technology innovation NOX Holding - Umba.am · NOX HOLDING AG * H.Ollendiek [email protected] 11. o Drill iameterd SDS 75 cm bis 150 cm o Drill iameter Jetd -Stinger 24,13

2014/01/01 NOX HOLDING AG * H.Ollendiek [email protected] 1

innovation

technology

NOXHolding

NOXH O L D I N G

2014/01/01 NOX HOLDING AG * H. Ollendiek [email protected] 2

CEEG-TECHNOLOGYBY PROF. BOHDAN ZAKIEWICZ, PhD

CEEG-TechnologyNOX produces the highest form of energy,

ELECTRICITY,from available renewable energies,o … without using fossil fuels.o … without interfering with the environment.o … without environmental risks.o … without economic risks.o … without the production of CO2.o … at any location worldwide .That is the nicest form ofelectricity production in the 21st century.Based on CEEG-Technologie.Developed and patented by one of the leading experts worldwide in the field of mining and deep drilling:

Herr Prof. Bohdan Zakiewicz


WHAT DOES NOX DO ?

GEOTHERMAL ENERGYCEEG-Technology or Complex Extraction of Energy from Geothermal resourcesis the newest future-orientated geothermal technology of the 21st century.The use of the available heat (energy), stored in the Earth, and being constantly topped up, for the production of electricity.The heat stored in the Earth is inexhaustible according to human measurement. Geothermal energy has a special place among renewable energies because of its special characteristics.


WHAT IS CEEG-TECHNOLOGIE ?


EUROPENORMAL GROUND SITUATION• Temperature gradient:

• About 100 m - 3°C

• 1.000 m - 30°C

• 10.000 m - 300 – 350°C

Irrespective of the season and weather, at any time of the day or night, anywhere in the world, it is always available according to needs.

Capable of bearing a constant load.The Earth emits about four times more energy every day than we humans consume.

It makes sense to promote and use this inexhaustible energy,

o … without special geology.

o … without prospecting risks.

o … without interfering with the environment.

o … without causing seismic activity.

o … at any location in the world.

NOX does that,with the new CEEG-Technology!


GEOTHERMAL ENERGY

DEEP BOREHOLE HEAT EXCHANGERIt is a technology which has been in existence for twenty years, which up to now has only been used at low depths due to the high drilling costs (ca. 3.000 m) and only for heat extraction (Prenzlau/D etc.).This technology has been brought to the state of the art of the 21st century and has been perfected completely.With the cooperation of renowned international enterprises, experts, universitiesand the most highly qualified engineering offices, an old technology has been further developed to become one of the outstanding technologies, with which it is now possible to solve the world's energy problems, now and in the future.


CEEG-TECHNOLOGY

The drilling technology was developed together with one of the biggest international producers of drilling plants.Thus a depth of up to 10.000 m of the deep borehole heat exchanger is possible.Thereby a period of eight weeks per drilling operation (10.000 m / D= ca. 25 cm) is guaranteed.In the development of the technically very demanding inner heat exchanger pipes (Jet-Stinger) we received the support of two of the most reputable engineering firms.Jacobs Engineering/USA and Exponent Engineering/USA made the development and construction of these pipes possible.Under constant use (materials, connections, pressure) a guarantee of 30 years is assured.


CEEG-TECHNOLOGY

Due to the highly insulated inside pipes in the double-walled heat exchanger pipes, a maximum temperature loss (when rising) of 5% is guaranteed. Because of these excellent technical characteristics the heat carrier fluid (water) in the closed primary circuit reaches a temperatureof > 300°C. Above the ground the heat energy from the primary circuit in a heat exchanger is passed on to the secondary circuit (water).The resulting steam powers a conventional steam turbine with an efficiency of about 34% (electricity) .A container solution was developed together with GE (General Electric). A heat exchanger, a steam turbine and a generator are assembled and ready for operation in a 40-foot container. Conventional steam power plant technology is used as it has been for the past hundred years.Thereby each heat exchanger pipe is connected separately to a container solution and operated by computer.In addition, the resulting heat emission can be used. The total system efficiency is about 90% (electricity + heat).


