Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
October 2015
Report Number: 1516-8
WATERLOO WHARF
UXBRIDGE, PHASE II:
GEOARCHAEOLOGICAL
MONITORING OF
EVALUATION TRENCHES
Nick Watson
ARCA
Department of Archaeology
University of Winchester
Winchester
SO22 4NR
http://www.arcauk.com
Prepared for Cotswold
Archaeology
Waterloo Wharf, Phase II: Geoarchaeological monitoring of evaluation trenches.
Version Date Status* Prepared by Author’s signature Approved by Approver’s
Signature
01 12/10/15 E Nick
Watson
*I – Internal draft; E – External draft; F - Final
Waterloo Wharf, Phase II: Geoarchaeological monitoring of evaluation trenches.
1
CONTENTS
Contents ........................................................................................... 1
Figures .............................................................................................. 1
Summary .......................................................................................... 2
1. Introduction ................................................................................ 3
2. Methodology ................................................................................ 5
3. Evaluation Trench Stratigraphy................................................... 7
3.1 Colney Street Gravel Member. ............................................... 7
3.2 Alluvium. .............................................................................. 9
3.3 Organic Mud ....................................................................... 11
3.4 Made Ground ...................................................................... 11
4. Assessment ............................................................................... 12
4.1 Late Quaternary sedimentary sequence. .............................. 12
4.2 Comparison with Three Ways Wharf and Riverside Way. ..... 13
4.3 Archaeological and palaeoenvironmental potential. ............. 13
5 Acknowledgements .................................................................... 14
6. Bibliography ............................................................................. 15
Appendix 1: Evaluation trench Logs ................................................ 17
FIGURES
Figure 1. Site plan. Canal section: south to north T1, WS05, WS03,
T2, T3 LCP01. Waterloo Road section: south to north T9, T8,
WS04, T7, WS02, T6, T5, WS01. Evaluation trenches are marked
in blue and green and boreholes in black. (Plan courtesy of
Cotswold Archaeology)................................................................. 6
Figure 2. Waterloo Road section south to north. Vertical exaggeration
x5 ............................................................................................... 8
Figure 3. Canal section south to north. Vertical exaggeration x5. ....... 9
Figure 4. Isopach map ..................................................................... 10
Waterloo Wharf, Phase II: Geoarchaeological monitoring of evaluation trenches.
2
SUMMARY
This report is a geoarchaeological assessment of strata
sampled in eight evaluation trenches excavated by
machine at Waterloo Wharf, Uxbridge.
Gravels of the Late Devensian Colney Street Gravel
Member subcropped in all the trenches between c.30.64m
OD and c.29.67m OD. In two trenches and one borehole
the Colney Street Gravel Member was overlain by a black
organic mud facies of possible Late-Glacial to Early
Holocene date and indicative of a back swamp
environment. This stratum is suggested to be broadly
coeval with similar deposits at Three Ways Wharf and
Riverside Way. In three trenches and three out of four
boreholes beside the Grand Union Canal, fine grained
alluvial silt/clays unconformably overlay the gravels and
represent overbank flood plain deposits of unknown date.
Modern made ground sealed the stratigraphic sequence.
.
Waterloo Wharf, Phase II: Geoarchaeological monitoring of evaluation trenches.
3
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 In October 2015, at the request of Cotswold Archaeology on
behalf of their client Premier Forest Estates Ltd, ARCA carried
out a geoarchaeological monitoring programme of archaeological
evaluation trenches at Waterloo Wharf, Waterloo Road, Uxbridge
in the London Borough of Hillingdon (henceforth ‘the site’). The
geoarchaeological monitoring was carried out to investigate in
more detail the nature of the sub surface deposits on the site
that had been identified by a borehole survey monitored by
ARCA in August 2015 (Watson 2015). The work was in advance
of an application to the London Borough of Hillingdon Council
for redevelopment as outlined in the Written Scheme of
Investigation (WSI) and approved by Greater London
Archaeological Advisory Service (GLAAS) (Cotswold Archaeology
2015).
1.2 This document assesses the stratigraphic sequence beneath the site. It is arranged as follows: first, a brief account is provided of the geographical, geological and methodological background; secondly, the trench lithostratigraphy is described in detail; thirdly, a brief comparison is made to the strata recorded at Three Ways Wharf; and finally, an assessment is made of the archaeological and palaeoenvironmental potential of the sampled deposits. A bibliography and appendices containing borehole stratigraphic logs complete the document.
