Upload
nicholas-j
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Clinical Research
DepartmenUniversity, Co
CorrespondHospital, ColuFort [email protected]
Ann Vasc Surghttp://dx.doi.or� 2014 Elsevi
Manuscript re
2013; publishe
The Vascular Surgeon’s Experience withAdrenal Venous Sampling for the Diagnosisof Primary Hyperaldosteronism
Jeffrey J. Siracuse, Heather L. Gill, Irene Epelboym, Noelle C. Clarke, Nii-Kabu Kabutey,
In-Kyong Kim, James A. Lee, and Nicholas J. Morrissey, New York, New York
Background: Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is used to distinguish between bilateral idio-pathic hyperplasia and a functional adrenal tumor in patients with hyperaldosteronism. Success-ful sampling from both adrenal veins is necessary for lateralization and may require more than 1procedure. AVS has traditionally been performed by interventional radiologists; however, ourgoal was to examine the outcomes when performed by a vascular surgeon.Methods: All patients with a diagnosis of hyperaldosteronism were referred for AVS regardlessof imaging findings. Cortisol and aldosterone levels were measured in blood samples from bothadrenal veins. Postoperative analysis of intraoperative laboratory values before and after cosyn-tropin administration determined successful cannulation and sampling of each vein.Results: Between 2007 and 2012, 53 patients underwent AVS by one vascular surgeon. Theaverage age was 54 and 63% were men. Our success rate increased with experience, becauseduring the earlier years (2007e2010) primary and secondary success rates were 58% and 68%,respectively compared with later years (2011e2012) when primary and secondary success rateswere 82% and 95%, respectively (P < 0.05). Results of AVS altered localization of diseasecompared with what had been anticipated based on preoperative imaging and thus influencedsurgical decision making in 47% of cases.Conclusions: AVS is an important procedure in the work up of hyperaldosteronism to helpidentify and localize metabolically active tumors. It is an additional area in medicine where avascular surgeon can lend expertise. Success with the procedure improves with experienceand should be performed by high volume surgeons.
INTRODUCTION
Primary hyperaldosteronism results from abnor-
mally high secretion of aldosterone that is not sup-
pressed by the renineangiotensin pathway and is
t of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbiallege of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
ence to: Jeffrey J. Siracuse, MD, New York-Presbyterianmbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, 161ton Avenue, New York, NY 10032, USA; E-mail:rg
2014; -: 1–5g/10.1016/j.avsg.2013.10.009er Inc. All rights reserved.
ceived: August 1, 2013; manuscript accepted: October 9,
d online: ---.
generally caused by an aldosterone-secreting adrenal
adenoma, bilateral adrenal hyperplasia, or unilateral
gland hyperplasia in rare cases.1 It is now recognized
as the most common cause of secondary hyperten-
sion and can eventually lead to severe hypokalemia
if left untreated.1,2 Therefore, detection of primary
hyperaldosteronism as a cause of hypertension is
particularly important when the patients with pri-
mary hyperaldosteronism are at increased risks for
cardiovascular events, independent of their elevated
blood pressure.3
Traditionally,whenprimaryhyperaldosteronismis
suspectedclinically, the initial screening test is periph-
eral venous aldosteroneerenin ratio. If this is found to
be elevated, cross-sectional abdominal imaging (usu-
ally computed tomography [CT]) is performed in an
1
2 Siracuse et al. Annals of Vascular Surgery
attempt to identify a functional adenoma.2 However,
imaging modalities may not be sufficiently sensitive
or specific todrivemanagementdecisions alone: small
adenomas can be missed and incidental nonfunc-
tional adenomas may be falsely implicated as the
cause of symptoms in patients with bilateral adrenal
hyperplasia.2 Defining the etiology and determining
the laterality of disease are therefore essential in this
setting, as treatment differs substantially; bilateral dis-
ease is managed pharmacologically, whereas patients
with unilateral disease are offered surgical resec-
tion.2,4 Surgical resection can often be done laparos-
copically and is successful in resolving symptoms in
manyof the cases, thusmaking accurate lateralization
of the aldosterone secretion, crucial.5 Adrenal venous
sampling (AVS) is an adjunct diagnostic modality to
cross-sectional imaging; in some scenarios, it can be
more specific and sensitive than for distinguishing
the etiology of primary hyperaldosteronism and ulti-
mately help guide treatment.5e7
AVS can be technically challenging, and often the
rate-limiting step to a successful procedure is the
cannulation and biochemical sampling of the right
adrenal vein. The left adrenal vein exits the superior
surface of the left renal vein near its midportion,
making the cannulation fairly straight forward. In
contrast, the origin of the right adrenal vein is
directly off the inferior vena cava in a posterior
lateral direction without an intervening medium-
sized vein to guide catheter placement. The right ad-
renal vein often lies between the 11th and 12th ribs,
and this can be used as a guide. Also, the identifica-
tion of the kidney on fluoroscopy can help localize
the approximate location. Generally, the catheter
is placed superiorly to the vein facing the contralat-
eral/left side and then it is posteriorly rotated while
withdrawn to seat the catheter in the right adrenal
vein. Then, a gentle small injection of contrast is
used to confirm location while avoiding possible
hematoma.
