Upload
fay-rose
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
JO TNI
S TA FFCH IE FS OF
CJCSI 3170.01 Revision UpdateCJCSI 3170.01 Revision Update
CAPT Jeff Gernand, J-8CAPT Jeff Gernand, J-8
12 November 200212 November 2002
2
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
JO TNI
S TA FFCH IE FS OF
• Frequently produces stovepiped system solutions • Not necessarily based on the future capabilities required by the joint warfighter. • Acquisition decisions are typically made from a single system perspective, without the benefit of considering impact to interrelated systems.
• Process relies on the experience, judgement, staffing and intuition of decision makers.
• Lacks overarching construct for objective analysis and decision making.
• Systems are developed deconflicted but not necessarily integrated.
• Process lacks prioritization of joint warfighting demands.
• Duplication exists between Services, particularly in ACAT II and III programs.
Current Requirements and Acquisition Process
3
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
JO TNI
S TA FFCH IE FS OF
JR
CapabilitiesBased?
Interoperability?
JROCJROCImpact on:Training?Doctrine?
Leadership?Facilities?
QDR, DPG, CPG
Guidance
Systems• Experience• Staff Support • Judgement• Intuition
Decisions Based on
Current Requirements and Acquisition Process
4
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
JO TNI
S TA FFCH IE FS OF
Decision Process TodayDecision Process Today
NSSNSS NMSNMS
JointJointVisionVision
JPDJPD
JointJointStrategicStrategicReviewReview
ContingencyContingencyPlanningPlanningGuidanceGuidance
CPRCPR
DPGDPGFiscalFiscal
GuidanceGuidanceServiceServicePOMsPOMs PDMsPDMs BudgetBudget
JSCPJSCPCINCCINC
O-PlansO-Plans IPLsIPLs
MAAMAA
MNSMNS
MS “A”MS “A” MS “B”MS “B” MS “C”MS “C”
ORDORD ORDORD
CPACPA
Joint Through CooperationJoint Through Cooperation
Slow ProcessSlow Process
No Direct LinkNo Direct Link
Service OrientedService Oriented
JWCA-Based AnalysisJWCA-Based Analysis
5
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
JO TNI
S TA FFCH IE FS OF
Desired ImprovementsDesired Improvements
• Define How We Fight Up FrontHow We Fight Up Front
• Focus on Capabilities vs. PlatformsCapabilities vs. Platforms
• Process Inclusive of Materiel and Non-Materiel SolutionsInclusive of Materiel and Non-Materiel Solutions
• More Joint Voice EarlyMore Joint Voice Early
• Less Prescriptive Early; More focus on ExperimentationMore focus on Experimentation
• Metrics BasedMetrics Based
• Clear Tie to StrategyClear Tie to Strategy
• Better TieBetter Tie Between Event DrivenEvent Driven and and Calendar DrivenCalendar Driven processes
• Take Advantage of Collaborative Tools to Cut Decision/Staffing Collaborative Tools to Cut Decision/Staffing
TimeTime
6
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
JO TNI
S TA FFCH IE FS OF
Guidance
Systems
• Phase I, II, III BDA• MEA• Target nominations• Special Studies
• Maritime CTL• Phase I, II BDA
• Propose targets• Track JFLCC Targets• Phase I, II BDA• MEA
• Target study• Point mensuration• No strike lists• Target materials• Phase I, II, III BDA
• Phase II BDA;Combat Assessment
• CDL, JNFL, Pre-planned JTL
• Target materials• Target nomination
• Phase I, II BDA; MEA• Tgt. Folders;weaponeering• ATO, JTl
J FC(J OC/ J I C)
J FLCC(ACE)
WOCMAW
J FMCC
F2C2
DCCC
DIA
NMJ IC
J FSOCC
J FACC(AOC)
• Phase I BDA
• Phase I BDA
• Coalition Coordination
Caveats:• Extract fromUSCENTCOM Objective Architecture Concerning Targeting – November 1997 Draft• Nodes; info. exchanges; functions shown do not represent a complete set
MIDBChanges
TargetNominations
BDA Reports(imagery/text)
• BDA Reports (imagery/text)
• Collection Requirements
• BDA Reports (imagery/text)
• Target materials/analysis• BDA Reports (imagery/text)
CollectionRequirements
• Weapon System Video• MISREPs• Combat Reports• Munitions Effects• Target nominations• Target material requests
• Target materials/analysis• BDA Reports (imagery/text)
• BDA Reports (imagery/text)
• Enemy Force Effectiveness• Collection Requirements• Target Nominations • BDA Reports
(imagery/text)
• Weapon System Video• MISREPs• Combat Reports• Munitions Effects• Target nominations• Target material requests• Collection Requirements
A1 A2 A3
A1.2 A3.1 A3.2A1.1
A3.2.1 A3.2.2
A0
ActivityHierarchy
ActivityDiagram
A1
A2
A3
EVENTS/TIME
NODES
NODE 1 NODE 2 NODE 3
EVENT 1
EVENT 2
EVENT 3
EVENT 4 EVENT 5
EVENT 6
EVENT 7 EVENT 8
time 1
time 2
time 3
time 3'
{formula relatingtime 3 to time 3'}
time n
{formula relatingtime 1 to time 2}SATCOM Interface
NODE A
NODE B
NODE C
SYSTEM
2
SYSTEM1
SYSTEM1
SYSTEM3
SYSTEM
4
EXTERNALCONNECTION
SYSTEM1
SYSTEM
2
COMMS Interface
One-way SATCOM Interface
F/A-18A/BF/A-18A/B
Navy T ankers4
E-2CE-2C
F-14DF-14D
F-14A, BF-14A, B
Tactical SurveilP-3C S-3BSH-60 UAVsetc.
