2
WHAT DO YOU WANT? From time t o time since I hove been an associate member of the A- merican bssociation of Public Eealth Dentists, the question has been brought up as to who shall be active members of tke A.A.P.H.D. and who shall be associate members. Some of the state dental directors who are members of tho association are very positive that the active membership should be limited to state dental directors only, Before permanently adopting euch a policy of aeolusion and exclusion, why not review the past, present, and futuro of the dental health movement? The writer has been a municipal dental director only since 1933, and at that time the state directors were in a minority. men the Social Security program was established and most of' the present state dental di- rector positions were created, there were many good municipal dental pro- grams already in operation4 The U,S, Publio Health Servi.ce had its con- sulting service, but that was only skeletal in nature at that time, Consequently, the new state direc- tors sought all the dental health information on programs from all the sources they could find in the coun- try, Tho interesting pnrt of the early stewardship of these new s t a t e den- tal directors was thnt most of their detailed dentnl health information on l o c a l programs had t o corn from the local areas themselves4 Chances are thnt many local direotors like myself reoeived many informational requests from these new state direc- tors, which were always gladly ful- filled. The U.S4 P u b l i c Health Ser- vice was always on hand for informa- tion in establishing policies and administrative suggestions, but the "proof of the pudding" in any type of hetilth work lies in the local community. In sunmine; up the situation, it seems that the isolation of any one group of dental health personre1 without =king provision for regular oontact i n assembly meetings and 8- quality in societies only acts as a stymie for the good of the general movenent. The A,DA and the U,S, Public Health Service continually send out literature camnding the policy of doing everything at a lacar lovol. The denaely populated areas tire the proving grounds of the local level programs, and the only way in which the state directors and the U, S. Public Health Service people dis- cover them is through regular contact with these large local communities , The laws allow large cities to set up independent health units, and ne- cessity makes it mandatory that lo- cal health units be self-sufficient in many phases of their work, In addition, local health people are usually so busy with their own problems that their state and na- tional contacts are limited to those of necessity only. My experience in the American Publio Henlth Associa- tion has been such thn.t the more state, national, and locnl dental public health people I have contact with, the better able I am to go back and do A good Job in ny Iooal community4 This principle also works in reverse, because the state dental directors cannot know all about lo- cal programs unless they come in contcct regularly with the personnel doing the work. If state and federal men do not enter the local communi- ties and seek information, chances are they will nut get any of the in- formation unless they aomB in contact

WHAT DO YOU WANT?

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: WHAT DO YOU WANT?

WHAT DO YOU WANT?

From time t o time s ince I hove been an a s soc ia t e member of t h e A- merican bs soc ia t ion of Public Eealth Dent i s t s , t h e question has been brought up as t o who s h a l l be ac t ive members of t k e A.A.P.H.D. and who s h a l l be assoc ia te members. Some of t h e s t a t e dental d i r e c t o r s who are members of tho assoc ia t ion are very pos i t ive t h a t t he ac t ive membership should be l imi ted t o s t a t e denta l d i r ec to r s only, Before permanently adopting euch a pol icy of aeolusion and exclusion, why not review t h e pas t , present, and futuro of t h e dental hea l th movement?

The w r i t e r has been a municipal dental d i r e c t o r only s ince 1933, and a t t h a t time the s t a t e d i r ec to r s were in a minority. m e n the Socia l Secur i ty program was es tab l i shed and most of' the present s t a t e dental di- r ec to r pos i t ions were created, t he re were many good municipal denta l pro- grams a l ready i n operation4 The U,S, Publio Health Servi.ce had i t s con- s u l t i n g serv ice , but t h a t was only s k e l e t a l i n nature a t t h a t time, Consequently, the new s t a t e direc- t o r s sought a l l t h e dental hea l th information on programs from a l l t h e sources they could f ind i n the coun- t r y ,

Tho i n t e r e s t i n g pnrt of t he early stewardship of these new s t a t e den- t a l d i r ec to r s was t h n t most of t h e i r de t a i l ed dentnl hea l th information on l o c a l programs had t o corn from the l o c a l a reas themselves4 Chances a r e t h n t many l o c a l d i r eo to r s l i k e myself reoeived many informational requests from t hese new s t a t e direc- tors, which were always gladly f u l - f i l l e d . The U.S4 Public Heal th Ser- v ice was always on hand for informa- t i o n i n e s t ab l i sh ing p o l i c i e s and administrative suggestions, but the

"proof of the pudding" i n any type of hetilth work l i e s i n the local community.

