Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The University of San FranciscoUSF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library |Geschke Center
Master's Projects and Capstones Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects
Spring 5-19-2017
Understanding the complex relationships betweenclimate, vegetation, and foraging behavior of aclimate-sensitive alpine mammal in order to explainpatterns of persistenceEvan ColeUniversity of San Francisco, [email protected]
Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone
Part of the Other Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons
This Project/Capstone is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects at USF Scholarship: a digitalrepository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Projects and Capstones by an authorized administratorof USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. For more information, please contact [email protected].
Recommended CitationCole, Evan, "Understanding the complex relationships between climate, vegetation, and foraging behavior of a climate-sensitive alpinemammal in order to explain patterns of persistence" (2017). Master's Projects and Capstones. 566.https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone/566
This Master's Project
Understanding the complex relationships between climate, vegetation,
and foraging behavior of a climate-sensitive alpine mammal
in order to explain patterns of persistence
by
Evan Cole
is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements
for the degree of:
Master of Science
in
Environmental Management
at the
University of San Francisco
Submitted: Received:
5/17/17
...................................……….. ................................………….
Evan Cole Date John Callaway, Ph.D. Date
Table of Contents
Abstract …………………………………………………………………………………………1
Background …………………………………………………………………………………….2
- Mountain Ecosystems - Study Organism: The American Pika - Current Status and Distribution - A Model Organism - Vegetation as a predictive variable: A brief literature review
Research Methods …………………………………………………………………………..10
Results ………………………………………………………………………………………...11
- What plant characteristics are important to pikas, and how do they influence behavior and survival?
- How do pikas alter their local plant community? - How does climate (and climate change) influence pika persistence and alpine
plant communities?
Discussion ……………………………………………………………………………………36
- Climate and Forage Tightly Linked - Conditional Importance of Plant Secondary Chemistry - Interactive Effects of Climate on Forage Selectivity and Availability - Lessons from an Indicator Species
Management Recommendations …………………………………………………………40
- Habitat Restoration and Enhancement - Legal and Regulatory Actions - Adaptive Capacity as a Conservation Metric
Appendix ………………………………………………………………………………………43
Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………………………51
Literature Cited ………………………………………………………………………………51
Page 1 of 62
Abstract
Mountain ecosystems offer substantial ecosystem services but are highly sensitive to
climate change. The American pika (Ochotona princeps) serves as an indicator species
of climate change and a model organism for studying its impacts on mountain
mammals. Certain aspects of plant community composition and structure can function
as predictors of pika distribution, but understanding the links between climate, forage
quality, and foraging behavior is necessary to identify the mediating mechanism. Pika
foraging pressure help shape the local plant community, which can confound modeling
efforts and must be considered when evaluating the influence of vegetation on pika
persistence. Plant Secondary Metabolites (PSMs) appear to be the most important
indicators of forage quality, driving winter diet selection, especially in high elevation
areas with extreme seasonality. Nutritional components, such as protein, nitrogen, and
water content, are more important to summer diet. Foraging selectivity for nutritional
components changes in response to environmental conditions and forage availability,
suggesting increased importance as climate warms and dries. While metrics of heat
stress, cold stress, and water budget appear to be significant divers of pika distribution,
the heterogeneity with which climate impacts pikas across their range calls for a place-
based perspective. The transformation of alpine plant communities in response to
climate change may further stress pika populations as preferred forage items become
scarcer. Pikas highlight the complexity and idiosyncrasy of alpine ecosystems. In order
to address the challenges faced by pikas, managers should identify refugia and
vulnerable populations, install plants high in PSMs and nutritional components, work to
control invasive plants, consider legal and regulatory protections, and expand
monitoring efforts.
Page 2 of 62
Background
Mountain Ecosystems
Covering nearly a quarter of the Earth’s land surface, mountains are quite literally
springs of life and civilization. Functioning as natural water towers, mountains are the
ultimate source of drinking water, hydroelectricity, and irrigation for 40% of the world’s
population (UNESCO 2014). Steep topographic and vegetative gradients promote high
beta and gamma diversity, and most of the protected landscapes across the western
U.S. and the world are in mountains (Beever et al. 2013). Additionally, mountains are
key sources of timber, mineral resources, medicinal plants, and flood control, as well as
significant recreational opportunities and aesthetic value. These vital ecosystem
services, which reach well beyond the isolated geography of mountain ecosystems, are
becoming increasingly jeopardized by global change.
Mountain ecosystems serve as early warning indicators of climate change impacts, but
further attention and research are necessary to adequately interpret the signals. High-
elevation areas are warming at a significantly accelerated rate compared to low-
elevation areas (Figure 1) due to a variety of potential mechanisms and interacting
feedback loops, such as the loss of snow and ice and the associated reduction in
albedo, the increasing release of latent heat in the high atmosphere as water vapor
condenses, and the cooling effect of aerosols at lower elevations (Pepin et al. 2015).
Despite our reliance on mountain ecosystems for ecological, economic, and recreational
benefits, they are poorly monitored due to their isolated nature. Long-term climatic
trends are difficult to characterize for high-elevation areas, as meteorological stations
become increasingly sparse at higher elevations (Pepin 2015). Mountain ecosystems
offer a unique laboratory for studying the ecological implications of climate change, and
understanding how these sentinels of global change respond can inform conservation
strategies and secure essential natural resources for the future.
Page 3 of 62
Figure 1. Rate of warming is greater at high elevations. Note that average temperatures are lower at high
elevations. (Beever 2016)
Study Organism: The American Pika
The American pika (Ochotona princeps) is a small, egg-shaped mammal found in alpine
and subalpine ecosystems of western North America. Though commonly mistaken for a
rodent, the pika is actually in the order Lagomorpha and is related to rabbits and hares.
The pika is a generalist herbivore, feeding upon a variety of available vegetation, and a
habitat specialist, generally found only on rocky outcroppings and talus slopes (Dearing
1996). One defining life history trait of the pika is that it does not hibernate, instead
Page 4 of 62
caching plant material in haypiles, upon which it feeds throughout the winter while most
other vegetation has died back (Dearing 1997a). While the pika is typically considered
diurnal, it can shift its behavior to be crepuscular or even nocturnal based on stressful
environmental conditions, such as high daytime temperatures (Smith 1974). Pikas are
highly territorial, with a single individual occupying its own home range, and maximum
dispersal distances are likely around just 10-20 km (USFWS 2010). Despite its small
size and undeniably adorable disposition, the pika is actually quite hardy and highlights
the rugged adaptability of high elevation species.
Current Status and Distribution
Widely considered an indicator species, or ‘canary in the coal mine,’ foreshadowing
climate change impacts on montane mammals, the American pika has garnered
significant interest from scientists and the environmental community. Due to the isolated
and limited extent of its habitat (talus fields and rocky outcroppings), as well as its small
size, limited mobility, and poor thermoregulation, the pika is extremely sensitive to
climatic changes (Castillo et al. 2014). Recent studies have shown evidence of
widespread distributional loss, including upslope retractions and local extirpations, with
climate change implicated as a likely cause (Beever et al. 2016a). Population shifts
have varied by region, with steeper declines observed in the Great Basin compared to
the Sierra Nevada. In fact, a recent study involving resurveying nearly one thousand
talus patches in three geographic regions – the Sierra Nevada, Great Basin, and
northern Utah – found extirpations of the pika from five of nine sites in the Great Basin
(sites defined as all talus patches within a 3 km radius of a historical occupancy record)
and eleven of twenty-nine sites in northeastern California (sites defined as all talus
patches within a 1 km radius of a historical occupancy record, consistent with earlier
survey methods in that area). Strikingly, even though pikas had been observed in Zion
National Park and Cedar Breaks National Monument in northern Utah as recently as
2011 and 2012, respectively, the study concluded that they are now extirpated from
both locations. Despite growing concern, the American pika was denied listing by the
US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) in 2010, and another petition was rejected in
September 2016; the reasoning in both cases was cited as lack of substantial evidence
Page 5 of 62
demonstrating a need for federal protections based on the range of identified threats.
Further study and monitoring of climate change impacts on pika range, distribution, and
population dynamics can inform management decisions for the benefit of both the
species and the entire ecosystem.
A Model Organism
Due to its distinctive life history, behavioral patterns, and sensitivity to climatic stressors,
the American pika is considered an excellent model organism for studying the impacts
of climate change on montane mammals. Firstly, the pika is uniquely sensitive to rising
temperatures due to its low physiological tolerance for heat – succumbing to
hyperthermia in as little as 6 hours of exposure to 25.5 °C (77.9 °F) (Smith 1974) and 2
hours of exposure to 28 °C (82.4 °F) (MacArthur and Wang 1973). The cage
experiments utilized by Smith (1974) and MacArthur and Wang (1973), though tragic for
the participating pikas, offered a valuable indication of the animal’s upper physiological
tolerance for heat – a metric that would be difficult to obtain by today’s ethics standards.
Second, pikas are locally abundant and easily detectable. While most mammals are
nocturnal (70%; Bennie et al. 2014) and are monitored primarily using camera traps and
tagging, pikas are diurnal or crepuscular, depending upon the locality and season, and
can be easily observed. Their distinct vocalizations, used for conspecific attraction,
announcing territory, and signaling alarm (Ray et al. 1991), as well as their large
haypiles, scat, and urine stains on the talus (personal communication), provide further
evidence of occupation. Additionally, their populations display relatively high interannual
stability, which decreases the likelihood of incorrectly identifying a patch as extirpated
due to a sudden and temporary drop in the local population (Beever et al. 2010). Finally,
the pika is a habitat specialist, relying upon talus patches and rocky outcroppings, which
makes it easier to locate and monitor pika metapopulations. Individual pikas do not
share territories (Peacock 1997), which are typically only about 20 meters in diameter
(Moyer-Horner et al. 2016). Maximum dispersal distances are generally considered to
be just a few hundred meters (Castillo et al. 2014). Due to its isolated nature, talus
habitat has largely escaped direct transformation or degradation by humans and is
relatively stable across biologically relevant timescales, which allows researchers to
Page 6 of 62
evaluate the effects of climate independent of habitat loss (Beever et al. 2010). As an
indicator species within a larger sentinel of global change – mountain ecosystems – the
pika offers a first look at the mechanisms of biological response to climate change.
Understanding the factors that mediate this biological response, either through direct
climatic stress or through indirect impacts like altered food or water availability, may
help managers to preserve the species and get ahead of further ecological
consequences.
Vegetation as a predictive variable: A brief literature review
While climate has been implicated as the primary driver of rapid range shifts and
extirpations of pika populations in the Great Basin (Beever et al. 2010, 2011, 2016) and
in other parts of its range (Erb et al. 2011, Calkins et al. 2012, Jeffress et al. 2013),
vegetation (i.e., plant community composition and structure) has been suggested as a
potential mechanism to either buffer or facilitate climate impacts. Recent attempts to
characterize this relationship between climate, vegetation, and pika persistence have
largely focused upon margins and leading-edges of the pika’s range (Rpdhouse et al.
2010, Varner and Dearing 2014, Varner et al. 2015, 2016). Range margins often feature
atypical habitat or microclimates that allow the species to persist where it otherwise
could not, making them ideal locations for research into the mechanisms and
determinants of range limitations, the effects of extreme environmental conditions and
stress on individuals and populations, and the adaptive capacity of the study organism
(Ray et al. 2016, Varner et al. 2016).
Metrics of forb cover seem to be the most prevalent and significant predictors of pika
occupancy or population density across most studies. Though relatively less abundant
among the talus – more commonly found in nearby alpine meadows or the talus margin
– forbs are selectively collected and cached by pikas and make up a relatively large
portion of the winter haypile (Huntly et al. 1986). The Plant Secondary Metabolites
(PSMs), particularly phenolics, found in many forbs act as preservatives and deter the
pikas from eating the plants until the winter and spring months when the compounds
have degraded (Dearing 1997). At Lava Beds National Monument, a range margin with
Page 7 of 62
atypically warm and arid conditions for the pika, the two best predictors of site-use
intensity have been metrics of graminoid:forb cover and total forb cover (Ray et al.
2016). The ratio of graminoid:forb cover serves as a metric for plant secondary
chemistry, as graminoids do not contain PSMs while forbs are generally high in them,
and indicates the importance of PSMs to pika occupancy dynamics. Forb cover was
also implicated as a key predictor of pika occupancy in the range periphery lava flow
habitat of Craters of the Moon National Monument and Preserve (Rodhouse et al.
2010). In Glacier National Park, a leading-edge of the pika’s range that could represent
an important refugium as the climate warms, average forb height and moss cover – an
evergreen, persistent food source – have been demonstrated as the two strongest
predictors of short-term pika occurrence (Moyer-Horner et al. 2016). Forb height
suggests the importance of plant morphology for facilitating the efficient gathering of
winter haypile components (Millar and Zwickel 1972). Interestingly, relative forb cover
outperformed absolute cover of forbs or graminoids in Glacier National Park, indicating
that there may be an interactive effect between forb and graminoid cover that is more
important than the total cover of either plant type. Studies in the Southern Rocky
Mountains have suggested similar measures of vegetation quality – the diversity and
relative cover of forbs – to be superior predictors of pika population density (Erb et al.
2014). This growing evidence of correlations between metrics of forb cover and pika
distribution, considering the established importance of forbs to pika behavior and diet,
indicates a potentially significant link between forage quality and pika persistence and
also raises the question of what other plant qualities and types may be influential.
