37
TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March 19, 2019 112 Confederate Street 6:30 PM AGENDA CALL TO ORDER APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Regular Meeting: February 19, 2019 [Pages 2‐5] NEW BUSINESS ITEMS 1. Subdivision Request: 1822 N Dobys Bridge Road [Pages 6‐9] Request from CTR REIT of Rock Hill, LLC to subdivide York County Tax Map Number 020‐ 12‐01‐320, consisting of +/‐ 4.505 acres of land, into two parcels 2. Subdivision Request: 419 & 421 Banks Street [Pages 10‐14] Request from NC RE Investments LLC to subdivide Tax Map 020-05-04-010, consisting of ± 1.693 acres of land, into two parcels. 3. Rezoning Request: Rutledge MXU Project [Pages 15‐37] An ordinance amending the Mixed Use Concept Plan & Development Conditions for the Rutledge MXU Project, consisting of York County Tax Map Numbers 020‐21‐01‐330, 020‐ 21‐01‐331, and 020‐21‐01‐332 containing approximately 49.298 +/‐ acres located at the Southwest corner of the intersection of Springfield Parkway and U.S. HWY 21 Bypass. ADJOURN The following press was notified of the meeting by email or fax in accordance of the Freedom of Information Act: The Herald; CN2; WRHI; Fort Mill Times and WBTV. The agenda was also posted at the entrance to Town Hall the required length of time and on the Town website. The Town of Fort Mill is committed to assuring accessibility with reasonable accommodation, of Town services and facilities for all individuals, in compliance with federal law. Please contact the Town Manager’s Office at 803‐547‐ 2116 if you need assistance. 1

TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 

March 19, 2019 112 Confederate Street 

6:30 PM 

AGENDA 

CALL TO ORDER 

APPROVAL OF MINUTES 

1. Regular Meeting:  February 19, 2019 [Pages 2‐5] 

NEW BUSINESS ITEMS 

1. Subdivision Request:  1822 N Dobys Bridge Road [Pages 6‐9] Request from CTR REIT of Rock Hill, LLC to subdivide York County Tax Map Number 020‐

12‐01‐320, consisting of +/‐ 4.505 acres of land, into two parcels

2. Subdivision Request:  419 & 421 Banks Street [Pages 10‐14] Request from NC RE Investments LLC to subdivide Tax Map 020-05-04-010, consisting of ± 1.693 acres of land, into two parcels.

3. Rezoning Request:  Rutledge MXU Project  [Pages 15‐37]

An ordinance amending the Mixed Use Concept Plan & Development Conditions for the

Rutledge MXU Project, consisting of York County Tax Map Numbers 020‐21‐01‐330, 020‐

21‐01‐331, and 020‐21‐01‐332 containing approximately 49.298 +/‐ acres located at the

Southwest corner of the intersection of Springfield Parkway and U.S. HWY 21 Bypass.

ADJOURN 

The following press was notified of the meeting by email or fax in accordance of the Freedom of Information Act: The Herald; CN2; WRHI; Fort Mill Times and WBTV. The agenda was also posted at the entrance to Town Hall the required length of time and on the Town website. 

The Town of Fort Mill is committed to assuring accessibility with reasonable accommodation, of Town services and facilities for all individuals, in compliance with federal law. Please contact the Town Manager’s Office at 803‐547‐2116 if you need assistance. 

1

Page 2: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

MINUTES TOWN OF FORT MILL

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING February 19, 2019

112 Confederate Street 6:30 PM

Present:

Absent:

Guests:

James Traynor, Hynek Lettang, Ben Hudgins, Tom Petty, Zhengzheng Wiley, Matthew Lucarelli, Asst. Town Manager Chris Pettit, Nick Cauthen

Chris Wolfe

Mary Ellen and Lou Cila, Chris Schraf, Ryan Davis, Matt Hutto

Chairman Traynor called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm.

Commissioner Petty made a motion to approve the minutes from the January 15, 2019 meeting as submitted. Commissioner Hudgins seconded the motion. The minutes were approved by a vote of 5-0.

NEW BUSINESS ITEMS

Commissioner Wiley arrived prior to the discussion of New Business Item #1

1. Rezoning Request: 1462 & 1466 N. Dobys Bridge Road: Mr. Pettit provided a briefoverview of the request, the purpose of which was to review and provide arecommendation on an ordinance amending the zoning map for the Town of Fort Mill soas to change the zoning designation for York County Tax Map Numbers 020-11-01-111 and020-11-01-110 (portion) from R-15 Residential to TC Transitional Commercial. Staffrecommended in favor of denial.

Lou Cila, the property owner, stated that his intent was to use a portion of the existing building as an office for his insurance company and to lease the remaining portion to a professional office user. Discussions occurred relating to the prior uses of the property (church office), Mr. Cila’s concerns of using the property as residential, Mr. Cila’s intent to not change the structures on the property, and Mr. Cila’s observation of commercial properties on other portions of N. Dobys Bridge Road.

Chairman Traynor discussed the difficulty of the request given its inconsistency with the comprehensive plan, further explaining the differences between the property subject to the rezoning request, the commercial properties existing on N. Dobys Bridge Road, and the legal nonconforming gas station adjacent to the property.

Commissioner Lucarelli questioned what some of the other permitted uses were within the TC District, to which Mr. Pettit noted that buildings were limited to 7,500 square feet and

2

Page 3: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

the more intensive uses ranged from pharmacies, medical offices, banks, and some retail uses.

Mr. Cila questioned whether there was an alternative zoning designation that would allow his intended use for his property and not allow the more intensive uses permitted in the TC District, to which Chairman Traynor noted the intent of the TC District was to serve as a transition between residential and commercial areas and that the subject property was not located in a transitional area.

