Upload
lykien
View
223
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Fermentation Science at Oregon State University
Thomas H. Shellhammer
Professor of Food Science Nor’Wester Professor of Fermentation Science
Where is Oregon?
Oregon State University
Oregon State University
•! Formerly Oregon Agricultural College •! 27,000 students •! Forestry, Oceanography, Agriculture
Engineering, Linus Pauling Institute
Food Science & Technology
OSU Seafood Laboratory - Astoria
Wiegand Hall - Corvallis
Food Innovation Center - Portland
B.S. Degree in Food Science and Technology !! Food Science 26% !! Fermentation Science 62% !! Enology & Viticulture 12%
OSU Food Science Undergraduate Degree Program
Undergraduate enrollment
!"
#!"
$!!"
$#!"
%!!"
%#!"
$&&#" $&&'" $&&(" $&&)" $&&&" %!!!" %!!$" %!!%" %!!*" %!!+" %!!#" %!!'" %!!(" %!!)" %!!&" %!$!" %!$$" %!$%" %!$*"
!"#$%%&
'"()
*+,-'&.+)/',#)01'2.""."2).")3,%%4)
Changing the future. Right here. Right now.
Tapping talent:
With one of the nation’s only teaching breweries and an endowed chair in fermentation science, OSU o�ers students the opportunity to develop new brews while they learn the subtle chemistry of taste and the innovations of business. Jobs on tap.
Agriculture is where food begins. Learn more at agsci.oregonstate.edu/foodies
Oregon bubbles to the top of the craft beer industry
Training students to be brewers
Photo’s courtesy of Lynn Ketchum
Training students to be brewers
Photo’s courtesy of Lynn Ketchum
OSU Pilot Brewery 2 BBL brewhouse, 6 CCV
Photo’s courtesy of Steve Werblow
OSU Pilot Brewery Packaging Single head filler + tunnel pasteurizer
Photo’s courtesy of Chris Meuller
OSU Minimalter
Photo’s courtesy of Lynn Ketchum
OSU Fermentation Science
Employers of OSU Ferm. Sci. Grads
Anheuser-Busch MillerCoors Boston Beer Company BridgePort Brewing Boulevard Brewing Deschutes Brewery Full Sail Brewing McMenamins Stone Brewing Widmer Brothers Brewing
Gallo Winery (Sonoma Valley, CA)
St. Michele Winery Hogue Cellars King Estate Winery Corsair Distillery Rogue Spirits Tillamook County Creamery Rogue Creamery
Fermentation Science at OSU
•! Brewing – Tom Shellhammer •! Barley breeding & malting – Pat Hayes •! Hops breeding – Shaun Townsend & John Henning •! Hops pathology – Dave Gent •! Hops & health – Fred Stevens •! Wine – James Osborne, Elizabeth Tomasino •! Viticulture – Patti Skinkis. Laurent Deluc, Walt Mahaffe •! Specialty cheeses – Lisbeth Goddik •! Cereals chemistry & bread – Andrew Ross
Fermentation Science at OSU
New Positions
•! Distillation professor •! Brewing microbiologist professor •! Instructor/Advisor – Fermentation Science
Beer Analytics May 1, June 16 – 20 Beer Proficiency July 15 – 18
Craft Brewery Startup April, May, September Cidery Startup April, May 12 – 16
pace.oregonstate.edu/beer
PACE - Beer Analytics
Beer Analytics Online + Hands-on learning in the lab and pilot brewery
Beer Analytics Engage with industry experts – Fred Strachan, Sierra Nevada
Beer Analytics Learn about hops and OSU’s hop breeding facilities
Beer Analytics Learn about barley/malt and OSU’s barley breeding facilities
Beer Analytics May 1, June 16 – 20 Beer Proficiency July 15 – 18
Craft Brewery Startup April, May, September Cidery Startup April, May 12 – 16
pace.oregonstate.edu/beer
Close connection to the brewing industry
•! MBAA District NW meetings – 200-300 attendees •! 1st International Brewing Symposium, 2007
Hop Flavor and Aroma in Beer •! Hop Research Council
OSU Pilot Brewery – Beer Development
Hops humulus lupulus
OSU has a long connection to hops •! 1932
–! Oregon largest hop producing region in the world with 34,594 acres (14,000 ha)
–! Downy Mildew discovered in Oregon hop yards –! U.S. Department of Agriculture establishes hop breeding
program
•! 1979 –! Hop Research Council created
•! 1996 –! Fermentation Science track created
within Dept of Food Science
Hop breeding at OSU Hop breeding at OSU
Public hop varieties released by USDA/OSU
Bianca Cascade Columbia Comet Crystal Horizon Liberty Mt. Rainier Mt. Hood
Newport Nugget Santiam Sterling Sunbeam Teamaker Ultra Willamette
Cascade Hop & Craft Brewing
Shellhammer Lab Hops research, recent activity
•! Isomerization kinetics •! Bitterness research
–! Native and reduced iso-alpha acids –! Hop-derived polyphenols –! Impact, time-intensity, quality
•! Foam studies –! Reduced iso’s
•! Flavor stability –! Hop-derived polyphenols –! Hop acids
Bitt
erne
ss In
tens
ity!