Tactical SurveilP-3C S-3BSH-60 UAVsetc.
EA-6BEA-6B
ARC
C2WC3
ASUWC
ASWC
F/A-18 C/D, E/F
JFACCJFACCJFMCCJFMCC
JFLCC JFSOCCJFSOCCNATO Allies
Coalition Allies
JFCJOCJIC
JFCJOCJIC
CWCCWC ACAACAAADCAADC
SWC
A J M
A J
M
A J M
A J
M
A JM
A J M
A J
M
A J M
A J
M
A JM
Joint ElementsNational Theater
DSP SOF OTHR H FDF ASW ArraysFOSICs/FOSIFsetc
E-3 1 U -2RR C-
135V2 EP-3ES-3AU AVsTankers 4
Ships 6
Subs6 etc
Joint ElementsNational Theater
DSP SOF OTHR H FDF ASW ArraysFOSICs/FOSIFsetc
E-3 1 U -2RR C-
135V2 EP-3ES-3AU AVsTankers 4
Ships 6
Subs6 etc
AAWC
AEGIS Cruiser: CG-47 Class*(Alternate, CV)
CICAAWC
AEGIS Cruiser: CG-47 Class*(Alternate, CV)
CIC
A J M
A C J N M R
A J NM Z
A J NM Z
A J N
M ZA J N
M Z A M
A J
NM
Z
A C J M Z
C J
A C M
C
C J
A J N M Z
A J N M Z
A J N M Z
A J NM Z
A C J N M
A C J M Z
A J N M Z
C
M
A J M
A C J N M R
A J NM Z
A J N
M Z
A J N
M ZA J N
M Z A M
A J
NM
Z
A C J M Z
C J
A C M
C
C J
A J N M Z
A J N M Z
A J N M Z
A J NM Z
A C J N M
A C J M Z
A J N M Z
C
M
USAFC ontrolE-3 1 C RCC RE
WeaponsF-15 F-16
ForceA OC
USAFC ontrolE-3 1 C RCC RE
WeaponsF-15 F-16
ForceA OC
C ontrolE-3 1 C RCC RE
WeaponsF-15 F-16
ForceA OC
AEGISDestro yers
DDG-51
AEGISCruisers
C G-47
AircraftCarriers
C V
Other AAWShips
CGN-36/38, DDG-993
Other AAWShipsFFG-7
OtherShips
AEGISDestro yers
DDG-51
AEGISCruisers
C G-47
AircraftCarriers
C V
Other AAWShips
CGN-36/38, DDG-993
Other AAWShipsFFG-7
OtherShips
ForceAAMDC FPTOC
C ontrol Weapons
ArmyForceAAMDC FPTOC
C ontrol WeaponsForceAAMDC FPTOC
C ontrol Weapons
ArmyUSMC
ForceTA CC
C ontrolTA OC / SA AWC /
EWC
WeaponsF/A -18AV-8BHAWK TMDD
USMCForceTA CC
C ontrolTA OC / SA AWC /
EWC
WeaponsF/A -18AV-8BHAWK TMDD
Near Term Operations as of 2003 -- Major Regional Conflict -- Theater Air and Missile Defense functions Sources: Ref J6, J13, J62, J84, J94, J97, N3, N10, N11, N14, N16, N27, F1, B17, R8, R16, S11, S14-S24 Notes for Navy Char ts1 AWACS 2 R IVET JOINT3 Formerly EWC 4 Aerial Refuel ing Aircraft 5May be indirect via Fleet gatew ay6 “ Ships” & “Subs” re fers to vesse ls , w hich a lthough no t an in tegra l part of the J oin t Fo rce, are tasked to provide surv eil lance
• Construct for analysis
• Analytical tool to identify and articulate our requirements
ConceptsConcepts
IntegratedIntegratedArchitecturesArchitectures
JR
Future Capabilities and Acquisition Process
7
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
JO TNI
S TA FFCH IE FS OF
Improved Decision ProcessImproved Decision Process
NMSNMS
Joint VisionJoint Vision
CPRCPR
DPGDPG FiscalFiscalGuidanceGuidance
ServiceServicePOMsPOMs PDMsPDMs BudgetBudget
MS “A”MS “A” MS “B”MS “B” MS “C”MS “C”
CPACPA
CapabilitySolution Sets
ICDICD CDDCDD CPDCPD
NSSNSS
CapstoneCapstoneConceptConcept
FunctionalConcepts
IntegratedJoint
Architecture
MissionMissionNeedsNeeds
AnalysisAnalysis
NewIdeas
ExperimentationExperimentation Illustrative Illustrative Planning Planning
ScenariosScenarios OperatingOperatingConceptsConcepts
ArchitecturesArchitectures
IncrementIncrement
FRPFRP
Collaborative effort with:Collaborative effort with:• OSDOSD• Combatant CommandersCombatant Commanders• Joint StaffJoint Staff• ServicesServices