Commissioner Hudgins requested clarification on what the surrounding properties were zoned, to which Mr. Pettit responded with those designations. Discussions occurred related to the commercially zoned properties at the corner of N. Dobys Bridge Road and Williams Road, with which it was discussed that the properties were zoned commercial prior to the Fort Mill Parkway existing and that the Fort Mill Parkway shifted the Town’s plans for commercial south to its intersection with N. Dobys Bridge Road. Mr. Pettit noted that a rezoning was previously discussed to change the commercial designation of the Williams Road properties to a residential designation to bring them into conformance with the comprehensive plan.

Commissioner Lucarelli asked for clarification on staff’s recommendation as listed at the end of the staff report given that it stated the recommendation was for denial of the annexation, to which Mr. Pettit clarified that the wording was an error and that the recommendation was for denial of the rezoning.

Mr. Cila questioned whether the Planning Commission’s feelings toward the request would be different if it was only for the existing one-acre parcel as opposed to the proposed two-acre parcel, to which Mr. Pettit explained that the zoning ordinance would require a two-acre minimum for a rezoning request to a new district.

Further discussions occurred related to the adjacent gas station, its nonconforming status, and other nonconformities that were due to uses existing prior to zoning.

Commissioner Hudgins spoke to the importance of staff’s recommendation and the work that is consistently put in to the Town’s comprehensive plan, of which the rezoning request does not conform to.

There being no further questions, Chairman Traynor called for a motion. Commissioner Hudgins made a motion to recommend in favor of denial of the request. Commissioner Lucarelli seconded the motion. The motion as approved by a vote of 6-0.

2. Rezoning Request: Fort Mill Church of God: Mr. Chris Pettit provided a brief overview of the request, the purpose of which was to review and provide a recommendation on an ordinance amending the zoning map for the Town of Fort Mill so as to change the zoning designation for York County Tax Map Numbers 020-06-06-010, 020-06-06-009, 020-06-06-008, 020-06-06-007, 020-06-06-006, 020-06-06-005, 020-06-06-002, and 020-06-06-012

3

Page 4: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

from R-15 Residential to LC Local Commercial. Staff recommended in favor of approval.

Chairman Traynor questioned whether the adjoining property owners were notified, to which Mr. Pettit stated that he received no communication from adjoining property owners and that the Town would post the property prior to Town Council’s public hearing. Commissioner Hudgins provided his concerns of introducing commercial into a residential area. The questioned was asked as to whether the subject properties were located within the Historic Preservation Overlay District and what effect that would have, to which Mr. Pettit noted that the properties were not in the historic district and therefore would not affect the properties subject to the request. Discussions occurred related to the surrounding properties and their zoning designations, with specific discussion also occurring related to the properties within the same block that were not included in the rezoning request. Chairman Traynor noted that the proximity to existing commercial did make the request different than the previous agenda item, however a concern did exist relating to protecting the established residential area. Commissioner Lettang questioned the applicant’s intent, to which Mr. Pettit noted that the church no longer had a use for the structure at the corner of Confederate and Forrest Streets and that their primary intent was to rezone the property so they could lease the structure to a professional office user. The question was asked as to the size of the single parcel containing the structure proposed for professional office, to which Mr. Pettit noted that it was not large enough to rezone by itself and therefore the church was required to assemble multiple properties to achieve the two-acre minimum threshold. Discussions occurred related to the existing residential character surrounding the subject properties, with Commissioner Lucarelli noting that there is a buffer to the residential but that the subject properties also had a residential feel to them. There being no further questions, Chairman Traynor called for a motion. Commissioner Lettang made a motion to recommend in favor of denial of the request. Commissioner Petty seconded the motion. The motion was approved by a vote of 6-0.

INFORMATION / DISCUSSION

1. Preliminary Appearance Review – 1544 Sam Smith Road: Mr. Pettit gave a brief description of the preliminary appearance review. The project included a one-story steel building located at 1544 Sam Smith Road. The applicants stated this property would be used for a gymnastics facility. They felt it would have a positive effect on the community with the amount of families in the area that are currently having to travel outside of Fort Mill to find a viable facility.

4

Page 5: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

The applicant presented a PowerPoint showing the building and general layout. The applicant stated the walls of the building would be 16 feet with a maximum roof height of 26 feet. The applicant stated the dimensions of the building are 150’ x 275’ with a metal façade. The Commission responded that a pre-engineered building is acceptable, but the façade must be of a quality material on all four sides. Mr. Traynor asked what the property is zoned? Staff responded that the property is zoned Limited Industrial and this would be a permitted use. Mr. Petty recommended the applicant drive by A-lock-it storage building for an example of an approved pre-engineered structure with added façade materials. Mr. Traynor along with other Commission members added that a quality façade material must be used along with variations in architecture and placement of windows to eliminate long expanses of blank walls. Mr. Lucarelli recommended to plan for the need of a Traffic Impact Analysis and that sidewalks would also have to be installed. The Commission concluded by saying this is an attractive use for the Town but that extensive improvement to the façade of the building will be required before an approval is granted. It was also recommended to the applicant to bring sample materials to the next meeting and to provide adequate buffers to protect the adjoining residential properties.

There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:22.

Respectfully submitted,

Chris Pettit, AICP Assistant Town Manager March 14, 2019

5

Page 6: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

Meeting Information Meeting Type Planning Commission Meeting Date March 19th, 2019

Request Summary

Request Type Action (Old Bus.) X Action (New Bus.) Info/Discussion Public Hearing Executive Session Other

Case Summary

Case Type Annexation Rezoning Text Amendment X Subdivision Plat Appearance Review Other

Property Information Applicant CTR REIT of Rock Hill LLC Property Owner CTR REIT of Rock Hill LLC Property Location Corner of N. Doby’s Bridge Road and Haire Road Tax Map Numbers 020-12-01-320Acreage ± 4.505 acres Current Zoning HC (Highway Commercial) w/COD-N (Corridor Overlay District) Existing Use Vacant/Wooded

Title

Request from CTR REIT of Rock Hill, LLC to subdivide Tax Map 020-12-01-320, consisting of ± 4.505 acres of land, into two parcels.

