The Effect of Microwave Incinerated Rice Husk Ash on the Compressive and Bond Strength of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete

  • Published on
    01-Jun-2018

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Transcript

  • 8/9/2019 The Effect of Microwave Incinerated Rice Husk Ash on the Compressive and Bond Strength of Fly Ash Based Geopo

    1/9

    The effect of microwave incinerated rice husk ash on the compressive and

    bond strength of fly ash based geopolymer concrete

    Andri Kusbiantoro a,, Muhd Fadhil Nuruddin b, Nasir Shafiq b, Sobia Anwar Qazi b

    a Faculty of Civil Engineering and Earth Resources, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Pahang 26300, Malaysiab Department of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Perak 31750, Malaysia

    h i g h l i g h t s

    " MIRHA is used as the partial replacement for fly ash in geopolymer concrete." It alters the Si/Al in the source material." The elevated temperature presents the optimum curing condition." Improvements on the strengths of fly ash based geopolymer concrete are recorded.

    a r t i c l e i n f o

    Article history:

    Received 23 April 2011Received in revised form 12 June 2012Accepted 13 June 2012Available online 15 July 2012

    Keywords:GeopolymerFly ashRice husk ashCompressive strengthBond strength

    a b s t r a c t

    The development of fly ash and microwave incinerated rice husk ash (MIRHA) blend as the source mate-rial for geopolymer concrete was studied through the observation of the hardened specimen strength.Compressive and bonding strength of the specimen indicate the significance of curing temperature inthe activation of MIRHA particles. The elevated temperature is presenting a suitable condition for rapiddissolution of silicate monomer and oligomer from MIRHA surfaces, which supports the formation ofsupersaturated aluminosilicate solution in geopolymer system. It contributes to the refinement of pores

    structure via the increasing geopolymer gel growth, as observed in the consistent compressive strengthdevelopment of ambient-cured specimen to the oven-cured specimen. Densification of geopolymerframework appears to be the main contributor to the increasing bonding capacity of geopolymer binder.

    2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    1. Introduction

    Geopolymer has progressively enticed many concrete commu-nities around the world due to its revolutionary approach in theproduction of alternative cement binder. Early research on thismaterial was started in 1957 by Glukhovsky which was namedas soil cement, derived from the low basic calcium or calcium-

    free aluminosilicate (clays) and alkali metal solution used in thecement production[1]. It was Davidovits whom then introducedthe first industrial research on geopolymer for the developmentof new binder material using inorganic materials in 1972. Geopoly-mer term was taken referring to its source material which is a geo-logical origin or by product material that is rich in Silicon andAluminum. Its reaction product with alkaline solution possessedan amorphous to semi-crystalline three-dimensional silico-alumi-nate on the material properties[2].

    The most prominent source material in geopolymer is coal com-bustion products, or well known as fly ash. Fly ash is popular due tothe amorphous alumina silica content inside and it is abundantlyavailable in many parts of the world. The total amount of fly ashproduced in the world has now reached 480 million tons annually,while the total OPC production in the world is reaching 3.3 billiontons in 2010 [3,4]. Based on these numbers, there is an obvious gap

    between fly ash and OPC production that will contribute to theeffectiveness of geopolymer in replacing OPC. Therefore additionalsource material is imperative, which will reduce these gaps to alower value.

    Rice husk ash is another pozzolanic material that has not beenextensively studied in geopolymer application. It is generated fromthe combustion process of rice husk. Rice husk itself is anotherissue for environment, due to its abundant amount and capabilityto resist natural degradation. Total world production of rice huskhas reached 130 million tons annually, with 446 thousand tonsof them are produced in Malaysia [5]. The current availabledisposal method is by burning and dumping, which both createenvironmental pollutions. Therefore this paper studied microwave

    0950-0618/$ - see front matter 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.06.064

    Corresponding author. Tel.: +60 95493009; fax: +60 95492998.

    E-mail addresses: andri@ump.edu.my (A. Kusbiantoro), fadhilnuruddin@petronas.com.my (M.F. Nuruddin).

