1 of 1



Dep

th(fe

et)

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

16.0

Sym

bol

Description

Dep

th(fe

et)

PID

(ppm

) Sample Interval


Windsor Locks, CT

Maguire Group Inc.

GP-2

M. Bazzano

2-13-2012




0.0

0.8

4.5

12.0

0.2

0.1

0.1

Macro Core 0'-4'

Macro Core 4'-8'

Macro Core 8'-12'

W. Lineberry dry

12'Geoprobe 540U

2"



Location:

Client:

Boring:

Inspector:

Date:

Driller:


Depth to Water:

Boring Depth:Rig:

Boring Dia.:

Page: 1 of 1



Dep

th(fe

et)

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

16.0

Sym

bol

Description

Dep

th(fe

et)

PID

(ppm

) Sample Interval


Windsor Locks, CT

Maguire Group Inc.

GP-3

M. Bazzano

2-13-2012




0.0

0.8

5.0

13.0

0.5

0.2

0.2

0

Macro Core 0'-4'

Macro Core 4'-8'

Macro Core 8'-12'

Macro Core 12'-13'

W. Lineberry dry

13'Geoprobe 540U

2"



Location:

Client:

Boring:

Inspector:

Date:

Driller:


Depth to Water:

Boring Depth:Rig:

Boring Dia.:

Page: 1 of 1



Dep

th(fe

et)

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

16.0

Sym

bol

Description

Dep

th(fe

et)

PID

(ppm

) Sample Interval


Windsor Locks, CT

Maguire Group Inc.

GP-4

M. Bazzano

2-13-2012




0.0

0.8

5.0

14.0

0.3

0.1

0.1

0.1

Macro Core 0'-4'

Macro Core 4'-8'

Macro Core 8'-12'

Macro Core 12'-14'

W. Lineberry dry

14'Geoprobe 540U

2"



Location:

Client:

Boring:

Inspector:

Date:

Driller:


Depth to Water:

Boring Depth:Rig:

Boring Dia.:

Page: 1 of 1



Dep

th(fe

et)

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

16.0

Sym

bol

Description

Dep

th(fe

et)

PID

(ppm

) Sample Interval


Windsor Locks, CT

Maguire Group Inc.

GP-5

M. Bazzano

2-13-2012

Ground SurfaceBrown SILT, trace fine Sand & GravelDark-Brown fine to medium Sand, little fine to coarse Gravel & Silt


Brown to Light-Brown fine to medium SAND, little Silt (wet/very moist at 14')

0.00.41.0

12.0

16.0

0.4

0.1

0.1

0.1

Macro Core 0'-4'

Macro Core 4'-8'

Macro Core 8'-12'

Macro Core 12'-16'

W. Lineberry 14'

16'Geoprobe 540U

2"

End of Boring at 16'


Location:

Client:

Boring:

Inspector:

Date:

Driller:


Depth to Water:

Boring Depth:Rig:

Boring Dia.:

Page: 1 of 1



Dep

th(fe

et)

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

16.0

Sym

bol

Description

Dep

th(fe

et)

PID

(ppm

) Sample Interval


Windsor Locks, CT

Maguire Group Inc.

GP-6

M. Bazzano

2-13-2012


Brown SILT, trace fine Sand

0.00.5

4.0

0.4 Macro Core 0'-4'

W. Lineberry Dry

4'Hand Auger

4"

End of Boring at 4'

Boring Completed with Hand Auger Due toUtility Conflicts/Private Property Access Issues


Location:

Client:

Boring:

Inspector:

Date:

Driller:


Depth to Water:

Boring Depth:Rig:

Boring Dia.:

Page: 1 of 1



Dep

th(fe

et)

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

16.0

Sym

bol

Description

Dep

th(fe

et)

PID

(ppm

) Sample Interval


Windsor Locks, CT

Maguire Group Inc.

GP-7

M. Bazzano

2-13-2012



Orange-Brown fine SAND & SILT (very moist)

Brown fine to medium SAND, little Silt (wet at 6')

Gray-Brown fine to medium SAND, little Silt (wet)

0.00.5

3.5

5.0

7.0

12.0

0.2

0

0

Macro Core 0'-4'

Macro Core 4'-8'

Macro Core 8'-12'

W. Lineberry 6'

12'Geoprobe 540U

2"



Location:

Client:

Boring:

Inspector:

Date:

Driller:


Depth to Water:

Boring Depth:Rig:

Boring Dia.:

Page: 1 of 1



Dep

th(fe

et)

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

16.0

Sym

bol

Description

Dep

th(fe

et)

PID

(ppm

) Sample Interval


Windsor Locks, CT

Maguire Group Inc.

GP-8

M. Bazzano

2-13-2012




Brown fine to medium SAND, little Silt (very moist)


0.0

0.8

3.5

5.0

7.0

12.0

0.5

0.2

0

Macro Core 0'-4'

Macro Core 4'-8'

Macro Core 8'-12'

W. Lineberry 7'

12'Geoprobe 540U

2"



Location:

Client:

Boring:

Inspector:

Date:

Driller:


Depth to Water:

Boring Depth:Rig:

Boring Dia.:

Page: 1 of 1



Dep

th(fe

et)

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

16.0

Sym

bol

Description

Dep

th(fe

et)

PID

(ppm

) Sample Interval


Windsor Locks, CT

Maguire Group Inc.

GP-9

M. Bazzano

2-13-2012




Brown fine to medium SAND, little Silt (very moist)


0.0

0.8

3.5

5.0

7.0

12.0

0.2

0.1

0

Macro Core 0'-4'

Macro Core 4'-8'

Macro Core 8'-12'

W. Lineberry 7'

12'Geoprobe 540U

2"



Location:

Client:

Boring:

Inspector:

Date:

Driller:


Depth to Water:

Boring Depth:Rig:

Boring Dia.:

Page: 1 of 1



Dep

th(fe

et)

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

16.0

Sym

bol

Description

Dep

th(fe

et)

PID

(ppm

) Sample Interval


Windsor Locks, CT

Maguire Group Inc.

GP-10

M. Bazzano

2-13-2012


Orange-Brown to Brown fine to coarse SAND, little Silt, trace fine Gravel

Gray-Brown fine to medium SAND, little Silt, trace fine Gravel (wet)

Light-Brown fine to coarse SAND, little Silt (wet)

0.00.5

7.0

10.0

12.0

0.3

0.1

0

Macro Core 0'-4'

Macro Core 4'-8'

Macro Core 8'-12'

W. Lineberry 7'

12'Geoprobe 540U

2"



Location:

Client:

Boring:

Inspector:

Date:

Driller:


Depth to Water:

Boring Depth:Rig:

Boring Dia.:

Page: 1 of 1



Dep

th(fe

et)

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

16.0

Sym

bol

Description

Dep

th(fe

et)

PID

(ppm

) Sample Interval


Windsor Locks, CT

Maguire Group Inc.

GP-11

M. Bazzano

2-13-2012


Orange-Brown to Brown fine to coarse SAND, little Silt, trace fine Gravel

Brown fine to medium SAND, little Concrete, Asphalt, trace fine to coarse Gravel (FILL)

Brown fine to coarse SAND, little Silt (wet)

0.00.5

5.0

7.5

12.0

7.2

0.4

0.1

Macro Core 0'-4'

Macro Core 4'-8'

Macro Core 8'-12'

W. Lineberry 7.5'

12'Geoprobe 540U

2"



Location:

Client:

Boring:

Inspector:

Date:

Driller:


Depth to Water:

Boring Depth:Rig:

Boring Dia.:

Page: 1 of 1



Dep

th(fe

et)

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

16.0

Sym

bol

Description

Dep

th(fe

et)

PID

(ppm

) Sample Interval


Windsor Locks, CT

Maguire Group Inc.

GP-12

M. Bazzano

2-13-2012


Brown fine to medium SAND, little Silt (wet at 6.5')

Dark-Brown Organic SILT with seams of fine to medium SAND, little Silt (wet)


0.0

0.8

7.0

9.0

12.0

0.6

0.2

0.1

Macro Core 0'-4'

Macro Core 4'-8'

Macro Core 8'-12'

W. Lineberry 6.5'

12'Geoprobe 540U

2"



Location:

Client:

Boring:

Inspector:

Date:

Driller:


Depth to Water:

Boring Depth:Rig:

Boring Dia.:

Page: 1 of 1



Dep

th(fe

et)

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

16.0

Sym

bol

Description

Dep

th(fe

et)

PID

(ppm

) Sample Interval


Windsor Locks, CT

Maguire Group Inc.

GP-13

M. Bazzano

2-13-2012


Dark-Brown fine to medium SAND, little Silt

Brown fine to coarse SAND, little Silt

Brown fine SAND & SILT

Brown fine to medium SAND, little Silt (wet at 7')

Dark-Gray to Black Organic SILT (wet)


0.00.4

2.53.0

5.0

9.0

12.0

1.0

0.4

0.2

Macro Core 0'-4'

Macro Core 4'-8'

Macro Core 8'-12'

W. Lineberry 7'

12'Geoprobe 540U

2"


Groundwater Grab Sample Collected


APPENDIX B Laboratory Reports


BB43180 - BB43200

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Sample ID#s:

Attn: Ms Jane WitherellMaguire Group2080 Silas Deane HighwayRocky Hill, CT 06067

Project ID: BRADLEY AIRPORT SEWER

This laboratory is in compliance with the QA/QC procedures outlined in EPA 600/4-79-019, Handbook for Analytical Quality in Water and Waste Water, March 1979, SW846 QA/QC and NELAC requirements of procedures used.

This report contains results for the parameters tested, under the sampling conditions described on the Chain Of Custody, as received by the laboratory.

A scanned version of the COC form accompanies the analytical report and is an exact duplicate of the original.

Sincerely yours,

Laboratory DirectorPhyllis Shiller

If you have any questions concerning this testing, please do not hesitate to contact Phoenix Client Services at ext. 200.

NELAC - #NY11301CT Lab Registration #PH-0618MA Lab Registration #MA-CT-007ME Lab Registration #CT-007NH Lab Registration #213693-A,BNJ Lab Registration #CT-003NY Lab Registration #11301PA Lab Registration #68-03530RI Lab Registration #63VT Lab Registration #VT11301

587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O. Box 370, Manchester, CT 06040Telephone (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823

Sample Information Custody Information

Matrix:

Location Code:

Rush Request:

P.O.#:

Collected by:Received by:

Analyzed by:

SOIL

MAGU-DAS

72 Hour

165-416

02/13/12

SW

see "By" below

Laboratory Data

GP-1 2-4 FT

Phoenix ID: BB43180

02/14/12

14:00

14:02

Parameter Result RL Units Date By Reference

FOR: Attn: Ms Jane WitherellMaguire Group2080 Silas Deane HighwayRocky Hill, CT 06067

Analysis ReportFebruary 21, 2012

Time

Date Time

587 East Middle Turnpike, P.O.Box 370, Manchester, CT 06045 Tel. (860) 645-1102 Fax (860) 645-0823

Environmental Laboratories, Inc.

SDG ID: GBB43180

Client ID:


< 0.34 Silver 0.34 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 1.0 Arsenic 1.0 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg32.5 Barium 0.34 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 0.34 Cadmium 0.34 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg14.2 Chromium 0.34 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 0.08 Mercury 0.08 02/15/12 RS SW-7471mg/Kg11.7 Lead 0.34 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 1.4 Selenium 1.4 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 0.010 SPLP Silver 0.010 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L0.008 SPLP Arsenic 0.004 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L0.174 SPLP Barium 0.010 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.005 SPLP Cadmium 0.005 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L0.029 SPLP Chromium 0.010 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.0004 SPLP Mercury 0.0004 02/15/12 RS 1312/SW7471mg/L0.050 SPLP Lead 0.010 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.020 SPLP Selenium 0.020 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/LCompleted Total Metals Digest 02/14/12 AG SW846 - 3050

Completed SPLP Metals Digestion 02/15/12 D/D SW846-3005

92 Percent Solid 02/14/12 JL E160.3%Completed Soil Extraction for SVOA 02/14/12 RB/R SW3545

Completed Extraction of CT ETPH 02/14/12 BS/F 3545

Completed Mercury Digestion 02/15/12 D SW7471

Completed SPLP Digestion Mercury 02/15/12 D E1312/SW7470

Completed SPLP Extraction for Metals 02/14/12 D EPA 1312

Completed Field Extraction 02/13/12 JM SW5035

TPH by GC (Extractable Products)ND Ext. Petroleum HC 11 02/15/12 J/P CT ETPH/8015mg/Kg

Page 1 of 103 Ver 1

GP-1 2-4 FT

Phoenix I.D.: BB43180

Parameter Result RL Units Date By ReferenceTime

Client ID:BRADLEY AIRPORT SEWERProject ID:

ND Identification 02/15/12 J/P CT ETPH/8015mg/Kg

QA/QC Surrogates68 % n-Pentacosane 02/15/12 J/P 50 - 150 %%

VolatilesND 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2.5 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND 1,1-Dichloroethane 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND 1,1-Dichloroethene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND 1,1-Dichloropropene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND 1,2-Dichloroethane 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND 1,2-Dichloropropane 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND 1,3-Dichloropropane 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND 2,2-Dichloropropane 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND 2-Chlorotoluene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND 2-Hexanone 21 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND 2-Isopropyltoluene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND 4-Chlorotoluene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND 4-Methyl-2-pentanone 21 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Acetone 83 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Acrylonitrile 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Benzene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Bromobenzene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Bromochloromethane 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Bromodichloromethane 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Bromoform 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Bromomethane 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Carbon Disulfide 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Carbon tetrachloride 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Chlorobenzene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Chloroethane 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Chloroform 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Chloromethane 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Dibromochloromethane 2.5 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Dibromoethane 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Dibromomethane 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Dichlorodifluoromethane 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Ethylbenzene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/Kg

Page 2 of 103 Ver 1

GP-1 2-4 FT




ND Hexachlorobutadiene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Isopropylbenzene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND m&p-Xylene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Methyl Ethyl Ketone 25 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) 8.3 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Methylene chloride 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Naphthalene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND n-Butylbenzene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND n-Propylbenzene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND o-Xylene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND p-Isopropyltoluene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND sec-Butylbenzene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Styrene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND tert-Butylbenzene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Tetrachloroethene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Tetrahydrofuran (THF) 8.3 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Toluene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Total Xylenes 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene 8.3 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Trichloroethene 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Trichlorofluoromethane 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Trichlorotrifluoroethane 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Vinyl chloride 4.1 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/Kg

QA/QC Surrogates99 % 1,2-dichlorobenzene-d4 02/15/12 H/J 70 - 130 %%

86 % Bromofluorobenzene 02/15/12 H/J 70 - 130 %%

99 % Dibromofluoromethane 02/15/12 H/J 70 - 130 %%

99 % Toluene-d8 02/15/12 H/J 70 - 130 %%

SemivolatilesND 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 2,4-Dichlorophenol 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 2,4-Dimethylphenol 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 2,4-Dinitrophenol 580 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 2-Chloronaphthalene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 2-Chlorophenol 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 2-Methylnaphthalene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 2-Methylphenol (o-cresol) 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 2-Nitroaniline 580 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 2-Nitrophenol 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 3&4-Methylphenol (m&p-cresol) 360 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/Kg

Page 3 of 103 Ver 1

GP-1 2-4 FT




ND 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 3-Nitroaniline 580 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 1000 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 360 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 4-Chloroaniline 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 4-Nitroaniline 580 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 4-Nitrophenol 1000 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Acenaphthene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Acenaphthylene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Acetophenone 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Aniline 1000 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Anthracene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Azobenzene 360 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Benz(a)anthracene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Benzidine 430 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Benzo(a)pyrene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Benzo(b)fluoranthene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Benzo(ghi)perylene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Benzo(k)fluoranthene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Benzoic acid 1000 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Benzyl butyl phthalate 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 360 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Carbazole 540 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Chrysene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Dibenzofuran 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Diethyl phthalate 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Dimethylphthalate 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Di-n-butylphthalate 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Di-n-octylphthalate 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Fluoranthene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Fluorene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Hexachlorobenzene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Hexachlorobutadiene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Hexachloroethane 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Isophorone 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Naphthalene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Nitrobenzene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND N-Nitrosodimethylamine 360 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 360 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Pentachloronitrobenzene 360 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Pentachlorophenol 360 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/Kg

Page 4 of 103 Ver 1

GP-1 2-4 FT




ND Phenanthrene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Phenol 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Pyrene 250 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Pyridine 360 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/Kg

QA/QC Surrogates106 % 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 02/15/12 KCA 15 - 130 %%

88 % 2-Fluorobiphenyl 02/15/12 KCA 15 - 130 %%

89 % 2-Fluorophenol 02/15/12 KCA 15 - 130 %%

90 % Nitrobenzene-d5 02/15/12 KCA 15 - 130 %%

88 % Phenol-d5 02/15/12 KCA 15 - 130 %%

84 % Terphenyl-d14 02/15/12 KCA 15 - 130 %%

Comments:

ND=Not detected BDL=Below Detection Level RL=Reporting Level

Phyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director

If there are any questions regarding this data, please call Phoenix Client Services at extension 200.