Background Information

Site Characteristics The subject property, consisting of ± 4.505 acres, is located at 1822 N. Doby’s Bridge Road at the intersection with Haire Road. The property contains approximately 239 linear feet of road frontage on N. Doby’s Bridge Road and is bisected by Haire Road. The property is currently undeveloped and was recently annexed into the Town of Fort Mill.

Neighboring Uses Direction Zoning Existing Use North RD-II Single Family Residential & Vacant South HC & RD-II Single Family Residential East RD-II Single Family Residential & Vacant West RUD Single Family Residential

Zoning Summary The site is currently zoned HC, Highway Commercial

6

Page 7: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

Maximum Building Height: 35’ Minimum lot area: 10,000 square feet Minimum lot width: 75’ at building line Minimum front yard setback: 35’ Minimum side yard setback: 10’ Minimum rear yard setback: 35’

Applicant Proposal The applicant is proposing to subdivide two parcels of property from the

existing ± 4.505-acre tract. The property is zoned HC, Highway Commercial. Subsequent the approval of this subdivision, it is the applicant’s intent to develop that portion of the property on the east side of Haire Road with a child daycare.

Staff Recommendation

Staff recommends in favor of approval of this proposed subdivision.

Alternatives

1. Grant approval with conditions. 2. Grant approval. 3. Deny subdivision approval.

Staff Recommendation Recommendation Staff recommends in favor of APPROVAL for the request.

Name & Title Alex Moore, Senior Planner Department Planning Department

Date of Request March 12th, 2019 Legislative History

Planning Commission Scheduled – 3/19/19

Attachments

• Aerial Map • Proposed Subdivision Plat

7

Page 8: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

Aerial Map

8

Page 9: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

9

Page 10: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

Meeting Information Meeting Type Planning Commission Meeting Date March 19th, 2019

Request Summary

Request Type Action (Old Bus.) X Action (New Bus.) Info/Discussion Public Hearing Executive Session Other

Case Summary

Case Type Annexation Rezoning Text Amendment X Subdivision Plat Appearance Review Other

Property Information

Applicant NC RE Investments LLC Property Owner NC RE Investments LLC Property Location Banks Street Tax Map Numbers 020-05-04-010 Acreage ± 1.693 acres Current Zoning R-15 Existing Use Multifamily

Title

Request from NC RE Investments LLC to subdivide Tax Map 020-05-04-010, consisting of ± 1.693 acres of land, into two parcels.

Background Information

Site Characteristics The subject property, consisting of ± 1.693 acres, is located on Banks Street.

This property contains two multifamily apartment buildings, 419 and 421 Banks Street, respectively. The proposed division of the property would occur at the centerline of the existing driveway which serves these buildings.

Neighboring Uses Direction Zoning Existing Use

North R-15 Single Family Residential & Vacant South R-15 Institutional East R-15 Single Family Residential West R-15 Single Family Residential

Zoning Summary The site is currently zoned R-15, One-family residential

10

Page 11: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

Maximum Building Height: 35’ Minimum lot area: 15,000 square feet Minimum lot width: 100’ at building line Minimum front yard setback: 35’ Minimum side yard setback: 10’ Minimum rear yard setback: 35’

Applicant Proposal The applicant is proposing to subdivide two parcels of property from the

existing ± 1.693-acre tract. The property is zoned R-15, One-family residential. Staff Recommendation

Staff recommends in favor of approval of this proposed subdivision.

Alternatives

1. Grant approval with conditions. 2. Grant approval. 3. Deny subdivision approval.

Staff Recommendation Recommendation Staff recommends in favor of APPROVAL for the request.

Name & Title Alex Moore, Senior Planner Department Planning Department

Date of Request March 12th, 2019 Legislative History

Planning Commission Scheduled – 3/19/19

Attachments

• Aerial Map • Zoning Map • Proposed Subdivision Plat

11

Page 12: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

Aerial Map

12

Page 13: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

Zoning Map

13

Page 14: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

14

Page 15: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

Meeting Information Meeting Type Planning Commission Meeting Date March 19, 2019

Request Summary

Request Type Action (Old Bus.) X Action (New Bus.) Info/Discussion Public Hearing Executive Session Other

Case Summary

Case Type Annexation X Rezoning Text Amendment Subdivision Plat Appearance Review X Other

Property Information

Applicant William Mosley Property Owner Rutledge Land & Realty LLC, C4 Holdings LLC Property Location Corner of Springfield Parkway and U.S. HWY 21 Bypass Tax Map Number 020-21-01-330, 020-21-01-331, and 020-21-01-332 Acreage 49.268 +/- acres Current Zoning MXU Proposed Zoning MXU Existing Use Vacant/Wooded

Title

An ordinance amending the Mixed Use Concept Plan & Development Conditions for the Rutledge MXU Project, consisting of York County Tax Map Numbers 020-21-01-330, 020-21-01-331, and 020-21-01-332 containing approximately 49.298 +/- acres located at the Southwest corner of the intersection of Springfield Parkway and U.S. HWY 21 Bypass.

Background Information Site Characteristics The property is currently located at the southwest quadrant of the

intersection of Springfield Parkway and U.S. HWY 21 Bypass, consisting of approximately 49.268 acres of currently vacant/wooded land. The property includes approximately 1,720 feet of frontage on Springfield Parkway and approximately 1,950 feet of frontage along U.S. Hwy 21 Bypass. The western and southern edges of the project contain wetlands and floodplain, which acts as a natural buffer.