Given these technical considerations and the sig-
nificant diagnostic value of AVS, it is essential that
this procedure be performed by a highly skilled
physician to ensure optimal circumstances for a
successful outcome. At many institutions, AVS is
performed by interventional radiologists with vary-
ing degrees of success (8e96%). Lowvolume centers
have been shown to have poor results.8,9 At
Columbia University Medical Center, the vascular
surgeons have become the primary referral option
for the endocrinologists and endocrine surgeons.10,11
Interestingly, there is no reported series that de-
scribes the AVS outcomes when performed by
vascular surgeons. Therefore, our specific aim was
to present our experience to demonstrate that our
technical expertise is invaluable in the successful
performance of AVS and that this is an additional
area in medicine where vascular surgeons can lend
expertise.
METHODS
All patients who presented to either the endocrinol-
ogists and/or the endocrine surgeons at Columbia
University Medical Center with suspected primary
hyperaldosteronism were referred to a single
vascular surgeon for AVS regardless of preoperative
imaging. A retrospective review of all cases and out-
comes was performed. Because of diurnal variation,
AVS is always performed as the first procedure of the
day.11 Vascular access is initially obtained through
the right femoral vein. Baseline aldosterone and
cortisol levels are measured in the inferior vena
cava.We used a SIM 1 (CookMedical, Bloomington,
IN) for the right adrenal vein and a SIM 2 (Cook
Medical) catheter for the left adrenal vein. In cases
where we are unsuccessful with these catheters, a
Mickelson catheter (Cook Medical) can be used for
the right side and a 4-French straight glide catheter
for the left side. We use a floppy .03500 guidewire as
our standard wire for this procedure. We confirmed
cannulation with a limited angiogram with a small
amount of contrast. Baseline cortisol and aldosterone
levels were sent from each vein. Gravity drainage
was used to avoid collapsing the vein. Cosyntropin
(250 mg) was administered as a bolus via peripheral
injection over 3e4 minutes. The left and right adre-
nal veins were then resampled. Postoperative anal-
ysis of intraoperative laboratory values before and
after cosyntropin administration determines success-
ful cannulation and sampling of each vein. The ratio
of cortisol concentrations in the adrenal vein to the
inferior vena cava is referred to as the ‘‘cortisol
step-up’’ or the ‘‘sensitivity index’’ (SI) and the
A/C ratios from the adrenal vein samples, higher
(dominant) over lower (nondominant) is called the
‘‘A/C gradient’’ or the ‘‘lateralization index’’ (LI).
As per accepted criteria at most major centers, we
use an SI of >3:1 prestimulation and >5:1 poststim-
ulation to determine successful cannulation. An LI of
>4:1 is necessary to establish laterality, which, if pre-
sent, guides the management algorithm toward sur-
gical resection of a presumed metabolically active
tumor.5,10 Success was primary if there was success-
ful cannulation for the first time and secondary if
an additional procedure was required. We divided
the patients into 2 time periods to determine the
improvement in our success rates with time: 2007e2010 and 2011e2012.
Fig. 1. Primary and secondary success rates of adrenal venous sampling from 2007 to 2010 compared with adrenal
venous sampling from 2011 to 2012.
