Upload
nibaw
View
34
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The Moat Flow Observed in Two Different TRACE-Filters. Horst Balthasar Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam 1 July 2008. Partner involved:. Karin Muglach, ARTEP, NAVAL Research Laboratory. Reasons for these investigations. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
The Moat Flow Observed in Two Different TRACE-Filters
Horst Balthasar Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam
1 July 2008
Partner involved:
Karin Muglach, ARTEP, NAVAL Research Laboratory
Reasons for these investigations
The moat flow is well known. Outflow around sunspots with ´normal´ penumbra of ~300-500 m/s
Moving magnetic features (MMF) with up to 2 km/s.
There are extended polarimetric investigations of a special small sunspot with VTT and THEMIS (see Hauskolloquium 2007).
Question: Can we learn something about the dynamics in and around this sunspot?
Observations
Sunspot NOAA 10886, 27 May 2006Wavelength: TRACE-filters, WL and UV 170 nm. UV is formed next to the temperature minimum.
Cadence: 1 minute, 409 images each. Duration: 6 h 40 m, 00:39 - 07:19 UT
Pixel width: 0.5 arcsec.
Data are corrected for spikes (hot pixel, particle events,....) Solar rotation and TRACE-orbit effects are removed. Solar oscillations are filtered out in WL, but not in UV.
The sunspot AR 10886
27 May 2006 hl=7N, cmd~0
VTT with AO!
combined from spectral continuum of 3 scans
Mean Images
Left: Whitelight Right: UV 170 nm (log)
The magnetic field
Total magnetic field strength derived from the two lines:Upper panel: Si 1078.6 Max: 2180 G Min(PU): 316 GLower panel: Fe 1078.3 Max: 2308 G Min(PU): 423 G
Gamma
Magnetic inclination for
Si 1078.6 (upper panel) and
Fe 1078.3 (lower panel).
The field is less inclined in higher layers.
Mean Images
Left: Whitelight Right: UV 170 nm (log)
Whitelight movie
UV-Movie
Local Correlation Tracking
Local correlation tracking (LCT) is a well-established technique to determine proper motions.
Select a subfield in one image, identify it by best correlation in another image.
Here: delta t = 8 min.
LCT Results
LCT delivers horizontal velocities in Cartesian coordinates, 401 maps each.These values are transformed into a radial and a tangential component.Averaging all 401 maps.
LCT 4
Box width: 4 Pixel
Upper panels: WL
Lower: UV
Left: radial component,
Right: tangential component.
LCT 4
Box width: 4 Pixel
Subfield 220 x 200
Upper panels: WL
Lower: UV
Left: radial component,
Right: tangential component.
LCT 10
Box width: 10 Pixel
Upper panels: WL
Lower: UV
Left: radial component,
Right: tangential component.
LCT 10
Box width: 10 Pixel
Subfield 220x 200
Upper panels: WL
Lower: UV
Left: radial component,
Right: tangential component.
Radial dependence
Intensity, radial and tangetialvelocity component, averaged over azimuth. Solid line: whitelight, dashed: UV 170 nm.Dotted: error ranges.(for boxsize 4 pixels)
Radial dependence
Same as before but for
boxsize 10.
Summary
We see an outflow everywhere in the moat. For the inner moat we find higher velocities in UV, and vice
versa in the outer moat. Both outflow curves, WL and UV, reach zero at the same
distance from the spot center. The velocities are higher if a larger tracking box is selected. Compared to other spots, this moat is rather extended
(~4 radii)
Outlook
Comparison with other methods ( Fisher & Welsch, or Bovelet & Wiehr).
New observations with 2D-spectropolarimeters. Need of higher spatial resolution GREGOR