Click here to load reader
View
33
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Trends in Educational Achievement: An International, National and Local Comparison of Student Performance. Where We Stand Internationally. Where We Stand Internationally. Where we Stand Internationally. Racial Achievement Gap. Racial Achievement Gap. Racial Achievement Gap. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Slide 1
Trends in Educational Achievement:
An International, National and Local Comparison of Student Performance
Where We Stand Internationally
Where We Stand Internationally
Where we Stand Internationally
Racial Achievement Gap
Racial Achievement Gap
Racial Achievement Gap
Racial Achievement Gap
Income Achievement Gap
Intersection of Race and Poverty
Intersection of Race and Poverty
What makes a difference?
Multi-County Comparisons of Reading AYP, 2007-2008% Achieving Proficiency, by race
Multi-County Comparisons of Reading AYP, 2007-2008% Achieving Proficiency, by social factor
Multi-County Comparison of 2008 SAT Scores*
Average total (2400 max)Average Reading + Math (1600 max)*Effective fall 2007, the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) was expanded to include a writing section. Each of the three sections can now receive a maximum score of 800 points, making possible a total score of 2400 on all three sections.
Multi-County Comparison % students taking SAT, 2008
CMS EOG Math Result 2006-09% Level III/IV, by raceCMS EOG Math Result 2006-08% Level III/IV, by social factor
2007-08 Multi-County Comparison,Graduation Rates by Gender
2007-08 Multi-County Comparison,Graduation Rates by Social Factor2007-08 Multi-County Comparison,Graduation Rates by Race
CMS Math Scores - 2009
CMS Math Gap Trends
CMS Reading Scores - 2009
CMS Reading Gap Trends
CMS Science Scores - 2009
CMS Science Gap Trends
1. CMS Department of Instructional Accountabilityhttp://pmd.cms.k12.nc.us/School%20Performance/Schools/Profile.aspx
2. North Carolina Department of Public Instructionhttp://ayp.ncpublicschools.org/2008/app/leaimp/Detail.cgi
3. ies National Center for Education Statisticshttp://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d07/tables/dt07_100.asp
4. McKinsey & Company Social Sector Officehttp://mckinsey.com/clientservice/socialsector/achievementgap.asp
5. Multi-County Comparison of Students Taking SAThttp://www.ncpublicschools.org/docs/newsroom/news/2008-09/0826/sat-performance.pdf
6. Education Resource Strategies: Rethinking Resources for Student Success, January 27, 2009
REFERENCES