Transcript

Employment &

Immigration Update

Inside this issue

Outsourcing, a flourishing industry

PHL gains in competitiveness

Labor Force Survey

Re-stamping of new visa imprints in the passports of foreigners who have been granted residency status

Procedure on Minimum Wage Fixing for Domestic Workers

Exemptions from payment of terminal fee

Special points of interest

Supreme Court (SC) Decisions

Labor & Immigration News

SyCipLaw News

Employment in the booming Information Technology-Business Process Outsourcing (IT-BPO)

industry, also called offshoring industry, has reached the million mark—1% of the Philippine

population in mid-2014—up from 900,000 in 2013. The Information Technology and Business

Process Association of the Philippines (IBPAP), the umbrella organization for IT-BPO and Global

in-House Center, sees end-2014 revenues to hit US$18 billion, up from US$15 billion in 2013,

putting the industry on track to attain its 2016 target employment of 1.3 million and revenue of

US$25 billion.

Established 15 years ago, the IT-BPO industry is next to overseas Filipino workers’ remittances

as a source of foreign exchange. The industry consists of contact center services; back offices;

medical, legal, and data transcription; animation; software development; engineering design;

and digital content.

A big number of global corporations have transferred some of their non-core, labor-intensive,

and IT-enabled jobs to the Philippines. It is not just Metro Manila that has BPO facilities; second-

tier cities such as Cebu, Dumaguete, Davao, Iloilo, Bacolod, and Iligan enjoy a flourishing

offshore industry of call centers providing voice and non-voice services. Call center operations

(Continued on page 4)

July-September 2014 Volume XII, Issue 3

Outsourcing, a flourishing industry

PHL gains in competitiveness

The Philippines ranked 52nd out of 144 economies this year—up from 59th out of 148 in the

previous survey—in the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Report 2014-2015,

which assessed markets against “pillars of competitiveness” that drive productivity.

In its current position, the Philippines has already notched a steady improvement of 33 places

since a 2009 plunge which the Forum noted was “the largest over that period among all

countries studies.”

“The results suggest that the reforms of the four years have bolstered the country’s economic

fundamentals,” it added. “The trends across most of the 12 pillars are positive and, in some

cases, truly remarkable.”

Switzerland remained the most competitive in the world for a sixth year, followed by

Singapore, the United States, Finland, Germany, Japan, Hong Kong, the Netherlands, the United

(Continued on page 4)

Quick Quotes from Recent SC Decisions

The company-designated

physician must arrive at a

definite assessment of the

seafarer’s fitness to work or

permanent disability within a

period of 120 or 240 days,

pursuant to Article 192(c)(1)

of the Labor Code and Rule X,

Section 2 of the Amended

Rules on Employees

Compensation (AREC). If he

fails to do so and the

seafarer’s medical condition

remains unresolved, the latter

shall be deemed totally and

permanently disabled. (Fil-

Pride Shipping Company, Inc.,

et al. v. Edgar A. Balasta, G.R.

No. 193047, 03 March 2014).

A Collective Bargaining

Agreement (CBA) is a contract

entered into by an employer

and a legitimate labor

organization concerning the

terms and conditions of

employment. Like any other

contract, it has the force of law

between the parties and, thus,

should be complied with in

good faith. Unilateral changes

or suspensions in the

implementation of the

provisions of the CBA,

therefore, cannot be allowed

without the consent of both

parties. (Wesleyan University-

Philippines v. Wesleyan

University-Philippines Faculty

and Staff Association, G.R. No.

181806, 12 March 2014).

Requirements for compensability of an injury or illness

SC Decision: G.R. No. 199344, 05 March 2014

Under Section 20(B)(6) of the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration-Standard

Employment Contract (POEA-SEC), an injury or illness is compensable when, first, it is work-

related and, second, the injury or illness existed during the term of the seafarer’s employment

contract. Section 32(A) of the 2000 POEA Amended Standard Terms and Conditions further

provides that for an occupational disease and the resulting disability to be compensable, the

following need to be satisfied: (1) the seafarer’s work must involve the risks described; (2) the

disease was contracted as a result of the seafarer’s exposure to the described risks; (3) the

disease was contracted within a period of exposure and under such other factors necessary to

contract it; and (4) there was no notorious negligence on the part of the seafarer.

Respondent-seafarer has been diagnosed to suffer from posterior subscapular cataract on his

right eye and pseudophakia, and posterior capsule opacification on his left eye. For these to be

regarded as occupational diseases, respondent-seafarer had to prove that the risk of

contracting the disease was increased by the conditions under which he worked. The evidence

must be real and substantial, and not merely apparent. It must constitute a reasonable basis for

arriving at a conclusion that the conditions of his employment caused the disease or that such

conditions aggravated the risk of contracting the illness.

Respondent-seafarer did not present substantial proof that his eye ailment was work-related.