February 21, 2012

This report must not be reproduced except in full as defined by the attached chain of custody.

Page 5 of 103 Ver 1


Matrix:

Location Code:

Rush Request:

P.O.#:


Analyzed by:

SOIL

MAGU-DAS

72 Hour

165-416

02/13/12

SW

see "By" below

Laboratory Data

GP-1 10-12 FT

Phoenix ID: BB43181

02/14/12

14:09

14:02




Time

Date Time



SDG ID: GBB43180

Client ID:


< 0.34 Silver 0.34 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 0.67 Arsenic 0.67 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg15.7 Barium 0.34 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 0.34 Cadmium 0.34 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg6.42 Chromium 0.34 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 0.06 Mercury 0.06 02/15/12 RS SW-7471mg/Kg3.85 Lead 0.34 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 1.3 Selenium 1.3 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 0.010 SPLP Silver 0.010 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.004 SPLP Arsenic 0.004 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.010 SPLP Barium 0.010 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.005 SPLP Cadmium 0.005 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.010 SPLP Chromium 0.010 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.0004 SPLP Mercury 0.0004 02/15/12 RS 1312/SW7471mg/L< 0.010 SPLP Lead 0.010 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.020 SPLP Selenium 0.020 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/LCompleted Total Metals Digest 02/14/12 AG SW846 - 3050









Page 6 of 103 Ver 1

GP-1 10-12 FT







Page 7 of 103 Ver 1

GP-1 10-12 FT








98 % Toluene-d8 02/15/12 H/J 70 - 130 %%


Page 8 of 103 Ver 1

GP-1 10-12 FT





Page 9 of 103 Ver 1

GP-1 10-12 FT









90 % Phenol-d5 02/15/12 KCA 15 - 130 %%

87 % Terphenyl-d14 02/15/12 KCA 15 - 130 %%

Comments:




February 21, 2012


Page 10 of 103 Ver 1


Matrix:

Location Code:

Rush Request:

P.O.#:


Analyzed by:

SOIL

MAGU-DAS

72 Hour

165-416

02/13/12

SW

see "By" below

Laboratory Data

GP-2 2-4 FT

Phoenix ID: BB43182

02/14/12

13:38

14:02




Time

Date Time



SDG ID: GBB43180

Client ID:


< 0.34 Silver 0.34 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 0.68 Arsenic 0.68 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg33.7 Barium 0.34 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 0.34 Cadmium 0.34 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg10.1 Chromium 0.34 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 0.07 Mercury 0.07 02/15/12 RS SW-7471mg/Kg10.3 Lead 0.34 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 1.4 Selenium 1.4 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 0.010 SPLP Silver 0.010 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L0.005 SPLP Arsenic 0.004 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L0.073 SPLP Barium 0.010 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.005 SPLP Cadmium 0.005 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L0.012 SPLP Chromium 0.010 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.0004 SPLP Mercury 0.0004 02/15/12 RS 1312/SW7471mg/L0.022 SPLP Lead 0.010 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.020 SPLP Selenium 0.020 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/LCompleted Total Metals Digest 02/14/12 AG SW846 - 3050










GP-2 2-4 FT








GP-2 2-4 FT




ND Hexachlorobutadiene 4.7 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/Kg6.4 Isopropylbenzene 4.7 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND m&p-Xylene 4.7 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Methyl Ethyl Ketone 28 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) 9.3 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Methylene chloride 4.7 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Naphthalene 4.7 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND n-Butylbenzene 4.7 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND n-Propylbenzene 4.7 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND o-Xylene 4.7 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND p-Isopropyltoluene 4.7 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND sec-Butylbenzene 4.7 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Styrene 4.7 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND tert-Butylbenzene 4.7 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Tetrachloroethene 4.7 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Tetrahydrofuran (THF) 9.3 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Toluene 4.7 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Total Xylenes 4.7 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 4.7 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 4.7 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene 9.3 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Trichloroethene 4.7 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Trichlorofluoromethane 4.7 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Trichlorotrifluoroethane 4.7 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Vinyl chloride 4.7 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/Kg




98 % Toluene-d8 02/15/12 H/J 70 - 130 %%



GP-2 2-4 FT






GP-2 2-4 FT









92 % Phenol-d5 02/15/12 KCA 15 - 130 %%

85 % Terphenyl-d14 02/15/12 KCA 15 - 130 %%

Comments:




February 21, 2012




Matrix:

Location Code:

Rush Request:

P.O.#:


Analyzed by:

SOIL

MAGU-DAS

72 Hour

165-416

02/13/12

SW

see "By" below

Laboratory Data

GP-2 10-12 FT

Phoenix ID: BB43183

02/14/12

13:42

14:02




Time

Date Time



SDG ID: GBB43180

Client ID:












GP-2 10-12 FT








GP-2 10-12 FT




ND Hexachlorobutadiene 5.3 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Isopropylbenzene 5.3 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND m&p-Xylene 5.3 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Methyl Ethyl Ketone 32 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) 11 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Methylene chloride 5.3 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Naphthalene 5.3 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND n-Butylbenzene 5.3 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND n-Propylbenzene 5.3 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND o-Xylene 5.3 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND p-Isopropyltoluene 5.3 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND sec-Butylbenzene 5.3 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Styrene 5.3 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND tert-Butylbenzene 5.3 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Tetrachloroethene 5.3 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Tetrahydrofuran (THF) 11 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Toluene 5.3 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Total Xylenes 5.3 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.3 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.3 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene 11 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Trichloroethene 5.3 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Trichlorofluoromethane 5.3 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Trichlorotrifluoroethane 5.3 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Vinyl chloride 5.3 02/15/12 H/J SW8260ug/Kg




94 % Toluene-d8 02/15/12 H/J 70 - 130 %%

SemivolatilesND 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 2,4-Dichlorophenol 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 2,4-Dimethylphenol 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 2,4-Dinitrophenol 560 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 2-Chloronaphthalene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 2-Chlorophenol 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 2-Methylnaphthalene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 2-Methylphenol (o-cresol) 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 2-Nitroaniline 560 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 2-Nitrophenol 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 3&4-Methylphenol (m&p-cresol) 350 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/Kg


GP-2 10-12 FT




ND 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 3-Nitroaniline 560 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 1000 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 350 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 4-Chloroaniline 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 4-Nitroaniline 560 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 4-Nitrophenol 1000 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Acenaphthene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Acenaphthylene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Acetophenone 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Aniline 1000 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Anthracene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Azobenzene 350 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Benz(a)anthracene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Benzidine 420 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Benzo(a)pyrene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Benzo(b)fluoranthene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Benzo(ghi)perylene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Benzo(k)fluoranthene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Benzoic acid 1000 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Benzyl butyl phthalate 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 350 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Carbazole 520 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Chrysene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Dibenzofuran 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Diethyl phthalate 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Dimethylphthalate 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Di-n-butylphthalate 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Di-n-octylphthalate 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Fluoranthene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Fluorene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Hexachlorobenzene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Hexachlorobutadiene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Hexachloroethane 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Isophorone 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Naphthalene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Nitrobenzene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND N-Nitrosodimethylamine 350 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 350 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Pentachloronitrobenzene 350 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Pentachlorophenol 350 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/Kg


GP-2 10-12 FT




ND Phenanthrene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Phenol 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Pyrene 240 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Pyridine 350 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/Kg

QA/QC Surrogates80 % 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%

89 % 2-Fluorobiphenyl 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%

78 % 2-Fluorophenol 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%

72 % Nitrobenzene-d5 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%

73 % Phenol-d5 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%

136 % Terphenyl-d14 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %% 3

Comments:


* The surrogate failed method criteria due to sample matrix interference for the semivolatile analysis. The other surrogates associated with this sample were within QA/QC criteria. No further action was necessary.



February 21, 2012

3 = This parameter exceeds laboratory specified limits.




Matrix:

Location Code:

Rush Request:

P.O.#:


Analyzed by:

SOIL

MAGU-DAS

72 Hour

165-416

02/13/12

SW

see "By" below

Laboratory Data

GP-3 2-4 FT

Phoenix ID: BB43184

02/14/12

13:06

14:02




Time

Date Time



SDG ID: GBB43180

Client ID:


< 0.37 Silver 0.37 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 0.74 Arsenic 0.74 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg22.7 Barium 0.37 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 0.37 Cadmium 0.37 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg7.33 Chromium 0.37 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 0.09 Mercury 0.09 02/15/12 RS SW-7471mg/Kg5.05 Lead 0.37 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 1.5 Selenium 1.5 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 0.010 SPLP Silver 0.010 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.004 SPLP Arsenic 0.004 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L0.013 SPLP Barium 0.010 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.005 SPLP Cadmium 0.005 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.010 SPLP Chromium 0.010 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.0004 SPLP Mercury 0.0004 02/15/12 RS 1312/SW7471mg/L< 0.010 SPLP Lead 0.010 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.020 SPLP Selenium 0.020 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/LCompleted Total Metals Digest 02/14/12 AG SW846 - 3050










GP-3 2-4 FT






VolatilesND 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2.1 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND 1,1-Dichloroethane 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND 1,1-Dichloroethene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND 1,1-Dichloropropene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND 1,2-Dichloroethane 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND 1,2-Dichloropropane 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND 1,3-Dichloropropane 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND 2,2-Dichloropropane 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND 2-Chlorotoluene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND 2-Hexanone 17 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND 2-Isopropyltoluene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND 4-Chlorotoluene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND 4-Methyl-2-pentanone 17 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Acetone 70 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Acrylonitrile 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Benzene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Bromobenzene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Bromochloromethane 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Bromodichloromethane 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Bromoform 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Bromomethane 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Carbon Disulfide 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Carbon tetrachloride 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Chlorobenzene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Chloroethane 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Chloroform 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Chloromethane 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Dibromochloromethane 2.1 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Dibromoethane 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Dibromomethane 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Dichlorodifluoromethane 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Ethylbenzene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/Kg


GP-3 2-4 FT




ND Hexachlorobutadiene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Isopropylbenzene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND m&p-Xylene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Methyl Ethyl Ketone 21 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) 7.0 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Methylene chloride 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Naphthalene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND n-Butylbenzene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND n-Propylbenzene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND o-Xylene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND p-Isopropyltoluene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND sec-Butylbenzene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Styrene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND tert-Butylbenzene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Tetrachloroethene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Tetrahydrofuran (THF) 7.0 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Toluene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Total Xylenes 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene 7.0 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Trichloroethene 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Trichlorofluoromethane 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Trichlorotrifluoroethane 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Vinyl chloride 3.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/Kg

QA/QC Surrogates99 % 1,2-dichlorobenzene-d4 02/17/12 HM 70 - 130 %%

94 % Bromofluorobenzene 02/17/12 HM 70 - 130 %%

94 % Dibromofluoromethane 02/17/12 HM 70 - 130 %%

96 % Toluene-d8 02/17/12 HM 70 - 130 %%



GP-3 2-4 FT






GP-3 2-4 FT







80 % 2-Fluorophenol 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%


74 % Phenol-d5 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%

148 % Terphenyl-d14 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %% 3

Comments:





February 21, 2012





Matrix:

Location Code:

Rush Request:

P.O.#:


Analyzed by:

SOIL

MAGU-DAS

72 Hour

165-416

02/13/12

SW

see "By" below

Laboratory Data

GP-3 10-12 FT

Phoenix ID: BB43185

02/14/12

13:08

14:02




Time

Date Time



SDG ID: GBB43180

Client ID:












GP-3 10-12 FT








GP-3 10-12 FT




ND Hexachlorobutadiene 5.3 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Isopropylbenzene 5.3 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND m&p-Xylene 5.3 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Methyl Ethyl Ketone 32 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) 11 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Methylene chloride 5.3 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Naphthalene 5.3 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND n-Butylbenzene 5.3 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND n-Propylbenzene 5.3 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND o-Xylene 5.3 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND p-Isopropyltoluene 5.3 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND sec-Butylbenzene 5.3 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Styrene 5.3 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND tert-Butylbenzene 5.3 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Tetrachloroethene 5.3 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Tetrahydrofuran (THF) 11 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Toluene 5.3 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Total Xylenes 5.3 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.3 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.3 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene 11 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Trichloroethene 5.3 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Trichlorofluoromethane 5.3 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Trichlorotrifluoroethane 5.3 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Vinyl chloride 5.3 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/Kg




100 % Toluene-d8 02/17/12 HM 70 - 130 %%



GP-3 10-12 FT






GP-3 10-12 FT







80 % 2-Fluorophenol 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%


73 % Phenol-d5 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%

133 % Terphenyl-d14 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %% 3

Comments:





February 21, 2012





Matrix:

Location Code:

Rush Request:

P.O.#:


Analyzed by:

SOIL

MAGU-DAS

72 Hour

165-416

02/13/12

SW

see "By" below

Laboratory Data

GP-4 2-4 FT

Phoenix ID: BB43186

02/14/12

12:34

14:02




Time

Date Time



SDG ID: GBB43180

Client ID:












GP-4 2-4 FT








GP-4 2-4 FT








97 % Toluene-d8 02/15/12 H/J 70 - 130 %%



GP-4 2-4 FT






GP-4 2-4 FT







81 % 2-Fluorophenol 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%


83 % Phenol-d5 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%

80 % Terphenyl-d14 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%

Comments:




February 21, 2012




Matrix:

Location Code:

Rush Request:

P.O.#:


Analyzed by:

SOIL

MAGU-DAS

72 Hour

165-416

02/13/12

SW

see "By" below

Laboratory Data

GP-4 10-12 FT

Phoenix ID: BB43187

02/14/12

12:38

14:02




Time

Date Time



SDG ID: GBB43180

Client ID:












GP-4 10-12 FT








GP-4 10-12 FT




ND Hexachlorobutadiene 4.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Isopropylbenzene 4.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND m&p-Xylene 4.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Methyl Ethyl Ketone 27 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) 9.0 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Methylene chloride 4.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Naphthalene 4.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND n-Butylbenzene 4.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND n-Propylbenzene 4.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND o-Xylene 4.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND p-Isopropyltoluene 4.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND sec-Butylbenzene 4.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Styrene 4.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND tert-Butylbenzene 4.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Tetrachloroethene 4.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Tetrahydrofuran (THF) 9.0 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Toluene 4.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Total Xylenes 4.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 4.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 4.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene 9.0 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Trichloroethene 4.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Trichlorofluoromethane 4.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Trichlorotrifluoroethane 4.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/KgND Vinyl chloride 4.5 02/17/12 HM SW8260ug/Kg




96 % Toluene-d8 02/17/12 HM 70 - 130 %%



GP-4 10-12 FT






GP-4 10-12 FT







82 % 2-Fluorophenol 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%


77 % Phenol-d5 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%

144 % Terphenyl-d14 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %% 3

Comments:





February 21, 2012





Matrix:

Location Code:

Rush Request:

P.O.#:


Analyzed by:

SOIL

MAGU-DAS

72 Hour

165-416

02/13/12

SW

see "By" below

Laboratory Data

GP-5 2-4 FT

Phoenix ID: BB43188

02/14/12

12:08

14:02




Time

Date Time



SDG ID: GBB43180

Client ID:












GP-5 2-4 FT








GP-5 2-4 FT




ND Hexachlorobutadiene 5.4 02/17/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Isopropylbenzene 5.4 02/17/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND m&p-Xylene 5.4 02/17/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Methyl Ethyl Ketone 32 02/17/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) 11 02/17/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Methylene chloride 16 02/17/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Naphthalene 5.4 02/17/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND n-Butylbenzene 5.4 02/17/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND n-Propylbenzene 5.4 02/17/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND o-Xylene 5.4 02/17/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND p-Isopropyltoluene 5.4 02/17/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND sec-Butylbenzene 5.4 02/17/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Styrene 5.4 02/17/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND tert-Butylbenzene 5.4 02/17/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Tetrachloroethene 5.4 02/17/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Tetrahydrofuran (THF) 11 02/17/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Toluene 5.4 02/17/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Total Xylenes 5.4 02/17/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 5.4 02/17/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 5.4 02/17/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene 11 02/17/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Trichloroethene 5.4 02/17/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Trichlorofluoromethane 5.4 02/17/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Trichlorotrifluoroethane 5.4 02/17/12 H/J SW8260ug/KgND Vinyl chloride 5.4 02/17/12 H/J SW8260ug/Kg




98 % Toluene-d8 02/17/12 H/J 70 - 130 %%



GP-5 2-4 FT






GP-5 2-4 FT







81 % 2-Fluorophenol 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%


82 % Phenol-d5 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%

75 % Terphenyl-d14 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%

Comments:




