Transcript

What are beginning teachers looking for online?

The TeachConnect story(and what can be learnt from it)

Nick Kelly and Steven KickbuschQueensland University of Technology

Online teacher support

What would a utopia of online support for teachers look like?• Technology• A national profession• The potential of connectedness• Asking teachers (participation)• Independent, focussed, inclusive• Elements of the vision

• Facebook• BRITE• StackExchange, Quora• AirBnB, Uber

What is TeachConnect?

Online support for teachers

• Altruistic

• Broad stakeholders / diverse participants

• Continuity

Knowledge – professional, searchable, growingMentorship – peer, one to oneLive Chat – events, synchronous, storedEvidence - APST

Narrative

• Design-Based Research• Participation of teachers and teacher educators

• Four years• Consultation, research, productive failure, authentic

• (Collins, Joseph, & Bielaczyc, 2004)

1. Theoretical foundations

2. Phases of designTheory, survey, TeachQA, TeachConnect, Iterations

3. Outcomes from each phase

4. Overall lessons learned

Is TeachConnect a success (yet)?

• We’re working on it• Usage data

• Engagement• Initial experience• Frequency of returning

• Emailing• Events• Quality of content

• Sense of belonging• Social, affective, cognitive presence

• Mentorship training• Working closely with groups• Creating social norms in platform

Recipe for online teacher support

• Technology• Platform• Hosting

• Support of key stakeholders across systems• Accreditation body (QCT, BOSTES, Registration Board, VIT, TQI,

AITSL)

• Work with universities• Breadth of relationships – inclusivity• Depth – embed in courses

• Work with everybody• Schools, school system, existing groups, government,

personal networks• Find mutual benefit everywhere

Towards Utopia…

• National, international

• Looking for champions

• AITSL, Government• Does anybody know how to do this?!?

• Sharing design principles• Independent, focussed

• Breadth & depth of stakeholders

• Low threshold for participant involvement

• Integrated into the profession

• Focus on altruism and mutual benefit

• Wide community with trust for reflection

Thank you

One of the things I've found is that if any one of a group of people with similar problems asks a question there's a good chance that the question will reflect some of the thinking of

their peers.

Myles Horton

Paulo Freire & Myles Horton (1990)We Make the Road by Walking

Recent Australian references

Designing online networks for teachers

• Clarà, M., Kelly, N., Mauri, T., & Danaher, P. (2015). Can massive communities of teachers facilitate collaborative reflection? Fractal design as a possible answer. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 1-13.

• Herrington, A., Herrington, J., Kervin, L., & Ferry, B. (2006). The design of an online community of practice for beginning teachers. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6(1), 120-132.

• Kelly, N., & Antonio, A. (2016). Teacher peer support in social network sites. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 138-149.

• Kelly, N., Clará, M., Kehrwald, B., & Danaher, P. (In press). Online Learning Networks for Pre-service and Early Career Teachers. UK: Palgrave Pivot.

• Mansfield, C. F., Beltman, S., Broadley, T., & Weatherby-Fell, N. (2016). Building resilience in teacher education: An evidence informed framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 54, 77-87.

• Prestridge, S. (2016). Conceptualising self-generating online teacher professional development. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 1-20.

• Redmond, P. (2015). Discipline specific online mentoring for secondary pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 90, 95-104.

• Sari, E., & Herrington, J. (2013). Using design-based research to investigate the design and development of an online community of practice for teacher professional development.

Steven [email protected]

Contact us

Nick [email protected]


Recommended