ISSN (ONLINE) : 2349 - 3399 ISSN (PRINT) : 2349 - 3380
IJARRAS Volume 3 Issue 3 Page 1254
Developing Communication Skills through Co-operative Teaching Methodology. Dr.P.Sreeramulu
Asst Professor, GITAM University, Bengaluru
“India is a vibrant country brimming with potential… we should develop needed soft skills
throughout India.” -An English Teacher
“With the business environment rapidly expanding in India, there is also huge demand for
quality corporate communication skills training. There is also a lack of providers with the
experience and expertise to give professionals the standard they require.”
-A Private Corporate Trainer
Language is an expression of human activity. English language has become so
popular that among the 1.1 billion people of India who speak and communicate in more than
a thousand languages, a vast majority have a common language-English. This languages is
now an employment passport to a fresh graduate, In fact, it still remains a strong
communicative language. The success of an endeavour hinges on the ability to communicate
effectively in today’s fast paced life, everyone is asked to do more with less. In such a
scenario, effective communication holds the key. Effectively, communication centres’ round
the usage of words, speed of delivery of words, pitch modulation and body language. Using
the right tools to communicate the right messages at the right time can salvage crises and
motivate people to work towards success. Truly said, communication works but for those
who work at it. In the existing globalization scenario, most of the Information Technology,
I.F Enabled Services, management institutes, public and private sector, multi-national
Companies, Union Public Service Commission, and State Public Service Commission search
for a right and suitable fresher for executive posts. Whatever be the recruiting criteria that IT.
ITES, industry giants had in their agenda, once this was clear a first class degree would not
ISSN (ONLINE) : 2349 - 3399 ISSN (PRINT) : 2349 - 3380
IJARRAS Volume 3 Issue 3 Page 1255
serve the purpose, the candidate has to satisfy the skill sets that the companies were looking
for, And unanimously, the important group in the skills set is the communication skills. It has
been identified in several studies conducted by the MNCs and IT sector industries that many
Indian graduates (around 50% of technical qualifications and hard skill’s at university but
lacking in communications skills essential to getting the right job. There is a need to provide
valuable training to Indian students so they can develop these vital soft skills, making them
more employable and better equipped to achieve their full potential. How can we do it? Is our
curriculum flexible enough?
There are several ways how this can be done. The campus recruitment training
institutions which mushroomed, thanks to the blooming ITES, claim to develop the
communication skills of the students in just as short a time as two months. Some of them
even convince the4 skill deprived enthusiast that they can become effective communicators
within a month, if they choose so. The Indian graduate student in search of a decent job that
requires good communication skills as a prerequisite can be broadly categorized under two
streams engineering and non-engineering Students coming under the engineering stream in
some states like Andhra Pradesh can be regarded fortunate in the sense that considerable
changes have been made to their curriculum to add communication skills development
component in the form of practical/laboratory course work. It is the non-engineering
graduates that we need to care more for. As we know there is a great rural-urban divide
among the student population in India and this division becomes more effective in the
analysis of communicative Performance of the students in English. Most often, English as a
course is present in the 1 st year of the 4 th year B.Tech Programme. Within the curricular
framework and given academic constraints, can we develop the communicative skills of
Indian students?
ISSN (ONLINE) : 2349 - 3399 ISSN (PRINT) : 2349 - 3380
IJARRAS Volume 3 Issue 3 Page 1256
The fact that 85-90% of college leavers in India are not considered immediately
suitable for employment in the ITES sector presents a huge challenge for the industry. So
what is the solution? One of the action points from the 2008 NASSCOM-Everest BPO report
is to:
“Increase employability and access untapped talent pools by creating greater linkages
between the current education system and the needs BPO industry, and facilitating the
development of BPO-specific education models.”
