Transcript
Page 1: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

Alan McSweeney

Page 2: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 2

Why Does This Happen?

The Big Idea

The Big FailureAnd Continue To Happen Time and

Again?

And What Can Be Done to Stop It?

Reduced Functionality

Requiring Manual

Workarounds

Not What Is Wanted Or What Was Required/ Envisaged

Too Late

Too Expensive

High Cost Of Operation

Not Scalable And/Or Poor Performance

Lack Of Integration

Requires Rework Or

Replacement

Page 3: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 3

Spectrum Of Failures

Complete Project Success:

On-time, On-budget and Delivering

Specified Benefits

Project Late and/or Over

Budget

More Expensive to Operate Than

Planned

Performance and/or Operational

Problems

Specified Business Benefits and Savings Not

Delivered

Functionality Delivered Does not

Meet Business Requirements

Significant Rework

Required

Solution Largely Unused And/Or

Unusable

Complete Project Failure: Cancelled, Unused, Rejected

Increasing Frequency/ Probability of Occurrence

Page 4: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 4

What Is The Role Of The Chief Skeptical Officer?

• Role with end-to-end view and responsibility from idea definition to delivery

• Provide positive skepticism around idea definition and solution specification

• Be an independent voice

• Be an advocate for and champion of standards

• Maintain a repository of learning and standards

• Embed learning into the organisation

Page 5: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 5

The Key Functions Of The Chief Skeptical Officer

Provide Independent Oversight of Decisions

Ensure Rational Decision-Making

Remove Arbitrariness, Relativity And

Subjectivity

Identify and Eliminate Behavioural And Other

Biases On Decision-Making

Ensure Evidence-Based Judgements

Require Assertions To Be Well Supported By

Evidence

Track End-To-End View From Concept To

Delivery

Question Assumptions, Attitudes Of

Knowledge, Opinions and Beliefs Stated As

Facts

Avoid Systematic Distortion and

Misrepresentation

Page 6: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 6

The Journey From Idea To Successful Operation

Idea, Business Need, Business

Benefits

Process Definition and

Solution Design

Costing -Implementation and Operational

Solution Implementation

and Delivery

Solution Operation

Benefits Realised

Page 7: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 7

The Journey From Idea To Successful Operation

Idea, Business Need, Business

Benefits

Process Definition and

Solution Design

Costing -Implementation and Operational

Solution Implementation

and Delivery

Solution Operation

Benefits Realised

But Promised Benefits All Too Frequently Not

Delivered

Page 8: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 8

Frequently Too Many Handoffs On The Journey From Idea To Successful Operation

Idea, Business Need, Business

Benefits

Process Definition and

Solution Design

Costing -Implementation and Operational

Solution Implementation

and Delivery

Solution Operation

Benefits Realised

Handoff and Information Loss

Handoff and Information Loss

Handoff and Information Loss

Handoff and Information Loss

Handoff and Information Loss

“Chinese Whisper”Effect as Initial

Concept Moves to Implementation

Page 9: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 9

What Causes the Disconnect From Idea To Delivery

Idea, Business Need, Business

Benefits

Process Definition and

Solution Design

Costing -Implementation and Operational

Solution Implementation

and Delivery

Solution Operation

Benefits Realised

Too Many Handoffs Between Stages, Too Often Separate Teams,

Miscommunication, Issues Left Unresolved, Assumptions M

ade, No One With End-

To-End View or End-To-End Responsibility

Page 10: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 10

What Can Go Wrong Along The Journey From Idea To Successful Operation

Idea, Business Need, Business

Benefits

Process Definition and

Solution Design

Costing -Implementation and Operational

Solution Implementation

and Delivery

Solution Operation

Benefits Realised

Poorly Defined Need, Benefits Exaggerated

Inadequate Analysis, Poor Or Incomplete

Design

Overly Optimistic Initial and Operational Cost

Estimates

Poor Requirements Analysis, Poor Design,

Poor Management

Slow, Unreliable, Expensive To Operate,

Not Integrated, Requires Manual

Workarounds

Promised/Expected Benefits Not Delivered

Page 11: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 11

Cost of Fixing Errors During Project Lifecycle

Process Definition and

Solution Design

Costing -Implementation and Operational

Solution Implementation

and Delivery

Benefits Realised

Idea, Business Need, Business

Benefits

Solution Operation

Errors/ gaps/ omissions become significantly more expensive to fix at later stages of the

solution

Relative cost to remediate errors at the end can be 50-100 (or more) times more

expensive than at the start

Page 12: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 12

Chief Skeptical Officer’s Role Is To Take End-To-End View To

Ensure That The Start Delivers And Can Deliver The End

Role Of The Chief Skeptical Officer Is To Take End-To-End View, Enforce Discipline and Perform Reviews