Other than his bare claim that paint droppings accidentally splashed on an eye causing blurred

(Continued on page 5)

2

Exemptions from payment of terminal fee

The Manila International Airport Authority (MIAA) has published a Notice regarding the

International Passenger Service Charge (or Terminal Fee) which will be integrated effective 01

October 2014 into the cost of airline ticket at point of sale.

The following are exempt from paying the terminal fee provided they are able to present, at the

point of sale, exemption certificate duly issued by the Philippine Overseas Employment

Administration (POEA) or the MIAA:

a) Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) with Overseas Employment Certificate (OEC) issued by

the POEA;

b) Pilgrims endorsed by the National Commission on Muslim Filipinos with exemption

certificate issued by MIAA;

c) Athletes endorsed by the Philippine Sports Commission with exemption certificate issued

by the MIAA; and

d) Others who are authorized by the Office of the President.

Circumstances when terminal fee will be collected from exempt passengers:

a) Airline tickes purchased online;

b) Airline tickets purchased abroad;

c) If no exemption certificate has been presented when airline ticket is purchased over the

counter from airline office or its travel agent in the Philippines.

To facilitate the refund process for exempted passengers who have been charged the terminal

fee upon purchase of the ticket, the following documents must be presented during refund:

a) OFWs—airport copy of the OEC, and any of the following showing payment of terminal fee:

LI International, E-ticket, Itinerary receipt with official receipt (O.R.) or Invoice, or

boarding pass;

b) For Pilgrims, Athletes and Others—MIAA Exemption Certificate, and any of the following

showing payment of terminal fee: LI International, E-ticket, Itinerary receipt with O.R. or

Invoice, or boarding pass.

(Continued on page 5)

SC Decision: G.R. No. 186621, 12 March 2014

To ascertain the existence of an employer-employee relationship, jurisprudence has invariably

adhered to the four-fold test, to wit: (1) the selection and engagement of the employee; (2) the

payment of wages; (3) the power of dismissal; and (4) the power to control the employee’s

conduct, or the so-called “control test.” In resolving the issue of whether such relationship

exists in a given case, substantial evidence—that amount of relevant evidence which a

reasonable mind might accept as adequate to justify a conclusion—is sufficient. Although no

particular form of evidence is required to prove the existence of the relationship, and any

competent and relevant evidence to prove the relationship may be admitted, a finding that the

relationship exists must nonetheless rest on substantial evidence.

In the case at bar, the Court of Appeals (CA) gave more credence to the declarations of five

former employees of petitioners that respondent was their co-worker in petitioner company.

The SC upheld the conclusion of the CA.

3

Existence of employer-employee relationship

Quick Quotes from Recent SC Decisions

The power to dismiss an

employee is a recognized

prerogative inherent in the

employer’s right to freely

manage and regulate his

business. In protecting the

rights of the laborers, the law

authorizes neither oppression

nor self-destruction of the

employer. The worker’s right

to security of tenure is not an

absolute right, for the law

provides that he may be

dismissed for cause.

(Sutherland Global Services

(Philippines), Inc., et al. v.

Larry S. Labrador, G.R. No.

193107, 24 March 2014).

In a labor case, the written

statements of co-employees

admitting their participation

in a scheme to defraud the

employer are admissible in

evidence. The argument by an

employee that the said

statements constitute hearsay

because the authors thereof

were not presented for their

cross-examination does not

persuade because the rules of

evidence are not strictly

observed in proceedings

before the National Labor

Relations Commission (NLRC),

which are summary in nature

and decisions may be made on

the basis of position papers.

(Venus B. Castillo, et al. v.

Prudential Life Plans, Inc., et

al., G.R. No. 196142, 26 March

2014).

The employer-employee relationship ceases to exist when employees enter into a Service Franchise Agreement with their employer

SC Decision: G.R. No. 171482, 12 March 2014

Petitioner used to work as salesmen of three sister companies collectively called “Bandag”

which offered repair and retread services for used tires. In 1998, however, Bandag developed a

franchising scheme that would enable others to operate tire and retreading businesses using its

trade name and service system.

Petitioners quit their jobs as salesmen and entered into separate Service Franchise Agreements

(SFAs) with Bandag for the operation of their respective franchises. Under the SFAs, Bandag

would provide funding support to the petitioners subject to a regular or periodic liquidation of

their revolving funds. The expenses out of these funds would be deducted from petitioners’

sales to determine their incomes. At first, petitioners managed and operated their respective

franchises without any problem. After a length of time, however, they began to default on their

obligations to submit periodic liquidations of their operational expenses in relation to the

revolving funds Bandag provided them. Consequently, Bandag terminated their respective

SFAs.

(Continued on page 6)

Abandonment of work

SC Decision: G.R. No. 190724, 12 March 2014

Abandonment is the deliberate and unjustified refusal of an employee to resume his

employment. It is a form of neglect of duty that constitutes just cause for the employer to

dismiss the employee.

