9
The Effect of Carbohydrate Production by the Diatom Nitzschia curvilineata on the Erodibility of Sediment Author(s): T. F. Sutherland, J. Grant and C. L. Amos Source: Limnology and Oceanography, Vol. 43, No. 1 (Jan., 1998), pp. 65-72 Published by: American Society of Limnology and Oceanography Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2838940 . Accessed: 13/06/2014 17:02 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. . American Society of Limnology and Oceanography is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Limnology and Oceanography. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 188.72.127.119 on Fri, 13 Jun 2014 17:02:23 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

The Effect of Carbohydrate Production by the Diatom Nitzschia curvilineata on the Erodibility of Sediment

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Effect of Carbohydrate Production by the Diatom Nitzschia curvilineata on the Erodibility of Sediment

The Effect of Carbohydrate Production by the Diatom Nitzschia curvilineata on theErodibility of SedimentAuthor(s): T. F. Sutherland, J. Grant and C. L. AmosSource: Limnology and Oceanography, Vol. 43, No. 1 (Jan., 1998), pp. 65-72Published by: American Society of Limnology and OceanographyStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2838940 .

Accessed: 13/06/2014 17:02

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

.

American Society of Limnology and Oceanography is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve andextend access to Limnology and Oceanography.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 188.72.127.119 on Fri, 13 Jun 2014 17:02:23 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 2: The Effect of Carbohydrate Production by the Diatom Nitzschia curvilineata on the Erodibility of Sediment

Limnol Oceanogr, 43(1), 1998, 65-72 C? 1998, by the Amencan Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Inc

The effect of carbohydrate production by the diatom Nitzschia curvilineata on the erodibility of sediment

T. F. Sutherland and J. Grant Department of Oceanography, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4J1

C. L. Amos Geological Survey of Canada-Atlantic, Bedford Institute of Oceanography, P.O. Box 1006, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B2Y 4A2

Abstract The effect of growth and carbohydrate production by the diatom Nitzschia curvilineata on sediment erodibility

was explored in laboratory flume experiments. Diatom cultures, incubated on sediment, were monitored daily for chlorophyll and carbohydrate concentrations and eroded in a recirculating flume at successive stages of growth. Because variations in erosion rate were far greater than variations in erosion threshold during the diatom growth period, erosion rate may be a more sensitive index of sediment stability. Erosion rate was negatively correlated with sediment chlorophyll (r2 = 0.759; P = 0.024) and bulk carbohydrate (r2 = 0.958; P = 0.001) concentrations. A strong negative correlation was found between the sediment bulk carbohydrate-to-chlorophyll ratio and erosion rate (r2 = 0.996; P < 0.001), suggesting that this ratio would serve as a good indicator of sediment erodibility. The size of eroding particles or aggregates increased with the age of the biofilm, probably due to the pervasion of sediment with mucilage and changes in "stickiness" of the resulting sediment microfabric. Sediment stability increased throughout the stationary phase of growth regardless of lift forces produced by trapped bubbles within the biofilm and progressively smaller increases in sediment carbohydrate concentrations during this period. Knowl- edge of the physiological status of diatom biofilms is essential for the quantitative prediction of sediment transport, since diatom growth phase alters the behavior of sediment erosion.

The extent to which benthic diatom biofilms significantly alter the stability of sediments depends on the interaction of many physical, chemical, and biological factors (Paterson 1988). However, the production of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) by diatoms for locomotion (Edgar and Pickett-Heaps, 1984) appears to be a first-order binding mechanism of biological origin that influences the stabili- zation of sediment. Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) have verified this observation showing mucilage bridges be- tween diatoms, sediment grains, and associated particles (Grant et al. 1986; Paterson 1994). The formation of diatom biofilms and the associated changes in microfabric of sedi- ment will have a strong impact on many aspects of sedi- mentology and benthic ecology (Westall and Rince 1994).

The measurement of carbohydrate concentration has been suggested to be a direct assay of EPS (Underwood et al. 1995) and, therefore, a more sensitive indicator or predictive tool of biomediated sediment binding (Grant and Gust 1987). The production and composition ("stickiness") of carbohy- drates depends on several factors including nutrient status and growth phase (Decho 1990). The objective of this paper is to determine the effect of carbohydrate production by the benthic diatom Nitzschia curvilineata on the erodibility of permanently submerged sediments. Sediment carbohydrate

Acknowledgments We thank Brian Schofield and Paul MacPherson for building the

core inserts for the flume and Curtis Roegner for assisting in the erosion experiments. A Hi-8 tape recorder and Optimus software package was provided by Ron O'Dor and Danny Jackson. Financial support for this study was provided by an NSERC PG4, a Dalhousie Graduate Fellowship, and an NSERC operating grant to Jon Grant.

content was monitored during exponential and stationary (nutrient-stressed) growth phases and sediment erodibility was measured in a flume for a given set of hydrodynamic conditions.

