14
Thinking about Engagement Geoff Pearman November 2008

Thinking about Engagement

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Thinking about Engagement. Geoff Pearman November 2008. Effective engagement – what does it look like Principles underlying effective engagement Becoming engaged - developing good practice. Overview. Group 1 Organisational engagement - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Thinking about Engagement

Thinking about Engagement

Geoff Pearman

November 2008

Page 2: Thinking about Engagement

Overview

• Effective engagement – what does it look like

• Principles underlying effective engagement

• Becoming engaged - developing good practice

Page 3: Thinking about Engagement

Exercise

Group 1 Organisational engagement

It is some time in the future – doesn’t matter when – but you as a stakeholder in tertiary education are experiencing what you would describe as a highly effective relationship with tertiary education providers

Discuss the relationship and list what the characterises of that relationship are

• What are people doing?• What are the attitudes

that underpin the relationship?

• What are some of the results of that relationship?

Group 2 Learner engagement

It is some time in the future – doesn’t matter when – but you as a learner are experiencing what you would describe as a highly effective relationship with your educational provider

Discuss the relationship and list what the characterises of that relationship are

• What are people doing?• What are the attitudes

that underpin the relationship?

• What are some of the results of that relationship?

Page 4: Thinking about Engagement

The Tertiary Education Reforms – Engagement

Intent

• A system that enables stakeholders to communicate their expectations and needs and to develop an appreciation of the constraints

• A tertiary education sector that delivers against government priorities and the national, regional and local needs of stakeholders

• Increased public confidence in the tertiary education sector

Stakeholders

• Those who have a stake in the outcomes of tertiary education

• Learners and their communities, businesses, industries, trade unions, interest groups, economic development agencies, professional associations, cultural groups etc

“This is a whole new funding system. It is a whole change in the way institutions think about what they offer, how they plan, how they budget and how they contribute overall.” Hon Pete Hodgson 2007

Page 5: Thinking about Engagement

Thinking about Engagement

Public EngagementFocus:TEC

Community EngagementFocus:TEO’s

Stakeholder EngagementFocus:Stakeholders

An Engaged Tertiary Education System

Values/behavioursRespectTrustReciprocityDialogueMutual benefits

Page 6: Thinking about Engagement

Thinking about Engagement

Community EngagementFocus: TEI

Learner EngagementFocus: Educator

Stakeholder EngagementFocus: Industry, community

An Engaged Tertiary Learning System

Values/behavioursRespectTrustReciprocityDialogueMutual benefits

Page 7: Thinking about Engagement

Engagement

Community Engagement - Definition

“Engagement is a sustained, embedded and reciprocal exchange between a tertiary institution and its communities that transforms the teaching, research and service mission of the institution and contributes to social and economic development.” Pearman 2005

Stakeholder Engagement - Foundations• Trust• Reciprocity• Dialogue• Shared ownership and responsibility

for issues, resources and outcomes

“If you can’t build in reciprocity you won’t have a sustainable relationship.” Business Leader 2008

TeachingResearchService

Social and Economic

Development

NeedsPriorities

GapsQuest Quest

for for RelevanceRelevance

Sustained

Reciprocal

Em

bedd

ed

Transform

s

Page 8: Thinking about Engagement

Engagement

“Engagement is characterised by an emphasis on mutual benefits, knowledge exchange and an expectation of partnerships that create reciprocity between participants” Holland 2008

Intensityof relationship

Mode of relationship

Low

High

Briefing PartnershipDisclosure Consultation Collaboration

ComplexFewer

SimpleMany

EngagementEngagement

Representation Dialogue

Page 9: Thinking about Engagement

Foundations for Engagement - Trust

Benefits of trust

• Once established it stabilises relationships and eases inter-organisational conflicts

• More effective than hierarchical power or control

• Efficient allocation of resources and significantly reduces transaction costs

• Sharing of intellectual capital

• Able to form collective strategies to better respond to need

• Provides a means to cope with risk and uncertainty

• Enhanced system stability

Inter-organisational trust is of outstanding importance in building and maintaining effective network relations.” Sydow 1998:56

“..We should refrain from direct management of trust…[rather we] should act in a trust-sensitive way when building and sustaining inter-organisational relations and networks.” Sydow 1998

Inter-organisational trust is the outcome of social practices.” Sydow 1998:54

Page 10: Thinking about Engagement

Foundations for Engagement - Trust

Building and sustaining trust

• Trust begins where knowledge ends – it always implies confidence in the face of risk

• Acceptance of vulnerability – it could go pear shaped, but…

• Doesn’t have to be global – it can be in relation to a specific area or activity

• Most likely to be mutual but doesn’t have to be

• Power can be hidden behind the façade of trust and the rhetoric of collaboration. Large organisations tend to be more trusting and smaller ones less confident of the trustworthiness of exchange partners

• Takes work to build, but easy to fracture and difficult to rebuild

• Begins with a policy of small steps

Page 11: Thinking about Engagement

Foundations for Engagement - Trust

Building trust through

• Identifying trustworthy individuals and organisations

• Sharing assumptions at the beginning

• Communicating frequently– developing mutual understanding

• Having trust enhancing communication

• Multiple of communication – variety of reasons and different content

• Recognising the open endedness of the relationship

• Balancing autonomy and dependence

• The building and sustaining of trust requires time and effort from people in boundary spanning roles

“Inter-organisational trust is the outcome of social practices.” Sydow 1998:54

Page 12: Thinking about Engagement

Foundations for Engagement - Reciprocity• Reciprocity is a two-way street

• Reciprocity occurs when action by one party promotes and engenders action by the other side

• In all ongoing, lasting and mutually beneficial and satisfying relationships we find reciprocity

• Underpinning reciprocity are the values of exchange, trust and mutuality

• Reciprocity is often described as a feeling. Note the intensity of feeling when we experience a lack of reciprocity.

“Engagement is transformative, it is not engagement unless there is learning resulting from the exchange and each is different as a result.” Ramaley 2008

Page 13: Thinking about Engagement

Towards best practice

Exercise

In small groups discuss

1. What would enhance engagement between your organisation and its stakeholders

2. What practices would build engagement between you as an educator and

(i) business, community etc

(ii) Learners

Page 14: Thinking about Engagement

References

• Australian Universities Community Engagement Alliance http://aucea.med.monash.edu.au:8080/traction

• Ako Aotearoa – Cooperative/ Work Integrated Learning Community of Practice http://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/communities

• Universities and Their Communities 2005 G Pearman http://www.uco.canterbury.ac.nz/staffpublications.shtml

• Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/ojs/index.php/ijcre

• Creating a Supportive Environment for Community-University Engagement: Conceptual Frameworks. Holland and Rammely HERDSA Conference 2008 http://www.herdsa.org.au/wp-content/uploads/conference/2008/media/Holland%20&%20Ramaley.pdf