17
using instrumented aircraft to bridge the observational gap between ICESat and ICESat-2

using instrumented aircraft to bridge the observational gap between ICESat and ICESat-2

  • Upload
    blade

  • View
    29

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Operation IceBridge. using instrumented aircraft to bridge the observational gap between ICESat and ICESat-2. Image: M. Studinger. New Suborbital Mission: Operation IceBridge. Science Requirements. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: using instrumented aircraft to bridge the observational gap between ICESat and ICESat-2

using instrumented aircraftto bridge the observational gapbetween ICESat and ICESat-2

Page 2: using instrumented aircraft to bridge the observational gap between ICESat and ICESat-2

New Suborbital Mission: Operation IceBridge

Page 3: using instrumented aircraft to bridge the observational gap between ICESat and ICESat-2

1) IceBridge shall make altimetry measurements that enable determination of surface elevation change to an uncertainty of 10 cm/yr over outlet glaciers of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets.

2) IceBridge shall make measurements that enable determination of surface slopes to an uncertainty of 0.5°.

3) IceBridge shall fly at least 250,000 total km per year, with 30,000 km per year specifically along ICESat tracks over sea ice and land ice.

4) IceBridge shall fly at least 500 km per year as underflights along CryoSat-2 tracks over sea ice and land ice.

5) IceBridge shall, for at least two field seasons, make altimetry measurements along a swath of the southern limit of the ICESat tracks, enabling direct comparisons of surface elevations for a large number of ICESat tracks.

6) IceBridge shall make repeat altimetry measurements that enable determination of surface elevations, and surface elevation change, in critical areas where ICESat data are limited or non-existent, including: coastal Greenland, Antarctica’s Pine Island, Thwaites and Crane Glaciers, Amundsen Coast, Antarctic Peninsula, accessible areas of East Antarctica, accessible areas of the South Pole region not surveyed by ICESat

Page 4: using instrumented aircraft to bridge the observational gap between ICESat and ICESat-2

7) IceBridge shall make radar measurements that enable mapping and characterization of the bedrock beneath land-based ice as follows: For Greenland: in consideration of existing data, to establish a 100 km by 100 km grid and provide 10 km by 10 km grids over five major outlet glacier catchments. For Antarctica, provide mapping over accessible outlet glaciers that improve numerical models of ice sheet flow according to the priorities in #6.

8) IceBridge shall make gravity measurements that enable the determination of bathymetry beneath ice shelves and sub-ice-sheet bedrock topography that cannot be mapped with radar for five key outlet glaciers in Greenland and accessible portions of Antarctica according to the priorities in #6.

9) IceBridge shall conduct flight experiments that enable the inter-calibration of the flight instruments and the characterization of their errors.

10)IceBridge shall in conjunction with altimetry measurements make measurements to determine the thickness and structure of the snow and firn layer.

Page 5: using instrumented aircraft to bridge the observational gap between ICESat and ICESat-2

IceBridge exploits airborne platforms when making altimetry measurements to make other critical measurements to understanding change in polar ice sheets

UAF: laser scanner ;UTIG/ICECAP: depth sounder, point laser, photon counter, grav + mag

Page 6: using instrumented aircraft to bridge the observational gap between ICESat and ICESat-2

Instrument

Purpose 1,5oo ft AGL

35,000 ft

ATM laser altimeter (ice surface elevation) 1,500 ft AGL

LVIS laser altimeter (ice surface elevation) 35,000 ft

DMS digital photography (DEM generation)

MCoRDS bedrock elevation

Snow radar snow thickness

Ku-band rad.

ice surface elevation

Accumulation

near-surface layers

Gravimeter water depth, sub-ice geology, geoid? = low resolution data= possible = impossible

Page 7: using instrumented aircraft to bridge the observational gap between ICESat and ICESat-2

• largest external structureever flown on a P-3

• designed, built, and installedin only 3 months

Page 8: using instrumented aircraft to bridge the observational gap between ICESat and ICESat-2
Page 9: using instrumented aircraft to bridge the observational gap between ICESat and ICESat-2

Instrument Measurement Frequency(Bandwidth)

Platform Deployment

MCoRDS •Ice Thickness•Bed

Characteristics•Bed Imaging•Internal

Layering

195 MHz (30 MHz)

•DC-8•P-3

•Fall 2009 (DC-8)•Spring 2010 (DC-8 and

P-3)

Accumulation •Internal Layering

750 MHz (300 MHz)

•P-3 •Spring 2010 (P-3)

Snow Radar •Snow Cover•Internal

Layering•Topography

4.5 GHz (4 GHz) •DC-8•P-3

•Spring 2009 (P-3)•Fall 2009 (DC-8)•Spring 2010 (DC-8 and

P-3)

Ku-Band •Snow Cover•Topography

14 GHz (4 GHz) •DC-8•P-3

•Fall 2009 (DC-8)•Spring 2010 (DC-8 and

P-3)

IceBridge Radar Sensors

Range resolution in snow, assuming 500 kg/m3 surface density

Greenland 2009 Antarctica 2009 Greenland 2010

Snow Radar ~2.5 cm ~5.5 cm ~2.5 cm

Ku-band ~5.3 cm ~10.6 cm

Page 10: using instrumented aircraft to bridge the observational gap between ICESat and ICESat-2

Surface Elevation Measurements

Instrument Cross-over Analysis of 2009 Antarctic Data Sets

ATM 5-10 cm for cross-over passes < 3 days (all flights)*

LVIS Peninsula Flight (1,640 points) †1 cm ± 23 cm (1σ)

Pine Island Glacier (371 points) †

3 cm ± 18 cm (1σ)

DMS horizontal resolution and expected vertical resolutionpotential: better than 20 cm horizontal x 20 cm vertical

1,500 ft = 10 cm pixel size 35,000 ft = 2 m pixel size

* source: presentation by B. Krabill at Seattle workshop July 2010† source: presentation by B. Blair at Seattle workshop July 2010¶ source: presentation by J. Arvesen at Seattle workshop July 2010

ATM-derived DEMDMS-derived DEM

Page 11: using instrumented aircraft to bridge the observational gap between ICESat and ICESat-2

Backup Slides

Page 12: using instrumented aircraft to bridge the observational gap between ICESat and ICESat-2

Parametric spectral estimation techniques are used to identify and track the two most prominent spectral component.

Top Image: Spectral estimation using FFT.

Bottom Image: Parametric spectral estimation.

Page 13: using instrumented aircraft to bridge the observational gap between ICESat and ICESat-2

Antarctica 2009 – Pine Island Glacier

Snow Radar Ku-Band

Page 14: using instrumented aircraft to bridge the observational gap between ICESat and ICESat-2
Page 15: using instrumented aircraft to bridge the observational gap between ICESat and ICESat-2
Page 16: using instrumented aircraft to bridge the observational gap between ICESat and ICESat-2

Snow Radar description

Page 17: using instrumented aircraft to bridge the observational gap between ICESat and ICESat-2

Ku-band altimeter description