February 21, 2012




Matrix:

Location Code:

Rush Request:

P.O.#:


Analyzed by:

SOIL

MAGU-DAS

72 Hour

165-416

02/13/12

SW

see "By" below

Laboratory Data

GP-5 10-12 FT

Phoenix ID: BB43189

02/14/12

12:11

14:02




Time

Date Time



SDG ID: GBB43180

Client ID:


< 0.38 Silver 0.38 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 0.76 Arsenic 0.76 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg24.2 Barium 0.38 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 0.38 Cadmium 0.38 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg7.87 Chromium 0.38 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 0.08 Mercury 0.08 02/15/12 RS SW-7471mg/Kg8.37 Lead 0.38 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 1.5 Selenium 1.5 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 0.010 SPLP Silver 0.010 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.004 SPLP Arsenic 0.004 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L0.019 SPLP Barium 0.010 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.005 SPLP Cadmium 0.005 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L0.010 SPLP Chromium 0.010 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.0004 SPLP Mercury 0.0004 02/15/12 RS 1312/SW7471mg/L< 0.010 SPLP Lead 0.010 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.020 SPLP Selenium 0.020 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/LCompleted Total Metals Digest 02/14/12 AG SW846 - 3050










GP-5 10-12 FT








GP-5 10-12 FT








95 % Toluene-d8 02/17/12 H/J 70 - 130 %%



GP-5 10-12 FT




ND 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 3-Nitroaniline 610 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 1100 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 380 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 4-Chloroaniline 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 4-Nitroaniline 610 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND 4-Nitrophenol 1100 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Acenaphthene 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Acenaphthylene 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Acetophenone 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Aniline 1100 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Anthracene 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Azobenzene 380 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Benz(a)anthracene 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Benzidine 460 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Benzo(a)pyrene 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Benzo(b)fluoranthene 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Benzo(ghi)perylene 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Benzo(k)fluoranthene 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Benzoic acid 1100 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Benzyl butyl phthalate 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 380 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Carbazole 570 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Chrysene 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Dibenzofuran 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Diethyl phthalate 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Dimethylphthalate 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Di-n-butylphthalate 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Di-n-octylphthalate 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/Kg300 Fluoranthene 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Fluorene 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Hexachlorobenzene 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Hexachlorobutadiene 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Hexachloroethane 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Isophorone 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Naphthalene 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Nitrobenzene 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND N-Nitrosodimethylamine 380 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 380 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Pentachloronitrobenzene 380 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Pentachlorophenol 380 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/Kg


GP-5 10-12 FT




ND Phenanthrene 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Phenol 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/Kg310 Pyrene 270 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/KgND Pyridine 380 02/15/12 DD SW 8270ug/Kg



73 % 2-Fluorophenol 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%


70 % Phenol-d5 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%

131 % Terphenyl-d14 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %% 3

Comments:





February 21, 2012





Matrix:

Location Code:

Rush Request:

P.O.#:


Analyzed by:

SOIL

MAGU-DAS

72 Hour

165-416

02/13/12

SW

see "By" below

Laboratory Data

GP-6 2-4 FT

Phoenix ID: BB43190

02/14/12

11:40

14:02




Time

Date Time



SDG ID: GBB43180

Client ID:












GP-6 2-4 FT








GP-6 2-4 FT








101 % Toluene-d8 02/16/12 H/J 70 - 130 %%



GP-6 2-4 FT






GP-6 2-4 FT







75 % 2-Fluorophenol 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%


71 % Phenol-d5 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%

129 % Terphenyl-d14 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%

Comments:




February 21, 2012




Matrix:

Location Code:

Rush Request:

P.O.#:


Analyzed by:

SOIL

MAGU-DAS

72 Hour

165-416

02/13/12

SW

see "By" below

Laboratory Data

GP-7 2-4 FT

Phoenix ID: BB43191

02/14/12

11:18

14:02




Time

Date Time



SDG ID: GBB43180

Client ID:












GP-7 2-4 FT








GP-7 2-4 FT








99 % Toluene-d8 02/15/12 H/J 70 - 130 %%



GP-7 2-4 FT






GP-7 2-4 FT







83 % 2-Fluorophenol 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%


79 % Phenol-d5 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%

135 % Terphenyl-d14 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %% 3

Comments:





February 21, 2012





Matrix:

Location Code:

Rush Request:

P.O.#:


Analyzed by:

SOIL

MAGU-DAS

72 Hour

165-416

02/13/12

SW

see "By" below

Laboratory Data

GP-8 2-4 FT

Phoenix ID: BB43192

02/14/12

10:58

14:02




Time

Date Time



SDG ID: GBB43180

Client ID:












GP-8 2-4 FT








GP-8 2-4 FT








96 % Toluene-d8 02/15/12 H/J 70 - 130 %%



GP-8 2-4 FT






GP-8 2-4 FT









84 % Phenol-d5 02/14/12 KCA 15 - 130 %%

88 % Terphenyl-d14 02/14/12 KCA 15 - 130 %%

Comments:




February 21, 2012




Matrix:

Location Code:

Rush Request:

P.O.#:


Analyzed by:

SOIL

MAGU-DAS

72 Hour

165-416

02/13/12

SW

see "By" below

Laboratory Data

GP-9 2-4 FT

Phoenix ID: BB43193

02/14/12

10:31

14:02




Time

Date Time



SDG ID: GBB43180

Client ID:












GP-9 2-4 FT








GP-9 2-4 FT








102 % Toluene-d8 02/15/12 H/J 70 - 130 %%



GP-9 2-4 FT






GP-9 2-4 FT









79 % Phenol-d5 02/14/12 KCA 15 - 130 %%

84 % Terphenyl-d14 02/14/12 KCA 15 - 130 %%

Comments:




February 21, 2012




Matrix:

Location Code:

Rush Request:

P.O.#:


Analyzed by:

SOIL

MAGU-DAS

72 Hour

165-416

02/13/12

SW

see "By" below

Laboratory Data

GP-10 2-4 FT

Phoenix ID: BB43194

02/14/12

10:02

14:02




Time

Date Time



SDG ID: GBB43180

Client ID:


0.37 Silver 0.34 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 0.69 Arsenic 0.69 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg16.8 Barium 0.34 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 0.34 Cadmium 0.34 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg8.17 Chromium 0.34 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 0.06 Mercury 0.06 02/15/12 RS SW-7471mg/Kg6.90 Lead 0.34 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 1.4 Selenium 1.4 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 0.010 SPLP Silver 0.010 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.004 SPLP Arsenic 0.004 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L0.017 SPLP Barium 0.010 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.005 SPLP Cadmium 0.005 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.010 SPLP Chromium 0.010 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.0004 SPLP Mercury 0.0004 02/15/12 RS 1312/SW7471mg/L< 0.010 SPLP Lead 0.010 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.020 SPLP Selenium 0.020 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/LCompleted Total Metals Digest 02/14/12 AG SW846 - 3050










GP-10 2-4 FT








GP-10 2-4 FT








93 % Toluene-d8 02/15/12 H/J 70 - 130 %%



GP-10 2-4 FT






GP-10 2-4 FT









86 % Phenol-d5 02/14/12 KCA 15 - 130 %%

86 % Terphenyl-d14 02/14/12 KCA 15 - 130 %%

Comments:




February 21, 2012




Matrix:

Location Code:

Rush Request:

P.O.#:


Analyzed by:

SOIL

MAGU-DAS

72 Hour

165-416

02/13/12

SW

see "By" below

Laboratory Data

GP-11 2-4 FT

Phoenix ID: BB43195

02/14/12

9:37

14:02




Time

Date Time



SDG ID: GBB43180

Client ID:












GP-11 2-4 FT








GP-11 2-4 FT








100 % Toluene-d8 02/15/12 H/J 70 - 130 %%



GP-11 2-4 FT






GP-11 2-4 FT









84 % Phenol-d5 02/15/12 KCA 15 - 130 %%

78 % Terphenyl-d14 02/15/12 KCA 15 - 130 %%

Comments:




February 21, 2012




Matrix:

Location Code:

Rush Request:

P.O.#:


Analyzed by:

SOIL

MAGU-DAS

72 Hour

165-416

02/13/12

SW

see "By" below

Laboratory Data

GP-12 2-4 FT

Phoenix ID: BB43196

02/14/12

9:06

14:02




Time

Date Time



SDG ID: GBB43180

Client ID:












GP-12 2-4 FT








GP-12 2-4 FT








107 % Toluene-d8 02/15/12 H/J 70 - 130 %%



GP-12 2-4 FT






GP-12 2-4 FT









78 % Phenol-d5 02/15/12 KCA 15 - 130 %%

89 % Terphenyl-d14 02/15/12 KCA 15 - 130 %%

Comments:




February 21, 2012




Matrix:

Location Code:

Rush Request:

P.O.#:


Analyzed by:

SOIL

MAGU-DAS

72 Hour

165-416

02/13/12

SW

see "By" below

Laboratory Data

GP-13 2-4 FT

Phoenix ID: BB43197

02/14/12

8:07

14:02




Time

Date Time



SDG ID: GBB43180

Client ID:


< 0.38 Silver 0.38 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 0.77 Arsenic 0.77 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg30.8 Barium 0.38 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 0.38 Cadmium 0.38 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg9.79 Chromium 0.38 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 0.09 Mercury 0.09 02/15/12 RS SW-7471mg/Kg31.8 Lead 0.38 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 1.5 Selenium 1.5 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/Kg< 0.010 SPLP Silver 0.010 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.004 SPLP Arsenic 0.004 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L0.013 SPLP Barium 0.010 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.005 SPLP Cadmium 0.005 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.010 SPLP Chromium 0.010 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.0004 SPLP Mercury 0.0004 02/15/12 RS 1312/SW7471mg/L0.018 SPLP Lead 0.010 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/L< 0.020 SPLP Selenium 0.020 02/15/12 EK E1312/SW6010mg/LCompleted Total Metals Digest 02/14/12 AG SW846 - 3050










GP-13 2-4 FT








GP-13 2-4 FT








99 % Toluene-d8 02/17/12 H/J 70 - 130 %%



GP-13 2-4 FT




ND 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 3-Nitroaniline 590 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 1100 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 370 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 4-Chloroaniline 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 4-Nitroaniline 590 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND 4-Nitrophenol 1100 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Acenaphthene 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Acenaphthylene 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Acetophenone 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Aniline 1100 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Anthracene 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Azobenzene 370 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Benz(a)anthracene 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Benzidine 450 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Benzo(a)pyrene 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/Kg330 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Benzo(ghi)perylene 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Benzo(k)fluoranthene 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Benzoic acid 1100 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Benzyl butyl phthalate 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 370 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Carbazole 560 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Chrysene 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Dibenzofuran 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Diethyl phthalate 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Dimethylphthalate 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Di-n-butylphthalate 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Di-n-octylphthalate 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/Kg410 Fluoranthene 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Fluorene 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Hexachlorobenzene 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Hexachlorobutadiene 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Hexachloroethane 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Isophorone 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Naphthalene 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Nitrobenzene 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND N-Nitrosodimethylamine 370 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 370 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Pentachloronitrobenzene 370 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Pentachlorophenol 370 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/Kg


GP-13 2-4 FT




310 Phenanthrene 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Phenol 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/Kg410 Pyrene 260 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/KgND Pyridine 370 02/15/12 KCA SW 8270ug/Kg





89 % Phenol-d5 02/15/12 KCA 15 - 130 %%

76 % Terphenyl-d14 02/15/12 KCA 15 - 130 %%

Comments:




February 21, 2012




Matrix:

Location Code:

Rush Request:

P.O.#:


Analyzed by:

GROUND WATER

MAGU-DAS

72 Hour

165-416

02/13/12

SW

see "By" below

Laboratory Data

GP-13 GW

Phoenix ID: BB43198

02/14/12

8:40

14:02




Time

Date Time



SDG ID: GBB43180

Client ID:


< 0.001 Silver 0.001 02/15/12 LK 6010/200.7mg/L0.019 Arsenic 0.004 02/15/12 LK 6010/200.7mg/L0.148 Barium 0.002 02/15/12 LK 6010/200.7mg/L< 0.001 Cadmium 0.001 02/15/12 LK 6010/200.7mg/L0.002 Chromium 0.001 02/15/12 LK 6010/200.7mg/L< 0.001 Silver (Dissolved) 0.001 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/L0.010 Arsenic (Dissolved) 0.004 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/L0.113 Barium (Dissolved) 0.002 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/L< 0.001 Cadmium (Dissolved) 0.001 02/17/12 LK 6010/200.7mg/L< 0.001 Chromium (Dissolved) 0.001 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/L< 0.0002 Mercury (Dissolved) 0.0002 02/15/12 RS 7470/E245.1mg/L< 0.002 Lead (Dissolved) 0.002 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/L< 0.011 Selenium (Dissolved) 0.011 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/L< 0.0002 Mercury 0.0002 02/15/12 RS 7470/E245.1mg/L< 0.002 Lead 0.002 02/15/12 LK 6010/200.7mg/L< 0.010 Selenium 0.010 02/15/12 LK 6010/200.7mg/LCompleted Dissolved Metals Preparation 02/14/12 AG SW846-3005

Completed Total Metals Digestion 02/14/12 AG

Completed Extraction of CT ETPH 02/14/12 F/K 3510/3520

Completed Dissolved Mercury Digestion 02/15/12 D SW7470

Completed Mercury Digestion 02/15/12 D 7471/245.1

Completed Semi-Volatile Extraction 02/14/12 F/K SW3520

TPH by GC (Extractable Products)ND Ext. Petroleum HC 0.070 02/15/12 JRB CTETPH/8015DROmg/LND Identification 02/15/12 JRB CTETPH/8015DROmg/L

QA/QC Surrogates75 % n-Pentacosane 02/15/12 JRB 50 - 150 %%


GP-13 GW




VolatilesND 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.50 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,1-Dichloroethane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,1-Dichloroethene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,1-Dichloropropene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.60 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,2-Dichloropropane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,3-Dichloropropane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 2,2-Dichloropropane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 2-Chlorotoluene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 2-Hexanone 5.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 2-Isopropyltoluene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 4-Chlorotoluene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 4-Methyl-2-pentanone 5.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Acetone 25 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Acrylonitrile 5.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Benzene 0.70 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Bromobenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Bromochloromethane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Bromodichloromethane 0.50 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Bromoform 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Bromomethane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Carbon Disulfide 5.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Carbon tetrachloride 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Chlorobenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Chloroethane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Chloroform 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Chloromethane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.50 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Dibromochloromethane 0.50 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Dibromoethane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Dibromomethane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Dichlorodifluoromethane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Ethylbenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Hexachlorobutadiene 0.40 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Isopropylbenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND m&p-Xylene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/L


GP-13 GW




ND Methyl ethyl ketone 5.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Methylene chloride 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Naphthalene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND n-Butylbenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND n-Propylbenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND o-Xylene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND p-Isopropyltoluene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND sec-Butylbenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Styrene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND tert-Butylbenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Tetrachloroethene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Tetrahydrofuran (THF) 5.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Toluene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Total Xylenes 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.50 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene 5.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Trichloroethene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Trichlorofluoromethane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Trichlorotrifluoroethane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Vinyl chloride 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/L

QA/QC Surrogates104 % 1,2-dichlorobenzene-d4 02/15/12 H/T 70 - 130 %%

95 % Bromofluorobenzene 02/15/12 H/T 70 - 130 %%

127 % Dibromofluoromethane 02/15/12 H/T 70 - 130 %%

103 % Toluene-d8 02/15/12 H/T 70 - 130 %%

SemivolatilesND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 10 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 10 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 2,4-Dichlorophenol 10 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 2,4-Dimethylphenol 10 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 2,4-Dinitrophenol 50 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 2-Chloronaphthalene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 2-Chlorophenol 10 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 2-Methylnaphthalene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 2-Methylphenol (o-cresol) 10 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 2-Nitroaniline 50 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 2-Nitrophenol 10 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 3&4-Methylphenol (m&p-cresol) 10 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 50 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 3-Nitroaniline 50 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 50 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/L


GP-13 GW




ND 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 20 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 4-Chloroaniline 20 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 4-Nitroaniline 20 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 4-Nitrophenol 50 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Acetophenone 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Aniline 10 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Anthracene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Azobenzene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Benzidine 50 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Benzoic acid 50 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Benzyl butyl phthalate 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Carbazole 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Dibenzofuran 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Diethyl phthalate 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Dimethylphthalate 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Di-n-butylphthalate 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Di-n-octylphthalate 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Fluoranthene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Fluorene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Hexachlorobutadiene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Isophorone 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Naphthalene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Nitrobenzene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND N-Nitrosodimethylamine 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Phenol 10 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Pyrene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Pyridine 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/L



