6

Click here to load reader

The Effect of Emergency 1 Department Crowding on Patient Outcomes … · The Effect of Emergency Department Crowding on Patient Outcomes Filippatos George1 and Karasi Evridiki2 1

  • Upload
    lehanh

  • View
    212

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Effect of Emergency 1 Department Crowding on Patient Outcomes … · The Effect of Emergency Department Crowding on Patient Outcomes Filippatos George1 and Karasi Evridiki2 1

iMedPub Journalshttp://journals.imedpub.com

Health Science Journal ISSN 1791-809X

2015Vol. 9 No. 1:6

1© Copyright iMedPub | This article is available in: www.hsj.gr/archive

The Effect of Emergency Department Crowding on Patient

Outcomes

Filippatos George1 and Karasi Evridiki2

1 General Hospital of Elefsina “Thriassio”, Greece

2 SW,Non-GovernmentOrganization“Klimaka”, Greece

Correspondence: Filippatos George

[email protected]

Str Karaiskaki 28, N.Penteli, Athens, Greece, P.C.: 15236

Tel: +306977783941

AbstractBackground: Anextremeexcessofpatientsexceedingthecapacityofemergencydepartments (EDs) to provide care is an emerging threat to patient safety andhealthsystemsworldwide.

Aim: The purpose of this literature review was to investigate the effects ofemergencydepartmentcrowdingonpatientsoutcome.

Method and Material: A comprehensive search of the medical literature inPubmed/MEDLINE databasewas performed to identify all original articles thatwerepublishedoravailableon-linebetweenJanuary1,2003,toJanuary1,2013,and related to the concepts of ‘‘emergency department’’ and ‘‘crowding’’ or‘’overcrowding’’.

Results: Of the 1327 studies that were initially retrieved, 484 were excludedbecausetheyhadnorelevancetothetopicand843aftercheckingforeligibilitycriteria.Fromremaining61articles,atotalof35studieswerefinally includedinthereview.Thethreemaincategoriesthatwereconstructedbasedonthestudies,weredelaysintreatmentinterventions,increasedmedicalerrorsoradverseeventsandincreasedmortality.

Conclusions: ThebodyofliteratureinaggregatestronglysuggeststhatEDcrowdingisassociatedwithpotentialofpoorerperformanceandadverseclinicaloutcomes,including mortality. Further research is needed to fully understand the precisemechanism throughwhich crowding adversely affect patient care. PoliciesmustalsobetargetedtoadaptofemergencycaresysteminthefluctuationofinputsforbettercarethattranslatesintobetteroutcomesforpatientsvisitingEDs..

Keywords: Emergencydepartmentcrowding;Patientsafety

IntroductionEmergency department (ED) crowding has been described asthemostseriousproblemthatendangerthereliabilityofhealthcaresystemworldwide[1].TheAmericanCollegeofEmergencyPhysiciansdefinescrowdingasasituationinwhichtheidentifiedneed for emergency services exceeds available resourcesfor patient care in the emergency department, hospital, orboth [2]. The conceptual model partitions ED crowding into 3interdependentcomponents:input,throughput,andoutput[3].

ThecommonlystudiedcauseofcrowdingisdemandforEDcare.Between1997and2007theincreaseintotalannualEDvisitsinUSAwas almost double [4] and between 2001-2008 was 60%

faster than would be expected from population growth [5]. Alarge proportion of all ED visitswere for nonurgent conditionsthat estimated at 37% (range 8%-62%) [6] and from frequentuserswhocomprised4.5%to8%ofallEDpatientsbutaccountedfor21%to28%ofallvisits[7].

Onemainfactorthatmaycausecrowdingisinadequatestaffing.HalfofEDsexceedrecommendedpatienttonurseratioof4:1forroutineEDbeds[8]and68%apatienttonurseratioof1:1forcriticalcarebeds[9].Themeannurse:patientratiosatmorningshiftwere1:15,atafternoonshift1:7andatnight1:4[10].