Time!tmax!
Imax!Area!
Duration!
Sensory testing Consumer as well as trained panel
Widmer Brewing Company
•! Preference Mapping of Widmer Products: Identification of Product Attributes, Consumer Preferences and Psychographics McDaniels, Orth, Shellhammer – 2002
•! Trained panel (12) + Consumers (~300)
•! Part of development efforts leading to Drop Top Amber Ale
Survey results using professional brewers Hop contributions to beer flavor
Cascade Citra
,-./0112""
Simcoe®
34--05""
Chinook
671829"3.4:09""
;<=>?"<214-@48A=2-.B.CDA>748""
,B5.94-""
E7/D4178""
E.117/5.4"=.4/48""
F0117904-""
35G/0.9"H21I09J""
,K2112""
64JJ75""
H.179.""
L.108.I7M""N011.-7O7"
L7/17";P3"2/0J09?""
62/5B7/9"Q/7C7/""
3K.15"3717R5""E.117/5.4"=/.I0S29""
=7O9.9J7/""
Q/7C7/T8"H21I""
Hallertau MittleFreuh
Saaz
L7/17";H7/-.9"2/0J09?""
East Kent Golding
F.J94-""
<14857/""
3K.157/""
U4JJ17""
U12/.1"
U/405G"=/2K0R.1"V/405"<05/48"E7/@.1"
3K0RG"
H/.88G"N22IG"
W9029AH./10R"
F485G"
X7.5B7/"[email protected]"
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
Y'" Y#" Y+" Y*" Y%" Y$" !" $" %" *" +" #" '"
D2
(20.
86 %
)
D1 (32.90 %)
5.6%$()0,7'8)9:),"-)9;<)=>?@A)B4),C'#)D,#.&,7)#$(,E$")
Shellhammer Lab Hops research, current projects
•! Investigating the sources of citrus aroma/flavor from hops
•! Hop harvest maturity influences on oil quality
•! Basic studies on dry hopping •! How hops affect beer flavor
stability •! New methods for assessing
beer bitterness
Questions?
Shellhammer Lab Hops research, current projects
•! Investigating the sources of citrus aroma/flavor from hops
•! Hop harvest maturity influences on oil quality
•! Basic studies on dry hopping •! How hops affect beer flavor
stability •! New methods for assessing
beer bitterness
Hop maturity and its impact on hop oil composition
Daniel Sharp Thomas H. Shellhammer
Shaun Townsend Michael Qian
Photo by: Jim Solberg, Indie Hops
Hop Oil Composition
Schönberger, C.; Kostelecky, T. 125th Anniversary Review: The Role of Hops in Brewing. J. Inst. Brew 2011, 117, 259–267.
Hop Oil Composition
Schönberger, C.; Kostelecky, T. 125th Anniversary Review: The Role of Hops in Brewing. J. Inst. Brew 2011, 117, 259–267.
