26
WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014

WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014

WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire WorkshopMammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, KentuckyApril 30, 2014

Page 2: WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014

OVERVIEW• WNS Observations• Gray Bats• Indiana Bats• Northern Long-eared Bats• Little Brown Bats• Tricolored Bats

• Improved Understanding of Where Bats Persist on the Landscape• Survey guidance• Other methods being researched

• Proposed Listings & Status Assessments

Page 3: WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014

WNS- Observations from the Southeast

• Earliest infected sites in NC and TN have had declines similar to other NE states (~95% winter)• Smaller declines now

being observed in KY• NC also reporting

summer capture declines

Page 4: WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014

Gray Bats• De-listing of gray bats put on hold once WNS arrived in U.S.• WNS confirmed from a few gray bats in TN• Observed large scale movements of some hibernating

populations in TN & AR• WNS related?

• Populations remain stable to increasing although WNS confirmed as early as 2011

Page 5: WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014

Indiana Bat Population Trends8/26/2013

2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 20130

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

350,000

166,107 186,588

196,197 194,475 191,446 195,554 197,707

238,739 246,673

285,729

320,342

281,977

308,324 300,675

16,384 19,658 23,672 22,295 30,569

32,468

17,584

30,344 33,645 42,710

53,763 33,855

16,124

18,273

Ozark-Central (AR, IL, MO & OK)Midwest (AL, IN, KY, MI, OH, TN & SW. VA)Appalachian (E. TN, PA, NC, VA & WV)Northeast (NY, NJ & VT)

Year

Popu

latio

n Si

ze

Andy King, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bloomington, Indiana. Revised 8-26-2013Andy King, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bloomington, Indiana. Revised

Indiana Bat Population Estimates by Recovery Unit from 2001 - 2013

Page 6: WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014

Indiana Bats• WNS confirmed on individuals in TN & KY

• Visible fungus always observed after MYLU, PESU, & MYSE(2nd year)• Large scale movements of some hibernating populations in IN• Approximately 20% decline in some minor KY hibernacula

during winter of 2014• Few sites surveyed are mostly stable in TN during this non-

Indiana bat year

Page 7: WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014

Northern Long-eared Bats

• Difficult to assess impact due to hibernation strategy• Declines reported from wintering populations in NC & TN• Pre- and Post- WNS wintering populations trends in KY are

variable • Some population “spikes” in numbers of bats documented within

a year of WNS infection• Documented mortality as far west as AR (January 2014)

• Summer capture rates remain stable currently• Typically 3rd most common species throughout much of the

Southeast including KY

Page 8: WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014

Little Brown Bats

• Little brown bat populations declining• States with sites of

multi-year infection are seeing significant declines (NC, TN & KY)• Approximately 60% in

many KY hibernaculum (2014)• Some sites are

remaining stable

Page 9: WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014

Tricolored Bats

• Perhaps the most visibly impacted species thus far in the Southeast

• Difficult to assess overall impact on hibernating populations• Population “spikes” at hibernaculum post infection as individuals

move towards entrances• Biologists in NC, TN, KY, GA, and AL observed hanging dead

tricolored bats at multiple hibernaculum in over the last two winters

• We know significant mortality is occurring but overall numbers in hibernaculum are not much different than pre-WNS estimates

Page 10: WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014

Improving Detection of Species

• Vitally important to know where populations persist so that adequate protection is provided when needed

– P/A Survey Guidance– Acoustic Lures– Wildlife Detection Dogs

10

Page 11: WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014

2014 Indiana BatSummer Survey Guidance

Page 12: WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014

2014 Guidelines:A Phased Approach

1. Initial Project Screening - existing records search and habitat assessment

2. Presence-Absence Surveys - conduct mist netting OR acoustic surveys

3. Follow-up Mist-netting Surveys (optional) to capture any bats initially detected in Phase 2 surveys.

4. Radio-tracking & Emergence Surveys

Page 13: WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014

42 net nights9 net nights

2014 LOE

4 detector nights

Page 14: WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014

White Paper – RecommendationsVarying netting LOE based on WNS status in RU

Definition of “WNS-impacted” RU for survey protocols:• If winter counts document that ≥50% of Priority 1 and 2

hibernacula within a RU decline by ≥30% from their most recent pre-WNS population estimates

OR • the total RU population declines by ≥30% from their most

recent pre-WNS population estimates, then that RU should be considered WNS-impacted

Page 15: WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014

White Paper – Recommendations2014 (based on pre-WNS and 2013 pop. #s)WNS-impacted RUs:Northeast (70% decline) and Appalachian (45.8% decline)

NOT WNS-impacted RUs:Midwest (2.5% decline) and Ozark-Central (no decline)

Page 16: WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014

Northern Long-Eared Bat• 2014

– Use Indiana bat summer protocols based on initial data

• 2015 and beyond– Gather additional data (acoustic/netting)– Request and analyze survey reports – Estimate detection/occupancy rates

• Develop level of effort and determine if NLEB Survey Guidance Team is needed based on results (i.e., are there significant differences in results from Indiana bat?)

Page 17: WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014

Improving Detection of Indiana Bats

• Acoustic Lure Study– Playback of bat vocalizations to attract bats to

mist-nets and increase capture success– IBCF funded study within known maternity colony

in KY– Positive results after two summers with increased

capture of not only Indiana bats but all species of bats compared to previous capture rates within same colony home range

Page 18: WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014

Improving Detection of Indiana Bats

• Wildlife Detection Dogs– One dog trained to

detect Indiana bat guano– KYFO working with

handler to evaluate dogs abilities and determine applicability in context of consultation and recovery workload• Roost trees and

hibernacula

Page 19: WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014

NLEB Proposed Listing• as endangered due to WNS• FR Notice published October 2, 2013• Public comment period closed January 2014• Service currently considering comments submitted• Almost all SE states have populations of NLEB• KY & TN have highest numbers

• Service Team currently working on Conference/ Consultation and Conservation Guidance• Interim Conference Guidance (finalized Jan 2014)• Consultation & Conservation Guidance (Oct 2014)

• Section 10 Permits• Recommendations for past, present, and future projects

Page 20: WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014

Species Status Assessment Updates

Little Brown Bat Tricolored Bat

Page 21: WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014

Timeline

1. USGS/USFWS little brown bat demographic model

2. Expert Elicitation – Range wide– Several working groups (for example: genetics,

dist/abund, ecology)– Completed April 2013

Page 22: WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014

Current Activities

• Continuing to work on status assessment• Includes examining all listable entities under

the ESA (species level, subspecies, or any possible distinct population segment (s))

Page 23: WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014

Midwest Region Lead Contact

Karl [email protected] (office)

Page 24: WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014

Tricolored Bat• Service Initiated Assessment• Timeline– Initial stages of review– In the process of summarizing data collected

during 2011 multi-species request– Anticipate a second request for new information

going out in May• After winter surveys and spring emergence work

– Validating recent publications on range expansion

Page 25: WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014

Interested in:

• Interpreting the population “spikes” that are consistently being documented during first years of WNS arrival at hibernaculum– Hopeful the analysis of new data will help

Page 26: WNS Concerns & Service Guidance for Myotis Conservation Bats & Fire Workshop Mammoth Cave National Park, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky April 30, 2014

Northeast Region Lead Contacts

Jonathan ReichardNational WNS Assistant [email protected] (office)413-335-2886 (cell)

Christina KocerNortheast Region WNS [email protected] (office)413-335-4482 (cell)