17
Young Researchers Seminar 2011 DTU, Denmark, June 8 - 10, 2011 Young Researchers Seminar 2013 Lyon, France , June 5-7 2013 Evaluation of V2I Technologies How to Adjust Cost-Benefit-Analyses (CBA) to ITS? Dipl.-Ing. Wolfgang Niebel German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Transportation systems

Young Researchers Seminar 2011 DTU, Denmark, June 8 - 10, 2011 Young Researchers Seminar 2013 Lyon, France, June 5-7 2013 Evaluation of V2I Technologies

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Young Researchers Seminar 2011 DTU, Denmark, June 8 - 10, 2011 Young Researchers Seminar 2013 Lyon, France, June 5-7 2013 Evaluation of V2I Technologies

Young Researchers Seminar 2011DTU, Denmark, June 8 - 10, 2011

Young Researchers Seminar 2013Lyon, France , June 5-7 2013

Evaluation of V2I TechnologiesHow to Adjust Cost-Benefit-Analyses (CBA) to ITS?

Dipl.-Ing. Wolfgang NiebelGerman Aerospace Center (DLR),

Institute of Transportation systems

Page 2: Young Researchers Seminar 2011 DTU, Denmark, June 8 - 10, 2011 Young Researchers Seminar 2013 Lyon, France, June 5-7 2013 Evaluation of V2I Technologies

2

Content

•Evaluation Cost-Benefit-Analyses•V2I Technologies Cooperative ITS•Adjustments CBA with Microsimulation•Results ? •Outlook Future Research

Evaluation of V2I Technologies

Page 3: Young Researchers Seminar 2011 DTU, Denmark, June 8 - 10, 2011 Young Researchers Seminar 2013 Lyon, France, June 5-7 2013 Evaluation of V2I Technologies

3

Introduction

Evaluation of V2I Technologies

l = 1 km

q = 15.000 veh/dv = 20 km/ht = 3 min

Page 4: Young Researchers Seminar 2011 DTU, Denmark, June 8 - 10, 2011 Young Researchers Seminar 2013 Lyon, France, June 5-7 2013 Evaluation of V2I Technologies

4

Introduction

Evaluation of V2I Technologies

l = 1,7 kmq = 15.000 veh/dv = 50 km/ht = 2 min t = 1 min

Page 5: Young Researchers Seminar 2011 DTU, Denmark, June 8 - 10, 2011 Young Researchers Seminar 2013 Lyon, France, June 5-7 2013 Evaluation of V2I Technologies

5

CBA in Road Projects

Evaluation of V2I Technologies

Global Goals Benefit Criteria

1. Mobility a) Vehicle Travel Time

  b) Pedestrians and Bike Delay Time

2. Resource Efficiency c) Vehicle Operation + Maintenance

  Vehicle Occupancy Rate

3. Environment Friendliness d) Pollutant Immissions (NOx, CO, HC, PA)

  e) Climate Gas Emission (CO2)

  f) Noise Immissions

  g) Fuel Consumption

4. Safety h) Accidents and Fatalities

Page 6: Young Researchers Seminar 2011 DTU, Denmark, June 8 - 10, 2011 Young Researchers Seminar 2013 Lyon, France, June 5-7 2013 Evaluation of V2I Technologies

6

V2I Technologies in

•Cooperative ITS + ADAS (ACC)

GLOSA

Evaluation of V2I Technologies

Page 7: Young Researchers Seminar 2011 DTU, Denmark, June 8 - 10, 2011 Young Researchers Seminar 2013 Lyon, France, June 5-7 2013 Evaluation of V2I Technologies

7

Adjustments: Scale of Model

Evaluation of V2I Technologies

Page 8: Young Researchers Seminar 2011 DTU, Denmark, June 8 - 10, 2011 Young Researchers Seminar 2013 Lyon, France, June 5-7 2013 Evaluation of V2I Technologies

8

Adjustments: Cooperative ITS

Evaluation of V2I Technologies

Scenario Traffic Control C2I Rate Tailback Estimation

Vehicle Approach Control

Base Line Status Quo 0% Test 1 KOLINE Optimiser

Test 2 KOLINE Optimiser 5%

detectors + vehicle data

Test 3 ‘‘ 15%Test 4 ‘‘ 25%Test 5 ‘‘

35%Test 6 ‘‘ +lateral control

Test 8 ‘‘ API: SignalPlan.csv,DetectorCounts.csv <300m Ø

API:TRANSfusion.jar

→Desired speed→Forced lane change

Page 9: Young Researchers Seminar 2011 DTU, Denmark, June 8 - 10, 2011 Young Researchers Seminar 2013 Lyon, France, June 5-7 2013 Evaluation of V2I Technologies

