7/28/2019 Rice Husk Ash-lime Blended Building Bricks
1/8
302 International Journal of Earth Sciences and EngineeringISSN 0974-5904, Vol. 03, No. 02, April 2010, pp. 302-309
#02030316 Copyright 2010 CAFET-INNOVA TECHNICAL SOCIETY. All rights reserved.
Rice Husk Ash - Lime Blended Building Bricks
DRS.M.ALI JAWAIDCivil Engineering Department, M M M Engineering College, Gorakhpur-273010, India
Email: [email protected]
Abstract: There is a great demand for environmentally safe reuse of rice husk ash thanks
to high rate of its generation in India. This is also need of time to develop alternate methodsof brick manufacturing in order to reduce the use of fertile soil in brick manufacturing, thus,protecting it for agricultural use. Utilization of rice husk ash with lime in brick manufacturing
is reported in this paper. It is found that building bricks prepared by adding 6% of rice husk
ash and 2% of lime with alluvial silts, exhibits compressive strength of 106 kg/cm 2 andwater absorption of 15%.
Keywords:Ash Utilization, Rice Husk Ash, Bricks, Building Industry, Flyash, Waste Disposal
Introduction:
Rice milling generates a by product know as
husk. This surrounds the paddy grain.During milling of paddy about 78 % of
weight is received as rice, broken rice andbran and rest 22 % of the weight of paddy is
received as husk. This husk is used as fuel
in the rice mills to generate steam for theparboiling process. This husk contains about75 % organic volatile matter and the
balance 25 % of the weight of this husk is
converted into ash during the firing process,is known as rice husk ash ( RHA ). This RHA
in turn contains around 85 % - 90 %amorphous silica (Jaturapitakkul and
Roongreung, 2003, Gambhir 1995). So forevery ton of paddy milled, about 220 kgs
(22 %) of husk is produced, and when this
husk is burnt in the boilers, about 40 kgs(20 %) of RHA is generated (Mehta 1986).
India is a major rice producing country, andthe husk generated during milling is mostly
used as a fuel in the boilers for processingpaddy, producing energy through direct
combustion and / or by gasification. About
20 million tones of RHA are producedannually(Srivastava, 2005). It is classified
as pozzolanic material according to ASTMC168 (1997 d). Hydrated (or slaked) lime is
very effective in treating clays and silts.Lime reacts chemically with available silica
and alumina in soils. Natural cement
composed of calcium alumino-silicatecomplexes is formed, which causes acementing action. The strength of lime
stabilized soil is generally improved due to
formation of cementing material. Alluvial soil
deposit in Indo-gangetic plains of India,predominantly, consists of silts of low tomedium compressibility (ML/MI). These
deposits are rich in alumina and silica. The
water holding capacity of this soil is around45%. The objective of this research is toutilize the pozolanic effect of rice husk ash
in presence of lime and water for makinghighly cementious and durable bricks usinglocally available alluvial soils. This will not
only reduce the use of fertile soil of this
region for brick manufacturing but also,reduce the waste disposal volume to make abetter world.
Materials and Methods:
Materials used in this experimental program
consist of rice husk ash (RHA), hydrated
lime (HL) and Low/Medium compressibilitySilt (ML/MI). RHA was collected fromfurnaces located at different industrial units
in Gorakhpur industrial area. The ash
obtained is sieved through 75 micronsIndian Standard Sieve in order to remove
the unburnt portion of ash. The major
chemical and physical properties of RHA aregiven in Table 1. The commercially available
unslaked lime is used in this study. It waspulverized, sieved through 425 micron
Indian standard sieve and stored inpolyethylene bag in desiccators. Localalluvial soils were collected for this
experimental study. The importantengineering and chemical properties of soilis given in Table 2. It is reported that 2% of
lime when added with rice husk ash and
7/28/2019 Rice Husk Ash-lime Blended Building Bricks
2/8
303DR S. M. ALI JAWAID
International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering
ISSN 0974-5904, Vol. 03, No. 02, April 2010, pp. 302-309
alluvial soil gave maximum strength(Srivastava, 2005). Thus, 2% of lime was
added with soil and rice husk ash in this
study. Bricks were prepared by mixing theRHA, lime and local alluvial soil in variousproportions and conventional brick making
technique was adopted (Figures 1 and 2).Improvement in the engineering propertiesof the brick, so produced, was studied. The
percentage of RHA and lime were increased
at regular interval and its effect on thecompressive strength of the brick was alsostudied. The same process continued till the
RHA-lime-soil mix proportion exhibit adecline in strength.
Results and Discussion:
The effect of mix proportion on strength,water adsorption capacity and density etc.
were studied experimentally and results aretabulated in Table 3. Discussion on results isgiven in subsequent section.