CEEG-TECHNOLOGY


SYSTEM OVERVIEW

Super-Daisy-Shaft

Double-walled heatexchanger pipe

Closed loop

SYSTEM DATAWith CEEG technology a perfectly functioning total system for the production of electricity and heat has come into being which is currently without parallel.

o System-/power plant performance (elektric): 30 MW bis 200 MWo Performance per Jet-Stinger: ca. 8 MW electricityo Technical availability: 8.700 hours/yearo Extraction temperature: > 300°Co Circulation rate: 30 kg/sec. bis 50 kg/sec.o Speed of flow primary circuit (In): 1,5 m/sec. bis 2,5 m/sec. o System pressure primary circuit (above the ground): ca. 60 bar bis 150 baro System pressure secondary circuit (above the ground):o Technology underground (CEEG-Technologie): deep borehole heat exchangero Technology above the ground: 3-Stage steam turbineo System efficiency electric (net): ca. 34%o System efficiency thermal (net additionally): ca. 56%o Total system efficiency: ca. 90%o Technical period of use: 30 yearso Electricity production costs: < 0,030 Euro/kWh


o Drill diameter SDS 75 cm bis 150 cmo Drill diameter Jet-Stinger 24,13 cmo Diameter Jet-Stinger outer 21,6 cmo Diameter Jet-Stinger inner 13,3 cmo Wall strenght cement mantel 1,25 cmo Wall strenght Jet-Stinger outer 0,50 cm

(stainless steel with diamond dust coating)o Lenght Jet-Stinger 10.500 mo Heating period water 1,5 hours

(primary circuit in)o Electricity + heat

o ca. 34% electricity (3-stage-high-pressure turbine)

o ca. 56% heato Electricity without heat

o ca. 50% electricity (3-stage-high-pressure turbine + condensation turbine)


TECHNICAL INFORMATION

CEEG-Technology is currently the cheapest way of producing electricity and heat,not only among renewable energies but also among fossil technologies.Invest - electricity produced.o PV 1.400 € - 0,11 €/kWho Wind (on) 1.400 € - 0,076 €/kWho Biogas 4.000 € - 0,175 €/kWho Lignite 1.525 € - 0,046 €/kWho Hard coal 1.350 € - 0,071 €/kWho GuD 825 € - 0,087 €/kWho CEEG 6.000 € - < 0,03 €/kWhThe operating costs of all fossil fuel powered power stations rise continually due to rising fuel costs.In the case of CEEG-power plants, the running costs remain constant or rather sink by ca. 1/3 after 15 years owing to expiring licence fees.

2014/01/01 NOX HOLDING AG * [email protected] 13

SYSTEM COSTS


ARMENIAGROUNDSITUATION AT THE KARKAR SITE• Former volcanic area• At 1.000 m about 100°C• Drilling depth about 3.000 m• Temperature at 3.000 m is about 300°C

to 350°C• System costs 3.000 €/kW:

3.000.000 €/MW - 4.020.000 US$/MW

KARKAR SITE


GROUND SITUATION

PLANT TYPE TEMPERATURE CAPITAL COSTUS$/kW

HEATTRANSFER CIRCUIT

RISKS TURBINES

KALEX Cycle 110°C ~ 16 OPEN SYSTEM• Toxins in the

thermal circuit• Calcify of the

pipes• Loss of water• Interfering

with the environment

• Seismic activity

• Specificturbines required

ORC 130°C ~ 12 OPEN SYSTEM

FLASH Cycle 300°C ~ 3,8 OPEN SYSTEM

CEEG Technology 300°C – 350°C ~ 4 CLOSED SYSTEM • No risks Conventional

steam turbine


GEOTHERMAL METHODCOMPARISON

After submitting all contracts the following execution periods apply:Activity duration1.0. Setting up the drilling plant 8 months

1.1. work preparation duringPt. 1.0.

