Upload
tjprc-publications
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/30/2019 TEACHING WITH HUMOR: A BENEVOLENT TEACHING TECHNIQUE FOR SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS IN TEACHER
1/8
International Journal of English and
Literature (IJEL)
ISSN 2249-6912
Vol. 2 Issue 4 Dec - 2012 89-96
TJPRC Pvt. Ltd.,
TEACHING WITH HUMOR: A BENEVOLENT TEACHING TECHNIQUE FOR SECOND
LANGUAGE LEARNERS IN TEACHER EDUCATION
(A REFLECTIVE STUDY)
DR. MUBASHER NADEEM
Director,Division of Arts & Social Sciences, University of Education,Lower Mall Campus, Lahore,Pakista
ABSTRACT
Humor is an important part of human social life and when applied by the teacher in classroom affects students
learning of English as a second language. Teaching is generally considered a serious profession by taking the meanings of
the word serious in literal senses and same is transferred to prospective teachers who are to steer millions of public sector
school students in right direction in their professional life. In teacher education programs the prospective teachers are
injected this seriousness syndrome so far as English language teaching and learning are concerned. Keeping in view this
significant factor the study was designed to know the opinions/reflections of University graduates, studying in different
teacher education degree programs, about the use of humor as pedagogical techniques. The study was conducted on 100
University graduates through an opinionnair for data analysis, findings and conclusion. The results of the study manifest
that the subjects are of the opinion that humor is one of the best ways to teach English language to prospective teachers
who are taught about the seriousness of teaching as a profession. The respondents feel that dominating language instructors
hardly set such an environment that could promote effective English language teaching/learning. Hence, it recommends
that humor may be considered as one of the best ways of teaching English as a foreign language to prospective teachers
and should also be taken as teaching aid like others. Further, there should be an effort on the part of language instructors to
generate cordial relations with learners with the help of humor which can play vital role for effective language teaching and
learning.
KEY WORDS: Tertiary Level, Teacher Education, Prospective Teachers, Humorous Teaching, Foreign Language,
Teaching Aid
INTRODUCTION
Powell (1985) and Proctor (1994) reported that humor communicates issues related to classroom management
without either lessening teachers authority or embarrassing the class. This appears to be very apt when it is applied to our
classrooms especially at tertiary level where students are normally expected to be very serious and good listeners. It is
generally believed that teachers expect high seriousness from the students of advanced level students on the plea that much
is to be done as before joining a University they spent/wasted much of their time at colleges whereas degree programs at
University level are tougher. Hence, teaching with pin drop silence becomes mode of teaching English language at tertiary
level which leaves a lot for students to desire. High seriousness is undoubtedly not a bad element in the class but in
language learning class humor could also play very effective role in the learning of a target language, like English, as
previous research showed that humor can be beneficial to classroom learning (Cornett, 1986; Fisher, 1997).
This study has been designed to probe into this important aspect of classroom situation after having seen a number
of students talking about seriousness of some language instructors who rarely laugh or allow others to laugh in the class in
7/30/2019 TEACHING WITH HUMOR: A BENEVOLENT TEACHING TECHNIQUE FOR SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS IN TEACHER
2/8
90 Dr. Mubasher Nadeem
teacher education programs. It may be true that all work and no play may make Jack a dull boy and intention of the study is
dig out prospective teachers concern regarding use of humor or laughter at tertiary level whether it is benevolent in the
learning of English language or not in teacher education as these prospective teachers are expected to be teaching a foreign
language, English in our case, to school students who need this important language of the global world in their social andprofessional life.
Design and procedure of the study
The study is a survey research focused on the responses/reflections, of the prospective teachers of teacher
education programs who study English language related content and pedagogy based courses in degree programs. The
study was conducted on one hundred prospective teachers of B.ED and M.ED programs through an opinionnair to know
their reflections/responses about the use of humor as a tool for effective teaching/learning of English language as well as
for the creation of such an environment required for the smooth learning of English language content and pedagogy at
tertiary level in teacher education degree programs.