The depletion of pore-water nutrients within a stratified oxidized biofilm microzone can potentially lead to enhanced mucopolysaccharide production in sediment, since carbo- hydrate production can be stimulated during nutrient star- vation (Myklestad et al. 1972). Nutrient limitation of micro- phytobenthos in surficial sediment is often not considered, because the sediment pore water is conventionally thought to be a "soup" of nutrients. However, field studies have shown that nutrient loading stimulates microphytobenthos growth (Sundback and Graneli 1988; Sundback and Jonsson 1988), and that nitrogen appears to be the limiting nutrient (Flothmann and Werner 1992). Nitrogen may become quick- ly depleted in the oxidized microzone of the highly concen- trated producing layer through the uptake of nitrogen by di- atoms (Sundback 1994). Microsensor studies have revealed steep concentration gradients of oxygen (Revsbech et al. 1983; Carlton and Wetzel 1988; Jonsson et al. 1994; Yallop et al. 1994) in the illuminated topmost millimeters of the sediment where diatoms (Paterson 1986) and cyanobacteria (Jorgensen et al. 1983) concentrate. These gradients are con- sistent with active growth and the potential for localized nu- trient depletion.

The pervasion of EPS into interstitial voids may reduce diffusion rates of pore-water nutrients (Jorgensen 1994) and contribute to the maintenance of steep nutrient gradients in the sediment column. Furthermore, biofilms containing trapped bubbles, similar to that described later in this study

65

This content downloaded from 188.72.127.119 on Fri, 13 Jun 2014 17:02:23 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 3: The Effect of Carbohydrate Production by the Diatom Nitzschia curvilineata on the Erodibility of Sediment

66 Sutherland et al.

and to previously described "bubble" and "blister" mats, may inhibit diel fluctuations in oxic and anoxic conditions and, therefore, affect nitrification and denitrification pro- cesses in the sediment (Wiltshire 1992). In Texel sediments, oxygenated conditions extended down to a depth of 4 mm in a "bubble" mat, while anoxic conditions were found at a depth of 2.5 mm in a nonbubble mat (Yallop et al. 1994). Carlton and Wetzel (1988) showed that epipelic algal pho- tosynthesis, or the magnitude of sediment oxygenation, was inversely correlated with the phosphate efflux rate from lake sediments. The associated production of carbohydrates in re- sponse to the nutrient-depleted conditions may slow down the diffusion of ions and contribute to the conservation of nutrients in sediment (Decho 1994). Primary production in the overlying water may be affected by the formation of bubble mats if nutrients become conserved within the sedi- ment.

One important implication for the resuspension of biofilm constituents, such as EPS concerns their potential as a food source for benthic animals (Decho and Moriarty 1990). An exopolymer matrix is a highly labile source of carbon and exhibits highly adsorptive qualities that allow it to sequester dissolved organic matter (Decho and Lopez 1993). The flux of this material to the overlying water column can serve as a measure of food availability, an important parameter not often considered in the development of carrying capacity models for shellfish aquaculture in coastal embayments (Dowd 1991). The concentration of chlorophyll and bulk carbohydrate available to suspension-feeding bivalves will depend on the ability of a suspension feeder to sort and select for the highly concentrated biofilm particles or aggre- gates.

Methods

The incubation of Nitzschia curvilineata on sediment-A nonaxenic culture of the diatom, N. curvilineata, was ob- tained from the Provasoli-Guillard Centre for Culture of Ma- rine Phytoplankton (CCMP555). Stock cultures were main- tained in F/2 medium (Guillard 1972) in 50-ml pyrex screw cap culture tubes at 18?C and on a 16: 8 h light: dark cycle illuminated by Cool White lamps at 124 quanta m-2 s-', as measured with a quantum scalar irradiance meter from QSL 100 Biospherical Instrument, Inc. To avoid contamination, all glassware used for culturing purposes was soaked in a 10% HCI bath for 24 h, rinsed seven times in superQ water, and then autoclaved for 20 min at 20 psi.

Sediment cores (inner diameter, 11.4 cm) for stabilization measurements were prepared with 200 ml of Celatom diat- omite (white in color), mixed with 200 ml of 0.45-,tum filtered seawater and placed in a core barrel designed to be inserted into a recirculating flume. The grain size of the diatomite was approximately 20 ,tum in diameter. A description of the flume is presented in the following section. The sediment-laden core barrels (19 replicates) were kept on a sea table containing a flow-through seawater bath of 15?C. To prevent mixing of the seawater bath with culture media, the tops of the core barrels were set above the surface level of the water bath. The sed- iment cores were incubated on a 16:8 h light: dark cycle, illuminated by Cool White lamps at 89 quanta m-2 s-'.

In order to obtain a horizontally uniform distribution of N. curvilineata on the sediment cores, the experimental cul- ture was grown from an inoculum that contained no visible aggregates of diatom cells. Two hundred milliliters of the experimental culture was placed in each of 17 sediment lad- en core barrels during the exponential phase of growth. Four- teen of these diatom-sediment cores were reserved for ero- sion trials, while the remaining three cores were reserved for a time-series record of chlorophyll concentration and car- bohydrate concentration. Each day, two pasteur pipettes were used to collect a core from each of the three stock diatom- sediment cores. The wide-diameter end of the pipette was used to core the sediment. One pipette core was analyzed for chlorophyll, while the other was analyzed for carbohy- drates. Two hundred milliliters of 0.45-,tm filtered seawater were placed in each of two sediment-laden core barrels. One of these cores served as a control for the erosion trials, while the other core was subsampled daily for chlorophyll, in order to determine the potential for aerial contamination through- out the incubation period.