To constitute abandonment of work, two elements must concur: (1) the employee must have

failed to report for work or must have been absent without valid or justifiable reason; and

(2) there must have been a clear intention [on the part of the employee] to sever the employer-

employee relationship manifested by some overt act. The employee’s absence must be

accompanied by overt acts that unerringly point to the employee’s clear intention to sever the

employment relationship. And to successfully invoke abandonment, whether as a ground for

dismissing an employee or as a defense, the employer bears the burden of proving the

employee’s unjustified refusal to resume his employment. Mere absence of the employee is not

enough.

(Continued on page 7)

Outsourcing, a flourishing industry

have brought socio-economic development in key cities where they are located, resulting in

steady rise in employment.

A 2013 survey by Tholons, a strategic advisory firm for global outsourcing, identified the

Philippines as the “leading call center destination, beating out India.” The country’s advantages

over other nations are: cheaper labor costs; English-speaking workers; modern infrastructure

such as water, power, roads, telecommunications; large pool of college graduates; and good

environment for expatriate trainers and managers. The country also has an affinity with

Western culture.

The United States is the biggest market for call center work done from the Philippines, with the

United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand as emerging markets. The call center industry is

the fastest escalating employment provider for Filipino college graduates who seek jobs that

have better income generation.

[Source: Agence France-Presse, Manila Bulletin, 09102014, p. 11]

(Continued from page 1)

4

Quick Quotes from Recent SC Decisions

A bare claim of strained

relations by reason of

termination is insufficient to

warrant the granting of

separation pay. Likewise, the

filing of the complaint by the

petitioners does not

necessarily translate to

strained relations between the

parties. (Bernard A. Tenazas,

et al. v. R. Villegas Taxi

Transport, et al., G.R. No.

192998, 02 April 2014).

The determination of the

continuing necessity of a

particular officer or position

in a business corporation is a

management prerogative, and

the courts will not interfere

unless arbitrary or malicious

action on the part of the

management is shown. (SPI

Technologies, Inc., et al. v.

Victoria K. Mapua, G.R. No.

191154, 07 April 2014).

A question of law arises when

there is doubt as to what the

law is on a certain state of

facts, while there is a question

of fact when the doubt arises

as to the truth or falsity of the

alleged facts. For a question to

be one of law, the same must

not involve an examination of

the probative value of the

evidence presented by the

litigants or any of them.

(Eugene S. Arabit, et al. v.

Jardine Pacific Finance, Inc.,

etc., G.R. No. 181719, 21 April

2014).

PHL gains in competitiveness

Kingdom, and Sweden. At the bottom, in ascending order, were Guinea, Chad, Yemen,

Mauritania, Angola, Burundi, Sierra Leone, Haiti, Timor-Leste, and Burkina Faso.

In Southeast Asia, the Philippines ranked behind Singapore, Malaysia (20th), Thailand (31st),

and Indonesia (34th). Behind the Philippines were Vietnam (68th), Laos (93rd), Cambodia (95th),

and Myanmar (134th).

The Forum said that the Phlilippine government’s “recent success… in tackling some of the

most pressing structural issues provides evidence that bold reforms can yield positive results

relatively quickly.

[Source: Report by Daryll Edison D. Saclag, Business World 09032014, p. 1/SI]

(Continued from page 1)

Doctrine of piercing the veil of corporate fiction applied

SC Decision: G.R. No. 177493, 19 March 2014

It has long been settled that the law vests a corporation with a personality distinct and separate

from its stockholders or members. In the same vein, a corporation, by legal fiction and

convenience, is an entity shielded by a protective mantle and imbued by law with a character

alien to the persons comprising it. Nonetheless, the shield is not at all times impenetrable and

cannot be extended to a point beyond its reason and policy. Circumstances might deny a claim

for corporate personality, under the “doctrine of piercing the veil of corporate fiction.”

Piercing the veil of corporate fiction is an equitable doctrine developed to address situations

where the separate corporate personality of a corporation is abused or used for wrongful

purposes. Under the doctrine, the corporate existence may be disregarded where the entity is

formed or used for wrongful purposes. Under the doctrine, the corporate existence may be

disregarded where the entity is formed or used for non-legitimate pruposes, such as to evade a

just and due obligation, or to justify a wrong, to sheild or perpetrate fraud, or to carry out

similar or inequitable considerations, other unjustifiable aims or intentions, in which case, the

fiction will be disregarded and the individuals composing it and the two corporations will be

treated as identical.

In the case at bar, petitioner filed an illegal dismissal complaint with money claims against his

former employer CBB Philippines Strategic Property Services, Inc. (CBB). After the decision

(Continued on page 8)

5

Immigration Advisory

The Alien Registration

Program (ARP), a Bureau of

Immigration (BI)-Department

of Justice (DOJ) initiative, aims

to (i) Account; (ii) Register

and re-register; (iii) Capture

Information; (iv) Update BI’s

alien database; and (v)

Provide assistance for visa-

related problems. The ARP

shall be held from 01 October

2014 until 30 September

2015. Aliens may apply at any

authorized BI Regional Office.

