Upload
upton
View
24
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Un Partenariat global pour accélérer le progrès vers les OMD grâce à l’Éducation des populations rurales (EPR). A Global Partnership to accelerate progress towards MDGs through Education for Rural People (ERP). ERP is a WSSD partnership bridging: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
Un Partenariat global pour accélérer le
progrès vers les OMDgrâce à l’Éducation des
populations rurales (EPR)
A Global Partnership to accelerate progress
towards MDGs through Education for
Rural People (ERP)
2
ERP is a WSSD partnership bridging:
the agriculture and education sectors efforts
WFS and EFA aims and strategies
L’EPR est un partenariat du SMDD qui relie:
Les efforts dans les domaines de l’éducation et de l’agriculture
Les objectifs et les stratégies du SMA et de l’EPT
3
Why ERP ? WSSD: Only with cross sector collaboration we
can ensure imaginative, coherent and integrated initiative to tackle most intractable problems
Isolation is inefficient, leads to competition, and duplication, wasting of valuable resources and to a “blame culture” .
4
Value added by ERP flagship A focus on MDGs & PRSPs A dynamic intersectoral approach to WFS and EFA
La valeur ajoutée du partenariat EPR Une convergence sur les OMD et le Cadre Strategique de
Croissance et de la Lutte contre la Pauvrété (CSLP) Un approche dynamique et inter-sectorielle á SMA et EPT
5
Main results - cont New alliances between more than 300 partners (Gov.
CSO. IO) ERP integrated into national RD and EFA policies (
Kosovo, China, Venezuela, Mozambique, etc) Capacity developed at national, regional and international l
evel Research results incorporated in national policies
Les principaux résultats – cont Nouvelles alliances parmi plus de 300
partenaires (Gov. OSC, OI) L’EPR intégrée dans les DR nationaux et les
politiques de l’EPT (Kosovo, Chine, Vénézuela, Mozambique, etc)
Competences et capacités développée aux niveaux national, régional et international
Résultats des recherches incorporées dans les politiques nationales.
6
Constraints
Inability to access external resources Competitiveness among sectorsIntolerance (of other sectors)
7
Managing the partnership Light informal coordination mechanism in FAO
fostering: advocacy information sharing and knowledge management Capacity building Global policy making Technical assistance to global, regional or local
initiatives
8
Managing the partnership
FOR THE WORKING GROUPS TO DISCUSS What can each partner bring to the partnership? Information Products Expertise Relationships (with donors, policy makers, community
groups, media, academia, civil society…) People ( seconded, volunteers and interns,
administrative support Resources Common initiatives (such as today's’ one …and …)
9
Managing the partnership
FOR THE WORKING GROUPS TO DISCUSS
What can each partner bring to the ERP partnership:
Local alliances Local consultations Local learning and capacity building on ERP
National activities planned together by MOE and MOA
10
The ERP Challenge: more, differently and better
More investments for rural people Address high unit costs Promote compensatory strategies
Le défi de l’EPR: plus, différemment et mieux
Plus d’investissements en faveur des populations rurales
Faire face aux coùts unitaires élevés Promouvoir des stratégies de compensation
11
The ERP Challenge: more, differently and better
Diversity of situation and needs Targeted, diversified strategies and
supply Intersectoral collaboration Partnership: State – Civil Society –
Private sector
Le défi de l’EPR: plus, différemment et mieux
Reconnaissance de la diversité des situations et des besoins
Diversification des stratégies et provision des services ciblés et diversifiés
Collaboration inter-sectorielle Partenariat : Etat – Société civile – Secteur privé
12
We are having success if
ERP is sustainable and self managing in each country The partnership has an added value in which individual
partners gain significant benefits by: Sharing good experiences Learning from each other Collaborating in a competitive world. Getting political impact and financial support that
individual partners would not receive in isolation
13
Group 1 -Advocacy and coalitions in support of ERP (ADEA, FAR, etc)
Group 2 -3 Trends and modalities in inter-sectoral approaches and collaboration (PRSPs, ONE UN,...) and RP in the context of national, regional and international partnerships, initiatives, organizations (Kossovo, FTI, NEPAD, ...)
Group 4- Committed universities and III education- contribution to ERP, and rural development
14
Education for rural people key for a sustainable worldhttp://www.fao.org/sd/erp/
L’Education pour les populations rurales:la clé pour un monde durable
http://www.fao.org/sd/erp/index_fr.htm