A few studies in the Great Basin have incorporated broad vegetative components into
larger analyses of climate-mediated extirpations, but these have been limited in spatial
and temporal scope, as well as in the types of vegetative predictors considered. In
agreement with finding from other parts of the pika’s range, relative forb cover has been
demonstrated as a powerful predictor of pika persistence in the Great Basin (Wilkening
2007, Wilkening et al. 2011). Overall vegetation cover, foliar cover, and relative tree
cover negatively correlate with pika persistence, perhaps because a dense canopy
impedes a pika’s ability to surveil its territory and provides perches for predatory birds
Page 8 of 62
(Wilkening 2007). Sites with higher mean summer temperatures and lower relative
cover of forbs show greater rates of extirpation, potentially indicating that pikas in areas
with less forb cover must expose themselves to more heat stress as they spend more
time searching for suitable plant material for their winter haypile (Wilkening 2011).
However, this inverse relationship between mean summer temperature and relative forb
cover may simply reflect the long-term climate’s simultaneous influence on plant
community composition and pika population dynamics, as xeric conditions may limit
both forbs and pikas.
Pikas in atypical habitats spend more time foraging and less time haying, reflecting the
warmer winters and greater winter forage availability found at lower elevations.
Research at the Columbia River Gorge, a range margin characterized by higher
temperatures and lower elevations than those typically occupied by pikas, has
demonstrated a strong relationship between plant community composition and pika
persistence, as well as provided a unique example of climate adaptation through dietary
plasticity – the shifting of diet to accommodate what food items are available. Here,
vegetation species richness and percentage moss cover have been shown to be the
most significant predictors of pika density (Varner et al. 2015). Dietary plasticity through
utilization of moss is a key adaptation that pikas exhibit in order to exist in such atypical,
harsh environments (Varner and Dearing 2014). More than 60% of the pika’s diet
consists of moss in some areas of the Columbia River Gorge, more than has been
observed for any wild mammalian herbivore. In contrast to the seasonal growth and die-
back of grasses and forbs, moss is available year-round, releasing pikas from needing
to collect and store sizeable haypiles for winter during the summer and early fall
months, and thereby minimizing energy expenditure and exposure to extreme heat
(Varner et al. 2016). In fact, the Siberian northern pika (Ochotona hyperborea) actively
avoids evergreen forbs, cushion plants, mosses, and lichens when collecting for its
haypile, as those types of forage are available throughout winter and do not need to be
cached (Gliwicz et al. 2006), further suggesting that the relative value of grazed plants
compared to hayed plants may depend upon local climatic and environmental factors.
Page 9 of 62
The reliance on moss also reduces the need for pikas to venture away from the talus to
forage, mitigating the risk of predation.
As further evidence of adaptive utilization of vegetation, pikas existing in atypical
habitats are more likely to be found in forested habitat away from the talus during
midday compared to pikas existing in the more typical, high-elevation habitat of nearby
Mt. Hood, suggesting the potential for forested stands to act as thermal refuge off the
talus (Varner et al. 2016). Pikas in the atypical habitats of the Columbia River Gorge
exhibit higher population density and smaller home ranges than their high elevation
counterparts, but do not display increased signs of territoriality, suggesting an
abundance of local resources or a decrease in territoriality due to the lack of a need to
defend large winter hay piles. Although it is important to note the potential influence of
genetic differentiation between the two study groups, which would indicate genetic
adaptation rather than behavioral plasticity, evidence from range margins like the
Columbia River Gorge highlight the mediating power of vegetation in pika persistence in
the face of climatic stress.
Though limited, recent research has demonstrated a clear, if difficult to interpret,
relationship between pika occurrence and certain metrics of vegetation quality. In an
attempt to explain the apparent significance of vegetation’s role in determining pika
distribution, three general hypotheses have been proposed: 1) quality of available
forage is important for pika persistence, 2) pikas shape the composition and structure of
the local plant community and so the perceived relationship merely reflects correlation
rather than causation, and 3) microclimate is the true driver affecting pikas and plants
simultaneously (Wilkening et al. 2011, Ray et al. 2016). Though the interactions
between pikas, their respective plant communities, and microclimate are complex,
understanding the mechanisms of persistence and extirpation in the face of a changing
climate is essential for developing useful conservation strategies. Further research with
expanded spatial and temporal scopes, such as in this study, may help rank these three
hypotheses and elucidate the mechanisms of biological response to climate change. In
the following sections, I address these three explanations in order to provide context for
Page 10 of 62
my primary research and to clarify the mechanisms at work that potentially produce the
correlations I have identified.
For the main, secondary research portion of this paper, I seek to identify how climate,
vegetation, and pika foraging behavior interact to produce evident correlations between
pika persistence/extirpation and various plant community features. In order to
characterize this relationship, I pose three sub-questions:
1) What plant characteristics are important to pikas, and how do they influence
behavior and survival?
2) How do pikas alter their local plant community?
3) How does climate (and climate change) influence pika persistence and alpine
plant communities?
Building off these findings, the appendix includes a preliminary investigation into the
vegetative features that potentially predict pika occurrence in the Great Basin. This
primary research complements the main portion of the paper as an example of how
statistical analyses can be utilized to test hypotheses based on pika foraging dynamics.
Research Methods
In order to address my overall research question and subquestions, I employed
secondary research methods through the evaluation of the peer-reviewed literature and
personal communications with researchers in the field. The researchers I conferred with
were able to direct me to pertinent journal articles and studies, as well to advise my
statistical analyses featured in the appendix. I attended a professional conference
where I was able to view presentations on the latest research, participate in working
groups to discuss and address key issues related to pika conservation, and meet with
some of the researchers cited in this paper. In particular, I learned about the research
conducted by Wickhem (2016), which utilized cafeteria-style experiments to assess pika
foraging preferences. This study emphasized previous findings related to the
importance of Plant Secondary Metabolites to pika foraging behavior, and helped guide
Page 11 of 62
my further research. Personal communications with Erik Beever, Ph.D., cited
extensively in this paper, provided valuable perspective that allowed me to recognize
the often variable and sometimes contradictory findings of many studies related to
climatic impacts on the pika across its range. Through synthesis and integration of the
secondary literature, I identify common themes and provide evidence to characterize
the relationship between pika foraging behavior, climate, and plant community
composition and structure.
Results
What plant characteristics are important to pikas, and how do they influence
behavior and survival?
Foraging Behavior
Unlike many montane mammals, the pika does not hibernate, and instead stores plants
in haypiles, upon which it feeds throughout the course of the winter. The American pika
is a generalist herbivore, capable of foraging upon a broad range of local vegetation
depending on relative availability and accessibility, but its complex foraging behavior
and phenology complicates its nutritional requirements. Despite being a dietary
generalist, the pika actively selects plants based on quality rather than prevalence or
abundance (Smith and Erb 2013). The pika largely relies upon metabolic water from
plants for hydration and preferentially collects and stores plants for winter based on
specific nutritional, chemical, and structural characteristics (Huntly et al. 1986, Dearing
1997), prompting some researchers to ironically label it a “selective generalist” (Kristina
Ernest, Ph.D., personal communication, February 7, 2017). Pikas have exceptionally
high metabolic demands, especially at high altitudes, and the availability of adequate
nutrients and water could limit fitness and survival (Sheafor 2003, Erb et al. 2014).
Selectivity is expected to be enhanced in areas of extreme seasonality and relatively
high ambient temperatures (Moyer Horner et al. 2016), such as the isolated mountain
ranges of the Great Basin. The availability of high quality forage, dependent upon local
Page 12 of 62
plant community composition and structure, may very well mediate pika persistence in
these harsh environments.
Grazing and haying behavior serve separate purposes for the pika, and limitations to
either behavior, either via environmental constraints or plant availability, have distinct
consequences on fitness. Grazing sustains continuous metabolic needs and daily
activity, while the sole purpose of haying is for winter survival and to ensure adequate
fitness for spring mating and reproduction (Huntly et al. 1987, Dearing 1997a).
Importantly pikas graze throughout the year but only hay during the summer and early
fall months, coinciding with peak vegetative biomass (Huntly et al. 1987). Therefore,
haying, and thus winter survival and spring fitness, is constrained by the timing and
duration of the growing season, as well as by extreme summer heat, which limits the
amount of time spent foraging each day (Stafl and O’Connor 2015). In addition, pikas
use different parts of plants when grazing versus haying and prefer to cache plants high
in secondary chemical compounds that help preserve them through the winter months
(Dearing 1997), making plant chemical composition especially important to haypile
production.
In agreement with Central Place Foraging Theory, which attempts to explain how an
organism maximizes foraging efficiency by balancing risks and costs with energy won,
pika foraging behavior is heavily influenced by predation risk and environmental
conditions, just as it is also influenced by selectivity for specific plant characteristics
(Huntly et al. 1985, 1986). Pika foraging is concentrated around the talus and decreases
with distance, while forage selectivity becomes more focused further away from the
talus, suggesting the influence of predation risk and energy budgeting (Huntly et al.
1987, Holmes 1991). Females venture further from the talus when lactating compared
to when pregnant, as their priorities shift from predator avoidance when carrying young
to maximization of food when nursing (Holmes et al. 1991). The phenological timing of
plant growth and the availability of high quality forage may be most important during
pregnancy when mothers cannot risk exposing themselves for extended durations.
Pikas are positively correlated with sites of high visibility for predator surveillance (i.e.,
Page 13 of 62
negative correlation between pika persistence and overall vegetation cover, foliar cover,
and relative tree cover), as vegetation structure can inhibit their ability to safely forage
(Wilkening 2007, Moyer-Horner et al. 2016). Human disturbance can also disrupt
foraging behavior, as pikas respond to hikers with antipredator behaviors by reducing
foraging time (Stafl and O’Connor 2015). Trail traffic could be especially deleterious to
pika winter survival and spring fitness during summer and early fall, when pikas are
actively collecting for their haypiles. Similarly, pikas reduce their foraging time at higher
ambient temperatures, which can be particularly limiting to vital summer haying
activities, especially as the climate continues to warm (Stafl and O’Connor 2015). Pika
foraging selectivity can be highly site-specific and variable in response to environmental
heterogeneity (Smith and Erb 2013). Understanding the external factors that influence
foraging behavior is essential to realistically characterize the relationship between plant
community composition and structure and pika persistence.
Considering the complexity of the pika’s foraging behavior and phenological
requirements, combined with the extreme seasonality and unforgiving conditions of the
pika’s high-elevation habitat, metrics of forage quality may be especially important in
buffering or facilitating environmental stressors, and could improve efforts to model pika
distribution and to identify important refugia. As central place foragers, pikas do not
venture far beyond the talus in search of food and are thus limited by the abundance,
variety, and quality of available local forage plants (Huntly et al. 1985, 1986). Forage
quality can be best quantified by considering the relative importance of 1) plant
nutritional components, 2) Plant Secondary Metabolites (PSM), and 3) plant
morphology.
Nutritional Components
Metabolic water content
The metabolic water content of local vegetation may be most important to pika
persistence at sites where climate is drier and warmer, especially at lower elevations
and during periods of drought. Smith and Erb (2013) demonstrated that, while selection
for plants with high water content negatively correlates with elevation (i.e., selectivity is
Page 14 of 62
higher at lower elevations) in the southern Rocky Mountains, the water content of
commonly available vegetation does not correlate across the same elevation gradient,
indicating that pikas do not select for water content based upon differences in available
forage but rather are likely responding to differences in climate and free water
availability at different elevations. One metric of water balance, annual
evapotranspiration, has been shown to be a strong predictor of pika persistence in the
Great Basin; however, it can be mediated by regional and local environmental variables,
such as temperature, water inputs (i.e., precipitation), and soil characteristics, which
makes its influence on vegetation quality and pika persistence difficult to interpret
(Beever et al. 2016a).
Protein and Nitrogen Content
Another important nutritional component of forage plants consumed by pikas can be
defined in terms of digestible protein or digestible nitrogen (Wickhem 2016). High
protein diets can increase reproduction rates and improve overall fitness in mammals
(Smith 1988). Similarly, diets high in digestible nitrogen can improve growth rates in
offspring and increase reproduction rates (DeGabriel et al. 2009). In order to quantify
the protein content of a plant, scientists often measure concentrations of leaf nitrogen,
which makes up amino acids, the building blocks of protein, and thus can serve as a
proxy for protein content (Wickhem 2016). However, tannins in consumed forage can
actually bind to protein and reduce its availability for digestion (Robbins et al. 1987).
This defense mechanism against herbivory by which tannins reduce the digestible
protein content in plants confounds the assessment of what constitutes ‘high quality’
forage for a species like the pika that actively selects for plants containing tannins in
order to help preserve its winter haypile.
Pikas have been shown to preferentially collect and store plant species with higher
crude protein content (Millar and Zwickel 1972). Considering nitrogen a metric of protein
content, and so of forage quality, Smith and Erb (2013) found that selectivity for nitrogen
increases for pika populations with low-quality vegetation and decreases for pika
populations with high quality vegetation, suggesting pikas balance the energetic costs of
Page 15 of 62
haying by increasing selectivity for higher-energy food when it is less available.
Similarly, pika selectivity for nitrogen increases at sites with higher average summer
temperatures, allowing the pika to reduce its exposure to heat stress by spending less
time foraging – focusing on quality over quantity for cached items. However, high-
nitrogen foods may be more important for the pika’s summer diet than for the winter
haypile, as more focus is given to secondary chemistry when selecting for the winter
diet (Dearing 1996).
