71

Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations
Page 2: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Understood Volume ComputationsUnderstood Volume Computations

Did Not Understand Did Not Understand Volume ComputationsVolume Computations

Page 3: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Volume Seminar Summary

• What is Average End Area (AEA)?• Problems with AEA

– Gaps in your Survey Data– Non-Parallel Lines in AEA– Material on Inside and Outside of Turns

• Problems with Non-Parallel Lines in TINs• Problems with Thinning Data in AEA and TINs• Contour Dredging And Problems in Computation• Different Side Slope Treatments in USACE AEA

Page 4: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

TerminologyLeft Top Left Top of Bankof Bank

Left Left ToeToe

CenterlineCenterline Right Top Right Top of Bankof Bank

Center ChannelCenter Channel

Right ToeRight Toe

Design Design TemplateTemplate

Overdepth Overdepth TemplateTemplate

Supergrade Supergrade TemplateTemplate

Left Side SlopeLeft Side Slope Right Side SlopeRight Side SlopeLeft of CenterLeft of Center Right of CenterRight of Center

Design TemplateDesign Template

Overdepth TemplateOverdepth Template

Supergrade TemplateSupergrade Template

Page 5: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Reported Materials

• Most methods report quantities as ‘Left Slope, Center, and Right Slope.• Most methods report Material Above Design and Overdepth Material.• Some methods report Supergrade (3rd level) material and Norfolk reports a 4th level.

Page 6: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Reported Materials

• Sometimes, overdepth material is sometimes classified as Pay (V2P) vs Non-Pay (V2NP).

• Some folks call this ‘Contour’ material.

Page 7: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Pre-Dredge versus Post-Dredge

Some methods report additional quantities. For example:• X1 (L and R): Amount of material available in the side slope overdepth template

based on the After Dredge survey.• X2 (L and R): Amount of void beneath the overdepth template, measured from

the toe inward a specified distance, based on the After Dredge survey.• Y1: (Add Back Material) Any area where the After Dredge survey is shoaler than

the Before Dredge survey.More about this stuff later…..

V1

V2PV2NP

X2L

Y1

Page 8: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Average End Area (AEA)

What AEA Computes

Volume = L * (Area 1 + Area 2) / Volume = L * (Area 1 + Area 2) / 22

Page 9: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Things to Ponder

• AEA has no interest on what happens between the sections.

• This assumes a ‘uniform’ bottom between sections.

• AEA doesn’t give any credit for how deep the bottom is beneath the template.

Page 10: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

AEA Treatment of Soundings Below Design0+

00

1+00

2+00

3+00

4+00

5+00

6+00

Bottom Alternating Above and Below Design

0+00

1+00

2+00

3+00

4+00

5+00

6+00

What AEA ‘Sees’

If the channel is 200m wide:

AEA Volume = 50,000m3 TIN Volume = 25,000m3

9m10m11m

10m9m

Page 11: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

AEA: No Credit for Depth Dropping Below Template!

• In our first section, the bottom is a constant 9’ deep across our 10’ center channel depth.– Center Channel is 200 feet

across.

– AEA reports an area of 200 ft2

• In the adjacent section, the bottom is a constant 11’ deep across our center channel depth.– Center Channel is 200 feet

across.

– AEA reports an area of 0 ft2. There is no ‘credit’ for the bottom being beneath the template.

Page 12: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Bottom Close to Design

• In areas where the bottom continues to go above and below the design depth, a TIN MODEL method will give a more accurate result.

Page 13: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Lines run Parallel to a Contour

• AEA methods treat each sounding as if it was collected along the planned line.

• This can create errors in the volume computation if the lines are not perpendicular to the slopes.

Page 14: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Lines Non-Parallel to the Slope

Line run 10’ to the west of the planned line. (Purple)

Line run exactly along the planned line. (Blue)

Line 1: Area = 22.55 Line 1: Area = 22.55 ft2ft2

Line 2: Area = 36.59 Line 2: Area = 36.59 ft2ft2

It’s a small difference It’s a small difference in this example, but in this example, but can be a significant can be a significant amount of material in amount of material in cases where the lines cases where the lines are almost parallel to are almost parallel to the side slopes.the side slopes.

Page 15: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Gaps In Survey Data

• Exterior Gaps

• Interior Gaps

• Pre-Dredge versus Post-Dredge Coverage

Page 16: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Incomplete Survey Data: Exterior Gaps

• Not completing a section results in a loss of computed material.• You don’t want to ‘create’ the missing data on the end of the

section. (Your cell won’t be as nice as Martha Stewart’s.)