Hospital bed shortages have been studied as factors thatpotentially affect crowding. Emergency rooms and trauma

Page 2: The Effect of Emergency 1 Department Crowding on Patient Outcomes … · The Effect of Emergency Department Crowding on Patient Outcomes Filippatos George1 and Karasi Evridiki2 1

2 This article is available in: www.hsj.gr/archive

ARCHIVOS DE MEDICINAISSN 1698-9465

2015Vol. 9 No. 1:6

Health Science Journal ISSN 1791-809X

centersinU.S.Adeclinedby3%fromperiod2003-2007[11].Non-availability of ED beds because they are occupied by admittedpatients waiting for transfer from the ED to inpatient unitsrestricttheEDscapacitytoacceptnewarrivalsandconsumeEDsresources[12-14].Arecentstudyconcludedthat,ifcurrentbedusetrendspersistandasthenumbersoffrailolderpatientsriseexponentially,a62%increaseinhospitalbedswillberequiredtomeetexpecteddemandby2050,atacostalmostequal to theentirecurrentAustralianhealthcarebudget[15].

EDcrowdinghasresulted inpoorperformanceonwaitingtimeand length of stay (LOS). In US hospitals the odds of beingexaminedbyaphysicianwithinthetimerecommendedattriagedeclinedby30%from1997to2006[16],waitingtimeincreasedfrom46.5minutesto58.1minutesfromperiodbetween2003-2009[17]andEDLOSincreasedfrom132minutesin2001to154minutesin2005[18].TherewasalargerincreaseamongcriticallyillpatientsforwhomEDLOSincreasedfrom185minutesin2001to254minutesin2005[18].Inotherstudyfoundthatanincreasefrom the 20th to the 80th percentile in ED arrivals resulted inincreasesof42minutes inwaitingtimeand49minutes inLOS[19].

Theobviousoperationalandlogisticproblemscreatedbycrowdinghaveavarietyofundesirableconsequencesonpatients,staffandhospitals[20,21].Thesixdimensionsofqualityincludingsafety,effectiveness, patient-centeredness, efficiency, timeliness, andequitythathasbeendescribedbyTheInstituteofMedicine,mayallbecompromisedwhenpatientsexperiencelongwaitingtimeto seeaphysicianor leavingwithoutbeingexamined,patientsremainsintheEDaftertheyhavebeenadmittedtothehospital,buthavenotbeentransferredtoaninpatientunit,orambulancesaredivertedawayfromthehospitalclosesttothepatient[22].

Therefore, the objective of this review was to describe thescientificliteraturethatinvestigatestheeffectofEDcrowdingonpatientsoutcomes.

Method A comprehensive search of themedical literature in Pubmed/MEDLINE database was performed to identify all scientificarticles thatwerepublishedorwereavailableon-linebetweenJanuary1,2003,toJanuary1,2013,andrelatedtotheconceptsof‘‘emergencydepartment’’and‘‘crowding’’or‘’overcrowding’’.

The inclusive selection criteria were as follows: To be originalarticle,tousecrowdingmeasures,toprovideoddsratio(OR),riskratio(RR)orhazardratio(HR)estimateswithconfidenceintervalsandtobepublishedinEnglish.Weexcludedcommentariesandletters to the editor, original article for causes, solution andmeasures of emergency department crowding and adverseeffectsonpediatricpatients.

Tworeviewers independentlyevaluatedthetitlesandabstractsfor relevance to the topic and subsequently obtained full-textversions of all potentially relevant papers, which were thenfurtherdiscussedamongauthorsforfinalinclusion.

ResultsThe initial search yielded a total of 1327 citations, 484 wereexcludedaftertitle/abstractreviewand782didnotfulfillinclusioncriteria (94% inter-reviewer agreement). After retrieving the

full-textoftheremaining61articles,another26articles,whichfocus on waiting time, delays for diagnostic test and patientsperceptions,relatedtoEDcrowding,wereexcludedfromreview.Finally, only 35papersmeasured theeffectof ED crowdingonpatient outcomes and grouped in three categories: increaseddelaysintreatment,increasemedicalerrorsandadverseeventsand increasedmortality.Aflowchartof studies included in thisreviewispresentedinFigure1.

Delay in treatment interventions Seventeenstudies[23-39]examinedtherelationshipbetweenEDcrowdinganddelay in treatment. Regardingpainmanagement,Hwnagetal.,foundthatduringperiodsofgreaterpatientvolume,hip fracture patients had less documentation of pain on firstassessmentand longertimes topainassessment [23].Patientsexaminedduringperiodsofhighpatientconcentration,tookupto55minuteslongertohavedocumentedpainassessmentwithoutdifferencesinlikelihoodofpainassessment[24].AdministrationofanalgesiaduringhighlevelsofEDcrowdingmeasureswaslesslikelytopatientswithseverepain[25]andotherpainfulcondition[24]whilewasnotstatisticallysignificantinpatientwithback[26]orabdominal[27]painandhipfracture[23].Amongthosewhoreceivedtreatment,EDcrowdingmeasureswereassociatedwithahigherlikelihoodofdelayinbothtimefromtriagetoanalgesiaandtime from roomplacement to analgesia [25,26]. Likely, norelationbetweenworkloadandtimetoanalgesiawasobservedin patientswith fractured neck of femur orwrist and renal orbilliarycolic[28].

