20
Post-school Transitions of People who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Mariela Fordyce, Sheila Riddell, Rachel O’Neill and Elisabet Weedon

3rd June Mariela Fordyce

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 3rd June Mariela Fordyce

Post-school Transitions of People who are Deaf

or Hard of Hearing

Mariela Fordyce, Sheila Riddell, Rachel O’Neill and Elisabet Weedon

Page 2: 3rd June Mariela Fordyce

1. Overview

� Study commissioned by the NDCS in 2012

� Aim - to investigate the post-school transition process of young people who are DHH in Scotland

Post-school destinationsBarriersSupport Independent adulthood

Page 3: 3rd June Mariela Fordyce

2. Context of the research

� Recent economic crisis

� Scottish Government’s efforts to reform post-school transition policies

� UK Government’s reform of the welfare system

� Equality legislation

Page 4: 3rd June Mariela Fordyce

3. Methods

� Analysis of policy and legislation

� Analysis of administrative and survey data

� Interviews with 30 young people aged 18-24• School background• Post-school transition planning• Experiences of post-16 education, training and

employment• Personal background: identity and social networks

Page 5: 3rd June Mariela Fordyce

4. Findings

� School experiences

� Post-school transition planning

� Experiences of higher education

� Experiences of further education and training

� Experiences on the labour market� Markers of adulthood

Page 6: 3rd June Mariela Fordyce

5. Interpreting the data

� Mixed-methods research Broad patterns (official statistics) Individual experiences (case studies)

� Representativeness

Page 7: 3rd June Mariela Fordyce

6. School experiences

� No official statistics about the total number of pupils who are DHH in Scottish schools

� Most participants went to mainstream schools, were educated orally and supported by ToDs

� BSL users changed schools more frequently

� Variation in support between schools/authorities

� Communication barriers

� Most common difficulties – not academic, but social

� Reluctance to ‘stand out’

Page 8: 3rd June Mariela Fordyce

7. School leavers’ attainment

SOURCE: ATTAINMENT AND LEAVER DESTINATIONS, SUPPLEMENTARY DATA. SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT (2013)Note. This figure shows a selection of all qualifications; therefore reported percentages do not add up to 100.

Page 9: 3rd June Mariela Fordyce

8. School leavers’ destinations

SOURCE: ATTAINMENT AND LEAVER DESTINATIONS, SUPPLEMENTARY DATA. SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT (2013)

Page 10: 3rd June Mariela Fordyce

9. Post-school transition planning

� Most participants did not have post-school transition plans

� School leavers who aimed to go to university were better informed than school leavers with lower qualifications

� Young people from socially-advantaged backgrounds benefited from parental support

� Difficulties in the transition to adult social and health services

Page 11: 3rd June Mariela Fordyce

10. Experiences of higher education

� Good levels of support, e.g. equipment and communication support

� Some variation between institutions

� Communication barriers

� A need for: good self-advocacy skills pastoral support from disability advisors parental involvement in negotiating support

� Students from disadvantaged backgrounds were more likely to drop out

Page 12: 3rd June Mariela Fordyce

11. Further education and training

� Patchy support in further education

� Poor support on training programmes

� More reliance on informal support from peers

� More instances of discriminatory attitudes

� Fewer instances of self-advocacy and parental involvement

Page 13: 3rd June Mariela Fordyce

12. Employment rates of working-age people in the UK by disability status

SOURCE: THE LABOUR FORCE SURVEY 2012 QUARTER 2

Page 14: 3rd June Mariela Fordyce

13. Destinations of graduates

SOURCE: WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? AGCAS DISABILITY TASK GROUP (2012)

Page 15: 3rd June Mariela Fordyce

14. Barriers to finding and staying in employment

Graduates Non-graduates

Lack of accessibility in applying for work

Discrimination in recruitment practices

Lack of deaf awareness

Lack of work experience

Limited social networks

Lack of support in employment

Page 16: 3rd June Mariela Fordyce

15. Markers of adulthood

� Marked differences between higher education graduates and people with lower qualifications:

Independent living arrangements Geographically mobile Financial independence Wider social networks Career planning

Page 17: 3rd June Mariela Fordyce

16. Socio-economic status and post-school outcomes

Strong association between parental socio-economic status and post-school outcomes

Parental support/advocacy power

School qualifications

Post-school destinations

Work experience

Discrimination on the labour market

Employment rates

Page 18: 3rd June Mariela Fordyce

17. Conclusions

� Young people who are DHH had poorer school and post-school outcomes than their hearing peers

� School qualifications and post-school outcomes were strongly associated with parental socio-economic status

� Those with higher education qualifications had good employment outcomes

� The most disadvantaged group were the young people who came from low socio-economic groups and left school with few or no qualifications

Page 19: 3rd June Mariela Fordyce

18. Limitations

� Young people with lower qualifications and from less socially-advantaged areas were underrepresented in the study

� The study does not include the views of practitioners

Page 20: 3rd June Mariela Fordyce

Further information about the project can be found at:

http://www.ed.ac.uk/schools-departments/education/rke/centres-groups/creid/projects/postsch-trans-young-hi

19. Thank you!