28
Theoretical Framework Science & Values Chris Borgmeier, PhD Portland State University

Theoretical Framework Science & Values

  • Upload
    molimo

  • View
    62

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Theoretical Framework Science & Values. Chris Borgmeier, PhD Portland State University. Questions. How should special educators make decisions about choosing practices to support student needs? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Theoretical FrameworkScience & Values

Chris Borgmeier, PhDPortland State University

Page 2: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Questions• How should special educators make decisions about choosing

practices to support student needs?

• Why are research, theoretical frameworks and data each important for guiding decision making and choosing professional practices in special education?

• How does research inform practice?

• How do I identify research based practices when I need interventions for a student challenge?

Page 3: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Research Based Theoretical Framework

• What if there isn’t really a research-based curriculum or intervention for the individual needs of my student?– No random control trials; no group research– Look to single case research

• Application of Research Based Principles• Grounding in a sound theoretical framework

Page 4: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Behavioral or Learning TheoryAssumptions of Behavioral Theory• Behavior is Learned• Focus on the observable and measurable• Behavior is related to the environment in which it occurs• Behavior serves a purpose• Focus on how environmental variables can be manipulated to effect changes in

behavior & learning• Measure student outcomes & learning

• Educational approaches that have emerged from behaviorism include:– applied behavior analysis– Functional assessment– curriculum based measurement and progress monitoring, and– Direct instruction have emerged from this model– Discrete Trial Training– Modeling, shaping, fading, reinforcement, contract, extinction, etc.

Page 5: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

RTI & SW-PBIS

Effective Instruction PBS

Conceptual Foundations

Behaviorism

ABA

Laws of Behavior

Applied Behavioral Technology

Social Validity

All Students

Page 6: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Foundations of Behavior

Page 7: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Behavior

• Identify the Target Behavior– Desired Behavior or Non-desired Behavior

• Behavior must be identified so that it is observable & measurable– Define the behavior so that someone else could go

into the room and both of you could measure the behavior without question

Page 8: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Operational Definition

EXAMPLESWhat the Behavior Looks Like

NON-EXAMPLESWhat the Behavior Does NOT Look Like

Provide a range of examples •try to provide examples that delineate the boundaries of what the behavior looks like

Provide a range of non-examples

• try to provide examples that delineate the boundaries of what the behavior does not looks like

Behavioral Definition: Observable & Measurable definition

Page 9: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Operational Definition

EXAMPLESWhat the Behavior Looks Like

NON-EXAMPLESWhat the Behavior Does NOT Look Like

Student is:• Sitting at desk working with feet on floor and hands on work•Standing in line with hands at side and without bumping into other students•Sitting on floor and gently nudges another student by accident•Teacher asks students to hand out books to class•Playing tag at recess and gently tags another person to be it

Student is:•Kicking peer under the desk or poking the peer to get their attention•Hold on to another students arm so they can’t get away from them in line•Purposefully run into or push a student sitting next to you on the floor•Throws a pencil at another student when the student needs a pencil•Chases a peer during recess and touches them after the peer asks you to stop

Hands, Feet and Objects to Self: Student does not touch other students with their hands, feet or objects, with intent to hurt, bother or get peers attention at inappropriate times

Page 10: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

ABC’s of Understanding BehaviorOperant Conditioning

• What happens before (A or antecedent) the

behavior occurs? – Trigger

• What is the behavior (B)?• What happens after (C or consequence) the

behavior occurs? – Response or Outcome of the Behavior

A B C

Page 11: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Antecedents What triggers the behavior?

• What happens immediately preceding the problem/target behavior?

• What triggers the behavior, be specific...– What activity?– What peers?– What tasks?– Describe in detail

• If you wanted to set up the student to engage in the problem behavior, what would you have do?

Page 12: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Consequence What is the response to the behavior?

• What happens immediately following the behavior?– How do peers respond?– How do the adults respond?– What are the consequences for the student?– How many times out of 10 do each of these responses

occur following the problem behavior?

• What is the student gaining as a result of engaging in the behavior? – How is it paying off for the student?

Page 13: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Learning

A B C

Student Learns through repeated experience, that under these specific Antecedent conditions, if I engage in this Behavior, I can expect this Consequence

Page 14: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Learning & ABC

A B CStudent is asked to do a math problem in front of the class

Student tries to do the problem at the board, but struggles

Peers laugh at student and one says aloud, “that one is so easy”

NEXT DAYStudent is asked to do a math problem in front of the class

What happens today???