15

Page 16: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

Neighboring Uses Direction Zoning Existing Use

North BD-III, AGC

Captain Steve’s Restaurant, Vacant (County)

South PD Church/Vacant (County) East AGC, BD-

III Single-Family Residences (County), Vacant (County)

West PD Vacant (County), CATO Development (County)

Zoning Summary The Mixed Use Concept Plan & Development Conditions for the Rutledge

MXU Project was adopted for the above referenced parcels as required by Article II, Section 19(5)(D)(1)(a), of the Zoning Ordinance for the Town of Fort Mill in February 2017. The MXU district is intended to encourage flexibility in the development of land in order to promote its most appropriate use; to improve the design, character and quality of new development; to facilitate the provision of infrastructure; and to preserve the natural and scenic features of open areas. This district is intended for the appropriate integration of a wide range of residential and non-residential uses. The district is intended for use in connection with developments where the town has determined that the quality of a proposed new development there under will be enhanced by flexibility in the planning process. Any use proposed by an applicant and considered by the town council as compatible with the surrounding area may be permitted within the project area upon approval by the town council. In the attached MXU Concept Plan and Development Conditions, the applicant is proposing to develop up to 200 single-family (attached or detached) units on the site. Under the proposed development conditions, the proposed setbacks and minimum lot specifications would be as defined in Article II, Section 19-4{A) of the Zoning Ordinance.

Concept Plan & Development Conditions

As approved in 2017, the Development Conditions for the Rutledge MXU Project allowed for the development of:

• 245 dwelling units with a gross residential density of 5 units per acre;

• A minimum of 50,000 square feet and a maximum of 175,000 square feet of building space designated for commercial use;

The proposed amendment to the Rutledge MXU Project Development Conditions & Concept Plan would:

16

Page 17: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

• Amend the maximum number of allowed dwelling units from 245 (any type) to 200 (single family attached or detached) with a residential density of 4.1 units per acre;

• Amend the overall minimum square footage from 50,000 to 20,000 for commercial and the overall maximum square footage from 175,000 to 50,000;

• Amend the language related to the vehicular access and road improvements to include a TIA prior to construction activities;

• Amend the language related to landscaping to include a tree survey showing tress 32” in caliber or greater;

• Amend the language related to streets to ensure sidewalks are installed along the project’s frontages of U.S. HWY 21 Bypass and Springfield Parkway;

• Amend the language to acknowledge that portions of the development are subject to the Town’s TCP Transportation Corridor Preservation Overlay District;

• Amend the language related to floodplain areas subject to the Town’s ordinances related to floodplains and development within floodplain areas

Comprehensive Plan The property is located within an area that has been designated as “Medium Density Residential” on the Town of Fort Mill’s Future Land Use Map, last updated in May 2016. The comprehensive plan generally defined “medium density” as three to five dwelling units per acre. The currently approved Rutledge MXU Project density of 5 units per acre is consistent with the recommendations of the comprehensive plan. With the proposed amendment to the Rutledge MXU Project Concept Plan & Development Conditions, the future density would remain consistent with the recommendation of the comprehensive plan. The proposed commercial component is also consistent with the recommendations of the Node 3a on the future land use map.

17

Page 18: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

Traffic Impact Properties zoned MXU would require a traffic impact analysis (TIA) prior to

the development of the property. The review of the proposed development and TIA would be coordinated with SCDOT and may require the completion off-site transportation improvements to mitigate the development’s impact to the transportation network. Any off-site transportation improvements deemed necessary by the Town and SCDOT would be the responsibility of the developer.

Fire Impact The property is located approximately 4.0 miles (7 minutes) ordinary

driving distance from the town’s main fire station on Tom Hall Street. Utility Impact The subject property is currently located within the York County water and

sewer service district. The applicant would be required to work with York County to determine the improvements necessary to serve the property.

School Impact The applicant’s request would lower the maximum allowable residential units, which would therefore decrease the potential impact to the school district’s enrollment figures.

18

Page 19: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

Discussion As mentioned above, the town’s Comprehensive Plan recommends “Medium Density Residential” as the preferred land use in this location, which is defined as 3 to 5 dwelling units per acre. The proposed amendment to the Mixed Use Concept Plan & Development Conditions is consistent with the future land use plan. Additionally, the addition of commercial is consistent with the recommends for Node 3a. Staff recommends in favor of approval of the ordinance amending the Rutledge MXU Project.

Alternatives

1. Recommend approval of the ordinance amending the Mixed Use Concept Plan & Development Conditions for the Rutledge MXU Project.

2. Recommend approval of the ordinance amending the Mixed Use Concept Plan & Development Conditions for the Rutledge MXU Project with Changes.

3. Recommend denial of the ordinance amending the Mixed Use Concept Plan & Development Conditions for the Rutledge MXU Project.

Staff Recommendation

Recommendation Staff recommends in favor of APPROVAL of the ordinance amending the Mixed Use Concept Plan & Development Conditions for the Rutledge MXU Project.

Name & Title Penelope Karagounis, Planning Director Department Planning Department

Date of Request March 19th, 2019

Legislative History Planning Commission Scheduled: 03/19/2019

First Reading TBD Public Hearing TBD

Second Reading TBD Effective Date Upon adoption

Attachments

• Application • Aerial Map • Zoning Map • Draft Ordinance Amending the MXU Development Conditions and Concept Plan

19

Page 20: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

20

Page 21: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

21

Page 22: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

Aerial Map

22

Page 23: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

Zoning Map

23

Page 24: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA TOWN COUNCIL FOR THE TOWN OF FORT MILL

ORDINANCE NO. 2019-___ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MIXED USE CONCEPT PLAN & DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS FOR THE RUTLEDGE MXU PROJECT, CONSISTING OF PARCELS CURRENTLY OR FORMERLY KNOWN AS YORK COUNTY TAX MAP NUMBERS 020-21-01-330, 020-21-01-331 AND 020-21-01-332 CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 49.268 +/- ACRES LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF SPRINGFIELD PARKWAY AND U.S. HWY 21 BYPASS

