49
Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Understanding Above Ground Tools

ACCA and ACVG

Gord Parker

CTW 2005 – Calgary

Page 2: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Introduction

• NACE approves 4 tests for determining Coating Condition• AC Current Attenuation• AC Voltage Gradient• DC Voltage Gradient• Pearson Method

• ‘old school’

• Note CIS is NOT one of them• Does not find small defects.

Page 3: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Introduction

• Before joining the Pipeline / Corrosion industry, my schooling was Electronics Engineering Technology.

• This ppt focuses on 2 of the tests ACCA/VG

• Both these inspection techniques are very electrical in nature and are well explained by simple Ohm’s law.

Page 4: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

ACCA Introduction

• AC Current Attenuation

• Sometimes called the EM method BUT it doesn’t do anything really tricky with electromagnetics.• I personally think RP0502 should have this reworded

• Simply uses Gauss & Faraday’s well proven laws that the strength of an EM field is proportional to the current through a conductor.

• Working backwards, knowing the EM strength & conductor depth, we can calculate the current.

Page 5: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

ACCA Application

• Apply a known and consistent I.

• Measure the current at points along the line.

• Calculate a loss/distance ratio

• Alternately factor in diameter for loss/*area* ratio to compare different diameters

• More loss/distance = worse coating.

• Current loss can also indicate unknown connections, insulator and casing problems.

Page 6: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

dB Current

• Expressing current loss as a ratio to current before the loss is more accurate.

• deciBels are a ratio

• Next chart: Loss 1 = ~1000 mA, 2~400, and #3~150.

• Loss 1 *looks* much worse but expressed in dB all are the same. Hence all three features (T’s to similar service mains) are the same size/length.

Page 7: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Current Attenuation Graph

3 steps are different looking in mA but nearly identical in dB

Page 8: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Common Problems

• Current goes UP as you walk away from Tx• Current returning to ground point is sufficiently

concentrated near Tx ground stake to create an EM field that cancels out some of the EM field on the pipe.

• Returns to normal attenuation after ~100m

• Current fluctuates down the line • * Can’t GAIN Current walking away from Source• We are detecting EM fields and they can be distorted by

large metallic objects and other EM fields• Reduce bonds / bleed-over• Some places you just can’t take a reading.

• Deep >10-18’ pipes can sometimes be a problem.

Page 9: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary
Page 10: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary
Page 11: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Using ‘TrendLine’ function in Excel

Page 12: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Bad Example #1Example of current that goes up @ reading #47

Also, survey is using <20mA, small errors look big, better to use 100mA+

Survey done with locate frequency, not low (ie:4Hz)

Page 13: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Bad Example #2

Same data but shown on Log vert. axis.

See how first 60% now looks more even compared to linear graph previously.

Segments 0-10 are worse then 10-40

Current can’t go up by any amount, never mind double

Page 14: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

AC Frequency• Even through a perfect coating, an AC

signal will bleed off due to capacitive coupling to the ground outside the coating.

• Higher f = higher attenuation.

Page 15: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Bad Example #2

Same graph as previously.

In my opinion, the high attenuation near the beginning is only due to the higher frequency (remember this was done at a locate freq, not 4Hz).

Page 16: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Shielded defects …..

• Higher frequency I will bleed off faster.

• Capacitive impedance drops as f• Remembering we are detecting current loss,

does disbonded coating have a lower impedance?• i.e.: does the pipe-coating-dirt model lose

current faster then the pipe-electrolyte-coating-dirt ? Why ? (the electrolyte isn’t grounded)

Page 17: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Distribution of current. 1kHz vs. 4Hz

1A (1KHz)

400mA

600m

A

200mA

400m

A

1A (4Hz)

40mA

960m

A

900mA

60m

Afault

Because of an overall lower impedance at higher frequencies, current will travel down stubs and short mains (and attenuate faster on all runs).

It also bleeds through what are actually good (DC) insulators.

Surveying at a lower frequency will more accurately mimic where your CP current is going.