2.0. Setting up building sitesConstruction drilling plant 1 month

3.0. Drills SDS (400 m) 1 month4.0. Drills Jet-Stinger/per unit 1 month

4.1. Construction power plantbuilding during Pt. 3.0. + 4.0.4.2. Technical equippingduring Pt. 3.0. + 4.0. + 5.0.4.3. Connection to networkduring Pt. 3.0. + 4.0. + 5.0.

5.0. Dismantling drilling plant 1 month6.0. Final assembly and

commissioning 1 month


EXECUTION TIMES

SUMMARY• … without interfering with the environment• … no toxins in the thermal circuit• … conventional steam turbine – low running costs

• … Heat and electricity• … ground demand and peak demand capable• … operational availability 97% (8.500 h/year)

• … construction costs < Nuclear power plant• … without using fossil fuels• … no dependence on fuels• … no fluctuations in prices

• Electricity producing costs in Armenia: 0,022 Euro/kWh - 0,029 US$/kWh(including heat)


CEEG-Technology

The nicest wayto produce electricity

in the 21st century


CEEG-TECHNOLOGYBY PROF. BOHDAN ZAKIEWICZ, PhD

2014/01/01 NOX HOLDING AG * [email protected] 21

So that the comingGenerations can alsosleep peacefully.

NOXH O L D I N G A G

Thank youfor your attention.

ONE OF THE WORLD-LEADING AUTHORITIESProf. Dipl. Eng. Bohdan Zakiewicz, PhDis one of the world leading experts in the fields of deep drilling, mining, geology and geothermal energy.o Chairman of Geothermic Solution LLC, USA; Head of European Technologie-Plattform „Earth Energy“, EU;

President of the Polish „Laboratory for Radical Technologies“, PL; lectures at the Military University of Technology in Warsaw, PL and is Head of the Intern. Geo-Plutonic Union, EU.

o 20-year professorship at the AGH Cracow.o He has led over 6.000 drillings worldwide (Canada, USA, Mexico, Iraq, China, New Zealand, Australia,

England etc.).o Leading engineer and project developer in the field of sulphur recovery in the Middle East and other

countries.


WHO IS PROF. B. ZAKIEWICZ, PhD ?

NOMINATION FOR NOBEL PRIZEo Developer of numerous mining

technologies and projects in the United States and Poland.

o Leading manager in the oil and mining industry in many countries.

o The holder of numerous US and international patents.

o In a career spanning 50 years, he has obtained a large number of international honours and has received top prizes and awards.

o For his achievements he was nominated for the Nobel prize in 2009.


PROF. B. ZAKIEWICZ, PhD

REFERENCES: Patents Prof. Bohdan Zakiewicz, Phd

Excerpts of specific technologies(from a list of 348 patents and patentable Know-How Technologies)

*All are owned and have been introduced, completed, and published by Dr. Eng. Bohdan Zakiewiczfor large-scale industrial projects which have created a new technological

era of “PRO-ECOLOGICAL BORE-HORE MINING & ENERGY SYSTEMS”

1 Mining of Low Permeability Sulphur Deposits; Polish Patent No. 48,717 –1961(Elements of HC and coal Fluidization)

2 Mining of Non Isolated Thin Sulphur Deposits; Polish Patent No. 57,680 -1969

3 Mining and Confining of Widely Spread Deposits; Polish Patent No. 74,993 – 1972 (Elements of HC and coal Fluidization)

4 Mining of Sulphur; USA Patent No. 4,249,775 – 1981 (Elements of HC and coal Fluidization)

5 Borehole Mining of Solid Mineral Resources; USA Patent No 4,289.354 – 1981 (Fossils Underground Gasification)

6 Oil Recovery Method and Apparatus; USA Patent No. 4,305,463-1981(Recovery of Fluidized Minerals)

7 Process of Recovery of the Hydrogen Carbon from Mineral Oil Deposits; USA Patent No 4,550,779 – 1985(Elements of Hydrogen Carbon coal Fluidization)

8 Thermo-chemical Reforming Process and Plant for Ultra Heavy Crude and Tar; European Patent No. 143,626 – 1991(Elements of Hydrogen Carbon and coal Fluidization)