Related work
Deiter (2000) says that unfortunately, students often see many of their classes as boring, difficult and stressful. But it may
be due to some psychological reasons which create de-motivation or anxiety among language learners during the process of
learning a foreign language. Foreign language anxiety or more precisely, foreign language classroom anxiety (FLCA) was
considered to be a situational anxiety experienced in the well-defined situation of the foreign language classroom
(MacIntyre & Gardner, 1991). Horwitz, Horwitz & Cope (1986) conceptualized foreign language anxiety as a distinct
complex of self-perceptions, beliefs, feelings, and behaviors related to classroom language learning arising from the
uniqueness of the language learning process. MacIntyre (1998) also stated that language anxiety is considered as a
situation-specific anxiety, and research on language anxiety should employ measures of anxiety experienced in particular
second/foreign language contexts. He described language anxiety as the worry and negative emotional reaction aroused
when learning or using a second language (p. 27).
The literature on humor in education reveals that humor affects students physically as it relaxes muscles,
stimulates circulation, improves respiration, exercises the lungs and chest muscles, controls hormones that relieve stress on
the body, increases immune system, increases the production of endorphins, and lowers pulse rate and blood pressure
(Berk, 1996; Berk, 2002; Caron, 2002; Mahoney, 2000). The literature on humor in education reveals that humor also
affects students psychologically as it decreases anxiety, stress, and tension; improves self-esteem and morale; and increases
motivation, curiosity, comprehension, and perceived quality of life (Anderson & Arnoult, 1989; Bennett, 2003; Berk, 1996;
Cornett, 1986; Garner, 2006; Philaretou, 2006; Stambor 2006).
In relation to negative effect of such an effect in class, Oxford (1999) indicated that anxiety damages language
learners achievement indirectly through worry and self doubt and directly by reducing participation and creating overt
avoidance of the language. Similarly, Kondo and Yong (2004) argued that foreign language anxiety could have a negative
effect on learners performance. Gregersen (2005) also argued that anxious learners often find it difficult to respond
effectively to their own mistakes. These learners may find their study less enjoyable. In such situation humor could
possibly be one of the ways to generate interest of the learners for foreign language learning on one hand and get better
results in learning it on the other.
Humor has been defined by Steven Leacock as the kindly contemplation of the incongruities of life and the artistic
expression thereof (Berk, 1998). Humor means understanding not only the language and words but also their use, meaning,
7/30/2019 TEACHING WITH HUMOR: A BENEVOLENT TEACHING TECHNIQUE FOR SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS IN TEACHER
3/8
Teaching with Humor: A Benevolent Teaching Technique for 91Second Language Learners in Teacher Education(A Reflective Study)
subtle nuances, the underlying culture, implications and unwritten messages" (Tuncay, 2007). Garner (2005) stated the
following: Humor has also been described as a sense, as in the term, sense of humor. As with any sense, howeversuch as
taste or smellindividuals may have differing levels of receptivity; similarly, humor can be highly personal, contextual,
and subjective. Humor that is of poor taste or is insulting can be stifling rather than enlightening. Simple joke-telling doesnot possess the attributes that well planned and content-specific humor adds to the learning environment.
Regarding the humor in pedagogy, Kher, Molstad & Donahue (1999) stated that humor is often identified as a
teaching technique for developing a positive learning environment. When an instructor establishes a supportive social
climate, students are more likely to be receptive to learning. Humor is a catalyst for classroom magic, when all the
educational elements converge and teacher and student are both positive and excited about learning. Instructors can foster
classroom "magic" through improved communication with students by possessing a playful attitude and a willingness to
use appropriate humor (Golchi & Jamali, 2011).