Study Design Methods –!Hop Acids
•! ASBC-HPLC –!Hop Oil
•! Steam Distillation •! GC-FID – 17 compounds
–!Moisture •! % Solids at harvest •! Moisture content after kilning
–!Sensory •! Difference •! Acceptance •! Descriptive
Two Hop Varieties •! Cascade and
Willamette Two Farms
•! Willamette Valley Three Harvest Dates
•! Early, Typical, Late
Two Harvest Years •! 2010, 2011
Triplicate samples Total = 72 samples
Experimental Farms participating in hop maturity study
Coleman Farms
Goschie Farms
Harvest Timeline
F1 2010
F1 2011
F2 2010
F2 2011
F2 2010
F1 2010
F2 2011
F1 2011
F1 2011
F1 2010
F2 2011
F2 2011
F2 2010
F2 2010
F1 2010
F1 2011
F1 2011
F2 2011
F2 2011
F1 2010
F1 2010
F2 2010
F2 2010
F1 2011
8/17 8/19 8/21 8/23 8/25 8/27 8/29 8/31 9/2 9/4 9/6 9/8 9/10 9/12 9/14 9/16
Harvest Dates by Farm and Year
Will
amet
te
Cas
cade
Early Typical Late
Harvest Timeline
F1 2010
F1 2011
F2 2010
F2 2011
F2 2010
F1 2010
F2 2011
F1 2011
F1 2011
F1 2010
F2 2011
F2 2011
F2 2010
F2 2010
F1 2010
F1 2011
F1 2011
F2 2011
F2 2011
F1 2010
F1 2010
F2 2010
F2 2010
F1 2011
8/17 8/19 8/21 8/23 8/25 8/27 8/29 8/31 9/2 9/4 9/6 9/8 9/10 9/12 9/14 9/16
Harvest Dates by Farm and Year
Will
amet
te
Cas
cade
8 days
7
days
Early Typical Late
6 days
8 days
4 days
E2K"W01"<2-K249I8"2V"Z957/785"F$&6$G"-)H,&') F%,88.I+,E$") 9'8+#.6E$")[YK09797" Hydrocarbon, Monoterpene Pine
\YK09797" Hydrocarbon, Monoterpne Confierous Pine, woody
\YFG/R797" Hydrocarbon, Monoterpene Green, baslamic, slightly metallic
X0-29797" Hydrocarbon, Monoterpene Citric, Orange
]YRG-797" Hydrocarbon, Monoterpene like Orange wood spice
<./G2KBG11797" Hydrocarbon, Sesquiterpene Woody, Carrot
^_"\"YU./978797" Hydrocarbon, Sesquiterpene H/779_"C22IG_"C77IG_"B7/@.1_"K097".9I"J09"
E4-41797" Hydrocarbon, Sesquiterpene Woody
F75BG1"B7K5292.57" Oxygenated, Ester 3C775_"V/405G_"K7.RB_".K/0R25_"J/779_"@7//G"
H7/.9021" Oxygenated, Monoterpene Alcohol Sweet floral, perfumey
X09.1221" Oxygenated, Monoterpene Alcohol Floral, Orange
<05/2971121" Oxygenated, Monoterpene Floral, Rose Citrus
U./97821" Oxygenated, Sesquiterpene Alcohol Spicy
<05/.1" Oxygenated, other Sweet Citrus
H7/.9G1",R75.57" Oxygenated, Monoterpene or ester Floral, Sweet Citrus
^K2`0I7"Z" Oxygenated, Epoxide Spicy
^K2`0I7"%" Oxygenated, Epoxide Spicy
Traditional Brewing Quality Parameters
H.S.I. Alpha Acids
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
H.S
.I.
Cascade Willamette
Early Typical Late Harvest Point
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
% !
-aci
ds
Cascade Willamette
Early Typical Late Harvest Point
Cascade
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
8/17 8/19 8/21 8/23 8/25 8/27 8/29 8/31 9/2 9/4 9/6 9/8 9/10 9/12 9/14 9/16
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
l/100
g ho
ps)
Date
^8879S.1"W01"@G"E./:785"a.57"
U%"%!$!"