Idea, Business Need, Business

Benefits

Process Definition and

Solution Design

Costing -Implementation and Operational

Solution Implementation

and Delivery

Solution Operation

Benefits Realised

Getting It Right Here …

… Reduces/ Avoids Problems

Here

Page 13: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 13

What Is The Chief Skeptical Officer Trying To Protect You Against?

• Cognitive Bias – Poor or inaccurate judgements, illogical interpretations and decisions, characterised by patterns of behaviour

• Strategic Misrepresentation – Deliberate misrepresentation in budgeting caused by distorted incentives

• Planning Fallacy – Systematic tendency to underestimate how long it will take to complete a task even when there is past experience of similar tasks over-running

• Optimism Bias – Systematic tendency to be overly optimistic about the outcome of actions

• Focalism – Systematic tendency to become inwardly focussed and to lose situational awareness and appreciation of wider context during times of stress

Page 14: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 14

Cognitive Bias - Types

• Many classifications and types of cognitive bias

• Can be very difficult to avoid because of their embedded nature and emotional/irrational basis

−Decision-Making and Behavioural Biases - affecting belief formation and business decisions

− Probability and Belief Biases - affecting way in which information is gathered and assessed

−Attributional Biases - affecting the determination what was responsible for an event or action

• Cognitive biases are very real and can have damaging effects

Page 15: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 15

Decision-Making And Behavioural Biases

• Relying too heavily on one piece of information when making a decision -Anchoring

• Believing things because many others believe the same – Bandwagon

• Assigning greater weight to apparently dominant factors – Attention Bias

• Interpreting information so as to that confirms preconceptions – Confirmation

• Seeing oneself as less biased than others –Blind Spot

• Strong preference for immediate payoffs relative to later ones – Hyperbolic Discounting

• Greater preferences just because of familiarity - Exposure Effect

• Paying more attention and giving more weight to the negative rather than the positive – Negativity Bias

• Looking for information even when it cannot affect action – Information Bias

• Placing too much importance on one aspect - Focusing Effect

• Looking to reduce a small risk to zero rather than a greater reduction of a larger risk – Zero-Risk Bias

• Rejecting new evidence that contradicts an established paradigm – Semmelweis Effect

• Making decisions based to what is pleasing to imagine instead basing decisions on evidence and rationality – Wishful Thinking

• Assigning a higher value to disposal/loss compared with cost of acquisition – Sunk Cost Effect

• Viewing a harmful action as worse than an equally harmful omission or inaction –Omission Bias

• Justifying increased investment based on the cumulative prior investment despite new evidence suggesting that the decision was wrong - Irrational Escalation

Page 16: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 16

Probability And Belief Biases

• Excessive or inflated belief one's performance, ability – Overconfidence Effect

• Belief gaining plausibility through increasing repetition - Availability Cascade

• Assigning greater weight to initial or recent events more than subsequent or later events – Serial Position Effect

• Assigning a lower probability to the whole than the probabilities of the parts – Subadditivity Effect

• Avoidance of risk or the negative by pretending they do not exist – Ostrich Effect

• Judging future events in a more positive light than is warranted by actual experience – Optimism Bias

• Perceiving patterns where none exist – Clustering

• Selecting an options for which the probability of a favorable outcome is known over an option for which the probability of a favorable outcome is unknown - Ambiguity Effect

• Considering information to be correct if it has any personal meaning or significance – Subjective Validation

• Overestimating the likelihood of positive rather than negative outcomes – Valence Effect

• Failure to examine all possible outcomes when making a judgment –Attentional Bias

Page 17: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 17

Attributional Biases

• Where skilled underrate their abilities and unskilled overrate their abilities – Dunning–Kruger Effect

• Defending the status quo – System Justification

• Overestimation of agreement – False Consensus Effect

Page 18: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 18

Strategic Misrepresentation

• Deliberate misrepresentation in planning and budgeting caused bydistorted incentives

