15
The “Compromise” of 1850

The “Compromise” of 1850. Indian Territory Louisiana Territory

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The “Compromise” of 1850. Indian Territory Louisiana Territory

The “Compromise” of 1850

Page 2: The “Compromise” of 1850. Indian Territory Louisiana Territory

MISSOURI COMPROMISE (1820)

Indian Territory

Louisiana Territory

Page 3: The “Compromise” of 1850. Indian Territory Louisiana Territory

RESULTS OF THE MISSOURI COMPROMISE (1820)

1. Missouri would join the United States as a slave state.

2. Maine would join the United States as a free state.

3. An imaginary line at latitude 36° 30’ would be drawn across the territory gained in the Louisiana Purchase. North of the line slavery was banned—except for Missouri.

Page 5: The “Compromise” of 1850. Indian Territory Louisiana Territory

FREE SOIL PARTY

Page 6: The “Compromise” of 1850. Indian Territory Louisiana Territory

CAN YOU SOLVE THE PROBLEM AND AVOID A CIVIL WAR?

The North does not want slavery in the new territories.

The South wants slavery in the new territories.

What should the United States do about new territories that apply for statehood?

Page 7: The “Compromise” of 1850. Indian Territory Louisiana Territory

The Missouri Compromise was only a temporary solution. The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo granted the United States much more land than before.So what to do with

all of this land????

Page 8: The “Compromise” of 1850. Indian Territory Louisiana Territory

John C. Calhoun Henry Clay Daniel Webster

There were 3 important senators who influenced the outcome of the Compromise of 1850

THE SOUTH, ER, UNION IS IN DANGER!!!

I WANT TO SEEK THE MIDDLE GROUND!

I AM AN AMERICAN!

Page 9: The “Compromise” of 1850. Indian Territory Louisiana Territory

I wish to speak today, not as a Massachusetts man, nor as a Northern man, but as an American… HEAR ME FOR MY CAUSE!”

Page 10: The “Compromise” of 1850. Indian Territory Louisiana Territory

1. Congress would admit California as a free state

2. The people of the territories of New Mexico and Utah would decide for themselves whether slavery would be legal

3. Congress would abolish the sale of enslaved people in Washington, D.C.

4. Slavery itself would remain legal in Washington, D.C.

5. The Fugitive Slave Act would order all citizens of the United States to assist in the return of enslaved people who had escaped from their owners. It would also deny a jury trial to escaped slaves.

THE COMPROMISE OF 1850

Page 11: The “Compromise” of 1850. Indian Territory Louisiana Territory

What was unique about California? Why did it pose such a dilemma?

1. Congress would admit California as a free state

Page 12: The “Compromise” of 1850. Indian Territory Louisiana Territory

2. The people of the territories of New Mexico and Utah would decide for themselves whether slavery would be legal

Popular sovereignty, let the people decide

Page 13: The “Compromise” of 1850. Indian Territory Louisiana Territory

“I have, Senators, believed from the first that.. The subject of slavery would, if not prevented by some timely and effective measure, end in disunion [of the United States]… It has reached a point when it can no longer be disguised or denied that the Union is in danger. You have thus had forced upon you the greatest and gravest question that can ever come under your consideration: How can the Union be preserved?” -Calhoun

Page 14: The “Compromise” of 1850. Indian Territory Louisiana Territory

SLAVERY PERSPECTIVES Then:

Many Americans believed that stopping slavery was morally wrong, because it interfered with their liberty to own enslaved people as property. Government they believed, should protect this basic liberty.

Now:

Now, Americans oppose slavery because they view it as morally wrong to own another human being as property.

Page 15: The “Compromise” of 1850. Indian Territory Louisiana Territory

0

2,000,000

4,000,000

6,000,000

8,000,000

10,000,000

12,000,000

14,000,000

16,000,000

18,000,000

20,000,000

1800 1810 1820 1830 1840 1850

Rural

Urban