Plant Secondary Metabolites
Due to the unique foraging behavior and dietary requirements of a non-hibernating
alpine mammal, the driver of the pika’s haypile preferences and selective caching may
be the most critical indicator of forage quality. Plant Secondary Metabolites (PSMs), a
key adaptation of many plants in defense against herbivory, which can produce
negative effects ranging from reduced digestibility of vital nutrients to toxicity, appear to
be a dominant driver of haypile selectivity in both the American pika and the Siberian
pika (Dearing 1996, 1997a, 1997b, Gliwicz et al. 2006). Though classifications vary, the
three major types of PSMs include alkaloids, terpenes, and phenolics. Strikingly, the
concentration of phenolics, the most common class of PSMs, found in all angiosperms
(Wickhem 2016), in cached plants is three to six times higher than that of plants
consumed during summer (Dearing 1996, 1997). Somewhat counterintuitively, pikas
actually prefer plants with high concentrations of PSMs for their haypiles, as they can
provide the dual advantage of preserving plant material through the winter and delaying
consumption until the compounds have degraded sufficiently to make the plant
palatable (Dearing 1997b). Phenolics and terpenes possess antifungal and antimicrobial
properties that resist decomposition (Dearing 1996). The preservative qualities of PSMs
help to maximize the biomass and nutritional content of the haypile during winter and
early spring when forage availability is highly limited, allowing for approximately 70 more
days of food than if it were comprised of plants typical of the summer diet (Dearing
1997b). By early spring, the concentration of secondary compounds in the haypile
becomes as low as in summer forage, just in time for the crucial period of mating and
reproduction when proper diet and fitness are essential. The unpalatability of tannins (a
Page 16 of 62
common form of phenolic) and their associated decreased digestibility of proteins and
carbohydrates is reduced by the drying of the plant material, and terpenes lose their
harmful volatiles following harvest, allowing pikas to utilize plant resources that were
previously unavailable for consumption (Gliwicz et al. 2006, Wickhem 2016). In fact,
pikas are able to monitor the concentration of secondary compounds in the vegetation,
testing the palatability of the plants until concentrations are acceptable for consumption
(Dearing 1997b). Rather than developing chemical-specific, physiological adaptations,
the generalist pika is able to overcome a variety of plant chemical defenses through
simple behavioral modifications (Dearing 1996). This preference for PSMs allows pikas
to circumvent extreme seasonal changes in forage availability and climate in their harsh,
high-elevation habitat, potentially indicating a significant link between metrics of forage
quality and persistence.
In a recent study, in which ten plant species commonly present in pika habitats were
offered to pikas through a series of cafeteria-style experiments, Wickhem (2016) found
alkaloid and tannin content to be the top drivers of pika foraging preference. Of the
plants tested, the top species included Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), Sitka alder
(Alnus viridis), willow (Salix spp.), and black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera
trichocarpa). Interestingly, pikas preferred plants with either high concentrations of
tannins or alkaloids, but not both, potentially in response to an interaction between the
two compounds (Figure 3). Protein and water content did not appear to be strong
drivers of pika foraging preference, further supporting the hypothesis that PSMs dictate
summer caching behavior and winter diet (Dearing 1997b). Incorporating a variety of
PSMs from different plant species may help prevent a single detoxification pathway
from becoming overloaded (Freeland and Janzen 1974). Understanding the relative
levels and combinations of PSMs present in a given plant community may help
characterize forage quality and inform restoration approaches.
Page 17 of 62
Figure 3. Pika foraging preference for tannins is negatively associated with alkaloid concentration,
suggesting pikas prefer one or the other secondary compound. (Wickhem 2016).
Plant Morphology and Structure
Plant morphology does correspond with pika foraging preferences, but morphological
bias is not consistent across the pika’s range and may not be as influential or useful of a
predictor as nutritional or secondary chemical content. According to Central Place
Foraging Theory, which highlights how organisms maximize foraging rates and
efficiency when venturing from a home base (e.g., talus patch), pikas should
preferentially collect larger plant species for their winter haypiles in order to reduce the
time and energy spent foraging. In Alberta, Millar and Zwickel (1972) concluded that
pikas preferentially harvest shrubs and clumped herbs in order to maximize the amount
of cached plant material for minimal effort. Similarly, Huntly et al. (1986) found that
pikas preferentially cache tall bunch grasses over shorter graminoids, forb flowering
stalks over forb leaves, and more woody plants compared to its summer grazing diet
(Huntly et al. 1986). However, both of these studies occurred before Dearing (1996) first
provided evidence of pika selectivity based on Plant Secondary Metabolites (PSMs),
and neither study considered the role of secondary chemistry in defining the observed
Page 18 of 62
foraging preferences. The generally higher concentrations of secondary compounds in
forbs and woody plants compared to graminoids could partly account for these
observed relationships. While mean forb height positively correlates with short-term pika
abundance (defined as the number of occupants per pika home range) in Glacier
National Park, this could just as well reflect local microclimate (i.e., mesic habitat) or
foraging patterns (i.e., late harvest of forbs in response to the extreme seasonality and
relatively high summer temperatures of the park) and may not represent convincing
evidence of forage quality (in this case, defined by plant morphology) driving pika
abundance (Moyer-Horner et al. 2016). Looking to other species of Ochotona fails to
offer any further clarity on the matter; collared pikas (Ochotona collaris) in the Yukon
Territory actively select plant species with larger leaf sizes for their haypiles (Hudson et
al. 2008), while the Siberian northern pika (Ochotona hyperborea) does not appear to
have a clear preference for certain plant morphologies (Gliwicz et al. 2006). Although
the size of plants and plant structures may contribute to pika forage selection, the
tendency of plant morphology to reflect other factors, from nutritional and chemical
components to environmental conditions and herbivory pressure, makes it unreliable at
best as a predictor of foraging preferences.
In addition to the forage implications of plant morphology, vegetation structure is an
important habitat characteristic that may influence foraging behavior and survival.
Dense canopy cover may obstruct visibility and impair the pika’s ability to surveil the
talus, a vital behavior by which pikas maintain their territories and avoid predators
(Tyser 1980, Wilkening 2007). Trees can serve as perches for avian predators, which
would enhance the threat of predation. The persistence of pygmy rabbit (Brachylagus
idahoensis) populations in the Great Basin has been negatively associated with pinyon
and juniper encroachment, as these trees gradually reduce the understory and provide
perches for predators (Larrucea 2007). The height of forbs, which has been positively
associated with pika abundance, can indicate shade for foraging pikas, reducing heat
stress and allowing for prolonged activity during the crucial haying period of summer
and early fall (Moyer-Horner et al. 2016). Further research on the influence of trees and
plant community structure on pika persistence via alteration of microclimate and
Page 19 of 62
predator dynamics is needed to clarify the importance of these predictors in the context
of other, potentially collinear, variables.
Place-based Foraging Behavior
Despite general patterns in dietary preferences, pika forage selection appears to be
highly site-dependent (Hudson et al. 2008). Microclimate and local plant phenology play
important roles in determining pika foraging behavior and preference. While selectivity
for high-nitrogen plants relates to both the availability of nitrogen within the local plant
community and abiotic environmental factors, the selectivity for water content appears
to be solely based upon abiotic environmental factors (Smith and Erb 2013). Pika
preference for specific plant nutritional qualities may be location-specific and
heterogeneous across its range, depending upon local plant community composition
and environmental conditions. Further, summer and winter dietary preferences can vary
between locations. While pikas avoid caching lichens and evergreen cushion plants,
such as mosses, they still frequently graze them during spring and presumably during
winter as a haypile-supplement (Millar and Zwickel 1972, Conner 1983, Gliwicz et al.
2006). In warmer, drier areas where haypiles are less advantageous, pikas take this a
step further and shift their diet to become much more reliant on cushion plants (Varner
and Dearing 2014). Even when experimentally presented with harvested cushion plants,
pikas still avoid incorporating them into haypiles, suggesting they do not avoid the
cushion plant because of the difficulty and high-energy cost of harvesting a matted plant
(Dearing 1996). Instead, pikas may instinctually avoid caching plants that are available
throughout winter and spring (Hudson et al. 2008). This careful budgeting of resources
based upon seasonal availability may be most beneficial in high-elevation, montane
habitats forage resources can be restricted by extreme seasonality (Gliwicz et al. 2006).
Local plant phenology in relation to seasonal microclimate may outweigh the importance
of plant secondary chemistry to pika persistence in some areas, and could be especially
important in mediating the effects of a changing climate.
Page 20 of 62
How do pikas alter their local plant community?
The interpretation of the seeming significance of plant community composition and
structure to pika persistence is complicated by the effects that the pika has on its local
plant community. In other words, does vegetation actually mediate pika persistence, or
does the pika mediate the plant community, giving rise to spurious correlations?
Pika foraging pressure can confound modeling efforts but does not contradict
importance of forage quality. Well understood mechanisms of foraging pressure,
including lessons offered by Central Place Foraging Theory, can be compared against
established vegetative predictors of pika occupancy and persistence in order to assess
the relative role that foraging behavior plays in creating these linkages. Central Place
Foraging Theory correctly predicts that an increasing gradient of plant abundance and
species richness follows a declining gradient of grazing pressure away from the home
base – in this case, the talus (Huntly et al. 1986) (Figure 4). Concentration of foraging
near the talus results in a local decline in biomass and plant species richness (Huntly
1985), which disagrees with the positive relationship between pika occupancy and
vegetation species richness (Varner et al. 2015), suggesting forage quality is a more
consequential predictor than foraging pressure. Similarly, while pika foraging selectivity
tends to cause an increase in plants of lower calorie and protein content (Huntly 1985),
pika occupation and persistence are positively associated with relative forb cover
compared to graminoids (Wilkening 2007, Erb et al. 2014, Ray et al. 2016), despite
forbs generally having higher energy and protein value than graminoids (Holechek
1984). Heightened selectivity in areas of extreme seasonality may cause pikas to graze
more graminoids and delay forb collection until late in the season, resulting in a greater
forb-to-graminoid ratio and taller forbs, both of which have been shown to be strong
predictors of pika occupancy and abundance (Moyer-Horner et al. 2016). A comparable
argument could be made regarding the negative relationship between pika persistence
and total vegetation cover, foliar cover, and relative tree cover (Wilkening 2007). Pika
foraging pressure can suppress vegetation and biomass (Huntly 1986), which could
explain the negative correlation. However, the pika’s tendency to remove, but not
Page 21 of 62
consume, obstructive vegetation in areas of dense cover (Markham and Whicker 1973)
– a behavior that has been shown to improve predator avoidance in other small
mammals (Hansen and Gold 1977) – suggests that the negative relationship between
canopy cover and pika presence may actually reflect a plant-to-pika effect rather than
the other way around. Gradated plant community transformations caused by intense
foraging pressure, as well as the pika’s ability to actively engineer its habitat to promote
its own survival, complicates efforts to model pika-vegetation relationships and must be
considered when developing hypotheses and evaluating results.
Figure 4. Change in vegetation cover and vegetation grazed by pikas in relation to distance from talus
patch. (Huntly et al. 1986)
How does climate (and climate change) influence pika persistence and alpine
plant communities?
What has (pre)history shown us?
The paleontological record indicates that the American pika has experienced significant
range expansions and contractions over previous millennia, largely in response to
Page 22 of 62
glacial and interglacial cycles. Near the end of the Pleistocene epoch (c. 12,000
radiocarbon years ago), pika populations existed at much lower elevations – about 1750
m on average – than at present and did not exclusively utilize talus habitat (Grayson
2006). The cooler conditions of the Pleistocene epoch facilitated gene flow between
different high elevation pika populations, promoting a regional genetic cohesion that still
characterizes pika lineages today (Galbreath et al. 2009). Since the last glacial
maximum of the late Wisconsinan (c. 40,000-10,000 radiocarbon years ago), the
average elevation of pika populations in the Great Basin has risen by 783 m (Figure 5),
and the distance between now-extirpated populations and currently extant populations
declined dramatically as the range contracted around the high elevation mountain
ranges that transect the xeric valleys (Grayson 2005) (Figure 6). Low-elevation
populations were extirpated from most of the Great Basin by or during the mid-
Holocene, a period marked a warm period known as the climatic optimum (Grayson
2000). Losses were most severe in the southern Great Basin and along the Utah-
Nevada border, where conditions became too hot and dry to support viable pika
populations (Grayson 2006). These rapid distributional shifts and extirpations in
response to Holocene warming have produced considerable demographic decline
across all five genetic lineages of pika (Figure 7) since the Last Glacial Maximum; the
potential for further demographic retraction, population fragmentation, and even lineage
extinction may threaten the pika’s ability to cope with continued warming (Galbreath et
al. 2009). Comparable demographic impacts caused by postglacial warming can
provide valuable insight into the trajectory of pika populations in the future, though the
unprecedented rate of contemporary climate change and associated range contraction
elicit considerable uncertainty and concern.
Page 23 of 62
Figure 5. Rise in elevation of pikas in the Great Basin since the late Wisconsinan. (Grayson 2005)
Figure 6. Extirpations and range retraction across the Great Basin since the late Winsconsinan. Closed
circles indicate prehistorically occupied (and now extirpated) sites. Open circles with crosses indicate
historically occupied (and now extirpated) sites. Open circles indicate currently extant sites. The gray
dotted line indicates the boundary of the hydrographic Great Basin. (Grayson 2005)
Page 24 of 62
Figure 7. Major mitochondrial DNA lineages of the American pika. The broken line represents the
approximate southern extent of the continental ice sheet during the LGM. The numbers indicate sampling
locations. (Galbreath et al. 2009)
Just as past climate change has shaped the pika’s current distribution, climate has also
shaped the evolution of plant communities and the pika’s dietary niche. The
evolutionary history of the pika family, Ochotonidae, and its current geographic range
has been closely tied to climate and associated shifts in dominant vegetation.