Bring a duly filled-out ARP

form (form and additional

information available at

www.immigration.gov.ph)

and any valid identification

(e.g., passport, driver’s

license). Registered aliens

under this program may be

primary beneficiaries of

future social integration/

legalization programs of the

government.

For inquiries, you may contact

the following numbers: +632

465-2400 locals 208, 444 and

447.

[Source: Philippine Star News

09102014 at p. 2].

Quotable Quote

“Four things come not back—

the spoken word, the sped

arrow, the past life, and the

neglected opportunity.” —

Arab Proverb

Image Credit:

Photo on cover: Image courtesy of Microsoft Office.

Photos on pages 8-9: Image courtesy of SyCipLaw Corporate Communications Office

Refund can be done at the (a) Ninoy Aquino International Airport (NAIA) Terminals on the day

of departure 24 hours daily, or (b) Collection Office, Ground Floor, MIAA, Administration

Building, MIA Road, Pasay City, from 8:00 am-5:00 pm, Mondays through Fridays, except

holidays.

Refund by representative may be allowed subject to the presentation of the above-stated

requirements plus a Refund Declaration Form (downloadable from the MIAA website:

www.miaa.gov.ph), and passport or any valid government-issued ID with picture of the

representative. Government-issued IDs, among others, refer to SSS, GSIS, TIN, Senior Citizen’s

ID, or driver’s license.

[Source: Manila Bulletin 09222014 at p. 4]

(Continued from page 2)

Exemptions from payment of terminal fees

vision, he adduced no note or recording of the supposed accident. Nor did he present any

record of some medical check-up, consultation, or treatment that he had undergone. Besides,

while paint droppings can cause eye irritation, such fact alone does not ipso facto establish

compensable disability. Awards of compensation cannot rest on speculations or presumptions.

Respondent-seafarer must prove that the paint droppings caused his blindness.

On the other hand, the findings of the company-designated physician showed that it was

cataract extraction, not paint droppings, that caused respondent-seafarer’s ailment. The

definitions of the imputed medical conditions plainly do not indicate work-relatedness.

Besides, even if it were assumed that respondent-seafarer’s ailment was work-related,

respondent-seafarer still cannot claim disability benefits since he concealed his true medical

condition. The records show that when he underwent pre-employment medical examination

(PEME), he represented that he was merely wearing corrective lens. He concealed the fact that

he had a cataract operation in 2005. he told the truth only when he was being examined at

Medical City on 18 May 2007. This willful concealment of a vital information in his PEME

disqualifies him from claiming disability benefits pursuant to Section 20(E) of the POEA-SEC

which provides that “a seafarer who knowingly conceals and does not disclose past medical

condition, disability and history in the pre-employment medical examination constitutes

fraudulent misrepresentation and shall disqualify him from any compensation and benefits.”

(Continued from page 2)

Requirements for compensability of an injury or illness

Guide to Business Ethics and Anti-Corruption Asia Pacific Laws 2014

SyCipLaw contributed the Philippine chapter of Norton Rose Fulbright’s Guide to Business

Ethics and Anti-Corruption Asia Pacific Laws 2014. The Guide provides an overview of anti-

corruption regimes and related laws in the Asia Pacific context. Aside from the Philippines, it

also covers Australia, Bangladesh, Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, China, Hong Kong, India,

Indonesia, Japan, Macau, Malaysia, Myanmar, New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan,

Thailand and Vietnam.

You may also download the Guide from the Norton Rose Fulbright website

(www.nortonrosefulbright.com).

For further information, please contact SyCipLaw’s Mia G. Gentugaya or Benedicto P.

Panigbatan in the Philippines or Norton Rose Fulbright’s Wilson Ang in Singapore.

6

The employer-employee relationship ceases to exist when employees enter into a Service Franchise Agreement with their employer

Aggrieved, petitioners filed a complaint for constructive dismissal, non-payment of wages,

incentive pay, 13th month pay, and damages against Bandag with the NLRC, contending that

notwithstanding the execution of the SFAs, they remained to be Bandag’s employees, the SFAs

being but a circumvention of their status as regular employees. For its part, Bandag pointed out

that petitioners freely resigned from their employment and decided to avail themselves of the

opportunity to be independent entrepreneurs under the franchise scheme that Bandag had.

Thus, no employer-employee relationship existed between the petitioners and Bandag.

The Labor Arbiter dismissed the complaint on the ground that no employer-employee

relationship existed between Bandag and the petitioners. The NLRC affirmed the Labor

Arbiter’s decision and denied petitioners’ motion for reconsideration. Also, the CA dismissed

petitioners’ certiorari petition ascribing grave abuse of discretion and denied petitioners’

motion for reconsideration.