Page 17: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Incomplete Survey Data: Exterior

• Line 3 has incomplete survey data.

• AEA doesn’t care.– V23 = 100*(A2+A3)/2– V34 = 100*(A3+A4)/2– Since A3 is less than it

should be, the volume quantity will also be less.

– I could use a TIN MODEL and tell it to connect across the gap.

• It might be more accurate to leave Line 3 out of the computation.– V24 = 200*(A2+A4)/2

– Better overall result if the sectional profiles are similar.

Page 18: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Incomplete Data: Interior GapsInterior Gaps:

• Some people will interpolate across any interior gap (HYPACK for one).

• Some people will only interpolate across gaps if the distance is less than a specified distance.

• Spanning across gaps can give a VERY misleading result if the gap spans the toe line.

No Data No Data Between Between ArrowsArrows

Page 19: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Unequal Coverage: Pre vs. Post

• Most AEA methods don’t check for coverage differences between Pre-Dredge and Post-Dredge surveys.

• If I don’t make any ‘adjustments’:– I won’t get any credit for dredging in the ‘B’ area.– I will get credit for removing all of the ‘C’ area.

Page 20: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Computing the Distance Between Lines

• When comparing volumes from different programs:– The Areas generally agree very closely.

• Provided the sections span the entire channel. (No gaps).

– The Distance Between Lines used by each method is where we find the ‘difference’.

• No difference in parallel lines of equal length.• A little difference in parallel lines of unequal length.• A lot of difference in non-parallel lines of unequal length.

Page 21: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Average End AreaDistance Between Lines

L

Line 1

Line 2 Line 2

Line 1

VOLUMEAEA = L * (A1 + A2)

Parallel Lines of Parallel Lines of Equal Length:Equal Length:

Generally Good Agreement on L

Non-Parallel Lines of Non-Parallel Lines of Unequal Length:Unequal Length:

Hoo-boy.

L???L?

Line 1

Line 2

Parallel Lines of Parallel Lines of Unequal Length:Unequal Length:

Trouble starts.

Page 22: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Distance Between Lines - Methods

L = Distance Between Midpoints

L = Average Distance Between Endpoints

L = Average Distance Between Lines Constructed from Midpoint of Each Line to the Perpendicular Intersection of the Other Line (HYPACK)

Page 23: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Mathematical Truth

50m

50m

100m

200m

111.80m

141.42m

Line 1

Line 2

Example: We have two non-parallel survey lines that are of different lengths. Material covers the surface to a uniform thickness of 1m.

Volume 1 = 2,500m3

Volume 2 = 5,000m3

Volume 3 = 5,000m3

Volume Total = 12,500m3

Area 1 = .5 x 50 x 100

Area 1 = 2,500 m2

Area 2 = 50 x 100

Area 2 = 5,000 m2

Area 3 = .5 x 100 x 100

Area 3 = 5,000 m2

Page 24: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Midpoint to Midpoint

50m

100m

200m

111.80m

141.42m

Line 1

Line 2

50m

50m

25m

L

L = sqr(752 + 502) = 90.14mA1 = 111.80m2

A2 = 200.00m2

AEA = L * (A1 + A2) / 2

AEA = 90.14 * (111.80 + 200.00) / 2

AEA = 14,053m3 (+12%)

Page 25: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Average Distance Between Endpoints

50m

100m

200m

111.80m

141.42m

Line 1

Line 2

50m

50m

25m

L = (50.00 + 141.42 ) / 2

L = 95.71m

A1 = 111.80m2

A2 = 200.00m2

AEA = L * (A1 + A2) / 2

AEA = 95.71 * (111.80 + 200.00) / 2

AEA = 14,921m3 (+19%)

If anybody tries to pull this one on you, just send them to jail.

Page 26: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

HYPACK® MethodIn Theory

50m

100m

200m

111.80m

141.42m

Line 1

Line 2

50m

50m

25m

L2

L = (L1 + L2) / 2

• L1 = Distance from Midpoint of Line 1 to perpendicular intersection of Line 2

• L2 = Distance from Midpoint of Line 2 to perpendicular intersection of Line 1

L = (75.00 + 89.44) / 2 = 82.22m

A1 = 111.80m2

A2 = 200.00m2

AEA = L * (A1 + A2) / 2

AEA = 82.22 * (111.80 + 200.00) / 2

AEA = 12,818m3 (+2%)