Page 15: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Reinforcing Consequence

AB CIf the consequence is rewarding/desired, the subject

learns the behavior is functional for getting what they want

Behavior Increases in the Future

Rewarding or Desired Consequence

Page 16: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Punishing Consequence

A B CIf the consequence is punishing/undesired, the subject

learns the behavior is not functional for getting what they want

Behavior Decreases in the Future

Punishing or Undesired Consequence

Page 17: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

ABC’s of InstructionAcross the Continuum of Learners

Antecedent Behavior Consequence

Instruction Prompt Student Response Teacher Feedback

Mainstream “What is the capital of Sweden?”…. Bueller, Bueller

Student thinks “Stockholm”

Sporadic verbal praiseStudent self reinforcement “I got it right!”

Direct Instruction Reading

Showing card with word “cat” – saying “this word is ‘cat’, what word?”

“cat”

“c-ar”

Yes – that word is cat;

No, this word is catSignificant Disabilities

“Choosing food at lunch”

Most to least prompting-physical guidance (hand over hand)-Physical-Gestural -verbal

Student ResponseReinforce response-tangible reinforcer-verbal praise-access to natural reinforcer “get lunch”

DIFFERENCES across Continuum- # of trials to mastery- explicitness of instruction

Page 18: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Reinforcing Consequence

AB CIf the consequence is rewarding/desired, the subject

learns the behavior is functional for getting what they want

Behavior Increases in the Future

Rewarding or Desired Consequence

Page 19: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

A-B-CA-B-C

Page 20: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

A-B-CA-B-C

Page 21: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

A-B-CA-B-C

Instruction & Support

Student Independence

Page 22: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Phases of Learning/TeachingAlberto & Troutman, 2009

• Acquisition – student’s ability to perform a newly learned skill/response to some criterion of accuracy

• Fluency – describe the rate at which students accurately perform a response; learner begins to build speed & efficiency in use of the skill or knowledge (but may not remember skill/knowledge over time without prompting)

• Maintenance – student is able to recall & use the skill/ knowledge with a high rate of accuracy over more extended spans of time with limited review

• Generalization – student generalizes skill or knowledge to novel contexts and as prior knowledge for learning new information

Page 23: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Acquisition Phase

• Acquisition – student’s ability to perform a newly learned skill/response to some criterion of accuracy– Strong use of reinforcers– Regular prompting & error correction– Modeling & Guided practice

• Model-Lead-Test/Model-Prompt-Check/I do-We do-You do

• Important to have critical background knowledge & prerequisite skills

A-B-C

Page 24: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Fluency• Following skill acquisition -- focus on

improving the RATE at which the learner performs the behavior

• What is an appropriate rate required for functional performance?– Reading, bus money, small talk, etc.

• Teaching Strategies– Frequent structured practice– Fading to intermittent reinforcementA-B-C

Page 25: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Maintenance

• Once learners can perform a skill fluently, it is important to maintain the skill over time– What

• Teaching Strategies– Make sure you are teaching functional/useful skills– Student access to natural reinforcers– Over-learning– Delayed reinforcement A-B-C

Page 26: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Generalization• Learners can use skill across settings other than the initial

instructional conditions– Train for generalization v. Train & Hope

• Teaching Strategies– Vary training across (Antecedent stimuli):

• Settings• People• Signals/Prompt types

– Teach the universe of examples– Intermittent reinforcement w/ link to natural reinforcers (Consequences)– Reinforce occurrences of generalization– Reinforce response across settingsA-B-C

Page 27: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

Reinforcement Continuum & Phases of Teaching

Stages of Learning/TeachingAcquisition Fluency Maintenance

Continuous Intermittent…………fading…Rates of Review & Reinforcement

Continuous – provide reinforcement/corrective feedback on every occurrence of behavior – reinforcement may be tangible paired w/ verbal praise

Intermittent – fade tangible, continue w/ intermittent verbal praiseCan usually anticipate that academic success or social benefits

will continue to maintain desired behavior.

A-B-C

Page 28: Theoretical Framework Science & Values

A-B-CA-B-C

Instruction & Support

Student Independence

AcquisitionFluency

MaintenanceGeneralization