On appeal to the SC, the majority of the SC Third Division affirmed the rulings of the Labor

Arbiter, the NLRC and the CA. Highlights of the SC majority ruling are:

When petitioners agreed to operate Bandag’s franchise branches in different parts of the

country, they knew that this substantially changed their former relationships. They were to

cease working as Bandag’s salesmen, the positions they occupied before they ventured into

running separate Bandag branches. They were to cease receiving salaries or commissions.

Their incomes were to depend on the profits they made.

It is pointed out that Bandag continued, like an employer, to exercise control over petitioners’

work. It points out that Bandag: (a) retained the right to adjust the price rates of products and

services; (b) imposed minimum processed tire requirement (MPR); (c) reviewed and regulated

credit applications; and (d) retained the power to suspend petitioners’ services for failure to

meet service standards.

But uniformity in prices, quality of services, and good business practices are the essence of all

franchises. A franchisee will damage the franchisor’s business if he sells at different prices,

renders different or inferior services, or engages in bad business practices. These business

contraints are needed to maintain collective responsibility for faultless and reliable service to

the same class of customers for the same prices.

This is not the “control” contemplated in employer-employee relationships. Control in such

relationships address the details of day to day work like assigning the particular task that has

to be done, monitoring the way tasks are done and their results, and determining the time

during which the employee must report for work or accomplish his assigned task.

Franchising involves the use of an established business expertise, trademark, knowledge and

training. As such, the franchisee is required to follow a certain established system. Accordingly,

the franchisors may impose guidelines that somehow restrict the petitioners’ conduct which do

not necessarily indicate “control.” The important factor to consider is still the element of

control over how the work itself is done, not just its end result. The SC cited a case decided in

June 2010 which held that, results wise, the insurance company, as principal, can impose

production quotas upon its independent agents and determine how many individual agents,

with specific territories, such independent agents ought to employ to achieve the company’s

objectives. These are management policy decisions that the labor law element of control cannot

reach. Petitioners’ commitment to abide by Bandag’s policy decisions and implementing rules

as franchisees does not make them its employees.

Petitioners cannot use the revolving funds feature of the SFAs as evidence of their employer-

employee relationship with Bandag. These funds do not represent wages. They are more in the

nature of capital advances for operations that Bandag conceptualized to attract prospective

franchises. Petitioners’ incomes depended on the profits they make, controlled by their

individual abilities to increase sales and reduce operating costs.

The lone 33-page dissenting opinion in the case presents the novel issue of a franchise

agreement being utilized to disguise an employer-employee relationship and to circumvent the

requirement of security of tenure.

(Continued from page 3)

Immigration Advisory

The Alien Registration

Division (ARD) reminds all

registered aliens as follows:

1) Incomplete and/or

improperly accomplished

registration forms shall

be dismissed;

2) To register and secure

the ACR I-Card only

through authorized

persons;

3) To report, in writing,

changes in information

(e.g., civil status,

citizenship, address and

the like) in order to avoid

sanctions, including

imprisonment for not

more than six months;

4) To pay the Annual Report

fee within the first 60

days of each year, unless

exempted by law;

5) To renew ACR I-Cards at

least three months in

advance of pre-scheduled

travels;

6) To check printed data on

the ACR I-Cards and

promptly report errors

and/or discrepancies;

7) To avoid false

statements,

misrepresentation and

fraud in any immigration

matter under pain of visa

cancellation/forfeiture

and/or deportation;

8) To secure regular/paper-

based Emigration

Clearance Certificate

(ECC) 72 hours before

departure for the

(Continued on page 7)

7

following: (a) Holders of

Temporary Visitor’s/

Tourist (9a) Visa, who

stayed for more than six

months; (b) Immigrants

and Non-immigrants

with downgraded or

expired visas except (a);

(c) Immigrants and Non-

immigrants with valid

visas, who are leaving for

good except (a); (d)

Philippine born

temporary visitors, who

are leaving for the first

time; (e) Foreign

nationals with orders to

leave; and (f) Foreign

Seafarers, with BI-

approved discharged,

who stayed for more than

30 days;

9) All ACR I-Card holders

not included above, who

are temporarily leaving

the country may pay ECC

RP/SRC fees at airports.

For queries, please contact:

+632 465-2400 loc. 205

(ARD), email

[email protected]

and

[email protected]

h, or visit the BI social media

accounts on Facebook

(officialbureauofimmigration)

and on Twitter

(@immigrationPH).

[Source: Manila Bulletin

09142014 at p. 6]

Immigration Advisory

(Continued from page 6)

Re-stamping of new visa imprints in the passports of foreigners who have been granted residency status

In the exercise of minimum wage fixing functions, the RTWPBs shall, as far as practicable,

consider, among other relevant factors, the following: (a) needs of workers and their families

(wage adjustment vis-a -vis the consumer price index; poverty threshold); and (b) capacity to

pay (household income; average wage of domestic workers).