WHEREAS, by ordinance No. 2014-15 of the Fort Mill Town Council, a Mixed Use Concept Plan & Development Conditions for the Rutledge MXU Project was adopted; and

WHEREAS, by ordinance No. 2017-06 of the Fort Mill Town Council, an amended Mixed Use Concept Plan & Development Conditions for the Rutledge MXU Project was adopted to include the parcel currently or formerly known as York County Tax Map Number 020-21-01-330 and make other amendments to the Concept Plan & Development Conditions; and

WHEREAS, the Property Owner and Town Council now wish to further amend the Mixed Use Concept Plan & Development Conditions for the Rutledge MXU Project to make the changes as shown within the Development Conditions attached as “Exhibit A,” and the Concept Plan as shown within the attached “Exhibit B,” both of which have been reviewed by the Fort Mill Planning Commission and the Fort Mill Town Council and found to be consistent with the Town’s Comprehensive Plan;

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority granted by the Constitution of the State of South Carolina and the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina, BE IT ENACTED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL FOR THE TOWN OF FORT MILL:

SECTION I. Pursuant to Article II, Section 19(5)(D)(3), of the Zoning Ordinance for the Town of Fort Mill, the Development Conditions for the Rutledge MXU Project are hereby amended as shown within the attached “Exhibit A.” Where any conflicts exist between the Development Conditions and the Subdivision Ordinance or Zoning Ordinance for the Town of Fort Mill, the provisions specified within the Development Conditions shall apply. A copy of these development conditions shall be maintained on file in the office of the Town Clerk and the Zoning Administrator.

SECTION II. Pursuant to Article II, Section 19(5)(D)(4), of the Zoning Ordinance for the Town of Fort Mill, the Concept Plan for the Rutledge MXU Project is hereby amended as shown within the attached “Exhibit B.” A copy of this Concept Plan shall be maintained on file in the office of the Town Clerk and the Zoning Administrator.

SECTION III. The provisions of this ordinance shall apply to the parcels currently or formerly known as 020-21-01-330, 020-21-01-331, and 020-21-01-332, containing approximately 49.268 acres at the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Springfield Parkway and U.S. Highway 21 Bypass.

24

Page 25: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

SECTION IV. If any section, subsection, or clause of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, the validity of the remaining sections, subsections, and clauses shall not be affected thereby.

SECTION V. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed.

SECTION VI. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective from and after the date of adoption.

SIGNED AND SEALED this _____ day of ___________________, 2019, having been duly

adopted by the Town Council for the Town of Fort Mill on the _____ day of ___________________, 2019. First Reading: TOWN OF FORT MILL Public Hearing: Second Reading: ______________________________ Guynn H. Savage, Mayor LEGAL REVIEW ATTEST ______________________________ ______________________________ Barron B. Mack, Jr, Town Attorney Virginia Burgess, Town Clerk

25

Page 26: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

EXHIBIT A

Development Standards & Conditions Rutledge MXU Project

26

Page 27: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS & CONDITIONS Rutledge MXU Project 

  Development Standards  RUTLEDGE ‐ MXU ‐ PROJECT CONDITIONS  1. Purpose of district  

The  purpose  of  the  mixed  use  development  (MXU)  district  is  to  encourage  flexibility  in  the development  of  land  in  order  to  promote  its  most  appropriate  use;  to  improve  the  design, character and quality of new development; to facilitate the provision of  infrastructure; and to preserve  the  natural  and  scenic  features  of  open  areas.  This  district  is  intended  for  the appropriate  integration of a wide  range of  residential and non‐residential uses. The district  is intended  for  use  in  connection with  developments where  the  town has  determined  that  the quality of a proposed new development there under will be enhanced by flexibility in the planning process. 

 2. Platting requirements 

 Platting requirements will be in accordance with ARTICLE II PLAT REQUIREMENTS, of Chapter 32‐SUBDIVISIONS, of the Town of Fort Mill Municipal Ordinance. Where possible, plats will comply with Article II, Section 19.3(C) of the Zoning Ordinance. 

 3. Bonding requirements 

 Bonding  requirements  will  be  in  accordance  with  Section  32.104‐SURETY  BOND,  Article  IV‐REQUIRED  IMPROVEMENTS,  of  Chapter  32‐Subdivisions,  of  the  Town  of  Fort  Mill  Municipal Ordinance. 

 Rutledge MXU Conditional Notes  1. General Provisions 

 a) Each proposal for the development under MXU district is anticipated to be unique. Except as 

provided by this section, an MXU district shall be subject to all of the applicable standards, procedures and regulations in other sections of the zoning ordinance.  

b) The development depicted on the Concept Development Plan (RZ‐1.0) is intended to reflect the arrangement of proposed uses on the site, but the final configuration, placement and the size of individual site elements may be altered or modified within the limits of the Ordinance and  the  standards  established  on  the  Development  Standards  Sheet  during  design development  and  construction  phases.  Street  alignment  and  lot  layout  width  and  depth dimensions may be modified  to  accommodate  final  building  layout  and  lot  locations.  The Petitioner reserves the right to modify the total number of lots identified within individual 

27

Page 28: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

parcels or phases, reallocate units from a parcel or phase to another, or reconfigure lots and street layouts, provided the density for the entire mixed use development does not exceed the permitted density set forth in these Development Standards.  

c) These  standards,  as  established  by  the  Rutledge  Technical  Data  Development  Standards Sheet, as set out below and as depicted on the Mixed Use Development Site Plan shall be followed in connection with development taking place on the site. Standards established by these Development Standards Sheet and Rutledge Mixed Use Development Site Plan shall supersede the Fort Mill Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance in effect at the date of approval. 

