Upload
raajasoundar
View
92
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Ultra Low Liquor Ratio Myth and Facts. Worth for reading about Air-flow Dyeing.
Citation preview
FeaturesLogin
Clip this Page | Discuss this Page | Email this Page | Print this Page
TechnoFront
Ultra-low liquor ratio: Myths & facts
Ever since the arrival of THEN-AIRFLOW® technology and its extremely low liquor ratio of 1:3.5
for cotton fabrics, the number of dyeing machines for which their manufacturers claim “LLR” (low
liquor ratio) or “ULLR” (ultra-low liquor ratio) has mushroomed.
Suddenly, even basic conventional hydraulic machines have
turned LLR or even ULLR – at least in their promotional
literature. However, as with most things in life, if something
sounds too good to be true, it usually is.
This article discusses points to keep in mind to avoid being
rumbled by fantastic claims, and highlights the paramount
practical importance of water consumption per kg of fabric
processed for dye house economics.
Definition of “liquor ratio”
Liquor ratio describes the weight of goods processed vs the weight of the dye solution, whereby
the former is usually expressed in kilograms (kg) and the latter in litres (l). The practical
assumption is that one litre of dye solution weighs one kg.
Thus, for a load of 1,000 kg of fabric, a total liquor requirement of 3,500 l will result in a liquor
ratio of 1:3.5. This happens to be the typical liquor ratio of an AIRFLOW dyeing machine for
cotton. For synthetics, liquor ratios as low as 1:1.5 (for very fine PES fabrics) have been
achieved.
How to calculate your actual liquor ratio
Example 1:
Load of 500 kg of cotton fabric with a 270% pick-up in THEN-AIRFLOW® SYNERGY 500 machine
Table 1: Liquor ratio calculation for fully-loaded THEN-AIRFLOW® SYNERGY 500
machine
Corporate Update - A.T.E. + Trumac + Trutzschler = Excellence
Newsline Features Events & Exhibitions
Talking Point
Machinery & Accessories Corporate Updates Directory
Page 1 of 5Ultra-low liquor ratio: Myths & facts | TechnoFront | Features | The ITJ
7/10/2010http://www.indiantextilejournal.com/articles/FAdetails.asp?id=1454
This example illustrates the minimum amount of liquor in circulation in the AIRFLOW machines. However, the low liquor ratio
can be sustained even when underloading an AIRFLOW machine, as illustrated in the next Table.
Example 2:
Load of 250 kg of cotton fabric with a 270% pick-up in THEN-AIRFLOW® SYNERGY 500 machine
Table 2: Liquor ratio calculation for THEN-AIRFLOW® SYNERGY 500 machine with 50% load
In this example, the liquor required to compensate for the fabric pick-up drops by 50% -- commensurate with the 50%
decrease in load. The liquor required for circulation in pipes and used for chemicals additions can be reduced by 50 l, as
chemicals consumption is reduced in line with the lower load, too. It illustrates quite dramatically why dyers with AIRFLOW
machines remain highly competitive even when faced with loads that utilise even just half of the installed machine capacity.
How is it possible to run such low liquor ratios, even when the machine is underloaded by 50%? The secret lies in the unique
and patented THEN-AIRFLOW® concept.
The THEN-AIRFLOW® design principle
The key element in AIRFLOW technology is a stream of air, which represents the perfect transport medium. The use of air
instead of dye liquor to transport piece goods in jet dyeing machines is a patented, pioneering achievement from THEN. As
compared to jet nozzles, covered with dye liquor, pressure is negligible, which means that the sensitive surface of the fabric
is ideally protected. At the same time, the use of the air flow principle results in far superior laying of the material rope,
which prevents the formation of creases.
Figure 1: Patented THEN-AIRFLOW® machine design. Liquor circulation is shown in
air flow is shown in BLUE.