Analysis TeamsAnalysis Teams• OSDOSD• Combatant Combatant
CommandersCommanders• Joint StaffJoint Staff
• ServicesServices• AgenciesAgencies• LabsLabs• IndustryIndustry
TechnologyR&D
IntegratedIntegratedProcess TeamProcess Team
8
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
JO TNI
S TA FFCH IE FS OF
Improved Decision ProcessImproved Decision Process
NMSNMS
Joint VisionJoint Vision
CPRCPR
DPGDPG FiscalFiscalGuidanceGuidance
ServiceServicePOMsPOMs PDMsPDMs BudgetBudget
MS “A”MS “A” MS “B”MS “B” MS “C”MS “C”
CPACPA
CapabilitySolution Sets
ICDICD CDDCDD CPDCPD
NSSNSS
CapstoneCapstoneConceptConcept
FunctionalConcepts
IntegratedJoint
Architecture
MissionMissionNeedsNeeds
AnalysisAnalysis
NewIdeas
ExperimentationExperimentation Illustrative Illustrative Planning Planning
ScenariosScenarios OperatingOperatingConceptsConcepts
ArchitecturesArchitectures
IncrementIncrement
FRPFRP
Collaborative effort with:Collaborative effort with:• OSDOSD• Combatant CommandersCombatant Commanders• Joint StaffJoint Staff• ServicesServices
Analysis TeamsAnalysis Teams• OSDOSD• Combatant Combatant
CommandersCommanders• Joint StaffJoint Staff
• ServicesServices• AgenciesAgencies• LabsLabs• IndustryIndustry
TechnologyR&D
IntegratedIntegratedProcess TeamProcess Team
AttributesAttributes• Systems born joint
• Anchored in strategy
• Capabilities based
• Speed and effectiveness of decisions
• Clear participation
9
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
JO TNI
S TA FFCH IE FS OF
Improved Decision ProcessImproved Decision Process
NMSNMS
Joint VisionJoint Vision
CPRCPR
DPGDPG FiscalFiscalGuidanceGuidance
ServiceServicePOMsPOMs PDMsPDMs BudgetBudget
MS “A”MS “A” MS “B”MS “B” MS “C”MS “C”
CPACPA
CapabilitySolution Sets
ICDICD CDDCDD CPDCPD
NSSNSS
CapstoneCapstoneConceptConcept
FunctionalConcepts
IntegratedJoint
Architecture
MissionMissionNeedsNeeds
AnalysisAnalysis
TechnologyR&D
NewIdeas
ExperimentationExperimentation Illustrative Illustrative Planning Planning
ScenariosScenarios OperatingOperatingConceptsConcepts
ArchitecturesArchitectures
IncrementIncrement
FRPFRP
Collaborative effort with:Collaborative effort with:• OSDOSD• Combatant CommandersCombatant Commanders• Joint StaffJoint Staff• ServicesServices
Analysis TeamsAnalysis Teams• OSDOSD• Combatant Combatant
CommandersCommanders• Joint StaffJoint Staff
• ServicesServices• AgenciesAgencies• LabsLabs• IndustryIndustry
IntegratedProcess Team
In final draft for CJCS approval
CJCS signed 28 Oct
Due to SECDEF Dec 06 (snowflake)
10
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
JO TNI
S TA FFCH IE FS OF
Future Capabilities and Acquisition Process
Oversight
RequirementsAcquisition
D
O
T
M
L
P
F
Approved
ICD
MS A
Analysis of
Capability Solution
SetsDemo
Demo Increment 1Increment 1
Demo
Demo
Demo
Demo
Increment 2Increment 2
Increment 3Increment 3
MS B
MS C
MS B MS C
MS B MS C
Refinement of Solution Sets
CDD
CPD
Capability and Technology Development
LRIP
LRIP
LRIP
FRPSDD
JROC DAB
ICD - Initial Capabilities DocumentCDD - Capabilities Development DocumentCPD - Capabilities Production Document
JROC DAB
JROC DAB
FCBFCBProcessProcess
11
