THE COLLEGE READY PROMISE

The Running Record & Global Scholar: Evaluate

Shared Norms

• Participants will• Keep an open mind and be solution oriented• Actively engage in discussion• Assume the best of colleagues• Work collaboratively with the interest of sharing and

creating best signature practices

Global Scholar

Objectives 1• Teachers will learn about the changes in the evaluation

scoring system• Teachers will review the decision making process

(Teacher Advisory Panel, Leadership Team, Management)• Teachers will practice using the Running Record• Teachers will review a sample of the Running Record

The Global Scholar-Evaluate System• 2011-2012

• No option for differentiated observations that could impact final scores• S2 scores overwrote all S1 scores

• 2012-2013• Teachers will be observed informally

• One indicator will be school wide• 3 indicators will be selected by teacher and coach/observer and will be observed

twice per semester informally and once per semester formally.

• Evidence will be scored on a running record• Scores can increase or decrease scores by .5• Teacher receives differentiated support and feedback on the most high

need areas (additional opportunities for collaboration and conferences with observers)

• The remaining indicators will be governed by the same rules (S2 overwrites S1).

What’s New? The Running Record

38 Indicators, 4 levels of

performance

Framework for Effective Teaching6

Domain 1 Data-Driven Planning and Preparation

Standard 1.1 Establish standards-based learning objectives for instructional plans

IndicatorsA) Selection of objectivesB) Measurability of objectives

4 Domains

17 Standards

7

Multiple Measures of Teacher Effectiveness

Observation of Teacher Practice;

40%

Parent and Family Feedback; 10%

Student Feedback ; 10%

Individual Teacher SGP; 30%

School-Wide Subject SGP; 10%

Observation of Teacher Practice; 50%

Parent and Family Feedback; 10%

Stu-dent Feed

back ; 10%

School-Wide ELA SGP; 25%

School-Wide Math SGP; 5%

CST-Tested Subjects Non-CST-Tested Subjects

A Design To Increase the Opportunities for Support: The Running Record• Each score in the running record can impact the overall rating• Unannounced and Formal observations can increase or decrease

scores by 0.5• Formal observation not part of the running record: S2 overwrites S1.• Review the sample below of one differentiated observation and one

formal observation.

Standards IndicatorsObservation Date

Mid Year

Final

ScoringObserver Name Admin1 Admin1 Admin1 Admin1 Admin1 Admin1

Observation Type UN F UN UN UN F

3.3 Implementation of instructional strategies

A) QuestioningObservation Rating 1 2 1 3 2 3

Overall Rating

B) Academic discourseObservation Rating

Overall Rating

C) Group structuresObservation Rating 2 3

Overall Rating 2 3

D) Resources and instructional materials

Observation Rating

Overall Rating

Sample Running Record

11

Overall Teacher Effectiveness Determination

CST-Tested Teachers Non-CST Tested Teachers

30% Teacher SGP 25% School-Wide ELA SGP

10% School-Wide SGP for Subject

5% School-Wide Math SGP

40% Average of Teacher Effectiveness Ratings

50% Average of Teacher Effectiveness Ratings

10% Student Survey 10% Student Survey

10% School-Wide Parent Survey

10% School-Wide Parent Survey

12

Teacher Effectiveness Levels

Effectiveness Level Performance Band

Highly Effective 3.6-4.0

Effective 3.0-3.59

Achieving 2.5-2.9

Emerging 2.0-2.49

Entry <2.0

Getting Startedhttps://tcrp.globalscholar.com

What’s new? Informal (diff) Observations• On the agenda screen. Click “informal observation”

Generating a report

• Provides running record data for your conferences and coaching

• Select reports, year, school, and teacher• Be sure to save the pdf version to view all indicators

Sample teacher report

Selecting teachers

Use the search box or browse the teacher list to select the teacher being observed, click on the corresponding name, and it will prompt you to choose an evaluation section as shown

below.

Professional Growth Plan

To provide support to teachers by focusing on specific professional skills and goals known as focus areas.

Currently exists as an uploaded document that should be viewed by observers prior to the pre conference.

Formal Observation

Lesson Plan Submission

• Teachers will upload their Lesson Plans, which will need to be approved by the Evaluators

Lesson Plan Submission• Once submitted and approved, the Observer can go in to download and view the Lesson

Plan• Teachers should self score with the submission of their lesson plan, before delivery of the

lesson

Steps 2-4Lesson Plan Review, Pre-Observation Conference and Classroom Observation: Scoring and notes

Narrative/Quick note input

Domains and indicators

Self scoring:teachers complete by stage 6observers view by stage 8

Click on the Indicator

Teachers will click on the level in which they think they should be scored

Teachers can validate their scoring with notes and evidence

Reflection submission• Teachers will need to submit their Reflection Evidence prior to the Post Observation

Conference

Observer Preliminary Scoring

• Observers score teachers and add in notes on all 38 indicators

Post-observation and Informal Observation Conference

• View evidence, notes, and scores for each indicator

Let’s take a look at a sample

Now log on