U$"%!$!"U$"%!$$"
U%"%!$$"
Cascade F7.98"
^./1G" =GK0R.1" X.57"W01";-1A$!!J?" $b%$" %b$*" %b!*"[YK09797";-JAJ?" !b!$" !b!%" !b!%"\YK09797" !b!(" !b$)" !b$)"\YFG/R797" +b(*" $$b+'" $$b!%"X0-29797" !b!%" !b!#" !b!#"]YRG-797" !b!$" !b!$" !b!$"<05/2971121" !b!*" !b!)" !b!&"F75BG1"B7K5292.57" !b!*" !b!&" !b!)"X09.1221" !b+'" !b)&" !b)$"<./G2KBG11797" !b'#" $b!'" !b&#"^_"\"YU./978797" $b+%" %b$(" $b&#"E4-41797" !b!*" !b!'" !b!#"<05/.1" !b!&" !b$(" !b$*"H7/.9G1",R75.57" !b!%" !b$%" !b$+"H7/.9021" !b!$" !b!%" !b!%"^K2`0I7"Z" !b!&" !b!#" !b!*"^K2`0I7"ZZ" !b%)" !b$%" !b$$"U./97821" !b!%" !b!%" !b!*"
Cascade F7.98"
^./1G" =GK0R.1" X.57" Tukey’s W01";-1A$!!J?" $b%$" %b$*" %b!*" ^c=dX"[YK09797";-JAJ?" !b!$" !b!%" !b!%" ^c=dX"\YK09797" !b!(" !b$)" !b$)" ^c=dX"\YFG/R797" +b(*" $$b+'" $$b!%" ^c=dX"X0-29797" !b!%" !b!#" !b!#" ^c=dX"]YRG-797" !b!$" !b!$" !b!$" ^c=dX"<05/2971121" !b!*" !b!)" !b!&" ^c=dX"F75BG1"B7K5292.57" !b!*" !b!&" !b!)" ^c=cX"X09.1221" !b+'" !b)&" !b)$" ^c=eX"<./G2KBG11797" !b'#" $b!'" !b&#"^_"\"YU./978797" $b+%" %b$(" $b&#"E4-41797" !b!*" !b!'" !b!#"<05/.1" !b!&" !b$(" !b$*"H7/.9G1",R75.57" !b!%" !b$%" !b$+" ^c=eX"H7/.9021" !b!$" !b!%" !b!%"^K2`0I7"Z" !b!&" !b!#" !b!*"^K2`0I7"ZZ" !b%)" !b$%" !b$$"U./97821" !b!%" !b!%" !b!*"
Cascade F7.98"
^./1G" =GK0R.1" X.57" Tukey’s W01";-1A$!!J?" $b%$" %b$*" %b!*" ^c=dX"[YK09797";-JAJ?" !b!$" !b!%" !b!%" ^c=dX"\YK09797" !b!(" !b$)" !b$)" ^c=dX"\YFG/R797" +b(*" $$b+'" $$b!%" ^c=dX"X0-29797" !b!%" !b!#" !b!#" ^c=dX"]YRG-797" !b!$" !b!$" !b!$" ^c=dX"<05/2971121" !b!*" !b!)" !b!&" ^c=dX"F75BG1"B7K5292.57" !b!*" !b!&" !b!)" ^c=cX"X09.1221" !b+'" !b)&" !b)$" ^c=eX"<./G2KBG11797" !b'#" $b!'" !b&#"^_"\"YU./978797" $b+%" %b$(" $b&#"E4-41797" !b!*" !b!'" !b!#"<05/.1" !b!&" !b$(" !b$*"H7/.9G1",R75.57" !b!%" !b$%" !b$+" ^c=eX"H7/.9021" !b!$" !b!%" !b!%"^K2`0I7"Z" !b!&" !b!#" !b!*"^K2`0I7"ZZ" !b%)" !b$%" !b$$"U./97821" !b!%" !b!%" !b!*"
Sensory - Cascade
Difference Testing: n = 18 •! Triangle Test
–! 14 correctly identified different sample (p< 0.001)
Consumer Testing: n = 62 •! Consumer Acceptance
–! Typical preferred over Late (0-9 scale)
Attribute Typical Late
Overall *** 7.11 ( 0.83)
6.26
(1.61)
Aroma *** 6.92 (1.31)
5.82 (1.96)
Flavor ** 6.98 (1.03)
6.23 (1.68)
***, ** significant at p< 0.01 and < 0.05 respectively, (SD),
Preliminary brewing: Cascade
•! Typical harvest hops = apple, apricot/peach, and sweaty/onion/garlic notes.
•! Late harvest hops = higher melon and floral notes.
A Study of Factors Affecting the Extraction of Flavor When Dry Hopping Beer
Dry hopping – experimental design
Instrumental Analysis
–! Beer brewed specifically for this project (5.1% EtOH v/v, 21 ppm Iso-!-acids)
–! Dry hopped for 12 days –! SPME/GC, HPLC, and UV Spec analysis –! Cold extraction, 4 C –! Samples taken at 2 hours, 4 hours, 6
hours, 24 hours, 4 days, 7 days, 12 days.