L1

50m

Page 27: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

HYPACK® MethodIn Practice

50m

100m

200m

111.80m

141.42m

Line 1

Line 2

50m

50m

25m

L2

A1 = 111.80m2

A2 = 200.00m2

AEA = L * (A1 + A2) / 2

AEA = 82.22 * (111.80 + 200.00) / 2

AEA = 12,818m3 (+2%)

L1

Page 28: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

HYPACK® TIN MODELTIN MODEL Volume = TIN MODEL Volume = 12,499.77 m12,499.77 m33 (0%) (0%)

With a ‘uniform’ With a ‘uniform’ surface, the TIN surface, the TIN MODEL gives the best MODEL gives the best answer when lines are answer when lines are non-parallel and of non-parallel and of unequal length.unequal length.

Page 29: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Comparisons

Method Volume (m3) Error

Mathematical Truth 12,500 None

Midpoint to Midpoint 14,053 +12%

Average Distance Between Line Ends 14,921 +19%

HYPACK® CS&V 12,818 +2%

HYPACK® TIN MODEL 12,499.8 -0.002%

CONCLUSIONCONCLUSION: If you have lines that are non-parallel and/or of If you have lines that are non-parallel and/or of different lengths, the TIN MODEL method will give the most accurate different lengths, the TIN MODEL method will give the most accurate result.result.

Page 30: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Material on the Inside/Outside of Turns

• AEA does not consider where along the section the material is located.

• This can result in errors if you have non-parallel lines and have material along the inside or outside of the turn

Page 31: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

For Example:

50m wide strip of material on outside of turn

50m wide strip of material on middle of turn

50m wide strip of material on inside of turn

Page 32: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Volume Summary

AEA Method TIN MODEL

Material on Outside of Turn

18,962m3

(60%)31,621m3

Material on Center of Turn

19,127m3

(99%)19,237m3

Material on Inside of Turn

19,723m3

(330%)5,977m3

CONCLUSION:CONCLUSION: If you are going around a turn, use a TIN If you are going around a turn, use a TIN MODEL.MODEL.

Page 33: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Single Beam Data in TIN MODEL

• If you have single beam data….• If your planned lines are of unequal

length and/or direction….• If the planned lines are not perpendicular

to the bottom contour….• If you are doing volumes in TIN

MODEL….

BEWARE of Scallops!!!

Page 34: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Our Example

I have a ‘flat’ bottom of 10m across most of the channel. When I get to about 20m of the western side, the bottom slopes up to 0m at the end-of-line.

Page 35: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

SectionsNorth Segment: 316.2m long.

Note the bottom travels directly along the template in the center channel and up the right slope.

South Segment: 200m long.

Note the bottom travels directly along the template in the center channel and up the right slope.

AEA Volume = 0mAEA Volume = 0m33 above design template. above design template. This is correct!This is correct!

Page 36: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

TIN MODEL – Delaunay Triangles

When you create ‘Delaunay’ triangles, one sounding at the end of a line can be used as a vertex in many triangles.

If this ‘one sounding’ is shallow, it can create a ‘scalloping’ effect on the surface model.

TIN MODEL Volume = 8,976 m3

Page 37: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

TIN MODEL – Proportional Triangles

If we remove the ‘Delaunay’ triangle requirement and create triangles that are ‘proportional’ based on the distance along line, the TIN MODEL can give a more appropriate result.

TIN MODEL Volume = 0.00 m3

Page 38: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

USACE Buffalo Data Set (Stapleton)

This is where we discovered the problem.

The lines are non-parallel and the material is concentrated at the ‘outside’ of the turn.

Page 39: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Stapleton Data – Standard HYPACK Method

• The ‘Standard HYPACK’ [SH] method provides a more accurate volume when you have non-parallel lines and material is concentrated at the outside [or inside] of the turn.

• SH cuts the area between survey lines into proportional ‘slices’. It computes a depth at each corner of the slice, compares it to the design template and computes the volume for each slice.

• It then ‘sums’ the volume for all of the slices to get the volume for the section.

“I can see why the SH might be more accurate than the AEA for this example, but why is the TIN coming up with so much material?”

Page 40: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Stapleton Data Set - TIN

The graphic shows the contours generated from the TIN of the Stapleton data.

Along the edge, you can see a “scalloping” effect, where the contours ‘bulge’ into the channel.

This is caused by the survey lines being non-parallel to the upslope and by the way the TIN MODEL connects data points.

Page 41: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Stapleton Data Summary

Method Center Vol

AEA 26,664 yd³

St. HYPACK 34,217

TIN MODEL 45,261

•All of these values came from the same data set.

