Upload
stone-fischer
View
35
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Transport Coefficients of I nteracting Hadrons. Anton Wiranata & Madappa Prakash (Advisor) Department of Physics and Astronomy Ohio University, Athens, OH. Topics. Motivation Shear & bulk viscosities in the Chapman-Enskog approximation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Transport Coefficients of Transport Coefficients of Interacting Hadrons Interacting Hadrons
Anton WiranataAnton Wiranata&&
Madappa Prakash (Advisor)Madappa Prakash (Advisor)
Department of Physics and AstronomyOhio University, Athens, OH
Motivation Shear & bulk viscosities in the
Chapman-Enskog approximation Non relativistic limit for shear and bulk
viscosities Bulk viscosity and the speed of sound Inelastic collisions & transport coefficients Shear & bulk viscosities of mixtures
Transport coefficients (bulk & shear viscosities) are important inputs to viscous hydrodynamic simulations of relativistic heavy-ion collisions.
Collective motion with viscosity influences (reduces) the magnitude of elliptic flow relative to ideal (non-viscous) hydrodynamic motion.
“For small deviations from equilibrium, the distribution function can be expressed
in terms of hydrodynamic variables ( f(x,p) μ(x), u(x), T(x) ) and their gradients.
Transport coefficients (e.g., bulk & shear viscosities) are then calculable
from relativistic kinetic theory.”
Deviation function
Equilibrium distribution function
μ(x) : Chemical potentialu(x) : Flow velocityT(x) : Temperature
the solution (deviation function) has the general structurethe solution (deviation function) has the general structure
The collision integral
Bulk viscosity
Heat conductivity Shear Viscosity
Reduced enthalpyRelativistic Omega Integrals
Relativity parameter
Ratio of specific heats
Transport cross sectionThermal weightRelative momentum dependent
Relative momentum : g = mc sinh ψTotal momentum : P = 2mc cosh ψ
Thermal variable
Contains collision cross sections
Shear viscosity
Non-relativistic case : z=m/kT >> 1
Non-relativistic omega integral
g : Dimensionless relative velocity
Note the g7 – dependence in the kernel, which favors high relative velocity particles in the heat bath (energy density & pressure carry a g4 – dependence) .
Note also the importance of the relative velocity and angle dependences of the cross section.
The quantities ci,j contain omega integrals
Hard sphere cross section –
Hard-sphere cross section –
It is desirable to reproduce these results in alternative approaches, such as variational & Green-Kubo calculations (in progress with collaborators from Minneapolis & Duke).
Bulk viscosity
Non relativistic case : z = m/kT >> 1
Non-relativistic omega integral
g : Dimensionless relative velocity
The quantities ai,j contain omega integrals
Hard sphere cross section –
Hard sphere cross section –
Illustration Continued : Interacting Pions Illustration Continued : Interacting Pions (Experimental Cross Sections)(Experimental Cross Sections)
Parametrization from Bertsch et al. , PR D37 (1988) 1202.
1. The convergence of successive approximations to shear viscosity is significantly better than that for the bulk viscosity.
2. However, bulk viscosity is about 10-3 x shear viscosity, so its influence on the collision dynamics would be minimal, except possibly near the transition temperature.
Chapman-Enskog 1Chapman-Enskog 1stst approximation approximation
Adiabatic speed of sound
Features thermodynamic variables
The omega integral contains transport cross-section
Utilizing
Nearly massless particles or very high temperatures (z << 1) :Nearly massless particles or very high temperatures (z << 1) :
Massive particles such that z >> 1 :Massive particles such that z >> 1 :
Lesson : For a given T, intermediate mass particles contribute significantly to ηv
2nd order bulk viscosity
Feature thermodynamic variables
3rd order bulk viscosity
Terms that feature speed of sound dependences
Inelastic collisions can induce transitions to excited stated or result in new species
of particles. For the general formalism, see e.g., Kapusta(2008). In the
nonrelativistic case (applicable to heavy resonances) of
i + j k + l (Wang et al., 1964),
Energy of particle i Integration variable Energy difference
Inelastic terms
In the limit of the small Delta epsilon, inelastic collisions do not affect shear viscosity
Internal excitation and creation of new species of particles contribute to bulk viscosity
cint & cv are the internal heat capacity & heat capacity at fixed V per molecules
Inelastic term
In non-relativistic limit (z = m/kT >>1) , inelastic part of the cross section Contributes the most for bulk viscosity.
Thermodynamics termsThe same kind of particle collision
Different kind of particle collision
Relative momentumweight Thermal weight
Transport cross section
Relativistic Omega Integrals
Bulk viscosity of two type of spherical particles
Result for N – species at pth order of approximation
Solubility conditions (assures 4-momentum conservation in collisions)
Coefficients to be determined Omega integral
Involves ratios of specific heats
Coefficients to be determined
Calculation of ηs & ηs /s for a mixture of interacting hadrons with masses up to 2 GeV.
Development of an approach to calculate the needed differentialcross-sections for hadron-hadron interactions including resonances up to 2 GeV( In collaboration with Duke Univeristy).
Comparison of the Chapman-Enskog results with those of the Green-Kubo approach( In collaboration with Duke Univeristy).
Inclusion of decay processes (In collaboration with Minessota University
All the above for bulk viscosity ηv and ηv /s