Regarding time to antibiotic administration for patients withpneumonia,fivestudiesassociatedincreasedlevelofEDcrowdingwith a decrease in the proportion of community-acquiredpneumonia(CAP)patientsreceivingantibioticswithinfourhours[29-33]. Thetime fromarrival toordera chest radiographwasprolonged by 14.3 minutes and from ordering of antibiotic toadministrationby9.3minutesforevery10additionalEDpatients[30].Theeffectofadditionalpatientsappears tooccurevenatvolumesbelowthemaximumbedcapacity[29].

Overcrowdingwasalsoassociatedwithincreaseddoor-to-balloonanddoor-to-needletimesforthe treatment of acute ST-ElevationMyocardialInfarction(STEMI)[34,35].Incontrast,timetoachieveemergencypercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforacuteSTEMIdid not correlate positivelywith crowding asmeasured by theoccupancyrate[36]andEDlengthofstayorleftwithoutbeingexamined[33].

Time to acute stroke care however, remained the same inthrombolysiseligiblepatientsregardlessofthecrowdingfactor,but not in patients outside of the intravenous thrombolysiswindow, who experienced delays in a CT-scan order andcompletionathigherlevelsofEDcrowding[37].

EDcrowdingasmeasuredbythenumberofpatientsvisits,wasassociated with delays in resuscitation efforts and mortalityduring ED stay. Patients who attended at day with daily visitequaltoorgreaterthan93(dailyEDpatientconcentrationrange57-140) had two-fold increased odds of experiencing delayedresuscitation effort and four-fold increased odds of in-hospitalmortalitycomparedwiththepatientswhoattendedatdaywithdailyvisitlessthan93[38].

Medication treatment time in patientswith acute asthmawas

Page 3: The Effect of Emergency 1 Department Crowding on Patient Outcomes … · The Effect of Emergency Department Crowding on Patient Outcomes Filippatos George1 and Karasi Evridiki2 1

3© Under License of Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

ARCHIVOS DE MEDICINAISSN 1698-9465

2015Vol. 9 No. 1:6

Health Science Journal ISSN 1791-809X

associatedwithhighestpercentilesofEDoccupancy.Timetoanebulizer order was 6 minutes longer (95% CI=1-13 minutes),andtimetoasteroidorderwas16minuteslonger(95%CI=0-38minutes)duringcrowdedperiods[39].

Increased medical errors and adverse eventsSixstudies[40-45]assessedtheeffectthatEDcrowdinghadonmedicalerrorsandadverseevents. EDovercrowdingisassociatedwith an increased frequencyofmedicationerrorsmeasured inrealtimebythemodifiedEDWINscore [40]orboardingstatus[41]. Errors included giving medications at incorrect doses,frequencies, durations, or routes and giving contraindicatedmedications [40]. Patients whose average crowding exposurewas in the highest quartile had two-fold increased odds ofexperiencing apreventableadverseeventcomparedtopatientswhose average crowding exposure was in the lowest quartile[42].ForeveryhourspentintheED,theoddsofexperiencinganadverseeventin-hospitalincreasedby3%[43].

Amongpatientswithacutecoronarysyndrome,severalcrowdingmeasures showed three to five times higher rates of adverseoutcomesascardiacarrest,congestiveheartfailure,ventriculartachycardia or fibrillation, supraventricular dysrhythmias,symptomaticbradycardia,hypotensionordeathduringthehighestlevelsofcrowding[44].Highhospitaloccupancywasassociatedwith increased incidence of serious complications defined asshock,needforintubationanddeathwithin24hoursforpatientsadmitted, but still treated in the emergency department and

managed by emergency department providers. The incidenceforseriouscomplicationswas13.62per1000patientdayswhenhospital occupancywas ≤90%, and it increased significantly to17.10and22.52per1000patientdaysforoccupancyat90%-95%and≥95%,respectively[45].