Chlorophyll analysis was performed by placing each core sample into 10 ml of 90% acetone: water solution. The sam- ples were extracted for 24 h in a cold/dark refrigerator (5?C), and the fluorescence was measured using a Turner Designs model 10' fluorometer. Two drops of 10% HCI were added to each sample, and the fluorescence was measured again. The fluorescence readings were converted to chlorophyll fol- lowing the methods of Parsons et al. (1984). A phenol-sul- furic acid assay (Dubois et al. 1956) modified for sediments (Lui et al. 1973) was used to determine carbohydrate con- centrations. The extraction process was modified for analysis of carbohydrates in marine sediments by using a 30-ppt sa- line solution, instead of distilled water (Underwood et al. 1995). After an extraction period of 1 h, the sediment sam- ples were centrifuged at 2,000 rpm for 10 min to separate the sample into colloidal and bulk carbohydrate fractions. Each sample was analyzed on a spectrophotometer at 485 nm and calibrated against a range of glucose concentrations.

The thickness of the biofilm was determined for days 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 of growth. A 5-ml syringe core was collected at these growth intervals, dipped in liquid nitrogen, and frozen over night at -20?C. A razor blade was used to split the frozen cores lengthwise, and the thickness of the biofilm was determined under a dissecting microscope. A sharp boundary between the golden-brown biofilm and the underlying white sediment was readily evident.

Erosion experiment-Erosion thresholds and rates were measured in a recirculating flume, 1.5 m long, 0.2 m wide, and 0.15 m high with a working section located 0.9 m down- stream of the inlet. A core sample was inserted into the working section of the flume from below and raised until the upper rim of the core barrel was flush with the flume floor. The flume was slowly filled with 89 liters of 2-,utm filtered seawater to give a water depth of 17 cm. The core contents were raised with a plunger until the sediment sur- face was flush with the barrel rim and the flume floor. A Sony Handycam 8-mm video camera was mounted above the sediment core to record bed erosion. One abiotic core was eroded on the first day of the experiment series. Two

This content downloaded from 188.72.127.119 on Fri, 13 Jun 2014 17:02:23 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 4: The Effect of Carbohydrate Production by the Diatom Nitzschia curvilineata on the Erodibility of Sediment

Biofilms and sediment stability 67

I I I I I I I I I 1 0 , 102 EXPONENTIAL STATIONARY PHASE

PHASE <*8-

E 100

0)E

CZ ~~~~~~~~~~~0 10-1 0) ::

0 -

101o~* chlorophyll 10-2 Q~ - / tv = carbohydrate CZ s t m = controlm o 0 - . . ';4 5 10-3

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Time (days)

Fig. 1. The mean growth curve and bulk carbohydrate profile of Nitzschia curvilineata incubated on replicate sediment cores. Er- ror bars = 1 standard deviation, n = 3. No growth was observed on the control core, which contained abiotic sediment.

diatom-sediment cores were chosen at random every few days and eroded in the recirculating flume.

A Dantec 55R46 stress sensor was then placed in the working area of the flume floor and calibrated to the rpm of the propeller motor. The calibration of a Dantec stress sensor involved regressing the sensor output to the rate of vertical pressure drop in water height within a ?/4-inch inner diameter pipe. Shear velocity values were converted from shear stress values, using the formula, T (N m-2) = p (kg m-3) X U.2 (m s-'), where p = 1,028 (kg m-3), the density of seawater.

Determination of erosion thresholds and erosion rates- The flow in the flume was increased at 500-rpm intervals of the propeller motor and every 10 min in a stepwise manner. Water samples were collected at time zero and every speed increment thereafter by siphoning 150 ml of flume seawater. The water samples were filtered with Whatman glass-fiber filters (GF/C) and analyzed for chlorophyll as above. Digi- tization of the exposed area of the underlying white diato- mite after the release of the golden-brown diatom mat ag- gregates was performed from frozen video frames using the software package OPTIMUS. U*cr.t was determined as the U. value at which the smallest visible area of underlying sedi- ment was exposed upon aggregate erosion. Duplicate cores were eroded and recorded on video with the exception of days 4, 6, and 9. The volume of sediment eroded was de- termined from the digitized exposed area and the measured depth of erosion. The erosion rates of the biofilm-sediment material was calculated as the differential volumes of the eroded material divided by the core barrel area and by the elapsed time.

Results

Growth observations of N. curvilineata-The mean growth curve of the replicate stock cultures of N. curvili-

I I I I I I I I I 100 -: - 10.0 EXPONENTIAL STATIONARY PHASE E PHASE

E1.00 -E

co

.0 E

co 0 / ' E 0

~ .0 2 4 1. 8 01V41 82

o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~c

0~~~~~~~~~~~~~1 c e 10 bo o

0

o 0.01 C Chlorophyll c- C carbohydrate

t p Mat thickness

I I I I I I I m~~~~c 0.1 0 2 4 6 8 1 0 12 14 16 18 20

Time (days)

Fig. 2. The mean growth curve, bulk carbohydrate profile, and mat thickness of Nitzschia curvilineata grown on replicate sediment cores. Error bars = i standard deviation, n = 3.

neata incubated on the sediment cores is shown in Fig. 1 (n = 3). The chlorophyll concentrations increased exponential- ly and reached a maximum on day 9 (exponential phase of growth). The chlorophyll concentrations did not increase for the remainder of the incubation period (stationary phase of growth). An increase in bulk carbohydrate concentration took place at the end of the exponential phase or the onset of stationary phase. Because the colloidal carbohydrate con- centrations fell below the detection limit of the spectropho- tometer, this variable was not used as a correlate of erosion thresholds or rates. Contamination of the cultures did not occur because,the chlorophyll concentrations of the control core containing O.45-b-tm filtered seawater did not increase during the 1 8-d experimental period.