 2. Permitted uses 

 a) Residential: 

 i) Subject to the information listed below, a maximum combination of 245200150 dwelling 

units may be constructed on the site.  Dwelling units may consist of single family attached units, single family detached units, or a combination of both attached and detached units. or detached dwelling unitslots may be constructed on the site.  

ii) Residential use shall be allowed throughout all areas of the development having minimum dimensional standards as specified in section 15, along with any incidental or accessory uses in connection therewith, which are permitted by right or under prescribed conditions in the Mixed Use Zoning District or as part of the Rutledge Mixed Use Development.  

iii) Common  Open  Space: May  include  conservation  lands,  natural  areas,  formal  greens, plazas, courtyards, and buffers.  

iv) Amenities: May or may not include, but shall not be limited to amenity buildings, pool and pool facilities, athletic fields, parks, trails, playground equipment, picnic shelters and other accessory uses commonly associated with amenity facilities.  

b) Commercial/Mixed Use:  i) Subject  to  the  information  listed  below,  a  minimum  of  5020,000  square  feet  to  a 

maximum  of  175,00050,000  square  feet  of  building  space  shall  be  designated  for commercial use.  

ii) Commercial  use  shall  be  allowed  throughout  all  areas  of  the  development  having minimum dimensional standards as specified in section 15, along with any incidental or accessory uses in connection therewith, which are permitted by right or under prescribed conditions  in  the  Mixed  Use  Zoning  District  or  as  part  of  the  Rutledge  Mixed  Use Development. 

 3. Density 

 

28

Page 29: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

The maximum  residential  density  for  the  property will  shall  not  exceed  245a  combination  of 150200  single  family  attached  or  detached  units,lotsunits  which  is  based  on  anequates  to approximately  4.1  residential  units  per  gross  acre  (  approximately  49‐acre  site) multiplied  by 534.0 residential units per gross acre.    Individual project phases may exceed 54.10 residential units per acre so long as the total residential unit count does not exceed a combination of 150200 245 unitssingle family attached or detached lotsunits for the property.   

4. Streets  Minimum  dimensions  and  design  standards  for  each  street  type  shall  follow  a  consistent standard. The standards for each street shall follow one of the following:  a) Public Residential and Commercial Streets: In accordance with the Town standards outlined 

in the Fort Mill Subdivision Ordinance.  

b) All Residential Streets: Shall be designed to provide a stop condition no more than 2,000 feet apart.  This  will  be  accomplished  by  "T"  intersections  where  practical.  Where  this  is  not practical due  to site constraints, posted stop signs at  intersection(s) within  the 2,000‐foot street length will be installed.  

c) Cul‐de‐sacs: Shall conform to standards in the Fort Mill Subdivision Ordinance, except that alternative  cul‐de‐sacs  and  loop  streets  shall  be  permitted  to  have  landscaped  islands, provided  that  the  dimensions  of  these  islands will  accommodate  the  turn‐around  of  fire trucks without backing up. Subdrains will be provided behind the island curb if irrigation is installed within the cul‐de‐sac island. Cul‐de‐sac lengths may vary as shown on the Rutledge MXU Site Plan. The Rutledge Mixed Use Development will provide landscaped island where feasible. Landscaped islands are subject to approval of the Town of Fort Mill Fire department.  

d) Sidewalks: Will be installed on at least one side of all streets.  Sidewalks shall be installed and stubbed out to the neighboring property lines along the project’s frontages of US‐21 Highway Bypass and Springfield Parkway.     At  the Developer's option, additional  sidewalks may be installed.  

e) Block Lengths: Block lengths shall be a maximum of 2,000 feet.  5. Vehicular Access and Road Improvements 

 a) Vehicular Access: Access shall be provided to US‐21 Highway Bypass and Springfield Parkway, 

in  the  general  location  as  shown  on  the  Rutledge  Concept  Development  Plan.  Minor adjustments to the locations of street and driveway entrances may occur, as required to meet state and local agency standards, or as a result of further site investigation and coordinate with final subdivision and site plan design.  

b) Improvements to Existing Roads: A traffic impact analysis (TIA) shall be completed prior to the commencement of any  land clearing or construction activities. The developer shall be responsible for installing any necessary public roadway improvements identified within the 

29

Page 30: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

TIA as required by SCDOT and the Town of Fort Mill, to the extent such improvements are found necessary to accommodate future traffic from the Rutledge Mixed Use Project.  

b)  traffic impact analysis (TIA) has been completed, reviewed by SCDOT and the Town below outlines the required improvements and phasing:   

1. Prior to the issuances of the certificate of occupancy (CO) for the first residential building the developer shall provide the following improvements: 

a. Full movement driveway connection to Springfield Parkway (Access #1), without turn lanes 

b. Full movement driveway connection to US Hwy 21 (Access #4), with 100‐foot SB right‐turn lane, 150‐foot NB left‐turn lane and exclusive EB right‐turn lane. 

c. Restriping  of  the  existing  200‐foot  WB  left  turn  lane  on  Springfield Parkway at US Hwy 21 traffic signal to approximately 450 feet of storage (from current 200 feet). This will be performed by the developer to the extent that it is defined as a restriping effort, contained within the existing pavement, within the existing right‐of‐way, and without modification to the existing right in‐right‐out (RIRO) median at the Harris Teeter shopping center. 

d. The CO for the clubhouse will be provided without ties to the completion of roadway improvements. 

2. Prior to the issuances of the certificate of occupancy (CO) for the first shopping center building the developer shall provide the following improvements: 

a. RIRO drive connection to Springfield Parkway (Access #2), with a median to be constructed in Springfield Parkway, without turn lanes. 