Increased mortality Twelve articles [46-57] specifically examined the associationbetween ED crowding andmortality. Occupancywas linked toincreasedoddsofdeathsat10daysforpatientswhopresentedto one Australian hospital (OR=1.34, 95% CI=1.04–1.72) [46]Usingthesamecrowdingmeasure,patientswithCAPhad9-foldincreased odds of 28-day mortality [47] Hospital occupancy≥100% in combinationwith access block ≥20% occupancywasassociatedwithanincreased2,7and30-daymortality(HR=1.3,95% CI=1.1–1.6, 1.3, 95% CI=1.2–1.5 and 1.2, 95% CI=1.1–1.3respectively)[48].

Mortalityincreasedwithincreasingboardingtime,from2.5%inpatientsboardedlessthan2hours,to4.5%inpatientsboarding12hoursormore(p<0.001)[49].Thein-hospitalmortalitywas17.4%forcriticallyillemergencydepartmentpatientswitha>6-hrdelayinintensivecareunittransfer,versus12,9%forcriticallyill patients who were transferred to intensive care unit in <6-hr (p<.001) [50]. The risk of death amonghigh and low acuitypatientswas1.79and1.71respectivelyformeanlengthofstayof≥6hourscomparedwith<1hour[51].ProlongedEDboardingstaythatexceeded8hourswasassociatedwithincreasedmortalityin

FlowdiagramofarticlesselectionFigure 1

Page 4: The Effect of Emergency 1 Department Crowding on Patient Outcomes … · The Effect of Emergency Department Crowding on Patient Outcomes Filippatos George1 and Karasi Evridiki2 1

4 This article is available in: www.hsj.gr/archive

ARCHIVOS DE MEDICINAISSN 1698-9465

2015Vol. 9 No. 1:6

Health Science Journal ISSN 1791-809X

patientswithnecrotizingfasciitis[52].ThelongEDstaywasnotassociatedwithmortality in patientswith non–STEMI butwasassociatedwithincreasedrateofrecurrentin-hospitalMI[53].

ED crowding, as measured by ambulance diversion at 187 hospitals, was associated with increased inpatient death rateoccurring in thefirst 3days (OR=1.05,95%CI=1.02–1.08) [54].AmongpatientsthatwereadmittedforAMIandexposedto12ormorehoursofambulancediversion,the 30-day,90-day,9-month,and 1-year mortality was increased [55]. The mortality foradmittedtraumapatientsonsignificantdiversiondays,definedasdaywhenhospitalswereondiversionformorethan8hours,wasslightlyhigherthanamongthoseadmittedondaywhenhospitalswereondiversionforfewerthan8hours(3.9%vs.3.3%),butwasstatisticallysignificantat the0.1 level (25%vs14%)amongthemostseverely illpatients[56]. Incontrast,ambulancediversioncontributedto28%reductioninpatientmortalityatanAustralianED[57].

Discussion EDcrowdingisassociatedwithdelaysintreatmentforemergencyconditions, thereby increasing the risk of poorer outcomes.Increased crowding levels, according to this review, wereassociatedwith thepotential of poorerperformance regardingpain management standards, such as timely and appropriateassessmentoranalgesiaonwhichhospitalsare judged[23-27].Delaysornottreatmentofacutepainhasconsequencesbeyondtheimmediateperceptionofsufferingandcannegativelyimpactpatients’well-beingonmultiplelevels[58].

Emergency departments in crowding conditionswere not ableto meet The Joint Commission and the Centers for MedicareandMedicaidServices(CMS)performancemeasurestargetsforpatientswith CAP, that are used as an indicator of the qualityof care, with a 4- hour benchmark [29-33]. Although currentguidelines for treating CAP do not recommend administeringantibiotics within a certain time limit, [59] early time to firstantibiotic dose should be considered as an important markerofoptimalpatientcareinpatientswithCAPratherthanafactorpredictingtheoutcome[60,61].Althougharticlesattemptedtorelatedegradationsinperformancetocrowdedconditions,theirevidence suggests thatperformancebegins todeteriorate longbeforeconditionsintheEDbegintobeidentifiedascrowded[29].

The impactofEDcrowdingontime-sensitiveprocessesofcaresuchasreperfusiontherapyiscontroversial.ThefindingthatEDcrowding,asmeasuredaccordingtoEDWINscore,associatedwith increasedtimetoballooninflationduringPCIforthetreatmentofacuteSTEMI[35]doesnotconfirmbythemuchmorerobust,prospectivedatafromthesameEDinastudydesignedtofollowup that study’s findings [36]. ED crowding was not associatedwith care delays in thrombolysis-eligible patients with stroke[37]butforpatientswithsuspectedacutemyocardialinfarction[34]. The established policies that high prioritize diagnosticand treatment algorithm critically ill patients stroke and acutemyocardialinfarctionmaynotbeaffectedbycompetingresourcedemand[36].