The report goes on to make a number of recommendations in this area:
“Initiatives related to education are required to expand the employable talent pool in
India. The industry needs to work more aggressively with the Government to create greater
linkage between the current education system and requirements of the BPO industry. This can
be done by 1) Policy changes like liberalization of higher education, 2) increased
collaboration between industry and academic institutions to take up initiatives such as
introduction of BPO-specific curriculum and improving students’ access to funds for higher
studies, 3) introducing coursework changes and teacher training at the school level in
accordance with future requirements of the BPO industry.
The need of the hour is to teach English not as a subject but as a language in use, and
focus on the nuances of oral communication. This will help to develop the ability to use
discourse features of spoken English in regular communication. A concentrated development
of basic skills rather than specific skills (like call centre skills, front office skills, etc.,) will go
a great way in making the students autonomous in choosing their career. What is important in
this context is the need to revisit our teaching methodologies adopted and give more
emphasis on Listening and Speaking skills, In short, instead of calling it development of
communication skills and making it the term ‘employability skills” and make all the teachers
ISSN (ONLINE) : 2349 - 3399 ISSN (PRINT) : 2349 - 3380
IJARRAS Volume 3 Issue 3 Page 1257
teaching various courses in a college responsible in making a student ready for the job
market. There is extensive material available on the communication skills requirements in
workplaces including different new age jobs; tertiary level learners preparedness to face thse
emerging workplace challenges; the effectiveness of the existing UG Curriculum and
teaching methodology to prepare our learners for the workplace; and the need to change the
existing curriculum or to reinforce it.
Some observations regarding the communicative efficiency of the students are listed
below.
• Some students write well, but they are not able to express themselves orally.
• Some speak fluently, but cannot write without grammatical errors.
• Some are comfortable speaking among themselves in a small group, but are not
comfortable facing the audience.
• Some having problems with their body languages and use inappropriate gestures,
some find it difficult to maintain eye contact.
• Some are always misunderstood. Some students had
• Limited vocabulary
• Inaccurate grammar
• Lack of fluency
• Imperfect pronunciation
• Lack of active listening
• Fear of speaking in public
• Fear of expressing certain views
• Lack of confidence
• Lack of group skills
ISSN (ONLINE) : 2349 - 3399 ISSN (PRINT) : 2349 - 3380
IJARRAS Volume 3 Issue 3 Page 1258
• Fear of group skills
• Lack of exposure and practice.
It is generally perceived by the managements and academic staff of the
colleges that is the responsibility of the English Teacher Alone to develop the
communication skills of the students. In most of the rural colleges in A.P courses
other than English are taught in vernacular medium. Here, it is important to note that
most of the UG programs like B.Sc, B.Com, B.A., etc. except professional
programmes like B.Tech, B. Pharm, MBBS, etc in A.P, are offered in both vernacular
and English mediums. English is usually taught in the first year of the non
engineering UG programmers along with second language and other branch related
courses. On an average, time allotted for English course in the curriculum on these on
these UG programmers is 4hrs of classroom teaching and 3hrs of laboratory practice
while the total number of teaching hours (if all courses are put together) per week is
40. It is here that we can make some practical adjustments to our teaching methods in
the college. The scenario is not much different.
With B.Tech, B. Pharm and B.Sc Agri programmes. Of course, English is
conveniently left out of the MBBS and related medical programmers for reasons best
known to the curriculum developers.
Let us for example take the First year of a B.Tech Programme (that runs into 33
weeks) in Electronics and communications Engineering of a JNTU affiliated college. The
courses offered for the programme are with hours of teaching and credits are given below:
S.No Courses Hours per week
1. Introduction to mathematics (MI) 4
2. Mathematical methods (MM) 4
ISSN (ONLINE) : 2349 - 3399 ISSN (PRINT) : 2349 - 3380
IJARRAS Volume 3 Issue 3 Page 1259
3. Applied physics (AP) 4
4. Network analysis 4
5. Electronic devices and circuits (EDC) 4
6. Engineering drawing (ED) 3
7. C programming and data structure (CDS) 4
8. English 3
9. English language communication skills lab (ELCS)
3
10. EDC Lab 3
11. C programming lab 3
12. IT workshop 3
From the table it is very clear that teachers of other courses can make a great
difference in developing the communicative skills of the students. If the teachers of other
courses follow cooperative teaching method (CTM) considerable improvement can be shown,
thus limiting the need for finishing schools that give special employment related training. For
example, if an Applied physics lecturer or an Electronics professor understands that listening
skills play an important part in communication processes, and that they too can develop
listening skills in the students. They can develop patience and desire to understand in the
students. They can encourage them to concentrate on listening and maintain eye contact.