Prior to the issuance of a wage order, the RTWPBs shall conduct consultations/hearings with

stakeholders. Separate consultations/hearings may be conducted in determining the minimum

wage of domestic workers in order that issues concerning the sector will be properly

addressed.

Public hearings are encouraged wherein all parties are represented. Public hearings shall be

conducted in a manner that shall ensure that all parties who stand to be directly affected are

given the widest opportunity to be heard.

(Continued from page 10)

Labor Force Survey

The size of the labor force was approximately 41.26 million out of an estimated 64.07 million

population of Filipinos 15 years and older, for a participation rate of 64.4%. This was higher

than last year’s 63.9%.

LFS results for July 2014 and 2013 excluded Leyte, which bore the brunt of typhoon Yolanda

that tore through Central Philippines in November 8-9 last year.

Most of the new jobs were created in the service and industry sectors, raising employment

rates slightly. Hiring in the service sector improved to 54% from 53.5% while employment in

the industry sector rose to 15.9% from 15.7%. On the other hand, workers in the agriculture

sector accounted for 30.1% of the country’s employed, down from last year’s 30.8%. Among the

underemployed, 17.3% were in industry, up from 16.3%, LFS results showed.

Survey results also showed that part-time workers, or those working less than 40 hours a week,

now made up 36.2% of the employed, up from 34.3%; while full-time workers, or those who

worked at least 40 hours a week, fell to 62.7% from 65%. This consequently brought down the

mean hours worked in one week to 40.9 from 40.9 from 41.8.

[Source: Business World, 09112014, 99. 1-2/SI]

(Continued from page 10)

Procedure on Minimum Wage Fixing for Domestic Workers

Any violation or non-compliance of the Order may result in the: (a) deactivation and

cancellation of ACR I-Card; (b) imposition of fines and penalties; (c) referral to the Intelligence

Division and Legal Division for investigation and institution of deportation proceedings;

(d) non-issuance of Emigration Clearance Certificate (ECC); and/or (e) denial of arrival/

departure clearances.

The BI Operations Order was issued in order to establish the accurate census of active foreign

nationals who have been granted residency status.

(Continued from page 10)

Abandonment of Work

In the case at bar, the SC held that the petitioner-employers failed to prove the alleged

abandonment of work by the respondent-employee, and affirmed the CA decision which

regarded the respondent-employee as having been constructively dismissed for the failure of

petitioners-employers to prove the alleged just cause—abandonment—for the dismissal of the

respondent-employee.

(Continued from page 3)

8

Labor and Employment News

The Employment

Compensation Commission

(ECC) has signed agreements

with 21 medical service

providers that will expand

coverage of health assistance

programs for occupationally-

disabled workers (ODW)

nationwide. The agreements

provide compensation to

employees who suffered work

-related accidents or sickness.

[Source: Manila Bulletin

National News 09092014 at p.

4]

The Department of Labor and

Employment (DOLE) has

intensified its Health and

Wellness Program by

providing free healthcare

services to its employees. The

program covers preventive

health care, health education,

and in-house medical services.

DOLE has provided three free

healthcare services—

influenza vaccination,

awareness campaign on

Vitamin D deficiency, and

medical check-up (blood

glucose screening, body mass

index determination and body

fat analysis, and body

temperature and blood

pressure check). DOLE’s

Human Resource and

Development Service has

partnered with several

pharmaceutical companies to

deliver the healthcare

(Continued on page 9)

rendered by the Labor Arbiter Reyno in favor of the petitioner, the parties entered into a

Compromise Agreement with the approval of Labor Arbiter Reyno. Under the agreement,

petitioner was to receive US$31,000 in full satisfaction of the Labor Arbiter Reyno’s decision

broken down into US$13,000 to be paid by CBB upon the signing of the agreement; US$9,000

on or before 30 June 2003; and US$9,000 on or before 30 September 2003. Further, the

agreement provided that unless and until the agreement is fully satisfied, CBB shall not: (1) sell,

alienate or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of its assets or business; (2) suspend,

discontinue, or cease its entire, or a substantial portion of its business operations;

(3) substantially change the nature of its business; and (4) declare bankruptcy or insolvency.

CBB paid the initial amount of US$13,000, but not the next two installments as CBB ceased

operations.

Petitioner later discovered the organization of another corporation, respondent Binswanger

Philippines, Inc., claiming that this new corporation and CBB are one and the same corporation,

pointing out that CBB stands for Chesterton Blumenauer Binswanger. Invoking the doctrine of

piercing the veil of corporate fiction, petitioner prayed that an alias writ of execution be issued

against respondents Binswanger Philippines, Inc. and Keith Elliott, CBB’s former President, and

now Binswanger’s President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO). Labor Arbiter Laderas denied

petitioner’s motion for an alias writ of execution, holding that the doctrine of piercing the

corproate veil was inapplicable in the case. Petitioner filed an appeal which the NLRC granted,

reversing Labor Arbiter Laderas’ order and declared respondents jointly and severally liable

with CBB for Labor Arbiter Reyno’s decision in favor of petitioner. The respondents then

appealed to the CA which reversed the NLRC decision and reinstated Labor Arbiter Laderas’

order.

