West Village Commons

West Village Commons

Patrick MorganLighting/ElectricalApril 13, 2011

Scope of Work Lighting Redesign

Grand Stair and Lobby HRL Suite Multi-Purpose Space Roof Terrace Study Lounge

Electrical Depths DC Power Distribution SKM Analysis

Daylighting Analysis (MAE) Thermal Load Analysis

(Breadth 1) Structural Analysis (Breadth

2)

Rendering Courtesy GWWO Inc.

Presentation Overview Project Overview Towson Vision Design Concept Study Lounge

Lighting Redesign Connections Daylighting (MAE) Thermal Load Analysis (Breadth)

HRL Suite Lighting Redesign DC Power Distribution (Elec.

Depth) Summary

Project Overview

Location: Towson, Maryland Size: 86,339 sq. ft. Main Function:

University Commons Building Levels Above Grade: 4 Cost: $30,528,000 Construction Dates:

July 15, 2009 to May 31, 2011 Minimum Silver LEED Rating

Overview

Rendering Courtesy GWWO Inc.

N

OverviewTowson VisionDesign ConceptStudy Lounge•Lighting•Daylighting•ThermalHRL Suite•Lighting•DC PowerSummary

Project Team Architect: GWWO Inc./Architects

Civil Engineer: Site Resources

Construction Manager: Barton Malow

Food Service Consultant: Ricca Newmark Design

Geotechnical Engineer: Schnabel Engineers

Interior Design Consultant: PLDA

Landscape Architect: Maham Rykiel Associates

Lighting Designer: Bruce Dunlop Lighting Design, LCC.

MEP Engineers: James Posey Associates, Inc.

Structural Engineer: Restl Designers

Overview

N

Towson Vision

Master Plan Guiding Principles:

•Define Clear Edges and Centers

•Develop a Sustainable Campus

Student Life:

•Increase on-campus housing and physical connections to create

a more “walk able” and active campus.

•Provide more outdoor recreation and green space

Vision

N

Paca House

Towson Run Apartments

West Village Residence Area


Architectural Features

Concept

Design ConceptGlass Façade

Clear, Fritted, Translucent

Building Texture

Stone, Wood

Cloud Ceiling

Daylighting Between the Clouds

Signature Space for Students

Create the “Wow” factor from the outside

Private and Active Environment

Give students a feeling they will have

nowhere else

Connect with the Architectural

Features


Architectural Features

Signature Space for Students

Create the “Wow” factor from the outside

Private and Active Environment

Give students a feeling they will have

nowhere else

Connect with the Architectural

Features

Concept

Glass Façade

Clear, Fritted, Translucent

Building Texture

Stone, Wood

Cloud Ceiling

Starlight Through the Clouds

Design Concept

Location Features

Continual Views of the Outdoors

Cloud Ceiling

Textured Surfaces

Connections

Mimics the Lobby

Pre-function for Multi-Purpose space

Main Access to Roof Terrace

Lounge

Third Floor

Study Lounge

Fourth Floor

Space Layout

Level 3/4

Daytime RenderingCourtesy GWWO Inc./Architects


Lounge

Luminaire Selection Layout Very Important

Daylight Integration

Psychological Feeling: Public vs. Private

Appearance of the Space

Modeling of Faces and Objects

Lighting Power Density: 1.2 W/ sq. ft.

Important

Horizontal Illuminance – 30 fc, 10 fc

Controls

Design Criteria

S2: Direct Louvered Pendant

S3: Fluorescent Wall Graze

L2: Surface Mounted CFL Downlight

L1: Recessed CFL Downlight

Third Floor Fourth Floor

Lounge

Luminaire Selection Layout Very Important

Daylight Integration

Psychological Feeling: Public vs. Private

Appearance of the Space

Modeling of Faces and Objects

Lighting Power Density: 1.2 W/ sq. ft.

Important

Horizontal Illuminance – 30 fc, 10 fc

Controls

Design Criteria

S1: 2’ RGB LED

L1: 2.5” Recessed LED Downlight

Third Floor Fourth Floor

Lounge

Illuminance at the Work plane: General Seating Under Balcony Grazed Wall

Black: 35 fc, Blue: 30 fc, Green: 25 fc, Red: 20 fc

General Seating: 29.12 fc

Balcony: 26.82 fc

Under Balcony: 25.16 fc

Actual LPD: 1.20 W/sq. ft. (with

decorative)

Design Performance

Lounge

Illuminance at the Work plane: General Seating

Exterior Cloud Ceiling with star concept

General Seating: 29.12 fc

Balcony: 26.82 fc

Under Balcony: 25.16 fc

Actual LPD: 1.20 W/sq. ft. (with

decorative)