Vol. -, No. -, - 2014 Surgeon’s experience with adrenal venous sampling 3
RESULTS
Between 2007 and 2012, 53 patients underwent
AVS. In the first time period (2007e2010), there
were 37 patients and there were 16 from 2011e2012. The average age in this cohort was 54 and
63% were men. Preoperative imaging was normal
in 20% of patients, 65% of patients had suspicious
unilateral findings e either thickening or a sus-
pected mass, and 15% had suspicious findings bilat-
erally. All patients were hypertensive, and 67% had
been diagnosed with hypokalemia.
Our success rate increased with experience. Dur-
ing the earlier years (2007e2010), primary and
secondary success rates were 58% and 68%, respec-
tively, compared with later years (2011e2012)
when primary and secondary success rates were
82% and 95% (P < 0.05), respectively (Fig. 1). In
all cases, procedural failure was secondary to
inability to cannulate the right adrenal vein. Results
of AVS altered localization of disease compared with
preoperative imaging, and thus influenced surgical
decision making in 47% of cases (Fig. 2). All the
cases, where the cross-sectional imaging had identi-
fied no adrenal gland abnormalities (normal) and
bilateral abnormalities, had their laterality changed
after AVS. In the group of patients who had preop-
erative imaging suspicious for unilateral disease,
AVSwas discordant 27%of the time: 71%had bilat-
eral hyperaldosteronism and 29% had a lesion
contralateral to the side suggested by imaging. For
all patients with suspected bilateral disease on
imaging who had successful cannulation, AVS
demonstrated unilateral disease. In addition, func-
tional disease was identified by AVS in all patients
with normal preoperative imaging who had a suc-
cessful cannulation: 16% had bilateral and 83%
had unilateral disease.
As of most recent follow-up, 91% of patients who
underwent AVS had an operation. In this group,
88% had an adrenocortical adenoma on final pa-
thology and the remainder nodular hyperplasia.
Ten patients whose final pathology demonstrated
adenoma had preoperative imaging that did not
demonstrate a lateral lesion. All patients who had
resection had resolution of their hypokalemia and
resolution or improvement in hypertension. There
was no postoperative complication from the AVS,
and all patients were discharged home the same day.
DISCUSSION
AVS is an essential procedure in the work up of pri-
mary hyperaldosteronism, because it aids the identi-
fication and localization of metabolically active
tumors with a high degree of sensitivity, specificity,
and accuracy. Our study demonstrates that the re-
sults of AVS altered care in nearly half of the patients
when compared with what would be done based
on preoperative imaging alone. In our hands,
procedure-related complication rate was 0, and we
were able to perform AVS with excellent primary
and secondary success rates in the last 2 years. This
was significantly better than the first part of the
study period (2007e2010). As it is the case with
Fig. 2. Preoperative cross-sectional imaging and subse-
quent alteration of lateralization after adrenal venous
sampling (AVS). Cross-sectional imaging lateralization
in parentheses. All the cases, where the cross-sectional
imaging had identified no adrenal gland abnormalities
(normal) and bilateral abnormalities, had their laterality
changed after AVS.
4 Siracuse et al. Annals of Vascular Surgery
many technically demanding procedures, there is a
clear volume-outcome relationship with respect to
successful cannulation, and thus, we advocate that
it should be performed by a high number of sur-
geons. This is also consistent with previous reports
of low volume centers having success rates as low
as 8%.8 Our primary and overall successful bilateral
adrenal vein cannulation in the later period is com-
parable with that reported by higher volume inter-
ventional radiologists.8,9,11e15
In some instances, where bilateral cannulation
was not performed and which was related to not
cannulating the right adrenal vein in all cases, we
noted the presence of an inferior accessory hepatic
vein (in some cases, as close as 4 mm to the right ad-
renal vein) as a possible culprit; this has been previ-
ously demostrated.16 One possible way to improve
on this would be to have a rapid assay for intraoper-
ative assessment of cortisol levels and thereby have
real-time confirmation of correct catheter position.
Indeed, some groups have demonstrated improve-
ment in right adrenal vein cannulation from 73%
to as high as 97% using this technique.16 We plan
on adopting this method in the near future, because
it would allow us to attempt right-sided cannulation
immediately should we find that initial catheteriza-
tion was unsuccessful, instead of subjecting the pa-
tient to a repeat procedure. The discordant results
between preoperative imaging (CT/magnetic reso-
nance imaging) and the AVS,most likely, are related
to the inability of preoperative imaging to distin-
guish between a functional and nonfunctional
adenoma and to the inability to detect very small
metabolically active tumors.