1.3 The site is approximately 0.4ha in size (NGR TQ 0497 8376) and is located on the east bank of the Grand Union Canal. To the east runs Waterloo Road with the northern boundary defined by Rockhampton Road and the southern boundary occupied by a boatyard and dry dock. The site lies within the valley of the River Colne, a major tributary of the Thames, rising in the Chilterns, and confluent with the Thames at Staines. It is situated towards the eastern edge of the present floodplain, which is traversed by a network of channels, both natural and artificial. The general ground level is c.31.50m OD.
1.4 The British Geological Survey (BGS) map the site as lying on
superficial deposits of unlithified alluvial silt and clay laid down
in the early Holocene (BGS 2015). The underlying bedrock is the
London Clay Formation that dates to the Eocene epoch 56 to
33.9 million years BP. To the east are deposits of the Langley
Silt Member, a Devensian (the last glacial stage in the Late
Pleistocene) periglacial loess otherwise known as brickearth. To
the west lie deposits of the Shepperton Gravel Member, a
Devensian terrace gravel. At higher elevations and several
Waterloo Wharf, Phase II: Geoarchaeological monitoring of evaluation trenches.
4
kilometres away from the site to the east and west are earlier
gravel terraces that developed in the Middle Pleistocene. Gravels
immediately underlying the present floodplain of the Colne in
the vicinity of the site are referred to as the Colney Street Gravel
Member, dated to the Late Devensian (Gibbard 1985, 81-2).
1.5 The site is within the Colne Valley Archaeological Priority Zone
and has been identified for its potential for Palaeolithic and
Mesolithic archaeology. The nationally significant site of Three
Ways Wharf (Lewis and Rackham 2011) is located c.800m north
where Upper Palaeolithic and Mesolithic lithic and faunal
remains were recovered. Recently, work at the former
Sandersons’ factory, now redeveloped as part of the Uxbridge
Business Park and one kilometre north of the site, was
undertaken by MoLAS and Cotswold Archaeology (MoLAS 2002
and 2006, Stastney 2015). Trenching and geoarchaeological
boreholes uncovered a deep sequence of alluvial deposits
including peat and tufa related to river channels in existence
during the Late Pleistocene to Early Holocene period. This suite
of alluvial strata is directly analogous to and apparently broadly
contemporary with Late-Glacial and Early Holocene strata
associated with Three Ways Wharf.
1.6 At Three Ways Wharf, in situ lithic and faunal scatters were
encountered within fine-grained mineral strata overlying the
Colney Street Gravel Member which in turn were sealed by a
sequence of black humic clay, tufa, and fine-grained mineral
alluvial strata (Lewis and Rackham 2011). Preservation of
palaeoenvironmental proxy indicators at Three Ways Wharf was
generally poor; however more recent investigations at the former
William King Flour Mill, immediately northwest of Three Ways
Wharf have demonstrated the potential to derive high-quality
multi-proxy palaeoenvironmental data from similar and broadly
contemporary sedimentary sequences (Grant et al. 2014). A
geoarchaeological borehole assessment at Plot A Uxbridge
Business Park in 2014 proved the case again with the recovery
of organic strata assessed as being of high palaeoenvironmental
potential (Stastney 2015).
1.7 Closer to the site at Waterloo Wharf archaeological investigation
has shown that the exceptional preservation of artefacts and
ecofacts seen at sites further north has not yet been found.
Work at Bansfield Allotments, c.300m northeast, recorded the
truncation of fine grained alluvial deposits over the river gravel;
and at 145 Waterloo Road made ground overlies the gravel
(CgMs 2007 cited in Cotswold 2015, p.5). On the other hand
Waterloo Wharf, Phase II: Geoarchaeological monitoring of evaluation trenches.
5
Riverside Way, c.200m west, preserves an Early Holocene
alluvial sequence overlying the Pleistocene gravels of grey silt
clay, black organic clay, peat and tufa; there was no evidence of
human activity though (Stafford 2015). Mesolithic activity has
been recorded at Denham 0.8km northwest of the site (Wessex
Archaeology 2009 p.8, 18) located on brickearth deposits in
which the modern soil had developed. Here the gravels underlay
the brickearth at 0.38m BGL. At Cowley Mill Road the gravels
were recorded at 1.2m BGL (29.60m OD) (Hood 2012).