The addition of turn lanes at the full movement driveway connection at Springfield Parkway (Access #1); 100‐foot EB right‐turn lane, 150‐foot WB left‐turn lane, and exclusive NB right‐turn lane. 

 b. RIRO and leftover drive connection to US Hwy 21 (Access #3), without turn 

lanes. c. Restriping  of  the  existing  200‐foot  WB  left  turn  lane  on  Springfield 

Parkway at US Hwy 21 traffic signal to approximately 450 feet of storage (from current 200 feet). This will be performed by the developer to the extent that it is defined as a restriping effort, contained within the existing pavement, within the existing right‐of‐way, and without modification to the  existing  RIRO median  at  the  Harris  Teeter  shopping  center.  If  not already completed in a previous phase. 

3. Prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy (CO) for a shopping center building causing the aggregate square footage to exceed 205,000 sf the developer shall provide the following improvements: 

a. The addition of turn lanes at the full movement driveway connection at Springfield Parkway (Access #1); 100‐foot EB right‐turn lane, 150‐foot WB left‐turn lane, and exclusive NB right‐turn lane. 

30

Page 31: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

b. RIRO drive connection to Springfield Parkway (Access #2), with a median to be constructed in Springfield Parkway, without turn lanes. If not already completed in a previous phase. 

c. RIRO drive connection to US Hwy 21 (Access #3), without turn lanes. If not already completed in a previous phase. 

d. Restriping  of  the  existing  200‐foot  WB  left  turn  lane  on  Springfield Parkway at US Hwy 21 traffic signal to approximately 450 feet of storage (from current 200 feet). This will be performed by the developer to the extent that it is defined as a restriping effort, contained within the existing pavement, within the existing right‐of‐way, and without modification to the  existing  RIRO median  at  the  Harris  Teeter  shopping  center.  If  not already completed in a previous phase. 

 c) Coordination:  The  developer  shall  coordinate  where  feasible  with  neighboring  property 

owners regarding stub road locations and future roadway connections.  6. Landscaping 

 Landscaping  will  be  provided  in  accordance  with  Article  II,  Section  19.4{J)  of  the  Zoning Ordinance. Existing vegetation will be retained and maintained to the extent feasible.  As a part of the preliminary plat process and prior to any approvals for land disturbance, a tree survey shall be prepared and submitted to Fort Mill staff showing the locations and species of all trees 32” in caliper or greater. The protection and/or mitigation of these trees shall be in accordance with the requirements of Article IV, Section 3 of the Fort Mill Zoning Ordinance.

  7. Open Space 

 Common open space will be provided, to be platted and recorded separately from other uses. Open space will be owned and maintained by a Homeowner's Association or Property Owner's Association. A minimum of 20% of the total site will be maintained as preserved open space or built  open  space.  The  following  may  be  counted  towards  required  dedicated  open  space: conservation  lands,  natural  areas,  flood  plain  areas,  wetlands,  formal  greens,  plazas  and courtyards, trails, buffers held in common ownership, and parks and recreation areas, including ball  fields,  golf  courses  (excluding  vertical  structures:  clubhouse  and  maintenance  facilities), tennis and basketball courts, playgrounds, and other areas used for active or passive recreation. Water quality ponds, rain gardens, and other types of public (non‐fenced) stormwater facilities may also be counted towards the open space requirements. 

 8. Parking and Loading 

 Parking,  loading,  and  other  requirements  for  each  permitted  use  and  platted  lot  will  be  in accordance with the requirements of Article  I, Section 7, Subsection  I  for  the Fort Mill Zoning Ordinance subject to the petitioner's ability to include parking spaces located within units with garages as eligible spaces meeting said requirements. 

 

31

Page 32: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

9. Access to Lots  Access (curb cuts) to each platted lot must comply with standards set forth in the Fort Mill Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. 

 10. Signage 

 A proposed project signage package shall be provided for approval to the town. All signs shall meet the requirements of Article II, Section 19.4(1), Subsections 1, and 2 of the Zoning Ordinance. Approval to not be unreasonably withheld. 

 11. Building Heights 

 Proposed building heights shall be in accordance with Article II, Section 19.4{A). Building height shall be measured in accordance with Article II, Section 19.4{D) of the Zoning Ordinance. 

 12. Improvements 

 The developer will be  responsible  for  installation of  required streets, utilities,  common areas, amenity improvements, open space, storm drainage, and buffer yards, which pertain specifically to the project. 

 13. Changes 

 a) Petitioner/Developer understands that upon approval of the Mixed Use Development by the 

Town Council, any changes that are proposed which are considered to be of a minor nature such as adjustments or relocation of streets, lots, and open space; or adjustments to interior parcel boundaries, parcel sizes, or  lot sizes and quantities; or  location, size and number of buildings, may be approved by the Fort Mill staff through an administrative review process. Other minor changes may be made to the list of permitted uses, unit mixture, reallocation of unit types, relocation of uses, buffer yards, landscaping and open space standards throughout the project, shall be subject to review and approval through an administrative process by the Fort Mill staff.  

b) Significant changes to the Mixed Use Development Site Plan which include changes increasing overall project dwelling unit count, land use summary, location of primary access points to the property and adding acreage are all considered to be major site plan changes and are subject  to  approval  by  the  Town  Council  in  accordance with  Chapter  32  of  the  Fort Mill Municipal Ordinance. 

 14. Construction Schedule and Phasing 

 This  development  may  be  constructed  in  phases.  Proposed  phasing  will  be  determined  and approved during the Preliminary Plat process. 