ANNEX: A-1 – 1/2

9 Recovery and Reforming of Ultra Heavy Tars and Crude Deposits; European Patent No. 144,203 – 1991(Elements of Hydrogen and coal Fluidization)

10 Proceso Reformador Thermo-Chemico y Planta Para Crudo Ultra Posado y Alquitrant; Venezuelan Patent No. 48,741- 1992(Elements of Hydrogen production from HC and coal Fluidization)

11 Recovery & Reforming of Crude at the Heads of Multifunctional Wells and Oil Mining System with Flue Gas Stimulation;USA Patent No. 6,318,468 B1-2001 (Elements of HC and coal Fluidization)

12 Pro-Ecological Mining System; USA Patent No. 6,679,326 B2-2002(Elements of underground HC and coal Gasification, Fluidization and Recovery)

13 Matrix of Meltable Minerals; USA Patent No. 6,627,680 B2, 2003(Method of Fluidization and Processing of minerals)

14 Bore Hole Mining of Coal-Bed Methane, with enhancement by micro-fracturing and dragging forces, with Super Daisy Shaftand Jet Stingers; USA Patent pending, 2006 (Method of un-locking methane from entrapment in coal massif)

15 Thermo-chemical Underground Reforming Process and Plant for Comprehensive Extraction of Energy from Coal deposits(CEEC technology); USA Patent Pending, 2006 (Method of Production high quality synthesis gas and low cost electrical energy)

16 Geothermal Energy Extraction from hot water aquifers without damaging of the natural resources;USA Patent Pending, 2007 (Production low cost energy without pumping warm water from aquifers)

17 GEO-PLUTONIC ENERGY EXTRACTION from deep, dry Geo-plutonic heat energy as nationwide strategic resource of low costelectricity Power generation; USA Patent No. 8020382, 2008 (Closed loop, Ho Dry Rock Heat Recovery Process with SDS technology


ANNEX: A-1 – 2/2REFERENCES: Patents Prof. Bohdan Zakiewicz, Phd

REFERENCES: Complex Projects Prof. Bohdan Zakiewicz, Phd

Leading International Projects, successfully executed under theGeneral Management of Prof. B. Zakiewicz, Phd

*These projects incorporate Dr. B. Zakiewicz’s technologies and have been correlated with“UNCOMCOAL”, “GEOTHERMIC-FENIX”, “THERMOFLUID TECHNOLOGY”, “CEEC”, “GEOTHERMIC SOLUTION”,

"HYDRO-THERMAL-DYNAMIC” along with other technologies and innovatory techniques.

1 Multiple-Bore-Hole System for Dynamic Dewatering of open cast Brown Coal Mine Adamów, Poland 1956. Worldwideinnovatory system with implementation for large-scale safe mining- COAL extracting operations. This system replacedconventional dewatering (i.e. shaft-tunneling system) from which dozens of miners were killed every year from collapsing andquicksand flooding of mining tunnels.

2 Multiple-Bore-Hole System for Dynamic Dewatering of open cast Brown Coal Mine Pątnów, Poland 1957. Improved system to (1).

3 Multiple-Bore-Hole System for Dynamic Dewatering of open cast Brown Coal Mine Turów, Poland 1957. Similar system to (2).

4 Multiple-Bore-Hole System for Dynamic Dewatering of open cast Brown Coal Mine Bełchatów, Poland 1976. Similar system to (2).This system was introduced to Bełchatów mine, despite of Dr. Zakiewicz’s protests and his proposal to protect this huge hole,with an intra-formation solid wall made through the use of rows of multiple bore-hole’s explosives barrier infiltration of groundwater to the mine. NOTE: A similar Multiple-Bore-Hole System for Dynamic Dewatering for several Brown Coal mines was copiedand implemented in Germany, Russia, and Ukraine.

5 Multiple Bore-Hole Explosive Barriering System made for Bore-Hole Sulphur Mine Mishraq in Northern Iraq (Mosul) to thedepth of 100 m, for confinement of dramatic outflow of 60% out of total production hot water from sulphur deposit to Tigris River.