Minute oxygen bubbles, produced through photosynthesis, eventually coalesced up to a size of approximately 1 mm. At first, the oxygen bubbles remained attached to the biofilm surface or trapped within the diatom mat. Fissures formed in the diatom mat when trapped oxygen bubbles gained suf- ficient buoyancy. These bubbles would occasionally break through the mat, giving it a "flaked" appearance. Several bubbles, floating on the water surface, were observed to have biofilm-sediment material attached to the bubble surfaces. The diatom mats resembled dense green-brown soft carpets by day 9 of growth. After day 12 of growth the color of the diatom mat changed from green-brown to a mottled white (diatomite) golden-brown as the sediment was incorporated into the biofilm. At this time the diatom mat became more translucent and shrank around the sediment, accentuating the flaked appearance of the mat. The diatom mat at this stage of growth appeared to be more "sticky" than at other stages of growth because any aggregates eroded as bedload would only travel a few centimeters before adhering quickly to the diatom mat. The diatom mat reached a maximum thickness of 2.5 mm on day 12 of the experimental period (Fig. 2).

This content downloaded from 188.72.127.119 on Fri, 13 Jun 2014 17:02:23 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 5: The Effect of Carbohydrate Production by the Diatom Nitzschia curvilineata on the Erodibility of Sediment

68 Sutherland et al.

9000 - DAY 4 1 1

6000 -Ucrit = 0.0255 m s-- 3000 - MEA 8693 mm j 6000 - DAY 6 llt- 4000 - U-crit = 0.0206 m s-1 2000 _ MEA = 6463 mm

2

6000 - DAY 9 4000 - U.crit =0.0234 m s-1 E 2I E 2000 - MEA 986 mm

CZ I~~~~~ I .--'~-

v 6000 - DAY 12

o2 4000 U-crit = 0.0255 m s-1 W 2000 - MEA = 327 mm

6000 - DAY 15 -

4000 - Ucrt = 0.0269 m s-1 2000 - MEA = 66 mm

6000 - DAY 18 4000 - No erosion to biofilm base

2000 -

O b 1 ~ ~~~ * 1. *

0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 U. (m s-1)

Fig. 3. The relationship between eroded area of the diatom mat and U. for successive stages of growth of Nitzschia curvilineata. Estimates of erosion thresholds (U*crt) and maximum eroded area (MEA) for the various stages of growth are presented. Erosion did not occur on day 18 of growth. Single cores were analyzed on days 4, 6, and 9, while duplicate cores were analyzed on days 12, 15, and 18. Error bars = 1 standard deviation.

Erosion thresholds-Figure 3 shows the relationship be- tween the eroded area of the diatom mat and shear velocity (U.). With the exception of day 4, an increase in U*cr.t was observed at the end of exponential phase and the duration of stationary phase. An increase in both UU,,,, and the sedi- ment bulk carbohydrate concentration between days 6 to 15 is evident (Figs. 1, 3). During the exponential phase of growth, the size of the aggregates eroded increased with in- creasing U*cr.t within each erosion trial. The erosion of small- er-sized aggregates (diameter 1-3 mm) during the exponen- tial phase was gradually replaced with the erosion of larger-sized aggregates (diameter 10-15 mm) during the sta- tionary phase. Fewer size categories of aggregates were eroded during the stationary phase and erosion of aggregates was limited to the larger size classes of aggregates toward the end of the stationary phase. The erosion threshold on the last day of the experiment was greater than the highest U. value generated by the flume and as a result is represented

EXPONENTIAL PHASE STATIONARY PHASE

r2 = 0.759 1.000

(I,

E E 0.100 _ CZ

0 '<n\ o 0.010 _ w

A 0.001 -

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 Chlorophyll (pg ml[')

EXPONENTIAL PHASE STATIONARY PHASE

r2= 0.958 1.000

E

0.100

0

? 0.010 w

B 0.001 l l l l

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Bulk carbohydrate (pg ml[1)

Fig. 4. The relationship between erosion rate and sediment chlorophyll (A) and bulk carbohydrate (B) content.

by a dashed line. The video recordings of the eroded cores containing less than 2 d of growth could not be digitized because the faint diatom mat (noneroded area) could not be discerned from the eroded area of the core; therefore, the results are limited to the period between day 4 and day 18 of diatom mat growth.