Sensory Analysis
–! Same beer (samples taken side by side) –! Sampled at 6 hours, 24 hours, 4 days,
12 days –! Trained sensory panel (11 individuals, 3
females 8 males) –! 3 training sessions, 4 testing sessions –! Categories scaled on a 0-15 point scale –! Examined aroma and bitterness
Form - whole cones vs. pellets (Cascade from same farm and harvest time) Extraction - passive contact vs. stirring
Dry Hop Method
•! The dry hop treatments were conducted in 3.5 hL (3 bbl) stainless steel CCVs
•! 90 Gallons (340 Liters) of beer in each treatment
•! 1 lb/barrel (386g/hL) hops used for each treatment
•! One CCV utilized a centrifugal pump for stirring
Overall hop aroma intensity
3.-K17
W:7/.11"Z9579805G
;K.971085"-7.9":.147?
H/24K8
3S//7I_"+"I.G8 &b+*% , " "
3S//7I_"$%"I.G8 &b%%( ,
3S//7I_"%+"B24/8 )b#&$ , Q
3S//7I_"'"B24/8 (b'$+ Q
L.880:7_"+"I.G8 #b(#! <
L.880:7_"'"B24/8 #b#+# <
L.880:7_"$%"I.G8 #b%!# <
L.880:7_"%+"B24/8 #b!%* " " <
Bitterness intensity
3.-K17
Q0O7/9788"Z9579805G ;K.971085"
-7.9":.147? H/24K8
3S//7I_"$%"I.G8 &b&*% , " " "
3S//7I_"+"I.G8 &b((* ,
3S//7I_"%+"B24/8 )b#') , Q
3S//7I_"'"B24/8 (b'$+ Q <
L.880:7_"%+"B24/8 'b%#! < a
L.880:7_"+"I.G8 'b$*' a
L.880:7_"$%"I.G8 #b&*% a
L.880:7_"'"B24/8 #b'#& " " " a
Results
!"
!b!#"
!b$"
!b$#"
!b%"
!b%#"
!b*"
!b*#"
!" #!" $!!" $#!" %!!" %#!" *!!"
<29R
795/
.S29
";-JA
X?"
=0-7";B24/8?"
NB217"E2K8_"3S//7I" NB217"E2K8_"L.880:7" L71175"E2K8_"3S//7I" L71175"E2K8_"L.880:7"
Linalool
Results
!"
$"
%"
*"
+"
#"
'"
("
)"
&"
$!"
!" #!" $!!" $#!" %!!" %#!" *!!"
<29R
795/
.S29
";-JA
X?"
=0-7";B24/8?"
NB217"E2K8_"3S//7I" NB217"E2K8_"L.880:7" L71175"E2K8_"3S//7I" L71175"E2K8_"L.880:7"
Myrcene
Results
!"
!b#"
$"
$b#"
%"
%b#"
*"
*b#"
+"
+b#"
#"
!" $" %" *" +" #" '" ("
<29R
795/
.S29
";-JA
X?"
=0-7";B24/8?"
NB217"E2K8_"3S//7I" NB217"E2K8_"L.880:7" L71175"E2K8_"3S//7I" L71175"E2K8_"L.880:7"
Myrcene – First 6 hours
Results
Compound 6 Hours,
Passive 6 Hours,
Stirred Peak,
Passive Peak,
Stirred Final,
Passive Final,
Stirred
Myrcene 0.5% 2.6% 2.4% 5.6% 1.0% 4.0% Limonene 40.7% 41.8% 42.7% 52.2% 17% 30.8% Linalool 6.8% 9.0% 28.7% 48.5% 21% 48.5% Humulene 0.5% 1.1% 0.94% 0.9% 0.15% 0.64% Geraniol 70.3% 57.3% 70.3% 119% 50.3% 91.0%
Compound 6 Hours,
Passive 6 Hours,
Stirred Peak,
Passive Peak,
Stirred Final,
Passive Final,
Stirred Myrcene 8.4% 19.9% 9.7% 37.2% 5.9% 25.8% Limonene 43.1% 69.1% 43.1% 82.4% 39.5% 75.2% Linalool 55.6% 89.2% 57.2% 100.7% 56.1% 90.6% Humulene 1.3% 8.3% 1.3% 17.1% 1.2% 14.2% Geraniol 90.8% 105.2% 97.1% 117.9% 97.1% 102.9%
Results
!"