In setting aside the CA decision, the SC saw an indubitable link between CBB’s closure and

Binswanger’s incorporation. CBB ceased to exist only in name; it re-emerged in the person of

Binswanger for an urgent purpose—to avoid payment by CBB of the last two installments of its

monetary obligation to petitioner, as well as its other financial liabilities. Freed of CBB’s

liabilities, espeically that owing to petitioner, Binswanger can continue, as it did continue, CBB’s

real estate brokerage business.

(Continued from page 4)

Doctrine of piercing the veil of corporate fiction applied

Multilaw Visit to Manila

Multilaw Chairman

Charles Brooks and

Executive Director

Adam Cooke visited the

SyCipLaw Makati offices

last July 28. Brooks is a

partner at Penningtons

Solicitors LLP and took

over as chairman from

Mark Lowndes in

October 2013. Cooke, on

the other hand, was

Multilaw’s Global Head

of Development prior to

becoming executive director in May 2013. They met with the firm’s partners and counsels,

including Managing Partner Rafael A. Morales; Senior Counsels Andres G. Gatmaitan and

Llewellyn L. Llanillo; Banking, Finance and Securities Head Mia G. Gentugaya; and Employment

and Immigration Head Luisito V. Liban.

SyCipLaw is a member firm of Multilaw. For more information, please visit www.multilaw.com.

In photo (left to right): Hector M. de Leon, Jr., Maria Teresa D. Mercado-Ferrer, Leslie C. Dy, Luisito V. Liban,

Llewellyn L. Llanillo, Andres G. Gatmaitan, Adam Cooke, Charles Brooks, Rafael A. Morales, Mia G. Gentugaya,

and Marievic G. Ramos-Añonuevo.

9

services. [Source: Manila

Bulletin National News

09102401 at p. 6]

Another 40 domestic ships are

operating with world-class

labor standards after

complying with the Maritime

Labor Convention of 2006

(MLC). The ships complying

with the convention are

owned by 15 local shipping

companies, and the ships have

been issued with certificates

of compliance to the MLC

under the new Labor Laws

Compliance System. [Source:

Manila Bulletin News

08292014 at p. 4]

DOLE is helping workers

make ends meet with the

organization of “Diskwento

Caravans” all over the

country. With the Diskwento

Caravan, the government ties

up with large manufacturers

and distributors to urge them

to sell their goods and

commodities at a discounted

price. It is one of the

mechanisms of the

government to provide relief

to workers through non-wage

benefits, and a way for

workers to augment their

income and help them cope

with rising prices of basic

goods and services. [Source:

Manila Bulletin National News

09032014 at p. 6]

Labor and Employment News

(Continued from page 8)

Employment & Immigration Department

SyCip Salazar Hernandez & Gatmaitan’s Human Resource Practice Group has been renamed

Employment and Immigration Department (EID). This change was approved by the Executive

Committee on September 3, 2014.

Philip Wood’s International legal risk for banks and corporates

First Law International Conducts Training on FCPA

First Law

International

(FLI) Principal

Orlando J.

Casares

conducted a

training session

with SyCipLaw

partners and

associates on

the Foreign

Corrupt

Practices Act

(FCPA) last

August 19. The

training is a certification program conducted by FLI exclusively with its member firms.

For more information on FLI, please visit www.first-law.com.

Photo, left to right: Ferdinand Richard Michael M. Manotoc, Il-Young Choi, Francis Paolo P. Tiopianco, Diana S.

Gervacio, Rose Marie M. King-Dominguez, Marie Corinne T. Balbido, Carlos Roberto Z. Lopez, Diana Grace L.

Uy, Maria Teresa D. Mercado-Ferrer, Tracy Anne A. Ong, Arlene M. Maneja, Orlando Casares, Leslie C. Dy,

Hector M. de Leon Jr., Rafael A. Morales, and Ricardo Ma. P.G. Ongkiko.

SyCip

Salazar

Hernandez

&

Gatmaitan

hosted

Philip

Wood,

head of

Allen &

Overy’s

Global Law

Intelligence Unit, last September 18. Wood met with counsels of banks and financial

institutions to discuss his current project on international legal risk for banks and corporates.

His talk also covered the reasons for the intensification of law and the significant increases in

international legal risks, the demand for lawyers and their role in the future, as well as

forecasting the outlook for lawyers and the law.

Copies of the International legal risk for banks and corporates — volume 1 and volume 2 are

available for download from the Allen & Overy website (www.allenovery.com).