I n sunmine; up t h e situation, it seems t h a t t he i s o l a t i o n of any one group of den ta l h e a l t h personre1 without =king provision f o r regular oontact i n assembly meetings and 8-

q u a l i t y i n s o c i e t i e s only ac ts as a stymie for the good of t h e general movenent. The A , D A and the U,S, Public Health Service cont inua l ly send out l i t e r a t u r e c a m n d i n g t h e po l i cy of doing everything a t a lacar lovol. The denaely populated areas tire the proving grounds of t h e l o c a l level programs, and the only way i n which the s t a t e d i r e c t o r s and the U, S. Public Health Service people d i s - cover them i s through regular contact with these la rge loca l communities , The laws allow large c i t i e s t o s e t up independent hea l th units, and ne- c e s s i t y makes it mandatory t h a t lo - cal hea l th units be s e l f - s u f f i c i e n t i n many phases of t h e i r work,

In addi t ion , l o c a l hea l th people are usua l ly so busy wi th t h e i r own problems that t h e i r state and na- t i o n a l contacts a re l imi ted t o those o f necess i ty only. My experience i n the American Publio Henlth Associa- t i o n has been such thn.t t h e more s t a t e , na t iona l , and locnl denta l public h e a l t h people I have contact with, the b e t t e r able I a m t o go back and do A good Job in ny Iooal community4 This pr inc ip l e a l s o works i n reverse , because t h e s t a t e dental d i r e c t o r s cannot know all about lo - ca l programs unless t h e y come i n contcct r egu la r ly with the personnel doing the work. If s t a t e and f ede ra l men do not e n t e r t h e l o c a l communi- ties and seek information, chances are t hey w i l l nut ge t any of the in- formation unless t hey aomB in contact

Page 2: WHAT DO YOU WANT?

August, 1946 - 204 WEAT DO YOU WANT?

with t h e l o c a l personnel a t conven- t i o n s and meetings,

In conclusion, I wish t o s t a t e t h a t t h i s d i s s e r t a t i o n is no t i n t h e na ture of a complaint agahnat any p d i c y . I t is an honest a t tempt t o eva lua te our dent31 h e s l t h movement. There must be unity of purpose, in- terchange of i deas , and honest-to- goodness elbow-rubbing t o achieve good programs and results i n any cause. If the k.A.P.H.3, chooses t o l i m i t a c t i v e membership t o s t a t e d i - r e c t o r s and U.S. Publ ia Heclth Ser- v i ce parsonnel only, t h a t i s t h e i r business and p rob lem However, such a c t i o n would au tomat i ca l ly l i m i t nc- t i v i t y t o t hose few workers and bo- come s e l f - l i m i t e d i n func t ion and scope. A t t h i s time my memory goes back t o t h e Gunn-Platt r epor t on Voluntary Heal th Agenaiss , which shows how independent 1 y , ex t rava g a d - ly , and i n e f f e c t i v e l y agencies can opera te unless s t r o n g coord ina t ion

is e s t a b l i s h e d and c a r r i e d out.

There i s n o t any n a t i o n a l nssocia- t i o n a t p r e s e n t which makes provi- sion f o r t h e ga the r ing t o g e t h e r of a l l the d e n t a l h e n l t h personnel cer- r y k g on programs i n t h e nat ion. The A.A.P.H.D. i s t h e only group of its kind a t present . If it f e e l s t ha t t h e o rgan iza t ion should remain i n i t s present oategory, t h e r e is no doubt t h a t ano the r den ta l s o c i e t y will s o m day s p r i n g up t o t a k e ca re of t h e balance of t h e d e n t a l pub l i c h e n l t h workers. If t h i s occurs , it w i l l be j u s t ano the r s o c i e t y w i t h a g r e a t dea l of d u p l i c a t i o n of effort and, consequent ly , less e f f iofency. The American Pub l i c Henl th kssoc ia- t i o n so lved t h i s problem some time ago and has been s t r o n g e r and b e t t e r organized e v e r s ince . Strange t o s a y , one can always learn something from another8

--L.A. Gerlach

THE EPI DEMI OLOGY OF "QWZSTI OED1 I RE k LLERGY"

My own p e c u l i a r r e a c t i o n , when I was a s ta te den ta l d i r e c t o r , t o t h e unending barrage of quo s t ionna i r e s which wns f i r e d a t me, cnused me t o suspec t t h a t eve.ntually I might be- corn a l l e r g i c t o them, w i t h n r e su l - t a n t v i b l e n t r e a c t i o n t o subsequent exposuresc Fortunately ( o r unfortu- n a t e l y ) , I changed ol imates before I beoame h igh ly s e n s i t i z e d , and I have s i n c e enjoyed a p a r t i a l , acqui red immunity t o ques t ionnai res ,

A more r ecen t experience , however, has convinced me t h a t most pub l i c

h e a l t h d e n t i s t s have con t rhc ted ques t ionnai re a l l e rgy" and t h a t

some ere prone t o t h e v i o l e n t ?em- t i o n s which I suspec ted might occur a f t e r prolonged exposure, I t so hap- pened, i n connect ion w i t h a paper I m s w r i t i n g , t h a t I was on t h e d i s - pensing end of a ques t ionna i r e on d e n t a l t r ea tmen t i n pub l i c h e a l t h d e n t i s t r y , which I compiled and s e n t t o a l l the s t a t e and municipal den- tal d i r e c t o r s . The r e s u l t s , which could h a r d l y be c a l l e d explos ive , are shown i n t h e table on t h e fol- lowing page;

(1