35 % 2-Fluorophenol 02/17/12 DD 15 - 130 %%


53 % Phenol-d5 02/17/12 DD 15 - 130 %%

91 % Terphenyl-d14 02/17/12 DD 15 - 130 %%

SemivolatilesND 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 1.6 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/L0.08 Acenaphthene 0.050 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/L0.1 Acenaphthylene 0.050 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/L0.2 Benz(a)anthracene 0.040 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/L0.22 Benzo(a)pyrene 0.050 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/L0.33 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.050 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/LND Benzo(ghi)perylene 3.0 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/L0.11 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.050 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/L


GP-13 GW




ND Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 1.6 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/L0.23 Chrysene 0.050 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/L0.03 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.010 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/LND Hexachlorobenzene 0.060 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/LND Hexachloroethane 2.4 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/L0.12 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.050 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/LND Pentachloronitrobenzene 0.10 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/LND Pentachlorophenol 0.80 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/L0.72 Phenanthrene 0.050 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/L



35 % 2-Fluorophenol 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%


53 % Phenol-d5 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%

91 % Terphenyl-d14 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%

Comments:




February 21, 2012




Matrix:

Location Code:

Rush Request:

P.O.#:


Analyzed by:

WATER

MAGU-DAS

72 Hour

165-416

02/13/12

SW

see "By" below

Laboratory Data

FB-1

Phoenix ID: BB43199

02/14/12

16:35

14:02




Time

Date Time



SDG ID: GBB43180

Client ID:


< 0.001 Silver 0.001 02/15/12 LK 6010/200.7mg/L< 0.004 Arsenic 0.004 02/15/12 LK 6010/200.7mg/L< 0.002 Barium 0.002 02/15/12 LK 6010/200.7mg/L< 0.001 Cadmium 0.001 02/15/12 LK 6010/200.7mg/L< 0.001 Chromium 0.001 02/15/12 LK 6010/200.7mg/L< 0.001 Silver (Dissolved) 0.001 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/L< 0.004 Arsenic (Dissolved) 0.004 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/L< 0.002 Barium (Dissolved) 0.002 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/L< 0.001 Cadmium (Dissolved) 0.001 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/L< 0.001 Chromium (Dissolved) 0.001 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/L< 0.0002 Mercury (Dissolved) 0.0002 02/15/12 RS 7470/E245.1mg/L< 0.002 Lead (Dissolved) 0.002 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/L< 0.011 Selenium (Dissolved) 0.011 02/15/12 EK 6010/200.7mg/L< 0.0002 Mercury 0.0002 02/15/12 RS 7470/E245.1mg/L< 0.002 Lead 0.002 02/15/12 LK 6010/200.7mg/L< 0.010 Selenium 0.010 02/15/12 LK 6010/200.7mg/LCompleted Dissolved Metals Preparation 02/14/12 AG SW846-3005

Completed Total Metals Digestion 02/14/12 AG

Completed Extraction of CT ETPH 02/14/12 F/K 3510/3520

Completed Dissolved Mercury Digestion 02/15/12 D SW7470

Completed Mercury Digestion 02/15/12 D 7471/245.1

Completed Semi-Volatile Extraction 02/14/12 F/K SW3520

TPH by GC (Extractable Products)ND Ext. Petroleum HC 0.070 02/15/12 JRB CTETPH/8015DROmg/LND Identification 02/15/12 JRB CTETPH/8015DROmg/L

QA/QC Surrogates64 % n-Pentacosane 02/15/12 JRB 50 - 150 %%


FB-1




VolatilesND 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.50 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,1-Dichloroethane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,1-Dichloroethene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,1-Dichloropropene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.60 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,2-Dichloropropane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,3-Dichloropropane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 2,2-Dichloropropane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 2-Chlorotoluene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 2-Hexanone 5.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 2-Isopropyltoluene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 4-Chlorotoluene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND 4-Methyl-2-pentanone 5.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Acetone 25 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Acrylonitrile 5.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Benzene 0.70 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Bromobenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Bromochloromethane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Bromodichloromethane 0.50 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Bromoform 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Bromomethane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Carbon Disulfide 5.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Carbon tetrachloride 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Chlorobenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Chloroethane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Chloroform 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Chloromethane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.50 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Dibromochloromethane 0.50 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Dibromoethane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Dibromomethane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Dichlorodifluoromethane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Ethylbenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Hexachlorobutadiene 0.40 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Isopropylbenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND m&p-Xylene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/L


FB-1




ND Methyl ethyl ketone 5.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Methylene chloride 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Naphthalene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND n-Butylbenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND n-Propylbenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND o-Xylene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND p-Isopropyltoluene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND sec-Butylbenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Styrene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND tert-Butylbenzene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Tetrachloroethene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Tetrahydrofuran (THF) 5.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Toluene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Total Xylenes 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.50 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene 5.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Trichloroethene 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Trichlorofluoromethane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Trichlorotrifluoroethane 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/LND Vinyl chloride 1.0 02/15/12 H/T SW8260ug/L

QA/QC Surrogates105 % 1,2-dichlorobenzene-d4 02/15/12 H/T 70 - 130 %%

95 % Bromofluorobenzene 02/15/12 H/T 70 - 130 %%

114 % Dibromofluoromethane 02/15/12 H/T 70 - 130 %%

104 % Toluene-d8 02/15/12 H/T 70 - 130 %%

SemivolatilesND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 10 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 10 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 2,4-Dichlorophenol 10 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 2,4-Dimethylphenol 10 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 2,4-Dinitrophenol 50 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 2-Chloronaphthalene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 2-Chlorophenol 10 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 2-Methylnaphthalene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 2-Methylphenol (o-cresol) 10 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 2-Nitroaniline 50 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 2-Nitrophenol 10 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 3&4-Methylphenol (m&p-cresol) 10 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 50 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 3-Nitroaniline 50 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 50 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/L


FB-1




ND 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 20 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 4-Chloroaniline 20 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 4-Nitroaniline 20 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND 4-Nitrophenol 50 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Acetophenone 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Aniline 10 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Anthracene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Azobenzene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Benzidine 50 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Benzoic acid 50 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Benzyl butyl phthalate 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Carbazole 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Dibenzofuran 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Diethyl phthalate 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Dimethylphthalate 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Di-n-butylphthalate 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Di-n-octylphthalate 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Fluoranthene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Fluorene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Hexachlorobutadiene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Isophorone 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Naphthalene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Nitrobenzene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND N-Nitrosodimethylamine 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Phenol 10 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Pyrene 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/LND Pyridine 5.0 02/17/12 DD SW8270ug/L



72 % 2-Fluorophenol 02/17/12 DD 15 - 130 %%


74 % Phenol-d5 02/17/12 DD 15 - 130 %%

99 % Terphenyl-d14 02/17/12 DD 15 - 130 %%

SemivolatilesND 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 1.6 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/LND Acenaphthene 0.050 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/LND Acenaphthylene 0.050 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/LND Benz(a)anthracene 0.040 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/LND Benzo(a)pyrene 0.050 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/LND Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.050 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/LND Benzo(ghi)perylene 3.0 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/LND Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.050 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/L


FB-1




ND Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 1.6 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/LND Chrysene 0.050 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/LND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.010 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/LND Hexachlorobenzene 0.060 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/LND Hexachloroethane 2.4 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/LND Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.050 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/LND Pentachloronitrobenzene 0.10 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/LND Pentachlorophenol 0.80 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/LND Phenanthrene 0.050 02/15/12 DD SW8270 (SIM)ug/L



72 % 2-Fluorophenol 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%


74 % Phenol-d5 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%

99 % Terphenyl-d14 02/15/12 DD 15 - 130 %%

Comments:




February 21, 2012




Matrix:

Location Code:

Rush Request:

P.O.#:


Analyzed by:

WATER

MAGU-DAS

72 Hour

165-416

02/13/12

SW

see "By" below

Laboratory Data

TB-1

Phoenix ID: BB43200

02/14/12

0:00

14:02




Time

Date Time



SDG ID: GBB43180

Client ID:


VolatilesND 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.50 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND 1,1-Dichloroethane 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND 1,1-Dichloroethene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND 1,1-Dichloropropene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.60 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND 1,2-Dichloropropane 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND 1,3-Dichloropropane 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND 2,2-Dichloropropane 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND 2-Chlorotoluene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND 2-Hexanone 5.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND 2-Isopropyltoluene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND 4-Chlorotoluene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND 4-Methyl-2-pentanone 5.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Acetone 25 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/L


TB-1




ND Acrylonitrile 5.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Benzene 0.70 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Bromobenzene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Bromochloromethane 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Bromodichloromethane 0.50 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Bromoform 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Bromomethane 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Carbon Disulfide 5.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Carbon tetrachloride 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Chlorobenzene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Chloroethane 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Chloroform 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Chloromethane 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.50 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Dibromochloromethane 0.50 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Dibromoethane 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Dibromomethane 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Dichlorodifluoromethane 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Ethylbenzene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Hexachlorobutadiene 0.40 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Isopropylbenzene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND m&p-Xylene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Methyl ethyl ketone 5.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Methylene chloride 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Naphthalene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND n-Butylbenzene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND n-Propylbenzene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND o-Xylene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND p-Isopropyltoluene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND sec-Butylbenzene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Styrene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND tert-Butylbenzene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Tetrachloroethene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Tetrahydrofuran (THF) 5.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Toluene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Total Xylenes 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.50 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene 5.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Trichloroethene 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Trichlorofluoromethane 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Trichlorotrifluoroethane 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/LND Vinyl chloride 1.0 02/17/12 RM SW8260ug/L

QA/QC Surrogates103 % 1,2-dichlorobenzene-d4 02/17/12 RM 70 - 130 %%

89 % Bromofluorobenzene 02/17/12 RM 70 - 130 %%

93 % Dibromofluoromethane 02/17/12 RM 70 - 130 %%

94 % Toluene-d8 02/17/12 RM 70 - 130 %%


TB-1




Comments:


TRIP BLANK INCLUDED.



February 21, 2012



QA/QC Data

Parameter BlankMS%

MSD%

MSRPD

QA/QC ReportFebruary 21, 2012



SDG I.D.: GBB43180

LCS%

DupRPD

LCSD%

LCSRPD

%Rec

Limits

%RPDLimits

SampleResult

DupResult

QA/QC Batch 194002, QC Sample No: BB36635 (BB43180, BB43181, BB43182)

ICP Metals - SPLP Extraction98.3 107Arsenic BDL 8.5110NC 102 7.5 75 - 125 20<0.004 <0.004

100 107Barium BDL 6.81111.40 105 5.6 75 - 125 200.070 0.069

102 108Cadmium BDL 5.7111NC 106 4.6 75 - 125 20<0.005 <0.005

99.8 106Chromium BDL 6.0110NC 104 5.6 75 - 125 20<0.010 <0.010

101 107Lead BDL 5.8110NC 104 5.6 75 - 125 20<0.010 <0.010

96.5 106Selenium BDL 9.4108NC 101 6.7 75 - 125 20<0.020 <0.020

98.3 105Silver BDL 6.6109NC 103 5.7 75 - 125 20<0.010 <0.010

QA/QC Batch 194393, QC Sample No: BB42912 (BB43191, BB43192, BB43193, BB43194, BB43195, BB43196, BB43197)

ICP Metals - Soil95.3 95.0Arsenic BDL 0.31090.60 95.1 13.6 75 - 125 306.58 6.62

101 96.8Barium BDL 4.21134.30 97.7 14.5 75 - 125 3013.6 14.2

98.1 96.9Cadmium BDL 1.2113NC 105 7.3 75 - 125 30<0.43 <0.40

100 99.2Chromium BDL 0.811521.1 104 10.0 75 - 125 3015.2 12.3

99.0 96.8Lead BDL 2.21099.70 98.3 10.3 75 - 125 306.46 5.86

93.9 93.1Selenium BDL 0.9106NC 97.3 8.6 75 - 125 30<0.43 <1.6

97.1 96.4Silver BDL 0.7110NC 93.1 16.6 75 - 125 30<0.43 <0.40

QA/QC Batch 194330, QC Sample No: BB42990 (BB43198, BB43199)

ICP Metals - Aqueous103 101Arsenic BDL 2.093.1NC 99.8 6.9 75 - 125 20<0.004 <0.004

104 101Barium BDL 2.992.93.10 100 7.4 75 - 125 200.033 0.032

107 105Cadmium BDL 1.995.9NC 104 8.1 75 - 125 20<0.001 <0.001

105 102Chromium BDL 2.994.0NC 102 8.2 75 - 125 20<0.001 <0.001

105 103Lead BDL 1.994.9NC 101 6.2 75 - 125 20<0.002 <0.002

97.8 96.1Selenium BDL 1.888.8NC 94.8 6.5 75 - 125 20<0.010 <0.010

99.9 98.0Silver BDL 1.990.4NC 97.4 7.5 75 - 125 20<0.001 <0.001

QA/QC Batch 194430, QC Sample No: BB43147 (BB43180, BB43181, BB43182, BB43183, BB43184, BB43185, BB43186, BB43187, BB43188, BB43189, BB43190, BB43191, BB43192, BB43193, BB43194, BB43195, BB43196, BB43197)

64.8 70.7Mercury - Soil BDL 8.7100 86.1 14.9 m70 - 130 30<0.06

QA/QC Batch 194426, QC Sample No: BB43183 (BB43183, BB43184, BB43185, BB43186, BB43187, BB43188, BB43189, BB43190, BB43191, BB43192, BB43193, BB43194, BB43195, BB43196, BB43197)

ICP Metals - SPLP Extraction100 104Arsenic BDL 3.9101NC 101 0.0 75 - 125 20<0.004 <0.004

102 106Barium BDL 3.8102NC 100 2.0 75 - 125 20<0.010 <0.010

103 107Cadmium BDL 3.8104NC 103 1.0 75 - 125 20<0.005 <0.005

101 104Chromium BDL 2.9102NC 100 2.0 75 - 125 20<0.010 <0.010

102 105Lead BDL 2.9103NC 102 1.0 75 - 125 20<0.010 <0.010

99.7 103Selenium BDL 3.3100NC 101 1.0 75 - 125 20<0.020 <0.020

97.3 101Silver BDL 3.798.2NC 96.3 2.0 75 - 125 20<0.010 <0.010

Page 1 of 17

QA/QC Data

Parameter BlankMS%

MSD%

MSRPD

SDG I.D.: GBB43180

LCS%

DupRPD

LCSD%

LCSRPD

%Rec

Limits

%RPDLimits

SampleResult

DupResult

QA/QC Batch 194428, QC Sample No: BB43183 (BB43180, BB43181, BB43182, BB43183, BB43184, BB43185, BB43186, BB43187, BB43188, BB43189, BB43190, BB43191, BB43192, BB43193, BB43194, BB43195, BB43196, BB43197)

105 105Mercury - Water BDL 0.0109NC 109 0.0 70 - 130 20<0.0004 <0.0002

QA/QC Batch 194392, QC Sample No: BB43187 (BB43180, BB43181, BB43182, BB43183, BB43184, BB43185, BB43186, BB43187, BB43188, BB43189, BB43190)

ICP Metals - Soil103 97.9Arsenic BDL 5.198.8NC 104 5.1 75 - 125 30<0.64 <0.73

108 106Barium BDL 1.91062.30 112 5.5 75 - 125 3022.3 21.8

107 100Cadmium BDL 6.899.8NC 108 7.9 75 - 125 30<0.32 <0.37

106 101Chromium BDL 4.899.010.0 107 7.8 75 - 125 308.58 7.76

109 102Lead BDL 6.699.46.50 104 4.5 75 - 125 305.26 4.93

101 95.4Selenium BDL 5.782.5NC 87.2 5.5 75 - 125 30<1.3 <1.5

98.7 101Silver BDL 2.394.5NC 102 7.6 75 - 125 30<0.32 <0.37

QA/QC Batch 194404, QC Sample No: BB43198 (BB43199)

ICP Metals - Dissolved95.3 97.3Arsenic BDL 2.195.6NC 97.7 2.2 75 - 125 200.010 0.009

94.9 97.6Barium BDL 2.895.30.90 97.7 2.5 75 - 125 200.113 0.112

96.8 99.5Cadmium BDL 2.898.40 101 2.6 75 - 125 200.015 0.015

95.2 98.6Chromium BDL 3.596.1NC 98.8 2.8 75 - 125 20<0.001 <0.001

95.7 98.7Lead BDL 3.196.7NC 99.5 2.9 75 - 125 20<0.002 <0.002

90.7 92.1Selenium BDL 1.591.0NC 94.0 3.2 75 - 125 20<0.011 <0.011

75.9 77.9Silver BDL 2.691.4NC 93.7 2.5 75 - 125 20<0.001 <0.001

QA/QC Batch 194427, QC Sample No: BB43199 (BB43198, BB43199)114 110Mercury - Water BDL 3.6117NC 114 2.6 70 - 130 20<0.0002 <0.0002


ICP Metals - Dissolved103 101Arsenic BDL 2.0101NC 96.0 5.1 75 - 125 20<0.004 <0.004

101 98.2Barium BDL 2.81015.40 96.5 4.6 75 - 125 200.019 0.018

104 103Cadmium BDL 1.0104NC 97.4 6.6 75 - 125 20<0.001 <0.001

102 100Chromium BDL 2.0102NC 95.6 6.5 75 - 125 20<0.001 <0.001

102 100Lead BDL 2.0101NC 95.7 5.4 75 - 125 200.002 <0.002

97.8 95.7Selenium BDL 2.296.0NC 91.1 5.2 75 - 125 20<0.011 <0.011

91.7 92.8Silver BDL 1.298.9NC 86.9 12.9 75 - 125 200.001 <0.001

m = This parameter is outside laboratory ms/msd specified recovery limits.

