Upload
llr-partners
View
1.203
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
LLR Partners' Scott Perricelli describes the pros and cons of selling a business to a venture capital/private equity firm (sponsor) or a larger company (strategic). He covers: trends in M&A transaction volume and valuation multiples; what investors look for in a business; the typical deal lifecycle and tips to prepare for a liquidity event. These slides were originally presented in October 2012 on a webinar with Corporation Service Company (CSC). They were updated with additional data in May 2013.
Citation preview
Seller OptionsSponsors vs. StrategicsOriginally presented October 10, 2012. Updated May 2, 2013.
2
LLR Background
• Founded in 1999 by trusted advisors to middle market growth companies in the Mid-Atlantic region seeking to:
• Share in the risk/reward of high growth companies
• Provide local businesses access to known and trusted capital providers
• Bring a user-friendly, customer service orientation to private equity
• Grown into a national provider of late-stage growth capital with deep domain expertise
• Maintained core values:
• Invest in growth
• Align with management
• Treat companies like clients
LLR FranchiseInvestment Professionals 32
Current Check Size $20 – $100m
Investments 59
Exits 32
Minority / Majority 50% / 50%
Hold Period 2 – 11 years
3
Business Services Consumer & Education Financial Services Healthcare Services Software & IT Services
• Business Process Outsourcing• Professional Services to Niche
Markets• Government Services• Fixed Asset Management• Marketing Services &
Technology• Data Analytics• Human Capital Management• HR Outsourcing• Transportation & Logistics• Information Services
• Multi-Unit Businesses• Internet & Catalog Retail• Multiline & Specialty Retail• Diversified Services• Durables & Beverages• Household Products• Childcare• K-12 Education• Post-Secondary Education• Education Technology• Training
• Financial Technology & Service Providers
• Specialty Finance• Software• Security• Alternative Payments• Broker / Dealers & Trading • Capital Markets Technology• Data & Analytics• Asset Managers• Insurance Brokerage• TPA & Service Providers
• Information Management• Revenue Cycle Management• Practice Management • Outpatient Services• Data Analytics & Informatics• Diagnostics & Monitoring• Distribution• Disease & Benefits
Management• Pharmacy Benefit
Management• Alternative Site Care
• Enterprise Software• Application Software• Systems Software• Infrastructure• Perpetual License and SaaS
Models• Managed / IT Services• Solutions Providers• Data Service Providers• Technology-Enabled Business
Services
Domain Expertise
4
290 320 326 360284 295 341
218137 170 194 242 274 291
345432 394
448 404 428 400456
214 236 227
220
171 188 200
71
69 99
111
162 147 188
230
239 224
253 242 226
194
233 68
94 50
43
25 33
24
16
12 19
19
25 25 45
30
44 35
38 28 28
31
35
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
(# of Deals) U.S. M&A Volume by Transaction Size: 2007 - Present
$20 - $100m $100 - $1,000m $1,000m+
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
290 320 326 360284 295
341
218137 170 194
242 274 291345
432 394448
404 428 400456 463
562
391
214 236 227
220
171 188
200
71
69 99
111
162 147
188
230
239 224
253 242 226
194
233 206
288
184
68
94 50 43
25 33
24
16
12
19 19
25 25
45
30
44
35
38
28 28
31
35 46
50
37
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1
$20-$100m $100m - $1000m $1000m+
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20132012
U.S. M&A Transaction Volume
Source: Capital IQ. Note: Excludes cancelled deals and deals with undisclosed information.
Transaction volumes have returned to pre-2009 levels, driven largely by strong growth in the lower middle market sector (TEV $20 to $100 million)
5
U.S. M&A Valuation Multiples (TEV/EBITDA)
Source: Capital IQ. Note: Excludes cancelled deals and deals with undisclosed information. Excludes transaction multiples greater than 20.0x.
Larger businesses continue to attract a premium relative to lower middle market businesses as acquirers are looking to deploy capital
TEV: $20 to $100m TEV: $100 to $1,000m TEV: $1,000m+
9.5x 9.4x
8.0x
8.9x
10.1x
7.9x
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
11.3x
11.9x
8.3x
9.9x 10.3x
9.6x
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
12.1x
10.7x
9.5x
10.4x
11.4x
10.1x
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
6
Sponsor vs. Strategic Transaction Volume
Source: Capital IQ. Note: Excludes cancelled deals and deals with undisclosed information.