•All of these values came from methods that are accepted and widely used in industry.

•Does this mean that one method is better than another? No. Each method has its strengths and weaknesses, based on the underlying assumptions. [I would use the Standard HYPACK method or the TIN MODEL with ‘Align TIN’ in this case if it was my money.]

Page 42: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Data Thinning

• You can influence the volume quantity by ‘thinning your data’.– True with Single Beam Data in AEA.– True with Multibeam Data in TIN MODEL.

Page 43: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Single Beam Data: Original Data at 0.5’/sounding; Thinned Data at 10’/sounding

Data Thinning: Single Beam Data

Dredge Vol. Over-Dredge Vol.

0.5’ Spacing (Black) 28,938 yd³ 30,928 yd³

10.0’ Spacing (Green) 28,009 yd³ 30,663 yd³

Delta = 929 yd3 (-3.2%)

This is what 929 yd3 of contaminated material looks like:

Page 44: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Same SB Data, Different Thinning

• In general:– The total volume

quantity will vary as you change the spacing between your data points.

– It may not always look like the graph shown, but there is usually a maximum and minimum point.

Note: Surveying at a faster speed is the same as ‘thinning’ your data.

Page 45: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Multibeam Volumes Volume vs. BIN Size – Three Examples

Design Volume Over-Dredge Volume

Exam

ple

#1E

xamp

le #2

Exam

ple

#3

The same rule The same rule applies to applies to Multibeam and Multibeam and Multiple Transducer Multiple Transducer survey data.survey data.

Volume quantity Volume quantity changes as you changes as you change the BIN size change the BIN size used to reduce the used to reduce the data.data.

It’s impossible to It’s impossible to predict if increasing predict if increasing the BIN size will the BIN size will result in an increase result in an increase or decrease in or decrease in volume quantity.volume quantity.

Page 46: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Data Spacing

• In the last couple of years, the USACE guidelines now recommend that maximum spacing between soundings and maximum BIN sizes be included as a part of the project specification.

• For single beam data in HYPACK, we recommend that the user take the edited data file directly into CS&V without performing any sounding selection.

Page 47: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Contour Dredging(Only Affects Overdepth Volume Quantity)

• Non-Contour: – Includes all

available overdepth material (top).

• Contour:– Includes only

overdepth material where the bottom is above the design template.

Problems arise when computing the Problems arise when computing the Contour material removed between a Contour material removed between a Pre-Dredge and a Post-Dredge survey.Pre-Dredge and a Post-Dredge survey.

Page 48: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Example: Contour versus Non-Contour Method

Pre-Dredge Depth = 9.9’Pre-Dredge Depth = 9.9’ Post-Dredge Depth = 10.1’Post-Dredge Depth = 10.1’

Non-Contour Overdepth:Non-Contour Overdepth:

Pre-Dredge = 200 ftPre-Dredge = 200 ft22

Post-Dredge = 180 ftPost-Dredge = 180 ft22

Delta = 20ftDelta = 20ft22

Contour Overdepth:Contour Overdepth:

Pre-Dredge = 200 ftPre-Dredge = 200 ft22

Post-Dredge = 0 ftPost-Dredge = 0 ft22

Delta = 200ftDelta = 200ft22

Page 49: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Shifting versus DiggingUp top is my Pre-Up top is my Pre-Dredge section.Dredge section.

Available Design Mat. = Available Design Mat. = 40 x .5 = 20ft40 x .5 = 20ft22

Available Overdepth Available Overdepth (Contour) = 40 x .5 = (Contour) = 40 x .5 = 20ft20ft22

Below is my Pre-Below is my Pre-Dredge section. I Dredge section. I haven’t dug anything, haven’t dug anything, I’ve just shifted the I’ve just shifted the material to the right.material to the right.

Available Design Mat. = Available Design Mat. = 40 x .5 = 20ft40 x .5 = 20ft22

Available Overdepth = Available Overdepth = 40 x .5 = 20ft40 x .5 = 20ft22

Pre-Dredge Survey

Post-Dredge Survey

Page 50: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Pre vs. Post – Philadelphia Method

If we don’t consider the ADDBACK (Y1) material, we will get credit for removing If we don’t consider the ADDBACK (Y1) material, we will get credit for removing the 20ftthe 20ft22 of design material and 20ft of design material and 20ft22 of overdepth material on the Left of Center. of overdepth material on the Left of Center.

