31
GOVERNING THE FUTURE Maggie Zhang, Livio Quintavalle, Joe Sutanto, Dimitrios Vlachopoulos Team Stockholm

Team Stockholm

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Team Stockholm

GOVERNING THE FUTURE

Maggie Zhang, Livio Quintavalle, Joe Sutanto, Dimitrios Vlachopoulos

Team Stockholm

Page 2: Team Stockholm

NOTE:This presentation was created by a team

of MBA students for educational purposes and in no way reflects the

views and beliefs of Ericsson.

Page 3: Team Stockholm

GOVERNING THE FUTUREVISION

CLIENTS

GOVERNMENTS TO BECOME OUR MAJOR CLIENTS

OPERATORS LOSING POWER. FEE IS NOT ERICSSON’S CONCERN

FEE STRUCTURE

UNATTRACTIVE MARKET FOR ERICSSONROLE OF APPLICATIONS

INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS TO GOVERNMENTS Multimedia, Medical, Transportation, Urban Development

SERVICE ECOSYSTEM

UTILITIESEnergy Smart Grid

SECTOR

AUSTRALIAREGION

Page 4: Team Stockholm

INDUSTRY OVERVIEWSECTION I

Page 5: Team Stockholm
Page 6: Team Stockholm
Page 7: Team Stockholm
Page 8: Team Stockholm
Page 9: Team Stockholm
Page 10: Team Stockholm
Page 11: Team Stockholm

SMART GRIDSECTION II

Page 12: Team Stockholm
Page 13: Team Stockholm
Page 14: Team Stockholm
Page 15: Team Stockholm
Page 16: Team Stockholm
Page 17: Team Stockholm

IMPLEMENTATIONSECTION III

Page 18: Team Stockholm
Page 19: Team Stockholm
Page 20: Team Stockholm
Page 21: Team Stockholm

CONCLUSIONSECTION IV

Page 22: Team Stockholm

GOVERNING THE FUTUREVISION

CLIENTS

GOVERNMENTS TO BECOME OUR MAJOR CLIENTS

OPERATORS LOSING POWER. FEE IS NOT ERICSSON’S CONCERN

FEE STRUCTURE

UNATTRACTIVE MARKET FOR ERICSSONROLE OF APPLICATIONS

INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS TO GOVERNMENTS Multimedia, Medical, Transportation, Urban Development

SERVICE ECOSYSTEM

UTILITIESEnergy Smart Grid

SECTOR

AUSTRALIAREGION

Page 23: Team Stockholm

Appendix

Page 24: Team Stockholm

24

Ericsson’s Positioning in the Value Chain

Page 25: Team Stockholm

Vodafone’s Services

Page 26: Team Stockholm

Governments as Clients

• Canada– Budget 2009 provides $225 million over three years to Industry Canada to develop and implement a strategy

on extending broadband coverage to all currently unserved communities beginning in 2009-10.• Chile

– The development is expected to cost US$100 million, 70% of which will be provided by the government through the Telecoms Development Fund.

• Belgium– Government owns over 50% of the incumbent telco provider Belgacom

• Portugal– In January 2009, Portugal's government announced an 800-million-euro credit line for the roll-out of next-

generation broadband networks in the country• Sweden

– Total state governmental funding $817 million (5.25 billion SEK)• UK

– £200m from direct public funding• South Korea

– The central government will put up $1.1 billion (1.3 trillion won)

• Singapore– The Singaporean government will provide up to S$750 million (US$520 million) in grants to build the Next

Generation National Broadband Network

Page 27: Team Stockholm

Transition to Fixed Mobile

Page 28: Team Stockholm

Smart Grid Potential Partners

Page 29: Team Stockholm

Financials

Australia2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Fiber Optic ($m) $4,700 $5,000 $5,200 $5,400 $5,500Smart Grid ($m) $200 $250 $300 $350 $400

$4,900 $5,250 $5,500 $5,750 $5,900

Global2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Fiber Optic ($m) $46,804 $49,144 $51,601 $54,181 $56,890Smart Grid ($m) $28,900 $34,000 $40,000 $46,000 $52,900

$75,704 $83,144 $91,601 $100,181 $109,790

Source• Australia fiber optic: Australian government media release - $43bn amortised over 8 years ($5.4bn/annum)• Australia smart grid: Technology Industry Association - $200m this year, total of $11bn over the next 20 years• International fiber optic: Telecommunications Industry Association & US National Cable and Telecommunications Association• International smart grid: Morgan Stanley for 2013 and grown at a CAGR of 15% per annum

Page 30: Team Stockholm

Australian Energy Suppliers

Actew AGLAGLAurora EnergyAustralian Power & GasClick EnergyCountry EnergyEnergy AustraliaHorizon PowerIntegral EnergyJackgreenNeighbourhood EnergyOrigin EnergyPower & Water CorporationPowerDirectQueensland ElectricityRed EnergySimply EnergySouth Australian ElectricitySynergyTRUEnergyVictoria Electricity

Page 31: Team Stockholm

California and Idaho Model

Historically: pay the utility based exclusively on how much more energy it sells and how many new power plants it builds

Decoupling: • Regulators compare a utility’s actual energy sales with its predicted sales• Independent auditor determines the saving• Regulator reimburses utility for out of pocket losses and adds a reward in proportion to reductions in customer costs.