Ochotonids strongly prefer C3 plants, while many leporids (rabbits and hares) are able
to incorporate significant amounts of C4 plants into their diet (Ge et al. 2013). Plants
using the C4 metabolic pathway for carbon fixation attained their current dominant
status in the late Miocene to early Pliocene (4-8 million years ago), coinciding with a
decline in global ambient temperatures. C4 plants, most of which are monocots in the
Poaceae family, are largely fire adapted and characterized by a high carbon-to-nitrogen
ratio and low protein (Ge et al. 2012). This poorer nutritional quality, as well as the fact
that not all herbivores are equally capable to digest C4 plant material, resulted in large-
scale faunal shifts after the C4 expansion of the late Miocene (Osborne 2008). In
Page 25 of 62
parallel with the shift from C3 dominated plant communities to mixed C3 and C4, and
C4 dominated, drove large scale extinctions and range contractions of Ochotonids,
resulting in today’s single extant genus (Ochotona), which includes 28 species of pika
found in talus habitats of North America and Asia (Ge et al. 2013) (Figure 8). While the
current increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide is expected to promote primary
production and plant biomass, it may offer a competitive advantage to C3 plants over
C4 plants, with potentially positive implications for Ochotona spp.; however, the
relationship between carbon dioxide levels and C3 and C4 plant community dynamics is
exceptionally complex, and the associated consequences of future climate change are
still poorly understood (Wand et al. 1999). The pika’s current dietary niche does not
appear to have been altered by the last century of climate change, with the greatest
pattern of dietary variation occurring in individuals between seasons rather than in
populations across decades or latitudes (Westover 2017). The question that remains is
how plant communities will shift in response to contemporary climate change, and
whether pikas will have the capacity to adapt and evolve along with these vegetative
transformations.
Figure 8. Changes in climate and vegetation in relation to the number of ochotonid and leporid genera
from the Paleocene to the early Pleistocene. (Ge et al. 2013)
Impacts of Climate Change on Alpine Plant Communities
Alpine plant communities may be some of the most impacted by climate change, as
rising temperatures and increasing aridity across steep elevation gradients force
Page 26 of 62
species to either tolerate or avoid environmental stressors. The elevational distributions
of many plants species are rising dramatically in response to recent climate change
(Kelly and Goulden 2008). Alpine species face a greater risk of localized extinction, as
they have a narrower elevation tolerance than subalpine species and species with
ranges spanning lower elevations (Guisan and Theurillat 2000). Due to the conic shape
of mountains, habitat area becomes reduced as species migrate higher to cope with
shifting environmental conditions. Some high elevation plant communities in the western
U.S. have experienced significant compositional transformations, including more bare
ground and graminoids and shrubs, and fewer forbs (Zorio et al. 2016).
Forbs appear to be particularly vulnerable to climate change, and alpine plant
communities may see a trend towards more xeric shrubs, with unknown consequences
for the pika’s winter dietary requirements. Concerningly, climate change impacts on
water balance may mediate changes in vegetation more significantly than the direct
consequences of rising temperatures (Franklin et al. 2016). Based upon the severe,
long-term drought that occurred across the western United States in conjunction with
the Medieval Warm Period (900-1300 AD), the continued rise in temperatures can be
expected to trigger a shift towards extreme, long-term aridity in the region (Cook et al.
2004). Increased warming promotes aboveground biomass (AGB) production of shrubs
while reducing AGB of forbs in montane meadows, indicating a potential shift in
dominant vegetation of montane plant communities (Harte and Shaw 1995). Warming
may favor evergreen shrubs compared to deciduous forbs via changes in soil moisture
and inhibitions to the light-capturing protein complex, photosystem II (PSII) (Loik et al.
2000).
A reduction in forb biomass may negatively impact forage quality and availability for pika
haypiles. In addition, reduction in annual snowpack caused by global warming may
expose overwintering perennial forbs in montane meadows to more extreme cold,
potentially delaying bloom and decreasing seed production (Inouye and McGuire 1991).
Low population density and altered phenology of forbs might limit haypile production
and influence foraging behavior, forcing pikas to expose themselves to further heat
Page 27 of 62
stress and predation risk in order to cache sufficient plant material for winter. Though
forbs are frequently cited as significant predictors of pika persistence (Rodhouse et al.
2010, Moyer-Horner et al. 2016, Ray et al. 2016), some shrub species have also proven
beneficial (Ray et al. 2016). Improved understanding of the dietary preferences of pikas
at the plant species level, as well as how alpine plant communities transform in
response to climate change, will be necessary to inform long-term conservation
strategies.
Climatic Predictors of Extirpation Explored
The direct effects of specific climatic variables on pika distribution must be considered in
conjunction with the indirect effects mediated through vegetation so as to distinguish the
mechanisms of change and account for synergistic effects. In order to assess the full
impact of climate change on species distributions, scientists have largely focused on
investigating the realized niche of a species through the development of species
distribution models (SDMs) (Schwalm et al. 2016). SDMs seek to estimate potential
range shifts and the vulnerability of populations by assessing the relationship between
occupancy and a range of biotic and abiotic variables. When a model has a good fit
(i.e., the chosen predictor variables adequately explain the variation in the response
variable), it can then be extrapolated to evaluate future distributions and identify the key
limiting factors. The pika’s unique position as a model organism threatened by climate
has spurred research focusing on developing realistic SDMs based on climatic variables
in order to better understand how montane mammals react to environmental change.
Temperature
Given the pika’s physiological sensitivity to extreme heat, rising temperatures have
unsurprisingly been widely implicated in the observed collapse of pika populations
throughout much of the species’ range. Recent studies have focused on resurveying
historically occupied sites and comparing shifts in abundance, elevation, or evidence of
extirpation to climatic data, such as ambient vs. sub-talus temperatures (Beever et al.
2010, 2013, 2016a). Researchers can place thermal sensors below the talus and
compare temperature trends to ambient temperature derived from weather stations in
Page 28 of 62
order to hindcast temperatures and search for correlations between temperature and
patterns of persistence. Testing alternative models of climate-mediated extirpations in
the Great Basin, researchers found chronic heat stress and acute cold stress to be the
strongest predictors of pika persistence (Beever et al. 2010). Importantly, chronic heat
stress often appears to be more important than acute heat stress (Beever et al. 2013),
though this is not consistent across the pika’s range. While pikas may largely be able to
avoid acute heat stress through behavioral adaptations, such as seeking refuge under
the talus during the hottest part of the day, the sub-lethal impacts of chronic heat stress
on foraging behavior and fecundity may actually be the more important driver of
extirpation (Beever et al. 2010). Chronic heat stress may be more influenced by climate
change, given that minimum temperatures increased several times more than maximum
temperatures during the 20th century (Beever et al. 2011), a trend that may become
more critical as temperatures continue to rise.
Projections of further warming suggest a dramatic decline in habitat for the pika across
its range. While average global temperatures are predicted to increase by 2.4-6.4°C by
the year 2100, a 4°C increase is expected to reduce suitable habitat for the 31
traditional American pika subspecies (which, through genetic analyses, have now been
synonymized into five distinct lineages) by, on average, 73% across their range (Calkins
et al. 2012) (Figure 2). Further, a 7°C increase could cause 19 of the 31 pika
subspecies to lose more than 98% of their habitat. The consequences of high elevation
warming are not restricted to the pika, as a scenario of warming by 3°C could cause
more than 20% of high-elevation small mammals in the Great Basin to go extinct
(McDonald and Brown 1992).
Page 29 of 62
Figure 2. Reduction in pika habitat under different scenarios of warming. (Calkins et al. 2012)
Importantly, the impacts of temperature are not consistent across the pika’s range.
While average temperature has been strongly correlated with pika persistence in the
Great Basin and northern Utah, it was outperformed by habitat area as a predictor
variable in northeastern California, reflecting the heterogeneous and place-based
relative importance of different climatic impacts (Beever et al. 2016a). The presence of
pikas in atypically warm habitat, such as at Craters of the Moon National Monument
where maximum July temperatures regularly exceed the pika’s upper physiological
temperature threshold, further suggests that temperature is not consistently or definitely
the most important limiting factor at work across their range (Rodhouse et al. 2010). The
interactive effects of temperature with other environmental factors, as well as the pika’s
significant adaptive capacity, require a place-based perspective, despite the temptation
to charge temperature as the “smoking gun” driving extirpations.
Page 30 of 62
Snowpack
One of the most surprising relationships linking climate and pika persistence is that of
acute and chronic cold stress and snowpack. While most research has focused upon
the effects of rising temperatures in relation to the pika’s upper physiological tolerance
for heat, cold stress also appears to be a growing concern in relation to climate change.
Since pikas are so small (i.e., high surface-to-volume ratio leads to rapid loss of heat)
and do not hibernate (i.e., faster metabolism enhances heat loss), they rely on the
snowpack for insulation from the coldest winter temperatures (Beever et al. 2010). The
mountain snowpack has displayed a declining trend since the mid-20th century,
exposing pikas to increasingly extreme cold. Consistent exposure of pikas to lower
temperature thresholds (-5°C and -10°C), as well as to their upper physiological
thresholds, can strongly predict pika extirpation risk (Beever et al. 2011)
Possible ways in which snowpack, commonly measured as the snow-water equivalent
(SWE), or the theoretical depth of water if the snowpack was melted, may influence pika
persistence include: 1) mediating the number of days in which pikas are exposed to c
vhnb of insulation, and 2) controlling how far into the year that freshwater would be
available (Beever et al. 2013). Maximum SWE has been demonstrated as an excellent
indicator of pika density in contemporary surveys, with a strong link between number of
acutely cold days and pika extirpations. The synergistic relationship between SWE,
growing-season precipitation, and average temperature suggests potential indirect
mechanisms of climatic influence, reinforced by the strong correlation between relative
pika density and total aboveground gross annual productivity (Beever et al. 2013).
Hydrology
In combination with temperature, hydrologic variables – including metrics of
precipitation, evapotranspiration, humidity, and water balance – have been implicated
as determinants of pika persistence and extirpation across much of its range. In the
Southern Rocky Mountains, annual precipitation is an important limiting factor of pika
persistence, which contributed to the extirpation of several populations within the region
during the last few decades (Erb et al. 2011). Extirpations in this region, though
Page 31 of 62
relatively few compared to other parts of the pika’s range (e.g., the Great Basin), have
only been documented in areas that were consistently dry throughout the 20th century.
It can be difficult to confidently identify evidence of climate change impacts, particularly
for precipitation, which is far more variable and difficult to predict than temperature, but
the relationship between low precipitation and pika extirpations in this region helps to
inform future management through prioritization of conservation efforts in areas of
extended drought.
To evaluate the impacts of hydrology on pika persistence, it is important to consider
biologically relevant ‘ecohydrological variables,’ such as actual evapotranspiration,
SWE, growing-season precipitation, and climatic water-deficit. Together, these variables
reflect the climatic water balance in an ecologically relevant context. Drought results
from an imbalance between water inputs (measured as precipitation) and water demand
(measured as evapotranspiration, or the amount of water transpired through vegetation
and evaporated from the soil), and can stress pikas directly (i.e., via the lack of available
drinking water) or indirectly (i.e., via reduced primary productivity and available forage).
In fact, ecosystem productivity and plant population dynamics have been shown to be
highly sensitive to changes in water balance, and the impact of climate change on water
balance could be even more consequential for vegetation than the direct effects of rising
temperatures (Franklin et al. 2016). When assessing the impacts of water imbalance on
a system, it is important to distinguish between potential evavotranspiration (PE) and
actual evapotranspiration (AE); whereas PE represents the maximum amount of water
that could be evapotranspired given adequate water inputs and is used to represent the
water demand of a system, AE represents the actual amount of water transpired given
the limited inputs (NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information). Therefore,
AE is always equal to or less than PE, and can reflect the degree of water stress in a
system. In the Great Basin, annual evapotranspiration, calculated as the sum of the
monthly actual evapotranspiration, was found to be the strongest predictor of pika
occupancy in an assessment of multiple competing models based on a range of climatic
variables (Beever et al. 2016a). Annual actual evapotranspiration is regularly mediated
by precipitation, temperature, and soil moisture storage, and can offer a more realistic,
Page 32 of 62
ecologically meaningful measure of water balance than annual precipitation. Similarly,
maximum snow-water equivalent and average growing-season precipitation more
strongly predict pika population size than average annual precipitation, as they more
precisely influence water and forage availability in relation to the phenological patterns
of the pika (Beever et al. 2013). The relationship between water balance and pika
persistence and extirpation may be especially pronounced in the driest, hottest reaches
of the pika’s range and where severe droughts may occur.