Page 18: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Low frequencies go to the short

Page 19: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Troubleshooting Loops

• Current Direction can be seen above ground without contact.

Page 20: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Benefits and Strengths

• Easy to operate by one single operator

• No direct contact to ground necessary

• Near DC fault detection signal makes capacitive effects insignificant

• Low frequency for pipe detection: long distances

• Current Direction facility to enable short identification

• With addition of earth-frame, often same hardware can be used for an AC Voltage Gradient survey.

Page 21: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Benefits and Strengths II

Previously Difficult situations:

• Casings – Now, just check if here is a current loss

• Insulators – If both zones have similar potential, there could be a question as to if insulator is shorted. But in Current Mapping, if there is current getting through to far side piping, there is a short.

• Bonds – large current loss and/or direction reversal show below grade bonds very easily.

Page 22: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Difficult Applications

• We are locating current flow and current does not travel into an open circuit.• Insulating flanges and fittings (ZapLock, Bell&Spigot,

Dresser) will limit current flow along a length of pipe.

• This is still valuable information to locate these and verifies their proper operation.

• Congested areas – confusing EM

• Older equipment was subject to 50/60 Hz interference• Newer circuitry ‘sees’ PCM current through other EM noise.

Page 23: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

The Effect of Insulators (i.e.: Dressers™, ZapLock, Bell/Spigots in some conditions.)

• When low resistance connection is in effect, current distribution is uniform

• PCM shows 50/50 split of current

• When joint goes high resistance, current splits unevenly

• PCM (& CP) current drops to undetectable level ahead of open

• (Is still protected – potential is maintained, just takes less current)

Page 24: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Mg Anodes

• Anodes will provide a path to ground for the AC signals we are detecting (4Hz and locate freqs.).

• It may look like a loss but likely a big one

• Any current this big is a short (casing, other utility, insulator), so look for 4 Hz somewhere else as current has to go somewhere. If nowhere else, is a Mg.

• Amount of signal loss will be proportional to anode quality / life expectancy.

Page 25: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary
Page 26: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Underground Gas Distribution Short to Water

• Quite prevalent, especially in warmer climates (water lines more shallow)

• Hard to find without excavation

• PCM method walked technician right to it.

• Picture of site on next slide

Page 27: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Underground Gas Short

Page 28: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

CASE I

N

DE

DE

DE

DE

Insulator

Mainline Insulator DE

100 ma

94 ma

400

ma

No

Sig

nal

475

ma

600 ma95

0 m

a80

5 m

a70

0 m

a

500

ma

2.50 A

100

ma

No

Sig

nal

98 m

a

78 m

a

1.60 A

DE

375 ma450 ma

2.60 A

Typical Mag. anode - connected

Area Rectifier - Anodes used as PCM ground & PCM set @ 3 amperes output

MSA not insulated - 875 ma found on

gas serviceline

875

ma

578

ma

110 ma

Page 29: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

2nd Distribution Example

Page 30: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Transmission Coating Survey (and bad insulator)

• Started as just a demonstration, no known problems on line.• Upon connecting transmitter, 85% of signal going in one direction !?!• Drive to next road crossing (only ~1200m) and had already lost 90%

of remaining current, thus problem is between road and transmitter• Perform survey towards transmitter, find 2 areas of higher than

average loss• Found major loss across one point, investigation found a shorted

insulator in underground T connection to foreign compressor site.• If both systems had similar protection levels, a CIPS may not have

shown any defect. • If short had gone unnoticed, stray currents could develop causing

problems and/or rectifier power bills /current rating could be higher than necessary.

Page 31: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Transmission Coating Survey

Page 32: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

ACCA Questions ?

