Upload
oswald-hill
View
239
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The experiences of Chinese students entering top-up courses: comparing
students from UK-style HND courses and those from Chinese diploma courses.
Dave Burnapp & Wei Zhao.Northampton Business School,The University of Northampton.
A comparison study: TNE group.
• UK-validated, e.g. SQA or BTEC HNDs.
• Taught in English language.
• UK-style teaching and assessment approaches.
• E.g. SQA HND course, described by the Chinese Ministry of Education as being part of a five-year framework.
A comparison study: Chinese group.
• Dazhuan diploma students moving to top-up degrees, or in some cases degree students moving to Masters courses.
• Taught in Chinese.
• Chinese-style teaching and assessment approaches.
Aims.
• To explore changes which relate to linguistic, social, and academic competences.
• In addition, intercultural adaptation is often described in three aspects:
– affective, which relates to liking or not liking;
– behavioural, which relates to knowing what to do in a situation;
– and cognitive, which relates to understanding the requirements of the situation.
What is the ‘trajectory of adjustment’?
1. Either, students experience a culture shock stage soon after arrival followed by recovery, which would give a U-curve trajectory.
2. Or, they begin with anxieties but then follow a rising learning curve.
• Possible that the trajectory of adjustment for these two groups is different, hence that the requirements for provision of support will be different.
Methods.
• Used mixed methods of a quantitative attitude survey, as well as qualitative data gathered from focus groups and interviews.
• The first data collection was carried out during the students’ induction period in August 2009.
• This was then repeated four months later at the end of their first term on top-up or Masters courses.
Cognitive aspect
Behavioural aspect
Affective aspect
Linguistic competence
E.g. I have a good knowledge of English.
E.g. I am able to express my ideas clearly in English.
E.g. I enjoy speaking in English.
Socialcompetence
E.g. I know a lot about daily life in England.
E.g. I will be able to do things like shopping without difficulty.
E.g. I am looking forward to knowing more about English life.
Academic competence
E.g. I have a clear idea about the methods of education in England.
E.g. I will be able to finish my assignments easily.
E.g. Studying in England will be an exciting experience.
Quantitative survey August 2009.
• The Chinese system group rated themselves more highly in 32 of the 36 items, significant differences in seven cases.
– Studying in England will be an exciting experience.
– I write well in English.
– I know different types of English, both formal and informal.
• (list continued on next slide).
Significant differences continued.
– I will be able to do things life shopping without difficulty.
– I will be able to follow my lectures.
– I will get to know English people easily.
– I will learn a lot from using different study methods.
Focus Groups September 2009.
• Because the confidence of the TNE students was lower than those who had studied in the Chinese system the focus groups explored these ideas.
– Possibly the Chinese system students only had vicarious knowledge of the UK system.
– Possibly the TNE group had their own direct experiences, both positive and negative, hence a form of behavioural insideness , and their lower expectations might have been more realistic.
TNE students qualitative findings.
• Had difficulties in learning and using English as the language of instruction on their TNE course.
• Had developed survival strategies: frequent use of Chinese to clarify and scaffold their learning.
• Recognised that their programmes demanded different approaches to study; differences in logical thinking, the use of discussions, the need to present different view-points, assessments, time-management skills, and the need to illustrate theory with practical applied examples.
TNE qualitative findings, continued.
• Although they had lower confidence than the Chinese system students, they were proud of their achievements, and confident that they had been well-prepared for their top-up degrees.
• Their major concern was English language proficiency.
• On arrival in the UK had new difficulties in the social domain.
Chinese system group qualitative findings.
• Concerning educational methods, they reported little use of discussions in China, strong emphasis on lectures which supplied very detailed knowledge.
• A belief that Chinese teachers provide more detail, an approach which some described as boring.
• A student of art described a difference between an emphasis on detailed technique in the Chinese system with an emphasis on theory in the UK system. (Continued on next slide).
Chinese system qualitative findings, continued.
• A heavy reliance on passing examinations. • A shared view that in China it is hard to enter
university but easy to graduate, (and that this is opposite in the UK).
• Aware that plagiarism and referencing are important in the UK, disagreement about importance of this in the Chinese system.
• Had experienced difficulties concerning the use of English language in initial social encounters when they arrived in the UK.
Quantitative survey January 2010
• The Chinese system group higher in 19 items: the TNE group higher in 17. Significant differences in 3. TNE group higher in 2 items:
– I can read English newspapers with little difficulty.
– I know different types of English both formal and informal.
• The Chinese system group higher in 1 item:
– I will learn a lot from using different study methods.
Changes over time.
• Generally a lowering of confidence, which could be explained by ‘regression to the mean’, so here only report those instances where there was an increase in confidence.
• Most increases felt by the students who had studied on TNE programmes (ten items as compared to four items for the Chinese system group).
• These increases were mostly related to linguistic followed by social competences and in cognitive followed by behavioural aspects.
Interviews January 2010.
• Did the Chinese system group have a period of anxiety after their initial feeling of excitement?
• What were the experiences of the TNE group?
• To question both groups about the accuracy of their previous feelings of insideness:
– The Chinese system students’ vicarious knowledge of the demands of the UK system.
– The authenticity of the TNE students’ experiences of the UK system whilst in China been.
Chinese system qualitative findings.
• Main anxiety was how to do written assessments, completely different from the methods previously used in the China.
– Expected formats.
– Need for referencing.
• Level of English cause difficulties, both in study and daily life.
• But at the time of the interview were feeling more confident about succeeding, getting used to the study methods in the UK education.
TNE group qualitative findings
• Main anxiety was understanding assignment requirements, in particular relating to research and using correct referencing methods.
• Level of English.
• Previously had used more Chinese than English information, had structured ideas in Chinese, and then translated.
• Disagreement about necessity of referencing some reported that referencing had, or had not, been expected.
Discussion and conclusions.
• Guides to autonomous research/referencing are given, but the students fail to notice them.
• This concerns cultural change, a trajectory over time, not a transformation achieved in induction, not knowledge lacks. Hence responses should focus on techniques of assisting cultural change.
• Chinese system students trajectory can perhaps best be figured as a U-curve.
• For the TNE students the increase in confidence suggests a trajectory of a rising learning curve.
Discussion and conclusions.
• Cannot assume that TNE courses are fully authentic, possible to pass (if not to excel) via adopting a set of survival strategies, less likely to succeed in the progression courses such as top-ups and Masters.
• Timing and methods of support for students: if arrive in a state of optimism, then an initial study preparation course is perhaps not best time, could it be offered at a later time?
• Could such support benefit from using student mentors?
English language.
• The students identify language as their main of weakness: not just concerning formal knowledge of grammar and vocabulary but also the uses of language expected in higher education; the set of skills relating to researching, summarising, and following conventions related to referencing.
• For the students with the HND it is disappointing that after three years of studying a TNE course (the foundation year and the two years of HND) there are still some who seem still to be deferring rather than confronting this requirement.
TNE courses.
• If these aim to allow progression to another country, such as the HNDs in China leading to top-ups in the UK, it is important that the authenticity of the learning experience is given as much weight as the subject specific knowledge.
• To resort to over-scaffolding in order to teach an aspect of the programme (for example a specific aspect of Marketing or of Logistics) may reduce student autonomy and language development which will be essential for them on their progression courses.