Page 2 of 17

QA/QC Data

Parameter BlankMS%

MSD%

MSRPD

QA/QC ReportFebruary 21, 2012



SDG I.D.: GBB43180

LCS%

LCSD%

LCSRPD

%Rec

Limits

%RPDLimits


TPH by GC (Extractable Products) - Ground WaterExt. Petroleum HC ND 70 80 13.3 50 - 150 20

% n-Pentacosane 76 75 86 13.7 50 - 150 20


Volatiles - Ground Water112 1081,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 3.6102 106 3.8 70 - 130 30

130 1231,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 5.5105 99 5.9 70 - 130 30

104 1101,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 5.6100 103 3.0 70 - 130 30


128 1361,1-Dichloroethane ND 6.1118 111 6.1 m70 - 130 30

134 1401,1-Dichloroethene ND 4.4115 104 10.0 m70 - 130 30

>150 >1501,1-Dichloropropene ND NC131 111 16.5 l,m70 - 130 30

103 981,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 5.099 105 5.9 70 - 130 30

100 1051,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 4.9100 100 0.0 70 - 130 30


109 1051,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 3.7105 103 1.9 70 - 130 30

102 1011,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 1.093 100 7.3 70 - 130 30

109 1061,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 2.8101 103 2.0 70 - 130 30

116 1181,2-Dichloroethane ND 1.7108 105 2.8 70 - 130 30

116 1201,2-Dichloropropane ND 3.4108 106 1.9 70 - 130 30






111 1092-Chlorotoluene ND 1.8105 104 1.0 70 - 130 30

105 1112-Hexanone ND 5.6100 105 4.9 70 - 130 30

113 1092-Isopropyltoluene ND 3.6104 103 1.0 70 - 130 30


112 1194-Methyl-2-pentanone ND 6.1104 111 6.5 70 - 130 30

105 128Acetone ND 19.7103 103 0.0 70 - 130 30

107 131Acrylonitrile ND 20.2115 106 8.1 m70 - 130 30

131 133Benzene ND 1.5118 104 12.6 m70 - 130 30

106 102Bromobenzene ND 3.8100 101 1.0 70 - 130 30

125 133Bromochloromethane ND 6.2119 117 1.7 m70 - 130 30

118 118Bromodichloromethane ND 0.0107 106 0.9 70 - 130 30

102 104Bromoform ND 1.9106 108 1.9 70 - 130 30

110 128Bromomethane ND 15.1115 111 3.5 70 - 130 30

103 110Carbon Disulfide ND 6.6111 106 4.6 70 - 130 30

129 118Carbon tetrachloride ND 8.9103 99 4.0 70 - 130 30

110 105Chlorobenzene ND 4.7100 99 1.0 70 - 130 30

132 143Chloroethane ND 8.0119 111 7.0 m70 - 130 30

Page 3 of 17

QA/QC Data

Parameter BlankMS%

MSD%

MSRPD

SDG I.D.: GBB43180

LCS%

LCSD%

LCSRPD

%Rec

Limits

%RPDLimits

120 125Chloroform ND 4.1111 106 4.6 70 - 130 30

118 129Chloromethane ND 8.9101 97 4.0 70 - 130 30

132 136cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 3.0120 117 2.5 m70 - 130 30

115 116cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.9106 106 0.0 70 - 130 30

109 107Dibromochloromethane ND 1.999 102 3.0 70 - 130 30

112 111Dibromoethane ND 0.9103 107 3.8 70 - 130 30

120 116Dibromomethane ND 3.4107 108 0.9 70 - 130 30

100 96Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 4.190 84 6.9 70 - 130 30

114 109Ethylbenzene ND 4.5105 102 2.9 70 - 130 30

94 83Hexachlorobutadiene ND 12.477 82 6.3 70 - 130 30

111 108Isopropylbenzene ND 2.7105 101 3.9 70 - 130 30

114 109m&p-Xylene ND 4.5106 105 0.9 70 - 130 30

143 >150Methyl ethyl ketone ND NC117 106 9.9 m70 - 130 30

112 115Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) ND 2.6105 107 1.9 70 - 130 30

122 124Methylene chloride ND 1.6114 116 1.7 70 - 130 30

104 114Naphthalene ND 9.2103 110 6.6 70 - 130 30

108 101n-Butylbenzene ND 6.7105 103 1.9 70 - 130 30

108 103n-Propylbenzene ND 4.798 94 4.2 70 - 130 30

112 107o-Xylene ND 4.6105 104 1.0 70 - 130 30

107 100p-Isopropyltoluene ND 6.8104 103 1.0 70 - 130 30

111 107sec-Butylbenzene ND 3.7103 99 4.0 70 - 130 30

97 100Styrene ND 3.0104 103 1.0 70 - 130 30

115 111tert-Butylbenzene ND 3.5106 102 3.8 70 - 130 30

109 95Tetrachloroethene ND 13.797 95 2.1 70 - 130 30

148 135Tetrahydrofuran (THF) ND 9.2119 118 0.8 m70 - 130 30

120 116Toluene ND 3.4108 106 1.9 70 - 130 30

133 135trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1.5120 112 6.9 m70 - 130 30

111 112trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.9104 105 1.0 70 - 130 30

109 117trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene ND 7.1123 124 0.8 70 - 130 30

120 114Trichloroethene ND 5.1105 101 3.9 70 - 130 30

123 123Trichlorofluoromethane ND 0.0122 113 7.7 70 - 130 30

121 110Trichlorotrifluoroethane ND 9.5106 101 4.8 70 - 130 30

122 133Vinyl chloride ND 8.6108 101 6.7 m70 - 130 30

103 104% 1,2-dichlorobenzene-d4 103 1.0102 103 1.0 70 - 130 30

99 99% Bromofluorobenzene 96 0.096 99 3.1 70 - 130 30

124 112% Dibromofluoromethane 108 10.2107 104 2.8 70 - 130 30

101 102% Toluene-d8 103 1.0101 101 0.0 70 - 130 30

QA/QC Batch 194465, QC Sample No: BB42729 (BB43180, BB43181, BB43182)

Volatiles - Soil106 1021,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 3.8111 111 0.0 70 - 130 30





101 921,1-Dichloroethene ND 9.3103 102 1.0 70 - 130 30

108 1011,1-Dichloropropene ND 6.7104 106 1.9 70 - 130 30







Page 4 of 17

QA/QC Data

Parameter BlankMS%

MSD%

MSRPD

SDG I.D.: GBB43180

LCS%

LCSD%

LCSRPD

%Rec

Limits

%RPDLimits









66 682-Hexanone ND 3.0112 119 6.1 m70 - 130 30




43 42Acetone ND 2.492 92 0.0 m70 - 130 30

99 101Acrylonitrile ND 2.0109 107 1.9 70 - 130 30

106 101Benzene ND 4.8108 108 0.0 70 - 130 30

103 98Bromobenzene ND 5.0103 103 0.0 70 - 130 30

104 100Bromochloromethane ND 3.9109 109 0.0 70 - 130 30


109 107Bromoform ND 1.9114 117 2.6 70 - 130 30

67 63Bromomethane ND 6.296 92 4.3 m70 - 130 30




43 40Chloroethane ND 7.2103 103 0.0 m70 - 130 30

98 97Chloroform ND 1.0109 109 0.0 70 - 130 30


100 98cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 2.0109 110 0.9 70 - 130 30






109 103Ethylbenzene ND 5.7104 103 1.0 70 - 130 30



110 103m&p-Xylene ND 6.6102 101 1.0 70 - 130 30

62 65Methyl ethyl ketone ND 4.7108 111 2.7 m70 - 130 30



94 104Naphthalene ND 10.1111 111 0.0 70 - 130 30



111 105o-Xylene ND 5.6105 104 1.0 70 - 130 30



113 107Styrene ND 5.5105 105 0.0 70 - 130 30



98 98Tetrahydrofuran (THF) ND 0.0106 103 2.9 70 - 130 30

107 100Toluene ND 6.8106 107 0.9 70 - 130 30

105 96trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 9.0105 105 0.0 70 - 130 30



Page 5 of 17

QA/QC Data

Parameter BlankMS%

MSD%

MSRPD

SDG I.D.: GBB43180

LCS%

LCSD%

LCSRPD

%Rec

Limits

%RPDLimits


<40 <40Trichlorofluoromethane ND NC120 121 0.8 m70 - 130 30


109 107Vinyl chloride ND 1.9105 106 0.9 70 - 130 30




99 98% Toluene-d8 99 1.0100 99 1.0 70 - 130 30

QA/QC Batch 194322, QC Sample No: BB42954 (BB43180, BB43181, BB43182, BB43183)

TPH by GC (Extractable Products) - Soil67 67Ext. Petroleum HC ND 0.071 61 15.2 50 - 150 30

66 66% n-Pentacosane 59 0.082 60 31.0 r50 - 150 30

QA/QC Batch 194321, QC Sample No: BB42985 (BB43180, BB43181, BB43182, BB43183, BB43184, BB43185, BB43186, BB43187, BB43188, BB43189, BB43190, BB43191)

Semivolatiles - Soil82 851,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene ND 3.669 70 1.4 30 - 130 30





84 902,4,5-Trichlorophenol ND 6.970 74 5.6 30 - 130 30


91 942,4-Dichlorophenol ND 3.274 76 2.7 30 - 130 30

44 452,4-Dimethylphenol ND 2.237 38 2.7 30 - 130 30

24 122,4-Dinitrophenol ND 66.7<5 5.2 NC l,m,r30 - 130 30

93 972,4-Dinitrotoluene ND 4.282 84 2.4 30 - 130 30


87 912-Chloronaphthalene ND 4.574 76 2.7 30 - 130 30

81 842-Chlorophenol ND 3.669 71 2.9 30 - 130 30

92 952-Methylnaphthalene ND 3.275 76 1.3 30 - 130 30

77 772-Methylphenol (o-cresol) ND 0.064 65 1.6 30 - 130 30

NC NC2-Nitroaniline ND NC>150 >150 NC l30 - 130 30

88 912-Nitrophenol ND 3.471 73 2.8 30 - 130 30

83 873&4-Methylphenol (m&p-cresol) ND 4.771 73 2.8 30 - 130 30

68 733,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND 7.1101 100 1.0 30 - 130 30

96 1043-Nitroaniline ND 8.0120 121 0.8 30 - 130 30

57 394,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol ND 37.539 46 16.5 r30 - 130 30

87 894-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND 2.377 79 2.6 30 - 130 30

89 944-Chloro-3-methylphenol ND 5.579 81 2.5 30 - 130 30

24 314-Chloroaniline ND 25.535 35 0.0 m30 - 130 30

89 944-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND 5.577 79 2.6 30 - 130 30

92 954-Nitroaniline ND 3.283 84 1.2 30 - 130 30

91 994-Nitrophenol ND 8.466 71 7.3 30 - 130 30

88 91Acenaphthene ND 3.473 74 1.4 30 - 130 30

86 93Acenaphthylene ND 7.873 75 2.7 30 - 130 30

83 86Acetophenone ND 3.671 73 2.8 30 - 130 30

N/A N/AAniline ND NCN/A N/A NC 30 - 130 30

89 94Anthracene ND 5.577 79 2.6 30 - 130 30

87 91Azobenzene ND 4.577 78 1.3 30 - 130 30

92 NCBenz(a)anthracene ND NC82 85 3.6 30 - 130 30

NC NCBenzidine ND NC72 68 5.7 30 - 130 30

NC NCBenzo(a)pyrene ND NC80 80 0.0 30 - 130 30

Page 6 of 17

QA/QC Data

Parameter BlankMS%

MSD%

MSRPD

SDG I.D.: GBB43180

LCS%

LCSD%

LCSRPD

%Rec

Limits

%RPDLimits

NC NCBenzo(b)fluoranthene ND NC85 84 1.2 30 - 130 30

107 97Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 9.877 81 5.1 30 - 130 30

93 108Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 14.986 88 2.3 30 - 130 30

N/A N/ABenzoic acid ND NCN/A N/A NC 30 - 130 30

109 112Benzyl butyl phthalate ND 2.781 84 3.6 30 - 130 30

83 86Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND 3.671 72 1.4 30 - 130 30

79 80Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ND 1.367 69 2.9 30 - 130 30

82 84Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether ND 2.469 71 2.9 30 - 130 30

103 105Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ND 1.984 85 1.2 30 - 130 30

136 142Carbazole ND 4.3100 101 1.0 m30 - 130 30

84 NCChrysene ND NC80 82 2.5 30 - 130 30

108 105Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND 2.878 82 5.0 30 - 130 30

90 93Dibenzofuran ND 3.376 78 2.6 30 - 130 30

91 96Diethyl phthalate ND 5.381 83 2.4 30 - 130 30

89 93Dimethylphthalate ND 4.478 80 2.5 30 - 130 30

96 99Di-n-butylphthalate ND 3.180 81 1.2 30 - 130 30

85 90Di-n-octylphthalate ND 5.789 89 0.0 30 - 130 30

NC NCFluoranthene ND NC78 79 1.3 30 - 130 30

96 101Fluorene ND 5.179 82 3.7 30 - 130 30

92 94Hexachlorobenzene ND 2.281 81 0.0 30 - 130 30


8.2 NCHexachlorocyclopentadiene ND NC15 22 37.8 l,m,r30 - 130 30

78 77Hexachloroethane ND 1.368 68 0.0 30 - 130 30

111 109Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 1.879 81 2.5 30 - 130 30

69 72Isophorone ND 4.359 60 1.7 30 - 130 30

87 90Naphthalene ND 3.470 71 1.4 30 - 130 30

82 85Nitrobenzene ND 3.670 72 2.8 30 - 130 30

70 71N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND 1.462 63 1.6 30 - 130 30

85 88N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND 3.573 76 4.0 30 - 130 30

93 98N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND 5.283 85 2.4 30 - 130 30

93 96Pentachloronitrobenzene ND 3.278 79 1.3 30 - 130 30

79 87Pentachlorophenol ND 9.638 44 14.6 30 - 130 30

NC NCPhenanthrene ND NC81 83 2.4 30 - 130 30

86 89Phenol ND 3.474 75 1.3 30 - 130 30

NC NCPyrene ND NC80 81 1.2 30 - 130 30

52 53Pyridine ND 1.947 48 2.1 30 - 130 30

92 98% 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 73 6.376 79 3.9 15 - 130 30

80 84% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 69 4.966 68 3.0 30 - 130 30

78 82% 2-Fluorophenol 70 5.066 68 3.0 15 - 130 30

76 81% Nitrobenzene-d5 71 6.466 68 3.0 30 - 130 30

78 84% Phenol-d5 72 7.467 69 2.9 15 - 130 30

96 96% Terphenyl-d14 69 0.065 66 1.5 30 - 130 30

QA/QC Batch 194369, QC Sample No: BB43140 (BB43184, BB43185, BB43186, BB43187, BB43188, BB43189, BB43190, BB43191, BB43192, BB43193, BB43194, BB43195, BB43196, BB43197)

TPH by GC (Extractable Products) - Soil73 83Ext. Petroleum HC ND 12.863 75 17.4 50 - 150 30

60 68% n-Pentacosane 46 12.553 60 12.4 50 - 150 30

QA/QC Batch 194366, QC Sample No: BB43140 (BB43192, BB43193, BB43194, BB43195, BB43196, BB43197)

Semivolatiles - Soil90 891,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene ND 1.185 83 2.4 30 - 130 30



Page 7 of 17

QA/QC Data

Parameter BlankMS%

MSD%

MSRPD

SDG I.D.: GBB43180

LCS%

LCSD%

LCSRPD

%Rec

Limits

%RPDLimits





89 882,4-Dichlorophenol ND 1.179 81 2.5 30 - 130 30

38 382,4-Dimethylphenol ND 0.034 37 8.5 30 - 130 30

5.6 5.32,4-Dinitrophenol ND 5.5<5 <5 NC l,m30 - 130 30



91 902-Chloronaphthalene ND 1.183 83 0.0 30 - 130 30

77 772-Chlorophenol ND 0.068 70 2.9 30 - 130 30

88 872-Methylnaphthalene ND 1.179 81 2.5 30 - 130 30

69 702-Methylphenol (o-cresol) ND 1.460 65 8.0 30 - 130 30

NC NC2-Nitroaniline ND NC>150 >150 NC l30 - 130 30

74 742-Nitrophenol ND 0.053 61 14.0 30 - 130 30

72 723&4-Methylphenol (m&p-cresol) ND 0.063 68 7.6 30 - 130 30

107 1063,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND 0.9102 102 0.0 30 - 130 30