Compressive Strength of Brick:
Compressive strength of bricks at differentpercentage of rice husk ash is shown in Fig.3. It is evident from Table 3 that the
compressive strength of brick so formed
increases with increase in rice husk ashcontent but decreases with the increase inrice husk ash content beyond 6%. Lime
reacts with fine pozzolanic component toform calcium-silicate gel with soil particles.The silicate gel proceeds immediately to
coat and bind soil particles. In time this gel
gradually crystallized into well definedcalcium silicate hydrates such astobermorite and hillebrandite. The reaction
ceases on drying and very dry soils will notreact with lime or cement (Srivastava, 2005,Ingles, 1972). The mechanism of reaction
can be represented asNaS4H + CH NH +CAS4HNS +degradation product NH+C2SH WhereS=SiO2, H=H2O, A=Al2O3, C=CaO, N=Na2Oand C2SH are the cementitious mixture and
contribute to the compressive strength ofbrick. At an optimum ash percentage, ahomogeneous gel formation will take place
in the entire soil mass in which all the soilparticles will be involved in pozzolanicreaction, which hardens to form
cementitious products rendering maximum
compressive strength. Any further increasein ash content will result in excess of rice
husk ash which remain unused and prevents
the soil particles from point to point contact.The soil grains will float in the matrix ofunused ash, resulting in reduction of
compressive strength.
Density of Brick:
It is observed that the density of brick
decreases as the percentage of additive(Rice husk ash) increases (Fig. 4). Since thedensity of the additive (ash) is equal to 0.53
t/m3, it will float in water. The mixing wasdone with soil by proportion of weight; agreat volume of additive will replace the soilvolume because of their lower density. This
leads to reduction in the density of thebrick.
Water Absorption of Brick:
The major factor affecting the durability ofbrick is water absorption. The lessinfiltration of water in the brick, the more
durable is the brick. So, the internalstructure of brick must be intensive enoughto prevent the intrusion of water. The water
absorption was determined by using the
procedures described in ASTM C67-00(2000). Fig 5 shows the result of waterabsorption test for various percentage of
rice husk ash-lime soil mixture. It is foundthat water adsorption property of preparedbrick decreases initially with an increase in
ash content (Fig 5) up to optimum ash
content of 6%. However, it increasesafterwards. This is due to fact that additionof additive (ash) to the soil generates the
desired heat of hydration which starts thepozzolanic reaction resulting in gelformation. At an optimum ash percentage, a
homogeneous gel formation takes place in
which all the soil particles will be involve inpozzolanic reaction leading to formation of
less porous hard cementitious product. Anyfurther increase in ash proportion in soil will
result in excess of ash which remainsunused and prevents the soil particles from
point to point contact leading to increase in
porosity.
7/28/2019 Rice Husk Ash-lime Blended Building Bricks
3/8
304 Rice Husk Ash - Lime Blended Building Bricks
International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering
ISSN 0974-5904, Vol. 03, No. 02, April 2010, pp. 302-309
Scanning Electron Micrographs
Observations:
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)technique has been used to visualize the
nature of structure of the brick before andafter the addition of optimum ash content.
The SEM of brick formed with out additive
(ash) and with additive at magnification1546X is shown in Fig. 6 and Fig. 7
respectively. From the micrograph, it can beseen that in conventional brick there are lot
of aggregated packets of soil particles (Fig.6). The soil particles are assembled in such
a manner to give higher density and less
porosity. Fig. 7 shows the SEM of brickformed after mixing with additive (ash) at
optimum percentage. The homogeneous gelformation due to pozzolanic reaction is
distinctly seen in the entire soil mass. Thesilica gel cemented the soil particles to form
aggregates crumbs which make the entiresoil mass becoming porous.
Economic Analysis:
Economic analysis was carried out to
compare the cost of the construction of brickusing conventional soil as well as soil mixed
with optimum percentage of ash. Thedetailed calculation is given elsewhere
(Raghatate, 2003). The above analysis
reveals the following:
1. There is saving of IRs. 0.80 (US $ 0.016)per brick, if the brick is formed with addingoptimum percentage of rice husk ash.
2. By using rice husk ash-lime mixed brick,there is saving of 0.119 m3 of virgin and
fertile soil per one thousand bricks.
Conclusions:
Based on the results obtained in this study,
the following conclusions are drawn:
1. Rice husk ash may be successfully usedfor making bricks. It is found that 6% of ash
with 2% lime is optimum percentage to bemixed with Inorganic silt (ML).
2. Compressive strength of the bricksformed by adding optimum ash and lime is
106.0 kg/cm2. Thus, the bricks so formed
may be classified as 100 class (I class) brickas per Indian Standards (IS: 1077-1976).
3. Rice husk ash-lime mixed bricks arelighter in weight as compared to
conventional brick. It is due to fact that thedensity of ash is less than the soil.
4. It is found that water adsorption property
of prepared brick decreases initially with anincrease in ash content up to optimum ashcontent of 6% and 2% lime content.
However, it increases afterwards.5. Rice husk ash mixed bricks are showinghigher water absorption than the
conventional bricks.
6. There is saving of Indian Rupees 0.80(US$ 0.016) per brick, if the brick is formedwith adding optimum percentage of rice
husk ash. Also, there is saving of 0.119 m3of virgin and fertile soil per one thousandbricks.
Reference:
[1] ASTM (1997). Standard Specificationfor Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined NaturalPozzolan for use as a Mineral Admixture inPortland Cement Concrete, C618-94a,Annual book of ASTM standards, Vol. 04.02,pp. 294-296.