    Construction and Building Materials 36 (2012) 695703

    Contents lists available atSciVerse ScienceDirect

    Construction and Building Materials

    j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / c o n b u i l d m a t

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.06.064mailto:andri@ump.edu.mymailto:fadhilnuruddin@petronas.com.mymailto:fadhilnuruddin@petronas.com.myhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.06.064http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09500618http://www.elsevier.com/locate/conbuildmathttp://www.elsevier.com/locate/conbuildmathttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09500618http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.06.064mailto:fadhilnuruddin@petronas.com.mymailto:fadhilnuruddin@petronas.com.mymailto:andri@ump.edu.myhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.06.064
  • 8/9/2019 The Effect of Microwave Incinerated Rice Husk Ash on the Compressive and Bond Strength of Fly Ash Based Geopo

    2/9

    incinerated rice husk ash (MIRHA), an alternative material that hasgood pozzolanic reactivity, to be included in the geopolymer mix-ture. MIRHA is produced from the microwave incineration processof rice husk. By utilizing this ash into concrete mixture, it will con-sume a significant amount of this by-product and contribute to thepreservation of environment quality. To provide a robust confirma-tion in terms of strength performance, geopolymer concretespecimens produced from this combination was assessed via com-pression and pull out testing, supported by the scanning electronmicroscope and energy dispersion X-ray analysis.

    2. Experimental investigation

    2.1. Materials

    Fly Ash in this research was obtained from Manjung Coal-Based Thermal PowerPlant, Malaysia and categorized as Class F fly ash. Chemical oxide content of fly ashis described inTable 1. Fly ash had the particle size distribution detail as follows:d10 at 2.97lm, d50 at 16.54lm, and d90 at 99.21 lm, with BET surfacearea= 4.26m2/g and adsorption average pore width = 41.30 . FESEM image of flyash particle is presented inFig. 1a.

    Microwave Incinerated Rice Husk Ash (MIRHA) was obtained from the inciner-ation process of rice husk with UTP-Microwave Incinerator in 800 C incinerationtemperature. In order to increase its fineness, MIRHA was then ground in ball mill

    for2000 cycles. The chemical oxidecontentof MIRHAis shown in Table1, withpar-ticle size distribution detail as follows: d10at 3.01lm,d50at16.76 lm, andd90at60.53 lm. MIRHA had BET surface area of 67.33 m2/g and adsorption average porewidth of 70.74 . FESEM image of MIRHA particles is presented inFig. 1b.

    MIRHA was introduced in the mixture to replace certain portionsof fly ash con-tent as the source material. It was purposed to alter the SiO2Al2O3 ratio in thesource material hence improvement on the interfacial transition zone and strengthproperties of geopolymer concrete were expected. Complete mixture compositionsare described in Table 2. Activation of these source materials were completedthrough the inclusion of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and sodium silicate (Na2SiO3)solution. One kg of 8 M NaOH solution was prepared by diluting 297 gr NaOH pel-lets with 703 gr water. NaOH solid used was in 99% purities and Na2SiO3 hadMs= 2.0 (Na2O: 14.73%; SiO2: 29.75%, and H2O: 55.52%). To prevent the excess heatfrom NaOH dissolution, these solutions were prepared 1 h before mixing process.

    To observe the effect of temperature on the geopolymer concrete properties,three curing regimes were conducted in this research. The geopolymer concretespecimens were exposed to three different conditions, which were ambient, exter-

    nal exposure, and oven curing. In ambient curing, the concrete specimens wereplaced at the shaded area with maximum temperature 35 + 1 C. These specimenswere constantly protected from direct sunlight and rainfall until the testing days.Meanwhile concrete specimens in external exposure curing were placed in a plasticchamber placed at a non-protected area, exposed to direct sunlight yet protectedfrom rainfall. The maximum temperature in external exposure method reached5 5 + 1 C. All these specimens were kept in their respective curing regime untilthe testing day. For comparison purpose, strength of hardened specimens was alsomeasured based on the oven curing exposure. Freshly cast specimens were given1 h delay time before they were placed into the oven. The specimens were placedin electrical oven with temperature 65 C for 24 h. After 24 h, all specimens in therespective curing conditions were de-moulded and placed back at their initial posi-tion, except for oven curing specimens where they were re-placed at the ambientcondition.

    Geopolymer concrete specimens were then tested on their compressivestrength and bonding capacity after 3, 7, and 28 curing days. Pull out test was doneto determine the bonding capacity of geopolymer concrete through direct tension

    force. The pull-out specimen was prepared by setting a steel bar 150 mm into

    cylindrical cast fresh concrete, with cylinder size 100 mm in diameter and200 mm in height. This test was conducted on Universal Testing Machine with2000KN in capacity. Geopolymer paste specimens were also analyzed for theirmineral characterization using energy dispersion X-ray analysis (EDX). Geopolymerpaste was selected to minimize the disruption of aggregate particles on the validityof geopolymer framework analysis. For EDX analysis, the data collection was con-ductedon the crushed geopolymer specimen that was magnified1000times in FES-EM Zeiss Supra 55VP instruments.