Design Performance

Black: 35 fc, Blue: 30 fc, Green: 25 fc, Red: 20 fc

Grand Stair Lounge

Roof Terrace Exterior

Northeast Perspective Southwest Perspective Exterior View from Entrance

Grand Stair Lounge

Roof Terrace Exterior

Northeast Perspective Southwest Perspective Southeast Perspective from Quad

Daylight

Original Glazing Properties

Daylighting Analysis (MAE)

Utilize Glass Façade

Glazing Change to Preserve Views

Shading System to Reduce Direct

Glare and Control Light Levels

Dim Under Balcony and Balcony

Lighting

Glazing Type SHGC Transmittance Reflectance

GL-3 Clear 0.38 70% 11%

GL-4 Translucent 0.37 60% 12%

GL-5 Frit 0.30 44% 22%


East FacadeWest FacadeNorth Facade

Daylight

Profile Angles

Orange: 10 ft., Purple: Halfway, Red: Across the Space

Overcast Clear Sky

Main Study Area 244.74 349.94

Covered Area 83.12 137.89

Balcony 92.44 220.63

Overcast Clear Sky

Main Study Area 187 254

Covered Area 27.9 67.3

Balcony 56.4 136







Lighting

Average Work-plane Illuminance

Minimum Work-plane Illuminance

Daylight

Continuous Daylight Autonomy






Lighting


Daylight Autonomy at 2000 lux

Tv = 9%, Openness = 3%

NN

Daylight

Critical Point






Lighting


Dimming Savings Level (kWh)

Base Optimal Algorithm Signal

January 4.14 3.25 3.21 0.92February 113.46 76.36 75.16 38.3

March 97.52 57.3 56.78 70.74

April 121.43 66.37 63.17 58.25

May 99.35 52.1 49.59 49.75

June 54.81 23.34 21.43 33.37

July 54.81 23.92 21.39 33.41

August 13.27 6.87 6.23 7.04

September 121.74 70.66 68.58 53.16

October 125.57 77.58 77.36 48.21

November 109.63 78.75 79.07 30.56December 85.09 63.56 64.72 20.37

1000.86 600.1 586.74 414.12N

Thermal

ASHRAE Radiant Time Series Method

Based on Monthly Design Averages

Profile Angles

Applies SHGC correction factors

Reference Glass

Accounts for shading in thermal

loading

Radiative Reduction: 100%, 46%

Thermal Load Analysis (Mech. Breadth)

IAC Factor Chart


Location and Floor PlanFeatures

Open Office

Perimeter Offices

Completely Interior Space

Functions

Operates 9 am to 5 pm

Used by permanent and student

employees

HRL Suite

HRL Suite Details

Level 3

Layout

Partitions

Perimeter Glazing


F1: Direct/Indirect Pendant

Luminaire Selection

Very Important

Glare, Direct and Reflected

Source/Task/Eye Geometry

Power Density: 1.1 W/ sq. ft.

Important

Horizontal Illuminance – 50 fc

Psychological Impression

Design Criteria

F2: Recessed LED Downlight

F3: 6” LED Pendant, School Color

LayoutHRL Suite

HRL Suite

Illuminance at the work plane

Office Overview Reception Counter

Actual LPD: 1.23 W/ sq. ft.

Desk Illuminance : 45 to 55 fc

Work Counter Illuminance: 47

fc

Reception Counter Illuminance:

34 fc

Design Performance

North Section

Overview

Desk Illuminance

Black: 55 fc, Blue: 50 fc, Green: 45 fc, Red:

40 fc

Electrical

Design for Direct Coupling

Reduced Power Density: 0.93 W/

sq. ft.

Work plane Illuminance: 35 fc

0.75 Ballast Factor for two lamp

Smaller Required PV Array

Integrated into Ceiling Grid

DC Power Distribution

EMerge Diagram Integrated Ceiling Grid


Electrical

DC Power Consumption



sq. ft.






AC Power Consumption

Electrical

DC Array Sizing



sq. ft.






AC Array Evaluation

Summary

Lighting:•The spaces draw students in while providing a relaxing and open

experience and meeting IESNA and ASHRAE standards.

Daylighting

•The Study Lounge offers quality daylight levels throughout the

day.

Thermal Analysis

•The additional shades reduce the solar load and overall

cooling load of the study lounge.

Electrical

•Direct Coupling is more effective then inverter based

systems.

Acknowledgments

AE Advisors and Professors

James Posey Associates

GWWO Inc./Architects

Barton Malow

AE Friends and Family

Questions?

Documents

West Village Commons