Item Unit Value Loading of machine kg 500 Liquor required @ 270% pick-up
litres 1,350
Liquor circulating in pipes and used for chemicals additions
litres 400
Total litres 1,750 Practical liquor ratio 1:3.5
Item Unit Value Loading of machine kg 250 Liquor required @ 270% pick-up
litres 675
Liquor circulating in pipes and used for chemicals additions
litres 350
Total litres 1,025 Practical liquor ratio 1:4.1
Page 2 of 5Ultra-low liquor ratio: Myths & facts | TechnoFront | Features | The ITJ
7/10/2010http://www.indiantextilejournal.com/articles/FAdetails.asp?id=1454
Figure 2: Patented THEN-AIRFLOW® machine in cross-section. Liquor circulation shown in RED; air circulation shown in BLUE.
Note absence of dye bath in vessel.
Note in the images above that there is no dye bath in the bottom of the dyeing vessel. AIRFLOW technology instead has all
liquor dripping inside the vessel immediately returned back to the AIRFLOW injection nozzle, via a sump filter. The air is
returned from inside the vessel back to the blower. No fresh outside air is sucked in, so the pressure inside the dyeing kier
remains constant.
In contrast, all other hydraulic and hybrid hydraulic-air systems are based on the mandatory presence of a dye bath and the
use of an overflow jet to inject liquor into fabric. Even if the depth of the dye bath in such machines measures only a couple
of inches, the actual volume of liquor will in principle preclude any liquor ratio even remotely close to that of the AIRFLOW
system, which generally operates with a liquor ratio of only 1:3.5 for cotton, and only 1:2.5 for polyester. This low liquor ratio
can be sustained even when underutilising the vessel, because the total liquor volume required depends almost entirely on
the take-up of the fabric. There is only around 100 to 200 litres of liquor required for circulation (ie, in pumps and
port, and no requirement to fill a dye bath.
Why many dyers remain in the dark about their true liquor ratio
It is not unusual for dyers to challenge these figures – not disputing their accuracy but their uniqueness. Some claim that
their conventional hydraulic machines or even hybrid hydraulic-air machines achieve similarly low liquor ratios. However,
these claims are almost always made without any accurate means of recording the exact amount of water used for each dye
batch – let alone for each process step. Unless a water metre is fitted and each process step is precisely recorded, there is no
scientific way to establish the true liquor ratio in an installed dyeing machine. And since the dye bath is located at the very
bottom of the dye vessel and thus literally in the dark, its true volume is rarely visualised.
Once a water metre is used to monitor a dye process in a conventional hydraulic or hybrid hydraulic-air machine, what was
once praised as a LLR (low liquor ratio) or even ULLR (ultra-low liquor ratio) becomes a very ordinary figure that is easily
surpassed by THEN-AIRFLOW® machines.
It is also not uncommon to encounter liquor ratio calculations that are based on assumed (and optimistically low) fabric pick
up rates – or even their complete omission. In this case, only the amount of liquid required for circulation plus chemicals
additions is considered for calculating liquor ratio. Clearly, any dyer ignoring the amount of liquor going into fabric pick
exposes himself to a very costly illusion.
THEN-AIRFLOW® machines are fitted as standard with controller software that automatically identifies the true fabric pick
rate and tops up – if necessary – the amount of liquor in circulation to prevent pump cavitation.
What can be more important than liquor ratio?
Whilst the liquor ratio is justifiably seen as very important and thus used for even very extravagant claims by promoters of
conventional hydraulic and hybrid hydraulic-air machines, the decisive factor of how profitable a dyeing machine operates is
its overall water consumption per kg of fabric dyed.
In the liquor ratio argument, which AIRFLOW technology easily wins, the focus is on the quantity of dye liquor vs the weight
of processed fabric. However, apart from dyeing, there are other highly water-consuming steps involved in the overall dyeing
process, such as rinsing. Thus, overall water consumption, expressed in litres (l) per kg of fabric, is even more important
when it comes to establishing how economical and ecologically friendly a dyeing process really is.