Erosion rates-A large decrease in the maximum eroded area of the diatom mat took place during the growth period (Fig. 3). Little variation occurred within the duplicate cores analyzed on days 12, 15, and 18 of growth. Note that the error bars (1 standard deviation) plotted for days 12, 15, and 18 are not detectable on the standardized y-axis scale, sug- gesting that the signal-to-noise ratio is relatively high. Neg- ative correlations existed between the erosion rate of the sediment-biofilm material and sediment chlorophyll concentration (r2 = 0.759, P = 0.024; Fig. 4A) and sediment bulk carbohydrate concentration (r2 = 0.958, P = 0.001; Fig. 4B). A strong correlation was found between erosion rate and the bulk carbohydrate-to-chlorophyll ratio (r2 = 0.996, P < 0.00 1; Fig. 5). Between days 4 and 15 of growth,

This content downloaded from 188.72.127.119 on Fri, 13 Jun 2014 17:02:23 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 6: The Effect of Carbohydrate Production by the Diatom Nitzschia curvilineata on the Erodibility of Sediment

Biofilms and sediment stability 69

1.000 r2 = 0.996

cm (i\

E 0.100

g E 0

n 0.010 0 w

0.001 I l l l 0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Bulk carbohydrate chlorophyll

Fig. 5. The relationship between erosion rate and the ratio of bulk carbohydrate to chlorophyll.

erosion rates varied by a factor of 75, while erosion thresh- olds varied by a factor of 1.3.

Discussion

Growth observations of N. curvilineata-The growth in size of the oxygen bubbles and the diatom growth, migra- tion, and carbohydrate production of N. curvilineata contrib- uted to the increasing thickness of the biofilm that reached a maximum of 2.5 mm at the onset of the stationary phase (Fig. 2). These processes would also contribute to changes in the microfabric of the developing biofilm. Oxygen bub- bles formed, coalesced, and reached a diameter of up to 1 mm. The coalesced oxygen bubbles gained buoyancy and finally broke through the biofilm, giving the torn biofilm a flaked or cracked appearance. Sundback (1994) suggested that flaking of a productive sediment layer was formed due to a combination of high photosynthetic activity and stagnant conditions. "Blister" or "bubble" mats containing oxygen bubbles trapped by a thin film of microalgal mucilage have been described by Jorgensen et al. (1983) and Yallop et al. (1994), respectively, and in situ flaking has been observed on cohesive mats by Jonsson et al. (1994). The entrapment of oxygen bubbles within the biofilm would alter the biofilm- sediment bulk density and provide lift forces, making the sediment more susceptible to erosion. Rising oxygen bubbles that carried small amounts of biofilm-sediment material with them, provided a form of resuspension to the overlying water column.

Carbohydrate production by N. curvilineata-Colloidal carbohydrate and bulk carbohydrate were the two carbohy- drate fractions considered in this study. Colloidal carbohy- drate is the supernatant fraction obtained during extraction and is referred to as the soluble, colloidal, labile, or liquid phase (Grant et al. 1986; Underwood and Paterson 1993;

Madsen et al. 1993; Underwood et al. 1995). Bulk carbo- hydrate is the sediment fraction and is referred to as the bulk, bound, capsular, or solid phase. These two general carbo- hydrate fractions are operational classifications that depend on aqueous extraction and centrifugation. Discrete fractions or physical states of EPS do not exist in nature (Decho 1994). Instead, a continuum exists of tertiary states ranging from highly condensed gels, loosely conformed slimes, to colloidal solutions. The slime form is thought to be produced for purposes of locomotion (Decho 1990). Capsular EPS may aid in the (1) adsorption of essential nutrients and trace metals; (2) protection against desiccation, grazing, and toxic metals; and (3) adhesion to substrate (Decho 1990).

Little is known about the ecological significance of the increased production of extracellular capsular carbohydrates for the enhancement of the growth and survival of the pro- ducing microbe. The production of capsular material appears to be a response to a shift in growth phase or the cessation of growth and not to the limitation of a single nutrient (Kroen and Rayburn 1984). Both nitrogen and phosphate limitation have been shown to increase carbohydrate pro- duction in microbes (Myklestad 1977; Kroen and Rayburn 1984; de Philippis et al. 1993; Obernosterer and Herndl 1995). An increase in bulk carbohydrate was observed at the end of the exponential phase or the onset of the stationary phase.

The majority of studies that investigate the physiological factors controlling extracellular carbohydrate production have been performed on planktonic diatoms (Allan et al. 1972; Myklestad and Haug 1972; Brockman et al. 1979; Myklestad 1974; Myklestad et al. 1989; Obernosterer and Herndl 1995). In pelagic forms, extracellular carbohydrate production increases during the stationary phase when nitro- gen or phosphate is limiting. During this stage of growth, extracellular carbohydrate production has been observed to be 1.25 times greater than the manufacture of intracellular carbohydrates (Myklestad 1974). The increased production of extracellular carbohydrate in the stationary phase also oc- curs in benthic diatoms. Amphora coffeaeformis and Navic- ula subinflata showed higher rates of carbohydrate produc- tion in the stationary phase (Bhosle et al. 1995), and the cells of Navicula pelliculosa showed an accumulation of capsular material during stationary phase (Lewin 1955). The increase in bulk carbohydrate in this study was probably due to the exhaustion of nutrients from the F/2 growth medium (Guillard 1972), leading one to think that the increase in bulk carbohydrate was due to the formation of capsular material.

It has been disputed whether the enhanced carbohydrate concentration observed in the stationary phase is due to ac- tive secretion or is an overflow reaction and, hence, an ac- cumulation of liberated storage products (Allan et al. 1972). It appears that the EPS are actively produced and transported in Golgi vesicles to secretion sites at the plasmalemma (Hoagland et al. 1993). The composition of extracellular polysaccharides has been observed to be different than that of the intracellular reserve (Allan et al. 1972; Myklestad et al. 1972) and more similar to that of the mucilaginous sheath surrounding the diatom (Allan et al. 1972).

