18
TRIGGERING IN THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Thomas Schörner-Sadenius UHH Teilchenphysik II 4. November 2005

TRIGGERING IN THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Thomas Schörner-Sadenius UHH Teilchenphysik II 4. November 2005

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Teilchen 2, 4. November 2005TSS: Triggering in ATLAS3 ATLAS TRIGGER MENU COVERAGE Inclusive and di-lepton B physics H   SUSY, leptoquarks Resonances, compositeness Gauge boson pair production for study of anomalous couplings and behaviour of production at high energies single and pair top production direct Higgs production with H  ZZ*/WW*; associated SM Higgs production with WH, ZH, ttH MSSM Higgs decays Production of new gauge bosons with decays to leptons. SUSY and leptoquark searches specialised, more exclusive menus 2EM15I at L1, 2  20i at L2. Also MSSM. High p T jets with/without E Tmiss. High p T jets. Triggering mostly with inclusive / di-leptons.

Citation preview

Page 1: TRIGGERING IN THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Thomas Schörner-Sadenius UHH Teilchenphysik II 4. November 2005

TRIGGERING IN THE ATLAS

EXPERIMENT

Thomas Schörner-SadeniusUHH

Teilchenphysik II4. November 2005

Page 2: TRIGGERING IN THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Thomas Schörner-Sadenius UHH Teilchenphysik II 4. November 2005

Teilchen 2, 4. November 2005 TSS: Triggering in ATLAS 2

PHYSICS AT THE LHC IIComparison of SM and ‘new physics’ processes

Small cross-sections for

‘new physics’processes

Understandingof SM processes

important

• Backgrounds for ‘discovery physics’: Wbb, ttbb, W/Z pairs…• Calibration, energy scale: Ze+e-,+-, J/e+e-,+-, Wjj…

At high luminosity~23 events overlaid

… for 2•1033cm-2s-1 usually only one event

… and small branching ratios (e.g. H).SM processes dominate.

Necessity of efficient trigger!

Page 3: TRIGGERING IN THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Thomas Schörner-Sadenius UHH Teilchenphysik II 4. November 2005

Teilchen 2, 4. November 2005 TSS: Triggering in ATLAS 3

ATLAS TRIGGER MENU COVERAGE

Inclusive anddi-lepton

B physics

H

SUSY,leptoquarks

Resonances,compositeness

• Gauge boson pair production for study of anomalous couplings and behaviour of production at high energies • single and pair top production• direct Higgs production with HZZ*/WW*; associated SM Higgs production with WH, ZH, ttH• MSSM Higgs decays• Production of new gauge bosons with decays to leptons. • SUSY and leptoquark searches

• specialised, more exclusive menus

• 2EM15I at L1, 220i at L2. Also MSSM.

• High pT jets with/without ETmiss.

• High pT jets.

Triggering mostly with inclusive / di-leptons.

Page 4: TRIGGERING IN THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Thomas Schörner-Sadenius UHH Teilchenphysik II 4. November 2005

Teilchen 2, 4. November 2005 TSS: Triggering in ATLAS 4

THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT - Length ~40 m- Diameter ~25 m- Weight ~7000 t- 108 channels (event ~2MB)

- ‘Inner (tracking) Detector’- calorimeters (energies)- muon detectors

- Barrel: solenoid around ID and toroid fields in muon system- Endcaps: toroid fields

Page 5: TRIGGERING IN THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Thomas Schörner-Sadenius UHH Teilchenphysik II 4. November 2005

Teilchen 2, 4. November 2005 TSS: Triggering in ATLAS 5

THE ‘INNER DETECTOR’

Pixel Detector:

- 3 barrel layers - 2•4 end-discs - 140•106 channels- R=12m,z,R=~70m- || <2.5

Silicon Tracker:

- 4 barrel layers, || <1.4 - 2•9 end-discs, 1.4 < < 2.5- Area 60 m2

- 6.2•106 channels- R=16m, z,R=580m

Transition Radiation Tracker

- 0.42•106 channels- =170m per straw- || <2.5

Page 6: TRIGGERING IN THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Thomas Schörner-Sadenius UHH Teilchenphysik II 4. November 2005