%!"
+!"
'!"
)!"
$!!"
$%!"
$+!"
$'!"
$)!"
!" #!" $!!" $#!" %!!" %#!" *!!"
L21G
KB79
21"<
29R7
95/.
S29"
;-JA
X?"
=0-7";B24/8?"
NB217"E2K8_"L.880:7" NB217"E2K8_"3S//7I" L71175"E2K8_"L.880:7" L71175"E2K8_"3S//7I"
Hop Derived Polyphenols
Results
!"
%"
+"
'"
)"
$!"
$%"
$+"
!" #!" $!!" $#!" %!!" %#!" *!!"
[Y.R
0I"R
29R7
95/.
S29"
;-JA
X?"
=0-7";B24/8?"
NB217"E2K8_"L.880:7" NB217"E2K8_"3S//7I" L711758_"L.880:7" L711758_"3S//7I"
!-acids
Conclusions
•! The stirred treatment yielded more overall aroma intensity, bitterness, and astringency relative to the unstirred treatment
•! As expected, !-acid concentration did not correlate to increased bitterness even though significant extraction occurred –! Polyphenol extraction did correlate to increased bitterness
Shellhammer Lab non-hop-related current projects
•! Fermentation performance studies •! Sour beer characterization
Methylsulfonylmethane & Fermentation
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0.0E+00
2.0E+07
4.0E+07
6.0E+07
8.0E+07
1.0E+08
1.2E+08
1.4E+08
1.6E+08
1.8E+08
2.0E+08
!" %!" +!" '!" )!" $!!" $%!"
Gra
vity
(°B
rix)
Cel
l Cou
nt (C
ells
/ml)
Time (Hours)
J#,K.(/),"-)F'%%)F$G"():LAM)LB)NON)
Cell Count
Gravity
Standard (Normal) pitching rate
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
!" %!" +!" '!" )!" $!!" $%!"
Gra
vity
(°B
rix)
Time (Hours)
10^6, 0% MSM
10^6, 0.25% MSM
10^6, 0.5% MSM
10^6, 0.75% MSM 0.25% MSM
Underpitched
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
!" %!" +!" '!" )!" $!!" $%!"
Gra
vity
(°B
rix)
Time (Hours)
10^5, 0% MSM
10^5, 0.25% MSM
10^5, 0.5% MSM
10^5, 0.75% MSM 0.25% MSM
Underpitched
0.00E+00
2.00E+07
4.00E+07
6.00E+07
8.00E+07
1.00E+08
1.20E+08
1.40E+08
1.60E+08
1.80E+08
2.00E+08
!" %!" +!" '!" )!" $!!" $%!"
Cel
l Cou
nt (C
ells
/ml)
Time (Hours)
Yeast Cell Count
10^5, 0% MSM
10^5, 0.25% MSM
10^5, 0.5% MSM
10^5, 0.75% MSM
0.25% MSM
Sensory Evaluation of Belgian and US Red/Brown Sour Beers
•! 13 Commercial Red/Brown Sour Beers
–! 6 Belgian (Flemish) procured via importer –! 7 US Craft (West, Midwest, East Coast) donated from
US breweries •! Instrumental Analysis •! Sensory Descriptive Analysis
Methods Instrumental Analysis
•! Organic Acids •! Acetate and Lactate •! Esters •! Higher Alcohols •! Volatile Phenols •! Fatty Acids •! Iso alpha acids
•! Apparent Extract •! Real Extract •! Alcohol by Volume •! Real Degree of
Fermentation •! pH •! Color •! Bitterness Units
Volatile Phenols
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0 1 2
PPB
4-Ethyl Guaiacol
American Belgian 0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 1 2
PPB
4-Vinyl Guaiacol
American Belgian 0
200 400 600 800
1000 1200 1400 1600
0 1 2
PPB
4-Ethyl Phenol
American Belgian
meaty, smoky, clove, apple wood smoked bacon
-! medicinal, rubber, Band-Aid
F7.84/7-795" ,-7/0R.9" Q71J.09" 5Y5785"497f4.1":./0.9R7"
PQ'(R/%)JG,.,+$%";4JAX?";KK@?" $%&*" '#(" !b!)*"
PQK."/%)JG,.,+$%";4JAX?";KK@?" $#%" &*" !b!&!"
