U.S. Army Materiel Command | Army Sustainment Command U.S. Army Sustainment Command FORSCOM CDR’s...
of 6/6
U.S. Army Materiel Command | U.S. Army Materiel Command | Army Sustainment Command U.S. Army Sustainment Command FORSCOM CDR’s Conference DOL Transition Update 2 OCT 2012 COL Dan Rei Installation Logistics Director AMSAS- DSN 793-5 [email protected]
U.S. Army Materiel Command | Army Sustainment Command U.S. Army Sustainment Command FORSCOM CDR’s Conference DOL Transition Update 2 OCT 2012 COL Dan Reilly
Text of U.S. Army Materiel Command | Army Sustainment Command U.S. Army Sustainment Command FORSCOM CDR’s...
Slide 1
U.S. Army Materiel Command | Army Sustainment Command U.S. Army
Sustainment Command FORSCOM CDRs Conference DOL Transition Update 2
OCT 2012 COL Dan Reilly Installation Logistics Directorate
AMSAS-FSI DSN 793-5070 [email protected]
Slide 2
U.S. Army Materiel Command | Army Sustainment Command What We
Want to Leave You With 2 Transfer is on track and will culminate
over 24 months of operational control and detailed planning with
stakeholders FY 13 Program Budget Guidance (PBG) funding of $ 656
million to installations based upon the pay, non-pay and contract
requirements identified. The PBG allocation funds 100% of civilian
pay and approximately 10% of non-pay and 25% of contract
obligations. The unfunded requirement is over $200+ million. While
challenges remain in funding, these challenges would be the same
even if the transfer did not occur. Additionally, the PBG
allocation doesn't include supplemental funding, reimbursable
funding or the reduction in the contract requirement based upon
buying forward with end of year funds. In short, the true delta may
be less than identified but costs to support Army initiatives (such
as local moves, etc) may be unfunded. In FY13, EAGLE will be
implemented on 13 installations. EAGLE consolidates/optimizes
installation contracts; in CONUS alone, the EAGLE program will
consolidate 148 separate contracts into 40 installation logistics
contracts, with standardized Performance Work Statements (PWS) and
performance measures. The goal is a single logistics provider on
each installation for supply, maintenance, and transportation.
Laundry & dry cleaning, food service, and aviation maintenance
will fall outside the scope of EAGLE. A-76 DOLs assume more risk
than Most Efficient Organization (MEO) DOLs. Additionally,
Non-Tactical Vehicles and Dining Facility Operations, large
consumers of QLOG dollars, are at risk for reduced services.
Manpower assessments to be conducted. As we move forward, our
priorities for DOLs include FY 13 execution, establishment of the
Common Level of Support (CLS) baseline, Memorandums of Agreement,
manpower assessment, FY 14 DOL transfer (JBLM and Kwajalein), Eagle
Implementation, and the Personal Property Shipping Office
consolidation. Bottom Line : the DOLs will continue to provide
installation-level logistics, supporting Senior Commander
priorities within the limits of available resources and IAW area
support responsibilities outlined in Army Regulation 5-9.
Slide 3
U.S. Army Materiel Command | Army Sustainment Command Effective
1 October 2012, Army Sustainment Command accepts transfer of
resources, assumes full control of Directorates of Logistics from
Installation Management Command, and provides installation level
logistics in support of Senior Commanders and force generation to
align core competencies, eliminate redundancies, gain efficiencies,
and produce readiness at best value. 3 DOL Mission Transfer Partner
with IMCOM and installations to set conditions, conduct change
management, and establish service baselines. Set the conditions
required to execute the Basic Ordering Agreements (BOA) for the OSD
approved Enhanced Army Global Logistics Enterprise (EAGLE)
acquisition strategy. Implement Sec Army directive Transfer 73 DOLs
worldwide, including 4 Reserve Component; does not include JBLM
(scheduled for FY14) or Heidelberg Transfer action is zero sum = No
new bills to the Army AMC assumes responsibility within Army FY 13
PBG ($656M) Cost-Benefit Analysis validated by DASA-CE AMC updating
MOAs Key Tasks -
Slide 4
U.S. Army Materiel Command | Army Sustainment Command Resource
Challenges (PBG & CBA) 4 PBG : FY13 DOL budget is ~22% less
than FY 12 Limited flexibility due to pay &contracts; PBG
spread supports 100% of pay, 10% of non-pay and 25% of contracts
Delta / UFR reduced through reimbursable, OCO and buying forward
contracts Senior Commanders decisions on local moves, etc may
impact CLS services Installations must sustain efficiencies gained
based upon FY12 reductions & S3U and continue to look for
efficiencies Significant decrease from FY12 to FY13 DASA-CE
validated CBA provides four year glide path to achieve directed PBG
This requires funding above the projected PBG. Execute a
comprehensive manpower study and align personnel resources.
Slide 5
U.S. Army Materiel Command | Army Sustainment Command 5
Memorandum of Agreements MOAs between AMC and ACOM / ASCC / DRU.
Baseline CLS serves as annex to MOA Basis for installation support
agreements Staffed in time for POM 15-19 input to address direct
fund or reimbursable Current ISSAs should remain in effect until
new ISSAs are signed or updated based upon the updated MOA and
baseline CLS CLS baseline is crucial to expectation management.
Differences vary based upon type installation. ISSAs/MOAs
reimbursable support must be factored into the POM process by the
requiring activity. Policy issues for food service operations,
NTVs, etc will affect future CLS.
Slide 6
U.S. Army Materiel Command | Army Sustainment Command 6 ASC DOL
Way Ahead Timeline Moving Target