Teilchen 2, 4. November 2005 TSS: Triggering in ATLAS 6

THE CALORIMETERS

Hadronic Tile:- 463000 scintillating tiles- 10000 PMTs- Granularity 0.1•0.1 - : <1.0, (0.8-1.7)- L=11.4 m, Rout=4.2 m

Hadronic LArEndcaps:

- steel absorbers- 4400 channels- 0.1•0.1 / 0.2•0.2- 1-5

EM LAr Accordeon:

- lead absorbers- 174000 channels- 0.025•0.025- : <2.5, <3.2

Forward LAr:- 30000 rods of 1mm- cell size 2-5cm2 (4 rods)- : <3.1, <4.9- 1 copper, 2 tungsten

LAr Pre-SamplerAgainst effects of

energy losses in front of calorimeters

Page 7: TRIGGERING IN THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Thomas Schörner-Sadenius UHH Teilchenphysik II 4. November 2005

Teilchen 2, 4. November 2005 TSS: Triggering in ATLAS 7

THE MUON SYSTEM

Monitored Drift Tubes

- 3 cylinders at R=7, 7.5, 10m- 3 layers at z=7, 10, 14 m- 372000 tubes, 70-630 cm- space=80m, t=300ps (24-bit FADCs)

Cathode Strip Chambers

- 67000 wires- only for ||>2 in first layer- space=60m, t=7ns

Thin Gap Chambers

- 440000 channels- ~MWPCs

Resistive Plate Chambers- 354000 channels- space=1cm- trigger signals in 1ns

Page 8: TRIGGERING IN THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Thomas Schörner-Sadenius UHH Teilchenphysik II 4. November 2005

Teilchen 2, 4. November 2005 TSS: Triggering in ATLAS 8

THE ATLAS TRIGGER: OVERVIEWMulti-layer structure for rate reduction: 1 GHz 100 Hz.

} EF- Full event- Best calibration- Offline algorithms- Latency ~seconds

} L1

- Hardware-based (FPGAs and ASICs)- Coarse granularity from calo/muon- 2s latency (pipelines)

} L2

- ‘Regions-of-Interest’- ‘Fast rejection’- Spec. algorithms- Latency ~10ms

Page 9: TRIGGERING IN THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Thomas Schörner-Sadenius UHH Teilchenphysik II 4. November 2005

Teilchen 2, 4. November 2005 TSS: Triggering in ATLAS 9

THE LEVEL1-TRIGGERSelection based on high-pT objects from calo and muon.

MultiplicitiesRegions-

of-InterestEvent decision

for L1

Interface tofront-end

Muoncandidatesabove pT

thresholds

Interface to highertrigger levels/DAQ:objects with pT,,

Candidates forelectrons/photons,taus/hadrons,jetsabove pT thres-holds.

Energy sumsabove thresholds

Page 10: TRIGGERING IN THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Thomas Schörner-Sadenius UHH Teilchenphysik II 4. November 2005

Teilchen 2, 4. November 2005 TSS: Triggering in ATLAS 10

THE CALORIMETER TRIGGER II

Example: The /hadron trigger Example: The jet/energy trigger

• 2·2 jet EM+HA cluster (RoI) in 2·2 or 3·3 or 4·4 region (gives ET).

• 8 (4) (forward) jet ET thresholds.

• Total/missing ET from jets (sum of 0.2·0.2 jet elements to ·=0.4·0.2, conversion to Ex,Ey, then summation).

• Maximum of EM+HA ET in 2·2 ‘RoI’, isolation criteria (alternative core definitions?).

• Multiplicities for 8(8) e/ (/ hadron) ET thresholds.

Builds candidate objects (RoIs): electrons/photons, taus/hadrons, jets.Ideas about core definitions, isolation criteria not really finalised.

Page 11: TRIGGERING IN THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Thomas Schörner-Sadenius UHH Teilchenphysik II 4. November 2005

Teilchen 2, 4. November 2005 TSS: Triggering in ATLAS 11

THE MUON TRIGGER

• ‘Roads’ can be defined for 6 different pT thresholds (for which multiplicity counts are delivered to the CTP).• BCID=1.5 ns.

Trigger chambers: • 3 RPC stations for ||<1.05• 3 TGC stations for 1.05<||<2.4. • 2 , layers per station (TGC 2/3)

pT information from hit coincidences in successive detector layers.