They can also help the student to resist distractions by making him involved in the listening
activity. If the teachers are willing to follow a specific methodology that can lead to
developing the “employability skills” in the students, then there will be reinforcement to what
an English teacher tells them in a communication skills development class. This is where it
can be called co-operative teaching method (CTM). The teachers in a college should
cooperate with one another should be willing to share the responsibility. There should not be
any feeling of division or segregation among the teaching community.
ISSN (ONLINE) : 2349 - 3399 ISSN (PRINT) : 2349 - 3380
IJARRAS Volume 3 Issue 3 Page 1260
In a C programming class, for example the teacher can, while working on a program,
instead of simply transferring the program from text to the blackboard or by projecting it on
to the screen, he can initiate small group discussion among the students as to what kind of a
logic is used and which is the best way of writing a program if the same program can be
written in more than one way. This brings into the class, the dynamics of team learning and
cooperative behavior. Generally, an English teacher is asked to take care of group discussions
of the students and most often they come up with some general topics that are usually outside
the classroom and curriculum. If the computer science teacher or a network analysis professor
follows the do’s and don’ts of group discussion in his class while involving the students in an
interactive way, the net result of student development would be entirely different. These
teachers should believe that GD is all about communicating with a group of people and not
the subject matter of an English teacher. Simple thing like eye contact and body language
work as indices of confidence. By giving the following ‘Dos and ‘Don’ts for GD to the class,
the engineering subject teacher can play a major role in cooperative teaching. Some ‘Dos’ of
a GD are
• Speak pleasantly and politely to the group.
• Remember that a discussion is not an argument.
• Try to stick to the discussion topic. Don’t introduce irrelevant information.
• Be aware of your body language when you are speaking. Some important
Don’ts are
• Lose your temper. A discussion is not an argument.
• Shout Use a moderate tone at a medium pitch.
• Use too many gestures when you speak. Gestures like finger pointing and
table thumping can appear aggressive.
• Interrupt; wait for a speaker to finish what they are saying before you speak.
During the interaction if the teacher facilitates the use of positive language that is
polite, pleasant, practical, percussive and powerful, there is a chance to develop positive
attitude in the students and make them think positively. It is this positive language that
ISSN (ONLINE) : 2349 - 3399 ISSN (PRINT) : 2349 - 3380
IJARRAS Volume 3 Issue 3 Page 1261
creates a positive impact on the student and it helps them to attain their goal and achieve
success. Is it very difficult for a non English teacher to try this out in his classroom?
In this way, any teacher, not just an English teacher, can take up the responsibility of
developing the most needed communication skills among the students in a cooperative way.
There should not be any hesitation in sharing the teaching resources as far as cooperative
teaching is concerned. Language skills and communication skills are essential for getting
good placement in the information technology and I.T Enabled Services, M.N. Cs., public
sector and private sector industries etc. Everyone should revise the language habits from time
to time, in accordance with changing life pattern and customs. As motioned earlier, language
is an expression of human activity and because human activity is constantly changing,
language also changes along with it. It shouldn’t remain the exclusive forte of an English
teacher. Every communicator must know the significance of language which is essential for
effective communication. Be it an Engineering Drawing class or a Mathematics class.
The parameters considered here for analyzing and enhancing the communication
skills of the students are Rural- Urban continuum and Economic Status of the student. While
the communicative efficiency decreased towards the rural end, it showed a considerable
increase towards the urban end.