115 1113-Nitroaniline ND 3.598 107 8.8 30 - 130 30

63 624,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol ND 1.628 32 13.3 l30 - 130 30

107 1074-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND 0.0102 96 6.1 30 - 130 30

82 794-Chloro-3-methylphenol ND 3.766 75 12.8 30 - 130 30

38 384-Chloroaniline ND 0.030 36 18.2 30 - 130 30

92 924-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND 0.088 86 2.3 30 - 130 30

50 734-Nitroaniline ND 37.455 67 19.7 r30 - 130 30

57 554-Nitrophenol ND 3.639 51 26.7 30 - 130 30

84 84Acenaphthene ND 0.077 78 1.3 30 - 130 30

86 86Acenaphthylene ND 0.079 79 0.0 30 - 130 30

78 77Acetophenone ND 1.365 70 7.4 30 - 130 30

N/A N/AAniline ND NCN/A N/A NC 30 - 130 30

91 89Anthracene ND 2.283 82 1.2 30 - 130 30

74 71Azobenzene ND 4.155 67 19.7 30 - 130 30

98 99Benz(a)anthracene ND 1.088 88 0.0 30 - 130 30

54 62Benzidine ND 13.8123 108 13.0 30 - 130 30

98 97Benzo(a)pyrene ND 1.087 88 1.1 30 - 130 30

112 113Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND 0.9100 101 1.0 30 - 130 30

77 74Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 4.072 76 5.4 30 - 130 30

111 110Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 0.999 96 3.1 30 - 130 30

N/A N/ABenzoic acid ND NCN/A N/A NC 30 - 130 30

78 79Benzyl butyl phthalate ND 1.364 71 10.4 30 - 130 30

77 77Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND 0.063 71 11.9 30 - 130 30

72 71Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ND 1.459 66 11.2 30 - 130 30

60 60Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether ND 0.044 55 22.2 30 - 130 30

87 87Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ND 0.071 79 10.7 30 - 130 30

100 98Carbazole ND 2.090 94 4.3 30 - 130 30

99 101Chrysene ND 2.090 89 1.1 30 - 130 30

80 77Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND 3.876 79 3.9 30 - 130 30

88 88Dibenzofuran ND 0.082 81 1.2 30 - 130 30

85 83Diethyl phthalate ND 2.474 78 5.3 30 - 130 30

92 90Dimethylphthalate ND 2.281 83 2.4 30 - 130 30

87 86Di-n-butylphthalate ND 1.276 80 5.1 30 - 130 30

94 93Di-n-octylphthalate ND 1.178 88 12.0 30 - 130 30

94 97Fluoranthene ND 3.189 88 1.1 30 - 130 30

91 89Fluorene ND 2.284 84 0.0 30 - 130 30

Page 8 of 17

QA/QC Data

Parameter BlankMS%

MSD%

MSRPD

SDG I.D.: GBB43180

LCS%

LCSD%

LCSRPD

%Rec

Limits

%RPDLimits

96 93Hexachlorobenzene ND 3.279 85 7.3 30 - 130 30


59 58Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND 1.754 54 0.0 30 - 130 30

73 70Hexachloroethane ND 4.261 66 7.9 30 - 130 30

79 77Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 2.675 78 3.9 30 - 130 30

62 62Isophorone ND 0.050 57 13.1 30 - 130 30

85 85Naphthalene ND 0.076 78 2.6 30 - 130 30

75 70Nitrobenzene ND 6.959 68 14.2 30 - 130 30

62 69N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND 10.758 63 8.3 30 - 130 30

69 69N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND 0.054 62 13.8 30 - 130 30

89 84N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND 5.880 82 2.5 30 - 130 30

95 96Pentachloronitrobenzene ND 1.088 87 1.1 30 - 130 30

95 98Pentachlorophenol ND 3.160 62 3.3 30 - 130 30

97 95Phenanthrene ND 2.188 88 0.0 30 - 130 30

76 77Phenol ND 1.364 70 9.0 30 - 130 30

100 103Pyrene ND 3.094 91 3.2 30 - 130 30

65 66Pyridine ND 1.555 63 13.6 30 - 130 30

82 79% 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 90 3.757 73 24.6 15 - 130 30

88 88% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 82 0.082 85 3.6 30 - 130 30

75 75% 2-Fluorophenol 78 0.065 69 6.0 15 - 130 30

71 57% Nitrobenzene-d5 76 21.957 64 11.6 30 - 130 30

71 71% Phenol-d5 75 0.059 64 8.1 15 - 130 30

88 94% Terphenyl-d14 73 6.689 81 9.4 30 - 130 30


Volatiles - Water106 1001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 5.8100 102 2.0 70 - 130 30





















51 562-Hexanone ND 9.364 65 1.6 l,m70 - 130 30




64 71Acetone ND 10.473 76 4.0 m70 - 130 30


Page 9 of 17

QA/QC Data

Parameter BlankMS%

MSD%

MSRPD

SDG I.D.: GBB43180

LCS%

LCSD%

LCSRPD

%Rec

Limits

%RPDLimits

110 104Benzene ND 5.6103 98 5.0 70 - 130 30

98 93Bromobenzene ND 5.299 99 0.0 70 - 130 30



86 86Bromoform ND 0.086 88 2.3 70 - 130 30

110 101Bromomethane ND 8.5104 100 3.9 70 - 130 30




103 91Chloroethane ND 12.4101 97 4.0 70 - 130 30

107 98Chloroform ND 8.8100 99 1.0 70 - 130 30







133 125Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 6.2116 118 1.7 m70 - 130 30

113 104Ethylbenzene ND 8.3104 104 0.0 70 - 130 30



120 108m&p-Xylene ND 10.5109 107 1.9 70 - 130 30

75 72Methyl ethyl ketone ND 4.172 65 10.2 l70 - 130 30

62 67Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) ND 7.875 78 3.9 m70 - 130 30


55 70Naphthalene ND 24.081 87 7.1 m70 - 130 30



119 108o-Xylene ND 9.7111 109 1.8 70 - 130 30



112 106Styrene ND 5.5105 105 0.0 70 - 130 30




105 98Toluene ND 6.9101 98 3.0 70 - 130 30



67 70trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene ND 4.495 92 3.2 m70 - 130 30








97 98% Toluene-d8 97 1.097 98 1.0 70 - 130 30

A blank MS/MSD was analyzed with this batch.

Comment:

QA/QC Batch 194685, QC Sample No: BB43411 (BB43183, BB43190, BB43192, BB43193, BB43194, BB43195, BB43196)


Page 10 of 17

QA/QC Data

Parameter BlankMS%

MSD%

MSRPD

SDG I.D.: GBB43180

LCS%

LCSD%

LCSRPD

%Rec

Limits

%RPDLimits





69 951,1-Dichloroethene ND 31.799 115 15.0 m,r70 - 130 30
















58 592-Hexanone ND 1.7124 112 10.2 m70 - 130 30




<40 <40Acetone ND NC75 94 22.5 m70 - 130 30


100 86Benzene ND 15.1119 97 20.4 70 - 130 30

92 87Bromobenzene ND 5.6111 107 3.7 70 - 130 30



85 86Bromoform ND 1.2111 109 1.8 70 - 130 30

47 58Bromomethane ND 21.095 106 10.9 m70 - 130 30

64 89Carbon Disulfide ND 32.7100 118 16.5 m,r70 - 130 30



<40 <40Chloroethane ND NC105 115 9.1 m70 - 130 30

91 93Chloroform ND 2.2106 106 0.0 70 - 130 30








92 88Ethylbenzene ND 4.4110 102 7.5 70 - 130 30



90 86m&p-Xylene ND 4.5108 101 6.7 70 - 130 30




93 105Naphthalene ND 12.1116 127 9.1 70 - 130 30


Page 11 of 17

QA/QC Data

Parameter BlankMS%

MSD%

MSRPD

SDG I.D.: GBB43180

LCS%

LCSD%

LCSRPD

%Rec

Limits

%RPDLimits


93 90o-Xylene ND 3.3109 102 6.6 70 - 130 30



95 90Styrene ND 5.4114 105 8.2 70 - 130 30




90 89Toluene ND 1.1108 104 3.8 70 - 130 30





<40 <40Trichlorofluoromethane ND NC105 120 13.3 m70 - 130 30

68 97Trichlorotrifluoroethane ND 35.295 116 19.9 m,r70 - 130 30





101 101% Toluene-d8 95 0.0101 102 1.0 70 - 130 30









67 681,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 1.5103 95 8.1 m70 - 130 30


65 631,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 3.189 82 8.2 m70 - 130 30












53 522-Hexanone ND 1.9113 110 2.7 m70 - 130 30




<40 <40Acetone ND NC97 91 6.4 m70 - 130 30


101 97Benzene ND 4.0111 109 1.8 70 - 130 30

88 86Bromobenzene ND 2.3107 101 5.8 70 - 130 30


Page 12 of 17

QA/QC Data

Parameter BlankMS%

MSD%

MSRPD

SDG I.D.: GBB43180

LCS%

LCSD%

LCSRPD

%Rec

Limits

%RPDLimits


97 96Bromoform ND 1.0124 120 3.3 70 - 130 30

101 95Bromomethane ND 6.1101 97 4.0 70 - 130 30




114 110Chloroethane ND 3.6110 107 2.8 70 - 130 30

101 101Chloroform ND 0.0115 109 5.4 70 - 130 30








97 93Ethylbenzene ND 4.2108 105 2.8 70 - 130 30



96 91m&p-Xylene ND 5.3107 102 4.8 70 - 130 30




69 72Naphthalene ND 4.3115 110 4.4 m70 - 130 30



99 94o-Xylene ND 5.2110 106 3.7 70 - 130 30



93 88Styrene ND 5.5111 106 4.6 70 - 130 30




98 94Toluene ND 4.2109 105 3.7 70 - 130 30





122 118Trichlorofluoromethane ND 3.3137 132 3.7 l70 - 130 30






99 99% Toluene-d8 97 0.098 100 2.0 70 - 130 30


Semivolatiles - Ground Water1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene ND 87 77 12.2 30 - 130 20

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 77 75 2.6 30 - 130 20

1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 80 79 1.3 30 - 130 20



2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ND 92 82 11.5 30 - 130 20

Page 13 of 17

QA/QC Data

Parameter BlankMS%

MSD%

MSRPD

SDG I.D.: GBB43180

LCS%

LCSD%

LCSRPD

%Rec

Limits

%RPDLimits

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND 97 86 12.0 30 - 130 20

2,4-Dichlorophenol ND 87 86 1.2 30 - 130 20

2,4-Dimethylphenol ND 46 45 2.2 30 - 130 20

2,4-Dinitrophenol ND 46 60 26.4 r30 - 130 20

2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND 91 91 0.0 30 - 130 20

2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND 92 92 0.0 30 - 130 20

2-Chloronaphthalene ND 86 85 1.2 30 - 130 20

2-Chlorophenol ND 75 75 0.0 30 - 130 20

2-Methylnaphthalene ND 88 84 4.7 30 - 130 20

2-Methylphenol (o-cresol) ND 76 74 2.7 30 - 130 20

2-Nitroaniline ND >150 >150 NC l30 - 130 20

2-Nitrophenol ND 82 83 1.2 30 - 130 20

3&4-Methylphenol (m&p-cresol) ND 85 79 7.3 30 - 130 20

3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND N/A N/A NC 30 - 130 20

3-Nitroaniline ND >150 >150 NC l30 - 130 20

4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol ND 74 85 13.8 30 - 130 20

4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND 93 88 5.5 30 - 130 20

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ND 93 90 3.3 30 - 130 20

4-Chloroaniline ND 38 36 5.4 30 - 130 20

4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND 91 89 2.2 30 - 130 20

4-Nitroaniline ND 90 91 1.1 30 - 130 20

4-Nitrophenol ND 74 79 6.5 30 - 130 20

Acenaphthene ND 90 87 3.4 30 - 130 20

Acenaphthylene ND 85 84 1.2 30 - 130 20

Acetophenone ND 85 84 1.2 30 - 130 20

Aniline ND N/A N/A NC 30 - 130 20

Anthracene ND 91 89 2.2 30 - 130 20

Azobenzene ND 92 90 2.2 30 - 130 20

Benz(a)anthracene ND 99 96 3.1 30 - 130 20

Benzidine ND N/A N/A NC 10 - 130 20

Benzo(a)pyrene ND 92 90 2.2 30 - 130 20

Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND 104 90 14.4 30 - 130 20

Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 97 97 0.0 30 - 130 20

Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 107 94 12.9 30 - 130 20

Benzoic acid ND N/A N/A NC 30 - 130 20

Benzyl butyl phthalate ND 92 82 11.5 30 - 130 20

Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND 86 84 2.4 30 - 130 20

Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ND 80 81 1.2 30 - 130 20

Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether ND 95 88 7.7 30 - 130 20

Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ND 117 109 7.1 30 - 130 20

Carbazole ND 139 137 1.4 l30 - 130 20

Chrysene ND 99 99 0.0 30 - 130 20

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND 92 92 0.0 30 - 130 20

Dibenzofuran ND 88 88 0.0 30 - 130 20

Diethyl phthalate ND 83 80 3.7 30 - 130 20

Dimethylphthalate ND 72 70 2.8 30 - 130 20

Di-n-butylphthalate ND 99 93 6.3 30 - 130 20

Di-n-octylphthalate ND 98 92 6.3 30 - 130 20

Fluoranthene ND 94 93 1.1 30 - 130 20

Fluorene ND 92 91 1.1 30 - 130 20

Hexachlorobenzene ND 99 93 6.3 30 - 130 20

Hexachlorobutadiene ND 81 79 2.5 30 - 130 20

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND 30 30 0.0 30 - 130 20

Page 14 of 17

QA/QC Data

Parameter BlankMS%

MSD%

MSRPD

SDG I.D.: GBB43180

LCS%

LCSD%

LCSRPD

%Rec

Limits

%RPDLimits

Hexachloroethane ND 79 78 1.3 30 - 130 20

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 94 95 1.1 30 - 130 20

Isophorone ND 69 69 0.0 30 - 130 20

Naphthalene ND 84 81 3.6 30 - 130 20

Nitrobenzene ND 86 86 0.0 30 - 130 20

N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND 66 67 1.5 30 - 130 20

N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND 93 85 9.0 30 - 130 20

N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND 99 99 0.0 30 - 130 20

Pentachloronitrobenzene ND 97 92 5.3 30 - 130 20

Pentachlorophenol ND 77 79 2.6 30 - 130 20

Phenanthrene ND 96 94 2.1 30 - 130 20

Phenol ND 73 74 1.4 30 - 130 20

Pyrene ND 98 96 2.1 30 - 130 20

Pyridine ND 16 15 6.5 l30 - 130 20

% 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 98 95 93 2.1 15 - 130 20

% 2-Fluorobiphenyl 74 80 74 7.8 30 - 130 20

% 2-Fluorophenol 69 64 64 0.0 15 - 130 20

% Nitrobenzene-d5 67 80 78 2.5 30 - 130 20

% Phenol-d5 67 64 65 1.6 15 - 130 20

% Terphenyl-d14 90 94 90 4.3 30 - 130 20

A LCS and LCS Duplicate were performed instead of a matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate.

Comment:

QA/QC Batch 194691, QC Sample No: BB44033 (BB43184, BB43185, BB43187, BB43188, BB43189, BB43197)






















51 502-Hexanone ND 2.0103 105 1.9 m70 - 130 30




<40 <40Acetone ND NC81 63 25.0 l,m70 - 130 30


78 94Benzene ND 18.685 106 22.0 70 - 130 30

Page 15 of 17

QA/QC Data

Parameter BlankMS%

MSD%

MSRPD

SDG I.D.: GBB43180

LCS%

LCSD%

LCSRPD

%Rec

Limits

%RPDLimits

79 80Bromobenzene ND 1.387 98 11.9 70 - 130 30



84 87Bromoform ND 3.5101 104 2.9 70 - 130 30

93 83Bromomethane ND 11.492 82 11.5 70 - 130 30




99 88Chloroethane ND 11.896 92 4.3 70 - 130 30

87 86Chloroform ND 1.297 98 1.0 70 - 130 30








79 84Ethylbenzene ND 6.187 93 6.7 70 - 130 30



75 80m&p-Xylene ND 6.584 90 6.9 70 - 130 30




58 57Naphthalene ND 1.7106 103 2.9 m70 - 130 30



79 85o-Xylene ND 7.387 94 7.7 70 - 130 30



74 81Styrene ND 9.089 97 8.6 70 - 130 30




82 83Toluene ND 1.289 97 8.6 70 - 130 30











102 101% Toluene-d8 101 1.0101 103 2.0 70 - 130 30

l = This parameter is outside laboratory lcs/lcsd specified recovery limits.m = This parameter is outside laboratory ms/msd specified recovery limits.r = This parameter is outside laboratory rpd specified recovery limits.