Hativa (2001) provided a classification of humor in teaching. She classified humor in three main categories. Thefirst category is verbal humor that consists of jokes, anecdotes, language play, etc. The second one is nonverbal humor
such as cartoon, caricature, photon and visual pun. The last one is combined verbal and nonverbal humor that consists of
impersonation, parody, satire, monologue and skit. Chee (2006) also classified humor in teaching into four major
categories:
1. Textual: stories, jokes2. Pictorial: cartoons, comics3. Action/Games: theatre, video, role play, simulation, contests4. Verbal: Puns, word games, acronym
Research suggests that general comprehension and retention of classroom messages were significantly improved
by the use of humor. Casper (1999) stated that learning induced by humor strengthens the learning memory. Ziv (1988)
investigated the effects on student learning of teaching with humor and reported that students appreciate and enjoy learning
with a teacher who uses humor. Similarly, Kaplan and Pascoe (1977) reported that lectures with more concept-related
humor helped students do significantly better on recalling tests of learnt concepts. It is clear that in order to motivate and
have more receptive students, humor is essential to teaching and learning.
Kristmanson (2000) stressed the importance of the affective environment in second language teaching. It cannot
be emphasized enough that students are more willing to participate and take risks in using their second language in a
classroom that allows them to do so without fear of criticism and ridicule. It is important for the teacher to create a
"positive atmosphere" for learning. Humor, by decreasing anxiety and stress can, contribute to this positive classroom, to
class unity and learning.
Deneire (1995) suggests that humor be integrated harmoniously into existing language teaching approaches. The
advantage of humor is that it could be used with any language teaching approach or method. Humorous material can add
variety to the class. Providing a change of pace, and can contribute to reducing tension that many learners feel during the
learning process. But the use of humorous texts in classes should be planned by the teacher. It should give learners the
impression of being spontaneous but yet be an integral part of the course instrumental in building language skills. Watson
and Emerson (1988) state:
7/30/2019 TEACHING WITH HUMOR: A BENEVOLENT TEACHING TECHNIQUE FOR SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS IN TEACHER
4/8
92 Dr. Mubasher Nadeem
When humor is planned as part of the teaching strategy, a caring environment is established, there is
an attitude of flexibility, and communication between student and teacher is that of freedom and
openness. The tone is set allowing for human error with freedom to explore alternatives in the learning
situation. This reduces the authoritarian position of the teacher, allowing the teacher to be a facilitatorof the learning process. Fear and anxiety, only natural in a new and unknown situation, becomes less of
a threat, as a partnershipbetween student and instructor develops (Watson & Emerson, 1988, p.89).
Studies in foreign language acquisition and teaching have acknowledged the use of humor to raise students
motivation in the world language classroom (e.g., Medgyes, 2002; Tosta, 2001) and to teach humor as an important tool in
a foreign culture in order to reach higher social competence (e.g., Zajdman, 1995). Furthermore, humor has been shown to
facilitate the development of listening comprehension and reading. Although numerous studies have shown positive
effects of humor in the classroom (e.g. Berk, 2000; Berwald, 1992; Bryant & Zillmann, 1989; Clabby, 1979; Colwell,
1981; Gorham & Cristophel, 1990; Pollack & Freda 1997), Deneire (1995) reports that humor is still underused in the
foreign language classroom.
RESULTS AND FINDINGS
Sr.
No
Opinion item A great
deal
Much Some
what
Little Never
1 I like dominating English language
teacher.
3 2 5 5 80
2 I expect my language teacher be very
serious in the classroom.
2 5 5 10 78
3 My teacher should tell us every about
English language learning itemshimself/herself without our participation.
4 5 10 5 76
4 Independence of learning of English
language at tertiary level in teacher
education programs is harmful.
2 5 5 5 83
5 I love to see my language instructor
cooperative and smiling person.
90 3 2 4 1
6 All work and no play in language class
surely make Jack a dull boy.
85 5 5 3 2
7 Language teaching with humor
generates conducive environment to
learn English language passionately.