1.8 The aims and objectives of the monitoring program are
discussed in full in the WSI p.6 (Cotswold Archaeology 2015). In
summary, they are to assess the potential of the archaeological
and palaeoenvironmental strata encountered in the Holocene
sedimentary sequence, and to sample for ecofacts and artefacts
where necessary, thereby improving our understanding of any
human activity on the site.
1.9 The evaluation trenches enabled a closer and more detailed
examination of the in situ strata to be made than was possible
during the borehole survey (Watson 2015). As a result some
conclusions drawn from the borehole evidence have been shown
to be in error and these are remarked upon in the text.
Otherwise mention will be made of the results of the borehole
survey where pertinent.
2. METHODOLOGY
2.1 Eight evaluation trenches were positioned within the site by
archaeologists of Cotswold Archaeology. The position of the
trenches had to respect the day to day use of the Goldberg’s
timber yard; as a result they were placed around the
circumference of the site avoiding the warehouse that occupies
the greater area at the centre: three north to south along the
metalled east bank of the Grand Union Canal and five north to
south parallel to Waterloo Road (Figure 1). Positioning of the
trenches was further complicated by underground services and
Trench 4 was abandoned as a consequence.
2.2 The trenches were excavated by machine. Sediments exposed
were photographed and described on site using standard
geological criteria (Tucker 2011; Jones et al. 1999; Munsell
Color 2000).
Waterloo Wharf, Phase II: Geoarchaeological monitoring of evaluation trenches.
6
Figure 1. Site plan. Canal section: south to north T1, WS05, WS03, T2, T3 LCP01. Waterloo Road section: south to north T9, T8, WS04, T7, WS02, T6, T5, WS01. Evaluation trenches are marked in blue and green and boreholes in black. (Plan courtesy of Cotswold Archaeology).
2.3 Trench locations were surveyed to Ordnance Survey NGR and
Ordnance Datum by hand and using GPS by Cotswold
Archaeology.
2.4 Lithological descriptions were combined with positional
information within a RockWorks database (RockWare 2013).
The RockWorks software was then used to plot the cross
sections presented in Figures 2 and 3. A higher level ranking of
lithological units into formal and informal stratigraphic
members and formations (Modern Made Ground, Alluvium,
Colney Street Gravel Member and London Clay Formation) was
assigned to the data and an isopach map produced using the
Kriging algorithm (Figure 4). This isopach map displays equal
thicknesses of a unit that are represented by bands of the same
colour (True Stratigraphic Thickness map). The thicknesses are
measured perpendicular to the boundaries of the unit. In this
case, the unit is a composite of three lithologies – Made Ground,
Alluvium and Organic Mud – chosen to delineate the sub
Waterloo Wharf, Phase II: Geoarchaeological monitoring of evaluation trenches.
7
surface topography of the Colney Street Gravel Member, the
geological basis over which human occupation has taken place.
2.5 The archive from the site consists of digital records:
photographs of the cores, RockWorks database entries and
lithological descriptions, which are stored at the University of
Winchester. One 0.1 x 0.1 x 0.2m monolith sample from Trench
6 is retained in the ARCA laboratory at the University of
Winchester.
3. EVALUATION TRENCH STRATIGRAPHY
3.0.1 Four major stratigraphic units (formal and informal formations
and members) were distinguished at the site. These are reviewed
below in chronological order (see Figures 2 and 3).
3.1 Colney Street Gravel Member.
3.1.1 Coarse, sandy flint gravels of the Colney Street Gravel Member
were encountered in all the trenches.
3.1.2 In the southeast corner of the site the Colney Street Gravel
Member subcrops at c.30.64m OD in Trench 8 and is
comparable to similar elevations of neighbouring boreholes and
trenches: c.30.30m OD in borehole LCP02 and c.30.55m OD in
Trench 9 (Figure 2). It dips gently north to where it subcrops at
c.29.70m OD in Trench 5 the northernmost trench, where it is
also comparable to a similar elevation of c.29.67m OD in the
neighbouring borehole WS01 (Figure 2). This is a maximum fall
in elevation of c.1m over 60m. There is a slight deviation of this
trend recorded in Trench 3 in the northwest where the gravels
rise and subcrop at c.30.45m OD (Figure 3).