Page 16 of 17

QA/QC Data

Parameter BlankMS%

MSD%

MSRPD

SDG I.D.: GBB43180

LCS%

LCSD%

LCSRPD

%Rec

Limits

%RPDLimits

MS - Matrix SpikePhyllis Shiller, Laboratory Director


February 21, 2012MS Dup - Matrix Spike Duplicate

RPD - Relative Percent DifferenceLCS - Laboratory Control SampleLCSD - Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate

NC - No Criteria

Page 17 of 17

Sample Criteria Exceedences ReportTuesday, February 21, 2012 Page 1 of 1

Acode Phoenix AnalyteFactoredCriteriaResult RLCriteria NameSampNo LocCode

AnalysisUnitsST State Category

CriteriaUnits

GBB43180Requested Criteria: GAM, GWP, RCFactored

RLCriteria

SPLP-PB SPLP Lead 0.0150.050 0.010 mg/LBB43180 MAGU-DAS CT Inorganic Substances GA/GAA PMC (mg/l)**mg/l 0.015



$8260GWR Acrylonitrile 0.5ND 5.0 ug/LBB43198 MAGU-DAS CT Volatile Organic Compound GWPC (µg/L)ug/L 0.5$8260GWR Dibromoethane 0.05ND 1.0 ug/LBB43198 MAGU-DAS CT Volatile Organic Compound GWPC (µg/L)ug/L 0.05$8270-SIMFSR Pyridine 0.7ND 5.0 ug/LBB43198 MAGU-DAS CT Semivolatile Organic Comp GWPC (µg/L)ug/L 0.7$8270-SIMFSR Aniline 6ND 10 ug/LBB43198 MAGU-DAS CT Semivolatile Organic Comp GWPC (µg/L)ug/L 6$8270-SIMFSR 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 10ND 50 ug/LBB43198 MAGU-DAS CT Semivolatile Organic Comp GWPC (µg/L)ug/L 10$8270-SIMR Benz(a)anthracene 0.060.2 0.040 ug/LBB43198 MAGU-DAS CT Semivolatile Organic Comp GWPC (µg/L)ug/L 0.06$8270-SIMR Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.080.33 0.050 ug/LBB43198 MAGU-DAS CT Semivolatile Organic Comp GWPC (µg/L)ug/L 0.08$8270-SIMR Benzo(a)pyrene 0.20.22 0.050 ug/LBB43198 MAGU-DAS CT Semivolatile Organic Comp GWPC (µg/L)ug/L 0.2AS-WM Arsenic 0.010.019 0.004 mg/LBB43198 MAGU-DAS CT Inorganic Substances GWPC (µg/L)ug/L 0.01

Phoenix Laboratories does not assume responsibility for the data contained in this report. It is provided as an additional tool to identify requested criteria exceedences. All efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of the data (obtained from appropriate agencies). A lack of exceedence information does not necessarily suggest conformance to the criteria. It is ultimately the site professional's responsibility to determine appropriate compliance.

YesWere all samples received by the laboratory in a condition consistent with that described on the associated Chain-of-Custody document(s)?

For each analytical method referenced in this laboratory report package, were all specified QA/QC performance criteria followed, including the requirement to explain any criteria falling outside of acceptable guidelines, as specified in the CT DEP method-specific Reasonable Confidence Protocol documents?

No

Were all QA/QC performance criteria specified in the Reasonable Confidence Protocol documents acheived? See Sections: SVOA Narration, VOA Narration.

For each analytical method referenced in this laboratory report package, were results reported for all constituents identified in the method-specific analyte lists presented in the Reasonable Confidence Protocol documents?

I, the undersigned, attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, to the best of my knowlegde and belief and based upon my personal inquiry of those responsible for providing the information contained in this analytical report, such information is accurate and complete.

2.

1.

4.

6.

Tuesday, February 21, 2012Date:

For all questions to which the response was "No" (with the exception of question #5a, #7), additional information must be provided in an attached narrative. If the answer to question #1, #1A or 1B is "No", the data package does not meet the requirements for "Reasonable Confidence".

Authorized Signature:

Client: MAGU-DAS

Project Number:

Phoenix Environmental Labs, Inc.Laboratory Name:

Project Location:

BB43180, BB43181, BB43182, BB43183, BB43184, BB43185, BB43186, BB43187, BB43188, BB43189, BB43190, BB43191, BB43192, BB43193, BB43194, BB43195, BB43196, BB43197, BB43198, BB43199, BB43200

Reasonable Confidence ProtocolLaboratory Analysis QA/QC Certification Form

BRADLEY AIRPORT SEWER

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Laboratory Sample ID(s):

Sampling Date(s): 2/13/2012

Were samples received at an appropriate temperature (< 6 Degrees C)? 3. Yes No

Were these reporting limits met? 5b. Yes No

Are project-specific matrix spikes and laboratory duplicates included in the data set? 7. Yes No

Note:

NA

Greg Lawrence

Assistant Lab Director

Printed Name:

Position:

1311/1312 6010 7000 7196 7470/7471 8081

8082 8151 8260 8270 ETPH

RCP Methods Used:

YesWere the method specified preservation and holding time requirements met? No 1a.

EPH and VPH methods only: Was the VPH or EPH method conducted without significant modifications (see section 11.3 of respective RCP methods)

1b.Yes No NA

Were reporting limits specified or referenced on the chain-of-custody? 5a. Yes No

NA

NA

Nov 2007

9010/9012

NA

EPH

VPH

TO15

RCP Certification ReportFebruary 21, 2012



SDG I.D.: GBB43180

The client requested a shorter list of elements than the 6010 RCP list.

8270 Semi-volatile Organics: Sample ID BB43198In order to achieve the requested reporting levels for the target compounds, the sample was extracted and analyzed via 8270 selective ion monitoring (SIM) as well as 8270 full scan. Pyridine was analyzed only by full scan and the reporting level does not meet GWP criteria.Aniline and 3,3- Dichlorobenzidine reporting levels do not meet GWP criteria.

ETPH NarrationWere all QA/QC performance criteria specified in the Reasonable Confidence Protocol documents achieved? Yes.

Au-fid1 02/15/12-2 (BB43198, BB43199)Instrument:

Printed Name Jeff BuckoPosition: ChemistDate: 2/15/2012

Initial Calibration (FID1 - ETPH_1) - The initial calibration curve was within method criteria and had a %RSD less than 30%.

The daily continuing calibration standard was within method criteria of +/- 30% RSD.

As per section 7.2.3, a discrimination check standard was run and contained the following outliers: None

Au-xl1 02/15/12-1 (BB43180, BB43181, BB43182, BB43183, BB43184, BB43185, BB43186, BB43187, BB43188, BB43189)

Instrument:


Initial Calibration (FIDXL1 ETPH_1) - The initial calibration curve was within method criteria and had a %RSD less than 30%.


As per section 7.2.3, a discrimination check standard was run and contained the following outliers: None

Au-xl1 02/15/12-2 (BB43190, BB43191, BB43192, BB43193, BB43194, BB43195, BB43196, BB43197)

Instrument:

Initial Calibration (FIDXL1 ETPH_1) - The initial calibration curve was within method criteria and had a %RSD less than 30%.


As per section 7.2.3, a discrimination check standard was run and contained the following outliers:C36

Page 1 of 15




SDG I.D.: GBB43180


----------- Sample No: BB42551, QA/QC Batch: 194253 -----------

All LCS recoveries were within 50 - 150 with the following exceptions: None.

All LCSD recoveries were within 50 - 150 with the following exceptions: None.

All LCS/LCSD RPDs were less than 20% with the following exceptions: None.




All LCS/LCSD RPDs were less than 30% with the following exceptions: % n-Pentacosane(31.0%)





QC (Batch Specific)

Mercury NarrationWere all QA/QC performance criteria specified in the Reasonable Confidence Protocol documents achieved? Yes.

Merlin 02/15/12-1 (BB43180, BB43181, BB43182, BB43183, BB43184, BB43185, BB43186, BB43187, BB43188, BB43189, BB43190, BB43191, BB43192, BB43193, BB43194, BB43195, BB43196, BB43197, BB43198, BB43199)

Instrument:

Printed Name Rick SchweitzerPosition: ChemistDate: 2/15/2012

The method preparation blank contains all of the acids and reagents as the samples; the instrument blanks do not.The initial calibration met all criteria including a standard run at or below the reporting level.All calibration verification standards (ICV, CCV) met criteria. All calibration blank verification standards (ICB, CCB) met criteria. The matrix spike sample is used to identify spectral interfernce for each batch of samples, if within 85-115%, no interference is observed and no further action is taken.

Page 2 of 15




SDG I.D.: GBB43180





All MS recoveries were within 75 - 125 with the following exceptions: None.

All MSD recoveries were within 75 - 125 with the following exceptions: None.

All MS/MSD RPDs were less than 30% with the following exceptions: None.












Additional Mercury criteria: LCS acceptance range for waters is 80-120% and for soils is 70-130%.

QC (Site Specific)

QC (Batch Specific)A matrix effect is suspected when a MS/MSD recovery is outside of criteria. No further action is required if LCS/LCSD compounds are within criteria.

ICP NarrationWere all QA/QC performance criteria specified in the Reasonable Confidence Protocol documents achieved? Yes.

Page 3 of 15




SDG I.D.: GBB43180

Icp7 02/14/12-1 (BB43180, BB43181, BB43182, BB43183, BB43184, BB43185, BB43186, BB43187, BB43188, BB43189, BB43190, BB43191, BB43192, BB43193, BB43194, BB43195, BB43196, BB43197)

Instrument:

Printed Name Laura KinninPosition: ChemistDate: 2/14/2012

The initial calibration met criteria. The continuing calibration standards met criteria for all the elements reported. The linear range is defined daily by the calibration range. The continuing calibration blanks were less than the reporting level for the elements reported.The ICSA and ICSAB were analyzed at the beginning and end of the run and were within criteria.

Icp7 02/15/12-1 (BB43180, BB43181, BB43182, BB43183, BB43184, BB43185, BB43186, BB43187, BB43188, BB43189, BB43190, BB43191, BB43192, BB43193, BB43194, BB43195, BB43196, BB43197)

Instrument:



Icp9 02/14/12-1 (BB43180, BB43181, BB43182, BB43183, BB43184, BB43185, BB43186, BB43187, BB43188, BB43189, BB43190, BB43191, BB43192, BB43193, BB43194, BB43195, BB43196, BB43197, BB43198, BB43199)

Instrument:



Icp9 02/15/12-1 (BB43180, BB43181, BB43182, BB43183, BB43184, BB43185, BB43186, BB43187, BB43188, BB43189, BB43190, BB43191, BB43192, BB43193, BB43194, BB43195, BB43196, BB43197, BB43198, BB43199)

Instrument:


Page 4 of 15




SDG I.D.: GBB43180


Icp9 02/16/12-1 (BB43198)Instrument:



Icp9 02/17/12-1 (BB43198)Instrument:



Page 5 of 15




SDG I.D.: GBB43180
























QC (Site Specific)


Page 6 of 15




SDG I.D.: GBB43180















SVOA NarrationWere all QA/QC performance criteria specified in the Reasonable Confidence Protocol documents achieved? No. The LCS/LCSD recovery for 2,4-Dinitrophenol is below criteria. A low bias for this compound is likely. The LCS and/or the LCSD recovery for 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol, Hexachlorocyclopentadiene is below the lower range, but within the method criteria. A slight low bias for this compound is possible. The LCS/LCSD recovery for several other compounds is above the upper range. These compounds were not reported in the sample, therefore no significant bias is suspected.

Chem06 02/14/12-2 (BB43183, BB43184, BB43185, BB43187, BB43189, BB43190, BB43191)

Instrument:

The DDT breakdown and pentachlorophenol & benzidine peak tailing were not evaluated in the DFTPP tune.

Initial Calibration (Chem06/SV_0207)Greater than 90% of the target compounds met calibration criteria with a RSD <20% or >0.99 correlation coefficient. The following compounds had RSDs >20% and <0.99 correlation coefficient: Hexachlorocyclopentadiene, 2-nitroaniline

The following compounds failed to meet the minimum required response factor: 2-nitrophenol, Hexachlorobenzene

Continuing Calibration:Greater than 80% of target compounds met continuing calibration criteria with a %D <20. The following compounds had >20% difference from

Page 7 of 15




SDG I.D.: GBB43180

Printed Name Damien DrobinskiPosition: ChemistDate: 2/14/2012

the initial calibration: Benzoic Acid, Hexachlorocyclopentadiene, 2,4-Dinitrophenol, 4-Nitrophenol, 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol, Pentachlorophenol

Chem07 02/14/12-2 (BB43180, BB43181, BB43182, BB43192, BB43193, BB43194, BB43195, BB43196, BB43197)

Instrument:



Initial Calibration (Chem07/SV_0209): Greater than 90% of the target compounds met calibration criteria with a RSD <20% or >0.99 correlation coefficient. The following compounds had RSDs >20% and <0.99 correlation coefficient: 2,4-dinitrophenol, 2-nitroaniline


Continuing Calibration: Greater than 80% of target compounds met continuing calibration criteria with a %D <20. The following compunds had >20% difference from the initial calibration: Benzoic Acid, Hexachlorocyclopentadiene, 2,4-Dinitrophenol, 2-Nitroaniline, 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol, Pentachlorophenol

Chem09 02/14/12-1 (BB43186, BB43188)Instrument:



Initial Calibration (Chem09/sv_0214):Greater than 90% of the target compounds met calibration criteria with a RSD <20% or >0.99 correlation coefficient. The following compounds had RSDs >20% and <0.99 correlation coefficient: Atrazine, 4-chloroaniline, Hexachlorocyclopentadiene, 3-nitroaniline, 2,4-dinitrophenol, 2-nitroaniline, 4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol, Pentachlorophenol, Carbazole

The following compounds failed to meet the minimum required response factor: Acenaphthene, Hexachlorobenzene

Continuing Calibration:Greater than 80% of target compounds met continuing calibration criteria with a %D <20. The following compunds had >20% difference from the initial calibration: 3-Nitroaniline, 2,4-Dinitrophenol, Carbazole

Chem12 02/16/12-1 (BB43198, BB43199)Instrument:The DDT breakdown and pentachlorophenol & benzidine peak tailing were not evaluated in the DFTPP tune.

Page 8 of 15




SDG I.D.: GBB43180


Initial Calibration (Chem12/SV_0216):

Greater than 90% of the target compounds met calibration criteria with a RSD <20% or >0.99 correlation coefficient. The following compounds had RSDs >20% and <0.99 correlation coefficient: 4-chloroaniline, 3-nitroaniline, Carbazole


Continuing Calibration:Greater than 80% of target compounds met continuing calibration criteria with a %D <20. The following compounds had >20% difference from the initial calibration: Carbazole

QC Batch 94391 02/14/12 (BB43198, BB43199)QC Comments:



All LCS recoveries were within 30 - 130 with the following exceptions: 2,4-Dinitrophenol(<5%), 2-Nitroaniline(>150%), Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(15%)

All LCSD recoveries were within 30 - 130 with the following exceptions: 2,4-Dinitrophenol(5.2%), 2-Nitroaniline(>150%), Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(22%)

All LCS/LCSD RPDs were less than 30% with the following exceptions: Hexachlorocyclopentadiene(37.8%)


All LCS recoveries were within 30 - 130 with the following exceptions: 2,4-Dinitrophenol(<5%), 2-Nitroaniline(>150%), 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol(28%)

All LCSD recoveries were within 30 - 130 with the following exceptions: 2,4-Dinitrophenol(<5%), 2-Nitroaniline(>150%)


Additional 8270 criteria: 10% of compounds can be outside of acceptance criteria as long as recovery is at least 10%. (Acid surrogates acceptance range for aqueous samples: 15-110%, for soils 30-130%)

QC (Batch Specific)

SVOASIM NarrationWere all QA/QC performance criteria specified in the Reasonable Confidence Protocol documents achieved? Yes.

Chem04 02/15/12-2 (BB43198, BB43199)Instrument:The DDT breakdown and pentachlorophenol & benzidine peak tailing were not evaluated in the DFTPP tune.

Page 9 of 15




SDG I.D.: GBB43180


In the event that lower detection levels were requested, the samples may have been analyzed by selective ion monitoring (SIM) mode.

If PAH/base neutral were requested, Phoenix utilized a method that contained a shortened list , so some of the compounds in the narrative may be non-applicable.