80 3 2 10 5
8 Smiling English language teachers are
better instructors than those who remain
serious in the class.
88 2 3 2 5
9 Language learning activities conducted
with a blend of humor and light tone aregood ways to learn English language.
89 2 3 5 1
10 Teacher teaching English at tertiary level
especially in teacher education programs
should create friendly and students
liked learning environment.
92 1 1 2 4
11 Humorous way of teaching English
language is exciting and result oriented.
80 5 5 5 5
12 Humor is a motivating factor in learning 81 3 4 9 3
7/30/2019 TEACHING WITH HUMOR: A BENEVOLENT TEACHING TECHNIQUE FOR SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS IN TEACHER
5/8
Teaching with Humor: A Benevolent Teaching Technique for 93Second Language Learners in Teacher Education(A Reflective Study)
English as a second language.
13 Friendly teachers leave good
impressions on the prospective teachers.
84 6 2 2 6
14 Friendly classroom environment is also a
good social norm which enablesprospective teachers to practice in their
professional life.
84 4 2 5 5
15 Harsh way of teaching English language
gets me worried about my performance
in and outside the class.
90 2 2 2 4
0
1020
30
4050
6070
8090
100
Ilike
Myteacher
Ilovetosee
Language
Language
Humorousway
Friendly
Harshwayof
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
A great deal
Much
Some what
Little
Never
The analyzed data reflect that a majority of the subjects appear to be having some sort of antagonistic type of
attitude towards high seriousness which is observed during the teaching of English language in teacher education. It may
be due the conservative concept about the teaching profession in the society that a teacher must look like a seer instead of a
facilitator of learning. In Pakistan education is becoming industry and private sector is also shouldering academic
responsibilities just like public sector but on the other hand if the prospective teachers are trained in a congested academic
environment they may not be able to cope up with the growing demand of education in the global village so far as a living
language English is concerned.
The respondents are of the view that language teachers/instructors must adopt such an attitude that shouldgenerate a sense of liking for English language and it may be learnt as a living language is learnt instead of learning in a
classical way. For instance, a living language is to be learnt in an active way through classroom variations, such as pair
work, or group work activities which provide learners chance to talk, chat, converse, in a normal way. If the students come
a across their language teachers with authoritarian conduct they may not be able to get themselves adjusted in the
environment to learn English language effectively.
Light jokes related to the subject matter are in fact a motivating factor to create a sense of ownership to the
language learnt. It is useful not inside the classroom but also desirable outside the classroom as responded by the subjects
because learning a language is a continuing process which need consistence not only the part of learner but the teacher as
well. All types of humor such as stories, jokes, comics, theatre, video, role play, simulation, contests, puns, word games,
acronym, etc., are necessary for prospective teachers who may take them as a piece of advice from their teachers to their
professional life for better foreign language society.
7/30/2019 TEACHING WITH HUMOR: A BENEVOLENT TEACHING TECHNIQUE FOR SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS IN TEACHER
6/8
94 Dr. Mubasher Nadeem
It definitely lessens the dominating position of the teacher at tertiary level but at the same time provides the
instructors such graduates who may become his/her future reference in professional life. Further, as the results show
humorous way teaching a foreign language brings the instructors closer to learners, especially at tertiary level in teacher
education programs, and a solid relationship is established to ensure effective English language teaching and learning attertiary level in teacher education programs.
CONCLUSIONS
In the light of the results of the study it is inferred that humorous way to teaching a foreign language such as
English at tertiary level in teacher education programs is an effective way to ensure effective teaching and learning of
English. It is not only a motivating factor but also appears to be an effective pedagogical language teaching technique to
get the prospective teachers equipped with such a tool that could help them in the social and academic life.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Keeping in view the results and conclusion of the study the following recommendations are made:
1. Humor is an effective teaching technique for the teaching of English at tertiary level. Hence, it may be included asa part of pedagogy for the effective teaching of English and learning.
