1
The MED Biod iversit y Prot ect ion Know ledge Plat form Em anuele Mancosu/Sonsoles San Rom án Eu rop e a n Top ic Ce n t re – Un ive rsit y o f Ma la g a (ETC-UMA)
“Brid g in g th e Sc ie n ce -Pra c t ice -Po licy Ga p in Me d it e rra n e a n Biod ive rsity Pro te c t ion ” 25 October 20 17, Barcelona
MED Biod iversit y Prot ect ion Com m unit y
3 3
PANACeA objectives
Aim o f th e p la t fo rm a s m a in too l to syn th e t ize
a n d d isse m in a te sc ie n t ific kn ow le d g e a n d b e st p ra c t ice
Biod ive rsity p ro te c t ion e ffo rt s b y th e MED
Com m u n ity o f p ro je c t s: • Mon ito rin g p ro toco ls on c lim a te ch a n g e a n d
m a rin e lit t e r
• Ma n a g e m e n t o f Posid on ia a n d b e a ch d u n e s
• Ne w te ch n o log ie s fo r w a te r m on ito rin g
• Gove rn a n ce m od e ls fo r fish e rie s a n d w e t la n d s
• ….
4
MED Biodiversity Protection Knowledge Platform
5
MED Biodiversity Protection Knowledge Platform
Synergies with Modular partners
Synergies with Axis Sustainable tourism
Synergies with the MED programme
01234567
General overview Inputs from MPs by type
6
MED Platform implementation
Conceptual model - functionalities
I. Search interface
II. Metadata information
III. Data preview
IV. Data access and/or download
V. Access to restricted data
VI. Communication with interested users
I. Search Engine
II. Map Viewer
III. Metadata catalogue
IV. Document viewer
V. Communication tool
VI. Publishing/upload tool
Conceptual model – tools/modules selected
Support the definition on what is a priority and what is not: Geodatabase, geographic data, tabular data
7
MED Platform modules
According to the data received from the community! e.g. pilot sites of Biodiversity community
I. Search engine
II. Map Viewer
III. Metadata catalogue
IV. Document viewer
V. Communication tool
VI. Publishing/upload tool
Tools versus Software solutions • How good is a certain software solution at providing certain
functionality?
• What offers the highest degree and quality of integration achieved among the selected software solutions to provide a coherent user experience?
• How complex are the configuration, integration and
customization, to match budget available and project deadlines?
8
MED Platform search engine examples
9
MED Platform data viewer examples
10
MED Platform modules assessment
Functionality Usability Documentation Installation Reliability Average score
CKAN 8 9 8 6 9 7,8
ESRI geoportal 8 6 6 6 7 7,2
GeoNetwork 8 8 9 9 9 8,6
GeoNode 7 9 7 7 8 7,6
Functionality Usability Documentation Installation Reliability Average score
CKAN 7 9 8 6 9 7,8 GeoNetwork 8 9 9 9 9 8,8 GeoNode 8 9 7 7 8 7,8
Search engine
Data viewer
11
MED Platform metadata catalogue
Tools toward software solutions
I. Search Engine
II. Map Viewer
III. Metadata catalogue
IV. Document viewer
V. Communication tool
VI. Publishing/upload tool
Contents Introduction 1. Definitions 2. What do we have? 2.1 Metadata schemas 2.2 Keywords thesauri 3. Schema implementation and compatibility 3.1 Schema comparison 3.2 Metadata profile
12
MED Platform metadata concept
• Spatial data requirements?
• Interreg MED requirements?
• Other projects’ requirements (e.g. BluetourMED)?
• Where is the compromise?
Metadata: set of elements that describe a resource Metadata schema: define fields and structure of the resource information e.g. ISO 19115/19139 Metadata keywords: free text or established by a controlled vocabulary (thesaurus) e.g. GEMET, KEEP
Software Storage Creation Import Export CKAN (with plugins) Own schema
supporting DCAT-AP 1.1 and the most relevant fields from ISO 19139 XML
Own schema DCAT-AP 1.1 DCAT-JSON, ISO 19139 XML
ISO 19139, DCAT RDF
Geonetwork (with plugins)
Any schema can be stored
ISO 19139 XML, Dublin Core XML, ISO 19115-3 XML, SensorML
ISO 19139 XML, Dublin Core XML, ISO 19115-3 XML, SensorML
ISO 19139 XML, Dublin Core XML, ISO 19115-3 XML, SensorML, DCAT RDF
Geonode (with plugins)
Own schema supporting most relevant fields from ISO 19139 XML
Own schema ISO 19139 XML (subset)
Atom, NASA DIF XML, Dublin Core XML, ebRIM XML, FGDC XML, ISO 19139 XML
13
MED Platform physical implementation
Option 1 Option 2
14
MED Platform entry page - examples
15
MED Platform data visualization options
Navigation through address bar
Metadata information
License information
16
MED Platform potential use - examples
https://www.eea.europa.eu/ds_resolveuid/08C5534B-EB57-46F5-90DA-E6ED861806C3
Distribution of the marine Angiosperm Posidonia oceanica and Zostera sp. in the Mediterranean, P. Panayiotides, HCMR
POSBEMED France Italy Spain Greece Cyprus
17
Aggregation of site data to national extent data
Source: MWO 2012
18
MED Platform potential use - examples
Human Pressure Indicator
19
Cumulative pressure on pilot sites
20
Cumulative pressure on pilot sites – on-going
21
Pilot Protected areas and participating sites
22
MED Platform data policy
Draft prepared by ETC-UMA, and circulated among partners
OBJECTIVE: regulating and promoting data resulting from the modular projects in axis 3.2. including data access, data sharing and data utilization of results of the MED Biodiversity Protection Community.
Data copyright should be correctly cited when used to produce new knowledge, with an open source policy that does not allow commercial use nor sub-licensing as Interreg MED programme stated in the Programme Manual: Standard for activities and productions.
Contents A. Introduction (PANACeA) B. Scope C. Terms and conditions (data policy) D. Access and availability (Data distribution) E. Restrictions F. Copyrights G. No Commercial Use H. No Sub-licensing or Redistribution I. License and Attribution J. Disclaimer of warranty K. Contact Information
23
Next steps: PANACeA MED platform
PANACeA platform developments and knowledge exchanges about: • Geoportals (AMAre..) • Spatial data standards (EMODnet…) • Metadata standards • Other…
20 November 2017
• Beta version of the platform
December 2017
24
[email protected] [email protected]
MED Biodiversity Protection Community https://biodiversity-protection.interreg-med.eu
24
Recommended