ED crowding exacerbates the rate of medical errors adverseaffectedqualityof care [40-42].Althoughamedicalerrordoesnotnecessarilyimplytheoccurrenceofamedicalharm,patientsexposedatriskofmedicalerrorspotentiallyincreasedtheirrisk

ofadverseevents.Criticallyillpatientsexposedtocrowdingarehighlylikelytobeattributabletoadverseeventscausedbymedicalerrors[44].Theincreasedlikelihoodofseriousadverseeventsisaplausiblemediatoroftherelationshipbetweencrowdingandincreasedlifethreateningcomplications[45].

Adverse events of emergency department crowding have alsobeen linked to fatalities asmeasured by eventualmortality onunselectedadmissionsorspecificpatientsubgroups.Thepossiblerelationshipbetweencrowdingandmortalityacrossstudiesarenotdirectly comparablebecauseofdifferences inED crowdingmeasure,studypopulations,andcase-mixadjustment. Although thesizeof theeffectwasnotconsistentacross themajorityofstudies, considering the adjusted ratio risks that ranging from1.05tomorethan3, thedirectionof theeffectwas [46-52,54-56].Only two studies [53,57]didnotfindassociationbetweenmortality and crowding as measured by ambulance diversionatoneEDinthefirststudy,butwithoutassessmentofpatientsmortalitywhowasdivertedtootherhospital[57]. Inthesecondstudy,EDLOSwereassociatedwithdecreaseduseofguideline-recommendedtherapiesandahigherriskofadverseeventsforpatientswithnon-STEMI[53]. EDcrowdingwasassociatedwithhigher mortalityratebothduringEDstayandupto30daysafteradmission,regardlessofseverityonpresentation.Theincreasedrisk of death for low acuity patients suggests, that processesmightbemorelikelytobreakdownifpatientsarethoughttobelowrisk[51].

This review is consistent with 4 previous reviews [20-22,62]looking at the effects of emergency department crowdingon patients outcomes. Delays in providing needed care andincreasedrisksofmortalityareidentifiedinallarticlesbyaddingdecreased satisfaction [21] and higher probability of leavingtheEDagainstmedicaladviceorwithoutbeingexamined [22].Another article focuses on adversemoral consequences of EDcrowding,ascompromisedprivacyandconfidentiality,impairedcommunication,anddiminishedaccesstocare[62].

The results of the current review should be interpreted in thecontext of some limitations. First, our research is limited onlytothePubmeddatabaseandwemayhavemissedsomestudiespublishedinothersdatabases.Second,theretrospectivedesignof the included studies based on existing patient registers ordatabasescannotexcludethepossibilityofconfoundingthatmayhaveaffectedtheseresults.Accuracyandvariabilityinthequalityofdocumentationamongdifferenthealthcarepersonnelitwasnotfeasibletoensurewithretrospectiveauditofdatabases.Thefindings show considerable variability in crowding measures,timeintervals,patientpopulationsandhospitalstatus,resultingtoinabilitytogeneralize.Finally,nostudydeterminedtheexactmechanism responsible for the association between crowdingandadverseevents,althoughsomeinferencescanbemade.

ConclusionThe body of literature in aggregate strongly suggests that EDcrowding is associated with poorer performance and adverseclinicaloutcomes,includingmortality.Furtherresearchisneededto fully understand the precise mechanism through whichcrowding adversely affect patient care. Policies must also betargeted to adapt of emergency care system in thefluctuationofinputsforbettercarethattranslatesintobetteroutcomesforpatientsvisitingEDs.

Page 5: The Effect of Emergency 1 Department Crowding on Patient Outcomes … · The Effect of Emergency Department Crowding on Patient Outcomes Filippatos George1 and Karasi Evridiki2 1

5© Under License of Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

ARCHIVOS DE MEDICINAISSN 1698-9465

2015Vol. 9 No. 1:6

Health Science Journal ISSN 1791-809X

References1 Pines JM, Hilton JA, Weber EJ, Alkemade AJ, Al Shabanah H, et

al. (2011) International perspectives on emergency departmentcrowding.AcadEmergMed18:1358-1370.