9

Adjustments: Extrapolation

Evaluation of V2I Technologies

„Modelling traffic as a stochastical system [rather than as deterministic chaos] seems more plausible to me.“(Prof. Dr. Dr. Reinhard Selten, Nobel Prize Economy 1994)

Page 10: Young Researchers Seminar 2011 DTU, Denmark, June 8 - 10, 2011 Young Researchers Seminar 2013 Lyon, France, June 5-7 2013 Evaluation of V2I Technologies

10

Extrapolation I: Stochastics

Evaluation of V2I Technologies

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 18020

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

flow [veh/h]

mea

n tr

avel

time

[s/v

eh]

count:

1

1

1

2

2

=7

nsim= 17

n =1.088

nclassx=14+1

nclassy=7+1

Page 11: Young Researchers Seminar 2011 DTU, Denmark, June 8 - 10, 2011 Young Researchers Seminar 2013 Lyon, France, June 5-7 2013 Evaluation of V2I Technologies

11

Extrapolation II: Probability

Evaluation of V2I Technologies

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 1600%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

>55

55

50

45

40

35

30

25

flow [veh/h] (upper class limit)

prob

abili

ty o

f tra

vel ti

mes

[s]

14,3%

14,3%

14,3%

28,6%

28,6%

Page 12: Young Researchers Seminar 2011 DTU, Denmark, June 8 - 10, 2011 Young Researchers Seminar 2013 Lyon, France, June 5-7 2013 Evaluation of V2I Technologies

12

Workdays [d/a]

count 14 48 77 48 14 201

factor 0,91 0,95 1,0 1,05 1,09

ADTw:2.000 1.820 1.900 2.000 2.100 2.180

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 240

50

100

150

200

250

DTVmaxDTVw1,05DTVw1,0DTVw0,95DTVw0,91DTVmin

hour

flow

[veh

/h]

Extrapolation III: Load Curves

Evaluation of V2I Technologies

Page 13: Young Researchers Seminar 2011 DTU, Denmark, June 8 - 10, 2011 Young Researchers Seminar 2013 Lyon, France, June 5-7 2013 Evaluation of V2I Technologies

13

Extrapolation IV: Relevant Hours

Evaluation of V2I Technologies

Daytype Day count Hours @ q=20 [h/a]

Workdays1,0 77 5 385

Sundays and public holidays1,0 25 2 50

      435

Travel time interval Probability

]25,30]s 28,6% 124

]30,35]s 28,6% 124

]35,40]s 14,3% 62

]40,45]s 14,3% 62

]45,50]s 14,3% 62

Page 14: Young Researchers Seminar 2011 DTU, Denmark, June 8 - 10, 2011 Young Researchers Seminar 2013 Lyon, France, June 5-7 2013 Evaluation of V2I Technologies

14Evaluation of V2I Technologies

Results I

Criteria Impact

a) Vehicle Travel Time [26,78] %

c) Vehicle Operation incl. (g) Fuel Consumption [17,57] %

e) Climate Gas Emission (CO2) [5,17] %

b) Pedestrians Delay Time 0 %

d) Pollutant Immissions (NOx, CO, HC, PA) 0 %

Page 15: Young Researchers Seminar 2011 DTU, Denmark, June 8 - 10, 2011 Young Researchers Seminar 2013 Lyon, France, June 5-7 2013 Evaluation of V2I Technologies

15Evaluation of V2I Technologies

Results II

Scenario Number of passed nodes nN

1 2 3 4 5Test1 172,0Test2 0,8 1,6 2,4 3,1 3,8Test3 0,9 1,7 2,5 3,2 4,0Test4 0,8 1,6 2,3 3,0 3,7Test5 0,8 1,6 2,4 3,2 3,9Test8 0,9 1,7 2,5 3,3 4,1

Page 16: Young Researchers Seminar 2011 DTU, Denmark, June 8 - 10, 2011 Young Researchers Seminar 2013 Lyon, France, June 5-7 2013 Evaluation of V2I Technologies

16

Outlook

Evaluation of V2I Technologies

•Extrapolation other criteria?•Bayesian Network q(t-1)v(t)▫Travel time : workdays sundays▫Different probability distribution?

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 240

50

100

150

200

250

hour

flow

[veh

/h]

Page 17: Young Researchers Seminar 2011 DTU, Denmark, June 8 - 10, 2011 Young Researchers Seminar 2013 Lyon, France, June 5-7 2013 Evaluation of V2I Technologies

17

AcknowledgementsThe KOLINE project was granted by the German Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology (BMWi) according to a decision of the German Federal Parliament within the 3rd transport research framework “Mobility and Transport Technologies”.

Project partners:• TU Braunschweig

▫ Institute of Transportation and Urban Engineering▫ Institute of Control Engineering

• Institut für Automation und Kommunikation e.V. Magdeburg (ifak),• Transver GmbH Munich,• Volkswagen AG Wolfsburg (VW)

Evaluation of V2I Technologies