Waterloo Wharf, Phase II: Geoarchaeological monitoring of evaluation trenches.
8
Figure 2. Waterloo Road section south to north. Vertical exaggeration
x5
Waterloo Wharf, Phase II: Geoarchaeological monitoring of evaluation trenches.
9
Figure 3. Canal section south to north. Vertical exaggeration x5.
3.1.3 The stratum is a dark yellowish brown (10 YR 4/6) poorly
sorted, clast supported gravel. The clasts are sub rounded to
angular greyish black and ochre flint that range in size from
coarse sand size to cobble (0.5->64mm). The top c.0.3 m is often
coloured dark grey or black (5 Y 2.5/1) as a result of
penetration of humic acids from overlying reduced alluvium
and/or organic muds. The sand-sized fraction is fine to coarse
quartz and flint grains (field observation). Overlying fine-grained
alluvium appears to have penetrated the top of the open,
skeletal gravels.
3.2 Alluvium.
3.2.1 The Colney Street Gravel Member was unconformably overlain
(i.e. there was an erosive sharp boundary) by fine-grained
minerogenic alluvial sediment in Trenches 1, 2 and 3 (Figure 3).
On the basis of a more detailed examination of the Trench
sections the lithology of the neighbouring boreholes (WS05,
WS03 and LCP01) has been revised and concurs with that of the
Trenches.
3.2.2 The Alluvium was dark greenish grey (5 Y 4/1) with frequent
broad yellowish brown mottles (10 YR 4/3 and 5 Y 4/3). It was
homogenous and structureless and had no clastic content. No in
situ artefactual evidence could be found to confirm the
erroneous belief formed during the borehole survey that this
Waterloo Wharf, Phase II: Geoarchaeological monitoring of evaluation trenches.
10
unit was modern and the result of upcast from the construction
of the Grand Union Canal. Nor was any evidence found of
laminations within the clay tentatively recorded previously in
borehole WS03.
Figure 4. Isopach map
3.2.3 The unit varies little in thickness with an average of c.0.82m
and is confined, except for one instance in borehole WS02, to
the west border of the site along the Grand Union Canal. The
wall of the Canal appeared to have been set against the face of a
construction trench (revetted by a wooden stake in one trench)
cut through the in situ Alluvium.
3.2.4 The presence of Alluvium in borehole WS02 to the east implies
that this unit could well be expected below the footprint of the
warehouses that occupy the centre of the site (Figures 1 and 2).
Otherwise, its general absence to the east is in greater part due
to its complete truncation by modern Made Ground, and in
lesser part (if at all) by the rising elevation of the gravel to the
southeast.
Waterloo Wharf, Phase II: Geoarchaeological monitoring of evaluation trenches.
11
3.2.5 Figure 4 depicts the rise in elevation of the Colney Street Gravel
Member in the southeast of the site. It implies that any fine
grained alluvium, both organic and minerogenic, would lie over
deeper elevations in the area coloured green through to red.
3.2.6 The Alluvium was truncated and overlain by modern Made
Ground in all the trenches in which it occurred.
3.3 Organic Mud
3.3.1 Organic mud was recorded in Trenches 5 and 6 and in borehole
WS01 (Figure 2). It was confined to the north of the site. The
unit was c.0.15m thick (c.29.65m OD in Trench 5 and c.29.80m
OD in WS01) and coloured black (5 Y 2.5/1). Its stratigraphic
position was within the top of the Colney Street Gravel Member
and as a result the unit was a matrix supported gravel of coarse
sand to fine pebble-sized, sub angular black and ochre coloured
flints. In borehole WS01 the Organic Mud sampled was clast
free and c.0.1m thick suggesting that it overlay the gravel at
least in part, a fact not recorded in either of the trenches. The
matrix of Organic Mud contained occasional granular-sized (2-
4mm) plant fibres generally horizontally laid and very
occasionally clumped together. Rare granular-sized grey bivalve
shells were present too. The valves were separated and
frequently fragmented.