ANNEX: A-2 – 1/6

6 Multiple-Bore-Hole System for Dynamic Dewatering of open cast Sulphur Mine Piaseczno. Poland, 1957. Worldwide innovatorysystem with implementation to the large scale safe mining- sulphur extracting operations. The said system was replacingconventional life threatening dewatering system for the water, which was contaminated and emitting to the atmosphere of deadlyconcentration of hydrogen sulphide.

7 Multiple-Bore-Hole System for Dynamic Dewatering of open cast Sulphur Mine Machów. Poland, 1960. Improved system to (7).First in the World anti-filtration barrier impervious wall, to prevent open cast cave from flooding with Vistula river water.

8 Drilling-Milling Method of construction 6 km long intra-formation watertight barrier build for Sulpur opencast Mine in Machów,for protection against thread of deluge, which was expected from Vistula River, neighboring with open cast mine.

9 Bore-Hole Mining System for Hydro-Thermo-Dynamic extraction of crystalline Sulphur from non-confined deep deposits Grzybów.Poland, 1966. Worldwide innovatory system with unprecedented high recoverability factor, exceeding 75%, versus conventional30%. The said system was replacing danger and ineffective open cast mining and introducing a substantial energy savings.

10 Bore-Hole Mining System for Hydro-Thermo-Dynamic extraction of crystalline Sulphur from non-confined deep deposits Jeziórko I.Poland, 1967. Similar system to (8).

11 Bore-Hole Mining System for Hydro-Thermo-Dynamic extraction of crystalline Sulphur from non-confined deep deposits Jeziórko II.Poland, 1968. Similar system to (8).

12 Bore-Hole Mining System for Hydro-Thermo-Dynamic extraction of crystalline Sulphur from non-confined deep deposits Jeziórko III.Poland, 1967. Similar system to (8). Note: The above (6 to 11) items were producing 5,000,000 metric tons of sulphur per year.The similar system was copied from Polish operations and implemented in Russia-Ukraine.


ANNEX: A-2 – 2/6REFERENCES: Complex Projects Prof. Bohdan Zakiewicz, Phd

13 Bore-Hole Mining System for Hydro-Dynamic frontal extraction of crystalline Salts from bedded type deposits Siedlec/Bochnia.Poland, 1965. Worldwide innovatory system with unprecedented high recoverability factor, exceeding 75%, versus conventional30%. The said system was replacing danger and ineffective underground conventional, mostly hand made mining and introducinga substantial increase of productivity, exemplified with 100 folds output per capita.

14 Bore-Hole Mining System for Hydro-Dynamic frontal extraction of crystalline Salts from boulder type deposits Wieliczka.Poland, 1965. Worldwide innovatory system with extraction of Boulders without miners in the cavities. The said system wasreplacing danger and ineffective underground conventional, mostly hand made mining and introducing a substantial increaseof productivity, exemplified with 100 fold output per capita.

15 Bore-Hole Mining System for Hydro-Dynamic extraction of crystalline Salts from diaper type deposits Góra/Inowrocław.Poland, 1968. Vertical Multi-Chamber leaching of salt under strict submarine’s hydro-echo-sond control of the shape of theindividual chambers. Worldwide innovatory system of developing storage chamber with unprecedented high speed of cavitycreation for depleted uranium and/or hydrocarbons in salt matrix, without any roof supporting system.

16 Bore-Hole Mining System for Hydro-Dynamic extraction of Phosphate Concretes from loose sandy-clayey formation Burzenin/Łódź. Poland, 1966. Horizontal Multi-Chamber extraction with adjustable jet cannons under strict submarine’s hydro-echo-sond controlof the shape of cavity. Worldwide innovatory system of developing cavity in loose formation without any roof supporting systemand by the same to perform sub-surface mining without any open cast.

17 Bore-Hole Mining System for deposit Jaltipan. Mexico, 1971. Hydro-Thermo-Dynamic extraction of crystalline sulphur, wasreactivated of the terminated mine and doubled original output up to 1,000,000 tons per year, by hydraulically plugging ofun-confined production fields. Worldwide innovatory system with improved high recoverability factor, exceeding 80%, versusconventional 30%. First in the world recycling hot water system, which brought substantial energy savings and restore profitableproduction.