    3. Result and discussion

    3.1. Compressive strength

    Compressive strength development of hardened geopolymer

    concrete is the basic indicator to the performance of alternativesource material, since it provides a fundamental description onthe quality of geopolymerization products.Figs. 24 show the com-pressive strength result of hardened geopolymer concrete with 0%,3%, and 7% MIRHA inclusion respectively. It is obviously presentedin these figures how the contribution of MIRHA to the fly ash basedgeopolymer concrete strength development is limited to certainstage. The increment of temperature from ambient and externalexposure curing presents a consistent strength development trend.The excessive amount of water in ambient-cured specimens hashindered the polycondensation process and resulted in a lowercompressive strength than external exposure curing. It is a notori-ous fact that hydroxide activity is significantly affected by theexcessive water content in the geopolymer concrete system[6].

    The absorptive characteristic of MIRHA reduces the water con-tent in geopolymer system through water absorption mechanism.

    Table 1

    Oxide composition percentage of fly ash and MIRHA particle.

    Oxide Percentage (%)

    Fly ash MIRHA

    Al2O3 29.1 0.45SiO2 51.7 89.34P2O5 1.7 2.58SO3 1.5 0.90K2O 1.6 4.98CaO 8.84 0.76TiO2 0.702 0.02Fe2O3 4.76 0.40SrO 0.109 Mn2O3

    MgO 0.49

    Fig. 1. FESEM images of fly ash and MIRHA particles.

    696 A. Kusbiantoro et al. / Construction and Building Materials 36 (2012) 695703

  • 8/9/2019 The Effect of Microwave Incinerated Rice Husk Ash on the Compressive and Bond Strength of Fly Ash Based Geopo

    3/9

    A rapid transportation of hydroxyl ion on to fly ash particle in-creases the dissolution of aluminosilicate species and consequentlythe gelation of supersaturated aluminosilicate solution. Variationsin the dissolution and polycondensation rate due to differences inthe curing temperature and hydroxide ion activities result in a dis-parate geopolymer gel production rate. Due to the differences inthe solubility degree between fly ash and MIRHA, replacement offly ash with MIRHA remarkably decreases the dissolution and poly-condensation rate of aluminosilicate precursors. However, at alower gelation rate in ambient curing, the addition of MIRHA con-tributes to the increasing compressive strength through the reduc-tion on the water filled pores.

    Higher surface tension possessed by rough MIRHA particles isunderstood to trap the moisture from being rapidly dissipated.The water expelled from the geopolymer matrix during polycon-densation process is also absorbed by MIRHA specimen and it as-sists in the formation of discontinuous nano-pores within thematrix. It clarifies the higher strength development retained byMIRHA based geopolymer concrete in ambient curing. Theimprovement on the compressive strength of MIRHA based geo-polymer concrete is up to 22.34% higher than non-MIRHA based

    specimen in ambient curing. Meanwhile, inclusion of MIRHA inthe external exposure curing regime has adversely affected thefly ash based geopolymer concrete strength performance.

    An anomaly trend is shown by MIRHA contained specimenwhen it is exposed to the external exposure curing. Different fromambient curing where MIRHA particles contribute to the compres-sive strength improvement, in external exposure curing it inconsis-tently deteriorates the fly ash based geopolymer concrete strength.A barrier appears to prevail in fly ashMIRHA based geopolymermatrix when the systemis exposed to the external exposure curingregime. Rapid dissolution and polycondensation of fly ash in non-MIRHA based geopolymer concrete is completely supported by theelevated temperature. A reduction in the fly ash amount by MIRHAinclusion has delayed the dissolution of aluminosilicate precursors

    from source material which also affected the gelation process ofsupersaturated aluminosilicate solution. Different silicate featurebetween MIRHA, fly ash, and soluble silicate has considerably con-

    tributed to this condensation process.It appears that MIRHA particles possess slightly different sili-cate structure, hence when the SiO2/Al2O3ratio is altered to a high-er ratio; the species of silicate that has large cyclic structurehinders the polycondensation process [7]. It is well understoodthat in polycondensation, the monomeric Si(OH)4and larger linearsilicate anions only react with uncomplexed tetrahedral aluminateAlOH4 [8]. The presence of large silicate cyclic structure inhibitsthe kinetics and reduces the production rate of geopolymer gel.Different from ambient curing, acceleration on the hydrolysis-dis-solution-polycondensation process in external exposure-curedspecimen is sufficient to fill the existing pores. Rapid dehumidifica-tion assisted by the elevated temperature has reduced the disrup-tion of condensation process by the expelled water.

    It elucidates the eminence of non-MIRHA based geopolymerconcrete over MIRHA based specimens in the performance of

    Table 2

    Detail of mixture proport...

Recommended

View more >