Initial Calibration (Chem04/SIM_0209):Greater than 90% of the target compounds met calibration criteria with a RSD <20% or >0.99 correlation coefficient. The following compounds had RSDs >20% and <0.99 correlation coefficient: None

The following compounds failed to meet the minimum required response factor: None

Continuing Calibration:Greater than 80% of target compounds met continuing calibraion criteria with a %D <20. The following compunds had >20% difference from the initial calibration: Pentachlorophenol

QC Batch 94391 02/14/12 (BB43198, BB43199)QC Comments:



All LCS recoveries were within 30 - 130 with the following exceptions: 2-Nitroaniline(>150%), 3-Nitroaniline(>150%), Carbazole(139%), Pyridine(16%)

All LCSD recoveries were within 30 - 130 with the following exceptions: 2-Nitroaniline(>150%), 3-Nitroaniline(>150%), Carbazole(137%), Pyridine(15%)

All LCS/LCSD RPDs were less than 20% with the following exceptions: 2,4-Dinitrophenol(26.4%)

Additional 8270 criteria: 10% of compounds can be outside of acceptance criteria as long as recovery is at least 10%. (Acid surrogates acceptance range for aqueous samples: 15-110%, for soils 30-130%)

QC (Batch Specific)

VOA NarrationWere all QA/QC performance criteria specified in the Reasonable Confidence Protocol documents achieved? No. Batch 194693 - The LCS and/or the LCSD recovery for 2-Hexanone, MEK is below the lower range, but within the method criteria. A slight low bias for this sample is possible. In various Batches the LCS and/or the LCSD recovery for several compounds is above the upper range. These compounds were not reported in the sample, therefore no significant bias is suspected.

Chem02 02/15/12-1 (BB43198, BB43199)Instrument:P-SideInitial Calibration (RPP_0207):

Page 10 of 15




SDG I.D.: GBB43180

Printed Name Tina CovenskyPosition: ChemistDate: 2/15/2012

All SPCCs, CCCs and >80% of target compounds met criteria except that the following compounds had %RSDs >20%: Acetone, M&p-xylene, Styrene, Bromoform, Trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene

Continuing Calibration Verification:All SPCCs, CCCs and >80% of target compounds met criteria. Internal standards were within the 50%-200% deviation from the initial calibration. The following compounds had % Deviations >30%: Tetrahydrofuran (THF)

Chem02 02/15/12-2 (BB43200)Instrument:

Printed Name Tina CovenskyPosition: ChemistDate: 2/15/2012

P-SideInitial Calibration (RPP_0207):All SPCCs, CCCs and >80% of target compounds met criteria except that the following compounds had %RSDs >20%: Acetone, M&p-xylene, Styrene, Bromoform, Trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene

Continuing Calibration Verification:All SPCCs, CCCs and >80% of target compounds met criteria. Internal standards were within the 50%-200% deviation from the initial calibration. The following compounds had % Deviations >30%: Tetrahydrofuran (THF), Methyl Ethyl Ketone, Bromochloromethane, % Dibromofluoromethane, 1,1-Dichloropropene

Chem03 02/14/12-1 (BB43180, BB43181, BB43182)Instrument:

Printed Name Johanna HarringtonPosition: ChemistDate: 2/14/2012

Initial Calibration Verification (RCPS_0214):>90% of target compounds met method criteria.The following compounds had %RSDs >20%: Acetone, Trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene

Continuing Calibration Verification:>80% of target compounds met method criteria. Internal standards were within the 50%-200% deviation from the initial calibration.The following compounds had % Deviations >20%: None.

Chem03 02/14/12-2 (BB43186, BB43191)Instrument:Initial Calibration Verification (RCPS_0214):>90% of target compounds met method criteria.The following compounds had %RSDs >20%: Acetone, Trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene

Continuing Calibration Verification:>80% of target compounds met method criteria. Internal standards were within the 50%-200% deviation from the initial calibration.

Page 11 of 15




SDG I.D.: GBB43180


The following compounds had % Deviations >20%: Tetrahydrofuran (THF)

Chem08 02/17/12-1 (BB43200)Instrument:


S -SideInitial Calibration(RCPS_0215):All SPCCs, CCCs and >80% of target compounds met criteria except that the following compounds had %RSDs >20%: Trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene

Continuing Calibration Verification:All SPCCs, CCCs and >80% of target compounds met criteria. Internal standards were within the 50%-200% deviation from the initial calibration. The following compounds had % Deviations: Dichlorodifluoromethane, 2-Hexanone

Chem11 02/15/12-1 (BB43183, BB43190, BB43192, BB43193, BB43194, BB43195, BB43196)

Instrument:


Initial Calibration Verification (CHEM11/RCPS_0214):>90% of target compounds met criteria. The following compounds had %RSDs >20%: Acetone

Continuing Calibration Verification:>80% of target compounds met criteria. Internal standards were within the 50%-200% deviation from the initial calibration.The following compounds had % Deviations >30%: Acrolein, Acetone, Tetrahydrofuran (THF)

Chem11 02/16/12-3 (BB43184, BB43185, BB43187, BB43188, BB43189, BB43197)Instrument:


Initial Calibration Verification (CHEM11/RCPS_0214):>90% of target compounds met criteria. The following compounds had %RSDs >20%: Acetone

Continuing Calibration Verification:>80% of target compounds met criteria. Internal standards were within the 50%-200% deviation from the initial calibration.The following compounds had % Deviations >30%: None.

Page 12 of 15




SDG I.D.: GBB43180

QC Batch 94693 02/20/12 (BB43200)QC Comments:

A blank MS/MSD was analyzed with this batch.

Page 13 of 15




SDG I.D.: GBB43180


All LCS recoveries were within 70 - 130 with the following exceptions: 2-Hexanone(64%)

All LCSD recoveries were within 70 - 130 with the following exceptions: 2-Hexanone(65%), Methyl ethyl ketone(65%)


All MS recoveries were within 70 - 130 with the following exceptions: 2-Hexanone(51%), Acetone(64%), Dichlorodifluoromethane(133%), Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE)(62%), Naphthalene(55%), trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene(67%)

All MSD recoveries were within 70 - 130 with the following exceptions: 2-Hexanone(56%), Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE)(67%)



All LCS recoveries were within 70 - 130 with the following exceptions: 1,1-Dichloropropene(131%)












All LCS recoveries were within 70 - 130 with the following exceptions: Trichlorofluoromethane(137%)

All LCSD recoveries were within 70 - 130 with the following exceptions: Trichlorofluoromethane(132%)

QC (Site Specific)


Page 14 of 15




SDG I.D.: GBB43180




All LCSD recoveries were within 70 - 130 with the following exceptions: Acetone(63%)


Additional 8260 criteria: 10% of compounds can be outside of acceptance criteria as long as recovery is 40-160%.

Page 15 of 15



APPENDIX C DQA & DUE Worksheets

1

Date Samples Collected: February 13, 2012

Nonconformance DQA Review Elements Briefly Summarize DQA Nonconformance

LCS, LCSD, MS, & MSD recoveries and LCS/LCSD RPDs show potential high and low biases for VOCs and SVOCs in soil & aqueous samples. Potential bias is outweighed by non-detections (for high bias) or detection limits/detections orders of magnitude less than any applicable RSR or General Permit criteria.

Based on the above findings from the DQA and DUE, the analytical data is of adequate and of sufficient accuracy, precision and sensitivity to identify areas requiring special treatmentand/or handling during the construction phase of the project.

The results will be used to verify the absence or presence and location of subsurface contamination, and to assess the potential pollutant impacts that may be encountered during construction

A data quality assessment and data usability evaluation was performed for the data generated in accordance with the CTDEP’s “Laboratory Quality Assurance and Quality Control,Data Quality Assessment and Data Usability Evaluation Guidance Document”.

Non-conformances related to LCS/LCSD recoveries, LCS/LCSD RPD, MS/MSD recoveries, ICALs, and CCVs responses do not have significant bearings on the accuracy andusability of the data for its intended purposes. In all cases the non-conformances have no impact to the data usability and is considered of sufficient quality and precision usingmultiple lines of evidence.

The data indicates that contaminants are present in the soil and groundwater at low concentrations that exceed applicable RSR and General Permit criteria. Task 310 Plans andSpecifications will be prepared to address the soil and groundwater contamination during the construction phase.

Laboratory Report: GBB43180

DATA USABILITY EVALUATION WORKSHEET

Reasonable Confidence Evaluation

Chain of Custody Evaluation

Tentatively Identified Compounds

Laboratory: Phoenix Environmental Laboratories

Surrogates

Project Name: Task 210 - Bradley Airport Sanitary Sewer Replacement/Realignment, Windsor Locks, CT

Site-Specific Matrix Spikes and Matrix Spike Duplicates

Sample Preservation & Holding Time Evaluation

DATA USABILITY EVALUATION WORKSHEET

Provide a summary statement describing how the analytical data set relied upon is of adequate quality and of sufficient accuracy, precision, and sensitivity for the intended purpose.

Describe the intended use of the data: To verify the absence or presence and location of subsurface contamination, and to assess the potential pollutant impacts that may be encountered during construction

Laboratory Control Samples

Blank Evaluation

Standard RCP Deliverables

Data Package Inspection

Other QC Data

Sample Result Evaluation

Date Samples Collected:RCP Certification Form Included:Lab Case Narrative Included:Project Purpose:

Sample ID Sample Date Compound(s) QC OUTLIER POTENTIAL BIAS COMMENTS PRELIMINARY DUE CONSIDERATIONS/NOTESSVOC Analysis ‐ 8270

GP-1 2'-4'

GP-1 10'-12'GP-2 2'-4'GP-2 10'-12'GP-3 2'-4'GP-3 10'-12'GP-4 2'-4'GP-4 10'-12'GP-5 2'-4'GP-5 10'-12'GP-6 2'-4'GP-7 2'-4'GP-8 2'-4'GP-9 2'-4'GP-10 2'-4'GP-11 2'-4'GP-12 2'-4'GP-13 2'-4'

GP-1 2'-4'GP-1 10'-12'GP-2 2'-4'GP-2 10'-12'GP-3 2'-4'GP-3 10'-12'GP-4 2'-4'GP-4 10'-12'GP-5 2'-4'GP-5 10'-12'GP-6 2'-4'GP-7 2'-4'

2/13/2012

(2) Continuing Calibration Verification (CCV) for Method 8270 on February 14, 2012 failed to the continuing calibration criteria for Benzoic Acid, Hexachlorocyclopentadiene, 2,4-Dinitrophenol, 2-Nitroaniline, 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol, Pentachlorophenol, 3-Nitroaniline, Carbazole, 4-Nitrophenol, & 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol

LCS/LCSD RPD non-directional Multiple lines of evidence support data usabilityPoor performing compound and not contaminant of concern

No impact to data usability

2/13/2012 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene

(3) Calibration Method 8270 on February 14, 2012 failed to meet the minimum response factors for Hexachlorobenzene, Acenaphthene, & 2-Nitrophenol

Notes:SVOC Analysis Notes ‐ Method 8270(1) Initial Calibration (ICAL) for Method 8270 on February 14, 2012 failed to meet the calibration criteria for Atrazine, 4-Chloroaniline, Hexachlorocyclopentadiene, 3-Nitroaniline, 2,4-Dinitrophenol, 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol, Carbazole, Pentachlorophenol, & 2-Nitroaniline

2‐Nitroaniline LCS/LCSD high Compound ND in all samples

SDG: GBB43180

Notes: (see notes at bottom of sheet)

February 13, 2012YesYesData will be used to verify the absence or presence and location of subsurface contamination, and to assess the potential pollutant impacts that may be encountered during construction

RCP DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT & DATA USABILITY EVALUATION WORKSHEET - SOIL SAMPLES

Laboratory: Phoenix Environmental Laboratories, Inc.Bradley International Airport Sanitary Sewer Replacement/Realignment - Windsor Locks, CT

Page 1


Sample ID Sample Date Compound(s) QC OUTLIER POTENTIAL BIAS COMMENTS PRELIMINARY DUE CONSIDERATIONS/NOTESSVOC Analysis ‐ 8270

GP-1 2'-4'

GP-1 10'-12'GP-2 2'-4'GP-2 10'-12'GP-3 2'-4'GP-3 10'-12'GP-4 2'-4'GP-4 10'-12'GP-5 2'-4'GP-5 10'-12'GP-6 2'-4'GP-7 2'-4'GP-8 2'-4'GP-9 2'-4'GP-10 2'-4'GP-11 2'-4'GP-12 2'-4'GP-13 2'-4'

VOC Analysis ‐ 8260

GP-4 2'-4'GP-7 2'-4'

GP-3 2'-4'GP-3 10'-12'GP-4 2'-4'GP-5 2'-4'GP-5 10'-12'GP-13 2'-4'

SDG: GBB43180February 13, 2012Yes

Multiple lines of evidence support data usability

YesData will be used to verify the absence or presence and location of subsurface contamination, and to assess the potential pollutant impacts that may be encountered during construction

RCP DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT & DATA USABILITY EVALUATION WORKSHEET - SOIL SAMPLESBradley International Airport Sanitary Sewer Replacement/Realignment - Windsor Locks, CT

Laboratory: Phoenix Environmental Laboratories, Inc.

Notes: (see notes at bottom of sheet)

2/13/20122,4‐Dinitrophenol, Hexachlorocyclopentadiene,

4,6‐Dinitro‐2‐methylphenolLCS/LCSD low Poor performing compounds. ND in all samples and detection limits for each are orders of

magnitude less than any applicable RSR criteria.

(1) Initial Calibration (ICAL) for Method 8260 on February 14, 15, & 16, 2012 failed to meet the calibration criteria for Trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene & Acetone(2) Continuing Calibration Verification (CCV) for Method 8260 on February 14 & 15, 2012 failed to the continuing calibration criteria for Tetrahydrofuran, Acetone, Acrolein

Multiple lines of evidence support data usabilityPoor performing compound and LCS recovery acceptablelowLCSD

VOC Analysis Notes ‐ Method 8260

No impact to data usabilityCompound ND in sampleshighLCS/LCSDTrichlorofluoromethane2/13/2012

2/13/2012 Acetone

Notes:

Page 2


Sample ID Sample Date Compound(s) QC OUTLIER POTENTIAL BIAS COMMENTS PRELIMINARY DUE CONSIDERATIONS/NOTESSVOC Analysis ‐ 8270GP-13 GWFB-1

GP-13 GWFB-1

GP-13 GWFB-1

VOC Analysis ‐ 8260

GP-13 GWFB-1

TB-1 2/13/2012 2‐Hexanone, Methyl Ethyl Ketone LCS/LCSD low Poor performing compounds. ND in both samples & detection limits orders of magnitude less than any applicable General Permit criteria.

TB-1 2/13/2012 Dichlorodifluoromethane MS high Poor performing compound & LCS/LCSD recoveries within acceptable ranges

TB-1 2/13/2012 2-Hexanone, Acetone, MTBE, Naphthalene, Trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene MS/MSD low

Multiple poor performing compounds and most LCS/LCSD recoveries within acceptable ranges. Compounds not detected in other project samples. Sample is trip blank and not

critical to overall project scope unless compounds are detected in other samples.







(3) Calibration Method 8270 on February 16, 2012 failed to meet the minimum response factors for 2-Nitrophenol & Hexachlorobenzene

2/13/2012 2‐Nitroaniline, 3‐Nitroaniline, Carbazole LCS/LCSD high

(2) Continuing Calibration Verification (CCV) for Method 8270 on February 16, 2012 failed to the continuing calibration criteria for Carbazole(1) Initial Calibration (ICAL) for Method 8270 on February 16, 2012 failed to meet the calibration criteria for 3-Nitroaniline, 4-Chloroaniline, & Carbazole

Notes:SVOC Analysis Notes ‐ Method 8270

(2) Continuing Calibration Verification (CCV) for Method 8260 on February 15 & 17, 2012 failed to the continuing calibration criteria for Tetrahydrofuran, Methyl Ethyl Ketone, Bromochloromethane, Dibromofluoromethane, Dichlorodifluoromethane, 2-Hexanone, & 1,1-Dichloropropene

VOC Analysis Notes ‐ Method 8260(1) Initial Calibration (ICAL) for Method 8260 on February 15, 2012 failed to meet the calibration criteria for Acetone, Trans-1,4-dichloro-2-butene, Styrene, Bromoform, and m&p-Xylene

SDG: GBB43180

Notes: (see notes at end of DQA)

February 13, 2012YesYesData will be used to verify the absence or presence and location of subsurface contamination, and to assess the potential pollutant impacts that may be encountered during construction

RCP DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT & DATA USABILITY EVALUATION WORKSHEET - AQUEOUS SAMPLESBradley International Airport Sanitary Sewer Replacement/Realignment - Windsor Locks, CT

Laboratory: Phoenix Environmental Laboratories, Inc.

1,1-Dichloropropene

Poor performing compound. ND in both samples and detection limits for each are orders of magnitude less than any applicable General Permit criteria.

2/13/2012 2,4‐Dinitrophenol LCS/LCSD RPD non-directional Poor performing compound and LCS/LCSD recoveries within acceptable ranges

2/13/2012 Pyridine


Compounds ND in samples

2/13/2012 LCS high Compound ND in samples

LCS/LCSD low

Page 3