This content downloaded from 188.72.127.119 on Fri, 13 Jun 2014 17:02:23 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 7: The Effect of Carbohydrate Production by the Diatom Nitzschia curvilineata on the Erodibility of Sediment

70 Sutherland et al.

Relationship between U*crt and sediment chlorophyll and carbohydrate content-A decrease in the erosion threshold measured on day 6 was followed by a steady increase in erosion thresholds for the remainder of the experiment (Fig. 3). The subsequent increase after day 6 may be attributed to the increase in bulk carbohydrates during this time (Fig. 1). Because the bulk carbohydrate concentration stabilized after day 12 of the experiment, a change in EPS composition may be responsible for the increase in U*crt after day 12. The composition of EPS is influenced by nutrient status and growth phase (Decho 1990). A change in monosaccharide composition, from C-5 sugars to C-6 sugars, was observed during growth of a culture of Navicula sp. (Stal et al. 1994). This change was related to an increase in hydrogen bridges and the potential for the formation of ion bridges with mul- tivalent cations. The difference in nutrient dynamics between a "pioneering" versus "established" microbial community (Villbrandt et al. 1990) and the associated change in EPS composition may influence the "stickiness" or intergrain binding capacity of the EPS matrix.

Relationship between erosion rate and sediment chloro- phyll and carbohydrate content-A strong correlation be- tween the bulk carbohydrate-to-chlorophyll ratio and erosion rate was evident (Fig. 5). The ratio of carbohydrate to chlo- rophyll may serve as an indicator of the physiological state of the diatoms, which may be used as a more reliable pre- dictive tool for quantifying biostabilization. Grant and Gust (1987) stressed that photopigments of biofilms are not re- sponsible for the actual binding of sediment but do serve as a quantitative index of an EPS-producing microbial biomass. Madsen et al. (1993) found that only the biovolume of motile diatoms harvested with the coverglass technique gave a sig- nificant correlation with erosion thresholds. They stressed that the relationship between chlorophyll concentration and carbohydrate concentration is not simple and that other fac- tors such as the ratios of motile versus nonmotile diatoms and the physiological status of the diatoms should be con- sidered. Knowledge of whether the biofilm is in a "pio- neering" or "established" state will provide information on the extent to which changes in the binding of sediment will take place.

It is interesting to note that the erosion of sediment during the stationary phase was tightly controlled by the erosion of the diatom mat, because the majority of sediment eroded during the stationary phase was sediment incorporated into the biofilm during development. The exposed underlying sediment remained under 102 mm2 or 1% of the total core surface area after day 12. The exposed sediment did not appear to erode, probably due to the fact that the area was too small to allow water to undercut the biofilm-sediment interface. Additionally, exposed sediment was 2.5 mm below the water-biofilm interface and may not have been subjected to fluid forces.

Erosion rates of chlorophyll-The erosion rate of a single biofilm component is a function of both the strength of the sediment and the concentration of that component in the sed- iment available for resuspension. For example, the increase in erosion rate of chlorophyll during the exponential phase

2.0 EXPONENTIAL STATIONARY PHASE A PHASE

0 1.5 0 __

( E 1.0 Cd u

.2 0.5 0

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (days)

6 - EXPONENTIAL STATIONARY PHASE B

CD ~~PHASE

may relct th5 iutnosices nsdmn hoo

cmJ

o E

cin

a)01

0-o

0- c

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Time (days)

Fig. 6. Erosion rates of chlorophyll calculated from suspended samples (A) and standardized to sediment chlorophyll (B) at suc- cessive stages of growth of Nitzschia curvilineata.

may reflect the simultaneous increase in sediment chloro- phyll concentration available for resuspension (Figs. 1, 6). An exponential decrease in the erosion rate of chlorophyll was observed once it was standardized to the concentration of chlorophyll in the sediment. The erosion rate of chloro- phyll normalized to the sediment chlorophyll concentration serves as a more reliable measurement of erodibility of the sediment (Fig. 6B).

Stabilization coefficient-Because a standard approach to the determination of erosion thresholds does not exist, it is difficult to put the results reported in this paper in context with those of other laboratory and field studies. Stability coefficients have been used to compare the effect of different diatoms (Holland et al. 1974) or different biofilm types of various investigations (Paterson 1994) on the erodibility of sediment. Paterson (1994) defined a stabilization coefficient as the percent ratio of a U*crit value of a biofilm to a U*crit value of an abiotic sediment (control). The minimum and maximum stabilization coefficients cover a much narrower

This content downloaded from 188.72.127.119 on Fri, 13 Jun 2014 17:02:23 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 8: The Effect of Carbohydrate Production by the Diatom Nitzschia curvilineata on the Erodibility of Sediment

Biofilms and sediment stability 71

range (123-258%) compared to those across various inves- tigations (25-770%) reported by Paterson (1994).

Conclusions-The diatom, N. curvilineata, influenced the erosion characteristics of the sediment by increasing erosion threshold and decreasing erosion rate. Variations in erosion rate during the diatom growth period were significantly greater than variations in erosion threshold. A strong cor- relation was observed between erosion rate and the bulk car- bohydrate-to-chlorophyll ratio . Sediment stability increased with successive stages of diatom growth, even though bub- bles, providing buoyant forces, formed and became trapped within the biofilm.