18 Bore-Hole Mining System for Hydro-Thermo-Dynamic extraction of crystalline sulphur, which was reactivated on terminatedmine and deposit Texistipec. Mexico, 1971. Similar system to (13).

19 Bore-Hole Mining System for Hydro-Thermo-Dynamic improved extraction of crystalline Sulphur, with output of 1,000,000 tonsper year, from artificially confined very difficult, 250 m deep deposit Mishaq. Iraq, 1969. Worldwide innovatory system withimproved high recoverability factor, exceeding 85%, versus conventional 30%. First in the World Multi-Bore-Hole anti-leakageinfrastructure torpedo barrier to the depth of 100 m, to stop losses of production hot water into Tigris River.

20 Bore-Hole Mining System for deposit Rustler Spring. Texas, USA, 1978. By introducing Hydro-Thermo-Dynamic recycling ofproduction water for extraction of crystalline Sulphur, the abandoned production was restored for another 20 years with outputof 2,000,000 tons per year. Worldwide innovatory system with improved high recoverability factor, exceeding 85%, versusconventional 30%.

21 Bore-Hole Mining System for deposit Chacahoula. Luisiana, USA, 1979. Hydro-Thermo-Dynamic recycling of production waterfor extraction of crystalline Sulphur, with restored output of 500,000 tons per year. Worldwide innovatory system ofSuper Daisy Shaft with lateral small diameter Jet Stinger’s wells, with explosive fracturing of the formation for highrecoverability factor, exceeding 85%, versus conventional 30%. First in the World deep SDS (750 m) with diameter of 15 feet.

22 Bore-Hole Mining System for deposit Hoskins Mound. Texas, USA, 1980. By introducing innovatory modifiedHydro-Thermo-Dynamic recycling of production water for extraction of crystalline Sulphur, with output of 500,000 tons per year.Worldwide innovatory system of Super Daisy Shaft with lateral small diameter Jet Stinger’s wells, with explosive fracturing of theformation for high recoverability factor, exceeding 85%, versus conventional 30%. Depth of deposit: 450 m.



23 Bore-Hole “Drill and Dredge” Mining System for Rotokaua. New Zealand 1982. Underground Leaching of Sulphur from deposit,occurring from under bottom of lake. Innovatory system for mining under lake from barges, with no damages to the water.Post-extraction chambers have diameter of 40 m.

24 Bore-Hole Mining System for Underground Gasification of Sulphur to SO2 from deposit Ain Sifn, depth: 900m.Shantung Province, China, 1986. Underground melting of crystalline Sulphur in this difficult deposit was inefficient, and the onlysolution was innovatory system of processing sulphur in the deposit, with gas output substituting 1,000,000 tons per year.The SO2 gas has been designated for catalytic conversion into SO3 and subsequent H2SO4. Note: Until recent days, the worldwideSulphur production reaches 190,000,000 tons, which were recovered with use of Bohdan Zakiewicz’s Bore-Hole mining methods.

25 Multiple Bore-Hole system for UNCOMCOAL underground gasification of bituminous coal for Mars mine/deposit, Silesia.Poland, 1962. First in Europe Demonstration Plant for underground successful coal gasification, which was followed by anothersimilar projects for bituminous and brown coal in Poland and other countries.

26 Multiple Bore-Hole system for UNCOMCOAL underground gasification of brown coal for Březno mine/deposit.Czechoslowakia, 1962. Second in Europe Demonstration Plant for underground successful coal gasification, which was followedby another similar projects.

27 Multiple Bore-Hole SDS system for CEEC underground gasification of brown coal deposit, Glendale. Texas, USA 1979. First in USADemonstration Project for underground coal gasification with unprecedented capacity of 5,000,000 cum per day.

28 Multiple Bore-Hole SDS-THERMOFLUID system for underground fluidization and unlocking of heavy and ultra heavy crude oilreserves and on field upgrading from 60 API to 300 API by thermo-cracking gasification and spontaneous hydrogenation of crude.First in USA Projects: Oxnard, Belridge and San Ardo in California, with initial capacity of 3,000 barrels of light crude per day each.