2. Humorous way of teaching English may be made a part of capacity building component of the teachers engagedin teacher education programs for the teaching/learning of English language.
3. Humorous stories, jokes, comics, theatre, video, role play, simulation, contests, puns, word games, acronym, maybe included in different language teaching courses at tertiary level in the light of academic needs of prospective
teachers.
4. It is recommended that language instructors should also adopt humorous teaching technique while teachingcontent based courses related to English language/literature.
5. Humorous teaching technique may be considered a paradigm shift as well as demand of the present day pedagogyrequired for the teaching and learning of English language at tertiary level in teacher education.
6. It may also be considered as a teaching aid for effective language teaching at tertiary level in teacher educationprograms.
REFERENCES
1. Cornett, C. E. (1986). Learning through Laughter: Humor in the Classroom. Phi Delta Kappa EducationalFoundation, Bloomington, IN. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 276 028). Fastback. 241.
2. Fisher, M. S. (1997). The effect of humor on learning in a planetarium. Science Education, 81(6), 703-713.3. Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B. & Cope, J. A. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language
Journal. 70, 125-132.
4. MacIntyre, P. D. (1998). Language anxiety: A review of the research for language teachers. In D. J. Young (Ed.),Affect in foreign language and second language learning (pp. 24-45). Boston.
5. Kondo, D. S., & Yong, Y. Y. (2004). Strategies for coping with language anxiety: The case of students of Englishin Japan.ELT Journal, 58, 258-265.
7/30/2019 TEACHING WITH HUMOR: A BENEVOLENT TEACHING TECHNIQUE FOR SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS IN TEACHER
7/8
Teaching with Humor: A Benevolent Teaching Technique for 95Second Language Learners in Teacher Education(A Reflective Study)
6. Gregersen, T. (2005). Nonverbal cues: Clues to the detection of foreign language anxiety. Foreign LanguageAnnals, 38, 388-400.
7. Berk, R. A. (1998). Professors Are From Mars, Students Are From Snickers. Madison, WI: Mendota Press.8. Garner, R. (2005). Humor, analogy, and metaphor: H.A.M. it up in teaching. Retrieved October 05, 2012 from
http://radicalpedagogy.icaap.org/ content/issue6_2/garner.html
9. Tuncay, H. (2007). Welcome to hell: Humor in English language learning. Retrieved October 02, 2012, fromhttp://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ ED499225. Pdf
10. Kher, N., Molstad, S. & Donahue, R.( 1999). Using humor in the college classroom to enhance teachingeffectiveness in dread courses. College Student Journal 33, 400-405.
11. Deiter, R. (2000). The use of humor as a teaching tool in the college classroom.NACTA Journal, 44, 20-28.12. Oxford, R. L. (1999). Anxiety and the language learner: New Insights. In Arnold. J (Eds.) Affect in language
learning. (pp. 58-67). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Hativa, N. (2001). Teaching for Effective Learning in Higher Education. Netherlands: Kluwer AcademicPublishers.
14. Mona Mohammadi Golchi & Fatemeh Jamali. The Effect of Teacher's Verbal Humor on Advanced EFL Learners'Classroom Anxiety. European Journal of Social Sciences. ISSN 1450-2267, Vol.26, No.2 (2011), pp. 185-192
15. Casper, R. (1999)Laughter and humor in the classroom: Effects on test performance. University of Nebraska -Lincoln
16. Ziv, A. (1988). Teaching and Learning with Humor: Experiment and Replication. Journal of ExperimentalEducation, 57 (1), 5-15.
17. Kaplan, R. M., and Pascoe, G. C. (1977). Humorous lectures and humorous examples: Some effects uponcomprehension and retention.Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 61-65. Kristmanson, P. (2000). Affect*: in
the second language classroom: How to create an emotional climate.Reflexions , 19 , (2), 1-5.