Page 51: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Pre vs. Post – Philadelphia Method

If we consider the ADDBACK (Y1) material, the ‘material removed’ will equal the If we consider the ADDBACK (Y1) material, the ‘material removed’ will equal the ‘material added’, and we will get no credit for any material.‘material added’, and we will get no credit for any material.

Page 52: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

AEA3 Method Reported Materials

Single Surveys:Single Surveys:

AEA 1:AEA 1: V1L V1 V1R V2L V2 V2R V3L V3 V3RV1L V1 V1R V2L V2 V2R V3L V3 V3R

AEA 2:AEA 2: V1L V1 V1R V2P V2NP V3V1L V1 V1R V2P V2NP V3

Pre-Dredge vs. Post-Dredge:Pre-Dredge vs. Post-Dredge:

AEA 3:AEA 3: V1L V1 V1R V2 V2P V2NP V2R V3L V3 V3R X1 X2 Y1V1L V1 V1R V2 V2P V2NP V2R V3L V3 V3R X1 X2 Y1

Page 53: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

AEA3 – Other Materials

X1: Side slope overdredge material available after dredging.

X2: Material removed beneath the overdredge template within a user-defined distance of the toe.

Y1: Material added during the dredging operation.

Page 54: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Pre-Dredge Section

Post-Dredge Section

Our ‘Shifting’ Example in AEA3

Page 55: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Design Material (V1) – Pre-Dredge

This shows the area of available material (based on the Pre-This shows the area of available material (based on the Pre-Dredge survey) to be 20ftDredge survey) to be 20ft22..

V2P material (for both Pre-Dredge and Post-Dredge surveys V2P material (for both Pre-Dredge and Post-Dredge surveys will only be computed underneath this V1-Pre material. will only be computed underneath this V1-Pre material. Outside this area will be V2NP.Outside this area will be V2NP.

Page 56: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Design Material (V1) – Post-Dredge

This shows the area of available material (based on the Post-This shows the area of available material (based on the Post-Dredge survey) to be 20ftDredge survey) to be 20ft22..

Note: The computation of the V1-post material is not limited Note: The computation of the V1-post material is not limited by the location of the V1-Pre material.by the location of the V1-Pre material.

Page 57: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Design Material (Y1) – Add Back

• Everywhere the Post-Dredge survey is above the Pre-Dredge Everywhere the Post-Dredge survey is above the Pre-Dredge survey will be computed as Add Back (Y1) material.survey will be computed as Add Back (Y1) material.

• It will be assigned V1, V2, V2NP based on the location of the It will be assigned V1, V2, V2NP based on the location of the added material.added material.

Page 58: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

V1 Info

Delta = Pre – PostDelta = Pre – Post = 0.0ft = 0.0ft22

• This represents the material This represents the material difference between the Pre-difference between the Pre-Dredge and Post-Dredge Dredge and Post-Dredge surveys.surveys.

• You get no credit for moving You get no credit for moving stuff sideways. (Our example!)stuff sideways. (Our example!)

• This can be a negative number This can be a negative number if more material is found in the if more material is found in the Post-Dredge survey than was Post-Dredge survey than was available based on the Pre-available based on the Pre-Dredge survey.Dredge survey.

TotPay = Pre – Post + Y1TotPay = Pre – Post + Y1 = 20.0ft = 20.0ft22

This is the ‘Delta’ value (left) plus This is the ‘Delta’ value (left) plus the Add Back material.the Add Back material.

In our example, they are credited In our example, they are credited for removing (or moving) the V1 for removing (or moving) the V1 material found in the Pre-Dredge material found in the Pre-Dredge Survey.Survey.

Page 59: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Overdepth (V2P) – Pre-Dredge

V2P = Overdepth material where the Pre-Dredge bottom is V2P = Overdepth material where the Pre-Dredge bottom is above the design.above the design.

V2P material (for both Pre-Dredge and Post-Dredge surveys) V2P material (for both Pre-Dredge and Post-Dredge surveys) will only be computed underneath this V1-Pre material. will only be computed underneath this V1-Pre material. Outside this area will be V2NP. This is the basis for both the Outside this area will be V2NP. This is the basis for both the Pre-Dredge and Post-Dredge!Pre-Dredge and Post-Dredge!

Page 60: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Overdepth (V2P) – Post-Dredge

V2P = Overdepth material where the Pre-Dredge bottom is V2P = Overdepth material where the Pre-Dredge bottom is above the design depth.above the design depth.

Page 61: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

V2P Info

Delta = Pre – PostDelta = Pre – Post = 20.0ft = 20.0ft22

• This represents the material This represents the material difference between the Pre-difference between the Pre-Dredge and Post-Dredge Dredge and Post-Dredge surveys.surveys.