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
JO TNI
S TA FFCH IE FS OF
Functional Capability BoardFunctional Capability Board
• Membership– Flag officer from the lead Combatant Commander– Non-flag officer representatives Combatant Commanders,
Services, OSD, Joint Staff and appropriate agencies
• Authority– Develop functional concept and associated architecture
operational views – Validate ACAT II / III capability documents
• Responsibility– Conduct mission area analysis to identify joint requirements– Develop material and non-material alternatives that achieve
desired joint capabilities– Evaluate proposed material and non-material changes using
JROC approved metrics– Re-validate concepts and architectures on an annual basis– Prioritize requirements within functional area
12
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
JO TNI
S TA FFCH IE FS OF
Mission AreaFunctional Concept
Integrated Arch
Collaborative Mission Area Analysis
Mission Needs
Analysis
DOTLPF Changes
CJCSI 3180
Process
- Materiel -CJCSI 3170
process
Ideas for Materiel
Approaches
Independent Analysis
of Materiel Approaches
D
O
T
M
L
P
F
Alternative 1
Alternative 2
ICD
ACAT I orSpecial InterestMS A – JROC/DAB
DAB AoA
FCB
ICD
ACAT II and below Non-Special Interest
MS A – FBC/MDA
MDA
CDDCPD
Overarching PolicyNSS/NMS/Joint Vision
Joint Capstone Concept
Functional Capabilities Board Functional Capabilities Board ProcessProcess
13
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
JO TNI
S TA FFCH IE FS OF
Mission AreaFunctional Concept
Integrated Arch
Collaborative Mission Area Analysis
Capability AssessmentGap - or Not
DOTLPF Changes
CJCSI 3180
Process
MaterielCJCSI 3170
process
Ideas for Materiel
Approaches
Independent analysis
of concepts
D
O
T
M
L
P
F
Alternative 1
Alternative 2
ICD
ACAT I orSpecial InterestMS A – JROC/DAB
DAB AoA
FCB
ICD
ACAT II and below Non-Special Interest
MS A – FCB/MDA
MDA
Gatekeeper
Service Requirements
Process
Joint Impact
JCPAT Stage I review
ServiceUnique
Complete JCPAT Review
Additional FCBs
Service initiated idea Overarching PolicyNSS/NMS/Joint Vision
Joint Capstone ConceptICD/CDD/CPDCDDCPD
Service Input to the FCBService Input to the FCB
14
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
JO TNI
S TA FFCH IE FS OF
D
O
T
M
L
P
F
Approved
Enterprise Architecture
ICD
MS A
Analysis of
Capability Solution
SetsDemo
Demo Increment 1Increment 1
Demo
Demo
Demo
Demo
Increment 2Increment 2
Increment 3Increment 3
MS B
MS C
MS B MS C
MS B MS C
Refinement of Solution Sets
CDD
CPD
Capability and Technology Development
LRIP
LRIP
LRIP
FRPSDD
Oversight
RequirementsAcquisition
JROC DAB
ICD - Initial Capabilities DocumentCDD - Capabilities Development DocumentCPD - Capabilities Production Document
JROC DAB
JROC DAB
Future Capabilities and Acquisition Process
FCBFCBProcessProcess
15
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
JO TNI
S TA FFCH IE FS OF
NO BOUNDARIESNO BOUNDARIESNO BOUNDARIESNO BOUNDARIES
UNITED STATESATLANTIC COMMAND
U S MOCA
J O TNI
S T AF FC H I E F S OF
JOINT OPERATIONS MEAN INTEGRATION JOINT OPERATIONS MEAN INTEGRATION NOT DECONFLICTIONNOT DECONFLICTION