• Response to how organisations structure rewards and give rise tomotivations

• Systematic (and predictable) misrepresentation

− Deliberately understand costs to gain acceptance with understanding that costs will increase

− Not willing to face reality of high costs

− Overstatement or understatement of requirements

− Competition for scarce funds or jockeying for position

− Inclusion of ideology into planning

• Underlying system and processes need redesign to eliminate

Page 19: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 19

What Are The Key Disciplines The Chief Skeptical Needs To Promote

• Disciplines and Skills

− Benefits Management and Realisation

− Capital Planning and Investment Management

− Business and Process Analysis

− Solution and Process Analysis and Architecture Design

• Practices

− Reference Class Forecasting

−Audits and Checklists

Page 20: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 20

Reference Class Forecasting

• Technique to improve accuracy in plans and projections by basing them on actual performance in a reference class of comparable actions

• Based on knowledge about actual performance

−Analyse distributions and probability of cost overruns

− Compare the proposed project with the reference class distribution to establish the most likely outcome

• Used to avoid Planning Fallacy, Strategic

Misrepresentation and Optimism Bias

Page 21: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 21

Benefits Management And Realisation

• To increase the likelihood of success from IT and other investments, organisations must identify the different causes of benefits before developing any project implementation plan

• Types of IT projects with very different approaches to benefits management− Fixing or improving something that exists

• Resolve problem

• Improve integration

− Implementing a new initiative • New system

• New processes

• Need to focus on the changes needed to achieve results and take full advantage of new facilities offered rather than on just IT features

• Effective change management is crucial to achieving benefits

Page 22: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 22

Achieving Benefits – Some Questions To Ask

• Why is there a need to improve?

• What improvements are needed? What improvements are possible or achievable? Have the improvements been agreed by all stakeholders?

• What benefits will be realised by each stakeholder if the business objectives are achieved? How can each benefit be measured?

• Who owns each of the benefits and will be accountable for its delivery?

• What business changes are needed to achieve each benefit? Have the explicit links between each benefits and required business changes been identified?

• Who will be responsible for ensuring the business changes are made successfully?

• How and when can the changes be made? Who will make the changes? Does the business have the ability and capacity to make the changes?

Page 23: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 23

Benefits Management And Benefits Dependency Network

• Benefits Dependency Network (BDN) is an approach to linking:

− Information Technology Enablers, Changes and New Capabilities – enabling technologies and functions and facilities needed to support the realisation of the identified benefits and to allow the necessary changes to be undertaken

− Business Changes – business activities and new ways of working that are required to ensure that the desired benefits are realised

− Enabling Changes - prerequisites for achieving the business changes or that are essential to bring the new system into effective operation

− Business Objectives - high level priorities in relation to the drivers, outcomes and improvements to be delivered on completion of the project

− Business Benefits - outcomes of a change that are deemed to be positive by a stakeholder and that are valuable to the organisation and are measureable

− Stakeholders - individuals or groups who will benefit from the project and areeither affected by or directly involved in making the changes needed to realise the benefits

Page 24: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 24

Types Of Changes

• Business Changes - Permanent changes to working practices, processes, procedures, interactions and relationships that will cause the benefits to be delivered−Generally need new IT system to be in place

−May require enabling changes to be implemented

• Enabling Changes - Typically one-time changes that are pre-requisites for making the business changes or are necessary to bring the new system into effective operation− Can be made in advance of system implementation

− Training

− Processes redesign

−New work practices

− Changes to job roles and responsibilities

Page 25: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 25

Benefits Dependency Network

Information Technology

Enablers, Changes and

New Capabilities

Enabling Changes

BusinessChanges

BusinessBenefits

BusinessObjectives

Require Allow EnableProvide for Delivery of

• BDN provides a framework for explicitly linking the overall investment objectives and the requisite benefits with the business changes which are necessary to deliver those benefits and the essential IT functionality to both drive and enable these changes to be made.

