26
Trends in Leadership thought.

Trends in Leadership thought

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Trends in Leadership thought. Quiz (1). How would you define leadership? Where would you expect to find the earliest recorded descriptions of leaders? Who wrote about the lives of great engineers? What assumption lies behind trait theories of leadership. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Trends in Leadership thought

Trends in Leadership thought.

Page 2: Trends in Leadership thought

Quiz (1)

• How would you define leadership?• Where would you expect to find the

earliest recorded descriptions of leaders?• Who wrote about the lives of great

engineers? • What assumption lies behind trait theories

of leadership.• What do we remember as Stogdill’s

contribution to leadership.

Page 3: Trends in Leadership thought

Quiz (2)

• What assumption lies behind style theories of leadership?

• Suggest two contrasting leadership styles found in experimental studies.

• What is a contingency theory?

• What leadership style is associated with ‘New Leadership’ theories of the 1980s?

• What is distributed leadership?

Page 4: Trends in Leadership thought

Quiz (3)

• What leadership concept was central to Max Weber’s social theorizing?

• How did the theory re-emerge in later leadership studies?

• What are usually listed as the historical periods of leadership thought?

• What led to changes in leadership thought?

Page 5: Trends in Leadership thought

KEY STAGES IN LEADERSHIP THOUGHT:

• Heroic leadership; • Trait based theories; • Transactional theories (style & situational approaches)

• The “New leadership” movement (transformation leadership; vision, management of meaning)

Page 6: Trends in Leadership thought

Definitions: It depends what you mean by leadership ...

• Influence processes,• Mobilizing resources

to arouse, engage & satisfy the motives of followers;

• Making sense [of what people are doing] …articulating purpose & values.

Page 7: Trends in Leadership thought

HEROIC LEADERSHIP:

• Ancient ideas of leadership can be found in all cultures.

• Heroic leaders were historic & mythic figures later analysed by Max Weber (Charisma)

• Other18th/19th century studies examined contemporary & historic figures.

• Influential accounts by Thomas Carlisle, Samuel Smiles, Friedrich Nietzsche.

Page 8: Trends in Leadership thought

Max Weber:

• Weber explained the formation & disruption of social institutions;

• His model involved the influence of charismatic leaders.

• These were believed to possess special powers & gifts.

Page 9: Trends in Leadership thought

THOMAS CARLYSLE:

• History made up of accounts of heroic leaders.

• He argued that all heroes were flawed

• … but should be excused their flaws.

• “No man is a hero to his valet”.

Page 10: Trends in Leadership thought

SAMUEL SMILES:

• Biographer of the hero-engineers of the Industrial Revolution;

• He captured “Victorian values” such as self-help & public duty;

• He tended towards uncritical hero-worship.

Page 11: Trends in Leadership thought

FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE:

• Complex German Existential Philosopher;

• Believed in the “great man” (Uberman) who was above normal laws of society.

Page 12: Trends in Leadership thought

LIMITATIONS OF THE HEROIC VIEW:

• Became regarded as “romantic & pre-modern.”

• Leading figures (Carlisle, Nietzsche) were espoused by totalitarian regimes.

• Considered unsuited to modern organizations.

• Concealed “the dark side.”

Page 13: Trends in Leadership thought

TRAIT THEORIES:

• Seek the essence of leaders (‘born to lead’)

• Francis Galton pioneered an empirical approach anticipating subsequent psychometric methods.

• Studies produced many different traits, failed to establish a ‘universal’ theory.

• Thurstone’s five factors proposal ignored for many years (but partially rehabilitated)

Page 14: Trends in Leadership thought

DECLINE IN TRAIT THEORIES:

• The multiplicity of traits identified became a problem;

• Stogdill’s Handbook called for a new approach (1960s)

• This helped in the rise of Style theories, & other Transactional theories.

• [Co-editor Bass later associated with transformational leadership]

Page 15: Trends in Leadership thought

STOGDILL & STYLE THEORIES: • Stogdill’s group at

Ohio State pioneered style (what leaders do) over traits (what leaders are)

• Labelled main styles as consideration [towards others], & initiation of structure (“People & Task” styles)

Page 16: Trends in Leadership thought

DECLINE OF STYLE THEORIES:

• The approach failed to demonstrate a “universally effective leadership style.”

• It overlooked ‘situational’ or contextual effects (which made effectiveness ‘contingent’ or ‘sometimes influenced by’ non-style factors)

Page 17: Trends in Leadership thought

STYLE & CONTINGENCY AS TRANSACTIONAL THEORIES:

• Style & contingency can be seen as transactional theories;

• A transactional leader is the term applied to leaders studied in terms of their behaviors, specifically in their transactions with others.

Page 18: Trends in Leadership thought

TRANSACTIONAL & TRANSFORMATIONAL THEORIES:

• Transactional theories were replaced trait theories (1960s – 1980s).

• They failed to satisfy needs in organizations for a change-centred theory.

• This was provided by a series of studies by Bernard Bass & colleagues (1970s - )

Page 19: Trends in Leadership thought

BOTH/& … NOT EITHER/OR:

• Bass & Avolio’s ‘Full Range’ leadership model indicated that transformational leadership was an ‘add-on’ not a ‘replacement for’ transactional behaviors.

• The factors were important in developing a New Leadership era (1980s)

Page 20: Trends in Leadership thought

Factors in the full-range model -

Transactional factors:

Transformational factors:

Contingent rewards (carrots & sticks)

Management by exception (active & passive versions)

Idealized influence (Charisma?)

Inspirational motivation;

Intellectual stimulation;

Individualized consideration.

Page 21: Trends in Leadership thought

NEW LEADERSHIP:• Term was coined by Alan

Bryman;

• Became widely-cited;

• Focused on transformational change;

• Regarded leaders as

providers of vision; • Theory is an interpretative

one.

Page 22: Trends in Leadership thought

WHAT’S BEYOND NEW LEADERSHIP?

• New Leadership left a lot of issues unanswered.

• These include ‘post-charismatic’ ideas such as 5th-level leadership; distributed leadership; & leaderless groups. (self-directed work teams)

Page 23: Trends in Leadership thought

Post- charismatic ideas (1990s-)

• Fifth-level leaders (Jim Collins) were found to be “modest but of fierce resolve.”

• Distributed leadership suggests that a team “owns” different parts of the leadership process.

• Leaderless groups have been proposed as the “natural” condition of informal social activities. (Self-directed work teams)

Page 24: Trends in Leadership thought

Distributed leadership Model -

The Slone Distributed Leadership Model (DLM) is based on:

Sensemaking; Relating; Visioning; Inventing. (collaborative designing to realize a shared vision)

DLM ‘seeks to help each leader discover a personal Change Signature (an individual approach grounded in personal beliefs)

Page 25: Trends in Leadership thought

How many of the introductory questions are easier to answer

now?

Page 26: Trends in Leadership thought

To go more deeply

• Rickards & Clark (2005), Dilemmas of Leadership, Routledge, http://www.routledge.com/textbooks/0415355850/

• Bryman, A., Leadership, • http://www.amazon.com /SAGE-Handbook-

Organization-Studies/dp/0761949968• http://sloanleadership.mit.edu/pdf/Leadershipina

nAgeofUncertainty-researchbrief.pdf