2 American College of Emergency Physicians (2006) Crowding. AnnEmergMed47:585.

3 AsplinBR,MagidDJ,RhodesKV,SolbergLI,LurieN,etal.(2003)Aconceptualmodelofemergencydepartmentcrowding.AnnEmergMed42:173-180.

4 TangN, Stein J,HsiaRY,Maselli JH,GonzalesR (2010) Trendsandcharacteristics of US emergency department visits, 1997-2007.JAMA304:664-670.

5 Pitts SR, Pines JM, HandriganMT, Kellermann AL (2012) Nationaltrends in emergency department occupancy, 2001 to 2008: effectof inpatient admissions versus emergency department practiceintensity.AnnEmergMed60:679-686.

6 Uscher-PinesL,Pines J,KellermannA,GillenE,MehrotraA (2013)Emergencydepartmentvisits fornonurgent conditions: systematicliteraturereview.AmJManagCare19:47-59.

7 LaCalleE,RabinE(2010)Frequentusersofemergencydepartments:themyths, thedata, and thepolicy implications.Ann EmergMed56:42-48.

8 Schneider SM, Gallery ME, Schafermeyer R, Zwemer FL (2003)Emergencydepartmentcrowding:apointintime.AnnEmergMed42:167-172.

9 Rose L, Ramagnano S (2013) Emergency nurse responsibilities formechanicalventilation:anationalsurvey.JEmergNurs39:226-232.

10 LynehamJ,CloughessyL,MartinV (2008)Workloads inAustralianemergencydepartmentsadescriptivestudy.IntEmergNurs16:200-206.

11 HarrisonJP,FergusonED(2011)ThecrisisinUnitedStateshospitalemergencyservices.IntJHealthCareQualAssur24:471-483.

12 CookeMW,WilsonS,HalsallJ,RoalfeA(2004)TotaltimeinEnglishaccidentandemergencydepartments isrelatedtobedoccupancy.EmergMedJ21:575-576.

13 White BA, Biddinger PD, Chang Y, Grabowski B, Carignan S, et al.(2013)Boardinginpatientsintheemergencydepartmentincreasesdischargedpatientlengthofstay.JEmergMed44:230-235.

14 CrillyJ,KeijzersG,KrahnD,SteeleM,GreenD,etal.(2011)Theimpactofatemporarymedicalwardclosureonemergencydepartmentandhospitalservicedeliveryoutcomes.QualManagHealthCare20:322-333.

15 Scott IA (2010)Publichospitalbedcrisis: too fewor toomisused?AustHealthRev34:317-324.

16 Horwitz LI, Bradley EH (2009) Percentage of US emergencydepartment patients seen within the recommended triage time:1997to2006.ArchInternMed169:1857-1865.

17 HingE,BhuiyaF(2012)Waittimefortreatmentinhospitalemergencydepartments:2009.NCHSDataBrief:1-8.

18 HerringA,WilperA,HimmelsteinDU,WoolhandlerS,Espinola JA,et al. (2009) Increasing length of stay among adult visits to U.S.Emergencydepartments,2001-2005.AcadEmergMed16:609-616.

19 AsaroPV,LewisLM,BoxermanSB (2007)The impactof inputandoutputfactorsonemergencydepartmentthroughput.AcadEmerg

Med14:235-242.

20 Hoot NR, Aronsky D (2008) Systematic review of emergencydepartment crowding: causes, effects, and solutions. Ann EmergMed52:126-136.

21 Johnson KD, Winkelman C (2011) The effect of emergencydepartmentcrowdingonpatientoutcomes:aliteraturereview.AdvEmergNursJ33:39-54.

22 BernsteinSL,AronskyD,DusejaR,EpsteinS,HandelD,etal.(2009)SocietyforAcademicEmergencyMedicine,EmergencyDepartmentCrowdingTaskForce.Theeffectofemergencydepartmentcrowdingonclinicallyorientedoutcomes.AcadEmergMed16:1-10.

23 HwangU,RichardsonLD,SonuyiTO,MorrisonRS(2006)Theeffectofemergencydepartmentcrowdingonthemanagementofpaininolderadultswithhipfracture.JAmGeriatrSoc54:270-275.

24 HwangU,RichardsonL,LivoteE,HarrisB,SpencerN,etal. (2008)Emergency department crowding and decreased quality of paincare.AcadEmergMed15:1248-1255.