• BDN forms part of the benefits realisation plan

• Helps keep the focus on benefits realisation during the program execution

• Allows variations of the project or program to be assessed for their impact on benefits realisation

Page 26: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 26

Benefits Dependency Network

Information Technology

Enablers, Changes and

New Capabilities

Enabling Changes

BusinessChanges

BusinessBenefits

BusinessObjectives

Means to Achieve Changes

Ways to Achieve Changes Results of Changes

Page 27: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 27

Benefits Dependency Network

What Information Technology Capabilities

and Features Offer

What Users Do With

Information Technology Capabilities

What Information Technology Capabilities

Achieve

What the Business

Gains From Information Technology Capabilities

Why the Business Uses The

Information Technology Capabilities

Understand Why the Business Will Use the Information Technology System

What Information Technology Capabilities

Are Required

What the Business Has

to Do

What the Business Needs to Provide

What the Business

Needs To See

What the Business Wants

Understand What Information Technology System is Needed to Deliver on Requirements

Page 28: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 28

Benefits Dependency Network

• Shows the link from the solution, through business activities, outcomes and benefits to the organisation's overall drivers

• Used to confirm that the solution being introduced will actuallyprovide the results you are seeking

• Any function within the proposed solution that is not linked to a benefit is potentially of doubtful value

• Functions with many link or links to key benefits can be identified and given extra attention

• BDN is a complex approach that requires benefit identification, assessment, validation and realisation maturity within the organisation

• Imposes a rigour on the organisation in analysing benefits from projects

Page 29: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 29

Capital Planning And IT And Other Investment Core Requirements

• Determine the scale, scope, and sources of funding for IT and other areas

• Assign financial resources to competing activities within the IT portfolio

• Establish a balance between capital expenditure (new projects) and operating expenditure (running systems delivered by past projects)

• Optimise the total cost of ownership

• Manage IT and other portfolios for value and not just cost

• IT and other areas need to implement a process for justifying its costs and be seen to be taking these steps

Page 30: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 30

Capital Planning And IT and Other Investment Management

• Aligns IT and other investments to organisation strategy (scoring)

• Prioritises investments (ranking)

• Provides strategic criteria for investment analysis

• Conduct annual IT and other portfolio management reviews

• Provides recommendation to stop, slow, maintain or accelerate program funding

• Identifies redundant/inefficient systems

• Integrates IT and other architectures within investments

• Ensures compliance with funding standards

Page 31: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 31

Characteristics Of Credible Cost Estimates

• Clear identification of requirements of the ultimate deliverable

• Broad participation in preparing estimates

• Availability of valid data for performing estimates – historical, experience, benchmarks

• Standardised and comprehensive estimate structure that includes all possible sources of cost

• Provision for uncertainties – include known costs explicitly and allow for unknown costs

• Recognition of inflation

• Recognition of excluded costs

• Independent review of estimates for completeness and realism

• Revision of estimates for significant changes in requirements

Page 32: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 32

Challenges Of Developing Good Cost Estimates

• Requires detailed, stable, agreed requirements

• Agreed assumptions

• Access to detailed documentation and historical data for comparison

• Trained and experienced analysts

• Risk and uncertainty analysis

• Identification of a range of confidence levels

• Adequate contingency and management reserves

Page 33: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 33

Reasons for Good And Bad Cost Estimates

Detailed, Stable, Agreed Requirements Agreed Assumptions

Detailed Documentation and Historical Data

Effective Risk and Uncertainty Analysis

Trained and Experienced Analysts

Identification of a Range of Confidence LevelsAdequate Contingency and

Management Reserves

Complex Project or Technology

Unrealistic Project Savings

New Processes Untrained and Inexperienced Analysts

No or Limited Comparison Data Available

Project Instability

Unrealistic Assumptions Overoptimism

Unrealistic or Unreliable Data

Unfamiliar Technology or First-Time UseProblems Getting Access to Data Unreasonable

Project Baseline

Ineffective Risk and Uncertainty Analysis

• Lost of reasons for and causes of inaccurate cost estimates

Page 34: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 34

Sources of Risk and Uncertainty In Estimating Costs

• Lack of understanding of the project requirements

• Shortcomings of human language and differing interpretations of meaning of project

• Behaviour of parties involved in the cost estimation process

• Haste

• Deception

• Poor cost estimating and pricing practices

Page 35: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 35

IT Investment

• IT is commonly seen as failing to deliver value for money

• Benefits and value must be actively managed for

• Realising and assessing business benefits from IT-enabled investments involves more than simply assessing Total Cost of Ownership for IT-related projects and managing the IT budget

• Key requirements− Ability to get lifetime costs right− Ability to define benefits correctly and effectively− Ability to manage the benefits management process− Ability to increase and sustain benefits management maturity