Fire Regime
Given the evident relationship between pika occurrence and environmental variables
like heat, dryness, and plant community composition and structure, one might expect
fire disturbance to have huge consequences for pika survival and fecundity. While
limited research has been conducted to evaluate the potential impacts of increased fire
severity and frequency on montane mammals, Varner et al. (2015) had the unique
opportunity to study these impacts after their pika monitoring project at Mt. Hood was
interrupted by wildfire at the study location. Thermal sensors had been placed at the
talus surface and interstices in order to compare microclimate and thermoregulatory
behavior with other, already surveyed sites at nearby low elevations. One week after
placing the sensors, a nearby lightning strike ignited a wildfire that would burn 2430
hectares over the course of twenty-two days, impacting four of the nine previously
surveyed sites and two of the three new sites with thermal sensors. The researchers
seized this opportunity to analyze the data from the thermal sensors and conduct
subsequent survey monitoring of the locations in order to look for potential relationships
between pika occupancy and abundance and different metrics of fire severity. Resulting
statistical analyses demonstrated a surprisingly muted importance of the burn severity
indices in predicting pika density in the burned areas (Varner et al. 2015). On the
contrary, indices of vegetation and habitat structure strongly explained patterns of
density. The apparent quick recovery of vegetation at burned sites facilitated the
persistence and widespread distribution of pikas in the area. Moss, a component of the
highest-weighted model, can serve as a persistent and abundant food source for the
pika when other plants are limited, and can also allow pikas to avoid venturing out from
Page 33 of 62
the stable microclimate of the talus to forage. Thermal sensors placed within the talus
showed that the temperature in talus interstices never exceeded 19°C, demonstrating
the importance of talus as a thermal refuge for small animals during and after fire
disturbance (Varner et al. 2015). The resilience and behavioral adaptability displayed by
the pika, as well as the buffering capacity of an atypical forage source, in the face of fire
disturbance emphasizes the need for further, species-specific study of biotic response
to altered fire regimes.
Heterogeneity and Nuance of Climate Impacts
As evidence continues to accumulate associating rapid distributional losses of the pika,
including upslope retractions and local extirpations, with climate change, a unifying
theme has emerged in the scientific literature – that of the heterogeneity and nuance
with which climate acts upon a species’ range (Jeffress et al. 2013, Beever et al. 2016a,
Schwalm et al. 2016). The importance of different climatic variables in determining pika
persistence and extirpation is not consistent across the pika’s range. In some areas,
pikas appear to have a wider tolerance for climatic stress, and factors of habitat quality
seem to be the most important determinants of pika distribution. Rock-ice feature till
functions as an important landform refuge in warmer conditions of the southwestern
U.S., allowing pikas to tolerate a wider range of elevation, temperature, and average
precipitation conditions than expected (Millar and Westfall 2010). In fact, habitat
composition and connectivity can be even more important than climatic variables in
modeling pika occurrence (Schwalm et al. 2016). However, sites where pikas have
been extirpated do display significantly higher average maximum temperatures,
suggesting a potential limit to either the adaptive capacity of the species or to the
buffering capacity of certain habitat features.
The variability in importance of climate and other predictors of pika distribution can be
readily distinguished when comparing models across different regions of the pika’s
range. Under Island Biogeography Theory, the Sierra-Cascade extent of the pika’s
range in northeastern California could be considered a ‘mainland’ habitat, while the
isolated mountains of the Great Basin and nearby Zion National Park and Cedar Breaks
Page 34 of 62
National Monument in northern Utah represent ‘island’ habitat. Species richness in
‘island’ habitats, a subset of the species richness found in ‘mainland’ habitats, reflects
the balance between extinction and colonization rates, which in turn are mediated by
habitat area and magnitude of isolation (Beever et al. 2016a). Localized extinctions
should theoretically be more extensive in montane ‘island’ habitats due to the smaller
habitat area and population size (i.e., genetic pool), as well as the narrower elevation
gradients compared to the ‘mainland.’ As predicted by Island Biogeography Theory,
localized pika extirpations are far more severe in the Great Basin and northern Utah
compared to northeastern California (Beever et al. 2016a). Interestingly, metrics of
water balance and mean temperature strongly predict pika occupancy in the two ‘island’
regions, but habitat area outperforms these variables in the ‘mainland’ region, further
suggesting the reduced limitations imposed by climatic stressors in areas of substantial,
ecologically-connected habitat.
The heterogeneity and nuance of climate impacts can be distinguished by comparing
models at different scales, as well. At macroecological scales, impacts of climate on
pika distribution appear unequivocal (Beever et al. 2010, 2013, 2016a). At the local
level, however, pika occurrence varies widely across bioclimatic gradients (Jeffress et
al. 2013). Local-scale differences in the realized niche of the pika makes the relative
importance of various predictor variables highly heterogeneous across the species'
range; therefore, a place-based approach is important in modeling pika distribution and
density. In addition, the interactions between climatic variables can often mediate their
relative influence on pika populations. In a study of the impacts of a suite of climatic
factors on local patterns of pika distribution across bioclimatic gradients in eight U.S.
National Parks, precipitation alone was not found to be a strong predictor, but heat
stress performed better in the driest parks, suggesting an interaction between the
magnitude of temperature effects and position along precipitation gradients (Jeffress et
al 2013).
In addition to the spatial heterogeneity of climate’s importance, the primary drivers of
extirpations appear to be changing over time, with elevation best explaining historical
Page 35 of 62
extirpations and metrics of temperature best explaining recent extirpations in the Great
Basin (Beever et al. 2011). However, the magnitude and rate of contemporary climatic
changes do not appear to be significant drivers of extirpation compared to the long-
term, microclimatic conditions at extirpated sites (Erb et al. 2011). Though a clear signal
implicating rapid change as the cause of extirpation has not yet been identified, the
clear importance of microclimate (particularly temperature and water balance) suggests
limiting effects posed by future climate change.
Mechanisms of Climate-driven Extirpation
Despite mounting support for climate as a primary driver of recent distributional shifts of
the American pika, the precise mechanisms of fatality and extirpations are still poorly
understood, as well as how these mechanisms will respond to a changing climate.
Climate may impact pika persistence in a number of ways, including through
transformations of available forage, shifting timing of forage and water availability,
reduced ability to forage and reproduce due to chronic stress, and acute stress like
hyperthermia. However, food resource decline has been cited as the most common
mechanism through which contemporary climate change has caused extirpations (Cahill
et al. 2013). Adult survival rate of the collared pika (Ochotona collaris) in the Ruby
Range of western Canada has been positively linked to effects of the Pacific Decadal
Oscillation (PDO), which tends to result in below-average snowpack and earlier timing
of spring snowmelt in that region, suggesting the importance of plant phenology and
forage availability (Morrison and Hik 2007). An earlier and longer growing season would
allow more time to collect vegetation for haypiles and could lead to improved fitness
during the spring breeding season and the climatically stressful summer. Conversely, a
declining snowpack could result in advanced exposure to acute and chronic cold stress
during the winter, reducing survival rate (Beever et al. 2010, 2011). Climatic conditions
have also been linked to reproduction rates of O. princeps, as reproduction may be
significantly reduced during periods of extreme weather (Millar 1974). Pika foraging
behavior is closely mediated by temperature, as time spent foraging by O. princeps
decreases by 3% for ever 1°C increase in average daily temperature (Stafl and
O’Connor 2015). Potentially, rising temperatures could produce extirpations by limiting
Page 36 of 62
foraging and haying time, causing a reduction in fitness that might be exacerbated by
alternative mechanisms like cold stress. One might expect the benefits of an extended
growing season to be most offset by chronic heat and cold stress in trailing edges of the
pika’s range where conditions are most hot and arid, such as in the Great Basin.
Discussion
The relationship between climate, local plant community composition and structure, and
pika distribution is exceptionally complex and place-based, highlighting the
idiosyncrasies of alpine ecosystems. Climatic influence on pika persistence is
heterogenous across its range, though metrics of heat stress, cold stress, and water
budget appear to explain recent shifts in distribution (Jeffress et al. 2013, Beever et al.
2016a). Pika foraging behavior, as well as forage availability, are, in turn, influenced by
microclimate and cyclic weather patterns (Smith and Erb 2013, Gliwicz et al. 2006). The
accelerated warming and drying of the climate in western North America that is
expected to occur as a result of climate change may further stress pikas and limit the
quality of their diet (Beever et al. 2013, Stafl and O’Connor 2015), putting their
demonstrated adaptive capacity to the test. Further research into the direct and indirect
mechanisms by which climate induces fatality and extirpations is necessary to elucidate
the relative role of vegetation.
Climate and Forage Tightly Linked
In order to characterize the relationship between climate, vegetation, and pika
occurence, and to evaluate the significance of forage quality in predicting pika
persistence, I considered the three general explanations for apparent correlations
between various vegetative metrics and pika occurrence: 1) quality of available forage is
important for pika persistence, 2) pikas shape the composition and structure of the local
plant community and so the perceived relationship merely reflects correlation rather
than causation, and 3) microclimate is the true driver affecting pikas and plants
simultaneously (Wilkening et al. 2011, Ray et al. 2016). In regards to the second
Page 37 of 62
explanation, although pika foraging pressure can confound modeling efforts and should
be considered when interpreting results, it is likely not as significant as the effects of
climate or forage quality in determining persistence patterns. Positive associations with
forb cover and plant species richness (Wilkening 2007, Erb et al. 2014, Varner et al.
2015) contradict expectations that pika selective foraging would promote a less diverse
local plant community dominated by graminoids and plants of poor nutritional quality
(Huntly 1985). However, the pika’s dynamic dietary niche across seasons (Westover
2017) suggest that the complex relationship between microclimate, foraging behavior,
and forage availability – a combination of the first and third explanation – may, in fact,
have significant implications for pika persistence in the face of environmental change.
Conditional Importance of Plant Secondary Chemistry
Despite being generalist herbivores, pikas commonly exhibit selective foraging behavior
in order to capitalize on available plant resources and ensure fitness and survival. Pikas
select for Plant Secondary Metabolites (PSMs), nutritional composition (e.g., nitrogen
and digestible protein), water content, and structural characteristics that facilitate
efficient collection (Dearing 1997a, 1997b, Gliwicz et al. 2006). PSMs appear to be the
most important driver of winter diet composition, while nutritional composition is more
predictive of summer diet (Dearing o91996). Winter diet quality is highly important to
winter survival and to fitness for the spring breeding season, especially in high elevation
areas where seasonality is extreme (i.e., hot, dry summers and freezing winters), as
summer heat stress can limit vital caching time and harsh winters can limit forage
availability and cause cold stress (Wilkening 2011, Beever et al. 2016a). PSMs ensure
adequate food storage and allow pikas to utilize plant resources that would be otherwise
unavailable (Gliwicz et al. 2006, Wickhem 2016). However, this selectivity is largely
influenced by other environmental factors, including microclimate and local seasonality,
and can vary dramatically between regions and populations. Pikas display impressive
adaptive capacity, able to shift their diets to evergreen, persistent resources like moss in
order to tolerate atypical, low elevation habitats where haypiles are less essential and
summer heat is more limiting (Varner et al. 2016). Understanding the limits of pika
adaptive capacity may inform efforts to gauge pika response to future climate change.
Page 38 of 62
Interactive Effects of Climate on Forage Selectivity and Availability
Pikas become more selective and reliant on metrics of high quality forage (i.e., PSMs,
metabolic water content, and digestible protein) as an adaptive response to dynamic
climatic stressors; however, these same stressors threaten to transform alpine plant
communities, making them less appealing and beneficial to pikas. The importance of
forage quality is spatially variable relative to local forage availability and environmental
constraints on foraging behavior and fitness, adding a layer of complexity to the
heterogeneity of climatic limitations on pika distribution (Smith and Erb 2013). Pikas
prefer plants with high water content at low elevations where heat and aridity are more
limiting, just as temperature is a stronger predictor of pika occurrence when coupled
with aridity (Smith and Erb 2013, Jeffress et al. 2013). Concerningly, climate change is
expected to transform montane plant communities, resulting in drier, warmer, habitats
favoring xeric shrubs and grasses and discouraging PSM-rich forbs (Inouye and
McGuire 1991, Franklin et al. 2016). The interactive effects of climatic variables with
foraging preferences and dietary requirements constitute indirect mechanisms by which
climate may mediate pika persistence through a simultaneous increased demand and
reduced availability of high quality forage. Understanding the specific plant community
composition and structure that benefit pikas at the local level can help prioritize areas
for conservation and inform restoration efforts.
Lessons from an Indicator Species
As an indicator species, the pika offers valuable insight into the mechanisms of
biological response to climate change and reflects pervasive challenges faced by a
range of montane mammals. Marmots, large squirrels common at high elevations, face
similar threats from climate change, as water availability impacts survival and fecundity
and reduced snowpack induces further cold stress in the winter months (Armitage
2013). Just as tree cover negatively correlates with pika persistence, as it may reflect a
reduction in available understory forage and can limit their ability to surveil their territory
and avoid avian predators (Wilkening 2007), tree encroachment into subalpine meadow
habitat has been linked to population fragmentation in the Olympic marmot (Marmota
Page 39 of 62
Olympus) in Washington (Griffin et al. 2009). The upslope migration of trees and shrubs
associated with climate change is also reducing habitat for the Alaska marmot (Marmota
broweri) in Alaska’s Brooks Range (Gunderson et al. 2012). Similarly, juniper-pinyon
encroachment has contributed to extirpations of pygmy rabbits (Brachylagus
idahoensis) in Nevada and California (Larrucea 2007), just as juniper-pinyon percent
cover appears to be a significant predictor of pika absence in the Great Basin (see
Appendix). Mirroring the hardiness and complexity of pika response to atypical climatic
conditions, some populations of marmots appear to be better adapted to warmer
climates than others, though the rate of warming will likely outpace that adaptive
capacity; widespread extinction seems unlikely, but localized extirpations focused at low
elevation, marginal habitat are expected (Armitage 2013). Pikas exemplify the fragility
and limitations of high elevation ecosystems.