25 Pines JM,Hollander JE (2008) Emergencydepartment crowding isassociatedwithpoorcareforpatientswithseverepain.AnnEmergMed51:1-5.

26 Pines JM,ShoferFS, Isserman JA,AbbuhlSB,MillsAM(2010)Theeffectofemergencydepartmentcrowdingonanalgesia inpatientswithbackpainintwohospitals.AcadEmergMed17:276-283.

27 Mills AM, Shofer FS, Chen EH, Hollander JE, Pines JM (2009) Theassociationbetweenemergencydepartmentcrowdingandanalgesiaadministration inacuteabdominalpainpatients.AcadEmergMed16:603-608.

28 Mitchell R, Kelly AM, Kerr D (2009) Does emergency departmentworkloadadverselyinfluencetimelyanalgesia?EmergMedAustralas21:52-58.

29 FeeC,WeberEJ,MaakCA,BacchettiP(2007)Effectofemergencydepartment crowding on time to antibiotics in patients admittedwithcommunity-acquiredpneumonia.AnnEmergMed50:501-509,509.

30 FeeC,WeberEJ,BacchettiP,MaakCA(2011)Effectofemergencydepartment crowding on pneumonia admission care components.AmJManagCare17:269-278.

31 Sikka R, Mehta S, Kaucky C, Kulstad EB (2010) ED crowding isassociatedwith an increasedtime topneumonia treatment.Am JEmergMed28:809-812.

32 PinesJM,LocalioAR,HollanderJE,BaxtWG,LeeH,etal.(2007)Theimpact of emergency department crowding measures on time toantibiotics for patientswith community-acquired pneumonia. AnnEmergMed50:510-516.

33 PinesJM,HollanderJE,LocalioAR,MetlayJP(2006)Theassociationbetweenemergencydepartmentcrowdingandhospitalperformanceonantibiotictimingforpneumoniaandpercutaneous interventionformyocardialinfarction.AcadEmergMed13:873-878.

34 Schull MJ, Vermeulen M, Slaughter G, Morrison L, Daly P (2004)Emergencydepartmentcrowdingandthrombolysisdelaysinacutemyocardialinfarction.AnnEmergMed44:577-585.

35 Kulstad EB, Kelley KM (2009) Overcrowding is associated withdelays inpercutaneouscoronary interventionforacutemyocardialinfarction.IntJEmergMed2:149-154.

36 HarrisB,BaiJC,KulstadEB(2012)Crowdingdoesnotadverselyaffect

Page 6: The Effect of Emergency 1 Department Crowding on Patient Outcomes … · The Effect of Emergency Department Crowding on Patient Outcomes Filippatos George1 and Karasi Evridiki2 1

6 This article is available in: www.hsj.gr/archive

ARCHIVOS DE MEDICINAISSN 1698-9465

2015Vol. 9 No. 1:6

Health Science Journal ISSN 1791-809X

time to percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardialinfarctioninacommunityemergencydepartment.AnnEmergMed59:13-17.

37 ChatterjeeP,CucchiaraBL,LazarciucN,ShoferFS,PinesJM(2011)Emergencydepartmentcrowdingandtimetocareinpatientswithacutestroke.Stroke42:1074-1080.

38 Hong KJ, Shin SD, Song KJ, Cha WC, Cho JS (2013) AssociationbetweenEDcrowdinganddelayinresuscitationeffort.AmJEmergMed31:509-515.

39 PinesJM,PrabhuA,HiltonJA,HollanderJE,DatnerEM(2010)Theeffect of emergency department crowding on length of stay andmedication treatment times in discharged patients with acuteasthma.AcadEmergMed17:834-839.

40 Kulstad EB, Sikka R, Sweis RT, Kelley KM, Rzechula KH (2010)ED overcrowding is associated with an increased frequency ofmedicationerrors.AmJEmergMed28:304-309.

41 Patanwala AE, Warholak TL, Sanders AB, Erstad BL (2010) Aprospective observational study ofmedication errors in a tertiarycareemergencydepartment.AnnEmergMed55:522-526.

42 Epstein SK,HuckinsDS, Liu SW,PallinDJ, SullivanAF, et al. (2012)Emergency department crowding and risk of preventablemedicalerrors.InternEmergMed7:173-180.