Page 3 of 5Ultra-low liquor ratio: Myths & facts | TechnoFront | Features | The ITJ
7/10/2010http://www.indiantextilejournal.com/articles/FAdetails.asp?id=1454
Here, too, THEN-AIRFLOW® technology offers impressive system-inherent advantages and benefits, as it allows for an instant
hot drain of dye liquor immediately followed by a “variable power rinse” cycle. In this process step, all dye liquor is drained off
instantly, and rinsing water is showered onto the circulating fabric. As there is no liquor bath in the bottom of any AIRFLOW
machine, the fabric does not drag dye liquor back through the rinsing cycle at any time, thus minimizing rinsing time and
water consumption, as the circulating fabric is not recontaminated with dirty water.
Liquor ratio vs. specific water consumption
Typical water consumption figures for cellulose fabrics (depending on dyestuffs and other parameters) on THEN
machines are:
Bleaching: 11 – 12 l/kg
Light shades: 25 – 33 l/kg
Medium shades: 33 – 38 l/kg
Dark shades: 38 – 50 l/kg
These figures are about 50% lower than those for any other hydraulic or hybrid hydraulic-air machine, and about 75% lower
than those achieved by long-tube jet dyeing machines. And they corroborate the exceptionally low liquor ratio figures attained
by the AIRFLOW system.
Lower water consumption also means lower consumption of eg, steam, salt and other chemicals, plus a much reduced volume
of effluent discharge Under Indian operating conditions, this translates into savings of up to Rs 10 per kg of processed fabrics,
when all is factored in. In an operation dyeing 10 tons per day, this represents up to Rs 3 to 4 crores!
Summary
THEN-AIRFLOW® technology, used worldwide by dyers operating some 2,000 machines, offers the only ultra
in jet dyeing today. This unassailable position is a direct result of its technology that completely does away with a dye bath.
But beyond this, its specific water consumption is dramatically low, too, and this is the figure that determines how profitable
the dyeing process really is. Given today’s water scarcity in many areas and ever higher demands on effluent treatment,
AIRFLOW technology is now rightly emerging as the key to profitable fabric processing in India.
(For further information, contact: Kurt Müller, Area Sales Director, THEN Maschinen GmbH (A Member of Fong's
Industries Group), Milchgrundstraße 32, 74523 Schwäbisch Hall, Germany. Tel: +49 (0)791 403
(0)791 403-166. Cell: +49 (0)173 31 80 890. Email: [email protected]. Web: www.then.de)
published September , 2008
back to Features | back to TechnoFront
Viewpoint Features Features
Signals Sound Positive Good news have come from
industry and government officials:
US and European markets, which
account for 30 - 35 per cent of
textile exports from India, have
CIM: An indispensable
tool Computer Integrated
Manufacturing (CIM) leads to
increased productivity, improved
lead time with lesser work in
Magic Blue: Modular
Denim Wet-
Concepts To keep pace with
stringent demands in the denim
Page 4 of 5Ultra-low liquor ratio: Myths & facts | TechnoFront | Features | The ITJ
7/10/2010http://www.indiantextilejournal.com/articles/FAdetails.asp?id=1454
seen revival of demand across
different sectors. process, improved production and
quality monitoring as well as... market, Goller Modular Denim is
your first choice in woven denim
continuous wet processing...
full viewpoint... more...
Table of Contents Most Recent Issues Write to
Subscribe to ITJ�|��|��|��|�Write to the Editor�|��|��|��|�Rate Card�|��|��|��|�ITJ Ads�|��|��|��|�Tell A Friend�|��|��|��|�About Us�|��|��|��|�Contact Us �|��|��|��|�Login�|��|��|��|�Register
Associated Portals: www.bypd.in�|�www.ipfonline.com�|�www.automotiveproductsfinder.com
© 2010 IPFonline Ltd., All rights reserved. Copyright & Disclaimer IPFonline Ltd.,
Best viewed on Internet Explorer 5.0 or above at a screen resolution of 1024 X 768 pixels.
Page 5 of 5Ultra-low liquor ratio: Myths & facts | TechnoFront | Features | The ITJ
7/10/2010http://www.indiantextilejournal.com/articles/FAdetails.asp?id=1454