Our study suggests that AVS can be safely and
successfully performed by an experienced vascular
surgeon; however, it is limited by its retrospective
nature. Patient selection was based on referral by
endocrinologists and endocrine surgeons, which
potentially introduced bias as this population was
more likely to have suspected surgical versus
nonsurgical disease. This, however, does not affect
the probability of technical success and is therefore
less relevant to our final conclusions. All procedures
were performed by a single surgeon, thus poten-
tially limiting the generalizability of our findings.
However, we demonstrated at a high level of signif-
icance that success increases with experience, which
is applicable in a broad practice setting.
AVS is a crucial step in the work up of primary
hyperaldosteronism because it allows the physician
to distinguish between surgically treatable unilat-
eral disease and bilateral disease that should be
managed pharmacologically. As vascular surgeons,
we were able to successfully contribute to the care
of these patients; however, success is dependent
on experience and that should ultimately guide
referral to the specialist performing the procedure.
REFERENCES
1. Carey RM. Primary aldosteronism. J Surg Oncol 2012;106:
575e9.
2. Funder J, Carey R, Fardella C, et al. Case detection, diagnosis,
and treatment of patients with primary aldosteronism: an
Vol. -, No. -, - 2014 Surgeon’s experience with adrenal venous sampling 5
Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. Clin Endocrinol
Metab 2008;93:3266e81.3. Milliez P, Girerd X, Plouin PF, et al. Evidence for an
increased rate of cardiovascular events in patients with pri-
mary aldosteronism. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1243e8.4. Nwariaku FE, Miller BS, Auchus R, et al. Primary hyperal-
dosteronism: effect of adrenal vein sampling on surgical
outcome. Arch Surg 2006;141:497e502.
5. Waldmann J, Maurer L, Holler J, et al. Outcome of surgery
for primary hyperaldosteronism. World J Surg 2011;35:
2422e7.
6. Kempers MJ, Lenders JW, van Outheusden L, et al. System-
atic review: diagnostic procedures to differentiate unilateral
from bilateral adrenal abnormality in primary aldoste-
ronism. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:329e37. Review.
7. Salem V, Hopkins TG, El-Gayar H, et al. Adrenal venous
sampling as a diagnostic procedure for primary hyperaldos-
teronism: experience from a tertiary referral centre. Hor-
mones (Athens) 2012;11:151e9.
8. Vonend O, Ockenfels N, Gao X, et al., German Conn’s Reg-
istry. Adrenal venous sampling: evaluation of the German
Conn’s registry. Hypertension 2011;57:990e5.
9. Young WF, Stanson AW. What are the keys to successful
adrenal venous sampling (AVS) in patients with primary
aldosteronism? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2009;70:14e7.
10. Burshteyn M, Cohen DL, Fraker DL, et al. Adrenal venous
sampling for primaryhyperaldosteronism inpatientswith con-
current chronic kidney disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013;24:
726e33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2013.01.496.
11. Harvey A, Pasieka JL, Kline G, et al. Modification of the pro-
tocol for selective adrenal venous sampling results in both a
significant increase in the accuracy and necessity of the pro-
cedure in the management of patients with primary hyper-
aldosteronism. Surgery 2012;152:643e9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2012.07.007. discussion 649-51.
12. Young WF, Stanson AW, Thompson GB, et al. Role for adre-
nal venous sampling in primary aldosteronism. Surgery
2004;136:1227e35.13. Oh EM, Lee KE, Yoon K, et al. Value of adrenal venous sam-
pling for lesion localization in primary aldosteronism. World
J Surg 2012;36:2522e7.14. Trerotola SO, Smoger DL, Cohen DL, et al. The inferior
accessory hepatic vein: an anatomic landmark in adrenal
vein sampling. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011;22:1306e11.
15. Auchus RJ, Michaelis C, Wians FH Jr, et al. Rapid cortisol as-
says improve the success rate of adrenal vein sampling for
primary aldosteronism. Ann Surg 2009;249:318e21.
16. Iacobone M, Citton M, Viel G, et al. Unilateral adrenal
hyperplasia: a novel cause of surgically correctable primary
hyperaldosteronism. Surgery 2012;152:1248e55.