In photo (left to right:) Mia G. Gentugaya, Arlene M. Maneja, Simeon Ken R. Ferrer, Gian Sambalido, Vicente D.

Gerochi, Arlene Lapuz-Oreta, Imelda A. Manguiat, Philip Wood, Rafael A. Morales, Raymond Ibon, Ronald Allen

Abarquez, Elvin Michael L. Cruz, Rica Matute Dineros, Sherma Cecile Miranda, Noravir Gealogo, Roy Magturo,

Angelita Cortez, Ildefonso Jimenez.

Results of the Labor Force Survey (LFS) conducted by the Philippine Statistics Authority in July

2014 put the unemployment rate at 6.7%, improving from the 7.3% recorded in the same

month last year. This was equivalent to 2.78 million Filipinos, down from 2.96 million a year

earlier.

In absolute terms, the number of employed Filipinos increased by 2.8% to 38.45 million as of

that month from 37.39 million a year ago, bringing the total number of new jobs generated to

1.06 million.

Underemployment rate—the proportion of those already working but still looking for more

work or longer working hours—improved to 18.3% or 7.05 million workers from 19.2%,

equivalent to 7.17 million workers.

(Continued on page 7)

Labor Force Survey

Managing Partner: Rafael A.

Morales

Employment and

Immigration Department

(EID) Head: Luisito V. Liban

Of Counsel, Editor-in-Chief:

Juan C. Reyes, Jr.

Of Counsel: Rene Y. Soriano

Partners: Lozano A. Tan,

Dante T. Pamintuan, Leslie C.

Dy, Amer Hussein N.

Mambuay, Rodelle B. Bolante,

Marianne M. Miguel, Russel L.

Rodriguez, Marietta A.

Tibayan, Ronald Mark C. Lleno

Senior Associates: Ruben P.

Acebedo II, Maria Jennifer Z.

Barreto, Romeo D. Lumagui,

Jr., Rosalyn S. Co-Uy

Associates: Leah C. Abutan,

Austin Claude S. Alcantara,

Aldous Benjamin C. Camiso,

Easter Princess U. Castro,

Barbara Anne A. Gandionco,

Joanna Marie O. Joson, Earla

Kahlila Mikhaila C. Langit,

Roselle Jean L. Nonato, Tracy

Anne A. Ong, Emmar Benjoe B.

Panahon, Agatha Kristy F.

Ramos, Maria Viola B. Vista

Coordinators: Susan P.

An onuevo, Katherine Mae P.

Sarmiento, Eden Marie Gem B.

Silvela, Evelyn L. Valerio

Feedback and Inquiries:

[email protected]

Publisher’s Note: Employment & Immigration Update is published by the Employment & Immigration Department of SyCip Salazar Hernandez & Gatmaitan (SyCipLaw) as part of its

services to its clients and is not intended for public circulation to non-clients. It is intended to provide general information on legal topics current at the time of printing. Its contents do not

constitute legal advice and should in no circumstances be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice should be sought in particular matters. Reproduction of this Update or any portion thereof

is not authorized without the prior written consent of SyCipLaw.

Re-stamping of new visa imprints in the passports of foreigners who have been granted residency status

Bureau of Immigration (BI) Operations Order No. SBM-2004-035 dated 18 August 2014 has set

a period commencing on 15 September 2014 and ending on 15 December 2014, unless

extended by the Commissioner of Immigration, for foreigners granted residency status under

RA No. 7919, as amended by RA No. 8247, with old RA No. 7919 visa imprints stamped in their

valid passports or other travel documents, to report to the BI RA No. 7919 Unit, BI Main Office,

Intramuros, Manila, for the re-stamping of the new RA No. 7919 visa imprints in their valid

passports or other travel documents.

The concerned foreigners shall submit their: (a) valid passport or other travel document with

previously-stamped RA No. 7919 old visa imprint; and (b) valid Alien Certificate of Registration

Identity Card (ACR I-Card). Within 48 hours from receipt therof, the RA No. 7919 Unit and Alien

Registration Division (ARD) shall verify and confirm its authenticity and genuineness.

(Continued on page 7)

Procedure on Minimum Wage Fixing for Domestic Workers

The National Wages and Productivity Commission (NWPC) has issued NWPC Guidelines No. 1

Series of 1914 prescribing rules to govern proceedings in the fixing of minimum wage rates for

domestic workers.

Under the rules, and pursuant to the authority vested under Section 24 of RA 10361, the

Regional Tripartite Wages and Productivity Board (RTWPB) shall, without need of any petition

or directive from the NWPC, review and, if proper, determine and adjust the minimum wage

rates in the region.

The RTWPB shall conduct an annual review of the prevailing minimum wages of domestic

workers. Such review may be synchronized with the review of other wage rates involving

establishments and/or industries in the region.

(Continued on page 7)


Recommended