43 Ackroyd-Stolarz S, Read GJ, Mackinnon NJ, Kovacs G (2011) Theassociationbetweenaprolongedstayintheemergencydepartmentand adverse events in older patients admitted to hospital: aretrospectivecohortstudy.BMJQualSaf20:564-569.

44 PinesJM,PollackCVJr,DiercksDB,ChangAM,ShoferFS(2009)Theassociationbetweenemergencydepartmentcrowdingandadversecardiovascular outcomes in patients with chest pain. Acad EmergMed16:617-625.

45 Zhou JC, Pan KH, Zhou DY, Zheng SW, Zhu JQ, et al. (2012) Highhospital occupancy is associated with increased risk for patientsboardingintheemergencydepartment.AmJMed125:416.

46 Richardson DB (2006) Increase in patient mortality at 10 daysassociatedwithemergencydepartmentovercrowding.Med JAust184:213-216.

47 Jo1,KimK,LeeJH,RheeJE,KimYJ,etal.(2012)Emergencydepartmentcrowdingisassociatedwith28-daymortalityincommunity-acquiredpneumoniapatients.JInfect64:268-275.

48 SprivulisPC,DaSilvaJA,JacobsIG,FrazerAR,JelinekGA(2006)Theassociation between hospital overcrowding and mortality amongpatientsadmittedviaWesternAustralianemergencydepartments.MedJAust184:208-212.

49 SingerAJ,ThodeHCJr,ViccellioP,PinesJM(2011)Theassociationbetweenlengthofemergencydepartmentboardingandmortality.AcadEmergMed18:1324-1329.

50 Chalfin DB, Trzeciak S, Likourezos A, Baumann BM, Dellinger RP;DELAY-EDstudygroup(2007)Impactofdelayedtransferofcriticallyill patients from the emergency department to the intensive careunit.CritCareMed35:1477-1483.

51 GuttmannA,SchullMJ,VermeulenMJ,StukelTA(2011)Associationbetween waiting times and short term mortality and hospitaladmissionafterdeparturefromemergencydepartment:populationbasedcohortstudyfromOntario,Canada.BMJ342:d2983.

52 Hong YC, Chou MH, Liu EH, Hsiao CT, Kuan JT, et al. (2009) TheeffectofprolongedEDstayonoutcomeinpatientswithnecrotizingfasciitis.AmJEmergMed27:385-390.

53 Diercks DB, Roe MT, Chen AY, Peacock WF, Kirk JD, et al. (2007)Prolonged emergency department stays of non-ST-segment-elevationmyocardial infarctionpatientsareassociatedwithworseadherence to theAmerican College of Cardiology/AmericanHeartAssociation guidelines for management and increased adverseevents.AnnEmergMed50:489-496.

54 SunBC,HsiaRY,WeissRE,ZingmondD,LiangLJ,etal.(2013)Effectofemergencydepartmentcrowdingonoutcomesofadmittedpatients.AnnEmergMed61:605-611.

55 ShenYC,HsiaRY(2011)Associationbetweenambulancediversionandsurvivalamongpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarction.JAMA305:2440-2447.

56 Begley CE, Chang Y, Wood RC, Weltge A (2004) Emergencydepartmentdiversionandtraumamortality:evidencefromhouston,Texas.JTrauma57:1260-1265.

57 Fatovich DM (2005) Effect of ambulance diversion on patientmortality:howaccessblockcansaveyourlife.MedJAust183:672-673.

58 Sinatra R (2010) Causes and consequences of inadequatemanagementofacutepain.PainMed11:1859-1871.

59 YahavD,LeiboviciL,GoldbergE,BisharaJ,PaulM(2013)Timetofirstantibiotic dose for patients hospitalisedwith community-acquiredpneumonia.IntJAntimicrobAgents41:410-413.

60 Bordon J,AlibertiS,DuvvuriP,WiemkenT,PeyraniP,etal. (2013)Earlyadministrationofthefirstantimicrobialsshouldbeconsidereda marker of optimal care of patients with community-acquiredpneumoniaratherthanapredictorofoutcomes.IntJInfectDis17:e293-298.

61 YuKT,WyerPC(2008)Evidence-basedemergencymedicine/criticallyappraised topic. Evidence behind the 4-hour rule for initiation ofantibiotic therapy in community-acquired pneumonia. Ann EmergMed51:651-662.

62 MoskopJC,SklarDP,GeidermanJM,SchearsRM,BookmanKJ(2009)Emergency department crowding, part 1--concept, causes, andmoralconsequences.AnnEmergMed53:605-611.