References

ALLAN, G. G., J. LEWIN, AND P. G. JOHNSON. 1972. Marine poly- mers. IV. Diatom polysaccharides. Bot. Mar. 15: 102-108.

BHOSLE, N. B., S. S. SAWANT, A. GARG, AND A. B. WAGH. 1995. Isolation and partial chemical analysis of exopolysaccharides from the marine fouling diatom, Navicula subinflata. Bot. Mar. 38: 103-110.

BROCKMAN, U. H., K. EBERLEIN, H. D. JUNGE, E. MAIER-REIMER, AND D. SIEBERS. 1979. The development of a natural plankton population in an outdoor tank with nutrient-poor seawater. LI. Changes in dissolved carbohydrates and amino acids. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1: 283-291.

CARLTON, R. G., AND R. G. WETZEL. 1988. Phosphorus flux from lade sediments: Effect of epipelic algal oxygen production. Limnol. Oceanogr. 33(4, part 1): 562-570.

DECHO, A. W. 1990. Microbial exopolymer secretions in ocean environments: Their role(s) in food webs and marine processes. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev. 28: 73-153.

. 1994. Molecular-scale events influencing the macroscale of cohesiveness of exopolymers, p. 135-148. In W. E. Krum- bein, D. M. Paterson, and L. J. Stal [eds.], Biostabilization of sediments. Verlag, Oldenburg.

, AND G. R. LOPEZ. 1993. Exopolymer microenvironments of microbial flora: Multiple and interactive effects on trophic relationships. Limnol. Oceanogr. 38: 1633-1645.

, AND D. J. W. MORIARTY. 1990. Bacterial exopolymer uti- lization by a harpacticoid copepod: A methodology and results. Limnol. Oceanogr. 35: 1039-1049.

DE PHILIPPIS, R., M. C. MARGHERI, E. PELOSI, AND S. VENTURA. 1993. Exopolysaccharide production by a unicellular cyano- bacterium isolated from a hypersaline habitat. J. Appl. Phycol. 5: 387-394.

DOWD, M. 1991. On the prediction of bivalve growth in an aqua- culture site. MSc. thesis. Dalhousie Univ. 133 p.

DUBOIS, M., K. A. GILLES, J. K. HAMILTON, P. S. REBERS, AND F. SMITH. 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 28: 350-356.

EDGAR, L. A., AND J. D. PICKETT-HEAPS. 1984. Diatom locomo- tion, p. 47-88. In F E. Round and D. J. Chapman [eds.], Prog- ress in phycological research, v. 3. Biopress.

FLOTHMANN, S., AND I. WERNER. 1992. Experimental eutrophica- tion on an intertidal sandflat: Effects on microphytobenthos, meio- and macrofauna, p. 93-100. In G. Colombo, I. Ferrari, V. U. Ceccherelli, and R. Ross [eds.], Marine eutrophication and population dynamics. Open and Olsen.

GRANT, J., AND G. GUST. 1987. Prediction of coastal sediment stability from photopigment content of mats of purple sulphur bacteria. Nature 330: 244-246.

, U. V. BATHMANN, AND E. L. MILLS. 1986. The interaction

between benthic diatom films and sediment transport. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci. 23: 225-238.

GUILLARD, R. R. L. 1972. Culture of marine phytoplankton for feeding marine invertebrates, p. 29-60. In W. L. Smith, and M. H. Chanley [eds.], Conference on culture of marine inver- tebrate animals. Plenum.

HOAGLAND, K. D., J. R. RoSOWSKI, M. R. GRETZ, AND S. C. ROE- MER. 1993. Diatom extracellular polymeric substances, func- tion, fine structure, chemistry, and physiology. J. Phycol. 29: 537-566.

HOLLAND, A. F., R. G. ZINGMARK, AND J. M. DEAN. 1974. Quan- titative evidence concerning the stabilization of sediments by marine benthic diatoms. Mar. Biol. 27: 191-196.

JONSSON, B., K. SUNDBACK, AND C. NILSSON. 1994. An upright life-form of an epipelic motile diatom: On the behaviour of Gyrosigma balticum. Eur. J. Phycol. 29: 11-15.

JORGENSEN, B. B. 1994. Diffusion processes and boundary layers in microbial mats, p. 243-254. In L. J. Stal and P. Caumette [eds.], Microbial mats-structure, development, and environ- mental significance. NATO ASI Ser. G35.

, N. P REVSBECH, AND Y. COHEN. 1983. Photosynthesis and structure of benthic microbial mats: Microelectrode and SEM studies of four cyanobacterial communities. Limnol. Oceanogr. 28: 1075-1093.

KROEN, W. K., AND W. R. RAYBURN. 1984. Influence of growth status and nutrients on extracellular polysaccharide synthesis by the soil alga Chlamydomonas mexicana (Chlorophyceae). J. Phycol. 20: 253-257.

LEWIN, J. C. 1955. The capsule of the diatom, Navicula pelliculosa. J. Gen. Microbiol. 13: 162-169.

Lui, D., P T S. WONG, AND B. J. DUTKA. 1973. Determination of carbohydrates in lake sediment by a modified phenol-sulfuric acid method. Water Res. 7: 741-746.