TotPay = Pre – Post + Y1TotPay = Pre – Post + Y1 = 20.0ft = 20.0ft22

Since there isn’t any material that Since there isn’t any material that has been ‘Added Back’ in the V2P has been ‘Added Back’ in the V2P area, the Delta = TotPay.area, the Delta = TotPay.

Pre-Dredge Section

Post-Dredge Section

Page 62: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Overdepth (V2NP) – Pre-Dredge

V2NP = Overdepth material computed only where the Pre-V2NP = Overdepth material computed only where the Pre-Dredge survey bottom is beneath the design.Dredge survey bottom is beneath the design.

Page 63: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Overdepth (V2NP) – Post-Dredge

V2NP = Overdepth material computed only where the Pre-V2NP = Overdepth material computed only where the Pre-Dredge survey bottom is beneath the design.Dredge survey bottom is beneath the design.

Page 64: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Overdepth (V2NP-Y1) – Add Back

• Everywhere the Post-Dredge survey is above the Pre-Dredge Everywhere the Post-Dredge survey is above the Pre-Dredge survey will be computed as Add Back (Y1) material.survey will be computed as Add Back (Y1) material.

• It will be assigned V1, V2, V2NP based on the location of the It will be assigned V1, V2, V2NP based on the location of the added material.added material.

Page 65: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

V2NP Info

Delta = Pre – PostDelta = Pre – Post = -20.0ft = -20.0ft22

• This is negative, as there is This is negative, as there is more V2NP material in the Post-more V2NP material in the Post-Dredge survey than in the Pre-Dredge survey than in the Pre-Dredge survey.Dredge survey.

TotPay = Pre – Post + Y1TotPay = Pre – Post + Y1 = 0.0ft = 0.0ft22

Pre-Dredge Section

Post-Dredge Section

Page 66: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

What’s it all mean?

• The Delta number shows me that they didn’t actually remove anything. They shifted some overdepth material so that it’s classification changed from V2P (+20) to V2NP (-20).

• The TotPay number shows me that if I only perform the computation in the area of available material (based on the Pre-Dredge Survey), they have eliminated the V1 and V2P material that existed. Pre-Dredge

SectionPost-Dredge Section

Page 67: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Differing Side Slope Treatments1.1. It’s not easy to dig It’s not easy to dig

accurately on the side accurately on the side slopes.slopes.

2.2. If the bottom material is If the bottom material is ‘soft’, the contractor might ‘soft’, the contractor might be allowed to dig a hole at be allowed to dig a hole at the bottom of the side the bottom of the side slope.slope.

3.3. The idea is that the The idea is that the material on the side slope material on the side slope will ‘fall’ into the hole over will ‘fall’ into the hole over time.time.

4.4. Different USACE methods Different USACE methods use different parameters use different parameters to compute the available to compute the available material and the size of material and the size of the hole.the hole.

Page 68: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

HYPACK AEA3 Method

X1: Side slope overdepth material available after dredging. No Design Material is included!

X2: Material removed beneath the overdepth template within a user-defined distance inward from the toe.

Idea: If X2>X1 then contractor gets credit for X1. If X1>X2 then contractor gets credit for X2.

Page 69: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

Jacksonville Post-Dredge Method

A = Side slope material available A = Side slope material available in both the overdepth prism and in both the overdepth prism and above the design template.above the design template.

B = Void in direction outward B = Void in direction outward from the toe line. from the toe line.

C = Void in direction inward from C = Void in direction inward from toe line to a user-specified toe line to a user-specified distance. (Bottom must be distance. (Bottom must be beneath overdepth template at beneath overdepth template at toe line for either B or credit.)toe line for either B or credit.)

If A > (B+C), then Credit = B+CIf A > (B+C), then Credit = B+C

If A < (B+C), then Credit = AIf A < (B+C), then Credit = A

Page 70: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

GLDD Method

Area Available Material

Void Applied Rules

Design Material A D + E + F Use A – (D + E + F)If A < (D + E + F) then use 0.0

Overdepth Material A + B E + F Use (A + B) - (E + F)If (A + B) < (E + F) then use 0.0

Superdepth Material A + B + C F Use (A + B + C) - FIf (A + B + C) < F then use 0.0

Page 71: Understood Volume Computations Did Not Understand Volume Computations

The End

Pat Sanders, Pres.

HYPACK, Inc.

[email protected]

www.hypack.com