Valuing ‘good practice’ through landscape
management assessment
Geneviève Girod - [email protected]
The need to include, beyond Ecosystem Services
issues:
Interaction with stakeholders,
not only at the project stage, but also through a
continuous process of experimentation and feedback
Frame built upon ISO 37101 toolbox
Sustainable development of communities —
Management systems — Requirements with guidance
for resilience and smartness
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme
for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 603447
FP7, Collaborative Project
1 December 2013 – 30 November 2016
Good synergies between environmental and socio-cultural services
Culture offers a support for
ecological practice, domestic
biodiversity and enforce
integrated landscape approach.
Most addressed topic:
Culture and community identity
Education and capacity building
Some gaps on:
Health and care
Security and safety
Resilience
Classification of number of collected initiatives through issues/purposes from 0 (white) to more than 5 (dark grey)
>
PURPOSES
ISSUES Attractiveness Social cohesion Well-being
Preservation
and
improvement of
environment
Resilience Responsible
resource use
Governance
Education and
capacity
building
Innovation,
creativity and
research
Health and care
in the
community
Culture and
community
identity
Living together,
interdependence
and mutuality
Economy and
sustainable
production and
consumption
Living and
working
environment
Safety and
security
Community
infrastructures
Mobility
Biodiversity and
ES
Landscape Management needs to be applied in context
SWOT trial upon
stakeholders’ interviews (Strength Weakness
Opportunity Threat) >
PURPOSES
ISSUES Attractiveness
Social
cohesion Well-being
Environment
preservation
and
improvement
Resilience
Responsible
resources
use
Governance
Education
Innovation and
créativity
Health and car
Culture and
identity
Living together
Economy and
sustainable
consumption
Linving and
working
environment
Safety and
security
Community
infrastructures
Mobility
Biodiversity
and ES
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%Attractiveness
Social Cohesion
Well-Being
Preservation andimprovement of
environment
Resilience
Resource
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
Potential to improve
Your Score
View on Hercules Labs:
Hercules Labs: http://labs.kh.hercules-landscapes.eu/themeGLP_valuation.html
What’s next ?
Landscape Ecological Diagnostic Based on “eco-anthropological”
approach and upon landscape features
functions
Recommended