3.3.2 The stratigraphic relationship between the Organic Mud and the
Alluvium is unknown as they were not concurrent in any
trench. This is in contrast to the conclusion drawn in the
borehole survey (Watson 2015) where in borehole WS03 there
was slight evidence for alluvium overlying organic mud. Since
this occurrence was not found in Trench 2 positioned beside the
WS03, the relationship in the borehole is discounted here as
erroneous. Furthermore, no Organic Mud was recorded in the
trench.
3.3.3 The Organic Mud was overlain by modern Made Ground.
3.4 Made Ground
3.4.1 ‘Made Ground’ is a term used by the British Geological Survey
to encompass deposits formed as a product of human action
(BGS 2015). In this report all deposits that contained evidence
of modern human action have been grouped together under this
designation.
Waterloo Wharf, Phase II: Geoarchaeological monitoring of evaluation trenches.
12
3.4.2 The Made Ground includes heterogeneous strata often in poorly
defined lenses, that contained fragments of ceramic building
material primarily red or yellowish red brick and mortar (a
section of in situ walling was recorded in Trench 6) (Figures 2
and 3). The deposits were minerogenic. The fine grained
component was dark brown clay that was often mottled by iron
oxide staining as a result of a fluctuating water table. The
clastic component was flint and rarely chalk, present from
granule to cobble size, charcoal grains, fine pebble-sized (4-
8mm) slag, coal and glass fragments. Pebble-sized sherds of
white porcelain were present too. The Made Ground is believed
to date to the modern period (19th century) and truncates the
underlying alluvium but appears to respect the surface of the
Colney Street Gravel member. To the south east of the site the
Made Ground was heavily bioturbated by root and earthworm
action and the brown silt/clay deposits conserved some
granular structure that suggested a topsoil component (Trench
9).
4. ASSESSMENT
4.1 Late Quaternary sedimentary sequence.
4.1.1 The Late Quaternary sedimentary sequence at the site began
with the deposition of the Colney Street Gravel Member on the
braid plain of the precursor to the modern River Colne during
the Late Devensian stage of the Pleistocene.
4.1.2 After the end of the Late-Glacial period and quite possibly with a
hiatus in sedimentation, over bank flooding laid down fine-
grained minerogenic Alluvium to a depth of at least 0.9m.
Further away from the active channel, Organic Mud strata
developed most probably within a wet fen/reedswamp
environment; although it was not possible to identify
characteristic plant remains such as Cyperaceae (sedge family)
or Phragmites (reed). Freshwater bivalves were, however,
present.
4.1.3 The relationship between the Organic Mud and the minerogenic
silt/clay Alluvium is unknown, although it is possible that they
are the same lithofacies with organic sediments developing in
suitable microenvironments to be buried later by flood lain
fines.
Waterloo Wharf, Phase II: Geoarchaeological monitoring of evaluation trenches.
13
4.1.4 There was no evidence of tufa and only ephemeral evidence for
peat, nor was there any evidence of Early Holocene human
action. Modern human action though was responsible for the
truncation of the earlier strata and the deposition of
heterogeneous and artefact rich made ground.
4.2 Comparison with Three Ways Wharf and Riverside Way.
4.2.1 At Scatter A at Three Ways Wharf, orange clay (SU30) is
described as infiltrating the top of the gravels and overlying
them. This is overlain by a grey clay (SU40), itself sealed by
black organic clay (SU50). The sequence is approximately 0.5m
thick (Lewis and Rackham 2011, p.10). At Waterloo Wharf this
same sequence is not evident. There is no evidence for orange
clays infiltrated in the top of the gravels nor any overlying grey
clay. These clay deposits, intervening between the gravels and
the organic stratum, may have been truncated at Waterloo
Wharf, or not deposited because of topographical obstacles or
even incorporated into the organic stratum itself. Their absence
could also imply that the organic stratum at Waterloo Wharf
developed at a greater distance from the stream channel than
that seen at Three Ways Wharf; the intervening clays having
thinned out.
4.2.2 The surface of the black organic clay SU50 at Three Ways Wharf
lies at 31.3m OD (Lewis and Rackham 2011, p.10) and in
Trench 6 the organic mud is at c.30m OD (slightly lower in
WS01 and Trench 5). This is a downstream difference of c.1.3m
over one kilometre. The lower most organic silt recorded at
Riverside Way (about 200m west) subcrops at 29.30m OD and is
overlain by 0.28m of silty peat and black organic clays. These
deposits are all sufficiently similar in lithology and subcrop at a
similar elevation to suggest that they may be coeval and part of
the same lithofacies.