PQ'(R/%)SR'"$%";4JAX?";KK@?" '$'" %+$" !b!+&"
}
Cluster Analysis of Sensory Data
Questions? 3QP""
Y"."97C".9I"/.K0I"-75B2I"V2/"I757/-0909J"@0O7/9788"09"@77/"
L/2@17-g"
•! ZQP"2:7/78S-.578"@0O7/9788h"78K7R0.11G"CB79"I/GYB2KK7I"@77/8"./7"-7.84/7I"
•! Z,,"08"R2-K10R.57I_"S-7YR2984-09J".9I"I0iR415"52"B.9I17"
•! ELX<"7f40K-795"08"7`K7980:7".9I"5B7"-75B2I"08"S-7YR2984-09J"
""=B7/7"08"."I7-.9I"V2/"."97C"-75B2Ij"
3QP"3210I"KB.87"7`5/.RS29"Y"K/09R0K17"
Z11485/.S298"V/2-"3PL^X<W_"Q4117S9"&$!"
L/09R0K17"2V"5B7"97C"3QP"-75B2I"
X0f40I"RB/2-.52J/.KBG"
3K7R5/2KB252-757/"
Z11485/.S298"V/2-"3PL^X<W_"Q4117S9"&$!"
F7.84/7-795g"
•! L1.R7"714795"09"."8K7R5/2KB252-757/"
" " "3QP"d",@8%(#9-"k"(#"
3QP"1.@"854IG"
•! *!"I0l7/795_"R2--7/R0.11G".:.01.@17"@77/8"C7/7"-7.84/7Ig"–! ZQP".RR2/I09J"52",3Q<_"Q77/Y%*"–! Z,,_"./RB07:7I"-75B2I"–! Z82Y[Y.R0I"R29R795/.S29"mKK-n":0."ELX<"–! 3QP_"97C"-75B2I"
•! ,182_"@0O7/9788".8"K7/R70:7I"@G"."5/.097I"87982/G"K.971";$$"5/.097I"K.9710858?"C.8"I757/-097I"–! o.S9J"29"."8R.17"V/2-"!"52"$#_""
CB7/7"!"d"925"@0O7/".9I"$#"d"7`5/7-7"@0O7/9788"
<2//71.S29"@75C779"3QP".9I"082Y[Y.R0I"R29R795/.S29";:0."ELX<?"
G"d"!b(&$+`"p"+b&!%%"oq"d"!b&*%#'"
!b!"
$!b!"
%!b!"
*!b!"
+!b!"
#!b!"
'!b!"
(!b!"
!b!" $!b!" %!b!" *!b!" +!b!" #!b!" '!b!" (!b!"
O5T)066&
)U8$Q,%6R,Q,+.-84)
F$"+'"(#,E$")$V).8$Q,%6R,Q,+.-8)066&4).")1''#)K.,)WSXF)
<2//71.S29"@75C779"3QP".9I""87982/G"@0O7/9788"
G"d"+b$&*$`"Y"(b%$+"oq"d"!b&%)$+"
!b!"
$!b!"
%!b!"
*!b!"
+!b!"
#!b!"
'!b!"
!b!" *b!" 'b!" &b!" $%b!" $#b!"
O5T)066&
)U8$Q,%6R,Q,+.-84)
O'"8$#/)1.Y'#"'88))0L)Z)"$)1.Y'#"'88M):=)Z)&,7)1.Y'#"'884)
<2-K./0829"2V"R2//71.S298"@75C779"ZQP".9I"3QP"C05B"082Y[Y.R0I"R29R795/.S29"
oq"d"!b&!#)*"
oq"d"!b&*%#'"
!b!"
$!b!"
%!b!"
*!b!"
+!b!"
#!b!"
'!b!"
(!b!"
)!b!"
&!b!"
!b!" $!b!" %!b!" *!b!" +!b!" #!b!" '!b!" (!b!"
U5T[O5T
)
F$"+'"(#,E$")$V).8$Q,%6R,Q,+.-8)066&4).")1''#)K.,)WSXF)
ZQP" 3L^QP"