18. Deneire, M. (1995). Humor and foreign language teaching. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 8(3), 285-298.
19. Watson, M.J. & Emerson, S. (1988). Facilitate learning with humor. Journal of Nursing Education, 2, (2), 89-90.20. Tosta, Antonio L. (2001). Laugh and learn: Thinking over the `funny teacher' myth. Forum 39, 26-31.21. Medgyes, P. (2002). Laughing matters: Humour in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
22. Zajdman, A. (1995). Humorous face-threatening acts: Humor as strategy. Journal of Pragmatics 23, 325-339.23. Berk, R. A. (2000). Does humor in course tests reduce anxiety and improve performance? College Teaching 48
(4), 151-58.
24. Berwald, J-P. (1992). Teaching French language and culture by means of humor. FrenchReview 66(2), 189-200.
7/30/2019 TEACHING WITH HUMOR: A BENEVOLENT TEACHING TECHNIQUE FOR SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS IN TEACHER
8/8
96 Dr. Mubasher Nadeem
25. Bryant, J., Zillmann, D. (1989). Using humor to promote learning in the classroom. Humor and children'sdevelopment. Ed. P. McGhee. NY: Haworth, 49-78.
26. Clabby, J. F., Jr. (1979). Humor as a preferred activity of the creative and humor as afacilitator of learning.Psychology: A Quarterly Journal of Human Behavior 16 (1), 5-12.
27. Colwell, C. G. (1981). Humor as a motivational and remedial technique. Journal of Reading 24 (6), 484-86.28. Gorham, J., Christophel, DM., (1990). Relationship of teachers' use of humor in the classroom to immediacy and
student learning, Communication Education 39 (1), 46-62.
29. Pollak, J. P., Freda, P. (1997). Humor, learning, and socialization in middle level classrooms. Clearing House70 (4 ), 176-78.
30. Deneire, M. (1995). Humor and foreign language teaching. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 8(3), 285-298.
31. Berk, R.A. (1996). Student ratings of 10 strategies for using humor in college teaching.Journal on Excellence inCollege Teaching, 7(3), 71-92.
32. Berk, R.A. (2002). Humor as an instructional defibrillator: Evidence-based techniques inteaching and assessment.Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
33. Caron, J.E. (2002). From ethology to aesthetics: Evolution as a theoretical paradigm forresearch on laughter,humor, and other comic phenomena.Humor15(3), 245-281.
34. Mahoney, D.L. (2000). Is laughter the best medicine or any medicine at all? Eye on PsiChi, 4(3), 18-21.McKeachie, W.J. (1994). Teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (9th
edition). Lexington, MA: DC Health and Company.
35. Anderson, C.A., and Arnoult, L.H. (1989). An examination of perceived control, humor,irrational beliefs, andpositive stress as moderators of the relation between negative stress and health. Basic and Applied Social
Psychology, 10(2), 101-117.
36. Bennett, H.J. (2003). Humor in medicine. Southern Medical Journal, 96(12), 1257-1261.37. Berk, R.A. (1996). Student ratings of 10 strategies for using humor in college teaching.Journal on Excellence in
College Teaching, 7(3), 71-92.
38. Cornett, C.E. (1986). Learning through laughter: Humor in the classroom. Bloomington,IN: Phi Delta KappaEducational Foundation.
39. Garner, R.L. (2006). Humor in pedagogy: How ha-ha can lead to aha! College Teaching,54(1), 177-180.40. Philareatou, A. G. (2006). Learning and laughing about gender and sexuality throughhumor: The woody allen
case. The Journal of Mens Studies, 14(2), 133-144.
41. Powell, J. P. A. (1985). Humor and Teaching in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education, 10 (1), 79-9042. Proctor, R. F. (1994). Communicating rules with a grin. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Central
States Communication Association, Oklahoma City, OK.
43. Stambor, Z. (2006). How laughing leads to learning. Monitor on Psychology 37(6), 62-66.