29Multiple Bore-Hole SDS-THERMOFLUID system for underground fluidization and unlocking of ultra light,410 API–420 API gravity oil huge reserves which are entrapped in chalk formation. Initial capacity of such mine is 30,000 barrelsper day. First Project in USA: the location is confidential.

30 Five innovation pending projects, restricted for publication by investors (see project in motion).



• Prof. Dipl. Eng. Janusz Badur and Team, Institute of Flow Machinery, Polish Academy of Science. Thermodynamics and specialisticconstruction of turbo-generators for technology CEEG.

• Prof. Dr. Zygmunt Brogowski and Team, Agricultural University in Warsaw. Utilization of Humine Acid extracted with Mining Technology CEEB, “Biogenium Suprematio”.

• Prof. Dipl. Eng. Ryszard Kozłowski and Team, Technical University of Cracov. Metalurgy of operation piping for the extraction of the high temperature Geo-plutonic energy..

• Prof. Dipl. Eng. Jerzy Lis and Team, Vice-Rector of AGH University of Science and Technology in Cracov. Ceramic and Micro ceramic for technology installation in CEEC process. Technology of high temperature.

• Prof. Dipl. Eng. Mirosław Miller, Technical University in Wrocław. High temperature chemical processes, high temperature mass spectrometry (KEMS), nanomaterials and metalurgy.

• Dr. Eng. Piotr D. Moncarz with Team, Stanford University, Civil &Environmental Engineering. Engineering Economy for Geo-plutonic energy worldwide.

• Prof. Dipl. Eng. Piotr Noakowski, Technical University of Dortmund. Specialist Isolations for Geo-plutonic thermodynamic operations.• Prof. Dr. hab. Mariusz-Orion Jędrysek with Team, Wrocław University, Institute Geological Sciences Isotope Geology and Geo ecology,

Applied Geology &Geochemistry.• Prof. Dipl. Eng. Jan Palarski with Team, Silesian Technical University. Back-filling, cementing in mining and drilling.• Dipl. Eng. Andrzej Siemaszko and Team, Polish Academy of Science. Manager of organization scientific teams and cooperation with UE in a

field of donations (grants)for research and development.• Dr. Eng. Jan Stawczyk and Team, Technical University of Łódzka. Precise calculations and simulation of thermodynamic processes with use of

48 core computer. The works for the technologies CEEC and CEEG.• Prof. Dipl. Eng. Andrzej Szczepański and Team, AGH University of Science and Technology in Cracov. Management of the underground water

regimes. Applicable hydro geologic science.


ANNEX: A-3 – 1/2REFERENCES: Team of specialists VISTON United Swiss AG/NOX Holding AG

• Prof. Dipl. Eng. Mirosław Wendeker and Team, Technical University of Lublin. Generators and motors operated with synthesis gas.• Prof. Anton Stasch, executive headmaster of the European Academy for Technology and Management (EATM)• Prof. Felix Hovsepian, Doctor of technical science, professor of mathematics at the University of Moscow, second executive of the council• Prof. Longin Pastusiak, politic scientist and former president of the Polish Senate• Prof. Wojciech Lamentowicz, headmaster of the College of Economic and Political Connections• Prof. Marek Cieciura, University of Information Technology in Warsaw• Prof. Elżbieta Mączyńska, president of the polish economic community• Prof. Volker Steinhübel, Executive director IFC Institute for Controlling in Nürtingen/Germany• Prof. Konstantin Theile, president of the Educatis School of Management und ehemaliger and formal marketing director of the Swiss

concern Swatch• Prof. Bohdan Hud, director if the institute for European integration, university of Lvov.


ANNEX: A-3 – 2/2REFERENCES: Team of specialists VISTON United Swiss AG/NOX Holding AG

REFERENCES: Projects Cooperation partners of NOX Holding AG Petschow + Thiel – Projectmanagement / Mathes – Beratende Ingenieur

1 Heizkraftwerk Nord II – Projekt C 40 – Stadtwerke Chemnitz

Bauherr: Stadtwerke Chemnitz AGTermine: Baubeginn 2007 / Bauende 2009Projektdaten: Elektrischer Turbosatz 100 MW, Kesselleistung 360 t/hLeistungen: ProjektcontrollingBeschreibung: Erhöhung Effizienz Energieerzeugung; Ersatz bestehender Gegendruckturbine durch

100-MW-Entnahme-Kondensationsturbine; Umbau Dampferzeuger B und C;Umsetzung Automatisierungskonzept (Blockautomatisierung inkl. An- und Abfahrtsprozesse)

2 Gas- und Dampfturbinenkraftwerk Herdecke (GUD-Anlage)Bauherr: Kraftwerksgesellschaft Herdecke GmbH & Co. KGGeneralübernehmer: Siemens Power Generation (Erlangen)Gesamtbaukosten: 220 Mio. EUR bruttoTermine: Baubeginn 2005 / Ausführungsplanung 2006 / / Inbetriebnahme 2007Leistungen: statische Bemessung Gebäudehülle Gebäude UMA, UMB, UGDBeschreibung: Gas- und Dampfturbinenwerk ist auf Basis von Erdgas für eine Leistung von 400 MW und

2,4 Mrd. Kilowattstunden/a ausgelegt


ANNEX: B-1 – 1/3


3 Gas- und Dampfturbinenkraftwerk Hamm-Uentrop (GUD-Anlage)

Bauherr: Trianel Power Kraftwerk Hamm-Uentrop GmbH & Co. KGGeneralübernehmer: Siemens Power Generation (Erlangen)Gesamtbaukosten: 440 Mio. EUR bruttoTermine: Baubeginn 2005 / Ausführungsplanung 2006 / Inbetriebnahme 2007Leistungen: statische Bemessung Gebäudehülle Gebäude UMA, UMB, UGDBeschreibung: Gas- und Dampfturbinenwerk ist auf Basis von Erdgas für eine Leistung von 800 MW

und 4,8 Mrd. Kilowattstunden/a ausgelegt.

4 Medupi Power Station, Südafrika – Neubau eines 4800 MW Kohlekraftwerkes mit 6 Blöcken

Bauherr: ESKOM, Sandton, SüdafrikaGesamtbaukosten: 6,2 Mrd. EUR bruttoTermine: Bauzeit 11/2008 bis 08/2011 1. Block; Gesamtprojekt 2016Projektdaten: Elektrischer Turbosatz 100 MW, Kesselleistung 360 t/hLeistungszeitraum: 09/2006 bis 12/2010Leistungen:Schnittstelle / technische Klärung zwischen Planern und dem ESKOM Audit Team; Überwachung Planlieferungen; Prüfung Planungbezüglich geforderter Spezifikation, Kosteneffizienz, Sicherheitskonzept; Sicherstellung der Optimierung hinsichtlich Installationen,Betrieb und Unterhaltung; Überprüfung Material- und Konstruktionsdetails und regional angepasster Bauabläufe


ANNEX: B-1 – 2/3


5 Neubau einer Biogasanlage, Südkorea, Soul (Free Economic Zones)

Bauherr: Ministerium für UmweltProjektdurchführung: Fa. Saemangeum-Gunsan, Dr. Ing. Kyong-Hee ChoiTermine: Baubeginn 2007 / Bauende 2009Leistungen: Vorkalkulation, Wirtschaftlichkeitsberechnung

6 Flughafen Frankfurt/Main, Neubau Terminal 3, Technisch-Wirtschaftliches Controlling

Bauherr: Fraport AGPlaner/Architekt: Objektplanung: Prof. Ch. Mäckler

Fachplanung: Drees & SommerBaukosten: 520 Mio. EURTermine: Baubeginn 2013 / Bauende 2016Leistungen: Technisch Wirtschaftliches Controlling


ANNEX: B-1 – 3/3

Documents

technology innovation NOX Holding - Umba.am · NOX HOLDING AG * H.Ollendiek [email protected] 11. o Drill iameterd SDS 75 cm bis 150 cm o Drill iameter Jetd -Stinger 24,13