[2] ASTM (2000). Standard Test Methodfor Sampling and Testing Brick andStructural Clay Tile. C67-00, Annual book of
ASTM standards, Vol. 04.05, pp. 41-51.
[3] Gambhir, M. L. (1995). ConcreteTechnology. 2nd Ed. McGraw Hill, New Delhi ,pp. 286-287.
[4] Indian Standard (1976). Specificationof Burnt Clay Bricks (IS: 1077). Bureau ofIndian Standards, New Delhi.
[5] Jaturapitakkul, C and Roongreung, B.(2003). Cementing Material from CalciumCarbide Residue-Rice Husk Ash. Journal ofMaterials in Civil Engg, ASCE, Vol. 15, No. 5,
pp. 470-475.[6] Mehta, P. K. (1986) ConcreteStructures, Properties and Materials.
Prentice Hall, Englewood cliffs, N. J. , pp.
266, 273.[7] Raghatate, S. (2003). Techno-Economic Feasibility Study of Agro-Waste(Ash) Utilization in Brick Industry. M. Tech.
Dissertation, U.P. Technical University,India, pp. 80.
[8] Srivastava, A. (2005). EnvironmentalManagement of Rice Husk Ash Produced inGIDA Project Area, Gorakhpur. M. Tech.Dissertation, U.P. Technical University,
India, pp. 100.
7/28/2019 Rice Husk Ash-lime Blended Building Bricks
4/8
305DR S. M. ALI JAWAID
International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering
ISSN 0974-5904, Vol. 03, No. 02, April 2010, pp. 302-309
Table 1: Engineering and Chemical Properties of Rice Husk Ash
Engineering Properties Chemical Composition
S.No.
PropertyTypicalvalue
S.No.
ConstituentTypical
Value, %
1 Specific gravity, G 2.23 1 SiO2 88.00
2 Percent retained on 75 sieve 17.5 2 K2O 4.503 Percent passing 75 sieve 82.5 3 CaO 0.55
4 Atterbergs limitsNon-
plastic4 MgO 0.35
5 pH value 7.93 5 SO32- 0.24
6 Water Holding Capacity, % 93.9 6 Al2O3 0.15
7 Bulk Density, t/m3 0.53 7 Fe2O3 0.16
Table 2: Engineering and Chemical Properties of Soil
Engineering Properties Chemical Composition
S.
No.Property
Typical
value
S.
No.Constituent
Typical Value,
%
1 Specific gravity, G 2.70 1 Total Soluble Solids 0.842 Sand Content, % 15.00 2 CaCO3 12.14
3 Silt Content, % 85.00 3 Si 18.72
4 Atterbergs limitsNon-
plastic4 Al 37.42
5 pH value 7.70 5 Fe2O3 2.11
6Water Holding Capacity,
%44.62
7 Bulk Density, t/m3 1.80
8 I. S. Classification ML
Table 3: Engineering Properties of Tested Brick Samples
S. No. % of rice huskash mixed
% of limemixed
Compressivestrength,kg/cm2
Density ofbrickt/m3
WaterAbsorption,%
1 2.0 2.0 96.50 1.76 15.65
2 4.0 2.0 102.50 1.62 14.50
3 6.0 2.0 106.00 1.50 14.21
4 8.0 2.0 96.15 1.45 15.10
5 10.0 2.0 86.18 1.39 19.52
7/28/2019 Rice Husk Ash-lime Blended Building Bricks
5/8
306 Rice Husk Ash - Lime Blended Building Bricks
International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering
ISSN 0974-5904, Vol. 03, No. 02, April 2010, pp. 302-309
Figure 1: Moulding of Rice Husk Ash Mixed Brick
Figure 2: Finished Rice Husk Ash-Lime-Soil Mixed Brick
7/28/2019 Rice Husk Ash-lime Blended Building Bricks
6/8
307DR S. M. ALI JAWAID
International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering
ISSN 0974-5904, Vol. 03, No. 02, April 2010, pp. 302-309
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Rice Husk Ash, %
CompressiveStrength
,kg/cm
2
Figure 3: Effect of Rice Husk Ash Percentage on Compressive Strength of Brick.
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Rice Husk Ash, %
Density,
t/m3
Figure 4: Effect RHA Percentage on Density of Brick
7/28/2019 Rice Husk Ash-lime Blended Building Bricks
7/8
308 Rice Husk Ash - Lime Blended Building Bricks
International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering
ISSN 0974-5904, Vol. 03, No. 02, April 2010, pp. 302-309
12
14
16
18
20
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Rice Husk Ash, %
WaterAbsorption,%
Water absorption criteria for
1st class brick: Below 15%
Figure 5: Effect of RHA Percentage on Water Absorption Properties of Bricks
Figure 6: SEM of Conventional Brick Formed Without Addition of Ash.
7/28/2019 Rice Husk Ash-lime Blended Building Bricks
8/8
309DR S. M. ALI JAWAID
International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering
ISSN 0974-5904, Vol. 03, No. 02, April 2010, pp. 302-309
Figure 7: SEM of Brick Formed after Mixing Soil with Optimum Ash Content.