4.2.3 At Waterloo Wharf no direct relationship can be made between
the Alluvium that is characteristic of the west of the site and is
parallel to the Canal, and the Organic Mud stratum
characterising the north of the site (see section 4.1.3).
4.3 Archaeological and palaeoenvironmental potential.
4.3.1 The Colney Street Gravel Member at the site is of LOW to
MODERATE archaeological potential given the likely late
Waterloo Wharf, Phase II: Geoarchaeological monitoring of evaluation trenches.
14
Devensian date of the strata and their formation on a high-
energy braid plain. Human activity on such a plain is unlikely.
There is, however, some potential for the recovery of Final Upper
Palaeolithic lithic and faunal scatters from the upper surface of
gravels where these strata have stabilised and are overlain by
fine-grained strata.
4.3.2 The Colney Street Gravel Member is assessed as being of LOW
to MODERATE palaeoenvironmental potential. Fine-grained
beds which may contain palaeoenvironmental indicators do
occur within such strata but none were identified at the site.
4.3.3 The fine-grained minerogenic alluvial stratum – the Alluvium –
recovered from Trenches 1, 2, 3 and boreholes WS05, WS03,
LCP01 and WS02 is assessed as being of LOW to MODERATE
archaeological potential as flood plains have been environments
of human occupation in the past.
4.3.4 The Alluvium is assessed as being of LOW palaeoenvironmental
potential. Palaeoenvironmental indicators may be variably
preserved in such clastic sediments, however, the source of
microbiological remains may be difficult to determine (i.e. the
particles are allochthonous).
4.3.5 The Organic Mud stratum recovered from WS01, and Trenches
5 and 6 is assessed as being of LOW to MODERATE
archaeological potential. These strata formed in a back swamp
environment in which human activity would likely have been
sporadic at most; stray finds are a possibility though.
4.3.6 The Organic Mud stratum has a HIGH palaeoenvironmental
potential as palaeoenvironmental indicators are likely to be well-
preserved (macroscopic biological remains were noted).
4.3.7 The Made Ground strata recorded in all the trenches is modern
and has NO palaeoenvironmental potential nor premodern
archaeological potential.
5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
5.1 ARCA would like to thank Simon Carlyle and Ralph Brown of
Cotswold Archaeology and Eleanor Standley of the University of
Oxford for their help during this phase of the project.
Waterloo Wharf, Phase II: Geoarchaeological monitoring of evaluation trenches.
15
6. BIBLIOGRAPHY
BGS (2015) British Geological Survey lexicon of named rock units. http://www.bgs.ac.uk/lexicon/ (Accessed 19 August 2015).
Cotswold Archaeology (2015) Waterloo Wharf Uxbridge London Borough Of Hillingdon: Written Scheme of Investigation for a Geoarchaeological Monitoring Exercise. Unpublished document. CA Project 660572. Cotswold Archaeology, Milton Keynes
Gibbard, P.L. (1985) The Pleistocene History of the Middle Thames Valley. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Grant, M.J., Stevens, C.J., Whitehouse, N.J., Norcott, D., Macphail, R.I., Langdon, C., Cameron, N., Barnett, C., Langdon, P.G., Crowder, J., Mulhall, N., Attree, K., Leivers, M., Greatorex, R., Ellis, C. (2014) ‘A palaeoenvironmental context for Terminal Upper Palaeolithic and Mesolithic activity in the Colne Valley: Offsite records contemporary with occupation at Three Ways Wharf, Uxbridge’. Environmental Archaeology 19 (2): 131-152.
Hood, A. (2012) Land South of Cowley Mill Road, Uxbridge: Archaeological Evaluation. Unpublished report. Foundations Archaeology
Jones, A.P., Tucker, M.E. and Hart, J.K. (1999) ‘Guidelines and
recommendations’. In Jones, A.P., Tucker, M.E. and Hart, J.K.
(Eds.) The description and analysis of Quaternary stratigraphic
field sections. Quaternary Research Association technical guide
7, London, 27-76.
Lewis, J.S.C. and Rackham, J. (2011) Three Ways Wharf, Uxbridge: A
Lateglacial and Early Holocene hunter-gatherer site in the Colne
valley. MOLA Monograph 51. Museum of London Archaeology,
London.