• Use existing methodologies and frameworks to implement key requirements quickly− ITIM− Benefits Dependency Network− ValIT− Organisational change and commitment

• Effective benefits management enables organisations to clearly and consistently articulate IT’s contribution to achievement of business objectives

Page 36: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 36

Business and Process Analysis And Design Builds Bridge From Business To Solution

ProblemRequirement

Current State

Business Analysis and Solution

Design

Solution

Desired Future State

Business Analysis:

Elicit RequirementsAnalyse

CommunicateValidate

Solution Design:

Translate Requirements into

Solution

• Business analysis is a key driver of business value

• Solution delivery start with business analysis

Page 37: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 37

Weaknesses In Business Analysis Capabilities And Competencies At The Root of Many Project Failures

Business Needs Not Met

Opportunities Lost

Investment Wasted

Inadequate Business Case, Undefined Problem/Need

Business Benefits Not Measured

Poor Analysis Practices

Business Requirements Not Captured

Poor Requirements

Poor Strategic Alignment

Poor Focus on Business Needs

Inadequate Resource Allocation and Prioritisation

Inadequate Business Involvement

Poor Solution Design

Inadequately Explored Solution Options

Solution Design Not Aligned to Business Needs

Large Project, Complex, Difficult

Changes and Processes

Large Project Team and Multiple Stakeholders

Size/Capacity/Complexity

Uncertainly/Ambiguity

Unproven Technology

Dynamic, Changing Environment

Page 38: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 38

Analysis-Related Causes Of Failures

Business Needs Not Met

Opportunities Lost

Investment Wasted

Inadequate Business Case, Undefined Problem/Need

Business Benefits Not Measured

Poor Analysis Practices

Business Requirements Not Captured

Poor Requirements

Poor Strategic Alignment

Poor Focus on Business Needs

Inadequate Resource Allocation and Prioritisation

Inadequate Business Involvement

Poor Solution Design

Inadequately Explored Solution Options

Solution Design Not Aligned to Business Needs

Large Project, Complex, Difficult

Changes and Processes

Large Project Team and Multiple Stakeholders

Size/Capacity/Complexity

Uncertainly/Ambiguity

Unproven Technology

Dynamic, Changing Environment

Page 39: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 39

Taking A Complete View of Systems And Processes Is Essential to Solution Success

• Overall solution operates with a mix of automated and manual processes in a structured or ad-hoc manner o deliver the required results

• Understanding the overall set of processes and their operation is crucial to successful results

• Need to see the entire picture to understand how a solution should operate

− Systems/applications are just one part of this universe

• Unambiguous definition of processes is required

• Processes that are to be automated define the scope of the development and implementation work

Page 40: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 40

Complete View of Systems and Processes Is Essential to Solution Success

System Component

System Component

System Component

External Component

External Component

External Component

Automated Process

Automated Process

Automated Process

External Manual

Interaction

External Manual

Interaction

Manual Process

Manual Process

External Manual

Interaction

External Manual

Interaction

Manual Process

Manual Process

Page 41: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 41

Solution Design and Implementation Sequence

Business Plan

Business Need

Business Benefits

Requirements Definition

Process Design

Solution Architecture and Design

Technical and Detailed Design

Implementation

Defines where the business wants to go

Business need identifies solutions that will allow

delivery of plan

Defines the benefits to be achieved by the solution

Defines the detailed requirements of the solution

Defines the processes that will be implemented by the solution

Defines the solution design to implement the processes

Creates a detailed technical design for implementation

Implements the detailed design

Page 42: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 42

Consistent Approach to Business And Process Analysis

• Adopt a consistent and robust framework in business analysis − Enables effective benefits realisation through a solution which meets the

business need

• Key elements− Establish enterprise standards, procedures and governance

− Standardise on infrastructure, analysis methods and operational procedures

− Develop competence and skills

• Key benefits− Implement solutions that meet business needs

− Increase the ability of the business to adapt quickly to changes

− Reduce risk, complexity, redundancy and support complexity

− Align business and IT

− Enable re-use and faster time-to-market

− Present one face to the business (customer)

− Increase business value

Page 43: The Chief Skeptical Officer – A New C-Level Role

October 18, 2011 43

More Information

Alan McSweeney

[email protected]


Recommended