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Q1 2013
Sponsor 25% 23% 25% 31% 35% 36% 37%
Strategic 75% 77% 75% 69% 65% 64% 63%
290 320 326 360284 295
341
218137 170 194
242 274 291345
432 394448
404 428 400456
214 236 227
220
171 188
200
71
69 99
111
162 147
188
230
239 224
253
242 226 194
233 68
94
50 43
25 33
24
16
12
19 19
25 25
45
30
44
35
38
28 28
31
35
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
$20 - $100m $100 - $1,000m $1,000m+
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
172 177 136 124 85 109 149 82 61 58
90 102 123 165 208 204 235 252 250 230 228 248 275 314 227
400 473 467 499 395 407 416 223 157 230
234 327 323 359 397 511 418 487 424 452 397 476 440 586 385
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1
Sponsor Strategic
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20132012
7
–
$10.0B
$20.0B
$30.0B
$40.0B
$50.0B
$60.0B
$70.0B
$80.0B
$90.0B
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Why Are Sponsor Premiums Widening?
Source: Capital IQ, Preqin Research. Note: Excludes cancelled deals and deals with undisclosed information. Excludes transaction multiples greater than 20.0x.
Valuations: Sponsors vs. Strategics Available Sponsor Capital
11.9x 11.8x
8.6x
9.8x
11.3x
10.3x
11.0x
10.6x
8.5x
9.7x
10.3x
9.1x
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Sponsor Strategic
8
What Differentiates Sponsors and Strategics?
Pros Cons
• Higher valuations due to potential synergies
• Typically buy 100% of the target, with shorter due diligence processes
• Less concern with issues common in entrepreneurial businesses (cyclicality, customer concentration, etc.)
• Selling management can typically exit the business after a transition period
• Flexible transaction structure to meet owner / management objectives
• Typically some money upfront and larger second bite at exit 3-7 years later
• Often structured to allow non-owner employees to earn ownership over time
• Typically don’t get involved operationally –instead take advisory board seats
• Lower upfront cash proceeds due to cash reinvestment requirements
• Often require management to stay / retain meaningful ensure to align interests
• Management fees and leverage can burden a growing business
• Detailed due diligence / prolonged time to close (60-90 days) can distract management
• In a 100% sale, sellers will be unable to monetize future growth opportunities
• Little opportunity for remaining management to have ownership in resulting entity
• Reduced job security for employees
• Potentially adverse culture change post-integration / loss of owner legacy
Sponsors
Strategics
9
Different Types of Sponsors
Early Stage Venture Capital Growth Equity Large
Leveraged Buyouts
Company Size (Revenue) Under $10 Million $20 to $250 Million Above $500 Million
Investment Size Under $5 Million $10 to $100 Million Above $100 Million
Reliance on Leverage Never Sometimes Often
Control Rarely Sometimes Always
Risk SignificantModerate Execution Risk; Inherent and Structural
Downside ProtectionModerate Execution Risk; Significant Financial Risk
Return Potential High Returns, Low Probability
Attractive Risk-Adjusted Returns Modest Returns
10
What Does LLR Look For In Businesses?
• Provider of mission-critical solutions
• Capable management team looking to partner
• Recurring revenue model and stable customer base
• Opportunity to consolidate fragmented sectors
• Committed team willing to maintain meaningful ownership
• Cross-selling opportunities
• Acquisition pipeline
11
Deal Life Cycle
Proactive, Targeted Industry ResearchInvestment Bankers Existing Network &
Referral Sources
Process Deal Flow
Initial Deal Criteria Review / Screening by Deal Team
Advanced Evaluation / Initial Partner Review Submission of IOI
Negotiation of Term Sheet or LOIDetailed Due Diligence
Deal Close
200 deals
100 deals
25 deals
5 deals
1 investment
12
How Can You Prepare For a Liquidity Event?
• Understand your objectives• Depending on answer, get business in order
• Prepare audited set of financials for two years prior to event
• Prepare growth plan supported by sales / acquisition pipelines
• Formalize business processes and systems
• Address gaps in management team
• Resolve customer issues, if any
• Separate personal assets from the business (real estate, leases)
• Carefully consider engaging a financial advisor
Scott [email protected]
Christian BullittPrincipal, Business [email protected]
Brian BerkinVice [email protected]