Page 33: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

ACVG

• AC Voltage Gradient

• Like DCVG / Pin-to-pin / similar but uses a transmitter, not the CP DC

• Sizing similar to DCVG• Empirical testing now underway

Page 34: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

ACVG

• An improvement though is to tightly tune the voltmeter to the transmitter frequency

• A Fluke® on DC can find other sources:• Stray current, sacrificial anodes, dissimilar

metals

• A Fluke® on AC isn’t tuned:• Any AC frequency from ~5 Hz - 25kHz

• 60 Hz.AC currents/faults, telephone/scada noise

Page 35: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Pool of PotentialIs AC, but at any instant in time, there is a direction.

Page 36: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

ACVG

• Sometimes part of an ACCA tool

• Is a big AC voltmeter

• Voltmeter Leads are the probes

• Results in dB gives very wide dynamic range

• Calibrated amplification reduces a variable

• Consistent lead spacing (a-frame) removes one other variable

Page 37: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

ACVG Receiver Theory

Page 38: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

ACVG

• Faults (on an otherwise good cable) have been found exceeding 6.8 MΩ

• Very sensitive as it has an extremely high signal-noise ratio

Page 39: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

AC Voltage Gradient• Can be part of Current tools

• Becoming very popular

• Extreme sensitivity

• Rejection of interference

• Very accurate location of faults• typically better then 6"

• Sometimes part of Current Attenuation equipment

• This method deserves to be considered as a solid tool for integrity and the ECDA process.

Page 40: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

ACVG in Operation

• Both signal strength and direction arrows lead user to holiday.

• Fault value is proportional to holiday size and soil resistivity.

Page 41: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

• In this case the next fault was quite close (20-30m) which is why the left side of graph climbs quickly.

• Other cases may show 100s of meters of signal at 30 and under..

Page 42: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

ACVG Tuning

• Older systems used a simple DMM• Does not tune to any one frequency

• 60 Hz, cable earth faults, telecom noise Rx’d

• Very tight tuning in the signal generator and receiver effectively increases sensitivity as it ignores current from other sources• SNR improves

Page 43: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

ACVG Find• Transversal A-frame dB

readings: 80 (right) and 85 (l)• dB (from PCM) before fault=

49.85,after= 49.48• Distance between readings =

15 meters• 37mB/15m (actually just fault)• Pipe dia.= 12”/PE in two layers• Soil res. @fault:817.63 Ohm x

m• Fault size = 60 mm length x 2

mm wide• Note the higher trans dB

reading on left side that is the same side where valve station is located

Page 44: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Dig Pictures

Page 45: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Jordanian Fire Water Line 16”/30yr old

• “We are using this equipment for locating coating defects on the coal tar epoxy coated pipelines. While doing survey on the pipeline we got 63 dB microvolt with A-Frame. The epicenter of the defect was located by taking readings above and in line with the pipeline and perpendicular to the pipeline. From all four sides direction of arrow was indicated towards the defect. The defect location was excavated.

• “Upon excavation, we could not find bare pipe at this location. What we found was that the coating has degraded badly and it has become permeable. This has happened at two locations.

• “Please advise if the current is flowing through the permeable coating or there are other reasons.”

Page 46: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Sarvjit Singh Corrpro Companies Middle East L.L.C Client : Jordan Petroleum Refinery Company

Page 47: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Sarvjit Singh Corrpro Companies Middle East L.L.C Client : Jordan Petroleum Refinery Company

Page 48: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

My Favorite ACCA/VG Story

• 2 mile long distribution main, 25 yr old

• For last 4 years, potentials have been dropping

• Several surveys showed no shorts

• ACCA: in each 100’ span, current was dropping like a rock but no single point of trouble

• ACVG: BAM… BAM… every 40’

• Had spent 40+ person-hours with no resolution. In 45 minutes we found and quantified the problem. The customer could budget digging up 6’ of every 40’ to replace the joint coating.

Page 49: Understanding Above Ground Tools ACCA and ACVG Gord Parker CTW 2005 – Calgary

Thank You

• Questions?

• Gord Parker, C.E.T.

• Spectrum XLI (Calgary, Alberta)

• 403-585-2397

[email protected]

• www. spectrumxli.com