Despite the similar challenges, researchers must use caution when comparing the
pika’s response to climate with other montane species, as its unique life history and
behavioral plasticity may limit its applicability. Montane mammals employ different
strategies to respond to the challenges posed by the dynamic seasonality and harsh
winters of mountain ecosystems, each with their own unique obstacles posed by climate
change. While pikas cache haypiles for the winter, a behavior that is limited by high
summer temperatures and shifting plant communities (Smith and Erb 2013, Stafl and
O’Connor 2015), marmots and other mountain squirrels hibernate to endure the low
temperatures and limited plant availability of winter. Marmots are emerging from
hibernation earlier in response to warmer spring temperatures, out of sync with the
timing of snowmelt and the growing season, with potential impacts on their fitness and
survival (Inouye et al. 2000). In this case, the timing of warming may be more important
than the warming itself, as hibernating animals depend upon environmental cues to
maximize the efficiency of their adaptive response. When considering mutual climatic
stressors facing different montane species, it is important to understand the unique
limiting factors associated with their life histories and evolutionary strategies.
Page 40 of 62
Management Recommendations
Developing a conservation strategy for an indicator species at the frontier of climate
change impacts offers both a novel challenge and a significant learning opportunity. The
main question, though, is how we protect a species whose primary threat is climate
change – a global phenomenon that cannot be directly or significantly mediated by local
or regional management actions. Most likely, the answer is an integrated approach
informed by a place-based, comprehensive understanding of the pika’s life history and
foraging behavior as it relates to changes in local climate. First, we must prioritize
conservation efforts by identifying genetically significant populations, high-quality sites
that could function as habitat refugia, and areas of vital habitat connectivity to allow for
adequate gene flow and population stability. Species Distribution Models (SDMs) can
tell us where pikas are the most vulnerable to shifts in temperature or water availability.
Field surveys and remote sensing can be used to characterize habitat quality and
assess plant community composition and structure. Though little can be done to combat
the source of the issue (i.e., temperature stress, altered hydrologic regimes, etc.), there
are some opportunities to address the mechanisms and mitigate the ecological impacts.
Habitat Restoration and Enhancement
Understanding the vegetation types and characteristics that have either promoted or
limited pika persistence can inform restoration decisions and buffer future climate
stressors. Land managers could potentially install plants high in PSMs, particularly in
areas where seasonality is extreme. Plants with high metabolic water content might be
selected for low-elevation sites where moisture is limiting, and plants with significant
nutritional components (e.g., digestible protein, nitrogen) may be added at locations
where the nutritional quality of available forage is poor. Habitat restoration, including the
installation of preferred plant species and beneficial habitat features (e.g., fallen logs),
can be used to support vulnerable populations and establish habitat connectivity and
wildlife corridors. Habitat features relevant to pika dispersal and recolonization are
currently being tested along Interstate-90 in the Cascade Range of Washington
(Personal communication). Areas seeing rapid successional changes in plant
Page 41 of 62
community, such as through juniper-pinyon encroachment or the replacement of alpine
meadows or aspen woodlands with conifer forests, should be prioritized for monitoring
and potential restoration, as these changes may reflect a reduction in forage diversity
and quality or a shift in microclimatic conditions. Restoration of alpine meadows and
other high elevation plant communities can benefit a range of species beyond the pika,
including birds and other montane mammals.
Researchers are now considering novel experiments to test restoration methods and to
evaluate limiting factors. Hamster bottles are being places among the talus in order to
bolster stressed populations, which will be followed by careful monitoring to assess the
importance of water availability as a limiting factor (Personal communication).
Additionally, targeted plantings of shrubs like fernbush that have been shown to
positively correlate with pika persistence (Ray et al. 2016) are being pursued. Field trials
like these are necessary to provide ground-truthed data that validates models and
informs conservation strategies.
Legal and Regulatory Actions
Conservation strategies can also involve legal action and regulation. Simple
management decisions like placing trail restrictions in areas where vulnerable pika
populations are known to exist, as heavy trail traffic may disrupt foraging behavior (Stafl
and O’Connor 2015). On the larger scale, the Endangered Species Act (ESA) may be
utilized as a tool to protect the pika. This could prevent further habitat degradation or
fragmentation, and allocate resources and attention to restoring populations. However,
federal and even state listing is a highly contentious decision, as protections to such a
widely distributed species could create significant restrictions on activities like mining,
timber production, and watershed management. Due to the isolation and inaccessibility
of mountain areas, the listing of the pika does not pose many of the same problems
presented by other species at lower elevation where urban development and agriculture
can be interrupted; however, mountain ecosystems are hotspots for recreation, and
activities like skiing, snowboarding, camping, hiking, and tourism could be inhibited.
One important question is whether the natural resource agencies (e.g., U.S. Forest
Page 42 of 62
Service, Bureau of Land Management) will take the lead in pursuing further, objective
research to determine whether listing is necessary, despite these potential challenges
and disputes. Legal protections for the pika may very well begin at the local level with
Ecologically Significant Unit designations and state agency regulations. Although efforts
to list the pika under the ESA have been deterred twice in the last decade (2010 and
2016 due to lack of evidence, the rapidly growing body of research may soon facilitate
legal action. Whether or not the species and habitat protections afforded by the ESA
can adequately balance climate impacts in the face of the infamous bureaucracy and
limitations associated with the contentious rule remains unknown.
Adaptive Capacity as a Conservation Metric
Natural resource managers can enhance their ability to address the issues of
biodiversity loss and reduced ecosystem services related to the ecological impacts of
climate change by considering species’ adaptive capacity (AC) when developing
conservation strategies. Reflecting the ability of a species to tolerate stress (such as
climate change), AC corresponds with phenotypic plasticity, genetic diversity, and
dispersal ability, and is not to be confused with a species’ sensitivity to stress. However,
a firm distinction must be made between fundamental AC and realized AC (Beever et al.
2016b). Realized AC is the actual expression of AC after accounting for the limitations
of extrinsic factors, such as land use and land cover, pollution, interspecific competition,
and habitat loss or fragmentation. For example, the fundamental ability of pikas to shift
their diet to a more readily available and persistent food source like moss could be
hampered by anthropogenic disturbance that alters moss cover in the landscape
(Beever et al. 2016b). Furthermore, dietary plasticity can only go as far as the
availability of adequate vegetation. Conservation strategies can work to reduce the
vulnerability of the target species, such as the pika, by taking measures that either
improve the expression of the fundamental AC or reduce extrinsic constraints limiting
that expression.
Page 43 of 62
Appendix:
Preliminary Vegetation Data Analyses
for the Great Basin
Page 44 of 62
Background
Objective
The results of my secondary research presented in the main portion of this paper
suggest that the quality and availability of forage, including its interactions with climate,
may influence the persistence or extirpation of pika populations. A diverse understory of
forbs and other plants high in secondary metabolites and nutritional components may
promote pika persistence, while extensive tree cover and graminoid-dominated plant
communities may drive extirpation, especially in areas of extreme seasonality where
warm, dry summers may limit foraging time and where winter haypiles are essential to
survival and fitness. However, these relationships are highly location-specific and vary
across the pika’s range.
In order to test the conclusions generated by my secondary research and to shed light
on the role of vegetation in the Great Basin – the part of the pika’s range most heavily
affected by recent extirpations (Beever et al. 2016a) – I utilized statistical methods to
test various plant species and types as predictors of pika presence. Specifically, I am
interested in finding if any of the vegetative variables in question can serve as
significant predictors of pika occurrence in the Great Basin, which may help further
characterize the ultimate drivers of pika persistence and extirpation. An information-
theoretic framework was employed to assess multiple competing hypotheses based on
a model set constructed a priori. These preliminary analyses help demonstrate what can
be learned from statistical exploration and modeling of data collected in the field, and
also lay the foundation for a forthcoming, more robust investigation.
Hypotheses Development
For my preliminary occupancy analyses, I chose to investigate the following predictors
(independently and in combination), measured as continuous variables (percent cover):
- Juniper (Juniperus spp.)
- Single-leaf pinyon (Pinus monophyla)
Page 45 of 62
- Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum)
- Aspen (Populus tremuloides)
- Fernbush (Chamaebatiaria millefolium)
- Oceanspray (Holodiscus discolor)
- Forb total (sum of percent cover for all forb species)
Juniper and pinyon encroachment has been identified as one of the most significant
determinants of pygmy rabbit (another lagomorph found at mid-to-high elevations)
extirpation in the Great Basin (Larrucea 2007). Fire suppression and other land-use
changes have allowed juniper-pinyon woodland communities to expand into sagebrush
and grass-dominated plant communities, increasing their distribution approximately 2.5
times over the last 150 years, and resulting in a rapid, drastic reduction in understory
vegetation and habitat. Pollen records suggest that a dramatic decline in pygmy rabbits
during the mid-Holocene correspond with an expansion of juniper-pinyon woodlands
(Grayson 2006). Similarly, cheatgrass, an invasive grass that has ravaged native
grasslands across the Great Basin, has been negatively associated with pygmy rabbit
presence (Larrucea 2007), and may result in a reduction in forage quality and diversity
for pikas. In addition to altering fire regimes and disturbing plant community
successional dynamics, cheatgrass, in its later phenological stages, is difficult to digest
and offers little in nutritional value to foraging pikas (Beever et al. 2008). Representing a
sort of inverse of juniper-pinyon woodlands, aspen woodlands, which are negatively
associated with juniper-pinyon woodlands and have seen dramatic reductions across
the western U.S. over the past century, provide a complex understory and vital habitat
for an array of birds and mammals (Wall et al. 2006, Stam et al. 2008), potentially
offering high quality forage and habitat for pikas, as well. Fernbush is being considered
as a potential predictor of pika occupancy because it was recently implicated as a
significant predictor of distribution at an interior range margin, Lava Beds National
Monument (Ray et al. 2016). Anecdotal evidence has suggested oceanspray as another
shrub that potentially serves as an important source of high-quality forage for pikas
(Personal communication). Finally, forb total – the summed percent cover of all forb
species present – is included as a potential predictor, since forb cover and species
Page 46 of 62
richness has been demonstrated as a significant predictor of pika occupancy and
density in a variety of recent studies across the pika’s range (Rodhouse et al. 2010, Erb
et al. 2014, Ray et al. 2016).
I hypothesize that juniper, pinyon, and cheatgrass will negatively predict pika occupancy
(or positively predict pika absence), and that aspen, fernbush, oceanspray, and forb
total will positively predict pika occupancy (or negatively predict pika absence).
Following my preliminary findings, I plan to incorporate more community-level
hypotheses (e.g., relative tree/shrub and forb/graminoid cover) in later analyses.
Methods
Dataset
The dataset, covering transect data from hundreds of locations in the Great Basin
across twelve years, was imported into R as a CSV file. Occupancy, a binary variable
(0=absent, 1=present), was defined as any talus patch where unequivocal evidence of
pika presence was found, including actually seeing pika individuals, hearing pika calls,
and locating fresh haypiles. Old haypiles (i.e., desiccated or degraded haypile that has
clearly been abandoned) were recorded in the dataset but insufficient for classification
of a patch as occupied. Percent cover was recorded for the five plant species with the
greatest cover value along the transects, assessed using ocular cover estimations. As a
potential source of error, this methodology may underestimate the importance of some
plant species that are not as abundant but function as preferred, high quality sources of
nutrition, metabolic water, or PSMs. Additionally, percent cover was recorded as zero if
the plant was not included in the five species, even though it may still have been
present at low density.
Statistical Analyses
The R Console was used to conduct a series of logistic regressions, with pika
occupancy as the dependent (response) variable and percent cover as the independent
(predictor) variables. In order to test the normality of the distribution of the predictor
Page 47 of 62
variables, I constructed histograms of each. Due to the size of the dataset and the
number of zero values present for percent cover, each of the predictor variables were
left skewed and needed to be log-transformed to correct this. Next, I ran correlation
functions between each of the predictor variables to determine if any were covariates of
each other, in which case they should not be included in the same model. Since none of
the predictors were significantly correlated with each other, I was able to proceed with
running my model sets. I ran generalized linear model (glm) functions on my predictors
and called summaries of the resulting models, which gave me the Akaike’s Information
Criterion (AIC) value for each. Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) is a metric for
comparing model fit between a set of models constructed a priori. Lower AIC values
indicate better fit, and models with differences in AIC values (ΔAIC) great than two are
considered significantly different in fit (Burnham and Anderson 2002).
Results
The most predictive model of the set includes the additive variables of juniper, pinyon,
and cheatgrass (Table 1). Juniper and/or pinyon show up in each of the best fitting
models. The null model features the highest AIC score and so the poorest fit, followed
by forb total). Juniper, pinyon, cheatgrass, and forb total each display negative
relationships with pika occupancy in their respective models, while aspen, fernbush, and
oceanspray each display positive relationships. The strongest models are composed of
negative predictors, while the weakest models feature positive predictors with the
exception of the weakest model (exluding the null model), forb total. AIC values range
from 1624.4 (strongest model) to 1727.6 (null model), and ΔAIC values range from 0 to
103.2. The two strongest models are the combinations with the most predictors (3
independent variables and 1 response), and thus the least parsimony.