Procedure:• Put predefined ‘roads’ through all stations (width in ~ pT). • If hit coincidences in 2(3) stations muon candidate for pT thres- hold corresponding to ‘road’.

ATLAS quadrant in rz view

trigger chambersprecision chambers

Page 12: TRIGGERING IN THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Thomas Schörner-Sadenius UHH Teilchenphysik II 4. November 2005

Teilchen 2, 4. November 2005 TSS: Triggering in ATLAS 12

THE L1 DECISIONDerived in the ‘Central Trigger Processor’ (CTP).

Multiplicitiesof objects above

pT thresholds

‘Conditions’:multiplicity

requirements

‘Items’: logicalcombinationsof ‘conditions’

L1 result as‘OR’ of all ‘items’

Inputs to HLT: L1 result and objects with pT,,.

CTP

calorimeter, muon

Page 13: TRIGGERING IN THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Thomas Schörner-Sadenius UHH Teilchenphysik II 4. November 2005

Teilchen 2, 4. November 2005 TSS: Triggering in ATLAS 13

L1 SIMULATION: OVERVIEWMost developments originally for stand-alone applications.

Generation of MonteCarlo events for analysis purposes Rate/efficiency estimates Inputs for HLT tests Tests of L1 trigger hardware (~done for some compo- nents; just starting ‘slices’, configuration problem!)

Page 14: TRIGGERING IN THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Thomas Schörner-Sadenius UHH Teilchenphysik II 4. November 2005

Teilchen 2, 4. November 2005 TSS: Triggering in ATLAS 14

THE HIGH-LEVEL TRIGGER (HLT)Good example for solid software process.

Page 15: TRIGGERING IN THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Thomas Schörner-Sadenius UHH Teilchenphysik II 4. November 2005

Teilchen 2, 4. November 2005 TSS: Triggering in ATLAS 15

HLT: DESIGN OVERVIEW

EventFilter (EF)

ClassificationSelection~102 Hz

Hardware Implementation

LEVEL 2 (LVL2)~1 kHz

Level1 (L1)

~102 kHz

Read-OutSubsystemModules

High-Level Trigger: Design

HIGH-LEVEL TRIGGER (HLT)

Offline

Simplified subsystem view

Event- Filter

Page 16: TRIGGERING IN THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Thomas Schörner-Sadenius UHH Teilchenphysik II 4. November 2005

Teilchen 2, 4. November 2005 TSS: Triggering in ATLAS 16

HLT: SELECTION SOFTWARE

HLTSSW

Steering Monitoring Service

1..*

MetaData Service

1..*ROBDataCollector

DataManager HLTAlgorithms

Processing Task

EventDataModel

LVL2PU Application

<<import>>

Offline EventDataModel

Offline Reconstruction

Algorithms

<<import>>

StoreGateAthena/Gaudi

<<import>><<import>>

InterfaceDependency

Package

EventFilter

Level2

PESA Core Software

PESA Algorithms

Offline Architecture & Core Software

Offline Reconstruction

Running in Level2 Processing Units (L2PU)+EF.

Set-up by HLT configuration

Page 17: TRIGGERING IN THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Thomas Schörner-Sadenius UHH Teilchenphysik II 4. November 2005

Teilchen 2, 4. November 2005 TSS: Triggering in ATLAS 17

HLT DECISION (LEVEL2 AND EF)Overview of step-wise procedure with ‘dummy’ example Ze+e-

After every step: test + possibly rejection.

‘Physics Signature’: Ze+e- withpT>30 GeV

‘IntermediateSignature’

‘IntermediateSignature’

L1 result: 2 EM clusters

with pT>20 GeV

‘IntermediateSignature’

decision part algorithmic part

Page 18: TRIGGERING IN THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Thomas Schörner-Sadenius UHH Teilchenphysik II 4. November 2005

Teilchen 2, 4. November 2005 TSS: Triggering in ATLAS 18

AN ATLAS EVENT

H ZZ* e+e-+-

(mH = 130 GeV)

at high luminosity (1034 cm-2s-1)

The ‘hard’ Higgs event is overlaid with ~23‘minimum-bias’ and background events.