Transcript
Page 1: Working in Dangerous & Remote Circumstances

Working in Dangerous and Remote Circumstances

By Andrew Douglas and Saide Elcheikh

5 October 2012

Mob: 0488 151 503Email: [email protected]

http://au.linkedin.com/in/douglasandrewhttp://leadingthought.com.au/http://twitter.com/leading_thought

Page 2: Working in Dangerous & Remote Circumstances

Safety Management System

• DO YOU HAVE A SAFE WORKPLACE?

Page 3: Working in Dangerous & Remote Circumstances

Managing Risks – Hierarchy of Control

1. What are the risks?

2. How can we control them?

In most cases, a combination of the risk control measures should be applied to ensure that the risk to health and safety is reduced so far as is reasonably practicable...

• IF YOU CANNOT ASCERTAIN THE RISK THE LEVEL OF RISK IS HIGH

Page 4: Working in Dangerous & Remote Circumstances

Reasonably Practicable

1. Likelihood of the hazard or risk occurring.

2. Degree of harm that might result from the hazard or risk.

3. What the person concerned knows, or ought reasonably to know about the hazard or the risk and way of minimising or eliminating the risk.

4. Availability and suitability of ways to eliminate or minimise the risk.

5. The costs associated with available ways of eliminating or minimising the risk.

Page 5: Working in Dangerous & Remote Circumstances

Take 5 Approach – How to stay safe!

• Stop, think. If there is any doubt, don’t go ahead!

Page 6: Working in Dangerous & Remote Circumstances

Some cases for a bit of context…

Here are the facts of some cases of dangerous situations for public officials:

• R v Rondo (2001) 126 A Crim R 562– Police requested search of the accused (sprayed someone in the face with a substance)– Assaulted police - punched them– Police were rightly undertaking their duty to search and arrest and were put in danger

• Egan Darius Ross v Darren Stephen Mothersole [2010] ACTSC 125– Accused hit victim in the face with a beer glass– When caught by police he threatened to ‘smash’ their faces in, had a fighting stance– This constituted a threat to the safety of the public officials and obstruction

• Ashley Michael Charnock v Simon James Coady et al [2010] ACTSC 26– Police were doing a routine drive by– A group of males outside the nightclub threw a bottle at the vehicle– Police stopped to approach the mean and further altercations occurred– Police ended up in hospital

Page 7: Working in Dangerous & Remote Circumstances

CONTACT

VICTORIA

Dandenong40-42 Scott StDandenong VIC 3175Tel: +61 3 9794 2600

MelbourneLevel 22, 114 William StMelbourne VIC 3000Tel: +61 3 8615 9900

Andrew DouglasDir: +61 (3) 8615 9915Mob: 0488 151 [email protected]

NEW SOUTH WALES

SydneyLevel 21, 20 Bond StSydney NSW 2000Tel: +61 2 8298 9533

TASMANIA

HobartDobson Mitchell & Allport Lawyers59 Harrington StHobart TAS 7000Tel:+61 3 6210 0000

QUEENSLAND

BrisbaneLevel 14, 324 Queen StreetBrisbane QLD 4001Tel: +61 7 3235 0400

[email protected]

M+K SERVICES

CommercialCommercial LitigationPropertyWorkplace RelationsPrivate Clients

mk.com.au


Recommended