Table 1. Relative support for selected models of pika occupancy in the hydrogeographic Great Basin. K
indicated the number of fitted parameters. Models are ranked in order of increasing AIC value (lower
value indicated better fit). ΔAIC indicated the difference between the AIC value of the indicated model
(AICi) and the model with lowest AIC value (AIC0).
Page 48 of 62
Model: Predictor (effect sign) K AIC ΔAIC
Juniper (-), Pinyon (-), Cheatgrass (-) 4 1624.4 0
Juniper (-), Pinyon (-), Forb Total (-) 4 1636 11.6
Juniper (-), Pinyon (-) 3 1638 13.6
Pinyon (-) 2 1655 30.6
Juniper (-) 2 1695.8 71.4
Cheatgrass (-), Forb Total (-) 3 1707.1 82.7
Cheatgrass (-) 2 1709.3 84.9
Fernbush (+) 2 1711.9 87.5
Aspen (+), Forb Total (+) 3 1717.2 92.8
Aspen (+) 2 1718.4 94
Oceanspray (+) 2 1722.1 97.7
Forb Total (-) 2 1726.2 101.8
Null (Intercept-only) 1 1727.6 103.2
Discussion
Juniper and pinyon appear to be significant predictors of pika absence in the
hyrdrogeographic Great Basin (Figure1). Although the precise mechanisms are unclear,
the supplemental effect of cheatgrass in the strongest model may indicate that
successional shifts in plant community composition and structure, and resulting decline
in forage quality, may be a driver. These negative variables exhibit the strongest
predictive power of the model set, potentially suggesting that loss of adequate forage or
habitat is a more important driver of extirpation than high quality forage is of
persistence. However, since juniper, pinyon, and cheatgrass are each associated with
xeric conditions, the negative relationship between these plant species and pika
occupancy may simply reflect the negative effects of warmer, drier microclimates.
Further analyses of how juniper-pinyon and cheatgrass have changed at each site over
time in relation to changes in pika density could offer insight into how these plant
community shifts affect pika populations.
Page 49 of 62
Figure 1. Plots of pika occupancy versus total percent cover of juniper and pinyon. On the y-axis, 1
indicates occupied talus patches (presence) and 0 indicates unoccupied patches (absence).
Surprisingly, total forb cover did not offer a significantly better fit compared to the null
model and actually exhibited a weakly negative relationship with pika occupancy.
Metrics of forb cover have received strong support as determinants of pika distribution
in the Great Basin and elsewhere, potentially due to their relatively high nutritional
content and prevalence of PSMs, as well as a reflection of a more favorable, mesic
microclimate (Wilkening 2007, Rodhouse et al. 2010, Erb et al. 2014, Ray et al. 2016).
Part of my hypothesis for why juniper-pinyon encroachment might negatively impact
pikas – the reduction in understory and forage quality – is at odds with the lack of
support for forbs as a predictor of pika occupancy. Inserting total forb cover as an
additional predictor to models featuring juniper and pinyon did not contribute
significantly to model fit, nor did it strengthen models of cheatgrass or aspen. Perhaps
total forb cover is not as essential as the cover of particular, preferred forb species.
Further analysis at a finer taxonomic resolution, exploring particular forb species based
on common haypile components at the sites, might better represent the influence of forb
cover as a predictor. Forb diversity would be another interesting metric to explore, but
the transect methodology, which only recorded the five most pervasive species, does
Page 50 of 62
not lend itself to species richness estimates, since species found at lower densities
would not be represented.
Puzzlingly, parsimony does not seem to matter much for my model set. While AIC is
meant to favor models balancing the number of variables with goodness of fit (i.e., more
variables only strengthen the explanatory power of the model up to a certain point
before it becomes profligate), higher K values consistently equate to greater fit in each
case (Table 1), as well as in other tested combinations not shown. Further examination
of the plots of occupancy against each variable and combination may help explain
patterns of model ranking. Additionally, calculations of the AICc values (AIC corrected
for small sample size) and Akaike weights for the different variables and models may
provide more accurate estimates of model fit and prediction strength.
These results represent preliminary findings that will precede a more robust exploration
and analysis of this dataset, with the intention of eventual publication in the peer-
reviewed literature. Subsequent analyses will cover a range of levels, comparing
averages across different sites (defined as all talus patches within a 3 km radius of a
historical pika record) in the Great Basin, as well as comparing individual occupied and
unoccupied patches within sites. These analyses will consider issues of persistence
rather than just occupancy in order to potentially identify relationships between changes
in occupancy or population density and shifts in plant community composition at the
locations across the twelve years of monitoring. Population density will be approximated
using estimated number of individual pikas present and corresponding number of
transects conducted, which will offer a higher-resolution perspective on population
dynamics and mechanisms of extirpation. The preliminary analyses have facilitated my
exploration of the dataset and provided a baseline upon which to base further
investigation; however, the results of the final analyses should be more credible and
interpretable in order to pass peer review and to justify publication.
Page 51 of 62
Acknowledgements
John Callaway, Ph.D., Professor and Graduate Program Director for M.S. in
Environmental Management at the University of San Francisco, served as my advisor
for this project and offered countless hours of assistance and invaluable feedback on
my paper as it was being developed. I received guidance from Erik Beever, Ph.D.,
Research Ecologist with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), and Jennifer Wilkening,
Ph.D., Wildlife Biologist and Habitat Conservation Plan Coordinator with the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (USFWS), both of whom are experts in the field of pika ecology and
have published relevant articles in peer-reviewed journals, many of which are cited in
this paper, and were able to direct me to many other pertinent studies. Dr. Beever
provided the data and R script used in my data analyses in the appendix, and Dr.
Wilkening advised me on the statistical implementation procedures. Finally, Amalia
Kokkinaki, Ph.D., Assistant Professor at the University of San Francisco, worked with
me to prepare my data and to develop my approach for the statistical analyses.
Page 52 of 62
Literature Cited
Beever, E.A., Wilkening, J.L., McIvor, D.E., Weber, S.S., Brussard, P.F., 2008.
American pikas (Ochotona princeps) in northwestern Nevada: A newly discovered
population at a low-elevation site. West. North Am. Nat. 68, 8–14.
doi:10.3398/1527-0904(2008)68[8:APOPIN]2.0.CO;2
Beever, E. A, Ray, C., Mote, P.W., Wilkening, J.L., 2010. Testing alternative models of
climate-mediated extirpation. Ecol. Appl. 20, 164–178. doi:10.1890/08-1011.1
Beever, E.A., Ray, C., Wilkening, J.L., Brussard, P.F., Mote, P.W., 2011. Contemporary
climate change alters the pace and drivers of extinction. Glob. Chang. Biol. 17,
2054–2070. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02389.x
Beever, E.A., Dobrowski, S.Z., Long, J., Mynsberge, A.R., Piekielek, N.B., 2013.
Understanding relationships among abundance, extirpation, and climate at
ecoregional scales. Ecology 94, 1563–1571. doi:10.1890/12-2174.1
Beever, E.A., 2016. Understanding the heterogeneity and nuance with which climate
change is acting on mountain ecosystems: insights from 1994-2016 research.
USGS-Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center. Dept. of Ecology, Montana State
Univ.
Beever, E.A., Perrine, J.D., Rickman, T., Flores, M., Clark, J.P., Waters, C., Weber,
S.S., Yardley, B., Thoma, D., Chesley-Preston, T., Goehring, K.E., Magnuson, M.,
Nordensten, N., Nelson, M., Collins, G.H., 2016a. Pika (Ochotona princeps) losses
from two isolated regions reflect temperature and water balance, but reflect habitat
area in a mainland region. J. Mammal. 97, 1495-1511.
doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyw128
Page 53 of 62
Beever, E.A., O’Leary, J., Mengelt, C., West, J.M., Julius, S., Green, N., Magness, D.,
Petes, L., Stein, B., Nicotra, A.B., Hellmann, J.J., Robertson, A.L., Staudinger,
M.D., Rosenberg, A.A., Babij, E., Brennan, J., Schuurman, G.W., Hofmann, G.E.,
2016b. Improving conservation outcomes with a new paradigm for understanding
species’ fundamental and realized adaptive capacity. Conserv. Lett. 9, 131–137.
doi:10.1111/conl.12190
Bennie, J.J., Duffy, J.P., Inger, R., Gaston, K.J., 2014. Biogeography of time partitioning
in mammals. PNAS 111, 13727–32. doi:10.1073/pnas.1216063110
Burnham, K. P. and Anderson, D.R.., 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a
practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edition. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R., Huyvaert, K.P., 2011. AIC model selection and
multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: Some background, observations, and
comparisons. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65, 23–35. doi:10.1007/s00265-010-1029-6
Cahill, A.E., Aiello-lammens, M.E., Fisher-Reid, M.C., Hua, X., Karanewsky, C.J., Ryu,
H.Y., Sbeglia, G.C., Spagnolo, F., Waldron, J.B., Warsi, O., John, J., Yeong Ryu,
H., Sbeglia, G.C., Spagnolo, F., Waldron, J.B., Warsi, O., Wiens, J.J., 2012. How
does climate change cause extinction? Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 280, 1890–1890.
doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.1890
Calkins, M.T., Beever, E.A., Boykin, K.G., Frey, J.K., Andersen, M.C., 2012. Not-so-
splendid isolation: Modeling climate-mediated range collapse of a montane
mammal Ochotona princeps across numerous ecoregions. Ecography (Cop.). 35,
780–791. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.07227.x
Castillo, J.A., Epps, C.W., Davis, A.R., Cushman, S.A., 2014. Landscape effects on
gene flow for a climate-sensitive montane species, the American pika. Mol. Ecol.
23, 843–856. doi:10.1111/mec.12650
Page 54 of 62
Chamberlin, T.C., 1965. The method of multiple working hypotheses. Science 15, 92–
96. doi:10.1086/629752
Conner, D.A., 1983. Seasonal changes in activity patterns and the adaptive value of
haying in pikas (Ochotona princeps). Canadian Journal of Zoology 61, 411–416.
doi:10.1139/z83-054
Cook, E.R., 2004. Long-term aridity changes in the Western United States. Science
306, 1015–1018. doi:10.1126/science.1102586
Crimmins, S.M., Dobrowski, S.Z., Greenberg, J.A., Abatzoglou, J.T., Mynsberge, A.R.,
2011. Changes in climatic water balance drive downhill shifts in plant species’
optimum elevations. Science 331, 324–327. doi:10.1126/science.1199040
Dearing, M.D., 1996. Disparate determinants of summer and winter diet selection of a
generalist herbivore, Ochotona princeps. Oecologia 108, 467–478.
doi:10.1007/bf00333723
Dearing, M.D., 1997a. The function of haypiles of pikas (Ochotona princeps). J.
Mammal. 78, 1156-1163. doi:10.2307/1383058
Dearing, M.D., 1997b. The manipulation of plant toxins by a food-hoarding herbivore,
Ochotona princeps. Ecol. 78, 774-781. doi:10.2307/2266057
DeGabriel, J.L., Moore, B.D., Foley, W.J., Johnson, C.N., 2009. The effects of plant
defensive chemistry on nutrient availability predict reproductive success in a
mammal. Ecol. 90, 711-719.
Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service (US FWS), 2010. Endangered and
Threatened Wildlife and Plants, 12-month Finding on a Petition to List the American
Page 55 of 62
Pika as Threatened or Endangered, Proposed Rule. Federal Register 75, 26. 50
CFR Part 17
Erb, L.P., Ray, C., Guralnick, R., 2011. On the generality of a climate-mediated shift in
the distribution of the American pika (Ochotona princeps). Ecology 92, 1730–1735.
doi:10.1890/11-0175.1
Ernest, K.A., 2016. Increasing pika connectivity across an interstate highway in the
Washington Cascades: update of early post-construction monitoring. North
American Pika Consortium.
Franklin, J., Serra-Diaz, J.M., Syphard, A.D., Regan, H.M., Asner, G.P., Turner, M.G.,
Vitousek, P.M., 2016. Global change and terrestrial plant community dynamics.
PNAS 113, 3725-3734. doi:10.1073/pnas.1519911113
Freeland, W.J., Janzen, D.H., 1974. Strategies in herbivory by mammals: the role of
plant secondary compounds. The American Naturalist 108, 269–289.
doi:10.1086/282907
Galbreath, K.E., Hafner, D.J., Zamudio, K.R., 2009. When cold is better: Climate-driven
elevation shifts yield complex patterns of diversification and demography in an
alpine specialist (American pika, Ochotona Princeps). Evolution 63, 2848–2863.
doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00803.x
Ge, D., Zhang, Z., Xia, L., Zhang, Q., Ma, Y., Yang, Q., 2012. Did the expansion of C4
plants drive extinction and massive range contraction of micromammals?
Inferences from food preference and historical biogeography of pikas.
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 326-328, 160–171.
doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2012.02.016
Page 56 of 62
Ge, D., Wen, Z., Xia, L., Zhang, Z., Erbajeva, M., Huang, C., Yang, Q., 2013.
Evolutionary history of lagomorphs in response to global environmental change.
PLoS One 8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059668
Grayson, D.K., 2000. Mammalian responses to Middle Holocene climatic change in the
Great Basin of the western United States. Journal of Biogeography 27, 181–192.
doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00383.x
Grayson, D.K., 2005. A brief history of Great Basin pikas. Journal of Biogeography 32,
2103–2111. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01341.x
Grayson, D.K., 2006. The Late Quaternary biogeographic histories of some Great Basin
mammals (western USA). Quaternary Science Reviews 25, 2964–2991.
doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2006.03.004
Guisan, A, and Theurillat, J., 2000. Assessing alpine plant vulnerability to climate
change: a modeling perspective. Integrated Assessment 1, 207-320.