MADSEN, K. N., P NILSSON, AND K. SUNDBACK. 1993. The influ- ence of benthic microalgae on the stability of a subtidal sedi- ment. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 170: 159-177.

MYKLESTAD, S. 1974. Production of carbohydrates by marine planktonic diatoms. II. Comparison of nine different species in culture. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 15: 261-274.

. 1977. Production of carbohydrates by marine planktonic diatoms. II Influence of the N: P ratio in the growth medium on the assimilation ratio, growth rate, and production of cel- lular and extracellular carbohydrates by Chaetoceros affinis var. Willei (Gran) Hustedt and Skeletonema costatum (Grev.) Cleve. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 29: 161-179.

, AND A. HAUG. 1972. Production of carbohydrates by the marine diatom Chaetoceros affinis var. Willei (Gran) Hustedt. I. Effect of the concentration of nutrients in the culture medi- um. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 9: 137-144.

9 , AND B. LARSON. 1972. Production of carbohy- drates by the marine diatoms Chaetoceros affinis var. Willei (Gran) Hustedt. II. Preliminary investigation of the extracel- lular polysaccharide. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 9: 137-144.

0 O. HoLM-HANSEN, K. M. VARUM, AND B. E. VOLCANI. 1989. Rate of release of extracellular amino acids and carbo- hydrates from the marine diatom Chaetoceros affinis. J. Plank. Res. 11(4): 763-773.

OBERNOSTERER, I., AND G. J. HERNDL. 1995. Phytoplankton extra- cellular release and bacterial growth dependence on the inor- ganic N: P ratio. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 116: 247-257.

PARSONS, T. R., Y I. MAITA, AND C. M. LALLI. 1984. A manual of chemical and biological methods for seawater analysis. Per- gamon.

PATERSON, D. M. 1986. The migratory behaviour of diatom assem- blages in a laboratory tidal micro-ecosystem examined by low-

This content downloaded from 188.72.127.119 on Fri, 13 Jun 2014 17:02:23 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 9: The Effect of Carbohydrate Production by the Diatom Nitzschia curvilineata on the Erodibility of Sediment

72 Sutherland et al.

temperature scanning electron microscopy. Diatom Res. 1: 227-239.

. 1988. The influence of epipelic diatoms on the erodibility of an artificial sediment, p. 345-355. In H. Simola [ed.], Pro- ceedings of the 10th Diatom Symposium on Living and Fossil Diatoms. Joensuu, Koenigstein.

. 1994. Microbiological mediation of sediment structure and behaviour, p. 97-109. In L. J. Stal, and P. Caumette [eds.], Microbial mats. NATO ASI Ser. G35.

REVSBECH, N. P, B. B. JORGENSEN, AND T. H. BLACKBURN. 1983. Microelectrode studies of the photosynthesis and 2, H2S, and pH profiles of a microbial mat. Limnol. Oceanogr. 28: 1062- 1074.

STAL, L. J., M. VILLBRANDT, AND B. DE WINDER. 1994. Ecophys- iology. EPS in benthic phototrophic microorganisms, p. 377- 399. In W. E. Krumbien, D. M. Paterson, and L. J. Stal, [eds.], Biostabilization of sediments. Verlag, Oldenburg.

SUNDBACK, K. 1994. The response of shallow-water sediment com- munities to environmental changes, p. 17-40. In W. E. Krum- bien, D. M. Paterson, and L. J. Stal [eds.], Biostabilization of sediments. Verlag, Oldenburg.

, AND W. GRANELI. 1988. Influence of microphytobenthos on the nutrient flux between sediment and water: A laboratory study. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 43: 63-69.

, AND B. JONSSON. 1988. Microphytobenthic productivity and biomass in sublittoral sediments of a stratified bay, SE Kattegatt. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 122: 63-81.

UNDERWOOD, G. J. C., AND D. M. PATERSON. 1993. Seasonal changes in diatom biomass, sediment stability and biogenic stabilization in the Sevem Estuary. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 73: 871-887.

, D. M. PATERSON, AND R. J. PARKES. 1995. The measure- ment of microbial carbohydrate exopolymers from intertidal sediments. Limnol. Oceanogr. 40: 1243-1253.

VILLBRANDT, M., L. J. STAL, AND W. E. KRUMBEIN. 1990. Inter- actions between nitrogen fixation and oxygenic photosynthesis in a marine microbial mat. FEMS Microb. Ecol. 74: 59-72.

WESTALL, F, AND Y. RINCE. 1994. Biofilms, microbial mats and microbe-particle interactions: Electron microscope observa- tions from diatomaceous sediments. Sedimentology 41: 147- 162.

WILTSHIRE, K. H. 1992. The influence of microphytobenthos on oxygen and nutrient fluxes between eulittoral sediments and associated water phases in the Elbe Estuary, p. 63-70. In G. Colombo, I. Ferrari, V. U. Ceccherelli, and R. Ross [eds.], Ma- rine eutrophication and population dynamics. Olsen and Open.

YALLOP, M. L., B. DE WINDER, D. M. PATERSON, AND L. J. STAL. 1994. Comparative structure, primary production and biogenic stabilization of cohesive and non-cohesive marine sediments inhabited by microphytobenthos. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci. 39: 565-582.

Received: 8 November 1996 Accepted: 20 May 1997

This content downloaded from 188.72.127.119 on Fri, 13 Jun 2014 17:02:23 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions