Upload
rell26
View
207
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Final presentattion for Senior thesis
Citation preview
Terrell Wesley
Implementing Audience Response Systems: An Efficient Means to
Collect Data and Engage Constituencies
Foreword
Hurricane Sandy and 2012 ElectionsData Feedback
ARS as the best way Technological advancements Accessibility
Potential future uses
Audience Response Systems
• Clickers • Classroom Response
Systems • Student Response
systems • Multimedia Response
Technology
How does this technology work
Introduction
Validate the uses of ARS classroom Multiple platforms
Advancements in the technology Location Devices
Possible consideration for universal use. Internship at Turning Technologies
ARS: The Most Efficient Way to Increase Student Performance and Engagement Medina, Medina, Wanzer, Wilson, Er and Britton (2010)
Efficiency in the classroom Non graded material proved better acceptance.
Anxiety Most beneficial or efficient means to receive responses in the
classroom
Other Classroom Uses
Ioannou and Artino (2010)
Used ARS in different types of class settings
Reinforce lectures
Baytiyeh and Naja (2010)
Validation
Quantitative and qualitative analysis•
ARS:Implementation Yu and Smith (2008)
Supports multi-dimensional classroom: Implementation:
Four VariablesEngagement:
Six Variables
Implementation Cont:
Zapf and Garcia (2011) Technologically proficiency
Engagement and performance Clicker classes vs not clicker classes
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Variety of reports Previous knowledge
Found no evidence of dissatisfaction
ARS Increases Engagement in All Platforms
Keske and Smutko (2010) Used on small community
ARS provided immediate data vs. other methods Limitations: larger communities will require:
Smaller number of questions Distribution of clickers
Other Uses
Osterman (2007) Library
Generate conversation Guide lecture
Participants are more engaged Better knowledge of audience
(Anderson, 2011) Impact ARS had on adults Evaluative analysis of previous research ARS has positive effect on adult learners.
Companies Maximize Interest by Advancing Application Integrations
Stav, Nielsen, Hansen-Nygaard and Thorseth (2010) Technology integrations
Mass array of users Increase accessibility
Increased in overall reaction Tablets, smart phones, laptops and PC
Things to consider in universal integration
(Masikunis, Panayiotidis, & Burke, 2009). Role of the lecturer Presenter logs Methods should be individually based
Suggestion of further research No definite strategy Must determine a strategy
Synthesis
Efficient: Anderson (2011) Yu and Smith (2008), Medina et al (2010) Classroom Outside of classroom
Effective: Osterman(2007), Zapf and Garcia (2011) immediate data collection
Accessibility: Stav et al. (2010), Medina et al. (2010), Baytiyeh and Naja (2010),
Conclusion
Increases engagement Privilege to poll from any location simultaneously Any internet connected device Increased accessibility
Final Note:
Uses Across all age groups. Comfort Likelihood Opportunity for Implementation
Research question: ARS is the most efficient means to gain responses from any constituency in any location. Can we integrate this into our electoral process?