Hansen, R.M., Gold, I.K., 1977. Blacktail prairie dogs, desert cottontails and cattle
trophic relations on shortgrass range. Journal of Range Management 30, 210.
doi:10.2307/3897472
Harte, J., Shaw, R., 1995. Shifting dominance within a montane vegetation community:
results of a climate-warming experiment. Science 267, 876–880.
doi:10.1126/science.267.5199.876
Holechek, J.L., 1984. Comparative contribution of grasses, forbs, and shrubs to the
nutrition of range ungulates. Rangelands 6, 261–263.
Page 57 of 62
Holmes, W.G., 1991. Predator risk affects foraging behaviour of pikas: observational
and experimental evidence. Anim. Behav. 42, 111–119. doi:10.1016/S0003-
3472(05)80611-6
Hudson, J.M.G., Morrison, S.F., Hik, D.S., 2008. Effects of leaf size on forage selection
by collared pikas, Ochotona collaris. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 40,
481–486. doi:10.1657/1523-0430(07-069)[hudson]2.0.co;2
Huntly, N.J., Smith, A.T., Ivins, B.L., 1986. Foraging behavior of the pika (Ochotona
princeps), with comparisons of grazing versus haying. J. Mammal. 67, 139–148.
doi:10.2307/1381010
Inouye, D.W., Mcguire, A.D., 1991. Effects of snowpack on timing and abundance of
flowering in Delphinium nelsonii (Ranunculaceae): Implications for climate change.
American Journal of Botany 78, 997. doi:10.2307/2445179
Jeffress, M.R., Rodhouse, T.J., Ray, C., Wolff, S., Epps, C.W., 2013. The idiosyncrasies
of place: Geographic variation in the climate-distribution relationships of the
American pika. Ecol. Appl. 23, 864–878. doi:10.1890/12-0979.1
Kelly, A.E., Goulden, M.L., 2008. Rapid shifts in plant distribution with recent climate
change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 11823–11826.
doi:10.1073/pnas.0802891105
Loik, M.E., Redar, S.P., Harte, J., 2000. Photosynthetic responses to a climate-warming
manipulation for contrasting meadow species in the Rocky Mountains, Colorado,
USA. Functional Ecology 14, 166–175. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2000.00411.x
MacArthur, R.A., Wang, L.C.H., 1973. Physiology of thermoregulation in the pika. Can.
J. Zool. 51, 11–16.
Page 58 of 62
Markham, O.D., Whicker, F.W., 1973. Notes on the behavior of the pika (Ochotona
princeps) in captivity. American Midland Naturalist 89, 192. doi:10.2307/2424146
Mccain, C.M., King, S.R.B., 2014. Body size and activity times mediate mammalian
responses to climate change. Glob. Chang. Biol. 20, 1760–1769.
doi:10.1111/gcb.12499
Mcdonald, K.A., Brown, J.H., 1992. Using montane mammals to model extinctions due
to global change. Conservation Biology 6, 409–415. doi:10.1046/j.1523-
1739.1992.06030409.x
Millar, J.S., Zwickel, F.C., 1972. Characteristics and ecological significance of hay piles
of pikas. Mammalia 36. doi:10.1515/mamm.1972.36.4.657
Millar, J.S., 1974. Success of reproduction in pikas, Ochotona princeps (Richardson). J.
Mammal. 55, 527–542. doi:10.2307/1379544
Millar, C.I., Westfall, R.D., 2010. Distribution and climatic relationships of the American
pika (Ochotona princeps) in the Sierra Nevada and Western Great Basin, U.S.A.;
Periglacial landforms as refugia in warming climates. Reply. Arctic, Antarct. Alp.
Res. 42, 493–496. doi:10.1657/1938-4246-42.4.493
Millar, C.I., Westfall, R.D., Delany, D.L., 2013. New records of marginal locations for
American pika (Ochotona princeps) in the Western Great Basin. Source West.
North Am. Nat. Brigham Young Univ. 73, 457–476. doi:10.3398/064.073.0412
Monson, R.K., Rosenstiel, T.N., Forbis, T.A., Lipson, D.A., Jaeger, C.H., 2006. Nitrogen
and carbon storage in alpine plants. Integr Comp Biol 46, 35-48.
doi:10.1093/icb/icj006
Page 59 of 62
Morrison, S.F., Hik, D.S., 2007. Demographic analysis of a declining pika Ochotona
collaris population: Linking survival to broad-scale climate patterns via spring
snowmelt patterns. J. Anim. Ecol. 76, 899–907. doi:10.1111/j.1365-
2656.2007.01276.x
Moyer-Horner, L., Beever, E.A., Johnson, D.H., Biel, M., Belt, J., 2016. Predictors of
current and longer-term patterns of abundance of American pikas (Ochotona
princeps) across a leading-edge protected area. PLoS ONE 11, 1-25.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167051
Nichols, L.B., Klingler, K.B., Peacock, M.M., 2016. American pikas (Ochotona Princeps)
extirpated from the historic masonic mining district of Eastern California. West.
North Am. Nat. 76, 163–171.
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, 2016. Potential
Evapotranspiration. Accessed 15 December 2016. [Available online at
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/monitoring-references/dyk/potential-evapotranspiration]
Osborne, C.P., 2007. Atmosphere, ecology and evolution: what drove the Miocene
expansion of C4 grasslands? Journal of Ecology. doi:10.1111/j.1365-
2745.2007.01323.x
Peacock, M.M., 1997. Determining natal dispersal patterns in a population of North
American pikas (Ochotona princeps) using direct mark-resight and indirect genetic
methods. Behav. Ecol. 8, 340–550.
Pepin, N., Bradley, R.S., Diaz, H.F., Baraer, M., Caceres, E.B., Forsythe, N., Fowler, H.,
Greenwood, G., Hashmi, M.Z., Liu, X.D., Miller, J.R., Ning, L., Ohmura, A., Palazzi,
E., Rangwala, I., Schöner, W., Severskiy, I., Shahgedanova, M., Wang, M.B.,
Williamson, S.N., Yang, D.Q., 2015. Elevation-dependent warming in mountain
Page 60 of 62
regions of the world. Nature Climate Change 5, 424–430.
doi:10.1038/nclimate2563
Promislow, D.E.L., Harvey, P.H., 1990. Living fast and dying young: A comparative
analysis of life-history variation among mammals. J. Zool., Lond. 220 417–437.
Ray, C., Beever, E.A., Rodhouse, T.J., 2016. Distribution of a climate-sensitive species
at an interior range margin. Ecosphere 7. doi:10.1002/ecs2.1379
Ray, C., Gilpin, M., Smith, A.T., 1991. The effect of conspecific attraction on
metapopulation dynamics. Biol. J. Linnean. Soc. 42, 123–134.
Robbins, C.T., Hanley, T.A., Hagerman, A.E., Hjeljord, O., Baker, D.L., Schwartz, C.C.,
Mautz, W.W., 1987. Role of tannins in defending plants against ruminants:
Reduction in protein availability. Ecology 68, 98–107. doi:10.2307/1938809
Rodhouse, T.J., Beever, E. A., Garrett, L.K., Irvine, K.M., Jeffress, M.R., Munts, M.,
Ray, C., 2010. Distribution of American pikas in a low-elevation lava landscape:
Conservation implications from the range periphery. J. Mammal. 91, 1287–1299.
doi:10.1644/09-MAMM-A-334.1
Sarukhán, J., 2006. Conservation biology: Views from the ecological sciences. Conserv.
Biol. 20, 674–676. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00461.x
Schwalm, D., Epps, C.W., Rodhouse, T.J., Monahan, W.B., Castillo, J.A., Ray, C.,
Jeffress, M.R., 2016. Habitat availability and gene flow influence diverging local
population trajectories under scenarios of climate change: A place-based approach.
Glob. Chang. Biol. 22, 1572–1584. doi:10.1111/gcb.13189
Page 61 of 62
Scott, R.L., Huxman, T.E., Barron-Gafford, G.A., Darrel Jenerette, G., Young, J.M.,
Hamerlynck, E.P., 2014. When vegetation change alters ecosystem water
availability. Glob. Chang. Biol. 20, 2198–2210. doi:10.1111/gcb.12511
Sheafor, B. A., 2003. Metabolic enzyme activities across an altitudinal gradient: an
examination of pikas (genus Ochotona). Journal of Experimental Biology 206,
1241–1249.
Smith, J.F., 1988. Influence of nutrition on ovulation rate in the ewe. Aust. J. Bioi. Sci.
41, 27–36.
Smith, A.T., 1974. The distribution and dispersal of pikas: Influences of behavior and
climate. Ecology 55, 1368–1376. doi:10.2307/1935464
Smith, J.A., Erb, L.P., 2013. Patterns of selective caching behavior of a generalist
herbivore , the American Pika (Ochotona princeps). Arctic, Antarct. Alp. Res. 45,
396–403. doi:10.1657/1938-4246-45.3.396
Stafl, N., O'connor, M.I., 2015. American pikas' (Ochotona princeps) foraging response
to hikers and sensitivity to heat in an alpine environment. Arctic, Antarctic, and
Alpine Research 47, 519–527. doi:10.1657/aaar0014-057
Stam, B., Malechek, J., Bartos, D., Bowns, J., and Godfrey, E., 2008. Effect of conifer
encroachment into aspen stands on understory biomass. Rangeland Ecology &
Management. 61, 93–97
Stewart, J.A.E., Perrine, J.D., Nichols, L.B., Thorne, J.H., Millar, C.I., Goehring, K.E.,
Massing, C.P., Wright, D.H., 2015. Revisiting the past to foretell the future: Summer
temperature and habitat area predict pika extirpations in California. J. Biogeogr. 42,
880–890. doi:10.1111/jbi.12466
Page 62 of 62
Torregrossa, A.-M., Dearing, M.D., 2009. Caching as a behavioral mechanism to reduce
toxin intake. J. mammal. 90, 803–810. doi:10.1644/08-MAMM-A-261.1
Tyser, R.W., 1980. Use of substrate for surveillance behaviors in a community of talus
slope mammals. American Midland Naturalist 104, 32. doi:10.2307/2424955
UNESCO, 2014. Mountains provide early warning of climate change. United Nations
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, Natural Sciences Sector.
http://www.unesco.org/new/en/media-services/single-
view/news/mountains_provide_early_warning_of_climate_change/
Varner, J., Dearing, M.D., 2014. Dietary plasticity in pikas as a strategy for atypical
resource landscapes. J. Mammal. 95, 72–81. doi:10.1644/13-MAMM-A-099.1
Varner, J., Lambert, M.S., Horns, J.J., Laverty, S., Dizney, L., Beever, E.A., Dearing,
M.D., 2015. Too hot to trot? Evaluating the effects of wildfire on patterns of
occupancy and abundance for a climate-sensitive habitat specialist. Int. J. Wildl.
Fire 24, 921–932. doi:10.1071/WF15038
Varner, J., Horns, J.J., Lambert, M.S., Westberg, E., Ruff, J.S., Wolfenberger, K.,
Beever, E.A., Dearing, M.D., 2016. Plastic pikas: Behavioural flexibility in low-
elevation pikas (Ochotona princeps). Behav. Processes 125, 63–71.
doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2016.01.009
Wall, T., Miller, R., Svejcar, T., 2006. Juniper encroachment in aspen in the Northwest
Great Basin. Journal of Range Management 54. doi:10.2458/azu_jrm_v54i6_wall
Wand, S.J.E., Midgley, G.F., Jones, M.H., Curtis, P.S., 1999. Responses of wild C4 and
C3 grass (Poaceae) species to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration: a meta-
analytic test of current theories and perceptions. Global Change Biology 5, 723–
741. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.1999.00265.x
Page 63 of 62
Wendler, G. Fahl, C., Corbin, S., 1972. Mass balance studies on McCall Glacier Brooks
Range, Alasaka. Arct. Alp. Res. 32, 211–222. doi:10.1657/1523-0430(07-069)
Westover, M.L., Smith, F.A., 2017. Dietary variation of the American pika in the Rrocky
Mountains across a century of climate change. Fourth Annual North American Pika
Consortium. Western Section of The Wildlife Society.
Wickhem, C., 2016. Testing the forage preference of the American pika (Ochotona
princeps) for use in connectivity corridors in the Washington Cascades. M.S.
Thesis. Central Washington University. Paper 452.
Wilkening, J.L., 2007. Effects of vegetation and temperature on pika (Ochotona
princeps) extirpations in the Great Basin. M.S. Thesis. University of Nevada, Reno.
Wilkening, J.L., Ray, C., Beever, E.A., Brussard, P.F., 2011. Modeling contemporary
range retraction in Great Basin pikas (Ochotona princeps) using data on
microclimate and microhabitat. Quat. Int. 235, 77–88.
doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2010.05.004
Wilson, R.J., Gutiérrez, D., Gutiérrez, J., Martínez, D., Agudo, R., Monserrat, V.J., 2005.
Changes to the elevational limits and extent of species ranges associated with
climate change. Ecol. Lett. 8, 1138–1146. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00824.x
Zorio, S.D., Williams, C.F., Aho, K.A., 2016. Sixty-five years of change in montane plant
communities in Western Colorado, U.S.A. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research
48, 703–722. doi:10.1657/aaar0016-011