 15. Development Standards 

32

Page 33: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

 Design Standards‐Storm drainage and utilities (including sanitary sewer, gas, electric, telephone and cable television) may be located within landscape corridors.  a) Maximum Residential Density: 200 dwelling units  (approximately 4.15.0 dwelling units per 

gross acre)  

b) Impervious Surface Ratio: 90% for residential, 100% for remaining uses  

c) Residential  Development  ‐  Development  Standards  per  Article  II,  Section  19‐4{A)  of  the Zoning Ordinance.  

d) Commercial/Mixed Use Development ‐ Development Standards per Article II, Section 19‐4(A) of the Zoning Ordinance.  

e) Buffer  Yards:  Perimeter  Buffer  yards  between  the  Rutledge Mixed Use Development  and adjacent  properties  will  be  in  accordance  with  Article  II,  Section  19.4(K.)  of  the  Zoning Ordinance. The buffer shall be a natural, undisturbed wooded area where possible, and shall count  towards  the  provision  of  open  space  for  the  development where  the  buffer  is  not platted  and  made  part  of  an  individual,  privately  owned  lot.  Where  an  existing  natural, undisturbed wooded area does not exist, a planted buffer shall be required in conformance with the buffer standards of Article II, Section 19.4(K) of the Zoning Ordinance.  

f) Petitioner reserves the right to construct a minimum 6‐foot high opaque fence, wall, berm, or combination thereof in order to satisfy buffer and/or screening requirements. In the event that the petitioner or their assignee decides to install a fence, wall, or berm, they may reduce buffer area dimensions by 25%. Buffer Yards will be designed in a manner to allow openings of an appropriate width in order to allow pedestrian connectivity. Utilities and right of way are allowed to be located in buffer areas where needed.  

g) Notwithstanding the ordinary setbacks for the underlying Mixed Use District, all buildings and structures shall be set back a minimum of 40 feet from the Springfield Parkway right‐of‐way, and a minimum of 25 feet from U.S. Highway 21 Bypass right‐of‐way, so as to accommodate future  road  widening.    Portions  of  the  development  are  subject  to  the  Town’s  TCP Transportation  Corridor  Preservation  Overlay  District.    In  instances  where  the  additional setbacks outlined in this paragraph conflict with the requirements of the TCP Overlay District, the requirements of the TCP Overlay District shall govern.  

 16. Model Homes  

Model homes may be constructed within residential areas at the developer's discretion. Mobile temporary sales offices shall be allowed on site at the developer's discretion. The developer will be permitted a minimum of 4 model homes with offices or mobile temporary sales offices and mobile temporary construction offices. 

 17. Lot Transfer and Recording 

33

Page 34: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

 Lots may be transferred or recorded by means of posting appropriate surety bonds as referenced in Sec. 32.104. 

 18. Water and Sewer  

The Developer understands  that water and sewer will be provided by York County  for all  lots within the Mixed Use Development. The Developer shall construct or cause to be constructed, at Developer's cost, all necessary water and sewer service infrastructure to, from, and within the Property.  The  developer  will  comply  with  all  DHEC  and  York  County  water  and  sewer specifications. The Property shall be subject to all current and future water connection/capacity fees  imposed  by  the  County.  A  water  and  sewer  "willingness  and  capability  letter" must  be received from the County prior to obtaining a grading permit for any portion of the development utilizing the York County water and sewer. Should the Town of Fort Mill and York County elect to enter  into  a  service  agreement  whereby  the  Town  provides  retail  service  to  the Mixed  Use Development,  then  the  developer  shall  comply  with  the  specifications,  fees,  and  permitting requirements of the Town of Fort Mill. 

 19. Applicable Ordinances  

This development will be subject to the standards and requirements for the Fort Mill Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance in effect at the date of approval by the Town of Fort Mill or as superseded  by  the  provisions  of  the  Rutledge  Concept  Development  Plan  and  Development Standards, as approved by the Town of Fort Mill. 

 20. Ten Year Vested Right  

Due  to  the  size  of  the  proposed  development  and  the  level  of  Petitioner's  investment,  the Petitioner requests a ten (10) year vested right for construction of this project.All vested rights for the development shall be in accordance with the South Carolina Vested Rights Act. 

 21. Binding Effect of the Rezoning Documents  

If this Rezoning Petition is approved, all conditions applicable to development of the site imposed under  the  Rezoning  Site  Plan  and Development  Standards  Sheet will,  unless  amended  in  the manner provided under the Ordinance, be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Petitioner and subsequent owners of the site and their respective successors in interest and assigns. Upon approval of the Rezoning Site Plan and Development Standards Sheet by the Town of Fort Mill the Petitioner agrees to record above listed documents at the York County register of deeds office within 120 days. 

 22. Restrictive Covenants  

Restrictive Covenants will be created and recorded with the office of the county clerk of court prior  to  the  approval  of  a  plat  or  issuance  of  a  building  permit  for  a  vertical  building  on  the 

34

Page 35: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

property. Covenants shall be in accordance with Article II, Section 19.3{D) of the Fort Mill Zoning Ordinance. 

 23. Provisions Related to Floodplain Areas 

 Portions  of  the  Property  are  currently  designated  as  floodplain  areas.  Should  the  applicant proceed with development plans within any floodplain area, a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) or Letter  of  Map  Amendment  (LOMA)  shall  be  required  from  FEMA  before  any  development activities may commence.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, the project shall also be subject to the Town’s ordinances related to floodplains and development within floodplain areas.  In the event of conflict, the more restrictive requirement shall apply.    

24. Development Impact Fees  

The Property shall be subject to all current and future development impact fees imposed by the Town, provided such fees are applied consistently and in the same manner to all similarly‐situated property within  the  Town  limits.  The  Property  shall  also  be  subject  to  all  current  and  future development impact fees imposed by the Fort Mill School District, provided such fees are applied consistently and in the same manner to all similarly‐situated property within the Town limits. For the purpose of this Agreement, the term “development  impact fees” shall  include, but not be limited to, the meaning ascribed to such term in the South Carolina Development Impact Fee Act, Sections 6‐1‐910, et seq, of the SC Code of Laws. 

   

35

Page 36: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

EXHIBIT B

Concept Plan Rutledge MXU Project

36

Page 37: TOWN OF FORT MILL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March …

37