21
Topic 8 Trespass to the person test Topic 8 Trespass to the person test

Topic 8 Trespass to the person test Topic 8 Trespass to the person test

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Topic 8 Trespass to the person test Topic 8 Trespass to the person test

Topic 8

Trespass to the person testTopic 8

Trespass to the person

test

Page 2: Topic 8 Trespass to the person test Topic 8 Trespass to the person test

Topic 8

Trespass to the person test

Question 1

What is the definition of assault?

Page 3: Topic 8 Trespass to the person test Topic 8 Trespass to the person test

Topic 8

Trespass to the person test

Answer 1

Assault was defined in the case of Collins v

Wilcock (1984) as ‘an act which causes another

person to apprehend the infliction of immediate,

unlawful force on his person’.

Page 4: Topic 8 Trespass to the person test Topic 8 Trespass to the person test

Topic 8

Trespass to the person test

Question 2

What happened in Smith v Chief Superintendent,

Woking Police Station (1983)?

Page 5: Topic 8 Trespass to the person test Topic 8 Trespass to the person test

Topic 8

Trespass to the person test

Answer 2

The victim was at home in her ground-floor flat dressed in her nightdress. She was terrified when she suddenly saw the defendant standing in her garden staring at her through the window. The court held that he was liable for assault, on the grounds that the victim feared immediate infliction of force, even though she was safely locked inside the building.

Page 6: Topic 8 Trespass to the person test Topic 8 Trespass to the person test

Topic 8

Trespass to the person test

Question 3

Can words amount to an assault?

Page 7: Topic 8 Trespass to the person test Topic 8 Trespass to the person test

Topic 8

Trespass to the person test

Answer 3

For many years, the courts have debated whether

words alone can amount to an assault. Recently,

the House of Lords decided that a silent phone

call can constitute an assault (R v Constanza; R v

Ireland and Burstow, 1997). It is thought that this

will now also be the position in civil law although

there has not, as yet, been a case to confirm this

principle.

Page 8: Topic 8 Trespass to the person test Topic 8 Trespass to the person test

Topic 8

Trespass to the person test

Question 4

To be guilty of assault, does the defendant have

to intend actually to inflict force on the claimant?

Page 9: Topic 8 Trespass to the person test Topic 8 Trespass to the person test

Topic 8

Trespass to the person test

Answer 4

No. In terms of the defendant’s state of mind, he

or she must have intended the claimant to

apprehend the infliction of immediate force. In

other words, he or she must have intended to

frighten the claimant (enough to amount to an

assault) but does not need to have intended

actually to inflict force on the claimant.

Page 10: Topic 8 Trespass to the person test Topic 8 Trespass to the person test

Topic 8

Trespass to the person test

Question 5

How is battery defined?

Page 11: Topic 8 Trespass to the person test Topic 8 Trespass to the person test

Topic 8

Trespass to the person test

Answer 5

Battery is the application of unlawful force on

another. It is sometimes referred to as ‘the least

touching of another in anger’.

Page 12: Topic 8 Trespass to the person test Topic 8 Trespass to the person test

Topic 8

Trespass to the person test

Question 6

Does there have to be violence or injury for a

battery to be committed?

Page 13: Topic 8 Trespass to the person test Topic 8 Trespass to the person test

Topic 8

Trespass to the person test

Answer 6

No. Any unlawful physical contact can amount to

a battery. There is no need to prove harm or pain

— a mere touch can be sufficient.

Page 14: Topic 8 Trespass to the person test Topic 8 Trespass to the person test

Topic 8

Trespass to the person test

Question 7

What happened in Bird v Jones (1845)?

Page 15: Topic 8 Trespass to the person test Topic 8 Trespass to the person test

Topic 8

Trespass to the person test

Answer 7

The defendant set up a seating area on Hammersmith Bridge and charged those who wanted to watch a boat race. The claimant attempted to walk through the area but refused to pay. The defendant would not let him pass and the claimant sued for false imprisonment. As the claimant could have crossed to the other side of the bridge, the defendant was not liable. The restraint on the claimant’s liberty was not total.

Page 16: Topic 8 Trespass to the person test Topic 8 Trespass to the person test

Topic 8

Trespass to the person test

Question 8

To have a claim for false imprisonment, does the

claimant have to be aware that he or she is being

detained?

Page 17: Topic 8 Trespass to the person test Topic 8 Trespass to the person test

Topic 8

Trespass to the person test

Answer 8

No. In Meering v Grahame-White Aviation Co.

(1920), the Court of Appeal said that the

defendants were liable despite the fact that the

claimant did not know that he was being

detained.

Page 18: Topic 8 Trespass to the person test Topic 8 Trespass to the person test

Topic 8

Trespass to the person test

Question 9

What defences are available to the tort of

trespass to the person?

Page 19: Topic 8 Trespass to the person test Topic 8 Trespass to the person test

Topic 8

Trespass to the person test

Answer 9

The following defences are available:

• consent

• self-defence

• lawful authority and detention

Page 20: Topic 8 Trespass to the person test Topic 8 Trespass to the person test

Topic 8

Trespass to the person test

Question 10

Name the legislation governing harassment.

Page 21: Topic 8 Trespass to the person test Topic 8 Trespass to the person test

Topic 8

Trespass to the person test

Answer 10

The Protection from Harassment Act 1997, as

amended by the Serious Organised Crime and

Police Act 2005.