Makaske, B. (2001) ‘Anastomosing rivers: a review of their
classification, origin and sedimentary products’. Earth Science
Reviews 53, 149-196.
MoLAS (2002) The former Sanderson site, Oxford Road, Denham: an
archaeological evaluation report. Unpublished report, MoLAS,
London.
MoLAS (2006) The former Sanderson site, Oxford Road, Denham UB9:
An archaeological post-excavation assessment and updated
project design. Unpublished report, MoLAS, London.
Munsell Color (2000) Munsell soil color charts. Munsell Color, New
Windsor (NY).
Waterloo Wharf, Phase II: Geoarchaeological monitoring of evaluation trenches.
16
Stafford, Elizabeth (2015) Phase 500 Riverside Way Uxbridge. Client
Report. Unpublished.
Trevarthan, M and Manning, A (2009) Preferred Area 4, Denham,
Buckinghamshire. Unpublished Report, Wessex Archaeology
Tucker, M.E. (2011) Sedimentary rocks in the field. Wiley, Chichester.
Watson, N. M. (2015) Waterloo Wharf, Uxbridge: geoarchaeological
monitoring of boreholes. Unpublished ARCA Report 1516-3.
University of Winchester.
Waterloo Wharf, Phase II: Geoarchaeological monitoring of evaluation trenches.
17
APPENDIX 1: EVALUATION TRENCH LOGS
Location Depth below ground
level (from/to)
Type Description
Trench 1
0.00 0.30 Made ground Concrete and sub base.
0.30 1.14 Silt/clay 5 Y 4/1 Dark grey with frequent mottles of 10
YR 4/3 Dark yellowish brown and 5 Y 4/3
Olive compact silt/clay. Structure less.
(Alluvium). Sharp boundary to:
1.14 1.38 Flint gravel 5 Y 4/2 Olive grey poorly sorted, clast
supported flint gravel. Angular to sub-rounded
black and ochre coloured flints. Silt/clay
matrix with frequent coarse-sand-sized
mineral grains (flint and quartz). Becoming 10
YR 4/4 Dark yellowish brown.
Trench 2
0.00 0.40 Made ground Concrete and sub base.
0.40 1.26 Silt/clay 5 Y 4/1 Dark grey with frequent mottles of 10
YR 4/3 Dark yellowish brown and 5 Y 4/3
Olive compact silt/clay. Structureless.
(Alluvium). Sharp boundary to:
1.26 1.46 Flint gravel 5 Y 4/2 Olive grey poorly sorted, clast
supported flint gravel. Angular to sub-rounded
black and ochre coloured flints. Silt/clay
matrix with frequent coarse-sand-sized
mineral grains (flint and quartz).
Waterloo Wharf, Phase II: Geoarchaeological monitoring of evaluation trenches.
18
Location Depth below ground
level (from/to)
Type Description
Trench 3
0.00 0.30 Made ground Concrete and sub base.
0.30 1.05 Silt/clay 5 Y 4/1 Dark grey with frequent mottles of 10
YR 4/3 Dark yellowish brown and 5 Y 4/3
Olive compact silt/clay. Structureless.
(Alluvium). Sharp boundary to:
1.05 1.25 Flint gravel 5 Y 4/2 Olive grey poorly sorted, clast
supported flint gravel. Angular to sub-
rounded black and ochre coloured flints.
Silt/clay matrix with frequent coarse-sand-
sized mineral grains (flint and quartz).
Becoming 10 YR 4/4 Dark yellowish brown
with depth.
Trench 5
0.00 0.36 Made ground Concrete and sub base.
0.36 1.45 Made ground 10 YR 5/4 yellowish brown stiff silt/clay
mixed with 10 YR 4/1 Dark grey silt/clay with
granular to pebble-sized fragments of brick,
sub angular flint, slag, cbm, chalk and
charcoal in interdigitating lenses and layers.
Lens of chalk. (Modern Made ground). Sharp
boundary to:
Waterloo Wharf, Phase II: Geoarchaeological monitoring of evaluation trenches.
19
Location Depth below ground
level (from/to)
Type Description
Trench 5
1.45 1.60 Organic mud 5 Y 2.5/1 Black matrix supported gravel of
coarse sand to fine pebble-sized, sub angular
black and ochre coloured flints. Matrix of
organic mud with rare to occasional granular-
sized plant fibres. Rare granular-sized bivalve
shells, separated and frequently fragmented.
1.60 1.80 Flint gravel 5 Y 2.1/1 Black poorly sorted, clast supported
flint gravel. Black humic acids infiltrating top
of gravel deposit. Angular to sub-rounded
black and ochre coloured flints. Silt/clay
matrix with frequent coarse-sand-sized
mineral grains (flint and quartz).
Trench 6
0.00 1.40 Made ground Modern made ground: Tarmac and concrete
sealing laid brick and mortar wall over coarse
diamict of reworked ?London Clay and
fragmented bricks. Sharp boundary to:
1.40 1.55 Organic mud 5 Y 2.5/1 Black matrix supported gravel of
coarse sand to fine pebble-sized, sub angular
black and ochre coloured flints. Matrix of
organic mud with rare to occasional granular-
sized plant fibres. Rare granular-sized bivalve
shell, separated and frequently fragmented.
Small monolith sample taken. CA take 10l+
samples.
Waterloo Wharf, Phase II: Geoarchaeological monitoring of evaluation trenches.
20
Location Depth below ground
level (from/to)
Type Description
Trench 6 1.55 1.75 Flint gravel 5 Y 2.5/1 Black poorly sorted, clast supported
flint gravel. Black humic acids infiltrating top
of gravel deposit. Angular to sub-rounded
black and ochre coloured flints. Silt/clay
matrix with frequent coarse-sand-sized
mineral grains (flint and quartz).
Trench 7
0.00 0.32 Made ground Concrete and black diamict (charcoal and coal)
sub base.
0.32 0.52 Made ground 10 YR 4/3 Brown diamict of brick fragments.
(Modern Made Ground). Sharp boundary to:
0.52 1.22 Made ground 10 YR 3/1 Very dark grey silt/clay with
frequent granular to fine pebble-sized flint,
cbm (white porcelain), slag and mortar.
Occasional granules of charcoal. Bioturbated
by roots. (Modern Made Ground). Sharp
boundary to:
1.22 1.42 Flint gravel 10 YR 3/3 Dark brown and 10 YR 4/4 Dark
yellowish brown poorly sorted, clast supported
flint gravel. Angular to sub-rounded black
and ochre coloured flints. Silt/clay matrix with
frequent coarse sand-sized mineral grains
(flint and quartz).
Waterloo Wharf, Phase II: Geoarchaeological monitoring of evaluation trenches.
21
Location Depth below ground
level (from/to)
Type Description
Trench 8
0.00 0.30 Made ground Concrete and sub base.
0.30 0.80 Made ground 10 YR 3/1 Very dark grey friable and
heterogeneous diamict of frequent granular to
coarse pebble-sized clasts of brick and flint
and frequent granular to fine pebble-sized
charcoal, coal, glass and slag. Heavily
bioturbated by roots and earthworms. (Modern
Made Ground). Sharp boundary to:
0.80 1.00 Flint gravel 10 YR 3/3 Dark brown and 10 YR 4/4 Dark
yellowish brown poorly sorted, clast supported
flint gravel. Angular to sub-rounded black
and ochre coloured flints. Silt/clay matrix with
frequent coarse sand-sized mineral grains
(flint and quartz). Some bioturbation by roots.
Trench 9
0.00 0.30 Made ground Concrete and sub base.
0.30 0.95 Made ground 10 YR 3/1 Very dark grey heterogeneous
diamict of occasional granular to coarse
pebble-sized clasts of brick and flint and
occasional granular to fine pebble-sized
charcoal, coal, and slag. Porcelain fragment.
Some granular crumb structure. Heavily
bioturbated by roots and earthworms.
(?Agricultural soil. Modern Made Ground).
Sharp boundary to:
Waterloo Wharf, Phase II: Geoarchaeological monitoring of evaluation trenches.
22
Location Depth below ground
level (from/to)
Type Description
Trench 9 0.95 1.15 Flint gravel 10 YR 3/3 Dark brown and 10 YR 4/4 Dark
yellowish brown poorly sorted, clast supported
flint gravel. Angular to sub-rounded black
and ochre coloured flints. Silt/clay matrix with
frequent coarse sand-sized mineral grains
(flint and quartz). Some bioturbation by roots.